Download citation
Download citation
link to html
Thio­acetamide complexes are used for the synthesis of metal sulfide powders. In the title mol­ecular complex, [CdI2(C2H5NS)2], the CdII atom is located on a twofold rotation axis and is tetra­hedrally coordinated by two iodine atoms and two thio­acetamide mol­ecules. The Cd—I distance is 2.7615 (17) Å and the Cd—S distance is 2.5586 (17) Å.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807044820/rk2044sup1.cif
Contains datablocks global, I

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807044820/rk2044Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

CCDC reference: 667121

Key indicators

  • Single-crystal X-ray study
  • T = 293 K
  • Mean [sigma](C-C) = 0.008 Å
  • R factor = 0.029
  • wR factor = 0.055
  • Data-to-parameter ratio = 26.8

checkCIF/PLATON results

No syntax errors found



Alert level B PLAT061_ALERT_3_B Tmax/Tmin Range Test RR' too Large ............. 0.64
Alert level C PLAT062_ALERT_4_C Rescale T(min) & T(max) by ..................... 0.80 PLAT232_ALERT_2_C Hirshfeld Test Diff (M-X) I1 - Cd1 .. 9.87 su PLAT242_ALERT_2_C Check Low Ueq as Compared to Neighbors for C1 PLAT250_ALERT_2_C Large U3/U1 Ratio for Average U(i,j) Tensor .... 2.46
Alert level G ABSTM02_ALERT_3_G When printed, the submitted absorption T values will be replaced by the scaled T values. Since the ratio of scaled T's is identical to the ratio of reported T values, the scaling does not imply a change to the absorption corrections used in the study. Ratio of Tmax expected/reported 0.797 Tmax scaled 0.069 Tmin scaled 0.055 PLAT199_ALERT_1_G Check the Reported _cell_measurement_temperature 293 K PLAT200_ALERT_1_G Check the Reported _diffrn_ambient_temperature . 293 K PLAT794_ALERT_5_G Check Predicted Bond Valency for Cd1 (2) 2.19
0 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem 1 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem 4 ALERT level C = Check and explain 4 ALERT level G = General alerts; check 2 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 3 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 2 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 1 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion 1 ALERT type 5 Informative message, check

Comment top

Thioacetamide complexes are used for synthesis of metal sulfide powders (Trindade et al., 1994; Grau & Akinc, 1997). Several structures of metal complexes with thioacetamide are reported. Cadmium chloride complex with thioacetamide CdCl2.CH3CSNH2 contains double chains of cadmium atoms with bridging chlorine atoms (Rolies & De Ranter, 1978). Two chains are shared through tridentate bridging chlorine atoms. Every cadmium atom is coordinated by five chlorine atoms and one sulfur atom of terminal thioacetamide molecule. In the zinc chloride complex with thioacetamide ZnCl2.2CH3CSNH2, zinc is tetrahedrally coordinated by two chlorine atoms and two thioacetamide molecules (Rolies & De Ranter, 1977a). The mercury chloride complex with thioacetamide HgCl2.2CH3CSNH2 is polymeric; adjacent mercury atoms linked through two bridging chlorine atoms (Rolies & De Ranter, 1977b). In this work, we report the crystal structure of diiodobis(thioacetamide)cadmium [Cd(CH3CSNH2)2I2]. The complex is molecular, cadmium is located on a twofold axis and tetrahedrally coordinated by two chlorine atoms and two thioacetamide molecules. Cd1—I1 distance is 2.7615 (17) Å and Cd1—S1 is 2.5586 (17) Å.

Related literature top

For the synthesis of metal sulfide powders, see: Trindade et al. (1994); Grau & Akinc (1997). For the structures of Zn, Cd and Hg halide complexes with thioacetamide, see: Rolies & De Ranter (1977a,b, 1978).

Experimental top

Cadmium iodide (1.0 g) and thioacetamide (0.4 g) were dissolved in water (6 ml) at room temperature. The solution was layered on a liquid perfluorinated hydrocarbon (1-methyldecahydronaphthalene). In 0.5 h colorless crystals formed and felt in 1-methyldecahydronaphthalene which served as protective environment. Yield 20%.

Refinement top

H atoms were positioned geometrically and refined using a riding model (including free rotation about C—C bond), with C—H = 0.96 Å, N—H = 0.86 Å, Uiso(H) = 1.2 (for NH2 and 1.5 (for CH3) times Ueq of the parent atom.

Structure description top

Thioacetamide complexes are used for synthesis of metal sulfide powders (Trindade et al., 1994; Grau & Akinc, 1997). Several structures of metal complexes with thioacetamide are reported. Cadmium chloride complex with thioacetamide CdCl2.CH3CSNH2 contains double chains of cadmium atoms with bridging chlorine atoms (Rolies & De Ranter, 1978). Two chains are shared through tridentate bridging chlorine atoms. Every cadmium atom is coordinated by five chlorine atoms and one sulfur atom of terminal thioacetamide molecule. In the zinc chloride complex with thioacetamide ZnCl2.2CH3CSNH2, zinc is tetrahedrally coordinated by two chlorine atoms and two thioacetamide molecules (Rolies & De Ranter, 1977a). The mercury chloride complex with thioacetamide HgCl2.2CH3CSNH2 is polymeric; adjacent mercury atoms linked through two bridging chlorine atoms (Rolies & De Ranter, 1977b). In this work, we report the crystal structure of diiodobis(thioacetamide)cadmium [Cd(CH3CSNH2)2I2]. The complex is molecular, cadmium is located on a twofold axis and tetrahedrally coordinated by two chlorine atoms and two thioacetamide molecules. Cd1—I1 distance is 2.7615 (17) Å and Cd1—S1 is 2.5586 (17) Å.

For the synthesis of metal sulfide powders, see: Trindade et al. (1994); Grau & Akinc (1997). For the structures of Zn, Cd and Hg halide complexes with thioacetamide, see: Rolies & De Ranter (1977a,b, 1978).

Computing details top

Data collection: CAD-4 EXPRESS (Enraf–Nonius, 1994); cell refinement: CAD-4 EXPRESS (Enraf–Nonius, 1994); data reduction: XCAD4 (Harms & Wocadlo, 1995); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997) view of the title complex, with the atom numbering scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are presented with 50% probability level. H atoms are drawn as spheres of arbitrary radius. Symmetry code: (i) -x + 1, y, -z + 3/2.
Diiodidobis(thioacetamide-κS)cadmium(II) top
Crystal data top
[Cd(I)2(C2H5NS)2]F(000) = 936
Mr = 516.49Dx = 2.637 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, PbcnMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2n 2abCell parameters from 25 reflections
a = 10.369 (9) Åθ = 13–14°
b = 9.809 (6) ŵ = 6.70 mm1
c = 12.792 (8) ÅT = 293 K
V = 1301.1 (16) Å3Prism, colourless
Z = 40.4 × 0.4 × 0.4 mm
Data collection top
Enraf–Nonius CAD4
diffractometer
Rint = 0
ω scansθmax = 27.0°, θmin = 2.9°
Absorption correction: ψ scan
(North et al., 1968)
h = 130
Tmin = 0.069, Tmax = 0.086k = 012
1418 measured reflectionsl = 016
1418 independent reflections1 standard reflections every 120 min
1115 reflections with I > 2σ(I) intensity decay: 1%
Refinement top
Refinement on F20 restraints
Least-squares matrix: fullH-atom parameters constrained
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.029 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0215P)2 + 0.5736P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
wR(F2) = 0.055(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
S = 1.03Δρmax = 0.49 e Å3
1418 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.58 e Å3
53 parameters
Crystal data top
[Cd(I)2(C2H5NS)2]V = 1301.1 (16) Å3
Mr = 516.49Z = 4
Orthorhombic, PbcnMo Kα radiation
a = 10.369 (9) ŵ = 6.70 mm1
b = 9.809 (6) ÅT = 293 K
c = 12.792 (8) Å0.4 × 0.4 × 0.4 mm
Data collection top
Enraf–Nonius CAD4
diffractometer
1115 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Absorption correction: ψ scan
(North et al., 1968)
Rint = 0
Tmin = 0.069, Tmax = 0.0861 standard reflections every 120 min
1418 measured reflections intensity decay: 1%
1418 independent reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0290 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.055H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.03Δρmax = 0.49 e Å3
1418 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.58 e Å3
53 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R–factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R–factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2σ(F2) is used only for calculating R–factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R–factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R–factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
I10.71665 (3)1.06035 (4)0.70992 (3)0.04723 (12)
Cd10.50000.90519 (6)0.75000.03851 (14)
S10.44664 (13)0.74390 (15)0.59888 (10)0.0504 (4)
C10.5480 (4)0.7604 (5)0.4977 (4)0.0379 (11)
N10.6340 (4)0.8524 (5)0.4899 (3)0.0656 (15)
H1A0.68210.85600.43520.079*
H1B0.64390.91100.53920.079*
C20.5367 (6)0.6619 (6)0.4086 (4)0.0641 (17)
H2A0.52440.71140.34460.096*
H2B0.46430.60280.42010.096*
H2C0.61400.60850.40390.096*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
I10.03944 (19)0.0613 (2)0.04098 (19)0.01312 (17)0.00435 (14)0.00932 (16)
Cd10.0327 (2)0.0548 (3)0.0280 (2)0.0000.0044 (2)0.000
S10.0453 (7)0.0710 (10)0.0348 (7)0.0217 (7)0.0110 (6)0.0112 (7)
C10.035 (2)0.051 (3)0.028 (2)0.001 (2)0.001 (2)0.001 (2)
N10.066 (3)0.091 (4)0.040 (3)0.035 (3)0.028 (2)0.020 (3)
C20.093 (5)0.051 (3)0.048 (3)0.007 (3)0.016 (3)0.012 (3)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
I1—Cd12.7615 (17)N1—H1A0.8607
Cd1—S12.5586 (17)N1—H1B0.8607
S1—C11.675 (5)C2—H2A0.9600
C1—N11.272 (6)C2—H2B0.9600
C1—C21.499 (7)C2—H2C0.9600
S1—Cd1—S1i103.61 (9)C1—N1—H1B120.0
S1—Cd1—I1112.11 (4)H1A—N1—H1B119.9
S1—Cd1—I1i107.77 (5)C1—C2—H2A109.5
I1—Cd1—I1i113.11 (6)C1—C2—H2B109.5
C1—S1—Cd1112.85 (19)H2A—C2—H2B109.5
N1—C1—C2116.9 (4)C1—C2—H2C109.5
N1—C1—S1124.7 (4)H2A—C2—H2C109.5
C2—C1—S1118.4 (4)H2B—C2—H2C109.5
C1—N1—H1A120.0
Symmetry code: (i) x+1, y, z+3/2.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula[Cd(I)2(C2H5NS)2]
Mr516.49
Crystal system, space groupOrthorhombic, Pbcn
Temperature (K)293
a, b, c (Å)10.369 (9), 9.809 (6), 12.792 (8)
V3)1301.1 (16)
Z4
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)6.70
Crystal size (mm)0.4 × 0.4 × 0.4
Data collection
DiffractometerEnraf–Nonius CAD4
Absorption correctionψ scan
(North et al., 1968)
Tmin, Tmax0.069, 0.086
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
1418, 1418, 1115
Rint0
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.638
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.029, 0.055, 1.03
No. of reflections1418
No. of parameters53
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.49, 0.58

Computer programs: CAD-4 EXPRESS (Enraf–Nonius, 1994), XCAD4 (Harms & Wocadlo, 1995), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997), WinGX (Farrugia, 1999).

 

Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds