Download citation
Download citation
link to html
Single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis of poly[bis­(μ2-5-carb­oxy-2-propyl-1H-imidazole-4-carboxyl­ato-κ3N3,O4:O5)copper(II)], [Cu(C8H9N2O4)2)]n, indicates that one carb­oxy­lic acid group of the 2-propyl-1H-imidazole-4,5-di­carb­oxy­lic acid (H3PDI) ligand is deprotonated. The resulting H2PDI anion, acting as a bridge, connects the CuII cations to form a two-dimensional (4,4)-connected layer. Adjacent layers are further linked through inter­layer hydrogen-bond inter­actions, resulting in a three-dimensional supra­molecular structure.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S2053229615000546/lf3006sup1.cif
Contains datablocks I, global

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S2053229615000546/lf3006Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

pdf

Portable Document Format (PDF) file https://doi.org/10.1107/S2053229615000546/lf3006sup3.pdf
The powder X-ray diffraction pattern of (I)

CCDC reference: 1042894

Introduction top

During the past decade, the design and synthesis of coordination polymers have attracted considerable attention because of their intuitive architectures and potential applications (Bourrelly et al., 2010; Kurmoo, 2009; Lu et al., 2006). One important factor that determines the structures and functions of the resulting crystal materials is the organic ligand. To date, organic ligands such as carb­oxy­lic acid, N-heterocyclic aromatic and N-heterocyclic carb­oxy­lic acid ligands have been utilized extensively as building blocks for the construction of functional complex materials (Blake et al., 1999; Sun et al., 2006). 2-Propyl-1H-imidazole-4,5-di­carb­oxy­lic acid (H3PDI) is a nitro­gen heterocycle carboxyl­ate ditopic ligand, with one imidazole ring and two carboxyl­ate groups. In the past few years, H3PDI, with its strong coordination ability and diverse coordination modes, has attracted inter­est in the field of coordination chemistry (Chen & Liu, 2012; Deng et al., 2012; Deng, Zhong, Luo et al., 2013; Deng, Zhong, Mei et al., 2013; Deng, Zhong, Wang et al., 2013; Fan et al., 2012; Feng et al., 2010; Li et al., 2009, 2011; Zhai et al., 2013). However, based on investigations of the reported complexes of H3PDI, we have found that, due to the steric hindrance of the propyl group in the imidazole ring, most of the H3PDI-based complexes are mononuclear or one-dimensional chain structures. We report here the synthesis and structure of a two-dimensional CuII coordination polymer based on H3PDI.

Experimental top

Synthesis and crystallization top

A mixture of Cu(NO3)2.3H2 (0.5 mmol, 0.121 g), H3PD (0.5 mmol, 0.099 g), NaOH (1 mmol, 0.040 g) and H2O (10 ml) was heated at 433 K for 72 h under autogeneous pressure in a sealed 20 ml Teflon-lined stainless steel vessel. After the autoclave had been cooled over a period of 16 h at a rate of 5 K h-1, green block-shaped crystals of (I) were isolated by filtration, washed with water and dried in air [yield 0.098 g, 42.8% (based on Cu)].

Refinement top

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 1. The disorder of the propyl group of the H2PDI- anion was treated by assuming half-occupancies initially, which finally refined to 0.58. The displacement parameters of the C7/C7' and C8/C8' atoms were restricted by an EADP instruction [Please rephrase using non-software-specific terms]. To obtain a reasonable structure, the C—C bond lengths of the disordered part were constrained to 1.54 Å using a DFIX instruction [Please rephrase using non-software-specific terms]. H atoms attached to C and N atoms were placed geometrically and refined isotropically in riding mode, with C—H = 0.98–0.99 Å and N—H = 0.88 Å, and with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C,N), or 1.5Ueq(C) for methyl H [Added text OK?]. O-bound H atoms were positioned from a difference Fourier synthesis and refined with O—H = 0.84 Å, and with Uiso(H) = 1.5Ueq(O).

Results and discussion top

Under hydro­thermal conditions, the reaction of Cu(NO3)2.3H2O with H3PDI leads to the formation of [Cu(H2PDI)2]n, (I). Single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis indicates that there is one crystallographically independent CuII cation in the asymmetric unit of (I). Atom Cu1 coordinates with two N atoms and four O atoms from four separate anionic H2PDI- ligands, resulting in a slightly distorted o­cta­hedral geometry (Fig. 1). The Cu—N and Cu—O bond lengths are 1.9689 (17) and 2.0081 (15) Å, respectively (Table 2).

The H2PDI- ligand, with one carb­oxy­lic acid group deprotonated, acts as a bridge, connecting CuII cations to form a two-dimensional (4,4)-connected layer (Fig. 2). Adjacent layers are further linked through inter­layer hydrogen-bond inter­actions [N2—H2···O2 = 2.818 (2) Å], generating a three-dimensional supra­molecular structure (Table 3 and Fig. 3).

To the best of our knowledge, (I) is one of the few higher-dimensional compounds of H3PDI (Deng et al., 2012) to have been reported.

Computing details top

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 1998); cell refinement: SMART (Bruker, 1998); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 1998); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The coordination evironment of the CuII cation and coordination mode of the H2PDI- anion of (I), showing the atom-numbering scheme. The disordered parts of the propyl groups have been omitted for clarity. [Symmetry codes: (i) -x + 2, -y + 2, -z + 2; (ii) x - 1/2, -y + 3/2, z + 1/2; (iii) -x + 5/2, y + 1/2, -z + 3/2.] [Section Editors: Would you prefer an ellipsoid plot here?]
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. The two-dimensional layer structure of (I). The disordered parts of the propyl groups have been omitted for clarity.
[Figure 3] Fig. 3. The three-dimensional supramolecular structure of (I). The disordered parts of the propyl groups have been omitted for clarity.
Poly[bis(µ2-5-carboxy-2-propyl-1H-imidazole-4-carboxylato-κ3N3,O4:O5)copper(II)] top
Crystal data top
[Cu(C8H9N2O4)2]F(000) = 470
Mr = 457.88Dx = 1.640 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ynCell parameters from 2043 reflections
a = 8.344 (2) Åθ = 2.7–27.0°
b = 9.859 (2) ŵ = 1.23 mm1
c = 11.273 (3) ÅT = 113 K
β = 91.493 (4)°Block, green
V = 927.1 (4) Å30.42 × 0.38 × 0.36 mm
Z = 2
Data collection top
Bruker SMART CCD area-detector
diffractometer
1596 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1460 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.019
ϕ and ω scansθmax = 25.0°, θmin = 2.8°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 1998)
h = 99
Tmin = 0.626, Tmax = 0.665k = 118
3356 measured reflectionsl = 133
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.028Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.077H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.07 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0445P)2 + 0.6951P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1596 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
149 parametersΔρmax = 0.39 e Å3
4 restraintsΔρmin = 0.30 e Å3
Crystal data top
[Cu(C8H9N2O4)2]V = 927.1 (4) Å3
Mr = 457.88Z = 2
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation
a = 8.344 (2) ŵ = 1.23 mm1
b = 9.859 (2) ÅT = 113 K
c = 11.273 (3) Å0.42 × 0.38 × 0.36 mm
β = 91.493 (4)°
Data collection top
Bruker SMART CCD area-detector
diffractometer
1596 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 1998)
1460 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.626, Tmax = 0.665Rint = 0.019
3356 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0284 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.077H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.07Δρmax = 0.39 e Å3
1596 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.30 e Å3
149 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R-factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/UeqOcc. (<1)
Cu11.00000.50000.50000.01328 (15)
C11.1622 (2)0.6684 (2)0.35120 (17)0.0142 (4)
C21.2676 (2)0.6557 (2)0.45887 (17)0.0150 (4)
C31.1771 (2)0.7318 (2)0.24368 (17)0.0142 (4)
C41.3128 (2)0.8036 (2)0.19022 (17)0.0163 (4)
C50.9326 (2)0.6456 (2)0.25646 (17)0.0145 (4)
C60.7619 (3)0.6138 (2)0.22620 (18)0.0202 (5)
H6A0.70720.69630.19560.024*
H6B0.70680.58390.29840.024*
N11.01103 (19)0.61440 (18)0.35728 (14)0.0133 (4)
N21.0311 (2)0.71573 (18)0.18578 (14)0.0144 (4)
H21.00600.74620.11430.017*
O11.20673 (17)0.59358 (15)0.54441 (11)0.0161 (3)
O21.40414 (17)0.71056 (16)0.46081 (12)0.0189 (3)
O31.44205 (17)0.82022 (17)0.25872 (13)0.0222 (4)
H31.42870.78180.32420.033*
O41.30496 (18)0.84384 (16)0.08848 (12)0.0211 (4)
C70.7519 (8)0.4985 (7)0.1295 (6)0.0222 (12)0.483 (5)
H7A0.81920.52310.06170.027*0.483 (5)
H7B0.79320.41250.16370.027*0.483 (5)
C80.5759 (6)0.4791 (6)0.0857 (5)0.0324 (14)0.483 (5)
H8A0.50830.46110.15370.049*0.483 (5)
H8B0.56940.40230.03060.049*0.483 (5)
H8C0.53860.56160.04510.049*0.483 (5)
C7'0.7247 (8)0.4788 (6)0.1721 (5)0.0222 (12)0.517 (5)
H7'10.60720.46860.16160.027*0.517 (5)
H7'20.76390.40600.22600.027*0.517 (5)
C8'0.8032 (6)0.4650 (5)0.0532 (4)0.0271 (12)0.517 (5)
H8'10.76570.53800.00040.041*0.517 (5)
H8'20.77490.37710.01790.041*0.517 (5)
H8'30.91990.47100.06420.041*0.517 (5)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cu10.0130 (2)0.0181 (2)0.0086 (2)0.00297 (14)0.00112 (13)0.00286 (13)
C10.0140 (10)0.0158 (11)0.0128 (10)0.0026 (8)0.0000 (7)0.0020 (8)
C20.0160 (10)0.0176 (11)0.0114 (10)0.0002 (9)0.0000 (8)0.0009 (8)
C30.0147 (10)0.0168 (11)0.0110 (9)0.0008 (8)0.0010 (7)0.0002 (8)
C40.0160 (10)0.0174 (11)0.0153 (11)0.0016 (9)0.0004 (8)0.0012 (8)
C50.0161 (10)0.0152 (11)0.0122 (9)0.0004 (8)0.0010 (8)0.0003 (8)
C60.0132 (10)0.0261 (12)0.0211 (11)0.0027 (9)0.0036 (8)0.0085 (9)
N10.0126 (8)0.0160 (9)0.0114 (8)0.0015 (7)0.0001 (6)0.0002 (7)
N20.0149 (8)0.0191 (10)0.0092 (8)0.0014 (7)0.0017 (6)0.0026 (7)
O10.0171 (7)0.0206 (8)0.0106 (7)0.0037 (6)0.0011 (5)0.0017 (6)
O20.0162 (7)0.0283 (9)0.0121 (7)0.0072 (7)0.0030 (5)0.0019 (6)
O30.0163 (8)0.0344 (10)0.0157 (7)0.0085 (7)0.0012 (6)0.0058 (7)
O40.0218 (8)0.0279 (9)0.0135 (8)0.0058 (7)0.0007 (6)0.0047 (6)
C70.014 (2)0.021 (2)0.031 (4)0.0068 (16)0.002 (3)0.007 (2)
C80.023 (3)0.034 (3)0.039 (3)0.008 (2)0.016 (2)0.001 (2)
C7'0.014 (2)0.021 (2)0.031 (4)0.0068 (16)0.002 (3)0.007 (2)
C8'0.023 (2)0.030 (3)0.029 (3)0.005 (2)0.007 (2)0.001 (2)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Cu1—O12.0081 (15)C6—C7'1.493 (6)
Cu1—N11.9690 (17)C6—C71.576 (7)
Cu1—O4i2.4695 (16)C6—H6A0.9900
Cu1—O1ii2.0081 (15)C6—H6B0.9900
Cu1—N1ii1.9690 (17)N2—H20.8800
Cu1—O4iii2.4695 (16)O3—H30.8400
C1—N11.372 (3)C7—C81.549 (7)
C1—C31.372 (3)C7—H7A0.9900
C1—C21.486 (3)C7—H7B0.9900
C2—O11.260 (2)C8—H8A0.9800
C2—O21.261 (3)C8—H8B0.9800
C3—N21.376 (3)C8—H8C0.9800
C3—C41.478 (3)C7'—C8'1.514 (6)
C4—O41.214 (3)C7'—H7'10.9900
C4—O31.320 (3)C7'—H7'20.9900
C5—N11.332 (3)C8'—H8'10.9800
C5—N21.350 (3)C8'—H8'20.9800
C5—C61.490 (3)C8'—H8'30.9800
O1—Cu1—N183.25 (6)C5—C6—H6A109.6
O1—Cu1—O4i79.41 (5)C7'—C6—H6A120.1
O1—Cu1—O1ii180.00C7—C6—H6A109.6
O1—Cu1—N1ii96.75 (6)C5—C6—H6B109.6
O1—Cu1—O4iii100.59 (5)C7'—C6—H6B88.5
O4i—Cu1—N188.96 (6)C7—C6—H6B109.6
O1ii—Cu1—N196.75 (6)H6A—C6—H6B108.2
N1—Cu1—N1ii180.00C5—N1—C1107.43 (16)
O4iii—Cu1—N191.05 (6)C5—N1—Cu1142.82 (14)
O1ii—Cu1—O4i100.59 (5)C1—N1—Cu1109.00 (13)
O4i—Cu1—N1ii91.05 (6)C5—N2—C3108.91 (16)
O4i—Cu1—O4iii180.00C5—N2—H2125.5
O1ii—Cu1—N1ii83.25 (6)C3—N2—H2125.5
O1ii—Cu1—O4iii79.41 (5)C2—O1—Cu1113.16 (13)
O4iii—Cu1—N1ii88.96 (6)C4—O3—H3109.5
N1—C1—C3109.00 (17)C8—C7—C6110.0 (5)
N1—C1—C2116.88 (17)C8—C7—H7A109.7
C3—C1—C2133.98 (19)C6—C7—H7A109.7
O1—C2—O2125.28 (18)C8—C7—H7B109.7
O1—C2—C1115.08 (18)C6—C7—H7B109.7
O2—C2—C1119.57 (18)H7A—C7—H7B108.2
C1—C3—N2105.48 (17)C6—C7'—C8'110.6 (4)
C1—C3—C4131.82 (18)C6—C7'—H7'1109.5
N2—C3—C4122.70 (17)C8'—C7'—H7'1109.5
O4—C4—O3122.39 (19)C6—C7'—H7'2109.5
O4—C4—C3121.25 (18)C8'—C7'—H7'2109.5
O3—C4—C3116.35 (17)H7'1—C7'—H7'2108.1
N1—C5—N2109.18 (17)C7'—C8'—H8'1109.5
N1—C5—C6126.32 (18)C7'—C8'—H8'2109.5
N2—C5—C6124.46 (18)H8'1—C8'—H8'2109.5
C5—C6—C7'117.9 (3)C7'—C8'—H8'3109.5
C5—C6—C7110.1 (3)H8'1—C8'—H8'3109.5
C7'—C6—C721.2 (2)H8'2—C8'—H8'3109.5
Symmetry codes: (i) x+5/2, y1/2, z+1/2; (ii) x+2, y+1, z+1; (iii) x3/2, y+1/2, z1/2.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N2—H2···O2iv0.881.962.818 (2)167
O3—H3···O20.841.712.549 (2)177
Symmetry code: (iv) x1/2, y+3/2, z1/2.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula[Cu(C8H9N2O4)2]
Mr457.88
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/n
Temperature (K)113
a, b, c (Å)8.344 (2), 9.859 (2), 11.273 (3)
β (°) 91.493 (4)
V3)927.1 (4)
Z2
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)1.23
Crystal size (mm)0.42 × 0.38 × 0.36
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker SMART CCD area-detector
diffractometer
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 1998)
Tmin, Tmax0.626, 0.665
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
3356, 1596, 1460
Rint0.019
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.595
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.028, 0.077, 1.07
No. of reflections1596
No. of parameters149
No. of restraints4
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.39, 0.30

Computer programs: SMART (Bruker, 1998), SAINT (Bruker, 1998), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008).

Selected geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Cu1—O12.0081 (15)Cu1—O4i2.4695 (16)
Cu1—N11.9690 (17)Cu1—O4ii2.4695 (16)
O1—Cu1—N183.25 (6)O4i—Cu1—N188.96 (6)
O1—Cu1—O4i79.41 (5)N1—Cu1—N1iii180.00
O1—Cu1—O1iii180.00O4i—Cu1—N1iii91.05 (6)
O1—Cu1—N1iii96.75 (6)O4i—Cu1—O4ii180.00
O1—Cu1—O4ii100.59 (5)
Symmetry codes: (i) x+5/2, y1/2, z+1/2; (ii) x3/2, y+1/2, z1/2; (iii) x+2, y+1, z+1.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N2—H2···O2iv0.881.962.818 (2)166.5
O3—H3···O20.841.712.549 (2)177.3
Symmetry code: (iv) x1/2, y+3/2, z1/2.
 

Follow Acta Cryst. C
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds