Download citation
Download citation
link to html
The title compound, (C8H12N)2[MoS4], was synthesized by the aqueous reaction of ammonium tetra­thio­molybdate with benzyl­(methyl)­amine in a 1:2 molar ratio. The structure consists of a slightly distorted tetra­hedral [MoS4]2− dianion and two crystallographically independent benzyl­(methyl)­ammonium cations, with all atoms located in general positions. The cations and anions are linked by weak N—H...S and C—H...S inter­actions, the strength and number of which can explain the observed Mo—S bond distances.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807049562/nc2064sup1.cif
Contains datablocks I, global

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807049562/nc2064Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

CCDC reference: 667166

Key indicators

  • Single-crystal X-ray study
  • T = 298 K
  • Mean [sigma](C-C) = 0.009 Å
  • R factor = 0.050
  • wR factor = 0.100
  • Data-to-parameter ratio = 17.3

checkCIF/PLATON results

No syntax errors found



Alert level C PLAT029_ALERT_3_C _diffrn_measured_fraction_theta_full Low ....... 0.98 PLAT242_ALERT_2_C Check Low Ueq as Compared to Neighbors for Mo1 PLAT331_ALERT_2_C Small Average Phenyl C-C Dist. C1 -C6 1.37 Ang. PLAT342_ALERT_3_C Low Bond Precision on C-C Bonds (x 1000) Ang ... 9 PLAT480_ALERT_4_C Long H...A H-Bond Reported H2B .. S2 .. 2.93 Ang. PLAT480_ALERT_4_C Long H...A H-Bond Reported H7B .. S3 .. 2.92 Ang. PLAT480_ALERT_4_C Long H...A H-Bond Reported H15A .. S1 .. 2.91 Ang.
Alert level G PLAT794_ALERT_5_G Check Predicted Bond Valency for Mo1 (6) 6.11
0 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem 0 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem 7 ALERT level C = Check and explain 1 ALERT level G = General alerts; check 0 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 2 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 2 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 3 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion 1 ALERT type 5 Informative message, check

Comment top

As part of an ongoing research programme, we are investigating the synthesis and structural characterization of organic ammonium tetrathiometalates of the group VI metals Mo and W (Srinivasan, Naik et al., 2007). In earlier work we have structurally characterized several [MoS4]2- compounds derived from organic diamines (Srinivasan et al., 2001; Srinivasan, Dhuri et al., 2005; Srinivasan, Näther & Bensch, 2005), chiral amines (Srinivasan, Naik et al., 2007) triamines (Srinivasan, Dhuri et al., 2007), cyclic amines (Srinivasan, Näther & Bensch, 2006), tetraamine (Srinivasan et al., 2004) and primary amine (Srinivasan, Näther et al., 2006). All the organic ammonium tetrathiomolybdates exhibit several weak hydrogen bonding interactions between the organic cations and [MoS4]2- anions. We have also shown that in some organic [MoS4]2- compounds the organic amines are partially protonated (Srinivasan, Dhuri et al., 2007). The secondary amine N-methyl-1-phenylmethanamine used for the synthesis of the title compound (I) is an isomer of the chiral primary amine 1-phenylethanamine used in our earlier report (Srinivasan, Naik et al., 2007).

The structure of (I) consists of discrete tetrahedral [MoS4]2- ions and two crystallographically independent benzyl(methyl)ammonium cations (Fig. 1) with all atoms located in general positions. The [MoS4] tetrahedron is slightly distorted with S—Mo—S angles between 109.01 (6) and 110.28 (7)° (Table 1). The Mo—S bond lengths range from 2.1582 (13) to 2.1908 (14) Å with an average value of 2.1744 Å which is comparable to the bond lengths observed in the related chiral [MoS4]2- compound synthesized from the isomeric chiral primary amine (Srinivasan, Naik et al., 2007). The Mo1—S1 and Mo1—S2 bond distances are indistinguishable within experimental error as also the Mo1—S3 and Mo1—S4 bonds. The weak H-bonding interactions between the cations and anions can explain the observed short and long Mo—S bond distances. A scrutiny of the structure reveals that the organic cations and tetrathiomolybdate anions are linked with the aid of several N—H···S and C—H···S hydrogen bonding interactions. Thus each [MoS4]2- is hydrogen bonded to five different organic cations with the aid of six N—H···S bonds and two weak C—H···S interactions (Fig. 2). An examination of the surroundings of the cations reveals that one organic cation (N1) is H-bonded to two different [MoS4]2- ions while the second organic cation (N2) is surrounded by three different [MoS4]2- ions (Table 2). One H atom on each N atom functions as a singly shared donor with the other functioning as a bifurcated donor. A benzilic H atom from each unique cation is involved in C—H···S interaction. S4 atom which makes the longest Mo—S bond at 2.1908 (14) Å is involved in three N—H···S bonds, two of which are singly shared. S4 also makes the shortest singly shared N—H···S bond at 2.37 Å, which can explain the elongation of this bond. In contrast, S1 atom involved in the shortest Mo—S bond makes a bifurcated N—H···S bond at a longer S···H distance accompanied by a small NH—S angle. S1 also makes a very weak C—H···S contact. The observed difference Δ between the longest and the shortest Mo—S bond of 0.0326 Å in (I) is shorter than the Δ value of 0.0422 Å in the tetrathiomolybdate compound containing the R-form of the monoprotonated isomeric chiral primary amine 1-phenylethanamine (Srinivasan, Naik et al., 2007).

Related literature top

Previous reports give details of the structural characterization of several organic ammonium tetrathiomolybdates derived from organic diamines (Srinivasan et al., 2001; Srinivasan, Dhuri et al., 2005; Srinivasan, Näther & Bensch, 2005), chiral amines (Srinivasan, Naik et al., 2007), triamines (Srinivasan, Dhuri et al., 2007), cyclic amines (Srinivasan, Näther & Bensch, 2006), a tetraamine (Srinivasan et al., 2004) and a primary amine (Srinivasan, Näther et al., 2006).

Experimental top

(NH4)2[MoS4] (520 mg, 2 mmol) was dissolved in water (15 ml) containing a few drops of liquor ammonia. To this mixture N-methyl-1-phenylmethanamine (1 ml) was added and the reaction mixture filtered and left in the refrigerator for crystallization. After two days small needles of the title compound separated. The crystals were filtered, washed with ice-cold water (2 ml), followed by 2-propanol (10 ml) and diethyl ether (10 ml) and dried. Yield: 60%.

Refinement top

The H atoms were positioned with idealized geometry (C—H = 0.93 (aromatic), O.96 (methyl) and 0.97 (benzilic) Å and N—H = 0.90 Å) and were refined using a riding model, with Uiso(H) fixed at 1.5Ueq(CH3) and 1.2Ueq(NH2, benzilic, aromatic).

Structure description top

As part of an ongoing research programme, we are investigating the synthesis and structural characterization of organic ammonium tetrathiometalates of the group VI metals Mo and W (Srinivasan, Naik et al., 2007). In earlier work we have structurally characterized several [MoS4]2- compounds derived from organic diamines (Srinivasan et al., 2001; Srinivasan, Dhuri et al., 2005; Srinivasan, Näther & Bensch, 2005), chiral amines (Srinivasan, Naik et al., 2007) triamines (Srinivasan, Dhuri et al., 2007), cyclic amines (Srinivasan, Näther & Bensch, 2006), tetraamine (Srinivasan et al., 2004) and primary amine (Srinivasan, Näther et al., 2006). All the organic ammonium tetrathiomolybdates exhibit several weak hydrogen bonding interactions between the organic cations and [MoS4]2- anions. We have also shown that in some organic [MoS4]2- compounds the organic amines are partially protonated (Srinivasan, Dhuri et al., 2007). The secondary amine N-methyl-1-phenylmethanamine used for the synthesis of the title compound (I) is an isomer of the chiral primary amine 1-phenylethanamine used in our earlier report (Srinivasan, Naik et al., 2007).

The structure of (I) consists of discrete tetrahedral [MoS4]2- ions and two crystallographically independent benzyl(methyl)ammonium cations (Fig. 1) with all atoms located in general positions. The [MoS4] tetrahedron is slightly distorted with S—Mo—S angles between 109.01 (6) and 110.28 (7)° (Table 1). The Mo—S bond lengths range from 2.1582 (13) to 2.1908 (14) Å with an average value of 2.1744 Å which is comparable to the bond lengths observed in the related chiral [MoS4]2- compound synthesized from the isomeric chiral primary amine (Srinivasan, Naik et al., 2007). The Mo1—S1 and Mo1—S2 bond distances are indistinguishable within experimental error as also the Mo1—S3 and Mo1—S4 bonds. The weak H-bonding interactions between the cations and anions can explain the observed short and long Mo—S bond distances. A scrutiny of the structure reveals that the organic cations and tetrathiomolybdate anions are linked with the aid of several N—H···S and C—H···S hydrogen bonding interactions. Thus each [MoS4]2- is hydrogen bonded to five different organic cations with the aid of six N—H···S bonds and two weak C—H···S interactions (Fig. 2). An examination of the surroundings of the cations reveals that one organic cation (N1) is H-bonded to two different [MoS4]2- ions while the second organic cation (N2) is surrounded by three different [MoS4]2- ions (Table 2). One H atom on each N atom functions as a singly shared donor with the other functioning as a bifurcated donor. A benzilic H atom from each unique cation is involved in C—H···S interaction. S4 atom which makes the longest Mo—S bond at 2.1908 (14) Å is involved in three N—H···S bonds, two of which are singly shared. S4 also makes the shortest singly shared N—H···S bond at 2.37 Å, which can explain the elongation of this bond. In contrast, S1 atom involved in the shortest Mo—S bond makes a bifurcated N—H···S bond at a longer S···H distance accompanied by a small NH—S angle. S1 also makes a very weak C—H···S contact. The observed difference Δ between the longest and the shortest Mo—S bond of 0.0326 Å in (I) is shorter than the Δ value of 0.0422 Å in the tetrathiomolybdate compound containing the R-form of the monoprotonated isomeric chiral primary amine 1-phenylethanamine (Srinivasan, Naik et al., 2007).

Previous reports give details of the structural characterization of several organic ammonium tetrathiomolybdates derived from organic diamines (Srinivasan et al., 2001; Srinivasan, Dhuri et al., 2005; Srinivasan, Näther & Bensch, 2005), chiral amines (Srinivasan, Naik et al., 2007), triamines (Srinivasan, Dhuri et al., 2007), cyclic amines (Srinivasan, Näther & Bensch, 2006), a tetraamine (Srinivasan et al., 2004) and a primary amine (Srinivasan, Näther et al., 2006).

Computing details top

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2001); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2001); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2001); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2001); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2001); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg 1999); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2001).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The crystal structure of (I) showing the atom-labelling scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 30% probability level.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. A view of the surroundings of the [MoS4]2- anion showing its linking to five different organic cations with the aid of six N—H···S and two C—H···S interactions. N—H···S and C—H···S interactions are shown as dashed lines and dotted lines respectively. Symmetry codes: (i) x + 1, y, z (ii) -x + 1, -y + 1, -z + 1; (iii) -x, -y + 1, z - 1
Bis[benzyl(methyl)ammonium] tetrathiomolybdate(VI) top
Crystal data top
(C8H12N)2[MoS4]Z = 2
Mr = 468.55F(000) = 480
Triclinic, P1Dx = 1.480 Mg m3
Hall symbol: -P 1Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 7.1857 (12) ÅCell parameters from 4674 reflections
b = 10.7376 (18) Åθ = 2.9–25.9°
c = 14.881 (2) ŵ = 1.02 mm1
α = 110.811 (2)°T = 298 K
β = 90.608 (3)°Thin nedle, red
γ = 100.504 (3)°0.42 × 0.06 × 0.02 mm
V = 1051.7 (3) Å3
Data collection top
Bruker SMART APEX CCD
diffractometer
3639 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube3015 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.035
φ and ω scansθmax = 25.0°, θmin = 1.5°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 2004)
h = 88
Tmin = 0.901, Tmax = 0.976k = 1211
7363 measured reflectionsl = 1717
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.050Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.100H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.05 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0387P)2 + 0.9757P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
3639 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
210 parametersΔρmax = 0.68 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.51 e Å3
Crystal data top
(C8H12N)2[MoS4]γ = 100.504 (3)°
Mr = 468.55V = 1051.7 (3) Å3
Triclinic, P1Z = 2
a = 7.1857 (12) ÅMo Kα radiation
b = 10.7376 (18) ŵ = 1.02 mm1
c = 14.881 (2) ÅT = 298 K
α = 110.811 (2)°0.42 × 0.06 × 0.02 mm
β = 90.608 (3)°
Data collection top
Bruker SMART APEX CCD
diffractometer
3639 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 2004)
3015 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.901, Tmax = 0.976Rint = 0.035
7363 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0500 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.100H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.05Δρmax = 0.68 e Å3
3639 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.51 e Å3
210 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.5906 (7)0.4755 (6)0.1061 (3)0.0448 (13)
C20.7203 (8)0.4231 (7)0.0439 (4)0.0575 (15)
H20.82600.48160.03610.069*
C30.6971 (11)0.2869 (8)0.0068 (4)0.0714 (19)
H30.78540.25310.04930.086*
C40.5436 (12)0.2006 (7)0.0055 (5)0.077 (2)
H40.52790.10750.02830.092*
C50.4126 (10)0.2507 (7)0.0674 (5)0.075 (2)
H50.30750.19180.07530.090*
C60.4366 (8)0.3879 (7)0.1177 (4)0.0592 (16)
H60.34780.42170.16000.071*
C70.6150 (8)0.6270 (6)0.1585 (4)0.0510 (14)
H7A0.70900.67340.12870.061*
H7B0.49570.65450.15210.061*
C80.6958 (8)0.8155 (5)0.3161 (4)0.0573 (15)
H8A0.77180.86580.28290.086*
H8B0.75650.83720.37910.086*
H8C0.57280.83920.32230.086*
C90.1099 (7)0.1225 (5)0.2958 (4)0.0401 (12)
C100.0895 (8)0.0024 (6)0.2183 (4)0.0528 (14)
H100.14640.06690.22210.063*
C110.0153 (9)0.0155 (7)0.1348 (5)0.0677 (18)
H110.03230.09790.08310.081*
C120.0937 (9)0.0877 (7)0.1282 (4)0.0682 (18)
H120.16090.07650.07120.082*
C130.0739 (8)0.2073 (6)0.2050 (4)0.0583 (16)
H130.12850.27730.20060.070*
C140.0269 (8)0.2240 (5)0.2887 (4)0.0494 (14)
H140.03890.30520.34110.059*
C150.2213 (8)0.1417 (6)0.3879 (4)0.0511 (14)
H15A0.14150.16510.44120.061*
H15B0.25850.05710.38260.061*
C160.5316 (8)0.2289 (7)0.3349 (4)0.0640 (17)
H16A0.56540.14220.32240.096*
H16B0.64320.29940.35790.096*
H16C0.47670.23090.27640.096*
Mo10.16547 (6)0.66475 (4)0.38214 (3)0.03200 (14)
N10.6748 (6)0.6684 (4)0.2609 (3)0.0443 (10)
H1A0.78670.64410.26620.053*
H1B0.58920.62280.28750.053*
N20.3937 (6)0.2507 (5)0.4080 (3)0.0563 (13)
H2A0.35650.32910.41520.068*
H2B0.45290.26120.46450.068*
S10.10243 (18)0.57324 (14)0.41788 (10)0.0458 (3)
S20.2566 (2)0.86869 (15)0.48604 (12)0.0619 (4)
S30.1321 (2)0.66870 (17)0.23687 (10)0.0552 (4)
S40.37925 (19)0.54486 (14)0.38649 (10)0.0466 (3)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.045 (3)0.060 (4)0.033 (3)0.018 (3)0.001 (2)0.018 (3)
C20.056 (4)0.068 (4)0.051 (3)0.018 (3)0.006 (3)0.023 (3)
C30.087 (5)0.083 (5)0.050 (4)0.043 (4)0.008 (4)0.020 (4)
C40.118 (7)0.055 (4)0.058 (4)0.030 (5)0.016 (4)0.014 (4)
C50.080 (5)0.067 (5)0.064 (4)0.006 (4)0.009 (4)0.017 (4)
C60.051 (4)0.070 (5)0.049 (3)0.008 (3)0.008 (3)0.014 (3)
C70.052 (4)0.061 (4)0.047 (3)0.015 (3)0.001 (3)0.026 (3)
C80.058 (4)0.044 (4)0.065 (4)0.008 (3)0.010 (3)0.014 (3)
C90.034 (3)0.044 (3)0.043 (3)0.007 (2)0.008 (2)0.019 (3)
C100.052 (4)0.038 (3)0.065 (4)0.013 (3)0.005 (3)0.013 (3)
C110.069 (4)0.055 (4)0.056 (4)0.010 (3)0.004 (3)0.006 (3)
C120.061 (4)0.089 (5)0.049 (4)0.019 (4)0.008 (3)0.017 (4)
C130.046 (4)0.063 (4)0.073 (4)0.022 (3)0.003 (3)0.028 (4)
C140.047 (3)0.038 (3)0.056 (3)0.009 (3)0.002 (3)0.008 (3)
C150.058 (4)0.054 (4)0.045 (3)0.012 (3)0.007 (3)0.022 (3)
C160.041 (3)0.083 (5)0.070 (4)0.009 (3)0.004 (3)0.031 (4)
Mo10.0265 (2)0.0333 (3)0.0379 (2)0.00674 (17)0.00297 (17)0.01470 (19)
N10.041 (3)0.044 (3)0.047 (3)0.009 (2)0.002 (2)0.014 (2)
N20.051 (3)0.068 (3)0.046 (3)0.017 (3)0.005 (2)0.015 (2)
S10.0340 (7)0.0519 (9)0.0577 (8)0.0090 (6)0.0102 (6)0.0271 (7)
S20.0690 (11)0.0358 (8)0.0698 (10)0.0050 (8)0.0012 (8)0.0087 (8)
S30.0500 (9)0.0818 (12)0.0498 (8)0.0243 (8)0.0121 (7)0.0375 (8)
S40.0360 (8)0.0492 (9)0.0594 (9)0.0137 (6)0.0021 (6)0.0230 (7)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
C1—C21.371 (7)C10—H100.9300
C1—C61.372 (7)C11—C121.363 (9)
C1—C71.509 (7)C11—H110.9300
C2—C31.364 (8)C12—C131.365 (8)
C2—H20.9300C12—H120.9300
C3—C41.364 (9)C13—C141.372 (7)
C3—H30.9300C13—H130.9300
C4—C51.370 (9)C14—H140.9300
C4—H40.9300C15—N21.487 (7)
C5—C61.372 (8)C15—H15A0.9700
C5—H50.9300C15—H15B0.9700
C6—H60.9300C16—N21.465 (7)
C7—N11.463 (6)C16—H16A0.9600
C7—H7A0.9700C16—H16B0.9600
C7—H7B0.9700C16—H16C0.9600
C8—N11.477 (6)Mo1—S12.1582 (13)
C8—H8A0.9600Mo1—S22.1597 (16)
C8—H8B0.9600Mo1—S32.1888 (14)
C8—H8C0.9600Mo1—S42.1908 (14)
C9—C141.369 (7)N1—H1A0.9000
C9—C101.372 (7)N1—H1B0.9000
C9—C151.509 (7)N2—H2A0.9000
C10—C111.380 (8)N2—H2B0.9000
C2—C1—C6118.7 (6)C11—C12—C13120.2 (6)
C2—C1—C7120.4 (5)C11—C12—H12119.9
C6—C1—C7120.9 (5)C13—C12—H12119.9
C3—C2—C1121.3 (6)C12—C13—C14119.8 (6)
C3—C2—H2119.4C12—C13—H13120.1
C1—C2—H2119.4C14—C13—H13120.1
C4—C3—C2119.6 (6)C9—C14—C13120.7 (5)
C4—C3—H3120.2C9—C14—H14119.6
C2—C3—H3120.2C13—C14—H14119.6
C3—C4—C5120.1 (7)N2—C15—C9111.2 (4)
C3—C4—H4119.9N2—C15—H15A109.4
C5—C4—H4119.9C9—C15—H15A109.4
C4—C5—C6119.9 (7)N2—C15—H15B109.4
C4—C5—H5120.0C9—C15—H15B109.4
C6—C5—H5120.0H15A—C15—H15B108.0
C5—C6—C1120.4 (6)N2—C16—H16A109.5
C5—C6—H6119.8N2—C16—H16B109.5
C1—C6—H6119.8H16A—C16—H16B109.5
N1—C7—C1112.2 (4)N2—C16—H16C109.5
N1—C7—H7A109.2H16A—C16—H16C109.5
C1—C7—H7A109.2H16B—C16—H16C109.5
N1—C7—H7B109.2S1—Mo1—S2109.43 (6)
C1—C7—H7B109.2S1—Mo1—S3109.32 (6)
H7A—C7—H7B107.9S2—Mo1—S3110.28 (7)
N1—C8—H8A109.5S1—Mo1—S4109.47 (5)
N1—C8—H8B109.5S2—Mo1—S4109.01 (6)
H8A—C8—H8B109.5S3—Mo1—S4109.31 (6)
N1—C8—H8C109.5C7—N1—C8114.4 (4)
H8A—C8—H8C109.5C7—N1—H1A108.7
H8B—C8—H8C109.5C8—N1—H1A108.7
C14—C9—C10119.2 (5)C7—N1—H1B108.7
C14—C9—C15120.5 (5)C8—N1—H1B108.7
C10—C9—C15120.3 (5)H1A—N1—H1B107.6
C9—C10—C11120.1 (5)C16—N2—C15116.1 (5)
C9—C10—H10119.9C16—N2—H2A108.3
C11—C10—H10119.9C15—N2—H2A108.3
C12—C11—C10119.9 (6)C16—N2—H2B108.3
C12—C11—H11120.0C15—N2—H2B108.3
C10—C11—H11120.0H2A—N2—H2B107.4
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1A···S3i0.902.513.308 (4)149
N1—H1A···S1i0.902.783.358 (4)124
N1—H1B···S40.902.373.253 (4)168
N2—H2A···S40.902.483.305 (5)153
N2—H2B···S4ii0.902.543.264 (5)138
N2—H2B···S2ii0.902.933.602 (5)132
C7—H7B···S30.972.923.727 (6)141
C15—H15A···S1iii0.972.913.629 (6)132
Symmetry codes: (i) x+1, y, z; (ii) x+1, y+1, z+1; (iii) x, y+1, z+1.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula(C8H12N)2[MoS4]
Mr468.55
Crystal system, space groupTriclinic, P1
Temperature (K)298
a, b, c (Å)7.1857 (12), 10.7376 (18), 14.881 (2)
α, β, γ (°)110.811 (2), 90.608 (3), 100.504 (3)
V3)1051.7 (3)
Z2
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)1.02
Crystal size (mm)0.42 × 0.06 × 0.02
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker SMART APEX CCD
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 2004)
Tmin, Tmax0.901, 0.976
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
7363, 3639, 3015
Rint0.035
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.595
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.050, 0.100, 1.05
No. of reflections3639
No. of parameters210
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.68, 0.51

Computer programs: SMART (Bruker, 2001), SAINT (Bruker, 2001), SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2001), DIAMOND (Brandenburg 1999).

Selected geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Mo1—S12.1582 (13)Mo1—S32.1888 (14)
Mo1—S22.1597 (16)Mo1—S42.1908 (14)
S1—Mo1—S2109.43 (6)S1—Mo1—S4109.47 (5)
S1—Mo1—S3109.32 (6)S2—Mo1—S4109.01 (6)
S2—Mo1—S3110.28 (7)S3—Mo1—S4109.31 (6)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1A···S3i0.902.513.308 (4)149
N1—H1A···S1i0.902.783.358 (4)124
N1—H1B···S40.902.373.253 (4)168
N2—H2A···S40.902.483.305 (5)153
N2—H2B···S4ii0.902.543.264 (5)138
N2—H2B···S2ii0.902.933.602 (5)132
C7—H7B···S30.972.923.727 (6)141
C15—H15A···S1iii0.972.913.629 (6)132
Symmetry codes: (i) x+1, y, z; (ii) x+1, y+1, z+1; (iii) x, y+1, z+1.
 

Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds