Download citation
Download citation
link to html
The title bis­(1,3,4-trimethyl­pyridinium) tetra­halidocuprate(II) structures, (C8H12N)2[CuCl4], (I), and (C8H12N)2[CuBr4], (II), respectively, consist of flattened [CuX4]2- tetra­hedral complex anions and planar 1,3,4-trimethyl­pyridinium cations. Chloride compound (I) is a rare example of an A2CuCl4 structure with an elongated unit cell in the polar space group Fdd2. The [CuCl4]2- anions have twofold rotational symmetry and are arranged in distorted hexa­gonal close-packed (hcp) layers, which are inter­leaved with layers of cations, each in a four-layer repeat sequence, to generate the elongated axis. The organic cations stack along [101] or [10\overline{1}] in alternating layers. The methyl groups meta on the cation ring and the larger of the trans Cl-Cu-Cl angles both face the same direction along the polar axis and are the most prominent features determining the polarity of the structure. Bromide compound (II) crystallizes in a centrosymmetric structure with a similar layer structure but with only a two-layer repeat sequence. Here, symmetry-inequivalent cations are segregated into alternating layers with cations, forming hcp layers of inversion-related cation pairs in one layer and parallel stacks of cations in the other. The change in space group when the larger Br- ion is present suggests that the 1,3,4-trimethyl­pyridinium ion has a minimal size to allow the Fdd2 A2CuX4 structure type.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270109023968/su3035sup1.cif
Contains datablocks global, I, II

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270109023968/su3035Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270109023968/su3035IIsup3.hkl
Contains datablock II

CCDC references: 746036; 746037

Comment top

The structural chemistry of halidocuprate compounds with an A2CuX4 stoichiometry is rich, ranging from layer perovskite structures, in which the copper(II) ion possesses an elongated octahedral geometry (Long et al., 1997), to thermochromic compounds with isolated square-planar CuCl42- anions in the low-temperature phase, which transform into flattened tetrahedral anions at higher temperature (Riley et al., 1998). Isolated CuX42- anions with a compressed or flattened tetrahedral geometry are well known and by themselves merit little comment. However, A2CuX4 compounds with isolated CuX42- ions are, in many cases, found to crystallize in complicated extended structures. A2CuCl4 compounds with high-symmetry cations, such as (CH3)4N+ (Gesi, 1982) and (CH3)4P+ (Pressprich et al., 1989; Nishijima & Mashiyama, 2000), exhibit commensurately and incommensurately modulated superstructures. Larger high-symmetry cations, such as (CH3)4As+ and (CH3)4Sb+, yield compounds that crystallize in high-symmetry tetragonal or cubic space groups with, in some cases, commensurate modulations (Pressprich et al., 1991, 2002). The low-symmetry (C2H5)2NH2+ cation produces an elongated unit cell with three unique CuCl42- anions in which the degree of flattening varies dramatically at low temperature (Willett & Twamley, 2007), while undergoing a thermochromic phase transition at higher temperature to a smaller unit cell with two unique CuCl42- anions (Bloomquist et al., 1988).

A rare A2CuX4 structure type with an elongated cell in space group Fdd2 was first reported by Pauling (1966) for [(C6H5)3CH3As]2CuX4 (X = Cl or Br). Although no structure was determined, this structure type is unique from the cubic P213 structures found for other first-row transition metals. Later, the [(C6H5)3CH3P]2CuCl4 structure was determined (El Essawi, 1997), with unit-cell constants differing only slightly from those for the arsonium analogue. Here, the corresponding tetrachloridomangate and tetrachloridocobaltate salts were also found to crystallize in cubic unit cells with cell-axis lengths close to those found in their arsonium analogues. More recently, the {Cu[H3C5N(CH2NiPr2)2]Cl}2CuCl4 structure has been reported (Vedernikov et al., 2002) with the longest elongated unit-cell axis in this class, 56.083 (2) Å compared with values of 32.27 (2) and 32.791 Å, respectively, for the two previously mentioned chloride structures.

Compound (I) crystallizes at room temperature in space group Fdd2 with an elongated unit-cell axis of 35.3359 (7) Å, and it is the newest addition to this structure type. The structures of the organic cation and complex anion are illustrated in Fig. 1. The bond lengths and angles for the organic cation agree with expected values (Reference for standard values?). Bond lengths and angles for the complex anion are presented in Table 1. The CuCl42- anion in (I) possesses twofold rotation symmetry about c. The trans-Cl—Cu—Cl angles of 129.41 (5)° for Cl1—Cu1—Cl1i and 134.79 (4)° for Cl2—Cu1—Cl2i [symmetry code: (i) 1/2 - x, 1/2 - y, z] are typical for isolated CuCl42- anions in the absence of strong hydrogen bonding from the organic cation. The shortest H···Cl contacts in this structure are long (ca 2.77–2.78 Å) with unfavourable C—H···Cl angles (ca 145°), thus supporting the notion that strong hydrogen bonding is absent. The twofold rotation axis bisects the two large trans-Cl—Cu—Cl angles, with the smaller trans angle facing the positive c-axis direction and the larger facing the negative c-axis direction.

The organic cations and complex anions in (I) are separated into interleaved layers that stack parallel to [010], with a four-layer repeat sequence for each. Within the anionic layer, the complexes pack in a distorted hcp arrangement, with an a- to c-axis length ratio of 1.517, less than the ideal value of 1.732. All the anions within the layer are translationally equivalent with the Cl1—Cu1—Cl2 plane, almost parallel to (101), and the Cli—Cu1—Cl2i plane, almost parallel to (101). Neighbouring layers are related by a diamond glide-plane operation perpendicular to [100], such that successive diamond glide-plane operations generate the four-layer repeat sequence that yields the long b axis of the unit cell. The large trans-Cl—Cu—Cl angles define planes that are almost at 45° to the a- and b-axes [the Cl1—Cu1—Cl1i plane forms an angle of 50.22 (2)°, and the Cl2—Cu1—Cl2i plane forms an angle of 40.19 (2)°, both with respect to the b axis]. The diamond glide-plane operation switches the orientation of these two planes in neighbouring anion layers.

Within the cation layer, the long axis of the cation, from the N atom to the opposite C atom in the ring, is almost parallel [7.42 (7)°] to [010] and hence almost perpendicular to the layer plane. This places the methyl group, in the meta-position in the ring, within the layer. The methyl groups in the meta-positions for all the cations all face in the negative c-axis direction, another consequence of the polar space-group symmetry. The C3—C31 bond forms an angle of 26.54 (15)° with respect to c, and angles of 73.05 (15) and 70.20 (16)° with respect to axes a and b. The direction of the C3—C31 bond differs from cation to cation, but the component of the bond relative to c is the same for all. The methyl group attached to the N atom on the cation ring penetrates into the anionic layer. Since the N atom is formally the seat of positive charge on the cation, this would place the N atom close to the formally negative Cl- ions of the complex. The shortest N···Cl contact distance is 3.777 (2) Å to Cl1.

The cation layer consists of parallel stacks of aromatic rings along [101] or, in alternating layers, along [101] with complex anions nesting in voids between cation stacks. Neighbouring cations in a stack are related by a d-glide operation perpendicular to b, with a distance of 3.9652 (1) Å between cation planes. The cations are staggered in the stack so that the C atom in the para-position in the ring sits approximately above the centres of the two neighbouring rings. Neighbouring stacks in the layer can be related by lattice translations. A packing diagram viewed parallel to [101], showing the layered structure and looking down the stacks of organic cations in two of the layers, is presented in Fig. 2.

Cation stacking along [101 and [101] also occurs in the [(C6H5)3CH3P]2CuCl4 structure, where two different phenyl rings of the cation form facing pairs with phenyl rings on two neighbouring cations. The bulky iPr groups in {Cu[H3C5N(CH2NiPr2)2]Cl}2CuCl4 prevent phenyl ring stacking, but similar stacks can be discerned in which the iPr groups of neighbouring cations abut. The [(C6H5)3CH3P]2CuCl4 and {Cu[H3C5N(CH2NiPr2)2]Cl}2CuCl4 structures both have the four-layer repeat sequence and twofold rotational symmetry of the CuCl42- ion, as in (I). However, the twofold axis in these cases bisects smaller Cl—Cu—Cl angles so that the compression axis of the flattened tetrahedron is not perpendicular to the elongated axis of the unit cell. In this manner the larger aspect of the flattened CuCl42- ion is placed more within the anion layer, so as to accomodate better the spacing enforced by the bulkier cations. The compression axis is most closely aligned with the elongated axis in the [(C6H5)3CH3P]2CuCl4 structure, while the CuCl42- ion has the largest Cl—Cu—Cl angle in the {Cu[H3C5N(CH2NiPr2)2]Cl}2CuCl4 structure. This variation in orientation and structure of the CuCl42- ion suggests that cation stacking determines a structure type in which the stereochemical flexibility of the CuCl42- ion allows it to occupy voids that a regular tetrahedral complex could not.

The structure of the corresponding bromide compound, (II), offers an interesting contrast, since it does not crystallize in space group Fdd2. Instead it is found to crystallize in the monoclinic space group P21/c with the longest unit-cell axis, a, about half as long as the elongated axis in the choride salt. The structures of the organic cation and complex anion in (II) are presented in Fig. 3. Bond lengths and angles of the organic cation agree with expected values (Reference for standard values?). Bond lengths and angles for the complex ion are presented in Table 2. The extended structure in (II) has interleaved layers of CuBr42- anions and of organic cations that stack along a, each in a two-layer repeat sequence. Within the anion layer, the complexes pack in an hcp arrangement, although with a b/c axis-length ratio of 1.775, which is less distorted from the ideal value (1.732) than in (I). Within the layer, two neighbouring complexes are related by c-axis translations and the other four by c-glide-plane operations. The two large trans-Br—Cu—Br angles are very similar [130.66 (3)° for Br2—Cu1—Br3 and 129.58 (3)° for Br1—Cu1—Br4].

The most striking feature of this structure is the segregated packing of symmetrically inequivalent organic cations into layers with very different arrangements. Cation 1 (containing atom N11) packs in a layer along the bc faces of the unit cell, while cation 2 (containing atom N21) packs in a parallel layer midway in the unit cell.

The molecular axis of cation 1 (as defined by the N11—C14 line) is almost perpendicular to the layer plane, forming a small angle of 9.24 (11)° relative to the normal to the layer plane. Cation 1 forms inversion-related pairs in which the parallel cation planes are separated by a distance of 3.56 (2) Å. The cation pairs form an hcp layer where two neighbouring pairs are related by a c-axis translation, while the other four neighbours are related by a c-glide operation. Since the normal to the cation plane forms an angle of 36.43 (7)° with respect to b, the orientation of the planes of the neighbours related by the c-glide is switched. The inversion-related cations in each pair are shifted along their molecular axes relative to one another so that the N atom of each extends into opposite anionic layers. Complex anions from neighbouring layers nest in the voids formed by neighbouring cation pairs.

Cation 2 packs to give a corrugated layer made up of uneven stacks of cations parallel to c. This stacking bears some resemblence to the cation stacking in (I), but with substantial differences. Within a given stack, the molecular axes of the cations all point in the same direction along a, rather than alternating directions as seen in (I). The molecular axes, however, are not parallel to a but tilted at an angle of 13.57 (12)° [and at an angle of 79.89 (11)° with respect to b]. Neighbouring cations within the stack are related by a c-glide operation which switches the orientation of the cation plane relative to b, so neighbouring cations are not coplanar, and it also switches the orientation of the molecular axis relative to a. This results in an unevenness in the stacking and in the staggering of the molecular axes within the stack, so as to increase the distance between the formal seats of positive charge on neighbouring cations. The distance between neighbouring cations [4.1886 (1) Å, as measured by one-half the c-axis length] is larger than that found in (I). Expansion of the unit cell to accomodate the larger bromide complex allows for this looser stacking of the cations. Neighbouring stacks in the layer are related by inversion and are offset from one another along a so that the N atoms of the stack penetrate into the nearest anion layer, thus giving rise to the layer corrugation. Complex anions nest in grooves between stacks. A packing diagram of the structure viewed down c (and down the stacks of cation 2) is presented in Fig. 4.

The 1,3,4-trimethylpyridinium cation is the smallest of the four cations for which the Fdd2 A2CuX4 structure type has been found. The fact that the bromide structure, (II), is not isomorphous with the chloride structure, (I) - unlike the situation for the methyltriphenylarsonium salts - with a significantly different packing of the organic cations, indicates that this ion has a minimal size required to form this structure type. However, the other (1-methyllutidinium)2CuCl4 structures studied so far do not exhibit this structure type (Bond, 2009). Thus, while cation size may be an important consideration in forming this structure type, cation structure must also play an important role.

Experimental top

Both compounds were prepared by slow evaporation of approximately 6 M HCl or HBr solutions of 1,3,4-trimethylpyridinium halide and copper(II) chloride dihydrate or copper(II) bromide, respectively, in a 2:1 stoichimetry. 1,3,4-Trimethylpyridinium halide was prepared by the reaction of 3,4-lutidine with an excess of iodomethane. The mixture was then stirred with an excess of silver halide to convert the iodide to the chloride or bromide salt. The resulting silver halide solid was removed by filtration. Suitable crystals of (I) and (II) were obtained by slow evaporation of the filtrates, giving yellow prism-like crystals of (I) and dark-purple prism-like crystals of (II).

Refinement top

For both compounds, the H atoms were included in calculated positions and treated as riding atoms, with C—H = 0.93–0.96 Å and with Uiso(H) = kUeq(C), where k = 1.2 for aromatic H atoms and 1.5 for methyl H atoms. In compound (II), the C11 and C41 methyl groups were refined with twofold disorder (occupancies 0.5 and 0.5).

Computing details top

For both compounds, data collection: COLLECT (Nonius, 2000); cell refinement: HKL SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor 1997); data reduction: HKL DENZO and SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor 1997); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The organic cation and complex anion of the chloride structure, (I), with the atom-numbering scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level and H atoms are shown as small spheres of arbitrary radii. [Symmetry code: (i) 1/2 - x, 1/2 - y, z].
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. A packing diagram for (I), viewed parallel to the [101] lattice line. The view is down stacks of organic cations in alternate layers that nest between lines of complex anions.
[Figure 3] Fig. 3. The organic cation and complex anion of the bromide structure, (II), with the atom-numbering scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level and H atoms are shown as small spheres of arbitrary radii. [Symmetry code: (i) 1/2 - x, 1/2 - y, z].
[Figure 4] Fig. 4. A packing diagram for (II), viewed parallel to the c axis. The stacks of cation 2 are visible in the middle layer, while the hcp pairs of cation 1 are found in the top and bottom layers of the illustration.
(I) bis(1,3,4-trimethylpyridinium) tetrachloridocuprate(II) top
Crystal data top
(C8H12N)2[CuCl4]Dx = 1.462 Mg m3
Mr = 449.71Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Orthorhombic, Fdd2Cell parameters from 15098 reflections
a = 13.2423 (2) Åθ = 1.0–31.0°
b = 35.3359 (7) ŵ = 1.59 mm1
c = 8.7298 (1) ÅT = 298 K
V = 4084.92 (11) Å3Prism, yellow
Z = 80.30 × 0.20 × 0.10 mm
F(000) = 1848
Data collection top
Nonius KappaCCD area-detector
diffractometer
3101 independent reflections
Radiation source: Enraf Nonius FR5902457 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.080
Detector resolution: 9 pixels mm-1θmax = 31.0°, θmin = 3.3°
CCD rotation images, thick slices scansh = 1918
Absorption correction: gaussian
(grid of 8 x 8 x 8 sampling points; Software?)
k = 5050
Tmin = 0.661, Tmax = 0.874l = 1211
24053 measured reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
Least-squares matrix: fullH-atom parameters constrained
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.034 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0491P)2 + 0.4115P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
wR(F2) = 0.087(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
S = 1.03Δρmax = 0.37 e Å3
3101 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.43 e Å3
107 parametersExtinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
1 restraintExtinction coefficient: 0.00241 (19)
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsAbsolute structure: Flack (1983), with 1374 Friedel pairs
Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier mapAbsolute structure parameter: 0.015 (12)
Crystal data top
(C8H12N)2[CuCl4]V = 4084.92 (11) Å3
Mr = 449.71Z = 8
Orthorhombic, Fdd2Mo Kα radiation
a = 13.2423 (2) ŵ = 1.59 mm1
b = 35.3359 (7) ÅT = 298 K
c = 8.7298 (1) Å0.30 × 0.20 × 0.10 mm
Data collection top
Nonius KappaCCD area-detector
diffractometer
3101 independent reflections
Absorption correction: gaussian
(grid of 8 x 8 x 8 sampling points; Software?)
2457 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.661, Tmax = 0.874Rint = 0.080
24053 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.034H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.087Δρmax = 0.37 e Å3
S = 1.03Δρmin = 0.43 e Å3
3101 reflectionsAbsolute structure: Flack (1983), with 1374 Friedel pairs
107 parametersAbsolute structure parameter: 0.015 (12)
1 restraint
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/UeqOcc. (<1)
Cu10.250.250.29137 (4)0.03924 (12)
Cl10.34789 (5)0.20593 (2)0.40105 (9)0.0688 (2)
Cl20.13061 (5)0.212203 (19)0.19266 (8)0.0625 (2)
N10.10248 (14)0.18327 (5)0.7289 (2)0.0452 (4)
C110.0961 (2)0.22470 (7)0.7506 (4)0.0695 (8)
H11A0.07550.23010.85370.104*0.5
H11B0.04760.2350.68030.104*0.5
H11C0.1610.23590.73180.104*0.5
H11D0.11390.23720.65680.104*0.5
H11E0.14180.23230.83020.104*0.5
H11F0.02840.23150.77880.104*0.5
C20.13007 (17)0.16853 (7)0.5938 (3)0.0451 (5)
H20.1440.18480.51270.054*
C30.13847 (16)0.13020 (7)0.5715 (3)0.0446 (5)
C310.1713 (2)0.11588 (9)0.4184 (4)0.0704 (7)
H31A0.17960.13680.34940.106*
H31B0.12110.09890.37860.106*
H31C0.23440.10270.42870.106*
C40.11654 (16)0.10603 (6)0.6942 (3)0.0482 (5)
C410.1237 (2)0.06404 (8)0.6744 (5)0.0739 (9)
H41A0.14390.05840.57130.111*0.5
H41B0.0590.05280.69450.111*0.5
H41C0.17270.0540.74460.111*0.5
H41D0.10650.05180.7690.111*0.5
H41E0.19140.05730.64580.111*0.5
H41F0.07770.05610.59560.111*0.5
C50.0896 (2)0.12205 (8)0.8312 (3)0.0557 (6)
H50.07590.10650.91450.067*
C60.0822 (2)0.16039 (8)0.8483 (3)0.0558 (6)
H60.06330.17060.94220.067*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cu10.04469 (19)0.03268 (17)0.04034 (19)0.00218 (15)00
Cl10.0600 (4)0.0582 (4)0.0881 (6)0.0038 (3)0.0121 (4)0.0282 (4)
Cl20.0629 (4)0.0542 (4)0.0705 (5)0.0108 (3)0.0146 (3)0.0141 (3)
N10.0491 (10)0.0344 (9)0.0522 (11)0.0004 (7)0.0095 (8)0.0022 (7)
C110.0807 (18)0.0344 (11)0.093 (2)0.0038 (11)0.0161 (16)0.0067 (13)
C20.0482 (11)0.0442 (12)0.0428 (11)0.0016 (9)0.0089 (9)0.0024 (9)
C30.0426 (11)0.0478 (12)0.0435 (13)0.0009 (9)0.0056 (8)0.0060 (9)
C310.088 (2)0.0711 (18)0.0522 (17)0.0011 (15)0.0091 (14)0.0143 (14)
C40.0432 (11)0.0385 (11)0.0629 (14)0.0001 (9)0.0075 (10)0.0058 (11)
C410.0815 (18)0.0387 (13)0.102 (3)0.0015 (12)0.0224 (18)0.0074 (15)
C50.0715 (16)0.0464 (13)0.0491 (15)0.0037 (11)0.0161 (11)0.0092 (10)
C60.0686 (15)0.0536 (14)0.0452 (13)0.0022 (12)0.0149 (11)0.0057 (11)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Cu1—Cl12.2410 (7)C31—H31A0.96
Cu1—Cl22.2419 (6)C31—H31B0.96
N1—C21.340 (3)C31—H31C0.96
N1—C61.346 (3)C4—C51.371 (4)
N1—C111.479 (3)C4—C411.497 (4)
C11—H11A0.96C41—H41A0.96
C11—H11B0.96C41—H41B0.96
C11—H11C0.96C41—H41C0.96
C11—H11D0.96C41—H41D0.96
C11—H11E0.96C41—H41E0.96
C11—H11F0.96C41—H41F0.96
C2—C31.373 (3)C5—C61.367 (4)
C2—H20.93C5—H50.93
C3—C41.401 (3)C6—H60.93
C3—C311.494 (3)
Cl1i—Cu1—Cl1129.41 (5)C3—C31—H31B109.5
Cl1—Cu1—Cl2i99.80 (3)H31A—C31—H31B109.5
Cl1—Cu1—Cl299.10 (3)C3—C31—H31C109.5
Cl2i—Cu1—Cl2134.79 (4)H31A—C31—H31C109.5
C2—N1—C6120.2 (2)H31B—C31—H31C109.5
C2—N1—C11120.9 (2)C5—C4—C3118.0 (2)
C6—N1—C11118.9 (2)C5—C4—C41121.8 (3)
N1—C11—H11A109.5C3—C4—C41120.2 (3)
N1—C11—H11B109.5C4—C41—H41A109.5
H11A—C11—H11B109.5C4—C41—H41B109.5
N1—C11—H11C109.5H41A—C41—H41B109.5
H11A—C11—H11C109.5C4—C41—H41C109.5
H11B—C11—H11C109.5H41A—C41—H41C109.5
N1—C11—H11D109.5H41B—C41—H41C109.5
N1—C11—H11E109.5C4—C41—H41D109.5
H11D—C11—H11E109.5C4—C41—H41E109.5
N1—C11—H11F109.5H41D—C41—H41E109.5
H11D—C11—H11F109.5C4—C41—H41F109.5
H11E—C11—H11F109.5H41D—C41—H41F109.5
N1—C2—C3122.1 (2)H41E—C41—H41F109.5
N1—C2—H2119C6—C5—C4121.6 (2)
C3—C2—H2119C6—C5—H5119.2
C2—C3—C4118.4 (2)C4—C5—H5119.2
C2—C3—C31119.0 (2)N1—C6—C5119.8 (2)
C4—C3—C31122.6 (2)N1—C6—H6120.1
C3—C31—H31A109.5C5—C6—H6120.1
Symmetry code: (i) x+1/2, y+1/2, z.
(II) bis(1,3,4-trimethylpyridinium) tetrabromidocuprate(II) top
Crystal data top
(C8H12N)2[CuBr4]F(000) = 1212
Mr = 627.55Dx = 1.884 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 17.8882 (4) ÅCell parameters from 17042 reflections
b = 14.8736 (3) Åθ = 1.0–27.5°
c = 8.3772 (1) ŵ = 8.21 mm1
β = 96.854 (1)°T = 298 K
V = 2212.93 (7) Å3Prism, dark purple
Z = 40.21 × 0.17 × 0.09 mm
Data collection top
Nonius KappaCCD area-detector
diffractometer
5071 independent reflections
Radiation source: Enraf Nonius FR5903469 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.083
Detector resolution: 9 pixels mm-1θmax = 27.5°, θmin = 3.7°
CCD rotation images, thick slices scansh = 2323
Absorption correction: gaussian
(grid of 8 x 8 x 8 sampling points; Software?)
k = 1919
Tmin = 0.242, Tmax = 0.534l = 1010
37761 measured reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.039H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.090 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0399P)2 + 0.655P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.04(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
5071 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.46 e Å3
215 parametersΔρmin = 0.46 e Å3
0 restraintsExtinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction coefficient: 0.0033 (2)
Crystal data top
(C8H12N)2[CuBr4]V = 2212.93 (7) Å3
Mr = 627.55Z = 4
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation
a = 17.8882 (4) ŵ = 8.21 mm1
b = 14.8736 (3) ÅT = 298 K
c = 8.3772 (1) Å0.21 × 0.17 × 0.09 mm
β = 96.854 (1)°
Data collection top
Nonius KappaCCD area-detector
diffractometer
5071 independent reflections
Absorption correction: gaussian
(grid of 8 x 8 x 8 sampling points; Software?)
3469 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.242, Tmax = 0.534Rint = 0.083
37761 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0390 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.090H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.04Δρmax = 0.46 e Å3
5071 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.46 e Å3
215 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Cu10.25000 (3)0.99261 (3)0.14313 (5)0.04220 (13)
Br10.31668 (3)0.98811 (3)0.40717 (5)0.05812 (14)
Br20.15837 (3)0.87738 (3)0.16072 (6)0.06027 (15)
Br30.35288 (3)1.00011 (4)0.00919 (6)0.06865 (16)
Br40.17302 (3)1.10939 (3)0.01372 (5)0.05383 (14)
N110.10866 (18)0.8925 (2)0.6638 (4)0.0453 (8)
C11A0.1910 (3)0.8908 (4)0.7140 (6)0.0687 (13)
H11A0.21720.90020.62190.103*
H11B0.2050.83360.76150.103*
H11C0.20410.93760.79120.103*
C120.0794 (2)0.8460 (2)0.5333 (4)0.0421 (9)
H120.11170.81410.47490.05*
C130.0043 (2)0.8443 (2)0.4840 (4)0.0394 (8)
C13A0.0230 (3)0.7900 (3)0.3373 (5)0.0627 (12)
H13A0.01950.76880.28790.094*
H13B0.05410.82690.26240.094*
H13C0.05170.73960.36770.094*
C140.0441 (2)0.8917 (2)0.5719 (4)0.0407 (8)
C14A0.1277 (3)0.8900 (3)0.5253 (6)0.0647 (12)
H14A0.13850.89930.41150.097*
H14B0.15070.93680.58130.097*
H14C0.14730.83280.55320.097*
C150.0122 (2)0.9396 (3)0.7053 (5)0.0472 (10)
H150.04310.97280.76510.057*
C160.0628 (3)0.9389 (3)0.7496 (5)0.0516 (10)
H160.0830.97070.84020.062*
N210.38648 (19)0.2118 (2)0.7192 (4)0.0479 (8)
C21A0.3047 (3)0.1953 (3)0.6927 (7)0.0703 (14)
H21A0.27940.24880.65120.105*
H21B0.28710.17920.79270.105*
H21C0.29440.14720.61690.105*
C220.4129 (2)0.2958 (3)0.7470 (5)0.0512 (10)
H220.37880.34280.74880.061*
C230.4879 (2)0.3143 (3)0.7728 (5)0.0471 (9)
C23A0.5129 (3)0.4104 (3)0.8007 (7)0.0749 (15)
H23A0.53460.4320.70850.112*
H23B0.54980.41350.89380.112*
H23C0.47030.44690.81770.112*
C240.5389 (2)0.2443 (3)0.7703 (5)0.0504 (10)
C24A0.6224 (3)0.2608 (4)0.7945 (8)0.0802 (16)
H24A0.63640.29680.70770.12*
H24B0.64850.20440.79690.12*
H24C0.63560.29180.89440.12*
C250.5100 (3)0.1587 (3)0.7404 (6)0.0615 (12)
H250.54290.11050.73660.074*
C260.4351 (3)0.1441 (3)0.7167 (6)0.0583 (12)
H260.4170.08590.69830.07*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cu10.0376 (3)0.0468 (3)0.0423 (3)0.0010 (2)0.00483 (19)0.0025 (2)
Br10.0488 (3)0.0797 (3)0.0444 (2)0.0033 (2)0.00064 (18)0.0036 (2)
Br20.0639 (3)0.0548 (3)0.0635 (3)0.0175 (2)0.0133 (2)0.0027 (2)
Br30.0483 (3)0.1033 (4)0.0573 (3)0.0036 (3)0.0185 (2)0.0070 (3)
Br40.0534 (3)0.0454 (2)0.0607 (3)0.00455 (19)0.0011 (2)0.00366 (19)
N110.0385 (19)0.0535 (19)0.0435 (18)0.0031 (15)0.0036 (14)0.0033 (15)
C11A0.042 (3)0.096 (4)0.067 (3)0.012 (3)0.003 (2)0.000 (3)
C120.048 (2)0.042 (2)0.038 (2)0.0015 (17)0.0135 (17)0.0008 (16)
C130.046 (2)0.0351 (19)0.0371 (19)0.0035 (16)0.0043 (16)0.0000 (15)
C13A0.068 (3)0.066 (3)0.054 (3)0.007 (2)0.004 (2)0.015 (2)
C140.041 (2)0.0371 (19)0.045 (2)0.0020 (16)0.0068 (16)0.0058 (16)
C14A0.048 (3)0.074 (3)0.072 (3)0.004 (2)0.008 (2)0.002 (3)
C150.054 (3)0.041 (2)0.049 (2)0.0022 (18)0.016 (2)0.0058 (18)
C160.065 (3)0.049 (2)0.041 (2)0.015 (2)0.009 (2)0.0078 (18)
N210.044 (2)0.0393 (17)0.060 (2)0.0030 (15)0.0059 (16)0.0016 (15)
C21A0.044 (3)0.058 (3)0.108 (4)0.006 (2)0.004 (3)0.005 (3)
C220.051 (3)0.0323 (19)0.071 (3)0.0050 (18)0.011 (2)0.0008 (18)
C230.045 (2)0.038 (2)0.058 (2)0.0031 (18)0.0086 (19)0.0014 (18)
C23A0.056 (3)0.044 (3)0.126 (5)0.005 (2)0.015 (3)0.009 (3)
C240.044 (2)0.048 (2)0.060 (3)0.0012 (18)0.0061 (19)0.0032 (19)
C24A0.051 (3)0.068 (3)0.120 (5)0.002 (3)0.004 (3)0.010 (3)
C250.049 (3)0.038 (2)0.096 (4)0.009 (2)0.005 (2)0.008 (2)
C260.058 (3)0.0299 (19)0.087 (3)0.0014 (19)0.008 (2)0.004 (2)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Cu1—Br12.3854 (6)C15—H150.93
Cu1—Br22.3881 (6)C16—H160.93
Cu1—Br32.3639 (6)N21—C261.332 (5)
Cu1—Br42.3943 (6)N21—C221.345 (5)
N11—C161.344 (5)N21—C21A1.473 (5)
N11—C121.346 (5)C21A—H21A0.96
N11—C11A1.484 (5)C21A—H21B0.96
C11A—H11A0.96C21A—H21C0.96
C11A—H11B0.96C22—C231.361 (6)
C11A—H11C0.96C22—H220.93
C12—C131.358 (5)C23—C241.386 (6)
C12—H120.93C23—C23A1.507 (6)
C13—C141.392 (5)C23A—H23A0.96
C13—C13A1.503 (5)C23A—H23B0.96
C13A—H13A0.96C23A—H23C0.96
C13A—H13B0.96C24—C251.385 (6)
C13A—H13C0.96C24—C24A1.503 (6)
C14—C151.390 (5)C24A—H24A0.96
C14—C14A1.500 (6)C24A—H24B0.96
C14A—H14A0.96C24A—H24C0.96
C14A—H14B0.96C25—C261.349 (6)
C14A—H14C0.96C25—H250.93
C15—C161.350 (6)C26—H260.93
Br1—Cu1—Br399.58 (2)N11—C16—C15120.5 (4)
Br1—Cu1—Br2101.16 (2)N11—C16—H16119.8
Br1—Cu1—Br4129.58 (3)C15—C16—H16119.8
Br2—Cu1—Br3130.66 (3)C26—N21—C22119.2 (4)
Br2—Cu1—Br4100.76 (2)C26—N21—C21A120.6 (3)
Br3—Cu1—Br499.45 (2)C22—N21—C21A120.2 (3)
C16—N11—C12119.7 (4)N21—C21A—H21A109.5
C16—N11—C11A120.4 (4)N21—C21A—H21B109.5
C12—N11—C11A119.9 (4)H21A—C21A—H21B109.5
N11—C11A—H11A109.5N21—C21A—H21C109.5
N11—C11A—H11B109.5H21A—C21A—H21C109.5
H11A—C11A—H11B109.5H21B—C21A—H21C109.5
N11—C11A—H11C109.5N21—C22—C23122.4 (4)
H11A—C11A—H11C109.5N21—C22—H22118.8
H11B—C11A—H11C109.5C23—C22—H22118.8
N11—C12—C13122.1 (3)C22—C23—C24118.8 (4)
N11—C12—H12119C22—C23—C23A119.0 (4)
C13—C12—H12119C24—C23—C23A122.1 (4)
C12—C13—C14119.0 (3)C23—C23A—H23A109.5
C12—C13—C13A118.1 (4)C23—C23A—H23B109.5
C14—C13—C13A122.9 (4)H23A—C23A—H23B109.5
C13—C13A—H13A109.5C23—C23A—H23C109.5
C13—C13A—H13B109.5H23A—C23A—H23C109.5
H13A—C13A—H13B109.5H23B—C23A—H23C109.5
C13—C13A—H13C109.5C25—C24—C23117.5 (4)
H13A—C13A—H13C109.5C25—C24—C24A121.2 (4)
H13B—C13A—H13C109.5C23—C24—C24A121.3 (4)
C15—C14—C13117.6 (4)C24—C24A—H24A109.5
C15—C14—C14A121.2 (4)C24—C24A—H24B109.5
C13—C14—C14A121.1 (4)H24A—C24A—H24B109.5
C14—C14A—H14A109.5C24—C24A—H24C109.5
C14—C14A—H14B109.5H24A—C24A—H24C109.5
H14A—C14A—H14B109.5H24B—C24A—H24C109.5
C14—C14A—H14C109.5C26—C25—C24121.1 (4)
H14A—C14A—H14C109.5C26—C25—H25119.4
H14B—C14A—H14C109.5C24—C25—H25119.4
C16—C15—C14121.1 (4)N21—C26—C25121.0 (4)
C16—C15—H15119.5N21—C26—H26119.5
C14—C15—H15119.5C25—C26—H26119.5

Experimental details

(I)(II)
Crystal data
Chemical formula(C8H12N)2[CuCl4](C8H12N)2[CuBr4]
Mr449.71627.55
Crystal system, space groupOrthorhombic, Fdd2Monoclinic, P21/c
Temperature (K)298298
a, b, c (Å)13.2423 (2), 35.3359 (7), 8.7298 (1)17.8882 (4), 14.8736 (3), 8.3772 (1)
α, β, γ (°)90, 90, 9090, 96.854 (1), 90
V3)4084.92 (11)2212.93 (7)
Z84
Radiation typeMo KαMo Kα
µ (mm1)1.598.21
Crystal size (mm)0.30 × 0.20 × 0.100.21 × 0.17 × 0.09
Data collection
DiffractometerNonius KappaCCD area-detector
diffractometer
Nonius KappaCCD area-detector
diffractometer
Absorption correctionGaussian
(grid of 8 x 8 x 8 sampling points; Software?)
Gaussian
(grid of 8 x 8 x 8 sampling points; Software?)
Tmin, Tmax0.661, 0.8740.242, 0.534
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
24053, 3101, 2457 37761, 5071, 3469
Rint0.0800.083
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.7240.650
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.034, 0.087, 1.03 0.039, 0.090, 1.04
No. of reflections31015071
No. of parameters107215
No. of restraints10
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrainedH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.37, 0.430.46, 0.46
Absolute structureFlack (1983), with 1374 Friedel pairs?
Absolute structure parameter0.015 (12)?

Computer programs: COLLECT (Nonius, 2000), HKL SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor 1997), HKL DENZO and SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor 1997), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997), WinGX (Farrugia, 1999).

Selected geometric parameters (Å, º) for (I) top
Cu1—Cl12.2410 (7)Cu1—Cl22.2419 (6)
Cl1i—Cu1—Cl1129.41 (5)Cl1—Cu1—Cl299.10 (3)
Cl1—Cu1—Cl2i99.80 (3)Cl2i—Cu1—Cl2134.79 (4)
Symmetry code: (i) x+1/2, y+1/2, z.
Selected geometric parameters (Å, º) for (II) top
Cu1—Br12.3854 (6)Cu1—Br32.3639 (6)
Cu1—Br22.3881 (6)Cu1—Br42.3943 (6)
Br1—Cu1—Br399.58 (2)Br2—Cu1—Br3130.66 (3)
Br1—Cu1—Br2101.16 (2)Br2—Cu1—Br4100.76 (2)
Br1—Cu1—Br4129.58 (3)Br3—Cu1—Br499.45 (2)
 

Follow Acta Cryst. C
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds