Download citation
Download citation
link to html
Carbon monoxide (CO) has recently been shown to impart beneficial effects in mammalian physiology and considerable research attention is now being directed toward metal-carbonyl complexes as a means of delivering CO to bio­logical targets. Two ruthenium carbonyl complexes, namely trans-di­carbonyl­dichlorido­(4,5-di­aza­fluoren-9-one-[kappa]2N,N')ruthenium(II), [RuCl2(C11H6N2O)(CO)2], (1), and fac-tri­carbonyl­dichlorido­(4,5-di­aza­fluoren-9-one-[kappa]N)ruthenium(II), [RuCl2(C11H6N2O)(CO)3], (2), have been isolated and structurally characterized. In the case of complex (1), the trans-directing effect of the CO ligands allows bidentate coordination of the 4,5-di­aza­fluoren-9-one (dafo) ligand despite a larger bite distance between the N-donor atoms. In complex (2), the cis disposition of two chloride ligands restricts the ability of the dafo mol­ecule to bind ruthenium in a bidentate fashion. Both complexes exhibit well defined 1H NMR spectra confirming the diamagnetic ground state of RuII and display a strong absorption band around 300 nm in the UV.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S2053229615018100/ov3067sup1.cif
Contains datablocks 1, 2, global

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S2053229615018100/ov30671sup2.hkl
Contains datablock 1

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S2053229615018100/ov30672sup3.hkl
Contains datablock 2

CCDC references: 1427969; 1427968

Introduction top

Carbon monoxide (CO) has recently been shown to impart salutary effects in mammalian physiology when applied in lower concentrations (Motterlini & Otterbien, 2010). This surprising discovery has raised inetrest in metal–carbonyl complexes as potential CO donors. Although metal carbonyl complexes have been studied extensively for their photophysical and photochemical properties (Stufkens & Vlcek, 1998), considerable research attention has now been directed toward these species as means of delivering CO to biological targets under controlled conditions as opposed to its administration in the gaseous form (Bernardes & Garcia-Gallego, 2014; Romao et al., 2012). In such attempts, the photoactive CO-releasing molecules (photoCORMs) have emerged as promising therapeutics where CO release can be triggered upon illumination (Gonzalez & Mascharak, 2014; Chakraborty et al., 2014; Schatzschneider, 2015). Herein we report the syntheses, properties and X-ray structures of two ruthenium carbonyl complexes, namely trans[RuCl2(dafo)(CO)2], (1), and fac-[RuCl2(CO)3(dafo)(CO)3], (2), where dafo is 4,5-di­aza­fluoren-9-one. The potentially bidentate ligand dafo binds the RuII center of (1) and (2) in a bidentate and a monodentate fashion, respectively. Both steric and electronic effects play concurrent roles in di­cta­ting the mode of binding of dafo in these two complexes.

Experimental top

All reagents were of commercial grade and used without further purification. The solvents were purified according to a standard procedure (Armarego & Chai, 2003). 4,5-Di­aza­fluoren-9-one (dafo) was synthesized according to a reported procedure (Eckhard & Summers, 1973). A Perkin Elmer Spectrum-One FT–IR spectrophotometer was employed to monitor the IR spectra of the compounds. UV–Vis spectra were obtained with Varian Cary 50 UV–Vis spectrophotometer. 1H NMR spectra were recorded at 298 K on a Varian Unity Inova 500 MHz instrument. Microanalyses were carried out with a Perkin Elmer Series II Elemental Analyzer.

Synthesis and crystallization top

Synthesis of complex (1) top

A slurry of [RuCl2(CO)3]2 (100 mg, 0.195 mmol) in dry methanol (15 ml) was heated to reflux (338 K) while stirring for 3 h. Next, 4,5-di­aza­fluoren-9-one (dafo; 71.1 mg, 0.370 mmol) was added and the reaction mixture was allowed to reflux for an additional 3 h. The color of the solution changed from pale yellow to bright yellow during this time. Upon cooling, a yellow precipitate was observed which was then filtetred off, washed with a minimum amount of CH2Cl2, and dried under reduced pressure. (yield 72.8 mg, 48%). Elemental analysis (%) found: C 38.11, N 6.89, H 1.52; calculated for C13H6Cl2N2O3Ru: C 38.06, N 6.83, H 1.47. IR: ν(CO) (KBr, cm-1) 2078, 1993. 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 8.96 (d, 2H), 8.24 (d, 2H), 7.73 (t, 2H).

Synthesis of complex (2) top

A batch of [RuCl2(CO)3]2 (100 mg, 0.195 mmol) in dry methanol (20 ml) was allowed to stir at 318 K for 3 h. Next, dafo (71.2 mg, 0.370 mmol) was added and the solution was allowed to stir at 318 K for an additional 3 h. The white precipitate that formed during this time was filtered off, washed with a small amount of CH2Cl2, and dried under vacuum (yield: 90.9 mg, 56%). Elemental analysis (%) found: C 38.42, N 6.43, H 1.43; calculated for C14H6Cl2N2O4Ru: C 38.37, N 6.39, H 1.38. IR ν (CO) (KBr, cm-1) 2062, 1998. 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 9.70 (d, 1H), 8.76 (d, 1H), 8.20 (d, 1H), 8.15 (d, 1H), 7.70 (d, 1H), 7.62 (t, 1H).

Isolation of complexes (1) and (2) top

Single crystals for both the complexes were obtained by layering hexanes over their CH2Cl2 solutions. One crystal for each complex was selected and affixed on top of MiTiGen micromounts using Paratone Oil and tranferred to the diffractometer.

Refinement top

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 1. The metal atoms were located by direct methods and the remaining non-H atoms emerged from successive Fourier syntheses. H atoms were included in calculated positions riding on the C atom to which they are bonded, with C—H = 0.93 Å and Uiso(H) = 1.2Uiso(C). Carbonyl atoms C1 and O1 in (2) were constrained to have equivalent atomic displacement parameters and the C6—C7 bond was restrained to emulate rigid-body motion.

Results and discussion top

The complexes trans-[RuCl2(dafo)(CO)2] (dafo is 4,5-di­aza­fluoren-9-one), (1), and fac-[RuCl2(dafo)(CO)3], (2), were isolated from the reaction of [RuCl2(CO)3]2 with 2 equivalents of dafo in methanol. Complex (1) was isolated from the methano­lic reaction mixture under refluxing conditions. Quite in contrast, stirring of the reaction mixture in methanol at 318 K resulted in (2). In accordance with our previous report on cis- and trans-[RuCl2(azpy)(CO)2] [where azpy is 2-(phenyl­diazenyl)pyridine] complexes (Carrington et al., 2013), warming of [RuCl2(CO)3]2 at 318 K presumably resulted in the inter­mediate solvento species fac-[RuCl2(MeOH)(CO)3]. Addition of dafo displaced the solvent molecule to furnish complex (2), where the dafo ligand binds the RuII center in a monodentate fashion. This finding is unusual compared to that observed for other analogous carbonyl complexes derived from rigid heterocycles like bi­pyridine (bpy), where, under similar conditions, the complex isolated is of formula cis-[RuCl2(bpy)(CO)2] (Haukka et al., 1995). In the case of complex (2), the relatively larger bite distance between the two N atoms of the dafo ligand (compared to bpy) most likely restricts bidentate coordination to the metal center (Pal et al., 2014). In the case of (1), the inter­mediate species fac-[RuCl2(MeOH)(CO)3] undergoes a facial meridional isomerization upon refluxing (338 K). In this meridional inter­mediate, trans disposition of the two CO ligands across each other facilitates removal of one CO. This vacancy finally allows binding of the dafo ligand in a bidenate fashion in (1).

The coordination geometry of RuII in both complexes is distorted o­cta­hedral (Tables 2 and 3). The two CO ligands are cis to each other in complex (1) (Fig. 1), while in complex (2) (Fig. 2), the three CO ligands are arranged in a facial disposition. The two Cl- ligands are in trans and cis dispositions in (1) and (2), respectively. In complex (1), the chelate ring composed of atoms Ru1, N1, C7, C9, and N2 is almost planar, with a mean deviation of 0.007 (3) Å. The equatorial plane of (1) is comprised of the bidentate dafo ligand and two CO ligands (atoms C1, C2, N2, and N1), with a mean deviation of 0.040 (3) Å and the RuII atom is displaced by 0.010 (3) Å towards the Cl2 atom. The coordinated dafo ligand is planar [mean deviation = 0.020 (3) Å] in complex (1). In the case of complex (2), the equatorial plane is comprised of one N atom of the monodentate dafo ligand, one chloride and two CO ligands (atoms N1, Cl2, C1, and C3), with a mean deviation of 0.034 (4) Å. The RuII atom is displaced by 0.059 (4) Å towards the carbonyl C2 atom. In this case, the dafo ligand frame is also fairly planar, with a mean deviation of 0.028 (3) Å. The monodentate dafo ligand in (2) forms a dihedral angle of 52.16 (8)° with the equatorial plane constitued by atoms C1, C3, N1, and Cl2. The crystal packing (Dolomanov et al., 2009; Spek, 2009) for the complexes reveal no significant stacking or other nonbonded inter­actions (Figs. 3 and 4). The distance between the two N atoms (N1 and N2) of dafo in (1) and (2) are 2.833 (4) and 3.146 (5) Å, respectively, due to different modes of binding. The bidenate coordination of dafo in (1) apprears to promote pronounced competition in π back-bonding between the dafo and CO ligands for the same metal orbitals compared to complex (2). This is corroborated by the apparent CO release rate (kCO) values of these complexes. In CH2Cl2 solution under 305 nm UV illumination, complex (1) exhibits a much higher kCO value (15.34±0.02 min-1, conc. 2.4 × 10-4 M) compared to complex (2) (6.08±0.02 min-1, conc. 2.4 × 10-4 M).

Computing details top

For both compounds, data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2008); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2008); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2008); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Bruker 2008) and OLEX2 (Dolomanov et al., 2009); software used to prepare material for publication: publCIF (Westrip, 2010).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. A perspective view of complex (1), showing the atom-labeling. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. A perspective view of complex (2), showing the atom-labeling. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level.
[Figure 3] Fig. 3. The crystal packing of complex (1), showing a view along the b axis.
[Figure 4] Fig. 4. The crystal packing of complex (2), showing a view along the b axis.
(1) trans-Dicarbonyldichlorido(4,5-diazafluoren-9-one-κ2N,N')ruthenium(II) top
Crystal data top
[RuCl2(C11H6N2O)(CO)2]F(000) = 800
Mr = 410.17Dx = 1.958 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 6.5589 (2) ÅCell parameters from 9050 reflections
b = 16.9199 (6) Åθ = 2.4–26.3°
c = 12.7585 (5) ŵ = 1.52 mm1
β = 100.69°T = 296 K
V = 1391.30 (8) Å3Block, colorless
Z = 40.20 × 0.15 × 0.12 mm
Data collection top
Bruker APEXII CCD
diffractometer
2840 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube2598 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Detector resolution: 8.33 pixels mm-1Rint = 0.055
ω scansθmax = 26.4°, θmin = 2.0°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2008)
h = 88
Tmin = 0.668, Tmax = 0.745k = 2121
13644 measured reflectionsl = 1515
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.029Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.076H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.01 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0393P)2 + 1.2351P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2840 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
190 parametersΔρmax = 1.02 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.42 e Å3
Crystal data top
[RuCl2(C11H6N2O)(CO)2]V = 1391.30 (8) Å3
Mr = 410.17Z = 4
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation
a = 6.5589 (2) ŵ = 1.52 mm1
b = 16.9199 (6) ÅT = 296 K
c = 12.7585 (5) Å0.20 × 0.15 × 0.12 mm
β = 100.69°
Data collection top
Bruker APEXII CCD
diffractometer
2840 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2008)
2598 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.668, Tmax = 0.745Rint = 0.055
13644 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0290 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.076H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.01Δρmax = 1.02 e Å3
2840 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.42 e Å3
190 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Ru10.70714 (3)0.37385 (2)0.63595 (2)0.03500 (10)
Cl10.94807 (12)0.34857 (5)0.79811 (6)0.05222 (19)
Cl20.49226 (13)0.38504 (5)0.46405 (7)0.0547 (2)
O30.7415 (4)0.01600 (13)0.5327 (3)0.0766 (8)
O20.9657 (4)0.51454 (14)0.6069 (2)0.0628 (6)
O10.4360 (5)0.47572 (18)0.7402 (2)0.0803 (8)
N10.5457 (3)0.26370 (14)0.66326 (18)0.0392 (5)
N20.8830 (3)0.29170 (13)0.55820 (17)0.0352 (5)
C30.3910 (4)0.2398 (2)0.7137 (2)0.0481 (7)
H30.32070.27750.74650.058*
C40.3349 (5)0.1611 (2)0.7178 (2)0.0564 (8)
H40.23070.14730.75480.068*
C50.4305 (5)0.1020 (2)0.6679 (3)0.0590 (9)
H50.39120.04930.66990.071*
C60.5859 (5)0.12555 (16)0.6158 (3)0.0489 (7)
C70.6332 (4)0.20550 (16)0.6183 (2)0.0401 (6)
C90.8043 (4)0.21970 (15)0.5641 (2)0.0373 (6)
C131.0409 (4)0.29571 (17)0.5048 (2)0.0396 (6)
H131.10210.34450.49780.048*
C121.1159 (4)0.23020 (18)0.4600 (2)0.0446 (6)
H121.22570.23600.42390.054*
C111.0311 (5)0.15600 (19)0.4678 (2)0.0474 (7)
H111.08140.11170.43780.057*
C100.8679 (4)0.15088 (17)0.5223 (2)0.0434 (6)
C80.7321 (5)0.08520 (17)0.5532 (3)0.0531 (8)
C20.8658 (5)0.46283 (17)0.6145 (2)0.0431 (6)
C10.5301 (5)0.43934 (19)0.7038 (3)0.0514 (7)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Ru10.03214 (14)0.03422 (14)0.04105 (15)0.00096 (7)0.01306 (10)0.00192 (8)
Cl10.0427 (4)0.0715 (5)0.0438 (4)0.0011 (3)0.0117 (3)0.0017 (3)
Cl20.0477 (4)0.0553 (4)0.0600 (5)0.0021 (3)0.0075 (4)0.0063 (3)
O30.0714 (17)0.0331 (12)0.120 (2)0.0023 (11)0.0029 (16)0.0037 (13)
O20.0662 (15)0.0503 (13)0.0734 (16)0.0131 (12)0.0170 (13)0.0006 (11)
O10.0791 (19)0.090 (2)0.0798 (19)0.0227 (16)0.0357 (16)0.0011 (16)
N10.0333 (11)0.0471 (13)0.0383 (11)0.0028 (9)0.0099 (9)0.0030 (10)
N20.0339 (11)0.0349 (11)0.0381 (11)0.0020 (9)0.0102 (9)0.0008 (9)
C30.0355 (14)0.071 (2)0.0372 (14)0.0094 (13)0.0063 (12)0.0048 (14)
C40.0457 (17)0.078 (2)0.0445 (16)0.0208 (16)0.0050 (14)0.0157 (16)
C50.0563 (19)0.0563 (19)0.0586 (19)0.0226 (16)0.0041 (16)0.0186 (16)
C60.0472 (17)0.0401 (16)0.0555 (18)0.0052 (12)0.0009 (14)0.0106 (12)
C70.0366 (13)0.0383 (14)0.0447 (15)0.0038 (11)0.0058 (11)0.0052 (11)
C90.0342 (13)0.0361 (13)0.0411 (14)0.0025 (10)0.0058 (11)0.0006 (11)
C130.0369 (14)0.0436 (14)0.0395 (14)0.0010 (11)0.0101 (11)0.0032 (11)
C120.0421 (15)0.0553 (17)0.0376 (14)0.0100 (13)0.0104 (12)0.0025 (12)
C110.0463 (16)0.0481 (16)0.0447 (15)0.0156 (13)0.0004 (13)0.0103 (13)
C100.0416 (15)0.0366 (13)0.0480 (16)0.0055 (12)0.0023 (12)0.0023 (12)
C80.0511 (17)0.0360 (15)0.065 (2)0.0023 (13)0.0069 (15)0.0035 (14)
C20.0473 (16)0.0381 (14)0.0453 (15)0.0033 (12)0.0122 (13)0.0059 (12)
C10.0531 (18)0.0444 (17)0.0552 (18)0.0069 (14)0.0063 (15)0.0029 (14)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Ru1—C21.879 (3)C4—C51.395 (5)
Ru1—C11.923 (3)C4—H40.9300
Ru1—N22.161 (2)C5—C61.375 (5)
Ru1—N12.203 (2)C5—H50.9300
Ru1—Cl22.3844 (9)C6—C71.387 (4)
Ru1—Cl12.3974 (8)C6—C81.519 (5)
O3—C81.204 (4)C7—C91.443 (4)
O2—C21.108 (4)C9—C101.377 (4)
O1—C11.040 (4)C13—C121.379 (4)
N1—C71.323 (4)C13—H130.9300
N1—C31.360 (3)C12—C111.384 (4)
N2—C91.330 (3)C12—H120.9300
N2—C131.343 (3)C11—C101.383 (4)
C3—C41.385 (5)C11—H110.9300
C3—H30.9300C10—C81.521 (4)
C2—Ru1—C190.05 (13)C6—C5—H5121.6
C2—Ru1—N295.24 (10)C4—C5—H5121.6
C1—Ru1—N2174.48 (11)C5—C6—C7117.0 (3)
C2—Ru1—N1175.16 (10)C5—C6—C8136.2 (3)
C1—Ru1—N193.90 (11)C7—C6—C8106.8 (3)
N2—Ru1—N180.89 (8)N1—C7—C6128.5 (3)
C2—Ru1—Cl292.93 (9)N1—C7—C9121.5 (2)
C1—Ru1—Cl293.72 (10)C6—C7—C9110.0 (3)
N2—Ru1—Cl284.47 (6)N2—C9—C10127.1 (3)
N1—Ru1—Cl289.61 (6)N2—C9—C7121.6 (2)
C2—Ru1—Cl188.54 (9)C10—C9—C7111.3 (2)
C1—Ru1—Cl194.06 (10)N2—C13—C12122.5 (3)
N2—Ru1—Cl187.65 (6)N2—C13—H13118.7
N1—Ru1—Cl188.39 (6)C12—C13—H13118.7
Cl2—Ru1—Cl1172.08 (3)C13—C12—C11121.4 (3)
C7—N1—C3114.0 (3)C13—C12—H12119.3
C7—N1—Ru1107.51 (17)C11—C12—H12119.3
C3—N1—Ru1138.5 (2)C12—C11—C10116.8 (3)
C9—N2—C13114.8 (2)C12—C11—H11121.6
C9—N2—Ru1108.51 (16)C10—C11—H11121.6
C13—N2—Ru1136.70 (18)C9—C10—C11117.4 (3)
N1—C3—C4122.0 (3)C9—C10—C8106.5 (3)
N1—C3—H3119.0C11—C10—C8136.1 (3)
C4—C3—H3119.0O3—C8—C6127.9 (3)
C3—C4—C5121.8 (3)O3—C8—C10126.8 (3)
C3—C4—H4119.1C6—C8—C10105.4 (2)
C5—C4—H4119.1O2—C2—Ru1176.3 (3)
C6—C5—C4116.7 (3)O1—C1—Ru1178.9 (3)
(2) fac-Tricarbonyldichlorido(4,5-diazafluoren-9-one-κN)ruthenium(II) top
Crystal data top
[RuCl2(C11H6N2O)(CO)3]Z = 2
Mr = 438.18F(000) = 428
Triclinic, P1Dx = 1.853 Mg m3
a = 7.458 (2) ÅMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
b = 9.701 (2) ÅCell parameters from 2934 reflections
c = 11.594 (9) Åθ = 2.7–26.0°
α = 90.43 (3)°µ = 1.36 mm1
β = 108.60 (4)°T = 296 K
γ = 98.41 (2)°Block, colorless
V = 785.1 (7) Å30.15 × 0.10 × 0.08 mm
Data collection top
Bruker APEXII CCD
diffractometer
2934 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube2141 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Detector resolution: 8.33 pixels mm-1Rint = 0.049
ω scansθmax = 25.7°, θmin = 1.9°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2008)
h = 99
Tmin = 0.682, Tmax = 0.745k = 1111
7433 measured reflectionsl = 1414
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.037Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.060H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.13 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2)]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2934 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
202 parametersΔρmax = 0.74 e Å3
1 restraintΔρmin = 0.60 e Å3
Crystal data top
[RuCl2(C11H6N2O)(CO)3]γ = 98.41 (2)°
Mr = 438.18V = 785.1 (7) Å3
Triclinic, P1Z = 2
a = 7.458 (2) ÅMo Kα radiation
b = 9.701 (2) ŵ = 1.36 mm1
c = 11.594 (9) ÅT = 296 K
α = 90.43 (3)°0.15 × 0.10 × 0.08 mm
β = 108.60 (4)°
Data collection top
Bruker APEXII CCD
diffractometer
2934 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2008)
2141 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.682, Tmax = 0.745Rint = 0.049
7433 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0371 restraint
wR(F2) = 0.060H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.13Δρmax = 0.74 e Å3
2934 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.60 e Å3
202 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Ru10.34512 (5)0.19385 (3)0.80951 (3)0.05637 (13)
Cl10.31437 (16)0.05628 (10)0.78187 (11)0.0812 (4)
Cl20.01300 (14)0.19209 (12)0.69578 (13)0.0944 (4)
O10.2193 (5)0.1340 (3)1.0283 (3)0.0996 (9)
O20.3520 (4)0.5013 (3)0.8646 (2)0.0701 (8)
O40.7583 (4)0.4634 (3)0.4104 (3)0.0928 (10)
O30.7628 (4)0.1844 (3)0.9465 (3)0.0816 (9)
N10.4091 (4)0.2135 (3)0.6401 (3)0.0517 (8)
N20.7099 (4)0.4535 (3)0.8075 (3)0.0539 (8)
C10.2690 (8)0.1590 (5)0.9463 (5)0.0996 (9)
C20.3567 (5)0.3899 (4)0.8389 (3)0.0543 (10)
C140.5432 (5)0.3041 (4)0.6140 (3)0.0472 (9)
C130.6820 (5)0.4209 (4)0.6922 (4)0.0460 (9)
C90.7831 (5)0.4932 (4)0.6231 (4)0.0558 (10)
C80.7136 (6)0.4259 (5)0.4978 (4)0.0647 (12)
C70.5671 (6)0.3054 (4)0.5003 (4)0.0552 (10)
C60.4577 (7)0.2099 (5)0.4087 (4)0.0749 (13)
H60.47510.20880.33280.090*
C50.3210 (7)0.1158 (5)0.4337 (4)0.0775 (14)
H50.24320.04890.37400.093*
C40.2986 (6)0.1201 (4)0.5465 (4)0.0706 (12)
H40.20290.05600.56020.085*
C100.9183 (6)0.6085 (4)0.6741 (5)0.0684 (12)
H100.98660.65930.62970.082*
C110.9465 (6)0.6442 (4)0.7941 (5)0.0739 (13)
H111.03490.72180.83310.089*
C120.8448 (6)0.5657 (4)0.8559 (4)0.0644 (11)
H120.87030.59130.93770.077*
C30.6052 (7)0.1911 (4)0.8956 (4)0.0611 (11)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Ru10.0571 (2)0.0437 (2)0.0766 (3)0.00962 (15)0.03234 (18)0.00607 (16)
Cl10.0980 (8)0.0420 (6)0.1220 (10)0.0094 (6)0.0617 (8)0.0079 (6)
Cl20.0528 (7)0.0710 (8)0.1545 (12)0.0099 (6)0.0270 (7)0.0064 (8)
O10.129 (2)0.0729 (17)0.141 (3)0.0402 (16)0.094 (2)0.0351 (17)
O20.089 (2)0.0517 (19)0.073 (2)0.0212 (17)0.0251 (16)0.0041 (16)
O40.099 (2)0.131 (3)0.074 (2)0.044 (2)0.0520 (19)0.0392 (19)
O30.074 (2)0.082 (2)0.089 (2)0.0230 (18)0.0218 (19)0.0225 (17)
N10.054 (2)0.0403 (19)0.058 (2)0.0090 (16)0.0139 (17)0.0020 (16)
N20.056 (2)0.049 (2)0.056 (2)0.0045 (16)0.0185 (18)0.0003 (17)
C10.129 (2)0.0729 (17)0.141 (3)0.0402 (16)0.094 (2)0.0351 (17)
C20.051 (2)0.062 (3)0.050 (3)0.010 (2)0.016 (2)0.009 (2)
C140.047 (2)0.049 (3)0.049 (3)0.0187 (19)0.016 (2)0.004 (2)
C130.047 (2)0.040 (2)0.057 (3)0.0170 (18)0.019 (2)0.011 (2)
C90.050 (2)0.059 (3)0.071 (3)0.023 (2)0.030 (2)0.020 (2)
C80.064 (3)0.082 (3)0.068 (3)0.039 (2)0.035 (3)0.026 (3)
C70.057 (3)0.062 (3)0.050 (3)0.027 (2)0.014 (2)0.001 (2)
C60.085 (3)0.088 (4)0.059 (3)0.042 (3)0.021 (3)0.005 (3)
C50.094 (4)0.064 (3)0.057 (3)0.019 (3)0.003 (3)0.021 (2)
C40.067 (3)0.053 (3)0.079 (4)0.006 (2)0.008 (3)0.007 (3)
C100.052 (3)0.055 (3)0.108 (4)0.010 (2)0.039 (3)0.024 (3)
C110.064 (3)0.058 (3)0.096 (4)0.003 (2)0.023 (3)0.005 (3)
C120.066 (3)0.055 (3)0.065 (3)0.007 (2)0.012 (2)0.004 (2)
C30.080 (3)0.046 (3)0.069 (3)0.012 (2)0.039 (3)0.011 (2)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Ru1—C11.865 (5)C13—C91.394 (5)
Ru1—C31.882 (5)C9—C101.377 (5)
Ru1—C21.914 (4)C9—C81.488 (5)
Ru1—N12.168 (3)C8—C71.486 (5)
Ru1—Cl22.4037 (16)C7—C61.365 (5)
Ru1—Cl12.4128 (12)C6—C51.370 (6)
O1—C11.141 (5)C6—H60.9300
O2—C21.128 (4)C5—C41.372 (5)
O4—C81.206 (4)C5—H50.9300
O3—C31.146 (4)C4—H40.9300
N1—C141.344 (4)C10—C111.373 (5)
N1—C41.369 (4)C10—H100.9300
N2—C131.314 (4)C11—C121.362 (5)
N2—C121.350 (4)C11—H110.9300
C14—C71.385 (5)C12—H120.9300
C14—C131.490 (5)
C1—Ru1—C393.5 (2)C10—C9—C8131.2 (4)
C1—Ru1—C289.90 (18)C13—C9—C8108.6 (4)
C3—Ru1—C295.34 (16)O4—C8—C7126.6 (4)
C1—Ru1—N1173.34 (18)O4—C8—C9128.1 (4)
C3—Ru1—N190.43 (15)C7—C8—C9105.2 (4)
C2—Ru1—N195.11 (13)C6—C7—C14121.1 (4)
C1—Ru1—Cl287.35 (18)C6—C7—C8129.3 (4)
C3—Ru1—Cl2178.40 (13)C14—C7—C8109.5 (4)
C2—Ru1—Cl286.04 (12)C7—C6—C5117.0 (4)
N1—Ru1—Cl288.62 (10)C7—C6—H6121.5
C1—Ru1—Cl185.99 (15)C5—C6—H6121.5
C3—Ru1—Cl186.50 (12)C6—C5—C4120.2 (4)
C2—Ru1—Cl1175.60 (11)C6—C5—H5119.9
N1—Ru1—Cl188.86 (9)C4—C5—H5119.9
Cl2—Ru1—Cl192.18 (5)N1—C4—C5123.6 (4)
C14—N1—C4115.2 (3)N1—C4—H4118.2
C14—N1—Ru1129.1 (3)C5—C4—H4118.2
C4—N1—Ru1115.7 (3)C11—C10—C9116.3 (4)
C13—N2—C12114.9 (3)C11—C10—H10121.9
O1—C1—Ru1177.9 (5)C9—C10—H10121.9
O2—C2—Ru1172.3 (3)C12—C11—C10119.8 (4)
N1—C14—C7122.9 (4)C12—C11—H11120.1
N1—C14—C13129.2 (3)C10—C11—H11120.1
C7—C14—C13107.9 (4)N2—C12—C11125.0 (4)
N2—C13—C9123.9 (4)N2—C12—H12117.5
N2—C13—C14127.4 (3)C11—C12—H12117.5
C9—C13—C14108.7 (3)O3—C3—Ru1177.4 (4)
C10—C9—C13120.1 (4)

Experimental details

(1)(2)
Crystal data
Chemical formula[RuCl2(C11H6N2O)(CO)2][RuCl2(C11H6N2O)(CO)3]
Mr410.17438.18
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/nTriclinic, P1
Temperature (K)296296
a, b, c (Å)6.5589 (2), 16.9199 (6), 12.7585 (5)7.458 (2), 9.701 (2), 11.594 (9)
α, β, γ (°)90, 100.69, 9090.43 (3), 108.60 (4), 98.41 (2)
V3)1391.30 (8)785.1 (7)
Z42
Radiation typeMo KαMo Kα
µ (mm1)1.521.36
Crystal size (mm)0.20 × 0.15 × 0.120.15 × 0.10 × 0.08
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker APEXII CCD
diffractometer
Bruker APEXII CCD
diffractometer
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2008)
Multi-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2008)
Tmin, Tmax0.668, 0.7450.682, 0.745
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
13644, 2840, 2598 7433, 2934, 2141
Rint0.0550.049
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.6250.609
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.029, 0.076, 1.01 0.037, 0.060, 1.13
No. of reflections28402934
No. of parameters190202
No. of restraints01
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrainedH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)1.02, 0.420.74, 0.60

Computer programs: APEX2 (Bruker, 2008), SAINT (Bruker, 2008), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015), SHELXTL (Bruker 2008) and OLEX2 (Dolomanov et al., 2009), publCIF (Westrip, 2010).

Selected geometric parameters (Å, º) for (1) top
Ru1—C21.879 (3)Ru1—N12.203 (2)
Ru1—C11.923 (3)Ru1—Cl22.3844 (9)
Ru1—N22.161 (2)Ru1—Cl12.3974 (8)
C2—Ru1—C190.05 (13)N2—Ru1—Cl284.47 (6)
C2—Ru1—N295.24 (10)N1—Ru1—Cl289.61 (6)
C1—Ru1—N2174.48 (11)C2—Ru1—Cl188.54 (9)
C2—Ru1—N1175.16 (10)C1—Ru1—Cl194.06 (10)
C1—Ru1—N193.90 (11)N2—Ru1—Cl187.65 (6)
N2—Ru1—N180.89 (8)N1—Ru1—Cl188.39 (6)
C2—Ru1—Cl292.93 (9)Cl2—Ru1—Cl1172.08 (3)
C1—Ru1—Cl293.72 (10)
Selected geometric parameters (Å, º) for (2) top
Ru1—C11.865 (5)Ru1—N12.168 (3)
Ru1—C31.882 (5)Ru1—Cl22.4037 (16)
Ru1—C21.914 (4)Ru1—Cl12.4128 (12)
C1—Ru1—C393.5 (2)C2—Ru1—Cl286.04 (12)
C1—Ru1—C289.90 (18)N1—Ru1—Cl288.62 (10)
C3—Ru1—C295.34 (16)C1—Ru1—Cl185.99 (15)
C1—Ru1—N1173.34 (18)C3—Ru1—Cl186.50 (12)
C3—Ru1—N190.43 (15)C2—Ru1—Cl1175.60 (11)
C2—Ru1—N195.11 (13)N1—Ru1—Cl188.86 (9)
C1—Ru1—Cl287.35 (18)Cl2—Ru1—Cl192.18 (5)
C3—Ru1—Cl2178.40 (13)
 

Follow Acta Cryst. C
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds