Download citation
Download citation
link to html
Full three-dimensional diffuse scattering data have been recorded for both polymorphic forms [(I) and (II)] of aspirin and these data have been analysed using Monte Carlo computer modelling. The observed scattering in form (I) is well reproduced by a simple harmonic model of thermally induced displacements. The data for form (II) show, in addition to thermal diffuse scattering (TDS) similar to that in form (I), diffuse streaks originating from stacking fault-like defects as well as other effects that can be attributed to strain induced by these defects. The present study has provided strong evidence that the aspirin form (II) structure is a true polymorph with a structure quite distinct from that of form (I). The diffuse scattering evidence presented shows that crystals of form (II) are essentially composed of large single domains of the form (II) lattice with a relatively small volume fraction of intrinsic planar defects or faults comprising misoriented bilayers of molecular dimers. There is evidence of some local aggregation of these defect bilayers to form small included regions of the form (I) structure. Evidence is also presented that shows that the strain effects arise from the mismatch of molecular packing between the defect region and the surrounding form (II) lattice. This occurs at the edges of the planar defects in the b direction only.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108768110037055/so5043sup1.cif
Contains datablocks aspirin-form2, publication_text

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108768110037055/so5043aspirin-form2sup2.hkl
Contains datablock aspirin-form2

CCDC references: 810889; 1101022

Computing details top

Cell refinement: HKL SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor 1997); data reduction: HKL DENZO and SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor 1997); program(s) used to solve structure: known; program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: Xtal3.7 (Hall et al., 2001); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX publication routines (Farrugia, 1999).

(aspirin-form2) top
Crystal data top
C9H8O4F(000) = 376
Mr = 180.15Dx = 1.394 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 8462 reflections
a = 12.2696 (5) Åθ = 27.5–2.6°
b = 6.5575 (3) ŵ = 0.11 mm1
c = 11.4960 (4) ÅT = 300 K
β = 68.163 (2)°Prism, colourless
V = 858.58 (6) Å30.4 × 0.2 × 0.1 mm
Z = 4
Data collection top
KappaCCD
diffractometer
1853 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1425 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.031
Detector resolution: 9 pixels mm-1θmax = 27.2°, θmin = 3.6°
CCD scansh = 1515
Absorption correction: integration
Gaussian integration (Coppens, 1970)
k = 58
Tmin = 0.968, Tmax = 0.986l = 1414
6924 measured reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.043Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.129H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.09 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.065P)2 + 0.127P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1853 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
119 parametersΔρmax = 0.23 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.20 e Å3
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.15361 (12)0.5634 (2)0.00763 (12)0.0422 (4)
C20.24609 (13)0.4867 (2)0.11120 (12)0.0445 (4)
C30.29856 (14)0.3035 (3)0.10485 (15)0.0541 (4)
H140.35910.25350.17510.065*
C40.26148 (15)0.1939 (3)0.00552 (16)0.0584 (4)
H150.29760.07090.00950.070*
C50.17144 (16)0.2657 (3)0.10958 (16)0.0552 (4)
H160.14680.19200.18400.066*
C60.11776 (14)0.4480 (2)0.10276 (13)0.0487 (4)
H170.05640.49530.17320.058*
C70.09012 (13)0.7565 (2)0.00660 (13)0.0432 (4)
O80.00975 (10)0.81103 (19)0.09154 (10)0.0604 (4)
O90.12013 (10)0.85938 (19)0.10910 (10)0.0580 (3)
H180.07960.96240.09750.087*
O100.28510 (9)0.58717 (18)0.22724 (8)0.0494 (3)
C110.36529 (13)0.7386 (3)0.24386 (13)0.0484 (4)
O120.40430 (11)0.7814 (2)0.16633 (10)0.0627 (4)
C130.39556 (17)0.8367 (4)0.36860 (16)0.0710 (6)
H190.45270.94200.37830.107*
H200.32620.89520.37470.107*
H210.42740.73640.43320.107*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.0385 (7)0.0489 (8)0.0387 (7)0.0031 (6)0.0139 (6)0.0013 (6)
C20.0417 (8)0.0524 (9)0.0382 (7)0.0042 (6)0.0135 (6)0.0022 (6)
C30.0480 (9)0.0567 (10)0.0522 (9)0.0053 (7)0.0125 (7)0.0090 (7)
C40.0576 (10)0.0511 (10)0.0664 (10)0.0056 (8)0.0229 (8)0.0009 (8)
C50.0554 (10)0.0561 (10)0.0522 (9)0.0040 (8)0.0176 (7)0.0105 (7)
C60.0456 (8)0.0551 (10)0.0420 (8)0.0014 (7)0.0124 (6)0.0026 (7)
C70.0400 (8)0.0524 (9)0.0354 (7)0.0028 (6)0.0117 (6)0.0005 (6)
O80.0624 (7)0.0663 (8)0.0415 (6)0.0164 (6)0.0067 (5)0.0004 (5)
O90.0574 (7)0.0617 (7)0.0461 (6)0.0101 (6)0.0091 (5)0.0100 (5)
O100.0477 (6)0.0635 (7)0.0343 (5)0.0028 (5)0.0122 (4)0.0018 (4)
C110.0409 (8)0.0624 (10)0.0370 (7)0.0025 (7)0.0088 (6)0.0003 (7)
O120.0619 (8)0.0819 (9)0.0463 (6)0.0176 (6)0.0226 (6)0.0077 (6)
C130.0651 (11)0.0989 (15)0.0470 (9)0.0108 (11)0.0186 (8)0.0211 (9)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
C1—C21.3974 (19)C6—H170.9300
C1—C61.400 (2)C7—O81.2432 (17)
C1—C71.485 (2)C7—O91.2869 (17)
C2—C31.378 (2)O9—H180.8200
C2—O101.4027 (17)O10—C111.361 (2)
C3—C41.380 (2)C11—O121.1915 (19)
C3—H140.9300C11—C131.487 (2)
C4—C51.375 (2)C13—H190.9600
C4—H150.9300C13—H200.9600
C5—C61.381 (2)C13—H210.9600
C5—H160.9300
C2—C1—C6117.37 (14)C5—C6—H17119.2
C2—C1—C7124.81 (13)C1—C6—H17119.2
C6—C1—C7117.82 (12)O8—C7—O9122.72 (14)
C3—C2—C1121.05 (14)O8—C7—C1119.28 (13)
C3—C2—O10117.33 (13)O9—C7—C1117.99 (12)
C1—C2—O10121.54 (14)C7—O9—H18109.5
C2—C3—C4120.13 (14)C11—O10—C2116.72 (11)
C2—C3—H14119.9O12—C11—O10122.52 (14)
C4—C3—H14119.9O12—C11—C13126.41 (16)
C5—C4—C3120.37 (16)O10—C11—C13111.07 (14)
C5—C4—H15119.8C11—C13—H19109.5
C3—C4—H15119.8C11—C13—H20109.5
C4—C5—C6119.51 (15)H19—C13—H20109.5
C4—C5—H16120.2C11—C13—H21109.5
C6—C5—H16120.2H19—C13—H21109.5
C5—C6—C1121.55 (14)H20—C13—H21109.5
 

Follow Acta Cryst. B
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds