Download citation
Download citation
link to html
The title AgI coordination polymer, [Ag(C15H14NS2)]n, was synthesized by a solvothermal reaction of AgNO3 with sodium N,N-dibenzyl­dithio­carbamate in a methanol solution. The compound displays a helical structure and each AgI ion is four-coordinated by four S atoms from two dithiocarbamate ligands and can be described as a distorted tetrahedral configuration. While the AgI ions are bridged by both S atoms of the dithocarbamate group to form the polymeric structure, the Ag...Ag distance of 3.0633 (11) Å suggests weaker metal bonding between AgI ions.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807035180/xu2287sup1.cif
Contains datablocks I, global

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807035180/xu2287Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

CCDC reference: 661674

Key indicators

  • Single-crystal X-ray study
  • T = 293 K
  • Mean [sigma](C-C) = 0.014 Å
  • R factor = 0.045
  • wR factor = 0.080
  • Data-to-parameter ratio = 14.5

checkCIF/PLATON results

No syntax errors found



Alert level C PLAT241_ALERT_2_C Check High Ueq as Compared to Neighbors for Ag1 PLAT342_ALERT_3_C Low Bond Precision on C-C Bonds (x 1000) Ang ... 14
Alert level G REFLT03_ALERT_4_G Please check that the estimate of the number of Friedel pairs is correct. If it is not, please give the correct count in the _publ_section_exptl_refinement section of the submitted CIF. From the CIF: _diffrn_reflns_theta_max 25.20 From the CIF: _reflns_number_total 2500 Count of symmetry unique reflns 1263 Completeness (_total/calc) 197.94% TEST3: Check Friedels for noncentro structure Estimate of Friedel pairs measured 1237 Fraction of Friedel pairs measured 0.979 Are heavy atom types Z>Si present yes PLAT199_ALERT_1_G Check the Reported _cell_measurement_temperature 293 K PLAT200_ALERT_1_G Check the Reported _diffrn_ambient_temperature . 293 K PLAT794_ALERT_5_G Check Predicted Bond Valency for Ag1 (1) 1.02 PLAT860_ALERT_3_G Note: Number of Least-Squares Restraints ....... 1
0 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem 0 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem 2 ALERT level C = Check and explain 5 ALERT level G = General alerts; check 2 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 1 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 2 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 1 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion 1 ALERT type 5 Informative message, check

Comment top

Synthesis and crystal structure of the Ag(I) complexes with dialkyldithiocarbamates have been widely studied owing to variable coordination configurations since the first description by Akerström (1959). Monomeric, dimeric, hexameric and polymeric structure etc in the Ag(I) complexes have been reported in the past decade years, which was indicated that differently substituted alkyl groups and reaction conditions may play crucial roles in the formation of a variety of complexes with unprecedented structures (Zhang et al., 2002; Liu et al., 2006; Song et al., 2006). We have maintained an interest in silver(I)-dithiocarbamate complexes and report herein the structure of the title compound, [(AgC15H14NS2)3]n.

In the solid state, the title complex has a one-dimensional chain-like polymeric structure and the each repeated Ag(I) units consists of three silver(I) cations and three ligand anions (Fig. 1). Each Ag(I) cation is coordinated with four sulfur atoms from three N,N-dibenzyldithiocarbamate (DBTC) ligands and shown as an distorted tetrahedral coordination environment. There are two types of sulfur atoms: S1 and the symmetry equivalents are acting as bridges between each two silver atoms with Ag—S distances of 2.446 (1) and 2.478 (2) Å (Table 1). On the other hand, the distances between the Ag(I) atoms and the S2 atoms (2.860 and 3.010 Å) are appreciably different, and both are much longer than the Ag—S(dithiocarbamate) distances [2.5–2.6 Å] (Song et al., 2006; Yin et al., 2007), but smaller Ag1—C1—S1 angles of 94.92° suggests the weaker Ag1—S2 bonding in the compound, as pointed out by Li et al. (2005). This grees with the related compounds reported previously [Anacker-Eickhoff et al., 1982; Song et al., 2006]. Thus the DBTC displays both roles of chelating ligand and asym-bridging ligand.

The Ag—Ag distances between adjacent AgI ions are 3.0633 (11) Å, which are longer than 2.886 Å found in metallic Ag (Greenwood et al., 1989) but shorter than the sum of the van der Waals radii of Ag atoms. This may suggest the existence of the weaker metal bonding between AgI ions (Tang et al., 2004). So multi-dentate bridging coordination modes of the chelating ligands and the agentophilic Ag—Ag interactions linked in the [(AgC15H14NS2)3] units leads to formation of the one-dimensional chain-like coordination polymer (Fig. 2).

Related literature top

For general background, see Akerström (1959); Zhang et al. (2002); Liu et al. (2006); Song et al. (2006). For related structures, see: Yin et al. (2007); Anacker-Eickhoff et al. (1982); Li et al. (2005); Greenwood & Earnshaw (1989). For synthesis, see: Fan et al. (2004).

For related literature, see: Tang et al. (2004).

Experimental top

The title compound was prepared by the reaction of AgNO3 (0.170 g, 1.0 mmol), sodium N, N-dibenzyldithiocardbanmate (NaDBTC) (0.296 g, 2.0 mmol) (Fan et al., 2004) and anhydrous methanol (7 ml) in an 15 ml Teflon liner sealed in a Parr autoclave. The autoclave was placed in a programmable furnace and heated to 353 K for 2 days. Yellow crystals were obtained after cooling to room temperature at 5 K.h-1 (yield 50%). The compound is hardly soluble in general organic solvent.

Refinement top

All H atoms were placed in calculated positions with C—H = 0.93 Å (aromatic) and 0.97 Å (methylene) and refined in riding mode with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C).

Structure description top

Synthesis and crystal structure of the Ag(I) complexes with dialkyldithiocarbamates have been widely studied owing to variable coordination configurations since the first description by Akerström (1959). Monomeric, dimeric, hexameric and polymeric structure etc in the Ag(I) complexes have been reported in the past decade years, which was indicated that differently substituted alkyl groups and reaction conditions may play crucial roles in the formation of a variety of complexes with unprecedented structures (Zhang et al., 2002; Liu et al., 2006; Song et al., 2006). We have maintained an interest in silver(I)-dithiocarbamate complexes and report herein the structure of the title compound, [(AgC15H14NS2)3]n.

In the solid state, the title complex has a one-dimensional chain-like polymeric structure and the each repeated Ag(I) units consists of three silver(I) cations and three ligand anions (Fig. 1). Each Ag(I) cation is coordinated with four sulfur atoms from three N,N-dibenzyldithiocarbamate (DBTC) ligands and shown as an distorted tetrahedral coordination environment. There are two types of sulfur atoms: S1 and the symmetry equivalents are acting as bridges between each two silver atoms with Ag—S distances of 2.446 (1) and 2.478 (2) Å (Table 1). On the other hand, the distances between the Ag(I) atoms and the S2 atoms (2.860 and 3.010 Å) are appreciably different, and both are much longer than the Ag—S(dithiocarbamate) distances [2.5–2.6 Å] (Song et al., 2006; Yin et al., 2007), but smaller Ag1—C1—S1 angles of 94.92° suggests the weaker Ag1—S2 bonding in the compound, as pointed out by Li et al. (2005). This grees with the related compounds reported previously [Anacker-Eickhoff et al., 1982; Song et al., 2006]. Thus the DBTC displays both roles of chelating ligand and asym-bridging ligand.

The Ag—Ag distances between adjacent AgI ions are 3.0633 (11) Å, which are longer than 2.886 Å found in metallic Ag (Greenwood et al., 1989) but shorter than the sum of the van der Waals radii of Ag atoms. This may suggest the existence of the weaker metal bonding between AgI ions (Tang et al., 2004). So multi-dentate bridging coordination modes of the chelating ligands and the agentophilic Ag—Ag interactions linked in the [(AgC15H14NS2)3] units leads to formation of the one-dimensional chain-like coordination polymer (Fig. 2).

For general background, see Akerström (1959); Zhang et al. (2002); Liu et al. (2006); Song et al. (2006). For related structures, see: Yin et al. (2007); Anacker-Eickhoff et al. (1982); Li et al. (2005); Greenwood & Earnshaw (1989). For synthesis, see: Fan et al. (2004).

For related literature, see: Tang et al. (2004).

Computing details top

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, YEAR?); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 1999); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Bruker, 1998); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL; molecular graphics: SHELXTL; software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL.

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The molecular structure of the title compound with 50% probability displacement ellipsoids.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. The packing diagram of the title compound viewed down the b axis (H atoms have been omitted for clarity).
Poly[(µ3-N,N-dibenzyldithiocarbamato-κ4S,S':S:S')silver(I)] top
Crystal data top
[Ag(C15H14NS2)]Dx = 1.782 Mg m3
Mr = 380.26Melting point = 491–492 K
Trigonal, P31Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: P 31Cell parameters from 2450 reflections
a = 15.6505 (19) Åθ = 2.4–25.0°
c = 5.0120 (14) ŵ = 1.70 mm1
V = 1063.2 (3) Å3T = 293 K
Z = 3Block, yellow
F(000) = 5700.15 × 0.10 × 0.10 mm
Data collection top
Bruker SMART APEXII CCD area-detector
diffractometer
2500 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1519 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.094
φ and ω scansθmax = 25.2°, θmin = 1.5°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 2002)
h = 1818
Tmin = 0.785, Tmax = 0.848k = 1818
7409 measured reflectionsl = 66
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.045H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.080 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2)]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.00(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
2500 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.46 e Å3
172 parametersΔρmin = 0.41 e Å3
1 restraintAbsolute structure: Flack (1983), with 1227 Friedel pairs
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsAbsolute structure parameter: 0.07 (5)
Crystal data top
[Ag(C15H14NS2)]Z = 3
Mr = 380.26Mo Kα radiation
Trigonal, P31µ = 1.70 mm1
a = 15.6505 (19) ÅT = 293 K
c = 5.0120 (14) Å0.15 × 0.10 × 0.10 mm
V = 1063.2 (3) Å3
Data collection top
Bruker SMART APEXII CCD area-detector
diffractometer
2500 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 2002)
1519 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.785, Tmax = 0.848Rint = 0.094
7409 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.045H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.080Δρmax = 0.46 e Å3
S = 1.00Δρmin = 0.41 e Å3
2500 reflectionsAbsolute structure: Flack (1983), with 1227 Friedel pairs
172 parametersAbsolute structure parameter: 0.07 (5)
1 restraint
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C11.0066 (5)0.2099 (6)0.5559 (15)0.0355 (19)
C21.0318 (6)0.3398 (6)0.8847 (15)0.043 (2)
H2A0.98700.33011.03030.051*
H2B1.08250.32730.95280.051*
C31.0786 (5)0.4436 (6)0.7943 (16)0.039 (2)
C41.0607 (7)0.5107 (7)0.9319 (19)0.053 (2)
H41.01650.48941.07390.064*
C51.1086 (8)0.6088 (7)0.857 (2)0.067 (3)
H51.09630.65290.95040.081*
C61.1742 (7)0.6428 (7)0.646 (2)0.069 (3)
H61.20700.70920.60050.083*
C71.1905 (7)0.5768 (8)0.506 (2)0.064 (3)
H71.23350.59800.36130.077*
C81.1424 (7)0.4788 (6)0.5810 (17)0.051 (2)
H81.15370.43470.48350.062*
C90.8849 (6)0.2674 (6)0.5893 (16)0.041 (2)
H9A0.86270.23420.41870.049*
H9B0.89970.33500.56670.049*
C100.8041 (6)0.2174 (6)0.7892 (17)0.040 (2)
C110.7728 (6)0.2713 (7)0.9324 (17)0.050 (2)
H110.80280.33890.90360.059*
C120.6973 (6)0.2274 (7)1.1197 (18)0.054 (3)
H120.67660.26491.21470.065*
C130.6544 (7)0.1282 (8)1.161 (2)0.060 (3)
H130.60400.09761.28530.072*
C140.6844 (6)0.0740 (7)1.0219 (19)0.052 (3)
H140.65390.00631.05150.063*
C150.7590 (7)0.1168 (6)0.8386 (18)0.052 (2)
H150.77940.07850.74710.062*
N10.9764 (4)0.2672 (4)0.6704 (13)0.0360 (16)
S10.93514 (15)0.12847 (14)0.3071 (5)0.0439 (5)
S21.11785 (16)0.21987 (18)0.6397 (5)0.0543 (7)
Ag11.07051 (5)0.10767 (5)0.12225 (17)0.0688 (3)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.023 (4)0.036 (5)0.045 (5)0.012 (4)0.005 (4)0.006 (4)
C20.050 (6)0.040 (5)0.032 (5)0.018 (5)0.000 (4)0.012 (4)
C30.036 (5)0.038 (5)0.038 (5)0.016 (4)0.006 (4)0.006 (4)
C40.051 (5)0.039 (6)0.060 (6)0.016 (5)0.002 (5)0.004 (5)
C50.081 (8)0.054 (7)0.073 (8)0.038 (6)0.014 (7)0.012 (6)
C60.056 (7)0.047 (7)0.085 (9)0.010 (6)0.007 (6)0.022 (6)
C70.050 (6)0.067 (7)0.056 (7)0.015 (6)0.001 (5)0.016 (6)
C80.063 (6)0.034 (5)0.047 (6)0.016 (5)0.005 (5)0.008 (5)
C90.046 (5)0.035 (5)0.048 (6)0.024 (4)0.004 (5)0.008 (4)
C100.038 (5)0.053 (6)0.040 (5)0.032 (5)0.003 (4)0.010 (5)
C110.044 (5)0.057 (6)0.057 (6)0.033 (5)0.009 (5)0.009 (5)
C120.057 (6)0.067 (7)0.061 (7)0.048 (6)0.018 (5)0.006 (5)
C130.056 (6)0.071 (7)0.058 (7)0.037 (6)0.020 (5)0.017 (6)
C140.041 (6)0.040 (5)0.071 (7)0.016 (5)0.001 (5)0.008 (5)
C150.063 (6)0.050 (6)0.048 (6)0.033 (5)0.008 (5)0.006 (5)
N10.034 (4)0.033 (4)0.045 (4)0.019 (3)0.003 (4)0.004 (3)
S10.0467 (14)0.0406 (13)0.0462 (13)0.0232 (12)0.0014 (11)0.0026 (12)
S20.0424 (14)0.0696 (18)0.0624 (17)0.0367 (14)0.0043 (12)0.0062 (14)
Ag10.0639 (5)0.0686 (6)0.0880 (5)0.0438 (5)0.0161 (5)0.0017 (5)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
C1—N11.336 (9)C9—H9B0.9700
C1—S21.720 (8)C10—C111.370 (11)
C1—S11.734 (8)C10—C151.387 (10)
C2—C31.480 (10)C11—C121.392 (11)
C2—N11.487 (9)C11—H110.9300
C2—H2A0.9700C12—C131.365 (11)
C2—H2B0.9700C12—H120.9300
C3—C81.376 (10)C13—C141.350 (12)
C3—C41.398 (12)C13—H130.9300
C4—C51.381 (13)C14—C151.369 (11)
C4—H40.9300C14—H140.9300
C5—C61.380 (13)C15—H150.9300
C5—H50.9300S1—Ag1i2.446 (2)
C6—C71.375 (13)S1—Ag12.478 (2)
C6—H60.9300S2—Ag13.010 (2)
C7—C81.381 (12)S2—Ag1ii2.860 (2)
C7—H70.9300Ag1—S1iii2.446 (2)
C8—H80.9300Ag1—S2iv2.860 (2)
C9—N11.489 (9)Ag1—Ag1iii3.0633 (11)
C9—C101.493 (10)Ag1—Ag1i3.0633 (11)
C9—H9A0.9700
N1—C1—S2121.1 (6)C11—C10—C9119.9 (8)
N1—C1—S1119.2 (6)C15—C10—C9122.1 (8)
S2—C1—S1119.6 (5)C10—C11—C12121.8 (8)
C3—C2—N1113.4 (6)C10—C11—H11119.1
C3—C2—H2A108.9C12—C11—H11119.1
N1—C2—H2A108.9C13—C12—C11118.4 (8)
C3—C2—H2B108.9C13—C12—H12120.8
N1—C2—H2B108.9C11—C12—H12120.8
H2A—C2—H2B107.7C14—C13—C12120.7 (9)
C8—C3—C4117.5 (8)C14—C13—H13119.7
C8—C3—C2122.6 (8)C12—C13—H13119.7
C4—C3—C2119.9 (8)C13—C14—C15121.1 (9)
C5—C4—C3120.0 (9)C13—C14—H14119.4
C5—C4—H4120.0C15—C14—H14119.4
C3—C4—H4120.0C14—C15—C10120.1 (8)
C6—C5—C4121.5 (10)C14—C15—H15120.0
C6—C5—H5119.3C10—C15—H15120.0
C4—C5—H5119.3C1—N1—C2123.8 (6)
C7—C6—C5119.0 (9)C1—N1—C9123.2 (6)
C7—C6—H6120.5C2—N1—C9113.0 (6)
C5—C6—H6120.5C1—S1—Ag1i107.1 (3)
C6—C7—C8119.5 (9)C1—S1—Ag194.9 (3)
C6—C7—H7120.3Ag1i—S1—Ag176.92 (6)
C8—C7—H7120.3C1—S2—Ag1ii102.2 (2)
C3—C8—C7122.6 (9)S1iii—Ag1—S1171.87 (8)
C3—C8—H8118.7S1iii—Ag1—S2iv85.02 (8)
C7—C8—H8118.7S1—Ag1—S2iv102.21 (7)
N1—C9—C10112.3 (6)S1iii—Ag1—Ag1iii52.01 (6)
N1—C9—H9A109.1S1—Ag1—Ag1iii123.76 (6)
C10—C9—H9A109.1S2iv—Ag1—Ag1iii88.38 (5)
N1—C9—H9B109.1S1iii—Ag1—Ag1i120.83 (6)
C10—C9—H9B109.1S1—Ag1—Ag1i51.07 (5)
H9A—C9—H9B107.9S2iv—Ag1—Ag1i140.89 (5)
C11—C10—C15118.0 (8)Ag1iii—Ag1—Ag1i86.91 (2)
Symmetry codes: (i) y+1, xy1, z+1/3; (ii) x, y, z+1; (iii) x+y+2, x+1, z1/3; (iv) x, y, z1.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula[Ag(C15H14NS2)]
Mr380.26
Crystal system, space groupTrigonal, P31
Temperature (K)293
a, c (Å)15.6505 (19), 5.0120 (14)
V3)1063.2 (3)
Z3
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)1.70
Crystal size (mm)0.15 × 0.10 × 0.10
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker SMART APEXII CCD area-detector
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 2002)
Tmin, Tmax0.785, 0.848
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
7409, 2500, 1519
Rint0.094
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.599
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.045, 0.080, 1.00
No. of reflections2500
No. of parameters172
No. of restraints1
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.46, 0.41
Absolute structureFlack (1983), with 1227 Friedel pairs
Absolute structure parameter0.07 (5)

Computer programs: APEX2 (Bruker, YEAR?), SAINT (Bruker, 1999), SAINT, SHELXTL (Bruker, 1998), SHELXTL.

Selected bond lengths (Å) top
C1—N11.336 (9)S1—Ag12.478 (2)
C1—S21.720 (8)S2—Ag13.010 (2)
C1—S11.734 (8)S2—Ag1ii2.860 (2)
S1—Ag1i2.446 (2)Ag1—Ag1i3.0633 (11)
Symmetry codes: (i) y+1, xy1, z+1/3; (ii) x, y, z+1.
 

Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds