Download citation
Download citation
link to html
The cyclo­hexyl ring in the title compound, C12H15ClO2Se, has a chair conformation with the 4-hydr­oxy group occupying an axial position; the other non-H substituents occupy equatorial positions. Mol­ecules aggregate via O—H...O hydrogen bonds into a supra­molecular helical chain.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807030851/hg2241sup1.cif
Contains datablocks global, I

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807030851/hg2241Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

CCDC reference: 655067

Key indicators

  • Single-crystal X-ray study
  • T = 223 K
  • Mean [sigma](C-C) = 0.003 Å
  • R factor = 0.029
  • wR factor = 0.077
  • Data-to-parameter ratio = 19.3

checkCIF/PLATON results

No syntax errors found



Alert level C PLAT062_ALERT_4_C Rescale T(min) & T(max) by ..................... 0.60
Alert level G ABSTM02_ALERT_3_G When printed, the submitted absorption T values will be replaced by the scaled T values. Since the ratio of scaled T's is identical to the ratio of reported T values, the scaling does not imply a change to the absorption corrections used in the study. Ratio of Tmax expected/reported 0.595 Tmax scaled 0.595 Tmin scaled 0.510 PLAT793_ALERT_1_G Check the Absolute Configuration of C1 = ... R PLAT793_ALERT_1_G Check the Absolute Configuration of C2 = ... S PLAT793_ALERT_1_G Check the Absolute Configuration of C3 = ... S PLAT793_ALERT_1_G Check the Absolute Configuration of C4 = ... S
0 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem 0 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem 1 ALERT level C = Check and explain 5 ALERT level G = General alerts; check 4 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 0 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 1 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 1 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion 0 ALERT type 5 Informative message, check

Comment top

Recently, we reported the application of epoxidation and dihydroxylation to the olefinic portion of 1,2-dioxines, giving modified 1,2-dioxines, which were subsequently converted into novel epoxy hydroxy ketones, and sugar-type derivatives (Greatrex et al., 2003; Robinson et al., 2006). In the course of investigating other useful electrophilic additions, we attempted addition of phenylselenenyl chloride across the alkene of the bicyclic peroxide 2,3-dioxa-bicyclo[2.2.2]oct-7-ene. Such additions have been well documented on other alkene bearing organic compounds (Engman, 1989; Toshimitsu et al., 1981, 1985), generally giving trans-1,2-phenylselenyl chloro adducts (Ho & Kolt, 1982; Clive et al., 1977), or in the presence of other nucleophiles, such as water or methanol, phenylselenenly alkoxide adducts can be formed (Nicolaou et al., 1979; Tiecco et al., 1988). Interestingly, addition of phenylselenenyl chloride to the peroxide was accompanied by simultaneous reduction of the peroxide bond to give the cyclohexyl-1,4-diol, (I). Also, even though the reaction was performed in methanol, no displacement of the halogen was observed.

The molecular structure of (I) (Fig. 1) shows the cyclohexyl ring to adopt a chair conformation with the Se, Cl, O1 and O4 substituents occupying equatorial, equatorial, equatorial, and axial positions, respectively. The Se—Cphenyl bond is shorter than the Se—Cmethine bond and the geometry about the Se atom is bent (Table 1). Molecules aggregate in the crystal structure via O—H···O hydrogen bonds to form a supramolecular chain (Table 2). The chain is propagated by the screw axis and thus has a helical topology (Fig. 2). Interactions between chains are of the type π···π. Phenyl substituents are interdigitated along the b axis; the Cg···Cg distance is 3.7545 (14) Å for symmetry operation -x, -y, -z. However, as seen from Fig. 3, the aromatic rings overlap only partially with the closest approach involving the C31 and C33 atoms at 3.369 (3) Å.

Related literature top

For related literature, see: Clive et al. (1977); Engman (1989); Greatrex et al. (2003); Ho & Kolt (1982); Nicolaou et al. (1979); Robinson et al. (2006); Tiecco et al. (1988); Toshimitsu et al. (1981, 1985).

Experimental top

To a stirred solution of 2,3-dioxa-bicyclo[2.2.2]oct-7-ene (100 mg, 0.9 mmol) in anhydrous methanol (5 ml) was added phenylselenenyl chloride (205 mg, 1.08 mmol) and the solution stirred under an atmosphere of N2 until reaction was complete, by TLC (ca 16 h). The reaction mixture was then diluted with dichloromethane (50 ml), washed with sat. sodium bicarbonate solution (2 x 25 ml), followed by brine (20 ml) and dried (Na2SO4). The solvent was removed in vacuo, and the residue purified by flash chromatography to give (I) as a white solid. The pure material was recrystallized from a slowly evaporating mixture of 1:1 dichloromethane/heptane to give colourless prisms (204 mg, 75%); m.p. 381–382 K. Rf 0.26 (2:3 ethyl acetate/hexane). Elemental analysis found: C 47.15, H, 4.95%; C12H15ClO2Se requires: C 47.26, H, 5.02%. IR (nujol) 3297, 1581, 1506, 1330, 1046, 1000 cm-1. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ 1.49–1.55 (m, 1H), 1.87–1.95 (m, 2H), 2.05 (dddd, J = 3.6, 3.6, 7.8, 14.4 Hz, 1H), 2.46 (br s, 2H), 3.44 (dd, J = 2.4, 11.4 Hz, 1H), 3.65 (ddd, J = 6.3, 9.0, 10.2 Hz, 1H), 3.85 (ddd, J = 2.4, 2.4, 3.6 Hz, 1H), 4.13 (dd, J = 9.0, 11.4 Hz, 1H), 7.29–7.36 (m, 3H), 7.63–7.66 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 25.7, 28.6, 56.9, 66.1, 66.1, 75.4, 127.6, 128.5, 129.5, 137.2. MS m/z (+EI): 308 (M+, 37Cl, 23), 306 (M+, 35Cl, 52), 158 (100), 131 (31), 113 (24), 77 (61), 67 (84).

Refinement top

All H atoms were included in the riding-model approximation, with C—H = 0.94 to 0.99 Å and O—H = 0.83 Å, and with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C) and Uiso(H) = 1.5Ueq(O).

Structure description top

Recently, we reported the application of epoxidation and dihydroxylation to the olefinic portion of 1,2-dioxines, giving modified 1,2-dioxines, which were subsequently converted into novel epoxy hydroxy ketones, and sugar-type derivatives (Greatrex et al., 2003; Robinson et al., 2006). In the course of investigating other useful electrophilic additions, we attempted addition of phenylselenenyl chloride across the alkene of the bicyclic peroxide 2,3-dioxa-bicyclo[2.2.2]oct-7-ene. Such additions have been well documented on other alkene bearing organic compounds (Engman, 1989; Toshimitsu et al., 1981, 1985), generally giving trans-1,2-phenylselenyl chloro adducts (Ho & Kolt, 1982; Clive et al., 1977), or in the presence of other nucleophiles, such as water or methanol, phenylselenenly alkoxide adducts can be formed (Nicolaou et al., 1979; Tiecco et al., 1988). Interestingly, addition of phenylselenenyl chloride to the peroxide was accompanied by simultaneous reduction of the peroxide bond to give the cyclohexyl-1,4-diol, (I). Also, even though the reaction was performed in methanol, no displacement of the halogen was observed.

The molecular structure of (I) (Fig. 1) shows the cyclohexyl ring to adopt a chair conformation with the Se, Cl, O1 and O4 substituents occupying equatorial, equatorial, equatorial, and axial positions, respectively. The Se—Cphenyl bond is shorter than the Se—Cmethine bond and the geometry about the Se atom is bent (Table 1). Molecules aggregate in the crystal structure via O—H···O hydrogen bonds to form a supramolecular chain (Table 2). The chain is propagated by the screw axis and thus has a helical topology (Fig. 2). Interactions between chains are of the type π···π. Phenyl substituents are interdigitated along the b axis; the Cg···Cg distance is 3.7545 (14) Å for symmetry operation -x, -y, -z. However, as seen from Fig. 3, the aromatic rings overlap only partially with the closest approach involving the C31 and C33 atoms at 3.369 (3) Å.

For related literature, see: Clive et al. (1977); Engman (1989); Greatrex et al. (2003); Ho & Kolt (1982); Nicolaou et al. (1979); Robinson et al. (2006); Tiecco et al. (1988); Toshimitsu et al. (1981, 1985).

Computing details top

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2000); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2000); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SIR92 (Altomare et al., 1994); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: ORTEPII (Johnson, 1976) and DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2006); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. Molecular structure of (I) showing atom-labelling scheme and displacement ellipsoids at the 50% probability level.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. View of the supramolecular chain in (I) mediated by hydrogen bonds, shown as orange-dashed lines. Colour code: yellow (selenium), cyan (chloride), red (oxygen), grey (carbon) and green (hydrogen).
[Figure 3] Fig. 3. View of the unit-cell contents of (I) down the b axis. Hydrogen bonding (O—H···O) contacts are shown as orange-dashed lines.
(+)-(1R,2S,3S,4S)-2-Chloro-3-(phenylselanyl)cyclohexane-1,4-diol top
Crystal data top
C12H15ClO2SeF(000) = 616
Mr = 305.65Dx = 1.649 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71069 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 2654 reflections
a = 13.5529 (10) Åθ = 2.3–29.0°
b = 7.0627 (5) ŵ = 3.25 mm1
c = 12.9203 (9) ÅT = 223 K
β = 95.443 (1)°Block, colourless
V = 1231.16 (15) Å30.47 × 0.18 × 0.16 mm
Z = 4
Data collection top
Bruker SMART CCD
diffractometer
2832 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube2524 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.025
ω scansθmax = 27.5°, θmin = 1.5°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2000)
h = 1717
Tmin = 0.857, Tmax = 1k = 97
8348 measured reflectionsl = 1416
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.029Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.077H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.07 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0442P)2 + 0.3384P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2832 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
147 parametersΔρmax = 0.61 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.31 e Å3
Crystal data top
C12H15ClO2SeV = 1231.16 (15) Å3
Mr = 305.65Z = 4
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation
a = 13.5529 (10) ŵ = 3.25 mm1
b = 7.0627 (5) ÅT = 223 K
c = 12.9203 (9) Å0.47 × 0.18 × 0.16 mm
β = 95.443 (1)°
Data collection top
Bruker SMART CCD
diffractometer
2832 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2000)
2524 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.857, Tmax = 1Rint = 0.025
8348 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0290 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.077H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.07Δρmax = 0.61 e Å3
2832 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.31 e Å3
147 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Se30.223073 (15)0.05198 (3)0.126906 (17)0.02977 (9)
Cl20.26790 (4)0.52886 (7)0.17758 (4)0.03242 (13)
O10.44699 (11)0.57891 (19)0.33447 (12)0.0285 (3)
H10.49600.54190.30610.043*
O40.40103 (11)0.05964 (19)0.26849 (13)0.0302 (3)
H40.41390.16910.28900.045*
C10.38350 (15)0.4218 (3)0.34966 (16)0.0247 (4)
H1A0.32890.46690.38910.030*
C20.33780 (14)0.3428 (3)0.24551 (15)0.0220 (4)
H20.39200.30410.20380.026*
C30.27180 (14)0.1719 (3)0.25939 (15)0.0232 (4)
H30.21380.21440.29440.028*
C40.32598 (15)0.0194 (3)0.32663 (17)0.0264 (4)
H4A0.27830.08140.34070.032*
C50.37069 (17)0.1005 (3)0.42939 (17)0.0314 (4)
H5A0.40830.00140.46890.038*
H5B0.31730.14220.47020.038*
C60.43905 (16)0.2672 (3)0.41313 (16)0.0296 (4)
H6A0.46510.31840.48080.035*
H6B0.49520.22380.37690.035*
C310.09343 (14)0.1616 (3)0.10249 (16)0.0270 (4)
C320.06268 (16)0.2203 (3)0.00253 (17)0.0319 (5)
H320.10730.21920.04890.038*
C330.03398 (17)0.2810 (3)0.02180 (18)0.0372 (5)
H330.05500.31890.09010.045*
C340.09930 (17)0.2861 (3)0.05327 (19)0.0374 (5)
H340.16470.32810.03660.045*
C350.06820 (17)0.2291 (4)0.15351 (19)0.0412 (6)
H350.11240.23410.20530.049*
C360.02774 (17)0.1648 (4)0.17807 (18)0.0371 (5)
H360.04810.12340.24590.045*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Se30.02667 (13)0.02833 (14)0.03375 (14)0.00167 (8)0.00011 (9)0.00736 (8)
Cl20.0381 (3)0.0241 (3)0.0338 (3)0.0085 (2)0.0032 (2)0.0045 (2)
O10.0286 (7)0.0197 (7)0.0374 (8)0.0010 (6)0.0037 (6)0.0028 (6)
O40.0291 (8)0.0170 (7)0.0455 (9)0.0032 (5)0.0093 (7)0.0031 (6)
C10.0271 (10)0.0206 (9)0.0263 (10)0.0002 (7)0.0022 (8)0.0000 (7)
C20.0227 (9)0.0176 (9)0.0256 (9)0.0036 (7)0.0020 (7)0.0014 (7)
C30.0213 (8)0.0217 (9)0.0265 (9)0.0001 (7)0.0024 (7)0.0015 (7)
C40.0245 (9)0.0214 (9)0.0338 (11)0.0019 (8)0.0056 (8)0.0041 (8)
C50.0364 (11)0.0289 (10)0.0284 (11)0.0004 (9)0.0008 (9)0.0084 (9)
C60.0336 (11)0.0267 (10)0.0267 (10)0.0010 (8)0.0061 (8)0.0018 (8)
C310.0237 (9)0.0242 (10)0.0326 (10)0.0014 (8)0.0005 (8)0.0034 (8)
C320.0332 (11)0.0314 (11)0.0311 (11)0.0013 (9)0.0025 (9)0.0006 (9)
C330.0372 (12)0.0383 (12)0.0343 (12)0.0014 (10)0.0068 (10)0.0013 (10)
C340.0286 (10)0.0386 (13)0.0436 (13)0.0046 (9)0.0041 (9)0.0071 (10)
C350.0312 (11)0.0530 (15)0.0401 (13)0.0021 (11)0.0066 (10)0.0037 (11)
C360.0332 (11)0.0472 (14)0.0305 (11)0.0009 (10)0.0004 (9)0.0007 (10)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Se3—C31.9669 (19)C5—C61.525 (3)
Se3—C311.919 (2)C5—H5A0.9800
C2—Cl21.7990 (19)C5—H5B0.9800
C1—O11.429 (2)C6—H6A0.9800
O1—H10.8300C6—H6B0.9800
C4—O41.434 (3)C31—C321.383 (3)
O4—H40.8300C31—C361.383 (3)
C1—C61.521 (3)C32—C331.386 (3)
C1—C21.532 (3)C32—H320.9400
C1—H1A0.9900C33—C341.374 (3)
C2—C31.523 (3)C33—H330.9400
C2—H20.9900C34—C351.383 (3)
C3—C41.527 (3)C34—H340.9400
C3—H30.9900C35—C361.386 (3)
C4—C51.518 (3)C35—H350.9400
C4—H4A0.9900C36—H360.9400
C3—Se3—C31101.31 (8)C6—C5—H5A109.3
C1—O1—H1109.5C4—C5—H5B109.3
C4—O4—H4109.5C6—C5—H5B109.3
O1—C1—C6110.96 (16)H5A—C5—H5B108.0
O1—C1—C2111.13 (16)C1—C6—C5110.63 (17)
C6—C1—C2110.52 (16)C1—C6—H6A109.5
O1—C1—H1A108.0C5—C6—H6A109.5
C6—C1—H1A108.0C1—C6—H6B109.5
C2—C1—H1A108.0C5—C6—H6B109.5
C3—C2—C1112.21 (16)H6A—C6—H6B108.1
C3—C2—Cl2110.39 (13)C32—C31—C36119.85 (19)
C1—C2—Cl2108.25 (13)C32—C31—Se3117.70 (16)
C3—C2—H2108.6C36—C31—Se3122.11 (16)
C1—C2—H2108.6C31—C32—C33119.9 (2)
Cl2—C2—H2108.6C31—C32—H32120.0
C2—C3—C4111.71 (15)C33—C32—H32120.0
C2—C3—Se3113.03 (13)C34—C33—C32120.4 (2)
C4—C3—Se3107.17 (13)C34—C33—H33119.8
C2—C3—H3108.3C32—C33—H33119.8
C4—C3—H3108.3C33—C34—C35119.6 (2)
Se3—C3—H3108.3C33—C34—H34120.2
O4—C4—C5111.15 (17)C35—C34—H34120.2
O4—C4—C3107.65 (16)C36—C35—C34120.4 (2)
C5—C4—C3111.23 (17)C36—C35—H35119.8
O4—C4—H4A108.9C34—C35—H35119.8
C5—C4—H4A108.9C35—C36—C31119.8 (2)
C3—C4—H4A108.9C35—C36—H36120.1
C4—C5—C6111.59 (17)C31—C36—H36120.1
C4—C5—H5A109.3
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1—H1···O4i0.831.912.737 (2)174
O4—H4···O1ii0.831.912.744 (2)178
Symmetry codes: (i) x+1, y+1/2, z+1/2; (ii) x, y1, z.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC12H15ClO2Se
Mr305.65
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/c
Temperature (K)223
a, b, c (Å)13.5529 (10), 7.0627 (5), 12.9203 (9)
β (°) 95.443 (1)
V3)1231.16 (15)
Z4
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)3.25
Crystal size (mm)0.47 × 0.18 × 0.16
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker SMART CCD
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2000)
Tmin, Tmax0.857, 1
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
8348, 2832, 2524
Rint0.025
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.650
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.029, 0.077, 1.07
No. of reflections2832
No. of parameters147
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.61, 0.31

Computer programs: SMART (Bruker, 2000), SAINT (Bruker, 2000), SAINT, SIR92 (Altomare et al., 1994), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), ORTEPII (Johnson, 1976) and DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2006), SHELXL97.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1—H1···O4i0.831.912.737 (2)174
O4—H4···O1ii0.831.912.744 (2)178
Symmetry codes: (i) x+1, y+1/2, z+1/2; (ii) x, y1, z.
 

Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds