Download citation
Download citation
link to html
The title mol­ecule, C6H8NO3P·H2O, has a zwitterionic structure. The crystal-packing properties are influenced by the presence of water mol­ecules in the crystal lattice and are stabilized by stacking interactions between pyridyl rings. Hydro­gen bonds link the mol­ecules in a three-dimensional network.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536802002155/na6137sup1.cif
Contains datablocks NA1556, I

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536802002155/na6137Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

CCDC reference: 182601

Key indicators

  • Single-crystal X-ray study
  • T = 293 K
  • Mean [sigma](C-C) = 0.004 Å
  • R factor = 0.052
  • wR factor = 0.146
  • Data-to-parameter ratio = 11.4

checkCIF results

No syntax errors found

ADDSYM reports no extra symmetry








Comment top

The investigation presented in this paper is part of systematic studies of organophosphorus derivatives of pyridine. Now we describe the crystal structure of 3-pyridylmethylphosphonic acid monohydrate, (I). In previous papers, the structures of 2-pyridylmethylphosphonic acid, (II) (Gałdecki & Wolf, 1990), and 4-pyridylmethylphosphonic acid monohydrate, (III) (Wolf et al., 1996), were reported. Knowledge of the structure of these compounds will help to design and synthesize new platinum(II) complexes of cytotoxic activity using them as ligands. Platinum(II) complexes of phosphonate ligands exhibit significant antitumour activity (Klenner et al., 1993; Bloemink et al., 1994).

The title molecule exists as a zwitterion. Negative charge is spread over the O2—P1—O3 fragment of the phosphonic group while the positive charge, formally located on the N atom, is delocalized on the pyridyl ring.

The most interesting feature of (I) is the significant difference between the P1—O2 and P1—O3 bond lengths, which is as large as 10σ, while the corresponding values in the previous reported structures, (II) and (III), are not significantly different, 1.500 (4) and 1.507 (3) Å, and 1.506 (2) and 1.5039 (14) Å, respectively. However, both mentioned values of bond distances P1—O2 and P1—O3 in (I) are contained within the range of the delocalized bond lengths 1.473–1.534 Å (mean value 1.501 Å) for aminophosphonic acids (Choi & McPartlin, 2000).

Analysis of the structural data indicates that the coordination around P atom is nearly tetrahedral, with the angles varying from 105.03 (10) to 116.84 (11)°.

Table 2 presents the hydrogen-bonding geometry and C—H···O interactions, with H···O contacts significantly less than the sum of the van der Waals radii (Taylor & Kennard, 1982).

The crystal-packing properties are influenced by presence of the water molecules in the crystal lattice. The solvent water molecule is a donor of two hydrogen bonds and is involved in two C—H···O interactions.

Considering the above P—O distances, it must be noticed that they correspond to three different environments (in order of decreasing bond distances): O1 is protonated and a donor in one O—H···O interaction; O2 is an acceptor in two (O—H···O and N—H···O) interactions; O3 is an acceptor in three (two O—H···O and one C—H···O) interactions.

Apart from the typical hydrogen bonds, aromatic ππ-stacking interactions between pyridyl rings are found. They additionally stabilize the molecular packing of (I). The distances between the centroids of the pyridyl rings are Cg1···Cg2(1 - x, 1 - y, 1 - z) = 3.738 (4) Å and Cg1···Cg3(-x, 1 - y, 1 - z) = 4.021 (4) Å. The perpendicular distances between the rings are 3.514 (4) and 3.459 (4) Å, respectively.

The conformation of the non-H skeleton of the title molecule is described by the torsion angles summarized in Table 1.

Experimental top

The title compound was synthesized in one step by the acidolysis of diethyl 3-pyridylmethylphosphonate with hydrobromic acid in acetic acid (Wasilewski et al., 1976; Ochocki et al., 1997) and was recrystallized from a water/ethanol mixture (1:1 by volume). The purity of the product was confirmed by 1H NMR analysis.

Refinement top

H atoms from pyridyl and methylidene groups, except H1, were geometrically placed and refined using a riding model with isotropic displacement parameters equal to 1.2Ueq of the attached C atom. H atoms, which are involved in the hydrogen bonds, were located from the difference map and refined isotropically. The H401 and H402 atoms of the solvent water molecule were refined with the O—H distance restrained to 0.95 (3) Å (Uiso = 1.5Ueq of atom O4).

Computing details top

Data collection: KM-4 Data Collection Program (Kuma, 1998); cell refinement: KM4 Data Collection Program; data reduction: DATAPROC (Kuma, 1996); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS86 (Sheldrick, 1990); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: ORTEX (McArdle, 1995); software used to prepare material for publication: PARST97 (Nardelli, 1996b).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The structure of the title compound with the atom-labeling scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 40% probability level.
3-pyridylmethylphosphonic acid monohydrate top
Crystal data top
C6H8NO3P·H2OF(000) = 400
Mr = 191.12Dx = 1.549 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/nCu Kα radiation, λ = 1.54178 Å
a = 7.0554 (7) ÅCell parameters from 24 reflections
b = 14.0106 (13) Åθ = 20.0–37.8°
c = 8.5228 (15) ŵ = 2.84 mm1
β = 103.444 (12)°T = 293 K
V = 819.40 (18) Å3Cylinder, colourless
Z = 40.15 mm (radius)
Data collection top
Kuma KM-4
diffractometer
1302 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tubeRint = 0.061
Graphite monochromatorθmax = 67.1°, θmin = 6.2°
ω scansh = 78
Absorption correction: for a cylinder mounted on the ϕ axis
(CYCLABS; Nardelli, 1996a)
k = 1616
Tmin = 0.491, Tmax = 0.527l = 010
2917 measured reflections3 standard reflections every 150 reflections
1410 independent reflections intensity decay: <3%
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Hydrogen site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.052 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.078P)2 + 0.3766P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
wR(F2) = 0.146(Δ/σ)max = 0.007
S = 1.11Δρmax = 0.44 e Å3
1410 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.42 e Å3
124 parametersExtinction correction: SHELXL97, Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
2 restraintsExtinction coefficient: 0.025 (2)
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Crystal data top
C6H8NO3P·H2OV = 819.40 (18) Å3
Mr = 191.12Z = 4
Monoclinic, P21/nCu Kα radiation
a = 7.0554 (7) ŵ = 2.84 mm1
b = 14.0106 (13) ÅT = 293 K
c = 8.5228 (15) Å0.15 mm (radius)
β = 103.444 (12)°
Data collection top
Kuma KM-4
diffractometer
1302 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Absorption correction: for a cylinder mounted on the ϕ axis
(CYCLABS; Nardelli, 1996a)
Rint = 0.061
Tmin = 0.491, Tmax = 0.5273 standard reflections every 150 reflections
2917 measured reflections intensity decay: <3%
1410 independent reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0522 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.146H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.11Δρmax = 0.44 e Å3
1410 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.42 e Å3
124 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
P10.20789 (9)0.28625 (4)0.87719 (7)0.0352 (4)
O10.0880 (3)0.21576 (12)0.7493 (2)0.0451 (6)
H110.006 (5)0.238 (3)0.691 (4)0.061 (11)*
O20.3056 (3)0.22375 (11)1.0179 (2)0.0449 (6)
O30.0871 (3)0.36656 (12)0.9132 (2)0.0505 (6)
C10.3987 (4)0.33214 (19)0.7905 (3)0.0456 (7)
H1010.48350.37220.86970.055*
H1020.47590.27900.76700.055*
C20.3281 (4)0.38905 (18)0.6388 (3)0.0369 (6)
C30.3093 (4)0.48717 (18)0.6441 (3)0.0389 (6)
H30.34270.51880.74260.047*
N10.2431 (3)0.53678 (15)0.5080 (2)0.0406 (6)
H10.239 (5)0.600 (3)0.519 (4)0.056 (9)*
C40.1930 (4)0.4961 (2)0.3627 (3)0.0444 (7)
H40.14580.53310.27130.053*
C50.2117 (4)0.3996 (2)0.3496 (3)0.0463 (7)
H50.17990.37030.24900.056*
C60.2785 (4)0.34601 (18)0.4876 (3)0.0427 (7)
H60.29040.28020.47930.051*
O40.2249 (4)0.55319 (19)0.9842 (3)0.0759 (8)
H4010.117 (6)0.587 (3)1.013 (6)0.114*
H4020.190 (7)0.487 (2)0.978 (6)0.114*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
P10.0428 (6)0.0281 (5)0.0314 (5)0.0006 (2)0.0016 (3)0.0014 (2)
O10.0513 (13)0.0342 (11)0.0417 (11)0.0025 (8)0.0057 (9)0.0005 (7)
O20.0562 (13)0.0340 (9)0.0367 (10)0.0037 (8)0.0053 (9)0.0066 (7)
O30.0627 (14)0.0397 (10)0.0495 (11)0.0107 (8)0.0138 (9)0.0029 (7)
C10.0408 (15)0.0431 (14)0.0490 (15)0.0009 (12)0.0026 (11)0.0070 (11)
C20.0340 (13)0.0356 (12)0.0421 (13)0.0006 (10)0.0110 (9)0.0026 (10)
C30.0440 (15)0.0348 (13)0.0403 (13)0.0029 (10)0.0145 (10)0.0033 (10)
N10.0473 (14)0.0318 (12)0.0452 (12)0.0004 (9)0.0160 (9)0.0032 (8)
C40.0485 (17)0.0458 (15)0.0393 (13)0.0001 (11)0.0113 (11)0.0062 (10)
C50.0545 (18)0.0467 (15)0.0380 (13)0.0050 (12)0.0115 (11)0.0063 (11)
C60.0456 (16)0.0345 (12)0.0492 (15)0.0004 (11)0.0137 (11)0.0040 (10)
O40.0752 (18)0.0786 (17)0.0845 (17)0.0270 (14)0.0403 (13)0.0273 (14)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
P1—O31.4860 (18)C3—H30.9300
P1—O21.5150 (17)N1—C41.334 (3)
P1—O11.5655 (18)N1—H10.89 (3)
P1—C11.799 (3)C4—C51.366 (4)
O1—H110.74 (3)C4—H40.9300
C1—C21.502 (3)C5—C61.383 (4)
C1—H1010.9700C5—H50.9300
C1—H1020.9700C6—H60.9300
C2—C31.383 (4)O4—H4010.97 (3)
C2—C61.392 (3)O4—H4020.95 (3)
C3—N11.340 (3)
O3—P1—O2116.84 (11)N1—C3—C2120.2 (2)
O3—P1—O1112.23 (12)N1—C3—H3119.9
O2—P1—O1105.03 (10)C2—C3—H3119.9
O3—P1—C1109.52 (12)C4—N1—C3123.1 (2)
O2—P1—C1106.60 (12)C4—N1—H1121 (2)
O1—P1—C1105.92 (12)C3—N1—H1116 (2)
P1—O1—H11115 (3)N1—C4—C5119.3 (2)
C2—C1—P1114.42 (17)N1—C4—H4120.4
C2—C1—H101108.7C5—C4—H4120.4
P1—C1—H101108.7C4—C5—C6119.2 (2)
C2—C1—H102108.7C4—C5—H5120.4
P1—C1—H102108.7C6—C5—H5120.4
H101—C1—H102107.6C5—C6—C2121.0 (2)
C3—C2—C6117.1 (2)C5—C6—H6119.5
C3—C2—C1121.0 (2)C2—C6—H6119.5
C6—C2—C1121.9 (2)H401—O4—H402106 (4)
O3—P1—C1—C258.1 (2)C2—C3—N1—C40.2 (4)
O2—P1—C1—C2174.66 (18)C3—N1—C4—C51.0 (4)
O1—P1—C1—C263.2 (2)N1—C4—C5—C61.3 (4)
P1—C1—C2—C393.1 (3)C4—C5—C6—C20.5 (4)
P1—C1—C2—C686.7 (3)C3—C2—C6—C50.6 (4)
C6—C2—C3—N10.9 (4)C1—C2—C6—C5179.3 (2)
C1—C2—C3—N1178.9 (2)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1—H11···O2i0.74 (3)1.87 (3)2.598 (3)170 (4)
N1—H1···O2ii0.89 (3)1.78 (3)2.644 (3)163 (3)
O4—H401···O3iii0.97 (3)1.82 (4)2.787 (4)171 (4)
O4—H402···O30.95 (3)1.87 (3)2.806 (3)166 (3)
C3—H3···O40.932.443.227 (4)142
C1—H101···O4iv0.972.383.309 (4)159
C4—H4···O3v0.932.443.313 (3)156
Symmetry codes: (i) x1/2, y+1/2, z1/2; (ii) x+1/2, y+1/2, z+3/2; (iii) x, y+1, z+2; (iv) x+1, y+1, z+2; (v) x, y+1, z+1.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC6H8NO3P·H2O
Mr191.12
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/n
Temperature (K)293
a, b, c (Å)7.0554 (7), 14.0106 (13), 8.5228 (15)
β (°) 103.444 (12)
V3)819.40 (18)
Z4
Radiation typeCu Kα
µ (mm1)2.84
Crystal size (mm)0.15 (radius)
Data collection
DiffractometerKuma KM-4
diffractometer
Absorption correctionFor a cylinder mounted on the ϕ axis
(CYCLABS; Nardelli, 1996a)
Tmin, Tmax0.491, 0.527
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
2917, 1410, 1302
Rint0.061
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.598
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.052, 0.146, 1.11
No. of reflections1410
No. of parameters124
No. of restraints2
H-atom treatmentH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.44, 0.42

Computer programs: KM-4 Data Collection Program (Kuma, 1998), KM4 Data Collection Program, DATAPROC (Kuma, 1996), SHELXS86 (Sheldrick, 1990), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), ORTEX (McArdle, 1995), PARST97 (Nardelli, 1996b).

Selected geometric parameters (Å, º) top
P1—O31.4860 (18)C2—C61.392 (3)
P1—O21.5150 (17)C3—N11.340 (3)
P1—O11.5655 (18)N1—C41.334 (3)
P1—C11.799 (3)C4—C51.366 (4)
C1—C21.502 (3)C5—C61.383 (4)
C2—C31.383 (4)
O3—P1—O2116.84 (11)O2—P1—C1106.60 (12)
O3—P1—O1112.23 (12)O1—P1—C1105.92 (12)
O2—P1—O1105.03 (10)C2—C1—P1114.42 (17)
O3—P1—C1109.52 (12)
O3—P1—C1—C258.1 (2)P1—C1—C2—C393.1 (3)
O2—P1—C1—C2174.66 (18)P1—C1—C2—C686.7 (3)
O1—P1—C1—C263.2 (2)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1—H11···O2i0.74 (3)1.87 (3)2.598 (3)170 (4)
N1—H1···O2ii0.89 (3)1.78 (3)2.644 (3)163 (3)
O4—H401···O3iii0.97 (3)1.82 (4)2.787 (4)171 (4)
O4—H402···O30.95 (3)1.87 (3)2.806 (3)166 (3)
C3—H3···O40.932.443.227 (4)142
C1—H101···O4iv0.972.383.309 (4)159
C4—H4···O3v0.932.443.313 (3)156
Symmetry codes: (i) x1/2, y+1/2, z1/2; (ii) x+1/2, y+1/2, z+3/2; (iii) x, y+1, z+2; (iv) x+1, y+1, z+2; (v) x, y+1, z+1.
 

Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds