Download citation
Download citation
link to html
The crystal structure model of decafluorocyclohex-1-ene at 4.2 K derived from simulated powder diffraction data and solid-state energy minimization [Smrcok et al. (2013). Acta Cryst. B69, 395-404] is found to be incomplete. In this study it is completed by an additional alternative molecular orientation revealed from the difference density analysis and direct space search. The structure is refined by the derivative difference method in the rigid-body approximation leading to perfect agreement between observed and calculated neutron powder patterns.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S2052520613031028/kd5073sup1.cif
Contains datablock I

rtv

Rietveld powder data file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S2052520613031028/kd5073Isup2.rtv
Contains datablock I

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S2052520613031028/kd5073sup3.cif
CIF of energy-optimized substructures

CCDC reference: 971462

Experimental top

Refinement top

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 1.

Results and discussion top

Computing details top

Program(s) used to refine structure: Powder diffraction, Derivative Difference Method (DDM) L.A. Solovyov, J. Appl. Cryst. 37 (2004) 743.

(I) top
Crystal data top
C6F10V = 765.2 (2) Å3
Mr = 262.06Z = 4
Monoclinic, P21/nDx = 2.276 Mg m3
Hall symbol: -P 2ynNeutron radiation, λ = 1.9090 Å
a = 11.9302 (18) ÅT = 4 K
b = 7.2371 (11) Åwhite
c = 9.6574 (14) Å?, ? × ? × ? mm
β = 113.408 (3)°
Data collection top
D1A
diffractometer
2θmin = 10.000°, 2θmax = 53.950°, 2θstep = 0.050°
Refinement top
Least-squares matrix: fullχ2 = 1.189
Rp = 0.023880 data points
Rwp = 0.02615 parameters
Rexp = 0.0240 restraints
RBragg = 0.016(Δ/σ)max = 0.004
R(F) = 0.013
Crystal data top
C6F10β = 113.408 (3)°
Mr = 262.06V = 765.2 (2) Å3
Monoclinic, P21/nZ = 4
a = 11.9302 (18) ÅNeutron radiation, λ = 1.9090 Å
b = 7.2371 (11) ÅT = 4 K
c = 9.6574 (14) Å?, ? × ? × ? mm
Data collection top
D1A
diffractometer
2θmin = 10.000°, 2θmax = 53.950°, 2θstep = 0.050°
Refinement top
Rp = 0.023χ2 = 1.189
Rwp = 0.026880 data points
Rexp = 0.02415 parameters
RBragg = 0.0160 restraints
R(F) = 0.013
Special details top

Refinement. Two independent C6F10 molecules were refined as rigid-bodies The molecular conformations were derived from DFT energy minimization

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/UeqOcc. (<1)
C10.280170.315970.039280.012 (2)*0.5613 (36)
C20.212450.482410.058930.012 (2)*0.5613 (36)
C30.302250.643680.048600.012 (2)*0.5613 (36)
C40.393670.674120.109200.012 (2)*0.5613 (36)
C50.351400.372950.207490.012 (2)*0.5613 (36)
C60.415180.554980.222720.012 (2)*0.5613 (36)
F10.457310.830800.128410.0235 (15)*0.5613 (36)
F20.362310.604850.140470.0235 (15)*0.5613 (36)
F30.236450.801490.102000.0235 (15)*0.5613 (36)
F40.154440.427840.204600.0235 (15)*0.5613 (36)
F50.127140.543340.008210.0235 (15)*0.5613 (36)
F60.499170.590750.360720.0235 (15)*0.5613 (36)
F70.270430.380480.276930.0235 (15)*0.5613 (36)
F80.434540.238340.278300.0235 (15)*0.5613 (36)
F90.361790.250220.016060.0235 (15)*0.5613 (36)
F100.199610.179500.029900.0235 (15)*0.5613 (36)
C110.850450.152820.683270.012 (2)*0.4387 (36)
C120.774040.183670.513100.012 (2)*0.4387 (36)
C130.702250.006160.436670.012 (2)*0.4387 (36)
C140.779450.164420.485570.012 (2)*0.4387 (36)
C150.940520.012680.710260.012 (2)*0.4387 (36)
C160.883990.173480.608380.012 (2)*0.4387 (36)
F110.735210.311930.397490.0235 (15)*0.4387 (36)
F120.601200.009990.471560.0235 (15)*0.4387 (36)
F130.660800.026180.284090.0235 (15)*0.4387 (36)
F140.852080.227910.446110.0235 (15)*0.4387 (36)
F150.695310.325620.493760.0235 (15)*0.4387 (36)
F160.948570.329910.646630.0235 (15)*0.4387 (36)
F171.041590.047080.687160.0235 (15)*0.4387 (36)
F180.980650.065320.857640.0235 (15)*0.4387 (36)
F190.772900.114530.752350.0235 (15)*0.4387 (36)
F1100.913470.308800.744600.0235 (15)*0.4387 (36)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
C1—C21.549C11—C121.550
C1—C51.562C11—C151.562
C1—F91.369C11—F191.371
C1—F101.357C11—F1101.358
C2—C11.549C12—C111.550
C2—C31.560C12—C131.563
C2—F41.356C12—F141.368
C2—F51.368C12—F151.359
C3—C21.560C13—C121.563
C3—C41.502C13—C141.499
C3—F21.381C13—F121.375
C3—F31.365C13—F131.367
C4—C31.502C14—C131.499
C4—C61.341C14—C161.339
C4—F11.338C14—F111.338
C5—C11.562C15—C111.562
C5—C61.502C15—C161.501
C5—F71.382C15—F171.380
C5—F81.365C15—F181.366
C6—C41.341C16—C141.339
C6—C51.502C16—C151.501
C6—F61.338C16—F161.339
C2—C1—C5111.38C12—C11—C15111.62
C2—C1—F9108.67C12—C11—F19108.08
C2—C1—F10109.56C12—C11—F110110.01
C5—C1—F9108.52C15—C11—F19108.70
C5—C1—F10109.91C15—C11—F110109.92
F9—C1—F10108.74F19—C11—F110108.43
C1—C2—C3111.45C11—C12—C13111.40
C1—C2—F4109.88C11—C12—F14108.26
C1—C2—F5108.18C11—C12—F15109.65
C3—C2—F4109.84C13—C12—F14109.03
C3—C2—F5108.60C13—C12—F15109.79
F4—C2—F5108.83F14—C12—F15108.65
C2—C3—C4112.09C12—C13—C14112.29
C2—C3—F2108.89C12—C13—F12109.09
C2—C3—F3108.64C12—C13—F13108.91
C4—C3—F2109.90C14—C13—F12109.38
C4—C3—F3109.98C14—C13—F13109.79
F2—C3—F3107.21F12—C13—F13107.26
C3—C4—C6123.98C13—C14—C16124.40
C3—C4—F1114.78C13—C14—F11114.23
C6—C4—F1121.23C16—C14—F11121.33
C1—C5—C6112.67C11—C15—C16112.32
C1—C5—F7108.69C11—C15—F17108.65
C1—C5—F8108.78C11—C15—F18108.67
C6—C5—F7109.35C16—C15—F17110.12
C6—C5—F8110.36C16—C15—F18109.78
F7—C5—F8106.81F17—C15—F18107.15
C4—C6—C5124.14C14—C16—C15124.16
C4—C6—F6121.24C14—C16—F16121.10
C5—C6—F6114.59C15—C16—F16114.73

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC6F10
Mr262.06
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/n
Temperature (K)4
a, b, c (Å)11.9302 (18), 7.2371 (11), 9.6574 (14)
β (°) 113.408 (3)
V3)765.2 (2)
Z4
Radiation typeNeutron, λ = 1.9090 Å
Specimen shape, size (mm)?, ? × ? × ?
Data collection
DiffractometerD1A
diffractometer
Specimen mounting?
Data collection mode?
Scan method?
2θ values (°)2θmin = 10.000 2θmax = 53.950 2θstep = 0.050
Refinement
R factors and goodness of fitRp = 0.023, Rwp = 0.026, Rexp = 0.024, RBragg = 0.016, R(F) = 0.013, χ2 = 1.189
No. of data points880
No. of parameters15

Computer programs: Powder diffraction, Derivative Difference Method (DDM) L.A. Solovyov, J. Appl. Cryst. 37 (2004) 743.

 

Follow Acta Cryst. B
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds