Crystal structure of tetra­hydro­seselin, an angular pyran­ocoumarin

Bauri, A.K.; Foro, S.; Rahman, A.F.M.M.

doi:10.1107/S205698901700932X

research communications

CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS

ISSN: 2056-9890

Volume 73| Part 8| August 2017| Pages 1117-1120

https://doi.org/10.1107/S205698901700932X

Open

access

Crystal structure of tetrahydroseselin, an angular pyranocoumarin

A. K. Bauri,^a S. Foro ^b and A. F. M. M. Rahman ^c ^*

^aBio-Organic Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Trombay, Mumbai 400 085, India, ^bInstitute of Materials Science, Darmstadt University of Technology, Alarich-Weiss-Strasse 2, D-64287 Darmstadt, Germany, and ^cDepartment of Applied Chemistry & Chemical Engineering, University of Dhaka, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh
^*Correspondence e-mail: mustafizacce@du.ac.bd

Edited by G. Smith, Queensland University of Technology, Australia (Received 10 May 2017; accepted 21 June 2017; online 4 July 2017)

In the title compound, tetrahydroseselin, C₁₄H₁₆O₃, a pyranocoumarin [systematic name: 8,8-dimethyl-3,4,9,10-tetrahydro-2H,8H-pyrano[2,3-f]chromen-2-one] obtained from the hydrogenation of seselin in the presence of Pd/C in MeOH at room temperature, the dihedral angle between the central benzene ring and the best planes of the outer fused ring systems are 6.20 (7) and 10.02 (8)°. In the crystal, molecules show only very weak intermolecular C—H⋯O interactions.

Keywords: crystal structure; naturally occurring seselin; T. stictocarpum; tetrahydroseselin; Pd/C hydrogenation in MeOH.

CCDC reference: 1557474

1. Chemical context

The title molecule, tetrahydroseselin, a hydrogenated product of an angular pyranocoumarin, seselin, consists of three different kinds of fused rings: a central benzene ring, an outer pyrone ring and a pyrane ring with dimethyl substituents attached at C3. These pyranocoumarins have absorption bands in the near UV region resulting from the presence of conjugated double bonds in the enone system and exhibit photo-mutagenic and photo-carcinogenic properties (Appendino et al., 2004 ), which bind with the purine base of DNA in living cells to yield photo-adducts (Conforti et al., 2009 ). Based on this property, the molecules are used to treat numerous inflammatory skin diseases such as atopic dermatitis and pigment disorders like vitiligo and psoriasis, through exposure to UV radiation in photo dynamic therapy (PDT). Because of their strong ability to absorb UV radiation, these classes of molecules are utilized as photo-protective agents to prevent the absorption of harmful UV radiation by the skin, in the form of a variety of sun-screening lotions widely used in dermatological applications in the cosmetic and pharmaceutical industries (Chen et al., 2007 , 2009 ). Also, in vitro anti-proliferative activity and in vivo photo-toxicity against numerous cancer cell lines, e.g. HL60 and A431, has been observed (Conconi et al., 1998 ). In addition, this class of coumarins have been successfully used in the treatment of inhibited proliferation in the human hepatocellular carcinoma cell line (March et al., 1993 ). Experimental results have shown that its photo-toxicity is extended via a Diels–Alder reaction to bind the double bond of a purine base of DNA in the living cell with the double bonds of coumarin to yield mono [(2 + 2) cycloaddition] and diadducts [(4 + 2) cycloaddition] (Conforti et al., 2009). As a part of our studies in this area, we are looking at the role of double bonds in the photo-biological activity of the aforesaid molecule. The crystal structure of the title compound tetrahydroseselin, C₁₄H₁₆O₃, is reported herein.

2. Structural commentary

In the title compound, the three different fused rings comprising the molecule (Fig. 1), are the central benzene ring (C1/C5–C12), the outer pyrone ring (O2/C6–C7) and the dihydropyrane ring (O1/C1–C2), with dimethyl substituents attached at C3. The mean planes of these rings (O1/C1–C2 and O2/C6–C7) are inclined to the benzene plane by 6.20 (7) and 10.02 (8)°, respectively. The angles between the mean plane of the benzene ring and the four planar atoms of each pyran ring (O1/C1–C2) and (O2/C6–C10) are 3.0 (1)° (r.m.s. of the fitted atoms = 0.0092 Å) and 2.6 (1)° (r.m.s. of the fitted atoms = 0.0046 Å), respectively. Both rings are in half-chair conformations and atoms C2, C3, C7 and C8 deviate by 0.282, 0.446, 0.241 and 0.687 Å, respectively, from the plane through the other four essentially planar atoms of the respective pyran rings. These distortions of the dihydropyran rings are probably the result of the ring flexibility and the presence of the methyl substituents. Experimental results from the title compound reveal that the photo-biological activity of the parent compound seselin has been diminished due to the formation of distorted half-chair conformations of the pyran rings on hydrogenation. The C6—C5—C1—O1 and C11—C10—C6—O2 torsion angles are almost the same viz. 178.44 (12) and 178.73 (14)°, respectively, indicating that these rings are coplanar. The destruction of photo-biological activity and change of conformation of the pyran rings of the title molecule is considered to be due to the loss of the double bonds in seselin.

Figure 1
The molecular structure of title compound, showing the atomic labelling. with displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level

3. Supramolecular features

In the crystal, no formal hydrogen bonds are present but the molecules exhibit very weak intermolecular C—H⋯O interactions; none of these, however, can be considered as hydrogen bonds. Examples are: aromatic C8—H⋯O2ⁱ (ring) [3.221 (2) Å] and methylene C9—H⋯O3ⁱ (carbonyl) [3.412 (2) Å] interactions [symmetry code: (i) x, −y + $[{1\over 2}]$ , z − $[{1\over 2}]$ ], together with aromatic C12—H⋯O3ⁱⁱ (ring) [3.598 (3) Å] and methylene C8—H⋯O3ⁱⁱ (carbonyl) [3.593 (3) Å] interactions [symmetry code: (ii) x + 1, −y + $[{1\over 2}]$ , z − $[{1\over 2}]$ ], giving `ribbons' extending along a through very weak head-to-tail R₄⁴(8) ring motifs (Figs. 2 and 3). No π–π ring associations are present [minimum ring centroid separation = 4.654 (1) Å].

Figure 2
A view of the crystal packing in the unit cell of the title compound.

Figure 3
Part of the crystal structure, with weak C—H⋯O interactions shown as dashed lines. The most significant C—H⋯O_ring and C—H⋯O_carbonyl interactions are shown as blue and orange dashed lines, respectively. Other H atoms have been omitted.

4. Synthesis and crystallization

The title compound was isolated as a colourless solid substance from the methanol extract of T. stictocarpum (in the local dialect, it is known as Aajmoda) by means of column chromatography over SiO₂ gel by gradient elution with a binary mixed solvent system of hexane and ethyl acetate. It was purified by reverse phase high-pressure liquid chromatography (RP–HPLC) followed by crystallization to yield a colourless product. This compound was subjected to hydrogenation using Pd/C in a protic solvent (MeOH) at room temperature with continuous mechanical stirring overnight. The reaction product was worked up by the usual method to yield a crude product, which was was purified by column chromatography over SiO₂ gel with gradient solvent elution to yield the pure title compound. Suitable crystals for X-ray diffraction analysis were obtained after recrystallization (×3) from ethyl acetate:hexane (1:4), by slow evaporation at room temperature. ¹H NMR data (CDCl₃, 200 MHz):δ_H 7.25 (d, 1H, J = 8.6 Hz, H-12), 6.68 (d, 1H, J = 8.6 Hz H-11), 2.40 (t, 1H, J = 6.6 Hz, H-4), 2.35 (t, 1H, J = 6.4 Hz, H-9), 2.26 (t, 2H, J = 6.4 Hz, H-8), 1.56 (t, 2H, J = 6.6 Hz, H-3), 1.50 (s, 3H, CH₃, H-13), 1.54 (s, 3H, CH₃, H-14).

5. Database survey

A search of the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD, Version 5.38, update November, 2016; Groom et al., 2016 ) gave more than thirty five hits for both linear and angular pyranocoumarin (psoralene class) structures. They include four reports, CSD refcodes AMYROL [Kato, 1970 : seselin (Amyrolin)]; AMYROL01 [Bauri et al., 2006 ; seselin (redetermination)]; FUGVOS {Thailambal & Pattabhi, 1987 : 2,3-dihydroxy-9-hydroxy-2(1-hydroxy-1-methylethyl)-7H-furo[3,2-g]-[1]-benzopyran-7-one; bromohydroxy-seselin (Bauri et al., 2017a ); dibromomomethoxy-seselin (DMS) (Bauri et al., 2017b )}, and a number of structures with various substituents at C3 and C4, many of which are natural products.

6. Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 1. All H atoms were located in difference-Fourier maps and the positional coordinates of all except the methyl H atoms were allowed to refine, with U_iso(H) = 1.2U_eq(C). Those on methyl groups were allowed to ride with C—H = 0.96 Å and with U_iso(H) = 1.2U_eq(C).

Table 1
Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula	C₁₄H₁₆O₃
M_r	232.27
Crystal system, space group	Monoclinic, P2₁/c
Temperature (K)	299
a, b, c (Å)	7.282 (1), 18.445 (3), 9.144 (2)
β (°)	96.11 (3)
V (Å³)	1221.2 (4)
Z	4
Radiation type	Cu Kα
μ (mm⁻¹)	0.71
Crystal size (mm)	0.50 × 0.50 × 0.40

Data collection
Diffractometer	Enraf–Nonius CAD-4
Absorption correction	ψ scan (North et al., 1968 )
T_min, T_max	0.717, 0.763
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections	4924, 2187, 1954
R_int	0.096
(sin θ/λ)_max (Å⁻¹)	0.598

Refinement
R[F² > 2σ(F²)], wR(F²), S	0.058, 0.151, 1.06
No. of reflections	2187
No. of parameters	187
H-atom treatment	H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρ_max, Δρ_min (e Å⁻³)	0.32, −0.21
Computer programs: CAD-4-PC (Enraf–Nonius, 1996 ), REDU4 (Stoe & Cie, 1987 ), SHELXS97 and SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ) and PLATON (Spek, 2009 ).

Supporting information

CCDC reference: 1557474

Crystal structure: contains datablock I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S205698901700932X/zs2379sup1.cif

Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S205698901700932X/zs2379Isup2.hkl

Supporting information file. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S205698901700932X/zs2379Isup3.cml

checkCIF report

Computing details top

Data collection: CAD-4-PC (Enraf–Nonius, 1996); cell refinement: CAD-4-PC (Enraf–Nonius, 1996); data reduction: REDU4 (Stoe & Cie, 1987); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: PLATON (Spek, 2009); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008).

8,8-Dimethyl-3,4,9,10-tetrahydro-2H,8H-pyrano[2,3-f]chromen-2-one top

Crystal data top

C₁₄H₁₆O₃	F(000) = 496
M_r = 232.27	D_x = 1.263 Mg m⁻³
Monoclinic, P2₁/c	Cu Kα radiation, λ = 1.54180 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybc	Cell parameters from 25 reflections
a = 7.282 (1) Å	θ = 6.1–22.1°
b = 18.445 (3) Å	µ = 0.71 mm⁻¹
c = 9.144 (2) Å	T = 299 K
β = 96.11 (3)°	Prism, colourless
V = 1221.2 (4) Å³	0.50 × 0.50 × 0.40 mm
Z = 4

Data collection top

Enraf–Nonius CAD-4 diffractometer	1954 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube	R_int = 0.096
Graphite monochromator	θ_max = 67.1°, θ_min = 4.8°
ω/2θ scans	h = −8→8
Absorption correction: ψ scan (North et al., 1968)	k = −22→0
T_min = 0.717, T_max = 0.763	l = −10→10
4924 measured reflections	3 standard reflections every 120 min
2187 independent reflections	intensity decay: 1.0%

Refinement top

Refinement on F²	Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: full	Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F² > 2σ(F²)] = 0.058	H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F²) = 0.151	w = 1/[σ²(F_o²) + (0.0834P)² + 0.1422P] where P = (F_o² + 2F_c²)/3
S = 1.06	(Δ/σ)_max = 0.017
2187 reflections	Δρ_max = 0.32 e Å⁻³
187 parameters	Δρ_min = −0.21 e Å⁻³
0 restraints	Extinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc^*=kFc[1+0.001xFc²λ³/sin(2θ)]^-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods	Extinction coefficient: 0.089 (5)

Special details top

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F² against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F², conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F². The threshold expression of F² > 2sigma(F²) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F² are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å²) top

	x	y	z	U_iso*/U_eq
C1	0.20282 (18)	0.18547 (7)	0.29558 (16)	0.0471 (4)
C2	0.3391 (2)	0.07055 (8)	0.2387 (2)	0.0587 (5)
C3	0.2859 (2)	0.04422 (8)	0.3851 (2)	0.0605 (5)
H3A	0.288 (2)	−0.0078 (11)	0.378 (2)	0.073*
H3B	0.382 (3)	0.0604 (10)	0.461 (2)	0.073*
C4	0.0980 (2)	0.07214 (8)	0.4157 (2)	0.0616 (5)
H4A	0.077 (3)	0.0653 (10)	0.515 (3)	0.074*
H4B	−0.002 (3)	0.0455 (10)	0.349 (2)	0.074*
C5	0.08030 (19)	0.15144 (7)	0.37942 (16)	0.0475 (4)
C6	−0.05415 (18)	0.19413 (8)	0.43281 (16)	0.0477 (4)
C7	−0.3262 (2)	0.18844 (9)	0.56020 (19)	0.0594 (5)
C8	−0.3766 (2)	0.26087 (10)	0.4945 (3)	0.0713 (5)
H8A	−0.433 (3)	0.2557 (11)	0.384 (3)	0.086*
H8B	−0.459 (3)	0.2797 (12)	0.563 (3)	0.086*
C9	−0.2123 (2)	0.30853 (9)	0.4840 (2)	0.0641 (5)
H9A	−0.162 (3)	0.3240 (11)	0.594 (2)	0.077*
H9B	−0.251 (3)	0.3509 (12)	0.429 (2)	0.077*
C10	−0.0687 (2)	0.26811 (7)	0.41073 (18)	0.0515 (4)
C11	0.0569 (2)	0.29965 (7)	0.32680 (18)	0.0534 (4)
H11	0.050 (3)	0.3510 (10)	0.306 (2)	0.064*
C12	0.1899 (2)	0.25945 (8)	0.26732 (18)	0.0522 (4)
H12	0.277 (2)	0.2804 (10)	0.212 (2)	0.063*
C13	0.2047 (3)	0.04668 (11)	0.1106 (2)	0.0818 (6)
H13A	0.2463	0.0636	0.0205	0.098*
H13B	0.0849	0.0665	0.1210	0.098*
H13C	0.1975	−0.0053	0.1090	0.098*
C14	0.5356 (3)	0.04849 (10)	0.2193 (3)	0.0811 (6)
H14A	0.5689	0.0674	0.1280	0.097*
H14B	0.5444	−0.0034	0.2187	0.097*
H14C	0.6178	0.0676	0.2991	0.097*
O1	0.34407 (14)	0.14972 (5)	0.23956 (13)	0.0580 (4)
O2	−0.17164 (15)	0.15694 (6)	0.51821 (13)	0.0586 (4)
O3	−0.41482 (18)	0.15412 (7)	0.63843 (17)	0.0787 (5)

Atomic displacement parameters (Å²) top

	U¹¹	U²²	U³³	U¹²	U¹³	U²³
C1	0.0422 (7)	0.0445 (7)	0.0554 (8)	0.0013 (5)	0.0087 (6)	0.0009 (5)
C2	0.0557 (9)	0.0461 (8)	0.0758 (11)	0.0064 (6)	0.0141 (7)	−0.0035 (6)
C3	0.0594 (9)	0.0438 (8)	0.0792 (11)	0.0069 (6)	0.0112 (8)	0.0050 (7)
C4	0.0626 (9)	0.0441 (8)	0.0818 (11)	0.0018 (7)	0.0247 (8)	0.0087 (7)
C5	0.0455 (8)	0.0411 (7)	0.0567 (8)	−0.0012 (5)	0.0088 (6)	0.0012 (5)
C6	0.0449 (7)	0.0455 (8)	0.0538 (8)	−0.0038 (5)	0.0108 (6)	0.0005 (5)
C7	0.0495 (8)	0.0620 (9)	0.0695 (10)	−0.0067 (7)	0.0189 (7)	−0.0109 (7)
C8	0.0554 (9)	0.0700 (11)	0.0916 (14)	0.0063 (8)	0.0220 (9)	−0.0059 (9)
C9	0.0628 (10)	0.0520 (9)	0.0798 (12)	0.0073 (7)	0.0185 (8)	−0.0052 (8)
C10	0.0498 (8)	0.0440 (7)	0.0613 (8)	0.0017 (6)	0.0086 (7)	−0.0032 (6)
C11	0.0547 (8)	0.0388 (7)	0.0675 (9)	0.0004 (6)	0.0093 (7)	0.0035 (6)
C12	0.0496 (8)	0.0457 (8)	0.0627 (9)	−0.0036 (6)	0.0130 (7)	0.0063 (6)
C13	0.0920 (14)	0.0689 (11)	0.0833 (13)	0.0066 (9)	0.0041 (11)	−0.0151 (9)
C14	0.0697 (11)	0.0674 (11)	0.1112 (16)	0.0190 (8)	0.0325 (11)	0.0012 (10)
O1	0.0528 (6)	0.0465 (6)	0.0784 (8)	0.0039 (4)	0.0251 (5)	0.0034 (4)
O2	0.0566 (7)	0.0509 (6)	0.0723 (7)	−0.0033 (4)	0.0259 (6)	0.0017 (5)
O3	0.0724 (8)	0.0745 (8)	0.0967 (10)	−0.0108 (6)	0.0430 (7)	−0.0049 (6)

Geometric parameters (Å, º) top

C1—O1	1.3665 (17)	C7—C8	1.495 (3)
C1—C5	1.3869 (19)	C8—C9	1.496 (3)
C1—C12	1.390 (2)	C8—H8A	1.05 (2)
C2—O1	1.4608 (17)	C8—H8B	0.98 (2)
C2—C13	1.510 (3)	C9—C10	1.499 (2)
C2—C3	1.513 (3)	C9—H9A	1.08 (2)
C2—C14	1.516 (2)	C9—H9B	0.95 (2)
C3—C4	1.516 (2)	C10—C11	1.384 (2)
C3—H3A	0.96 (2)	C11—C12	1.377 (2)
C3—H3B	0.98 (2)	C11—H11	0.967 (18)
C4—C5	1.5025 (19)	C12—H12	0.936 (19)
C4—H4A	0.95 (2)	C13—H13A	0.9600
C4—H4B	1.03 (2)	C13—H13B	0.9600
C5—C6	1.385 (2)	C13—H13C	0.9600
C6—C10	1.382 (2)	C14—H14A	0.9600
C6—O2	1.3980 (17)	C14—H14B	0.9600
C7—O3	1.195 (2)	C14—H14C	0.9600
C7—O2	1.3576 (19)

O1—C1—C5	122.89 (13)	C7—C8—H8B	101.7 (13)
O1—C1—C12	116.28 (12)	C9—C8—H8B	112.6 (13)
C5—C1—C12	120.81 (13)	H8A—C8—H8B	116.1 (17)
O1—C2—C13	108.01 (14)	C8—C9—C10	109.71 (14)
O1—C2—C3	108.93 (13)	C8—C9—H9A	106.9 (11)
C13—C2—C3	112.76 (16)	C10—C9—H9A	111.5 (11)
O1—C2—C14	104.25 (13)	C8—C9—H9B	108.9 (12)
C13—C2—C14	111.91 (17)	C10—C9—H9B	110.6 (13)
C3—C2—C14	110.55 (16)	H9A—C9—H9B	109.1 (16)
C2—C3—C4	112.07 (14)	C6—C10—C11	116.82 (13)
C2—C3—H3A	104.6 (12)	C6—C10—C9	118.19 (14)
C4—C3—H3A	111.9 (11)	C11—C10—C9	124.93 (13)
C2—C3—H3B	107.2 (12)	C12—C11—C10	121.81 (13)
C4—C3—H3B	111.0 (12)	C12—C11—H11	118.3 (12)
H3A—C3—H3B	109.7 (15)	C10—C11—H11	119.9 (12)
C5—C4—C3	110.34 (13)	C11—C12—C1	119.46 (13)
C5—C4—H4A	108.8 (11)	C11—C12—H12	122.5 (11)
C3—C4—H4A	111.9 (12)	C1—C12—H12	118.0 (11)
C5—C4—H4B	107.2 (11)	C2—C13—H13A	109.5
C3—C4—H4B	108.8 (11)	C2—C13—H13B	109.5
H4A—C4—H4B	109.6 (16)	H13A—C13—H13B	109.5
C6—C5—C1	117.26 (13)	C2—C13—H13C	109.5
C6—C5—C4	121.51 (13)	H13A—C13—H13C	109.5
C1—C5—C4	121.18 (13)	H13B—C13—H13C	109.5
C10—C6—C5	123.78 (13)	C2—C14—H14A	109.5
C10—C6—O2	121.60 (13)	C2—C14—H14B	109.5
C5—C6—O2	114.55 (12)	H14A—C14—H14B	109.5
O3—C7—O2	117.36 (16)	C2—C14—H14C	109.5
O3—C7—C8	126.07 (15)	H14A—C14—H14C	109.5
O2—C7—C8	116.39 (14)	H14B—C14—H14C	109.5
C7—C8—C9	112.78 (15)	C1—O1—C2	117.74 (11)
C7—C8—H8A	111.0 (11)	C7—O2—C6	121.53 (13)
C9—C8—H8A	103.2 (12)

O1—C2—C3—C4	59.85 (19)	C5—C6—C10—C9	−175.60 (15)
C13—C2—C3—C4	−60.04 (19)	O2—C6—C10—C9	1.4 (2)
C14—C2—C3—C4	173.83 (14)	C8—C9—C10—C6	−32.6 (2)
C2—C3—C4—C5	−45.0 (2)	C8—C9—C10—C11	150.31 (17)
O1—C1—C5—C6	178.44 (12)	C6—C10—C11—C12	0.3 (2)
C12—C1—C5—C6	0.1 (2)	C9—C10—C11—C12	177.46 (14)
O1—C1—C5—C4	0.9 (2)	C10—C11—C12—C1	−2.0 (2)
C12—C1—C5—C4	−177.47 (15)	O1—C1—C12—C11	−176.63 (14)
C3—C4—C5—C6	−162.49 (15)	C5—C1—C12—C11	1.8 (2)
C3—C4—C5—C1	15.0 (2)	C5—C1—O1—C2	14.7 (2)
C1—C5—C6—C10	−2.0 (2)	C12—C1—O1—C2	−166.94 (14)
C4—C5—C6—C10	175.61 (15)	C13—C2—O1—C1	78.75 (18)
C1—C5—C6—O2	−179.11 (12)	C3—C2—O1—C1	−44.04 (18)
C4—C5—C6—O2	−1.5 (2)	C14—C2—O1—C1	−162.07 (15)
O3—C7—C8—C9	144.78 (19)	O3—C7—O2—C6	−176.80 (14)
O2—C7—C8—C9	−40.1 (2)	C8—C7—O2—C6	7.7 (2)
C7—C8—C9—C10	50.8 (2)	C10—C6—O2—C7	12.6 (2)
C5—C6—C10—C11	1.8 (2)	C5—C6—O2—C7	−170.16 (12)
O2—C6—C10—C11	178.73 (14)

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Professor Dr Hartmut, FG Strukturforschung, Material-und Geowissenschaften, Technische Universität Darmstadt, Germany, for his kind cooperation for providing diffractometer time.

References

Appendino, G., Bianchi, F., Bader, A., Campagnuolo, C., Fattorusso, E., Taglialatela-Scafati, O., Blanco-Molina, M., Macho, A., Fiebich, B. L., Bremner, P., Heinrich, M., Ballero, M. & Muñoz, E. (2004). J. Nat. Prod. 67, 532–536. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Bauri, A. K., Foro, S., Lindner, H.-J. & Nayak, S. K. (2006). Acta Cryst. E62, o1340–o1341. Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Bauri, A. K., Foro, S. & Rahman, A. F. M. M. (2017a). Acta Cryst. E73, 453–455. Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Bauri, A. K., Foro, S. & Rahman, A. F. M. M. (2017b). Acta Cryst. E73, 774–776. Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Chen, Y., Fan, G., Zhang, Q., Wu, H. & Wu, Y. (2007). J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 43, 926–936. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Chen, D., Wang, J., Jiang, Y., Zhou, T., Fan, G. & Wu, Y. (2009). J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 50, 695–702. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Conconi, M. T., Montesi, F. & Parnigotto, P. P. (1998). Basic Clin. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 82, 193–198. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Conforti, F., Marrelli, M., Menichini, F., Bonesi, M., Statti, G., Provenzano, E. & Menichini, F. (2009). Curr. Drug Ther. 4, 38–58. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Groom, C. R., Bruno, I. J., Lightfoot, M. P. & Ward, S. C. (2016). Acta Cryst. B72, 171–179. Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Kato, K. (1970). Acta Cryst. B26, 2022–2029. CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Web of Science Google Scholar
March, K. L., Patton, B. L., Wilensky, R. L. & Hathaway, D. R. (1993). Circulation, 87, 184–191. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Nonius (1996). CAD-4-PC. Enraf–Nonius, Delft, The Netherlands. Google Scholar
North, A. C. T., Phillips, D. C. & Mathews, F. S. (1968). Acta Cryst. A24, 351–359. CrossRef IUCr Journals Web of Science Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Spek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148–155. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Stoe & Cie (1987). REDU4. Stoe & Cie GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany. Google Scholar
Thailambal, V. G. & Pattabhi, V. (1987). Acta Cryst. C43, 2369–2372. CSD CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar