Supporting information
Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807020508/kp2102sup1.cif | |
Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807020508/kp2102Isup2.hkl |
CCDC reference: 647708
The synthesis of 1,5-diiodonaphthalene was carried out according to the procedure reported previously by Novak et al. (2003). Single crystals of (I) were obtained from the sublimate.
H atoms were positioned geometrically (C—H = 0.94 Å) and refined as riding with Uiso (H) = 1.2 Ueq (C). The highest peak is located 0.74 Å from atom I1 and the deepest hole is located -0.908 Å from atom I1. This is a chiral space group. The Friedel equivalents were not merged. The Flack value indicates the correct absolute structure. However, the molecule is not chiral, it is the packing that results in the chiral space group.
The structure of isomer (I) has C—I bond lengths (2.090–2.103 Å) which are slightly shorter than the bond lengths in 1,8-diiodonaphthalene (2.11–2.13 Å). This can be attributed to the requirement for strain relief in the latter. The geometry of the naphthalene skeleton in (I) is similar to the parent naphthalene (Cruickshank, 1957) except for the C5—C10 bond which at 1.431 (4) Å is longer in (I) compared to 1.410 Å in the parent naphthalene. The molecules of (I) are planar (Figure 1).
The most interesting feature of the title compound (I) is its crystal packing (Figure 2) which is different from the packings in 1,8-diiodonaphthalene (Bock et al. 1998) or 2,3-diiodonaphthalene (Novak 2007). In the last two compounds crystal packing comprises π -π stacking and herringbone motif, respectively with individual molecules being held together by I···I non-bonding, van der Waals forces. In (I) on the other hand the molecules are packed in a way which facilitates T-shaped edge-face mode of intermolecular interaction (Nguyen et al. 1999). The separations pertaining to the shortest intermolecular contacts, which hold the structure together are given in Table 1.
The analysis of the electronic structure of 1,8-diiodonaphthalene has revealed the existence of intramolecular steric repulsions and through-space interactions between vicinal iodines (Novak et al., 2003). Pronounced steric repulsion between iodine substituents was also observed in its structure in which the I atoms are twisted out of the aromatic ring plane by 5–17° (Bock et al., 1998).
For related literature, see: Cruickshank (1957); Nguyen et al. (1999); Novak (2007).
Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 1997); cell refinement: SMART (Bruker, 1997); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 1997); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 1997); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL.
Fig. 1. Molecular structure of (I) with displacement parameters drawn at the 50% probability level. | |
Fig. 2. Crystal packing of (I) viewed along a axis. H atoms have been omitted. |
C10H6I2 | F(000) = 688 |
Mr = 379.95 | Dx = 2.556 Mg m−3 |
Orthorhombic, P212121 | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
Hall symbol: P 2ac 2ab | Cell parameters from 4117 reflections |
a = 7.0211 (5) Å | θ = 2.9–29.4° |
b = 11.5366 (8) Å | µ = 6.31 mm−1 |
c = 12.1874 (8) Å | T = 223 K |
V = 987.17 (12) Å3 | RECTANGULAR ROD, red |
Z = 4 | 0.40 × 0.30 × 0.22 mm |
Bruker SMART CCD area-detector Diffractometer | 2783 independent reflections |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | 2640 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.024 |
ω scans | θmax = 30.0°, θmin = 2.4° |
Absorption correction: multi-scan SADABS (Sheldrick, 2001) | h = −9→9 |
Tmin = 0.121, Tmax = 0.249 | k = −14→15 |
8070 measured reflections | l = −16→13 |
Refinement on F2 | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
Least-squares matrix: full | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.033 | H-atom parameters constrained |
wR(F2) = 0.077 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.039P)2 + 0.3767P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
S = 1.09 | (Δ/σ)max = 0.002 |
2783 reflections | Δρmax = 0.74 e Å−3 |
109 parameters | Δρmin = −0.91 e Å−3 |
0 restraints | Absolute structure: Flack (1983), 1116 Friedel pairs |
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods | Absolute structure parameter: 0.001 (4) |
C10H6I2 | V = 987.17 (12) Å3 |
Mr = 379.95 | Z = 4 |
Orthorhombic, P212121 | Mo Kα radiation |
a = 7.0211 (5) Å | µ = 6.31 mm−1 |
b = 11.5366 (8) Å | T = 223 K |
c = 12.1874 (8) Å | 0.40 × 0.30 × 0.22 mm |
Bruker SMART CCD area-detector Diffractometer | 2783 independent reflections |
Absorption correction: multi-scan SADABS (Sheldrick, 2001) | 2640 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Tmin = 0.121, Tmax = 0.249 | Rint = 0.024 |
8070 measured reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.033 | H-atom parameters constrained |
wR(F2) = 0.077 | Δρmax = 0.74 e Å−3 |
S = 1.09 | Δρmin = −0.91 e Å−3 |
2783 reflections | Absolute structure: Flack (1983), 1116 Friedel pairs |
109 parameters | Absolute structure parameter: 0.001 (4) |
0 restraints |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
I1 | 0.49839 (5) | 0.36624 (3) | 1.00766 (3) | 0.05194 (10) | |
I2 | 1.04897 (4) | 0.85089 (3) | 0.75365 (3) | 0.05002 (10) | |
C1 | 0.5745 (6) | 0.5033 (4) | 0.9044 (3) | 0.0392 (8) | |
C2 | 0.4501 (6) | 0.5338 (4) | 0.8239 (4) | 0.0455 (10) | |
H2 | 0.3342 | 0.4939 | 0.8161 | 0.055* | |
C3 | 0.4960 (8) | 0.6258 (4) | 0.7519 (4) | 0.0454 (8) | |
H3 | 0.4093 | 0.6462 | 0.6964 | 0.054* | |
C4 | 0.6596 (6) | 0.6846 (4) | 0.7609 (3) | 0.0411 (8) | |
H4 | 0.6860 | 0.7454 | 0.7119 | 0.049* | |
C5 | 0.7929 (5) | 0.6560 (3) | 0.8436 (3) | 0.0339 (7) | |
C6 | 0.7516 (6) | 0.5630 (4) | 0.9176 (3) | 0.0349 (8) | |
C7 | 0.8822 (6) | 0.5353 (4) | 1.0011 (4) | 0.0431 (9) | |
H7 | 0.8525 | 0.4754 | 1.0504 | 0.052* | |
C8 | 1.0531 (7) | 0.5938 (5) | 1.0127 (4) | 0.0455 (10) | |
H8 | 1.1402 | 0.5728 | 1.0678 | 0.055* | |
C9 | 1.0939 (6) | 0.6865 (4) | 0.9391 (4) | 0.0438 (10) | |
H9 | 1.2078 | 0.7286 | 0.9465 | 0.053* | |
C10 | 0.9689 (5) | 0.7142 (4) | 0.8581 (3) | 0.0373 (8) |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
I1 | 0.0586 (2) | 0.04360 (17) | 0.05359 (17) | −0.01052 (14) | 0.00536 (16) | 0.00267 (12) |
I2 | 0.05333 (18) | 0.04250 (17) | 0.05423 (17) | −0.00836 (11) | 0.00393 (14) | 0.00466 (14) |
C1 | 0.043 (2) | 0.036 (2) | 0.0386 (19) | −0.0013 (17) | 0.0048 (17) | −0.0050 (15) |
C2 | 0.038 (2) | 0.050 (3) | 0.049 (2) | −0.0025 (19) | −0.0029 (18) | −0.0041 (19) |
C3 | 0.0436 (18) | 0.052 (2) | 0.040 (2) | 0.003 (2) | −0.0097 (17) | 0.002 (2) |
C4 | 0.0428 (19) | 0.043 (2) | 0.038 (2) | 0.0001 (16) | −0.0003 (18) | −0.0015 (19) |
C5 | 0.0344 (17) | 0.0306 (19) | 0.0366 (17) | 0.0019 (15) | 0.0025 (14) | −0.0043 (15) |
C6 | 0.0388 (19) | 0.036 (2) | 0.0303 (17) | 0.0038 (16) | 0.0028 (14) | −0.0033 (15) |
C7 | 0.049 (2) | 0.041 (2) | 0.040 (2) | 0.0015 (17) | −0.0015 (19) | 0.0000 (18) |
C8 | 0.043 (2) | 0.053 (3) | 0.041 (2) | 0.004 (2) | −0.006 (2) | 0.0018 (19) |
C9 | 0.040 (2) | 0.045 (2) | 0.047 (2) | −0.0025 (18) | −0.0044 (18) | −0.0083 (19) |
C10 | 0.037 (2) | 0.036 (2) | 0.0393 (19) | −0.0002 (17) | 0.0024 (16) | −0.0047 (15) |
I1—C1 | 2.090 (4) | C5—C10 | 1.417 (5) |
I2—C10 | 2.103 (4) | C5—C6 | 1.432 (6) |
C1—C2 | 1.360 (6) | C6—C7 | 1.406 (6) |
C1—C6 | 1.431 (6) | C7—C8 | 1.384 (7) |
C2—C3 | 1.414 (7) | C7—H7 | 0.9400 |
C2—H2 | 0.9400 | C8—C9 | 1.425 (7) |
C3—C4 | 1.339 (7) | C8—H8 | 0.9400 |
C3—H3 | 0.9400 | C9—C10 | 1.358 (6) |
C4—C5 | 1.415 (5) | C9—H9 | 0.9400 |
C4—H4 | 0.9400 | ||
C2—C1—C6 | 121.0 (4) | C7—C6—C1 | 122.6 (4) |
C2—C1—I1 | 117.8 (3) | C7—C6—C5 | 119.6 (4) |
C6—C1—I1 | 121.2 (3) | C1—C6—C5 | 117.8 (4) |
C1—C2—C3 | 119.7 (4) | C8—C7—C6 | 121.9 (4) |
C1—C2—H2 | 120.1 | C8—C7—H7 | 119.0 |
C3—C2—H2 | 120.1 | C6—C7—H7 | 119.0 |
C4—C3—C2 | 121.7 (4) | C7—C8—C9 | 118.4 (4) |
C4—C3—H3 | 119.2 | C7—C8—H8 | 120.8 |
C2—C3—H3 | 119.2 | C9—C8—H8 | 120.8 |
C3—C4—C5 | 120.5 (4) | C10—C9—C8 | 120.2 (4) |
C3—C4—H4 | 119.7 | C10—C9—H9 | 119.9 |
C5—C4—H4 | 119.7 | C8—C9—H9 | 119.9 |
C4—C5—C10 | 123.7 (4) | C9—C10—C5 | 122.9 (4) |
C4—C5—C6 | 119.3 (4) | C9—C10—I2 | 116.3 (3) |
C10—C5—C6 | 116.9 (3) | C5—C10—I2 | 120.8 (3) |
Experimental details
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | C10H6I2 |
Mr | 379.95 |
Crystal system, space group | Orthorhombic, P212121 |
Temperature (K) | 223 |
a, b, c (Å) | 7.0211 (5), 11.5366 (8), 12.1874 (8) |
V (Å3) | 987.17 (12) |
Z | 4 |
Radiation type | Mo Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 6.31 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.40 × 0.30 × 0.22 |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Bruker SMART CCD area-detector Diffractometer |
Absorption correction | Multi-scan SADABS (Sheldrick, 2001) |
Tmin, Tmax | 0.121, 0.249 |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections | 8070, 2783, 2640 |
Rint | 0.024 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.704 |
Refinement | |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.033, 0.077, 1.09 |
No. of reflections | 2783 |
No. of parameters | 109 |
H-atom treatment | H-atom parameters constrained |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 0.74, −0.91 |
Absolute structure | Flack (1983), 1116 Friedel pairs |
Absolute structure parameter | 0.001 (4) |
Computer programs: SMART (Bruker, 1997), SAINT (Bruker, 1997), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 1997), SHELXTL.
The structure of isomer (I) has C—I bond lengths (2.090–2.103 Å) which are slightly shorter than the bond lengths in 1,8-diiodonaphthalene (2.11–2.13 Å). This can be attributed to the requirement for strain relief in the latter. The geometry of the naphthalene skeleton in (I) is similar to the parent naphthalene (Cruickshank, 1957) except for the C5—C10 bond which at 1.431 (4) Å is longer in (I) compared to 1.410 Å in the parent naphthalene. The molecules of (I) are planar (Figure 1).
The most interesting feature of the title compound (I) is its crystal packing (Figure 2) which is different from the packings in 1,8-diiodonaphthalene (Bock et al. 1998) or 2,3-diiodonaphthalene (Novak 2007). In the last two compounds crystal packing comprises π -π stacking and herringbone motif, respectively with individual molecules being held together by I···I non-bonding, van der Waals forces. In (I) on the other hand the molecules are packed in a way which facilitates T-shaped edge-face mode of intermolecular interaction (Nguyen et al. 1999). The separations pertaining to the shortest intermolecular contacts, which hold the structure together are given in Table 1.