Download citation
Download citation
link to html
In the crystal structure of the title compound, C10H6I2, the mol­ecules are planar and packed in T-shaped edge-to-face mode. They are held together by weak I...π and I...I non-bonding inter­molecular inter­actions.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807020508/kp2102sup1.cif
Contains datablocks global, I

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807020508/kp2102Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

CCDC reference: 647708

Key indicators

  • Single-crystal X-ray study
  • T = 223 K
  • Mean [sigma](C-C) = 0.006 Å
  • R factor = 0.033
  • wR factor = 0.077
  • Data-to-parameter ratio = 25.5

checkCIF/PLATON results

No syntax errors found



Alert level G REFLT03_ALERT_4_G Please check that the estimate of the number of Friedel pairs is correct. If it is not, please give the correct count in the _publ_section_exptl_refinement section of the submitted CIF. From the CIF: _diffrn_reflns_theta_max 30.01 From the CIF: _reflns_number_total 2783 Count of symmetry unique reflns 1667 Completeness (_total/calc) 166.95% TEST3: Check Friedels for noncentro structure Estimate of Friedel pairs measured 1116 Fraction of Friedel pairs measured 0.669 Are heavy atom types Z>Si present yes
0 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem 0 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem 0 ALERT level C = Check and explain 1 ALERT level G = General alerts; check 0 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 0 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 0 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 1 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion 0 ALERT type 5 Informative message, check

Comment top

The structure of isomer (I) has C—I bond lengths (2.090–2.103 Å) which are slightly shorter than the bond lengths in 1,8-diiodonaphthalene (2.11–2.13 Å). This can be attributed to the requirement for strain relief in the latter. The geometry of the naphthalene skeleton in (I) is similar to the parent naphthalene (Cruickshank, 1957) except for the C5—C10 bond which at 1.431 (4) Å is longer in (I) compared to 1.410 Å in the parent naphthalene. The molecules of (I) are planar (Figure 1).

The most interesting feature of the title compound (I) is its crystal packing (Figure 2) which is different from the packings in 1,8-diiodonaphthalene (Bock et al. 1998) or 2,3-diiodonaphthalene (Novak 2007). In the last two compounds crystal packing comprises π -π stacking and herringbone motif, respectively with individual molecules being held together by I···I non-bonding, van der Waals forces. In (I) on the other hand the molecules are packed in a way which facilitates T-shaped edge-face mode of intermolecular interaction (Nguyen et al. 1999). The separations pertaining to the shortest intermolecular contacts, which hold the structure together are given in Table 1.

Related literature top

The analysis of the electronic structure of 1,8-diiodonaphthalene has revealed the existence of intramolecular steric repulsions and through-space interactions between vicinal iodines (Novak et al., 2003). Pronounced steric repulsion between iodine substituents was also observed in its structure in which the I atoms are twisted out of the aromatic ring plane by 5–17° (Bock et al., 1998).

For related literature, see: Cruickshank (1957); Nguyen et al. (1999); Novak (2007).

Experimental top

The synthesis of 1,5-diiodonaphthalene was carried out according to the procedure reported previously by Novak et al. (2003). Single crystals of (I) were obtained from the sublimate.

Refinement top

H atoms were positioned geometrically (C—H = 0.94 Å) and refined as riding with Uiso (H) = 1.2 Ueq (C). The highest peak is located 0.74 Å from atom I1 and the deepest hole is located -0.908 Å from atom I1. This is a chiral space group. The Friedel equivalents were not merged. The Flack value indicates the correct absolute structure. However, the molecule is not chiral, it is the packing that results in the chiral space group.

Structure description top

The structure of isomer (I) has C—I bond lengths (2.090–2.103 Å) which are slightly shorter than the bond lengths in 1,8-diiodonaphthalene (2.11–2.13 Å). This can be attributed to the requirement for strain relief in the latter. The geometry of the naphthalene skeleton in (I) is similar to the parent naphthalene (Cruickshank, 1957) except for the C5—C10 bond which at 1.431 (4) Å is longer in (I) compared to 1.410 Å in the parent naphthalene. The molecules of (I) are planar (Figure 1).

The most interesting feature of the title compound (I) is its crystal packing (Figure 2) which is different from the packings in 1,8-diiodonaphthalene (Bock et al. 1998) or 2,3-diiodonaphthalene (Novak 2007). In the last two compounds crystal packing comprises π -π stacking and herringbone motif, respectively with individual molecules being held together by I···I non-bonding, van der Waals forces. In (I) on the other hand the molecules are packed in a way which facilitates T-shaped edge-face mode of intermolecular interaction (Nguyen et al. 1999). The separations pertaining to the shortest intermolecular contacts, which hold the structure together are given in Table 1.

The analysis of the electronic structure of 1,8-diiodonaphthalene has revealed the existence of intramolecular steric repulsions and through-space interactions between vicinal iodines (Novak et al., 2003). Pronounced steric repulsion between iodine substituents was also observed in its structure in which the I atoms are twisted out of the aromatic ring plane by 5–17° (Bock et al., 1998).

For related literature, see: Cruickshank (1957); Nguyen et al. (1999); Novak (2007).

Computing details top

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 1997); cell refinement: SMART (Bruker, 1997); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 1997); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 1997); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL.

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. Molecular structure of (I) with displacement parameters drawn at the 50% probability level.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. Crystal packing of (I) viewed along a axis. H atoms have been omitted.
1,5-Diiodonaphthalene top
Crystal data top
C10H6I2F(000) = 688
Mr = 379.95Dx = 2.556 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, P212121Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: P 2ac 2abCell parameters from 4117 reflections
a = 7.0211 (5) Åθ = 2.9–29.4°
b = 11.5366 (8) ŵ = 6.31 mm1
c = 12.1874 (8) ÅT = 223 K
V = 987.17 (12) Å3RECTANGULAR ROD, red
Z = 40.40 × 0.30 × 0.22 mm
Data collection top
Bruker SMART CCD area-detector Diffractometer2783 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube2640 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.024
ω scansθmax = 30.0°, θmin = 2.4°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
SADABS (Sheldrick, 2001)
h = 99
Tmin = 0.121, Tmax = 0.249k = 1415
8070 measured reflectionsl = 1613
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.033H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.077 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.039P)2 + 0.3767P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.09(Δ/σ)max = 0.002
2783 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.74 e Å3
109 parametersΔρmin = 0.91 e Å3
0 restraintsAbsolute structure: Flack (1983), 1116 Friedel pairs
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsAbsolute structure parameter: 0.001 (4)
Crystal data top
C10H6I2V = 987.17 (12) Å3
Mr = 379.95Z = 4
Orthorhombic, P212121Mo Kα radiation
a = 7.0211 (5) ŵ = 6.31 mm1
b = 11.5366 (8) ÅT = 223 K
c = 12.1874 (8) Å0.40 × 0.30 × 0.22 mm
Data collection top
Bruker SMART CCD area-detector Diffractometer2783 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
SADABS (Sheldrick, 2001)
2640 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.121, Tmax = 0.249Rint = 0.024
8070 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.033H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.077Δρmax = 0.74 e Å3
S = 1.09Δρmin = 0.91 e Å3
2783 reflectionsAbsolute structure: Flack (1983), 1116 Friedel pairs
109 parametersAbsolute structure parameter: 0.001 (4)
0 restraints
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
I10.49839 (5)0.36624 (3)1.00766 (3)0.05194 (10)
I21.04897 (4)0.85089 (3)0.75365 (3)0.05002 (10)
C10.5745 (6)0.5033 (4)0.9044 (3)0.0392 (8)
C20.4501 (6)0.5338 (4)0.8239 (4)0.0455 (10)
H20.33420.49390.81610.055*
C30.4960 (8)0.6258 (4)0.7519 (4)0.0454 (8)
H30.40930.64620.69640.054*
C40.6596 (6)0.6846 (4)0.7609 (3)0.0411 (8)
H40.68600.74540.71190.049*
C50.7929 (5)0.6560 (3)0.8436 (3)0.0339 (7)
C60.7516 (6)0.5630 (4)0.9176 (3)0.0349 (8)
C70.8822 (6)0.5353 (4)1.0011 (4)0.0431 (9)
H70.85250.47541.05040.052*
C81.0531 (7)0.5938 (5)1.0127 (4)0.0455 (10)
H81.14020.57281.06780.055*
C91.0939 (6)0.6865 (4)0.9391 (4)0.0438 (10)
H91.20780.72860.94650.053*
C100.9689 (5)0.7142 (4)0.8581 (3)0.0373 (8)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
I10.0586 (2)0.04360 (17)0.05359 (17)0.01052 (14)0.00536 (16)0.00267 (12)
I20.05333 (18)0.04250 (17)0.05423 (17)0.00836 (11)0.00393 (14)0.00466 (14)
C10.043 (2)0.036 (2)0.0386 (19)0.0013 (17)0.0048 (17)0.0050 (15)
C20.038 (2)0.050 (3)0.049 (2)0.0025 (19)0.0029 (18)0.0041 (19)
C30.0436 (18)0.052 (2)0.040 (2)0.003 (2)0.0097 (17)0.002 (2)
C40.0428 (19)0.043 (2)0.038 (2)0.0001 (16)0.0003 (18)0.0015 (19)
C50.0344 (17)0.0306 (19)0.0366 (17)0.0019 (15)0.0025 (14)0.0043 (15)
C60.0388 (19)0.036 (2)0.0303 (17)0.0038 (16)0.0028 (14)0.0033 (15)
C70.049 (2)0.041 (2)0.040 (2)0.0015 (17)0.0015 (19)0.0000 (18)
C80.043 (2)0.053 (3)0.041 (2)0.004 (2)0.006 (2)0.0018 (19)
C90.040 (2)0.045 (2)0.047 (2)0.0025 (18)0.0044 (18)0.0083 (19)
C100.037 (2)0.036 (2)0.0393 (19)0.0002 (17)0.0024 (16)0.0047 (15)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
I1—C12.090 (4)C5—C101.417 (5)
I2—C102.103 (4)C5—C61.432 (6)
C1—C21.360 (6)C6—C71.406 (6)
C1—C61.431 (6)C7—C81.384 (7)
C2—C31.414 (7)C7—H70.9400
C2—H20.9400C8—C91.425 (7)
C3—C41.339 (7)C8—H80.9400
C3—H30.9400C9—C101.358 (6)
C4—C51.415 (5)C9—H90.9400
C4—H40.9400
C2—C1—C6121.0 (4)C7—C6—C1122.6 (4)
C2—C1—I1117.8 (3)C7—C6—C5119.6 (4)
C6—C1—I1121.2 (3)C1—C6—C5117.8 (4)
C1—C2—C3119.7 (4)C8—C7—C6121.9 (4)
C1—C2—H2120.1C8—C7—H7119.0
C3—C2—H2120.1C6—C7—H7119.0
C4—C3—C2121.7 (4)C7—C8—C9118.4 (4)
C4—C3—H3119.2C7—C8—H8120.8
C2—C3—H3119.2C9—C8—H8120.8
C3—C4—C5120.5 (4)C10—C9—C8120.2 (4)
C3—C4—H4119.7C10—C9—H9119.9
C5—C4—H4119.7C8—C9—H9119.9
C4—C5—C10123.7 (4)C9—C10—C5122.9 (4)
C4—C5—C6119.3 (4)C9—C10—I2116.3 (3)
C10—C5—C6116.9 (3)C5—C10—I2120.8 (3)

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC10H6I2
Mr379.95
Crystal system, space groupOrthorhombic, P212121
Temperature (K)223
a, b, c (Å)7.0211 (5), 11.5366 (8), 12.1874 (8)
V3)987.17 (12)
Z4
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)6.31
Crystal size (mm)0.40 × 0.30 × 0.22
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker SMART CCD area-detector Diffractometer
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
SADABS (Sheldrick, 2001)
Tmin, Tmax0.121, 0.249
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
8070, 2783, 2640
Rint0.024
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.704
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.033, 0.077, 1.09
No. of reflections2783
No. of parameters109
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.74, 0.91
Absolute structureFlack (1983), 1116 Friedel pairs
Absolute structure parameter0.001 (4)

Computer programs: SMART (Bruker, 1997), SAINT (Bruker, 1997), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 1997), SHELXTL.

Parameters for weak intermolecular interactions (Å) top
I···II···π
I1···I23.291 (8)I2···C63.508 (9)
 

Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds