metal-organic compounds\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Volume 70| Part 2| February 2014| Pages m76-m77

μ-Cyanido-κ2C:N-dicyanido-κ2C-bis­­(N-ethyl­ethylenedi­amine-κ2N,N′)copper(II)copper(I)

aDepartment of Chemistry, Fordham University, 441 East Fordham Road, Bronx, NY 10458, USA
*Correspondence e-mail: pcorfield@fordham.edu

(Received 23 December 2013; accepted 23 January 2014; online 31 January 2014)

In the title complex, [CuICuII(CN)3(C4H12N2)2], the CuI and CuII ions and a bridging cyanide group lie on a twofold rotation axis. The CuII ion is in a slightly-distorted square-pyramidal coordination environment, with the N atoms of the two symmetry-related N-ethyl­ethylenedi­amine ligands occupying the basal positions and an N-bonded cyanide group in the apical position. The CuI ion is in a trigonal-planar coordination environment, bonded to the C atom of the bridging cyanide group and to two terminal cyanide groups. In the crystal, N—H⋯N hydrogen bonds involving two of the symmetry-unique N—H groups of the N-ethyl­ethylenedi­amine ligands and the N atoms of the terminal cyanide ligands link the mol­ecules into strands along [010].

Related literature

The title compound was synthesized as part of our continuing study of structural motifs in mixed-valence copper cyanide complexes containing amine ligands. For descriptions of similar discrete mol­ecular copper cyanide complexes, see: Corfield et al. (2012[Corfield, P. W. R., Grillo, S. A. & Umstott, N. S. (2012). Acta Cryst. E68, m1532-m1533.]); Pretsch et al. (2005[Pretsch, T., Ostmann, J., Donner, C., Nahorska, M., Mrozinski, J. & Hartl, H. (2005). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 358, 2558-2564.]); Pickardt et al. (1999[Pickardt, J., Staub, B. & Schafer, K. O. (1999). Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 625, 1217-1224.]); Yuge et al. (1998[Yuge, H., Soma, T. & Miyamoto, T. K. (1998). Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. 63, 622-627.]). For mixed-valence copper cyanide complexes crystallizing as self-assembled polymeric networks, from preparations similar to those used in the present work, see: Williams et al. (1972[Williams, R. J., Larson, A. C. & Cromer, D. T. (1972). Acta Cryst. B28, 858-864.]); Colacio et al. (2002[Colacio, E., Kivekas, R., Lloret, F., Sunberg, M., Suarez-Varela, J., Bardaji, M. & Laguna, A. (2002). Inorg. Chem. 47, 5141-5149.]); Kim et al. (2005[Kim, D., Koo, J., Hong, C. S., Oh, S. & Do, Y. (2005). Inorg. Chem. 44, 4383-4390.]), and also Corfield & Yang (2012[Corfield, P. W. R. & Yang, S. C. (2012). Acta Cryst. E68, m872-m873.]), although this last one involves only CuII ions.

[Scheme 1]

Experimental

Crystal data
  • [Cu2(CN)3(C4H12N2)2]

  • Mr = 381.45

  • Monoclinic, C 2/c

  • a = 11.425 (1) Å

  • b = 9.679 (2) Å

  • c = 15.205 (3) Å

  • β = 91.52 (1)°

  • V = 1680.8 (5) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 2.53 mm−1

  • T = 301 K

  • 0.33 × 0.30 × 0.30 mm

Data collection
  • Enraf–Nonius CAD-4 diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: integration (Busing & Levy, 1957[Busing, W. R. & Levy, H. A. (1957). Acta Cryst. 10, 180-182.]) Tmin = 0.529, Tmax = 0.587

  • 3737 measured reflections

  • 1835 independent reflections

  • 1674 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • Rint = 0.020

  • 3 standard reflections every 120 min intensity decay: 2.3 (6)%

Refinement
  • R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.020

  • wR(F2) = 0.062

  • S = 1.06

  • 1835 reflections

  • 103 parameters

  • H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement

  • Δρmax = 0.22 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.25 e Å−3

Table 1
Selected bond lengths (Å)

Cu1—C1 1.931 (3)
Cu1—C2 1.9406 (18)
Cu2—N3 2.0403 (14)
Cu2—N6 2.0456 (14)
Cu2—N1 2.142 (2)
C1—N1 1.139 (4)
C2—N2 1.136 (2)

Table 2
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N3—H3B⋯N2i 0.79 (2) 2.49 (2) 3.181 (2) 147 (2)
N6—H6⋯N2ii 0.81 (2) 2.34 (2) 3.112 (2) 160.9 (17)
Symmetry codes: (i) [-x+1, y+1, -z+{\script{1\over 2}}]; (ii) x, y+1, z.

Data collection: CAD-4 Software (Enraf–Nonius, 1994)[Enraf-Nonius (1994). CAD-4 Software. Enraf-Nonius, Delft, The Netherlands.]; cell refinement: CAD-4 Software; data reduction: data reduction followed procedures in Corfield et al. (1973[Corfield, P. W. R., Dabrowiak, J. C. & Gore, E. S. (1973). Inorg. Chem. 12, 1734-1740.]); data were averaged with a local version of SORTAV (Blessing, 1989[Blessing, R. H. (1989). J. Appl. Cryst. 22, 396-397.]); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); molecular graphics: ORTEPIII (Burnett & Johnson, 1996[Burnett, M. N. & Johnson, C. K. (1996). ORTEPIII. Report ORNL-6895. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Tennessee, USA.]); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.

Supporting information


Results and discussion top

The structure determination of the title compound was undertaken as part of a continuing study of mixed-valence copper cyanide complexes containing amine ligands, with the goal of learning how to direct synthesis of specific polymeric structures. In these compounds, the divalent copper atoms are stabilized by the coordinated amines against reduction by the cyanide groups. In the present work, the synthesis involved the bidentate base N-ethyl­ethylenedi­amine (eten), under conditions expected to produce a polymeric structure, as in Williams et al. (1972) or Colacio et al. (2002). The crystal structure is made up of discrete molecules, as shown in Fig. 1, with terminal cyanide groups that are not involved in covalent polymeric linkages, and is similar to structures previously reported by us (Corfield et al., 2012) or by others (Yuge et al., 1998; Pickardt et al., 1999; Pretsch et al., 2005). The packing of the molecules is shown in Fig. 2. Inter­molecular contacts appear normal.

The binuclear molecules lie on the two-fold axes of space group C2/c, with the asymmetric unit at 1/2,y,1/4. The divalent copper atom, Cu2, shows square-pyramidal coordination, with the four N atoms of the two symmetry-related eten ligands occupying the basal positions, and the N atom of the cyanide group on the two-fold axis in the apical position. The bond length to the apical N atom shows a slight Jahn-Teller extension of 0.10 Å relative to the basal positions (Table 1). The four eten N atoms are roughly co-planar, and the Cu2 atom lies 0.360 (1)Å out of their best plane, in the direction of the apical N atom. The N—C—C—N torsion angle is -54.6 (2)° for each symmetry related chelate ring, giving the ring the λ conformation.

The monovalent copper atom, Cu1, shows trigonal planar coordination to the carbon atoms of the bridging and two terminal cyanide groups, with bond angles C1—Cu1—C2 = 121.33 (5)° and C2—Cu1—C2(1-x,y,1/2-z) = 117.33 (10)°, and Cu1 exactly coplanar with the three cyanide carbon atoms.

The bridging and terminal C—N bond lengths are not significantly different. The bridging C—N group is linearly bonded to the two copper atoms, with the angles Cu1—C—N and C—N—Cu2 both required to be 180° by symmetry. This geometry differs from that found in the one-dimensional polymer [Cu(dien)CN]+, (Corfield & Yang, 2012) where both copper atoms are divalent, and the C—N—Cu angle is non-linear at 146.5 (2)°. The Jahn-Teller lengthening of the axial Cu—N distance is greater in the polymer, with Cu—N = 2.340 (3) Å versus 2.127 (4) Å in the present structure.

Two symmetry-unique hydrogen bonds link N—H groups from the eten ligand and nitro­gen atoms of terminal cyanide groups from molecules related by translation along the b axis. They are shown in Fig. 3, and details are given in table 2.

Experimental top

Synthesis and crystallization top

The compound was prepared by dissolution of 56 mmol of copper(I) cyanide, CuCN, in 30 mL of a solution containing 90 mmol of sodium cyanide, NaCN. To this were added 10 mL of a solution containing 71 mmol of N-ethyl­ethylenedi­amine. Slow evaporation of the deep blue mixture resulted after two days in a yield of 1.87 g of Cu2(eten)2(CN)3 in the form of deep blue thin plates that were often several mm long. The yield for this first batch was 18%, based upon copper.

Total copper was measured iodo­metrically: calculated 33.33%; found 33.23 (4)%, based upon three measurements. The infra-red spectrum, obtained with a Buck Model 530 transmission ir spectrometer, showed two strong CN stretching frequencies at 2,092 cm-1 and 2,133 cm-1.

Refinement top

In the final refinement cycle, the two NH atoms involved in hydrogen bonding were allowed to refine freely. However, atom H3A on N3, which is not involved in hydrogen bonding, was constrained to an ideal position by using a dummy H3B with zero occupancy factor. This dummy atom has been removed from the final coordinates and geometry tables. N—H distances for the refined H atoms were 0.79 (2) and 0.81 (2)Å, shorter than the 0.90Å constrained N—H distance.

Related literature top

The title compound was synthesized as part of our continuing study of structural motifs in mixed-valence copper cyanide complexes containing amine ligands. For descriptions of similar discrete molecular copper cyanide complexes, see: Corfield et al. (2012); Pretsch et al. (2005); Pickardt et al. (1999); Yuge et al. (1998). For mixed-valence copper cyanide complexes crystallizing as self-assembled polymeric networks, from preparations similar to those used in the present work, see: Williams et al. (1972); Colacio et al. (2002); Kim et al. (2005), and also Corfield & Yang (2012), although this last involves only CuII ions.

Structure description top

The structure determination of the title compound was undertaken as part of a continuing study of mixed-valence copper cyanide complexes containing amine ligands, with the goal of learning how to direct synthesis of specific polymeric structures. In these compounds, the divalent copper atoms are stabilized by the coordinated amines against reduction by the cyanide groups. In the present work, the synthesis involved the bidentate base N-ethyl­ethylenedi­amine (eten), under conditions expected to produce a polymeric structure, as in Williams et al. (1972) or Colacio et al. (2002). The crystal structure is made up of discrete molecules, as shown in Fig. 1, with terminal cyanide groups that are not involved in covalent polymeric linkages, and is similar to structures previously reported by us (Corfield et al., 2012) or by others (Yuge et al., 1998; Pickardt et al., 1999; Pretsch et al., 2005). The packing of the molecules is shown in Fig. 2. Inter­molecular contacts appear normal.

The binuclear molecules lie on the two-fold axes of space group C2/c, with the asymmetric unit at 1/2,y,1/4. The divalent copper atom, Cu2, shows square-pyramidal coordination, with the four N atoms of the two symmetry-related eten ligands occupying the basal positions, and the N atom of the cyanide group on the two-fold axis in the apical position. The bond length to the apical N atom shows a slight Jahn-Teller extension of 0.10 Å relative to the basal positions (Table 1). The four eten N atoms are roughly co-planar, and the Cu2 atom lies 0.360 (1)Å out of their best plane, in the direction of the apical N atom. The N—C—C—N torsion angle is -54.6 (2)° for each symmetry related chelate ring, giving the ring the λ conformation.

The monovalent copper atom, Cu1, shows trigonal planar coordination to the carbon atoms of the bridging and two terminal cyanide groups, with bond angles C1—Cu1—C2 = 121.33 (5)° and C2—Cu1—C2(1-x,y,1/2-z) = 117.33 (10)°, and Cu1 exactly coplanar with the three cyanide carbon atoms.

The bridging and terminal C—N bond lengths are not significantly different. The bridging C—N group is linearly bonded to the two copper atoms, with the angles Cu1—C—N and C—N—Cu2 both required to be 180° by symmetry. This geometry differs from that found in the one-dimensional polymer [Cu(dien)CN]+, (Corfield & Yang, 2012) where both copper atoms are divalent, and the C—N—Cu angle is non-linear at 146.5 (2)°. The Jahn-Teller lengthening of the axial Cu—N distance is greater in the polymer, with Cu—N = 2.340 (3) Å versus 2.127 (4) Å in the present structure.

Two symmetry-unique hydrogen bonds link N—H groups from the eten ligand and nitro­gen atoms of terminal cyanide groups from molecules related by translation along the b axis. They are shown in Fig. 3, and details are given in table 2.

The title compound was synthesized as part of our continuing study of structural motifs in mixed-valence copper cyanide complexes containing amine ligands. For descriptions of similar discrete molecular copper cyanide complexes, see: Corfield et al. (2012); Pretsch et al. (2005); Pickardt et al. (1999); Yuge et al. (1998). For mixed-valence copper cyanide complexes crystallizing as self-assembled polymeric networks, from preparations similar to those used in the present work, see: Williams et al. (1972); Colacio et al. (2002); Kim et al. (2005), and also Corfield & Yang (2012), although this last involves only CuII ions.

Synthesis and crystallization top

The compound was prepared by dissolution of 56 mmol of copper(I) cyanide, CuCN, in 30 mL of a solution containing 90 mmol of sodium cyanide, NaCN. To this were added 10 mL of a solution containing 71 mmol of N-ethyl­ethylenedi­amine. Slow evaporation of the deep blue mixture resulted after two days in a yield of 1.87 g of Cu2(eten)2(CN)3 in the form of deep blue thin plates that were often several mm long. The yield for this first batch was 18%, based upon copper.

Total copper was measured iodo­metrically: calculated 33.33%; found 33.23 (4)%, based upon three measurements. The infra-red spectrum, obtained with a Buck Model 530 transmission ir spectrometer, showed two strong CN stretching frequencies at 2,092 cm-1 and 2,133 cm-1.

Refinement details top

In the final refinement cycle, the two NH atoms involved in hydrogen bonding were allowed to refine freely. However, atom H3A on N3, which is not involved in hydrogen bonding, was constrained to an ideal position by using a dummy H3B with zero occupancy factor. This dummy atom has been removed from the final coordinates and geometry tables. N—H distances for the refined H atoms were 0.79 (2) and 0.81 (2)Å, shorter than the 0.90Å constrained N—H distance.

Computing details top

Data collection: CAD-4 Software (Enraf–Nonius, 1994); cell refinement: CAD-4 Software (Enraf–Nonius, 1994); data reduction: data reduction followed procedures in Corfield et al. (1973); data were averaged with a local version of SORTAV (Blessing, 1989); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ORTEPIII (Burnett & Johnson, 1996); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The molecular structure of the title molecule, with ellipsoids at the 50% level. Atoms with the same labels are related by the two- fold axis at 1/2, y, 1/4.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. Packing of the title complex, viewed along the b axis. Ellipsoid outlines at 30% probability.
[Figure 3] Fig. 3. View of the title complex perpendicular to the crystallographic twofold axis, indicating molecules connected by hydrogen bonds, which are shown as dashed lines. Ellipsoids at 50% probability.
µ-Cyanido-κ2C:N-dicyanido-κ2C-bis(N-ethylethylenediamine-κ2N,N')copper(II)copper(I) top
Crystal data top
[Cu2(CN)3(C4H12N2)2]F(000) = 788
Mr = 381.45Dx = 1.507 Mg m3
Dm = 1.497 (2) Mg m3
Dm measured by Flotation in 1,2-dibromopropane/toluene mixtures. Four independent determinations were made. The observed density measurements were systematically 0.7% low, perhaps due to the presence of occlusions in crystals that were large enough to use for density measurements.
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71070 Å
a = 11.425 (1) ÅCell parameters from 25 reflections
b = 9.679 (2) Åθ = 5.0–19.1°
c = 15.205 (3) ŵ = 2.53 mm1
β = 91.52 (1)°T = 301 K
V = 1680.8 (5) Å3Block, dark blue
Z = 40.33 × 0.30 × 0.30 mm
Data collection top
Enraf–Nonius CAD-4
diffractometer
1674 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tubeRint = 0.020
Graphite monochromatorθmax = 27.0°, θmin = 2.7°
θ/2θ scansh = 1414
Absorption correction: integration
(Busing & Levy, 1957)
k = 112
Tmin = 0.529, Tmax = 0.587l = 1919
3737 measured reflections3 standard reflections every 120 min
1835 independent reflections intensity decay: 2.3(6)
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.020H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.062 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.P)2 + 0.250P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.06(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
1835 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.22 e Å3
103 parametersΔρmin = 0.25 e Å3
0 restraintsExtinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction coefficient: 0.0078 (4)
Crystal data top
[Cu2(CN)3(C4H12N2)2]V = 1680.8 (5) Å3
Mr = 381.45Z = 4
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation
a = 11.425 (1) ŵ = 2.53 mm1
b = 9.679 (2) ÅT = 301 K
c = 15.205 (3) Å0.33 × 0.30 × 0.30 mm
β = 91.52 (1)°
Data collection top
Enraf–Nonius CAD-4
diffractometer
1674 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Absorption correction: integration
(Busing & Levy, 1957)
Rint = 0.020
Tmin = 0.529, Tmax = 0.5873 standard reflections every 120 min
3737 measured reflections intensity decay: 2.3(6)
1835 independent reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0200 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.062H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.06Δρmax = 0.22 e Å3
1835 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.25 e Å3
103 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Cu10.50000.29790 (3)0.25000.04340 (12)
Cu20.50000.24064 (2)0.25000.03031 (11)
C10.50000.0984 (3)0.25000.0443 (5)
N10.50000.0193 (2)0.25000.0501 (5)
C20.39932 (15)0.40213 (16)0.32653 (12)0.0440 (4)
N20.34282 (16)0.46675 (16)0.37112 (13)0.0575 (5)
N30.67206 (12)0.29094 (15)0.27009 (10)0.0403 (3)
H3A0.71700.21490.26620.048*
H3B0.697 (2)0.341 (2)0.2337 (15)0.061 (7)*
C40.68534 (15)0.35226 (19)0.35844 (12)0.0473 (4)
H4A0.65900.44750.35740.071*
H4B0.76690.35050.37780.071*
C50.61299 (16)0.2693 (2)0.41977 (11)0.0472 (4)
H5A0.64430.17650.42540.071*
H5B0.61420.31170.47760.071*
N60.49168 (12)0.26432 (15)0.38337 (9)0.0364 (3)
H60.4663 (16)0.342 (2)0.3875 (12)0.037 (5)*
C70.41570 (17)0.1642 (2)0.42882 (12)0.0498 (4)
H7A0.44910.07260.42320.075*
H7B0.33940.16330.39930.075*
C80.3996 (2)0.1943 (3)0.52557 (13)0.0670 (6)
H8A0.47270.18140.55710.101*
H8B0.34200.13260.54840.101*
H8C0.37380.28800.53250.101*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cu10.05315 (19)0.02439 (17)0.05233 (19)0.0000.00472 (13)0.000
Cu20.03423 (15)0.02483 (16)0.03163 (15)0.0000.00377 (10)0.000
C10.0654 (15)0.0304 (12)0.0371 (11)0.0000.0031 (10)0.000
N10.0788 (16)0.0256 (10)0.0459 (12)0.0000.0021 (11)0.000
C20.0481 (9)0.0245 (7)0.0590 (10)0.0064 (6)0.0022 (8)0.0026 (7)
N20.0607 (10)0.0387 (9)0.0736 (12)0.0045 (7)0.0129 (9)0.0000 (7)
N30.0357 (7)0.0411 (8)0.0437 (8)0.0017 (5)0.0054 (6)0.0045 (6)
C40.0412 (8)0.0456 (10)0.0543 (10)0.0025 (7)0.0134 (7)0.0085 (7)
C50.0468 (10)0.0560 (10)0.0381 (8)0.0080 (8)0.0121 (7)0.0049 (7)
N60.0409 (7)0.0319 (7)0.0361 (7)0.0072 (5)0.0033 (5)0.0012 (5)
C70.0598 (11)0.0481 (10)0.0418 (9)0.0038 (8)0.0055 (8)0.0033 (8)
C80.0762 (14)0.0834 (17)0.0418 (11)0.0022 (12)0.0074 (10)0.0042 (10)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Cu1—C11.931 (3)C4—H4A0.9700
Cu1—C2i1.9406 (18)C4—H4B0.9700
Cu1—C21.9406 (18)C5—N61.479 (2)
Cu2—N32.0403 (14)C5—H5A0.9700
Cu2—N3i2.0403 (14)C5—H5B0.9700
Cu2—N62.0456 (14)N6—C71.484 (2)
Cu2—N6i2.0456 (14)N6—H60.81 (2)
Cu2—N12.142 (2)C7—C81.516 (3)
C1—N11.139 (4)C7—H7A0.9700
C2—N21.136 (2)C7—H7B0.9700
N3—C41.473 (2)C8—H8A0.9600
N3—H3A0.9000C8—H8B0.9600
N3—H3B0.79 (2)C8—H8C0.9600
C4—C51.496 (3)
C1—Cu1—C2i121.32 (5)C5—C4—H4B110.1
C1—Cu1—C2121.32 (5)H4A—C4—H4B108.4
C2i—Cu1—C2117.35 (9)N6—C5—C4108.17 (14)
N3—Cu2—N3i152.39 (8)N6—C5—H5A110.1
N3—Cu2—N683.96 (6)C4—C5—H5A110.1
N3i—Cu2—N692.97 (6)N6—C5—H5B110.1
N3—Cu2—N6i92.97 (6)C4—C5—H5B110.1
N3i—Cu2—N6i83.96 (6)H5A—C5—H5B108.4
N6—Cu2—N6i167.13 (8)C5—N6—C7113.62 (14)
N3—Cu2—N1103.81 (4)C5—N6—Cu2107.86 (10)
N3i—Cu2—N1103.81 (4)C7—N6—Cu2115.57 (11)
N6—Cu2—N196.43 (4)C5—N6—H6106.0 (13)
N6i—Cu2—N196.43 (4)C7—N6—H6110.8 (13)
N1—C1—Cu1180.0Cu2—N6—H6102.0 (13)
C1—N1—Cu2180.0N6—C7—C8114.45 (17)
N2—C2—Cu1177.74 (15)N6—C7—H7A108.6
C4—N3—Cu2107.96 (10)C8—C7—H7A108.6
C4—N3—H3A110.1N6—C7—H7B108.6
Cu2—N3—H3A110.1C8—C7—H7B108.6
C4—N3—H3B111.2 (17)H7A—C7—H7B107.6
Cu2—N3—H3B114.1 (18)C7—C8—H8A109.5
H3A—N3—H3B103.4C7—C8—H8B109.5
N3—C4—C5107.87 (14)H8A—C8—H8B109.5
N3—C4—H4A110.1C7—C8—H8C109.5
C5—C4—H4A110.1H8A—C8—H8C109.5
N3—C4—H4B110.1H8B—C8—H8C109.5
N3—C4—C5—N654.69 (18)C5—N6—C7—C861.5 (2)
Symmetry code: (i) x+1, y, z+1/2.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N3—H3B···N2ii0.79 (2)2.49 (2)3.181 (2)147 (2)
N6—H6···N2iii0.81 (2)2.34 (2)3.112 (2)160.9 (17)
Symmetry codes: (ii) x+1, y+1, z+1/2; (iii) x, y+1, z.
Selected bond lengths (Å) top
Cu1—C11.931 (3)Cu2—N12.142 (2)
Cu1—C21.9406 (18)C1—N11.139 (4)
Cu2—N32.0403 (14)C2—N21.136 (2)
Cu2—N62.0456 (14)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N3—H3B···N2i0.79 (2)2.49 (2)3.181 (2)147 (2)
N6—H6···N2ii0.81 (2)2.34 (2)3.112 (2)160.9 (17)
Symmetry codes: (i) x+1, y+1, z+1/2; (ii) x, y+1, z.
 

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the Office of the Dean at Fordham University for its generous financial support. We thank Fordham University students Michael A. Chernichaw, Emma M. Cleary and Julie H. Thoubboron for assistance with this work.

References

First citationBlessing, R. H. (1989). J. Appl. Cryst. 22, 396–397.  CrossRef Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationBurnett, M. N. & Johnson, C. K. (1996). ORTEPIII. Report ORNL-6895. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Tennessee, USA.  Google Scholar
First citationBusing, W. R. & Levy, H. A. (1957). Acta Cryst. 10, 180–182.  CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationColacio, E., Kivekas, R., Lloret, F., Sunberg, M., Suarez-Varela, J., Bardaji, M. & Laguna, A. (2002). Inorg. Chem. 47, 5141–5149.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef Google Scholar
First citationCorfield, P. W. R., Dabrowiak, J. C. & Gore, E. S. (1973). Inorg. Chem. 12, 1734–1740.  CSD CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationCorfield, P. W. R., Grillo, S. A. & Umstott, N. S. (2012). Acta Cryst. E68, m1532–m1533.  CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationCorfield, P. W. R. & Yang, S. C. (2012). Acta Cryst. E68, m872–m873.  CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationEnraf–Nonius (1994). CAD-4 Software. Enraf–Nonius, Delft, The Netherlands.  Google Scholar
First citationKim, D., Koo, J., Hong, C. S., Oh, S. & Do, Y. (2005). Inorg. Chem. 44, 4383–4390.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationPickardt, J., Staub, B. & Schafer, K. O. (1999). Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 625, 1217–1224.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationPretsch, T., Ostmann, J., Donner, C., Nahorska, M., Mrozinski, J. & Hartl, H. (2005). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 358, 2558–2564.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationWilliams, R. J., Larson, A. C. & Cromer, D. T. (1972). Acta Cryst. B28, 858–864.  CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationYuge, H., Soma, T. & Miyamoto, T. K. (1998). Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. 63, 622–627.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Volume 70| Part 2| February 2014| Pages m76-m77
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds