Download citation
Download citation
link to html
A monoclinic polymorph of hypoxanthine (systematic name: 1,7-dihydro-6H-purin-6-one), C5H4N4O, is reported. The hydrogen-bonding motifs involve a layered structure of N—H...O and N—H...N hydrogen-bonded mol­ecules. The mean stacking distance between adjacent layers is 3.672 Å.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807030164/sg2177sup1.cif
Contains datablocks I, global

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807030164/sg2177Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

CCDC reference: 655031

Key indicators

  • Single-crystal X-ray study
  • T = 292 K
  • Mean [sigma](C-C) = 0.002 Å
  • R factor = 0.036
  • wR factor = 0.109
  • Data-to-parameter ratio = 12.1

checkCIF/PLATON results

No syntax errors found



Alert level C PLAT125_ALERT_4_C No _symmetry_space_group_name_Hall Given ....... ? PLAT250_ALERT_2_C Large U3/U1 Ratio for Average U(i,j) Tensor .... 2.57
0 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem 0 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem 2 ALERT level C = Check and explain 0 ALERT level G = General alerts; check 0 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 1 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 0 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 1 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion 0 ALERT type 5 Informative message, check

Comment top

A triclinic polymorph of hypoxanthine (I) has been reported (Schmalle et al., 1988). Here we describe a monoclinic polymorph (Figure1). There are two hydrogen bonds of the type N1—H1···O1i with N1—O1i donor-acceptor distance of 2.7846 (18) Å and N4—H4···N3ii with N4—N3ii donor-acceptor distance of 2.8208 (19) Å (Figure 2). In addition, there are different weak intermolecular contacts (Taylor & Kennard,1982) of the form C2—H2···N2iii with C2—N2iii distance of 3.376 (2) Å and C5—H5···O1ii with C5—O1ii distance of 3.1933 (19) Å (Table 1). Thus, the hypoxanthine molecules form sheets approximately parallel to the (102) plane. The separations between parallel hypoxanthine molecules stacked along the a axis is 3.672 Å (Figure 3).

Related literature top

The triclinic polymorph of hypoxanthine was described by Schmalle et al. (1988). There are different weak intermolecular contacts of the form C2—H2···N2iii and C5—H5···O1ii (Taylor & Kennard, 1982).

Experimental top

Hydrothermal treatment of Ba(ClO4)2.6H2O(0.1332 g, 0.3 mmol), Inosine(0.1610 g, 0.6 mmol), And 95% ethanol solution(4 ml) over three days at 70 oC yielded colorless plate crystals of hypoxanthine(I). The product was isolated, washed three times with 70% ethanol solution, and dried in a vacuum desiccator using CaCl2. Yield: 15%. CH&N analysis: Calculated for C5H4N4O: C 44.12, H 2.96, N 41.16%; found: C 44.05, H 2.93, N 41.04%.

Refinement top

H atoms bonded to C or N atoms were placed in calculated positions, with C—H = 0.95 Å and N—H= 0.88 Å, and were included in the refinement in the riding-model approximation, and Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C or N).

Structure description top

A triclinic polymorph of hypoxanthine (I) has been reported (Schmalle et al., 1988). Here we describe a monoclinic polymorph (Figure1). There are two hydrogen bonds of the type N1—H1···O1i with N1—O1i donor-acceptor distance of 2.7846 (18) Å and N4—H4···N3ii with N4—N3ii donor-acceptor distance of 2.8208 (19) Å (Figure 2). In addition, there are different weak intermolecular contacts (Taylor & Kennard,1982) of the form C2—H2···N2iii with C2—N2iii distance of 3.376 (2) Å and C5—H5···O1ii with C5—O1ii distance of 3.1933 (19) Å (Table 1). Thus, the hypoxanthine molecules form sheets approximately parallel to the (102) plane. The separations between parallel hypoxanthine molecules stacked along the a axis is 3.672 Å (Figure 3).

The triclinic polymorph of hypoxanthine was described by Schmalle et al. (1988). There are different weak intermolecular contacts of the form C2—H2···N2iii and C5—H5···O1ii (Taylor & Kennard, 1982).

Computing details top

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2004); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2004); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Bruker, 2004); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL.

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The asymmetric unit of compound (I), with displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 30% probability level.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. The hydrogen-bonding motif in (I). Dashed lines indicate the hydrogen bonds.
[Figure 3] Fig. 3. The packing of (I) in the crystal.
1,7-dihydro-6H-purin-6-one top
Crystal data top
C5H4N4OZ = 4
Mr = 136.12F(000) = 280
Monoclinic, P21/cDx = 1.595 Mg m3
a = 3.6725 (19) ÅMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
b = 17.960 (9) ŵ = 0.12 mm1
c = 9.010 (5) ÅT = 292 K
β = 107.469 (19)°Plate, colorless
V = 566.9 (5) Å30.48 × 0.13 × 0.11 mm
Data collection top
Bruker SMART APEXII CCD area-detector
diffractometer
1113 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube964 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.016
φ and ω scansθmax = 26.0°, θmin = 2.3°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)
h = 44
Tmin = 0.979, Tmax = 0.988k = 2221
2981 measured reflectionsl = 611
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.036H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.109 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0758P)2 + 0.069P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.04(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
1113 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.19 e Å3
92 parametersΔρmin = 0.19 e Å3
0 restraintsExtinction correction: SHELXL97, Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction coefficient: 0.067 (11)
Crystal data top
C5H4N4OV = 566.9 (5) Å3
Mr = 136.12Z = 4
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation
a = 3.6725 (19) ŵ = 0.12 mm1
b = 17.960 (9) ÅT = 292 K
c = 9.010 (5) Å0.48 × 0.13 × 0.11 mm
β = 107.469 (19)°
Data collection top
Bruker SMART APEXII CCD area-detector
diffractometer
1113 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)
964 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.979, Tmax = 0.988Rint = 0.016
2981 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0360 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.109H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.04Δρmax = 0.19 e Å3
1113 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.19 e Å3
92 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O10.5544 (3)0.40375 (5)0.51583 (12)0.0469 (3)
N10.1515 (3)0.46886 (6)0.31417 (13)0.0374 (3)
H10.22130.51070.36580.045*
N20.2451 (3)0.41739 (6)0.08071 (13)0.0388 (3)
N30.2692 (3)0.26683 (6)0.31153 (13)0.0367 (3)
N40.1664 (3)0.28307 (6)0.08049 (13)0.0377 (3)
H40.32750.27210.01090.045*
C10.3174 (4)0.40330 (7)0.38534 (16)0.0339 (3)
C20.1094 (4)0.47339 (8)0.17154 (16)0.0395 (4)
H20.20060.52160.13500.047*
C30.0906 (4)0.35170 (7)0.14506 (15)0.0329 (3)
C40.1784 (3)0.34128 (7)0.28815 (14)0.0317 (3)
C50.0550 (4)0.23473 (8)0.18446 (16)0.0394 (4)
H50.05520.18260.16700.047*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0569 (7)0.0343 (6)0.0312 (6)0.0004 (4)0.0145 (5)0.0024 (4)
N10.0449 (7)0.0273 (6)0.0308 (7)0.0004 (4)0.0026 (5)0.0000 (4)
N20.0406 (6)0.0380 (7)0.0284 (6)0.0014 (5)0.0038 (5)0.0046 (5)
N30.0422 (6)0.0294 (6)0.0289 (6)0.0001 (4)0.0039 (5)0.0000 (4)
N40.0407 (6)0.0380 (7)0.0233 (6)0.0042 (4)0.0075 (5)0.0041 (4)
C10.0358 (6)0.0322 (7)0.0261 (7)0.0012 (5)0.0023 (5)0.0016 (5)
C20.0429 (7)0.0355 (7)0.0318 (8)0.0036 (5)0.0013 (6)0.0062 (5)
C30.0340 (6)0.0348 (7)0.0244 (7)0.0014 (5)0.0004 (5)0.0012 (5)
C40.0338 (7)0.0299 (7)0.0247 (7)0.0005 (5)0.0014 (5)0.0018 (5)
C50.0446 (8)0.0320 (7)0.0317 (8)0.0016 (5)0.0035 (6)0.0029 (5)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
O1—C11.2352 (17)N4—C51.3546 (17)
N1—C21.3553 (18)N4—C31.3557 (17)
N1—C11.3908 (17)N4—H40.8800
N1—H10.8800C1—C41.4141 (18)
N2—C21.2980 (18)C2—H20.9500
N2—C31.3612 (17)C3—C41.3815 (19)
N3—C51.3118 (17)C5—H50.9500
N3—C41.3788 (18)
C2—N1—C1125.10 (11)N2—C2—H2117.3
C2—N1—H1117.4N1—C2—H2117.3
C1—N1—H1117.4N4—C3—N2126.84 (12)
C2—N2—C3111.78 (12)N4—C3—C4105.93 (11)
C5—N3—C4103.81 (11)N2—C3—C4127.22 (12)
C5—N4—C3106.41 (11)N3—C4—C3110.26 (11)
C5—N4—H4126.8N3—C4—C1130.06 (12)
C3—N4—H4126.8C3—C4—C1119.69 (12)
O1—C1—N1121.29 (11)N3—C5—N4113.58 (13)
O1—C1—C4127.93 (11)N3—C5—H5123.2
N1—C1—C4110.78 (12)N4—C5—H5123.2
N2—C2—N1125.43 (13)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1···O1i0.881.912.7846 (18)172
N4—H4···N3ii0.881.952.8208 (19)168
C2—H2···N2iii0.952.603.376 (2)139
C5—H5···O1ii0.952.483.1933 (19)132
Symmetry codes: (i) x+1, y+1, z+1; (ii) x1, y+1/2, z1/2; (iii) x1, y+1, z.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC5H4N4O
Mr136.12
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/c
Temperature (K)292
a, b, c (Å)3.6725 (19), 17.960 (9), 9.010 (5)
β (°) 107.469 (19)
V3)566.9 (5)
Z4
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)0.12
Crystal size (mm)0.48 × 0.13 × 0.11
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker SMART APEXII CCD area-detector
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)
Tmin, Tmax0.979, 0.988
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
2981, 1113, 964
Rint0.016
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.617
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.036, 0.109, 1.04
No. of reflections1113
No. of parameters92
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.19, 0.19

Computer programs: SMART (Bruker, 2004), SAINT (Bruker, 2004), SAINT, SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), SHELXTL (Bruker, 2004), SHELXTL.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1···O1i0.881.912.7846 (18)171.8
N4—H4···N3ii0.881.952.8208 (19)167.9
C2—H2···N2iii0.952.603.376 (2)139.4
C5—H5···O1ii0.952.483.1933 (19)132.1
Symmetry codes: (i) x+1, y+1, z+1; (ii) x1, y+1/2, z1/2; (iii) x1, y+1, z.
 

Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds