Download citation
Download citation
link to html
The crystal structure of the title compound, C9H6F3N, at 123 K contains mol­ecules linked together via several C—H...F and C—H...N contacts, the strongest of which are 2.58 and 2.65 Å, respectively. Apparently, an F atom in the CF3 group is able to compete with a cyano N atom for aromatic H atoms but is less prone to interact with the more acidic methyl­ene H atoms. The Ph–CH2CN torsion angle is −6.4 (2)° and the planar phenyl ring exhibits a typical deformation of the endo angles at the ipso-C atoms, due to the difference in the electron-withdrawing power of the CF3 and CH2CN substituents.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270102000707/gg1095sup1.cif
Contains datablocks global, I

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270102000707/gg1095Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

CCDC reference: 182997

Comment top

The molecular structure of 4-(trifluoromethyl)benzonitrile, (I) (Boitsov et al., 2002), has revealed that the molecules are closely packed due to several intermolecular F···H and N···H contacts. A comparison between the F···H contacts (2.50 Å), the N···H contacts (2.56 and 2.59 Å) and the sum of the van der Waals radii (2.67 Å for F···H and 2.75 Å for N···H) indicated that one of the F atoms, located close to the phenyl-ring plane, could readily compete with the cyano N atoms for the H atoms, even though the N···H distances are shorter than in either benzonitrile (2.67 Å; Fauvet et al., 1978) or 1,4-(dicyano)benzene (2.61 Å; Colapietro et al., 1984). The F···H interactions (Desiraju & Steiner, 1999) in (I), however, were not sufficiently strong to significantly alter any of the structural parameters of the C—CF3 fragment (Schultz et al., 1981; Kovacs et al., 1996) of the molecule but is the probable cause for the fairly high melting point of the compound compared with that of 4-methylbenzonitrile. Furthermore, the close packing of 4-(trifluoromethyl)benzonitrile, (I), gives rise to a relatively high crystal density of 1.550 Mg m-3.

It has been suggested that the strength of F···H interactions may be related to both the acidity of the H atom involved (Thalladi et al., 1998) and the hybridization of the C atom to which it is bonded (Desiraju & Steiner, 1999). We report herein the molecular structure of [4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]acetonitrile, (II), a compound which contains H atoms linked to both sp2– and sp3-hybridized C atoms. This compound melts at 321 K, significantly higher than [4-(methyl)phenyl]acetonitrile (293 K).

It is clear that the packing structure (Fig. 2) does not resemble reported structures of aryl cyanides which are based upon parallel layers linked together by antiparallel contacts between neighbouring cyano groups (Colapietro et al., 1984) nor on CH2···Ar(H···π), CN···Ar (Bond et al., 2001) or Ar···Ar interactions. Molecules of (II) are linked together through four unique contacts (see Table 2) from which three are clearly shorter than the sum of the van der Waals radii (2.67 Å for F···H and 2.75 Å for N···H; Bondi, 1964), F1···H6, N···H7A and N···H3, the fourth F1···H7B being a borderline contact, 2.67 Å. The relatively small intermolecular bond angles, 123–146°, are typical for these types of hydrogen-bond interactions, as presented in scatterplots of H···F distances versus C—H···F angles by Thalladi et al. (1998).

The N···H7A intermolecular contacts connect the molecules into columns along [010] and the N···H3 contacts join two molecules related by an inversion centre. These are further connected via F1···H6 and possibly also F1···H7B contacts into sheets propagating along [101]. As in the structure of 4-(trifluoromethyl)benzonitrile (Boitsov et al., 2002), the N atom participates in bifurcated intermolecular hydrogen-bond interactions. It seems that an F atom (F1) is able to compete with the cyano N atom for the aromatic H atoms but does not favour interactions with the more acidic methylene H atoms (Bordwell, 1988). The shortest distances between the sheets are by F2···H3(x, -1 + y, z) and F3···H6(1/2 + x, 1/2 - y, 1/2 + z) of 2.74 and 2.72 Å, respectively. There are no overlaps between the rings in the crystal and the shortest distance between rings is C5···H5(1/2 - x, 1/2 + y, 1/2 - z) of 2.89 Å [ΣvdW(C+H) is 2.90 Å], with the two rings related by an angle of about 99°, as measured over H5—C5···H5.

All bond lengths and angles listed in Table 1 are in principle as expected. The endo angles C2—C1—C6 and C3—C4—C5 reflect the difference in electron-withdrawing power of the substituents CF3 and CH2CN (Colapietro et al., 1984), cf. the Hammett σp values of -0.54 (CF3) and \sim0.2 (CH2CN), the latter derived from -0.66 (CN) assuming a transmission coefficient of \sim0.3 for a CH2 group (Hine, 1962).

The phenyl ring is planar within experimental error and is otherwise symmetrical with respect to the bond lengths and angles. The C—F1 bond, involved in a weak intermolecular interaction with H6, and possibly also H7B, is slightly longer than F2—C9 and F3—C9; cf. the suggested elongation of one of the C—F bonds in 2-(trifluoromethyl)phenol (Kovacs et al., 1996). Furthermore, the F1—C9—C4 bond angle is smaller than those of F2—C9—C4 and F3—C9—C4. The two exo bond angles around C1 are distinctly different, indicating the effect of the proximity of the CH2CN group to the plane of the ring, the C2—C1—C7—C8 torsion angle is -6.4 (2)°. [The Cambridge Structural Database (Version 5.21; Allen & Kennard, 1993) contains presently some 30 crystal structures of arylacetonitriles; however, no particular range of torsion angles seems to be favoured.] Similarly, the two exo angles around C4 differ, likely due to F3 being closer to the plane of the ring than F2. The distances (Å) of the non-aromatic atoms from the plane of the phenyl ring are: F1 - 1.284 (2), F2 0.686 (2), F3 0.429 (2), C7 0.054 (2), C8 - 0.055 (2), C9 - 0.031 (2) and N -0.150 (3) Å. The pertinent torsion angles are given in Table 1.

Experimental top

[4-(Trifluoromethyl)phenyl]acetonitrile (Aldrich, 98%) was dissolved in a minimum volume of diethyl ether at room temperature. Hexane was then added and the diethyl ether removed by evaporation. After filtration, the solution was left at room temperature overnight for crystallization. The solid was washed with cold hexane and dried. Crystals suitable for crystallographic study were obtained by slow crystallization from cyclohexane at room temperature (m.p. 321–322 K).

Refinement top

The H atoms were treated as riding, with C—H(CH) and C—H(CH2) distances of 0.95 and 0.99 Å, respectively. The isotropic displacement parameters of the H atoms were fixed at 1.2Ueq of their parent atoms. The maximum residual peak is located on the C4—C5 bond, 0.68 Å from C4.

Computing details top

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 1999); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2001); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1990); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2001b); molecular graphics: SHELXTL/PC (Sheldrick, 2001a); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL/PC and PLATON (Spek, 2001).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The molecular structure of (I). Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. The packing structure of (I) with a [101] sheet centred around the inversion centre at (1/2,1,0). The weak F1···H7B contacts have been included. H atoms (H2 and H5) not participating in hydrogen bonding have been omitted. Atoms labelled with the suffix A lie at positions (1 - x, 2 - y, -z), B at (x, 1 + y, z), C at (1/2 - x, 1/2 + y, 1/2 - z), D at (1/2 - x, -1/2 + y, 1/2 - z), E at (1 - x, 1 - y, -z), F(1/2 + x, 5/2 - y, -1/2 + z) and G at (1/2 + x, 3/2 - y, -1/2 + z).
[4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]acetonitrile top
Crystal data top
C9H6F3NF(000) = 376
Mr = 185.15Dx = 1.535 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/nMelting point: 48-49° C K
Hall symbol: -P 2ynMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 11.9085 (15) ÅCell parameters from 4798 reflections
b = 5.5168 (7) Åθ = 2.3–28.2°
c = 12.2376 (15) ŵ = 0.14 mm1
β = 94.67 (3)°T = 123 K
V = 801.30 (17) Å3Needle, colourless
Z = 40.55 × 0.12 × 0.10 mm
Data collection top
Bruker AXS SMART 2K CCD
diffractometer
1984 independent reflections
Radiation source: normal-focus sealed tube1541 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.044
ω scansθmax = 28.3°, θmin = 2.3°
Absorption correction: numerical
(SHELXTL/PC; Sheldrick 2001a)
h = 1515
Tmin = 0.937, Tmax = 0.991k = 77
11234 measured reflectionsl = 1616
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.044Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.125H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.00 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0895P)2]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1984 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
118 parametersΔρmax = 0.47 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.34 e Å3
Crystal data top
C9H6F3NV = 801.30 (17) Å3
Mr = 185.15Z = 4
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation
a = 11.9085 (15) ŵ = 0.14 mm1
b = 5.5168 (7) ÅT = 123 K
c = 12.2376 (15) Å0.55 × 0.12 × 0.10 mm
β = 94.67 (3)°
Data collection top
Bruker AXS SMART 2K CCD
diffractometer
1984 independent reflections
Absorption correction: numerical
(SHELXTL/PC; Sheldrick 2001a)
1541 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.937, Tmax = 0.991Rint = 0.044
11234 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0440 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.125H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.00Δρmax = 0.47 e Å3
1984 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.34 e Å3
118 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
F10.40753 (7)0.35793 (17)0.42576 (7)0.0374 (3)
F20.47320 (7)0.03793 (16)0.35519 (7)0.0364 (3)
F30.57378 (7)0.36128 (17)0.36928 (7)0.0372 (3)
N0.34142 (11)0.9956 (2)0.15647 (10)0.0331 (3)
C10.32420 (11)0.5166 (2)0.03198 (10)0.0222 (3)
C20.41226 (11)0.6452 (2)0.08568 (11)0.0254 (3)
H20.44000.78700.05300.030*
C30.46010 (11)0.5677 (3)0.18710 (11)0.0251 (3)
H30.52030.65640.22370.030*
C40.41976 (10)0.3612 (2)0.23453 (10)0.0220 (3)
C50.33092 (11)0.2319 (3)0.18199 (11)0.0253 (3)
H50.30310.09040.21490.030*
C60.28337 (11)0.3111 (2)0.08131 (11)0.0249 (3)
H60.22210.22410.04550.030*
C70.27086 (12)0.5867 (3)0.08045 (11)0.0267 (3)
H7A0.28550.45600.13280.032*
H7B0.18830.59750.07680.032*
C80.31094 (11)0.8160 (3)0.12318 (11)0.0249 (3)
C90.46882 (11)0.2799 (3)0.34483 (11)0.0260 (3)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
F10.0395 (5)0.0510 (6)0.0228 (4)0.0123 (4)0.0095 (4)0.0042 (4)
F20.0469 (6)0.0293 (5)0.0322 (5)0.0068 (4)0.0019 (4)0.0014 (4)
F30.0271 (5)0.0504 (6)0.0329 (5)0.0021 (4)0.0044 (4)0.0004 (4)
N0.0391 (7)0.0306 (7)0.0299 (6)0.0019 (5)0.0048 (5)0.0015 (5)
C10.0217 (6)0.0230 (7)0.0222 (6)0.0009 (5)0.0049 (5)0.0024 (5)
C20.0265 (7)0.0226 (7)0.0275 (7)0.0035 (5)0.0050 (5)0.0013 (5)
C30.0223 (6)0.0260 (7)0.0271 (7)0.0027 (5)0.0015 (5)0.0063 (5)
C40.0209 (6)0.0247 (7)0.0210 (6)0.0032 (5)0.0054 (5)0.0041 (5)
C50.0253 (7)0.0257 (7)0.0256 (7)0.0036 (5)0.0058 (5)0.0004 (5)
C60.0229 (7)0.0267 (7)0.0252 (7)0.0053 (5)0.0031 (5)0.0032 (5)
C70.0289 (7)0.0275 (7)0.0238 (6)0.0047 (6)0.0017 (5)0.0007 (5)
C80.0250 (7)0.0289 (7)0.0211 (6)0.0020 (5)0.0034 (5)0.0022 (5)
C90.0247 (7)0.0292 (7)0.0244 (7)0.0026 (5)0.0038 (5)0.0049 (5)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
F1—C91.3478 (15)C4—C91.4953 (18)
F2—C91.3416 (18)C5—C61.3842 (19)
F3—C91.3388 (16)C7—C81.4636 (19)
N—C81.1415 (18)C2—H20.9500
C1—C21.3865 (18)C3—H30.9500
C1—C61.3907 (18)C5—H50.9500
C1—C71.5179 (19)C6—H60.9500
C2—C31.3902 (19)C7—H7A0.9900
C3—C41.3824 (19)C7—H7B0.9900
C4—C51.3896 (18)
C2—C1—C6119.28 (12)F2—C9—C4113.15 (11)
C2—C1—C7122.93 (12)F3—C9—C4112.96 (12)
C6—C1—C7117.78 (11)C6—C5—H5120.3
C1—C2—C3120.32 (13)C4—C5—H5120.3
C4—C3—C2119.81 (12)C5—C6—H6119.6
C3—C4—C5120.43 (12)C1—C6—H6119.6
C3—C4—C9120.17 (12)C1—C2—H2119.8
C5—C4—C9119.36 (13)C3—C2—H2119.8
C6—C5—C4119.37 (13)C4—C3—H3120.1
C5—C6—C1120.78 (12)C2—C3—H3120.1
C8—C7—C1114.81 (11)C8—C7—H7A108.6
N—C8—C7179.49 (15)C1—C7—H7A108.6
F2—C9—F1105.52 (12)C8—C7—H7B108.6
F3—C9—F1106.28 (11)C1—C7—H7B108.6
F3—C9—F2106.51 (11)H7A—C7—H7B107.5
F1—C9—C4111.86 (11)
C6—C1—C2—C30.8 (2)C7—C1—C6—C5177.64 (12)
C7—C1—C2—C3177.94 (12)C2—C1—C7—C86.39 (19)
C1—C2—C3—C40.1 (2)C6—C1—C7—C8174.85 (12)
C2—C3—C4—C50.7 (2)C3—C4—C9—F196.13 (15)
C2—C3—C4—C9178.51 (12)C3—C4—C9—F2144.86 (12)
C3—C4—C5—C60.3 (2)C3—C4—C9—F323.73 (17)
C9—C4—C5—C6178.17 (12)C5—C4—C9—F237.26 (16)
C4—C5—C6—C10.6 (2)C5—C4—C9—F3158.38 (12)
C2—C1—C6—C51.2 (2)C5—C4—C9—F181.75 (16)

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC9H6F3N
Mr185.15
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/n
Temperature (K)123
a, b, c (Å)11.9085 (15), 5.5168 (7), 12.2376 (15)
β (°) 94.67 (3)
V3)801.30 (17)
Z4
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)0.14
Crystal size (mm)0.55 × 0.12 × 0.10
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker AXS SMART 2K CCD
diffractometer
Absorption correctionNumerical
(SHELXTL/PC; Sheldrick 2001a)
Tmin, Tmax0.937, 0.991
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
11234, 1984, 1541
Rint0.044
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.667
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.044, 0.125, 1.00
No. of reflections1984
No. of parameters118
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.47, 0.34

Computer programs: SMART (Bruker, 1999), SAINT (Bruker, 2001), SAINT, SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1990), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2001b), SHELXTL/PC (Sheldrick, 2001a), SHELXTL/PC and PLATON (Spek, 2001).

Selected geometric parameters (Å, º) top
F1—C91.3478 (15)C2—C31.3902 (19)
F2—C91.3416 (18)C3—C41.3824 (19)
F3—C91.3388 (16)C4—C51.3896 (18)
N—C81.1415 (18)C4—C91.4953 (18)
C1—C21.3865 (18)C5—C61.3842 (19)
C1—C61.3907 (18)C7—C81.4636 (19)
C1—C71.5179 (19)
C2—C1—C6119.28 (12)N—C8—C7179.49 (15)
C2—C1—C7122.93 (12)F2—C9—F1105.52 (12)
C6—C1—C7117.78 (11)F3—C9—F1106.28 (11)
C3—C4—C5120.43 (12)F3—C9—F2106.51 (11)
C3—C4—C9120.17 (12)F1—C9—C4111.86 (11)
C5—C4—C9119.36 (13)F2—C9—C4113.15 (11)
C8—C7—C1114.81 (11)F3—C9—C4112.96 (12)
C2—C1—C7—C86.39 (19)C3—C4—C9—F323.73 (17)
C3—C4—C9—F196.13 (15)C5—C4—C9—F237.26 (16)
C3—C4—C9—F2144.86 (12)
Short intermolecular distances and associated bond angles (Å, °) top
C—H···AC—HH···AC···AC—H···A
C3—H3···Ni0.952.703.417 (2)133
C6—H6···F1ii0.952.583.376 (2)141
C7—H7A···Niii0.992.653.512 (2)146
C7—H7B···F1iv0.992.673.315 (2)123
Symmetry codes: (i) 1-x,2-y,-z; (ii) 1/2-x,y-1/2,1/2-z; (iii) x,y-1,z; (iv) 1/2-x,1/2+y,1/2-z.
 

Follow Acta Cryst. C
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds