Download citation
Download citation
link to html
Pharmaceutical compounds are mostly developed as solid dosage forms containing a single-crystal form. It means that the selection of a particular crystal state for a given molecule is an important step for further clinical outlooks. In this context, piracetam, a pharmaceutical molecule known since the sixties for its nootropic properties, is considered in the present work. This molecule is analyzed using several experimental and theoretical approaches. First, the conformational space of the molecule has been systematically explored by performing a quantum mechanics scan of the two most relevant dihedral angles of the lateral chain. The predicted stable conformations have been compared to all the reported experimental geometries retrieved from the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD) covering polymorphs and cocrystals structures. In parallel, different batches of powders have been recrystallized. Under specific conditions, single crystals of polymorph (III) of piracetam have been obtained, an outcome confirmed by crystallographic analysis.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108768111045113/zb5018sup1.cif
Contains datablock I

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108768111045113/zb5018Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

pdf

Portable Document Format (PDF) file https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108768111045113/zb5018sup3.pdf
Extra figures and tables

CCDC reference: 861006

Computing details top

Data collection: CrysAlis PRO, Oxford Diffraction Ltd., Version 1.171.33.55 (release 05-01-2010 CrysAlis171 .NET) (compiled Jan 5 2010,16:28:46); cell refinement: CrysAlis PRO, Oxford Diffraction Ltd., Version 1.171.33.55 (release 05-01-2010 CrysAlis171 .NET) (compiled Jan 5 2010,16:28:46); data reduction: CrysAlis PRO, Oxford Diffraction Ltd., Version 1.171.33.55 (release 05-01-2010 CrysAlis171 .NET) (compiled Jan 5 2010,16:28:46); program(s) used to solve structure: Sir92; program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997).

Figures top
[Figure 1]
[Figure 2]
[Figure 3]
[Figure 4]
[Figure 5]
[Figure 6]
[Figure 7]
(I) top
Crystal data top
C6H10N2O2F(000) = 304
Mr = 142.16Dx = 1.379 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/nCu Kα radiation, λ = 1.54178 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ynCell parameters from 240 reflections
a = 6.503 (1) Åθ = 3.3–32.6°
b = 6.418 (1) ŵ = 0.88 mm1
c = 16.416 (3) ÅT = 290 K
β = 92.087 (4)°Prism, colorless
V = 684.7 (2) Å30.20 × 0.20 × 0.10 mm
Z = 4
Data collection top
Xcalibur, Ruby, Gemini ultra
diffractometer
1202 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1132 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Mirror monochromatorRint = 0.011
Detector resolution: 10.3712 pixels mm-1θmax = 67.4°, θmin = 5.4°
ω scansh = 77
Absorption correction: multi-scan
CrysAlis PRO, Oxford Diffraction Ltd., Version 1.171.33.55 (release 05-01-2010 CrysAlis171 .NET) (compiled Jan 5 2010,16:28:46) Empirical absorption correction using spherical harmonics, implemented in SCALE3 ABSPACK scaling algorithm.
k = 67
Tmin = 0.844, Tmax = 0.918l = 1819
4113 measured reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.035H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.099 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0568P)2 + 0.1732P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.06(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
1202 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.17 e Å3
100 parametersΔρmin = 0.15 e Å3
0 restraintsExtinction correction: SHELXL, Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction coefficient: 0.0125 (19)
Crystal data top
C6H10N2O2V = 684.7 (2) Å3
Mr = 142.16Z = 4
Monoclinic, P21/nCu Kα radiation
a = 6.503 (1) ŵ = 0.88 mm1
b = 6.418 (1) ÅT = 290 K
c = 16.416 (3) Å0.20 × 0.20 × 0.10 mm
β = 92.087 (4)°
Data collection top
Xcalibur, Ruby, Gemini ultra
diffractometer
1202 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
CrysAlis PRO, Oxford Diffraction Ltd., Version 1.171.33.55 (release 05-01-2010 CrysAlis171 .NET) (compiled Jan 5 2010,16:28:46) Empirical absorption correction using spherical harmonics, implemented in SCALE3 ABSPACK scaling algorithm.
1132 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.844, Tmax = 0.918Rint = 0.011
4113 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0350 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.099H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.06Δρmax = 0.17 e Å3
1202 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.15 e Å3
100 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.00810 (19)0.0656 (2)0.33350 (7)0.0360 (3)
C20.1112 (2)0.1109 (2)0.36898 (9)0.0475 (4)
H2A0.20240.17310.32770.057*
H2B0.19280.06180.41340.057*
C30.0476 (2)0.2675 (3)0.39962 (11)0.0549 (4)
H3A0.04090.39320.36680.066*
H3B0.02470.30420.45590.066*
C40.2551 (2)0.1614 (2)0.39235 (9)0.0448 (4)
H4A0.31390.12600.44570.054*
H4B0.35040.25080.36460.054*
C50.36723 (19)0.1752 (2)0.32861 (8)0.0370 (3)
H5A0.31720.26950.28620.044*
H5B0.48670.10340.30880.044*
C60.43039 (18)0.30059 (19)0.40419 (8)0.0347 (3)
N10.20996 (15)0.02533 (16)0.34489 (6)0.0346 (3)
N20.61342 (18)0.3920 (2)0.40293 (8)0.0439 (3)
O10.06305 (14)0.22136 (17)0.29894 (6)0.0490 (3)
O20.31260 (15)0.31870 (17)0.46039 (6)0.0488 (3)
H2C0.699 (3)0.362 (3)0.3646 (11)0.052 (5)*
H2D0.654 (3)0.480 (3)0.4443 (13)0.063 (5)*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.0350 (7)0.0411 (7)0.0318 (6)0.0047 (5)0.0014 (5)0.0042 (5)
C20.0371 (7)0.0512 (9)0.0545 (8)0.0033 (6)0.0038 (6)0.0018 (7)
C30.0507 (9)0.0451 (8)0.0692 (11)0.0022 (7)0.0047 (7)0.0126 (7)
C40.0425 (8)0.0399 (8)0.0518 (8)0.0040 (6)0.0029 (6)0.0078 (6)
C50.0349 (7)0.0417 (7)0.0345 (7)0.0007 (5)0.0047 (5)0.0017 (5)
C60.0338 (6)0.0325 (7)0.0378 (7)0.0019 (5)0.0034 (5)0.0029 (5)
N10.0322 (5)0.0341 (6)0.0373 (6)0.0018 (4)0.0000 (4)0.0002 (4)
N20.0378 (6)0.0458 (7)0.0485 (7)0.0071 (5)0.0083 (5)0.0081 (5)
O10.0422 (6)0.0523 (6)0.0526 (6)0.0122 (4)0.0015 (4)0.0097 (5)
O20.0458 (6)0.0557 (7)0.0459 (6)0.0102 (5)0.0140 (4)0.0118 (5)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
C1—O11.2315 (17)C4—H4A0.9700
C1—N11.3443 (16)C4—H4B0.9700
C1—C21.502 (2)C5—N11.4361 (16)
C2—C31.514 (2)C5—C61.5228 (18)
C2—H2A0.9700C5—H5A0.9700
C2—H2B0.9700C5—H5B0.9700
C3—C41.520 (2)C6—O21.2259 (16)
C3—H3A0.9700C6—N21.3279 (17)
C3—H3B0.9700N2—H2C0.878 (19)
C4—N11.4537 (17)N2—H2D0.91 (2)
O1—C1—N1124.66 (12)N1—C4—H4B110.9
O1—C1—C2126.88 (12)C3—C4—H4B110.9
N1—C1—C2108.46 (11)H4A—C4—H4B108.9
C1—C2—C3105.88 (11)N1—C5—C6112.03 (10)
C1—C2—H2A110.6N1—C5—H5A109.2
C3—C2—H2A110.6C6—C5—H5A109.2
C1—C2—H2B110.6N1—C5—H5B109.2
C3—C2—H2B110.6C6—C5—H5B109.2
H2A—C2—H2B108.7H5A—C5—H5B107.9
C2—C3—C4105.87 (12)O2—C6—N2123.70 (12)
C2—C3—H3A110.6O2—C6—C5120.39 (11)
C4—C3—H3A110.6N2—C6—C5115.86 (11)
C2—C3—H3B110.6C1—N1—C5122.95 (11)
C4—C3—H3B110.6C1—N1—C4114.20 (11)
H3A—C3—H3B108.7C5—N1—C4121.39 (10)
N1—C4—C3104.42 (11)C6—N2—H2C120.5 (11)
N1—C4—H4A110.9C6—N2—H2D119.7 (11)
C3—C4—H4A110.9H2C—N2—H2D119.7 (16)
O1—C1—C2—C3176.77 (14)C2—C1—N1—C5171.00 (12)
N1—C1—C2—C32.66 (15)O1—C1—N1—C4175.91 (12)
C1—C2—C3—C48.34 (17)C2—C1—N1—C44.65 (15)
C2—C3—C4—N110.69 (16)C6—C5—N1—C193.02 (14)
N1—C5—C6—O223.18 (17)C6—C5—N1—C472.38 (15)
N1—C5—C6—N2159.25 (11)C3—C4—N1—C19.85 (16)
O1—C1—N1—C59.56 (19)C3—C4—N1—C5176.44 (12)

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC6H10N2O2
Mr142.16
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/n
Temperature (K)290
a, b, c (Å)6.503 (1), 6.418 (1), 16.416 (3)
β (°) 92.087 (4)
V3)684.7 (2)
Z4
Radiation typeCu Kα
µ (mm1)0.88
Crystal size (mm)0.20 × 0.20 × 0.10
Data collection
DiffractometerXcalibur, Ruby, Gemini ultra
diffractometer
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
CrysAlis PRO, Oxford Diffraction Ltd., Version 1.171.33.55 (release 05-01-2010 CrysAlis171 .NET) (compiled Jan 5 2010,16:28:46) Empirical absorption correction using spherical harmonics, implemented in SCALE3 ABSPACK scaling algorithm.
Tmin, Tmax0.844, 0.918
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
4113, 1202, 1132
Rint0.011
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.599
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.035, 0.099, 1.06
No. of reflections1202
No. of parameters100
H-atom treatmentH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.17, 0.15

Computer programs: CrysAlis PRO, Oxford Diffraction Ltd., Version 1.171.33.55 (release 05-01-2010 CrysAlis171 .NET) (compiled Jan 5 2010,16:28:46), Sir92, SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997).

 

Follow Acta Cryst. B
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds