Download citation
Download citation
link to html
The structure of glycyl-DL-leucine, C8H16N2O3, has been determined at 120 K by single-crystal X-ray diffraction. In addition to three N-H...O-type hydrogen bonds of the positively charged RNH3+ group of the zwitterionic mol­ecule, an intermolecular N-H...O contact exists between the peptide bond and the carboxyl­ate group. Four hydrogen-bond cycles were identified, giving a complex pattern.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270100011616/sk1407sup1.cif
Contains datablocks I, glycyl-dl-leucine

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270100011616/sk1407Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

CCDC reference: 156154

Comment top

Study of small peptides has gained interest in the investigation of the geometry of the peptide bond. Structures of over 120 dipeptides can be found in the Cambridge Structural Database (Allen & Kennard, 1993) today. In most cases the naturally occurring l-form, less often the racemic dl-form and simple derivatives of dipeptides, were investigated. In the course of our ongoing research of comparative charge-density studies of different oligopeptides, we have examined several dipeptides. The structure of the racemic dipeptide glycyl-dl-leucine, (I), was not known until now, but the structure of the resolved l-form was investigated by Pattabhi et al. (1974). \sch

Crystals of the title compound were obtained by vapor diffusion of methanol into a saturated aqueous solution of glycyl-dl-leucine. An ORTEP (Burnett & Johnson, 1996) representation of the molecular structure and the atomic numbering scheme is shown in Fig. 1.

Although the two C—O bonds of the carboxylate group are chemically equivalent, they are of different lengths [1.2468 (10) and 1.2773 (10) Å] (Table 1). The oxygen atom of the shorter bond is an acceptor of two N—H···O hydrogen bonds and of two weak C—H···O bonds, while the oxygen of the longer C—O bond has stronger intractions, namely three N—H···O hydrogen bonds (Table 2). When fitting the l-enantiomer of the dl-structure to the resolved glycyl-l-leucine, one finds the positions of the short and long C—O bonds [1.240 (5) and 1.263 (5) Å] exchanged. This is not surprising, because the hydrogen-bonding scheme of the dl-structure is very different from that of the resolved structure. In the latter, both O atoms of the carboxylate group are acceptors of two N—H···O bonds, and the O-atom of the longer C—O bond forms the stronger hydrogen bonds.

A comparison between the torsion angles of the title compound and the corresponding angles of the l-enantiomer (see Table 3) shows, that the conformations are basically the same. The placement of the terminal N1 atom differs the most in the two crystals. The differences in the torsion angles are 18.2° for N1–C1–C2–N2 and 17.3° for N1–C1–C2–O1. Two of the three torsion angles describing the backbone conformation are only slightly different from each other; the third one, C2–N2–C3–C4, is −170.49 (7)° in the dl-form and 172.5° in the l-form. However, as already mentioned in the case of the the l-enantiomer, the angle ω of the peptide bond (ω1: C1–C2–N2–C3) shows a slight deviation [167.07 (7)°] from planarity. The calculated molecular isometricity index comparing the l-conformer of the racemic crystal and the l-enantiomer from the resolved crystal is 94.4% (Kálmán et al., 1993).

Hydrophobic and hydrophilic layers alternate in the crystal of glycyl-dl-leucine as shown in a SCHAKAL representation (Fig. 2). The zwitterionic functional groups are at x = 1/4 and 3/4, while the aliphatic hydrophobic regions are at x = 1/2 and 1. These layers are parallel to the bc crystallographic plane and their thickness is a/4. Within each hydrophilic layer the molecules are connected by a complex system of hydrogen bonds. Hydrogen bonds are listed in Table 2.

The three hydrogen atoms of the N1 amino group take part in four intermolecular interactions to three neighbouring molecules [N1–H1A···O3i (3/2 − x, 3/2 − y, 2 − z), N1–H1B···O3ii (3/2 − x, 1/2 + y, 3/2 − z), N1–H1C···O2iii (x, 1 + y, z), N1–H1C···O3iii (x, 1 + y, z)]. O2 is an acceptor of hydrogen bonds from two neighbouring molecules [O2···H2—N2v (x, 1 − y, −1/2 + z), O2···H1D—C1v (x, 1 − y, −1/2 + z) and O2···H1C—N1vi (x, −1 + y, z)] while O3 from three different neighbours O3···H1A–N1i (3/2 − x, 3/2 − y, 2 − z), [O3···H1C—N1vi (x, −1 + y, z) and O3···H1B—N1vii (3/2 − x, −1/2 + y, 3/2 − z)]. The N2 atom in the peptide bond participates in an intermolecular interaction with the carboxyl oxygen O2 [N2—H2···O2iv (x, 1 − y, 1/2 + z)]. There are two intramolecular hydrogen bonds stabilizing the molecular conformation. These are O1···H1B–N1 and O2···H7–C7.

In the crystal lattice, four loops are formed with the participation of hydrogen bonds (Fig. 3). The largest one is a homodromic cycle of four molecules, the hydrogen-bond network graph-set notation is R44(26) (Grell et al., 1999). Two cycles include three molecules, R32(12) and R33(11), respectively. One loop consists of two molecules, R22(16), being built up from a D– and an l-form connected through an inversion center (molecules 0 and i on Figure 2).

Refinement top

All non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically. All hydrogen atoms were found in difference Fourier maps. Five types of hydrogen atoms were refined with a free variable of the displacement parameters.

Computing details top

Data collection: SMART (Siemens, 1996); cell refinement: SMART; data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: ORTEPIII (Burnett & Johnson, 1996), PLATON (Spek, 1990), SCHAKAL (Keller, 1997).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The molecular structure and numbering scheme of (I). Displacement ellipsoids are plotted at 50% probability (ORTEPIII; Burnett & Johnson, 1996 and PLATON; Spek, 1990). The directions of intra- and intermolecular hydrogen bonds are presented by dashed lines.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. Packing of the unit cell of (I) drawn with SCHAKAL97 (Keller, 1997). Hydrophilic parts of the cell are drawn in black, while hydrophobic regions are gray.
[Figure 3] Fig. 3. Diagram showing the cycles formed by N–H···O type strong hydrogen bonding. Symmetry operations, chirality and the sequence number from Table 2 are inscribed into the rectangles representing the molecules [symmetry code: (viii) 3/2 − x, 3/2 − y, 1 − z].
dl-2-(2-amino-acetylamino)-4-metyhl-pentanoic acid top
Crystal data top
C8H16N2O3F(000) = 816
Mr = 188.23Dx = 1.242 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 29.038 (6) ÅCell parameters from 9661 reflections
b = 7.233 (1) Åθ = 1.4–30.8°
c = 9.629 (2) ŵ = 0.10 mm1
β = 95.45 (3)°T = 120 K
V = 2013.3 (7) Å3Column, colourless
Z = 80.82 × 0.32 × 0.30 mm
Data collection top
Bruker AXS SMART CCD
diffractometer
3108 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube2782 reflections with I > 2 σ (I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.024
ω and ϕ scansθmax = 30.8°, θmin = 1.4°
Absorption correction: empirical (using intensity measurements)
SADABS (Blessing, 1995; Sheldrick, 1996)
h = 4041
Tmin = 0.926, Tmax = 0.972k = 1010
13963 measured reflectionsl = 1313
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.041H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.115 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0697P)2 + 0.7749P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.07(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
3108 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.47 e Å3
172 parametersΔρmin = 0.26 e Å3
0 restraintsExtinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction coefficient: 0.0043 (8)
Crystal data top
C8H16N2O3V = 2013.3 (7) Å3
Mr = 188.23Z = 8
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation
a = 29.038 (6) ŵ = 0.10 mm1
b = 7.233 (1) ÅT = 120 K
c = 9.629 (2) Å0.82 × 0.32 × 0.30 mm
β = 95.45 (3)°
Data collection top
Bruker AXS SMART CCD
diffractometer
3108 independent reflections
Absorption correction: empirical (using intensity measurements)
SADABS (Blessing, 1995; Sheldrick, 1996)
2782 reflections with I > 2 σ (I)
Tmin = 0.926, Tmax = 0.972Rint = 0.024
13963 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0410 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.115H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.07Δρmax = 0.47 e Å3
3108 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.26 e Å3
172 parameters
Special details top

Experimental. A Bruker AXS low temperature device was used. The crystal - detector distance was 4 cm and each frame covered 0.4° in ω or ϕ. A 0.8 mm collimator was used due to the comparably large crystal size. The reciprocal space was explored by a combination of four different runs with 2θ = 30°, adding a ϕ-scan to the standard settings giving a coverage of 100% up to d = 0.75 Å. No intensity decay was observed.

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O10.81131 (2)0.78160 (9)0.75669 (6)0.01954 (15)
O20.83434 (2)0.29341 (9)0.73969 (6)0.02348 (16)
O30.78940 (2)0.40562 (8)0.89423 (6)0.01934 (15)
N10.75988 (2)1.03912 (10)0.87725 (7)0.01717 (15)
H1A0.7345 (5)1.042 (2)0.9217 (16)0.033 (2)*
H1B0.7537 (5)0.985 (2)0.7965 (16)0.033 (2)*
H1C0.7670 (5)1.152 (2)0.8596 (14)0.033 (2)*
N20.85126 (2)0.69033 (10)0.95998 (7)0.01762 (15)
H20.8522 (4)0.6970 (18)1.0480 (14)0.023 (3)*
C10.79826 (3)0.94821 (12)0.96517 (9)0.02118 (18)
H1D0.7862 (5)0.893 (2)1.0459 (15)0.0331 (18)*
H1E0.8208 (5)1.038 (2)0.9994 (15)0.0331 (18)*
C20.82104 (3)0.79867 (10)0.88302 (8)0.01597 (16)
C30.86819 (3)0.51863 (11)0.90167 (8)0.01707 (16)
H30.8885 (5)0.546 (2)0.8296 (14)0.028 (2)*
C40.89521 (3)0.40951 (13)1.02003 (9)0.02230 (18)
H4A0.9189 (5)0.495 (2)1.0641 (15)0.0331 (18)*
H4B0.8728 (5)0.379 (2)1.0903 (15)0.0331 (18)*
C50.82755 (3)0.39834 (11)0.83844 (8)0.01661 (16)
C60.95832 (5)0.2663 (2)0.88833 (16)0.0465 (3)
H6A0.9823 (7)0.335 (3)0.941 (2)0.062 (2)*
H6B0.9492 (7)0.342 (3)0.805 (2)0.062 (2)*
H6C0.9734 (7)0.152 (3)0.863 (2)0.062 (2)*
C70.91846 (4)0.22970 (15)0.97724 (11)0.0293 (2)
H70.8945 (5)0.158 (2)0.9193 (14)0.028 (2)*
C80.93426 (6)0.1156 (2)1.10710 (16)0.0504 (4)
H8A0.9062 (7)0.085 (3)1.164 (2)0.062 (2)*
H8B0.9575 (7)0.192 (3)1.152 (2)0.062 (2)*
H8C0.9496 (7)0.004 (3)1.079 (2)0.062 (2)*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0244 (3)0.0189 (3)0.0152 (3)0.0012 (2)0.0010 (2)0.00066 (19)
O20.0318 (4)0.0214 (3)0.0176 (3)0.0009 (2)0.0040 (2)0.0043 (2)
O30.0198 (3)0.0186 (3)0.0199 (3)0.0005 (2)0.0033 (2)0.0007 (2)
N10.0203 (3)0.0136 (3)0.0174 (3)0.0013 (2)0.0011 (2)0.0002 (2)
N20.0208 (3)0.0169 (3)0.0149 (3)0.0022 (2)0.0002 (2)0.0018 (2)
C10.0276 (4)0.0191 (4)0.0164 (3)0.0073 (3)0.0005 (3)0.0010 (3)
C20.0178 (3)0.0134 (3)0.0169 (3)0.0012 (2)0.0024 (3)0.0004 (2)
C30.0174 (3)0.0180 (3)0.0160 (3)0.0019 (3)0.0023 (3)0.0014 (3)
C40.0222 (4)0.0252 (4)0.0189 (4)0.0070 (3)0.0012 (3)0.0007 (3)
C50.0204 (4)0.0146 (3)0.0145 (3)0.0010 (3)0.0000 (3)0.0017 (2)
C60.0356 (6)0.0548 (8)0.0509 (7)0.0189 (6)0.0140 (5)0.0048 (6)
C70.0275 (5)0.0294 (5)0.0301 (5)0.0132 (4)0.0018 (3)0.0021 (4)
C80.0550 (8)0.0469 (7)0.0477 (7)0.0283 (6)0.0037 (6)0.0102 (6)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
O1—C21.2286 (10)C3—C51.5442 (12)
O2—C51.2468 (10)C3—H30.973 (14)
O3—C51.2773 (10)C4—C71.5395 (13)
N1—C11.4872 (11)C4—H4A0.990 (15)
N1—H1A0.888 (15)C4—H4B1.007 (14)
N1—H1B0.875 (16)C6—C71.5266 (18)
N1—H1C0.864 (17)C6—H6A0.96 (2)
N2—C21.3452 (11)C6—H6B0.99 (2)
N2—C31.4670 (11)C6—H6C0.98 (2)
N2—H20.847 (14)C7—C81.5317 (17)
C1—C21.5274 (12)C7—H70.995 (14)
C1—H1D0.970 (14)C8—H8A1.05 (2)
C1—H1E0.961 (15)C8—H8B0.94 (2)
C3—C41.5387 (12)C8—H8C1.02 (2)
C1—N1—H1A110.4 (10)C7—C4—H4A109.8 (9)
C1—N1—H1B112.7 (10)C3—C4—H4B107.2 (8)
H1A—N1—H1B109.3 (14)C7—C4—H4B108.6 (9)
C1—N1—H1C110.6 (9)H4A—C4—H4B108.5 (12)
H1A—N1—H1C107.1 (13)O2—C5—O3123.52 (8)
H1B—N1—H1C106.6 (13)O2—C5—C3118.25 (7)
C2—N2—C3120.48 (7)O3—C5—C3118.15 (7)
C2—N2—H2118.4 (9)C7—C6—H6A109.9 (12)
C3—N2—H2116.8 (9)C7—C6—H6B113.2 (11)
N1—C1—C2110.88 (7)H6A—C6—H6B105.8 (18)
N1—C1—H1D109.4 (9)C7—C6—H6C112.0 (12)
C2—C1—H1D109.2 (9)H6A—C6—H6C104.7 (17)
N1—C1—H1E110.2 (9)H6B—C6—H6C110.7 (17)
C2—C1—H1E110.1 (9)C6—C7—C8111.53 (10)
H1D—C1—H1E107.0 (12)C6—C7—C4112.25 (10)
O1—C2—N2124.30 (8)C8—C7—C4109.98 (9)
O1—C2—C1120.91 (7)C6—C7—H7107.7 (8)
N2—C2—C1114.79 (7)C8—C7—H7108.5 (8)
N2—C3—C4108.47 (7)C4—C7—H7106.7 (8)
N2—C3—C5110.88 (7)C7—C8—H8A110.6 (11)
C4—C3—C5108.65 (7)C7—C8—H8B101.5 (13)
N2—C3—H3110.4 (8)H8A—C8—H8B116.3 (17)
C4—C3—H3109.3 (8)C7—C8—H8C110.1 (11)
C5—C3—H3109.1 (8)H8A—C8—H8C110.0 (16)
C3—C4—C7116.16 (7)H8B—C8—H8C108.0 (16)
C3—C4—H4A106.4 (9)
N1—C1—C2—N2170.25 (7)N2—C3—C5—O331.8 (1)
N1—C1—C2—O19.0 (1)N2—C3—C5—O2151.25 (7)
C1—C2—N2—C3167.07 (7)N2—C3—C4—C7176.25 (8)
C2—N2—C3—C4170.49 (7)C3—C4—C7—C668.0 (1)
C2—N2—C3—C551.3 (1)C3—C4—C7—C8167.2 (1)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1A···O3i0.89 (2)2.00 (2)2.765 (1)143.7 (1)
N1—H1B···O10.87 (2)2.29 (2)2.716 (1)110.2 (1)
N1—H1B···O3ii0.87 (2)2.20 (2)3.017 (1)155.9 (1)
N1—H1C···O2iii0.86 (1)2.58 (1)3.218 (1)132.1 (1)
N1—H1C···O3iii0.86 (1)1.96 (1)2.786 (1)158.7 (1)
N2—H2···O2iv0.85 (1)1.97 (1)2.786 (1)162.9 (1)
C1—H1D···O2iv0.97 (1)2.60 (1)3.258 (1)125.4 (1)
C7—H7···O21.00 (1)2.54 (1)3.217 (1)125.5 (1)
Symmetry codes: (i) x+3/2, y+3/2, z+2; (ii) x+3/2, y+1/2, z+3/2; (iii) x, y+1, z; (iv) x, y+1, z+1/2.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC8H16N2O3
Mr188.23
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, C2/c
Temperature (K)120
a, b, c (Å)29.038 (6), 7.233 (1), 9.629 (2)
β (°) 95.45 (3)
V3)2013.3 (7)
Z8
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)0.10
Crystal size (mm)0.82 × 0.32 × 0.30
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker AXS SMART CCD
diffractometer
Absorption correctionEmpirical (using intensity measurements)
SADABS (Blessing, 1995; Sheldrick, 1996)
Tmin, Tmax0.926, 0.972
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2 σ (I)] reflections
13963, 3108, 2782
Rint0.024
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.721
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.041, 0.115, 1.07
No. of reflections3108
No. of parameters172
H-atom treatmentH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.47, 0.26

Computer programs: SMART (Siemens, 1996), SMART, SAINT, SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), ORTEPIII (Burnett & Johnson, 1996), PLATON (Spek, 1990), SCHAKAL (Keller, 1997).

Selected geometric parameters (Å, º) top
O1—C21.2286 (10)C1—C21.5274 (12)
O2—C51.2468 (10)C3—C41.5387 (12)
O3—C51.2773 (10)C3—C51.5442 (12)
N1—C11.4872 (11)C4—C71.5395 (13)
N2—C21.3452 (11)C6—C71.5266 (18)
N2—C31.4670 (11)C7—C81.5317 (17)
N1—C1—C2110.88 (7)C3—C4—C7116.16 (7)
O1—C2—N2124.30 (8)O2—C5—O3123.52 (8)
O1—C2—C1120.91 (7)O3—C5—C3118.15 (7)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1A···O3i0.89 (2)2.00 (2)2.765 (1)143.7 (1)
N1—H1B···O10.87 (2)2.29 (2)2.716 (1)110.2 (1)
N1—H1B···O3ii0.87 (2)2.20 (2)3.017 (1)155.9 (1)
N1—H1C···O2iii0.86 (1)2.58 (1)3.218 (1)132.1 (1)
N1—H1C···O3iii0.86 (1)1.96 (1)2.786 (1)158.7 (1)
N2—H2···O2iv0.85 (1)1.97 (1)2.786 (1)162.9 (1)
C1—H1D···O2iv0.97 (1)2.60 (1)3.258 (1)125.4 (1)
C7—H7···O21.00 (1)2.54 (1)3.217 (1)125.5 (1)
Symmetry codes: (i) x+3/2, y+3/2, z+2; (ii) x+3/2, y+1/2, z+3/2; (iii) x, y+1, z; (iv) x, y+1, z+1/2.
Comparison of torsional angles of the dl- and l-form top
N1-C1-C2-N2-170.25 (7)171.6ψ1
N1-C1-C2-O19.0 (1)-8.2ψ2
C1-C2-N2-C3167.07 (7)168.7ω1
C2-N2-C3-C4-170.49 (7)172.5ϕ1
C2-N2-C3-C5-51.3 (1)-64.9ϕ2
N2-C3-C5-O3-31.8 (1)-30.2ψ2'
N2-C3-C5-O2151.25 (7)151.9ψ2"
N2-C3-C4-C7-176.25 (8)-175.8χ1
C3-C4-C7-C668.0 (1)62.9χ2'
C3-C4-C7-C8-167.2 (1)-173.0χ2"
 

Follow Acta Cryst. C
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds