Download citation
Download citation
link to html
Possible crystal structures of ethyl-tert-butyl ether (ETBE) were predicted by global lattice-energy minimizations using the force-field approach. 33 structures were found within an energy range of 2 kJ mol-1 above the global minimum. Low-temperature crystallization experiments were carried out at 80-160 K. The crystal structure was determined from X-ray powder data. ETBE crystallizes in C2/m, Z = 4, with molecules on mirror planes. The ETBE molecule adopts a trans conformation with a (CH3)3C-O-C-C torsion angle of 180°. The experimental structure corresponds with high accuracy to the predicted structure with energy rank 2, which has an energy of 0.54 kJ mol-1 above the global minimum and is the most dense low-energy structure. In some crystallization experiments a second polymorph was observed, but the quality of the powder data did not allow the determination of the crystal structure. Possibilities and limitations are discussed for solving crystal structures from powder diffraction data by real-space methods and lattice-energy minimizations.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108768111001169/og5046sup1.cif
Contains datablocks ETBE, I

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108768111001169/og5046Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

txt

Text file https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108768111001169/og5046sup3.txt
Supplementary material

pdf

Portable Document Format (PDF) file https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108768111001169/og5046sup4.pdf
Extra figures and tables

CCDC reference: 822665

Computing details top

Data collection: STOE WinXPOW (STOE & Cie GmbH, 2005); cell refinement: TOPAS Academic (Coelho, 2007); data reduction: DASH (David et al., 2006); program(s) used to solve structure: DASH (David et al., 2006); program(s) used to refine structure: TOPAS Academic (Coelho, 2007); molecular graphics: Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: publCIF (Westrip, 2009).

Figures top
[Figure 1]
[Figure 2]
[Figure 3]
[Figure 4]
[Figure 5]
[Figure 6]
2-ethoxy-2-methylpropane top
Crystal data top
C6H14Onone
Mr = 102.17Dx = 0.971 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/mCu Kα1 radiation, λ = 1.54056 Å
a = 14.7170 (3) ŵ = 0.49 mm1
b = 7.76462 (17) ÅT = 123 K
c = 6.22813 (16) ÅParticle morphology: no specific habit
β = 101.0148 (15)°colourless
V = 698.59 (3) Å3cylinder, 10 × 0.7 mm
Z = 4Specimen preparation: Prepared at 123 K
F(000) = 232.0
Data collection top
STOE Stadi-P
diffractometer
Data collection mode: transmission
Primary focussing, Ge 111 monochromatorScan method: step
Specimen mounting: glass capillary2θmin = 5.0°, 2θmax = 69.99°, 2θstep = 0.01°
Refinement top
Least-squares matrix: full with fixed elements per cycle114 parameters
Rp = 0.03432 restraints
Rwp = 0.0460 constraints
Rexp = 0.017All H-atom parameters refined
χ2 = 7.366Weighting scheme based on measured s.u.'s
6500 data points(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
Excluded region(s): noneBackground function: Chebyshev with 50 terms
Profile function: modified Thompson-Cox-Hastings pseudo-Voigt(Young, 1993)Preferred orientation correction: Correction based on March (1932)
Crystal data top
C6H14OV = 698.59 (3) Å3
Mr = 102.17Z = 4
Monoclinic, C2/mCu Kα1 radiation, λ = 1.54056 Å
a = 14.7170 (3) ŵ = 0.49 mm1
b = 7.76462 (17) ÅT = 123 K
c = 6.22813 (16) Åcylinder, 10 × 0.7 mm
β = 101.0148 (15)°
Data collection top
STOE Stadi-P
diffractometer
Scan method: step
Specimen mounting: glass capillary2θmin = 5.0°, 2θmax = 69.99°, 2θstep = 0.01°
Data collection mode: transmission
Refinement top
Rp = 0.0346500 data points
Rwp = 0.046114 parameters
Rexp = 0.01732 restraints
χ2 = 7.366All H-atom parameters refined
Special details top

Experimental. specimen was rotated, amorphous SiO2 in glass capillary

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O40.26110 (11)0.000000.3763 (3)0.0337*
C10.14543 (12)0.000000.5910 (3)0.0337*
C20.16127 (12)0.000000.3546 (3)0.0337*
C30.11775 (10)0.16530 (19)0.2431 (3)0.0337*
C50.29674 (12)0.000000.1785 (3)0.0337*
C60.40379 (12)0.000000.2339 (3)0.0337*
H1A0.0702 (4)0.000000.5947 (14)0.0405*
H1B0.1790 (3)0.1103 (5)0.6798 (7)0.0405*
H3A0.0444 (3)0.1729 (5)0.2514 (7)0.0405*
H3B0.1531 (3)0.2799 (6)0.3186 (8)0.0405*
H3C0.1234 (3)0.1648 (6)0.0743 (8)0.0405*
H5A0.2728 (3)0.1122 (5)0.0794 (8)0.0405*
H6A0.4319 (4)0.000000.0828 (12)0.0405*
H6B0.4288 (3)0.1122 (5)0.3297 (8)0.0405*
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
O4—C21.450 (2)C3—H3A1.092 (5)
O4—C51.428 (3)C3—H3B1.091 (5)
C1—C21.534 (3)C3—H3C1.070 (5)
C2—C31.5394 (19)C5—H5A1.087 (4)
C5—C61.547 (3)C6—H6A1.098 (7)
C1—H1A1.112 (6)C6—H6B1.080 (4)
C1—H1B1.086 (4)
C2—O4—C5116.89 (16)C2—C3—H3C109.7 (3)
O4—C2—C1104.34 (15)H3A—C3—H3B109.3 (3)
O4—C2—C3111.65 (10)H3A—C3—H3C108.0 (4)
C1—C2—C3107.85 (11)H3B—C3—H3C107.8 (4)
O4—C5—C6109.50 (15)O4—C5—H5A110.9 (3)
C2—C1—H1A110.8 (5)C6—C5—H5A109.4 (3)
C2—C1—H1B110.6 (3)C5—C6—H6A110.1 (4)
H1A—C1—H1B110.3 (4)C5—C6—H6B110.4 (3)
C2—C3—H3A110.7 (2)H6A—C6—H6B109.2 (3)
C2—C3—H3B111.3 (3)

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC6H14O
Mr102.17
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, C2/m
Temperature (K)123
a, b, c (Å)14.7170 (3), 7.76462 (17), 6.22813 (16)
β (°) 101.0148 (15)
V3)698.59 (3)
Z4
Radiation typeCu Kα1, λ = 1.54056 Å
µ (mm1)0.49
Specimen shape, size (mm)Cylinder, 10 × 0.7
Data collection
DiffractometerSTOE Stadi-P
diffractometer
Specimen mountingGlass capillary
Data collection modeTransmission
Scan methodStep
2θ values (°)2θmin = 5.0 2θmax = 69.99 2θstep = 0.01
Refinement
R factors and goodness of fitRp = 0.034, Rwp = 0.046, Rexp = 0.017, χ2 = 7.366
No. of data points6500
No. of parameters114
No. of restraints32
H-atom treatmentAll H-atom parameters refined

Computer programs: STOE WinXPOW (STOE & Cie GmbH, 2005), TOPAS Academic (Coelho, 2007), DASH (David et al., 2006), Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008), publCIF (Westrip, 2009).

 

Follow Acta Cryst. B
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds