Supporting information
Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270102000707/gg1095sup1.cif | |
Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270102000707/gg1095Isup2.hkl |
CCDC reference: 182997
[4-(Trifluoromethyl)phenyl]acetonitrile (Aldrich, 98%) was dissolved in a minimum volume of diethyl ether at room temperature. Hexane was then added and the diethyl ether removed by evaporation. After filtration, the solution was left at room temperature overnight for crystallization. The solid was washed with cold hexane and dried. Crystals suitable for crystallographic study were obtained by slow crystallization from cyclohexane at room temperature (m.p. 321–322 K).
The H atoms were treated as riding, with C—H(CH) and C—H(CH2) distances of 0.95 and 0.99 Å, respectively. The isotropic displacement parameters of the H atoms were fixed at 1.2Ueq of their parent atoms. The maximum residual peak is located on the C4—C5 bond, 0.68 Å from C4.
Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 1999); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2001); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1990); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2001b); molecular graphics: SHELXTL/PC (Sheldrick, 2001a); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL/PC and PLATON (Spek, 2001).
C9H6F3N | F(000) = 376 |
Mr = 185.15 | Dx = 1.535 Mg m−3 |
Monoclinic, P21/n | Melting point: 48-49° C K |
Hall symbol: -P 2yn | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
a = 11.9085 (15) Å | Cell parameters from 4798 reflections |
b = 5.5168 (7) Å | θ = 2.3–28.2° |
c = 12.2376 (15) Å | µ = 0.14 mm−1 |
β = 94.67 (3)° | T = 123 K |
V = 801.30 (17) Å3 | Needle, colourless |
Z = 4 | 0.55 × 0.12 × 0.10 mm |
Bruker AXS SMART 2K CCD diffractometer | 1984 independent reflections |
Radiation source: normal-focus sealed tube | 1541 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.044 |
ω scans | θmax = 28.3°, θmin = 2.3° |
Absorption correction: numerical (SHELXTL/PC; Sheldrick 2001a) | h = −15→15 |
Tmin = 0.937, Tmax = 0.991 | k = −7→7 |
11234 measured reflections | l = −16→16 |
Refinement on F2 | Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods |
Least-squares matrix: full | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.044 | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
wR(F2) = 0.125 | H-atom parameters constrained |
S = 1.00 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0895P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
1984 reflections | (Δ/σ)max < 0.001 |
118 parameters | Δρmax = 0.47 e Å−3 |
0 restraints | Δρmin = −0.34 e Å−3 |
C9H6F3N | V = 801.30 (17) Å3 |
Mr = 185.15 | Z = 4 |
Monoclinic, P21/n | Mo Kα radiation |
a = 11.9085 (15) Å | µ = 0.14 mm−1 |
b = 5.5168 (7) Å | T = 123 K |
c = 12.2376 (15) Å | 0.55 × 0.12 × 0.10 mm |
β = 94.67 (3)° |
Bruker AXS SMART 2K CCD diffractometer | 1984 independent reflections |
Absorption correction: numerical (SHELXTL/PC; Sheldrick 2001a) | 1541 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Tmin = 0.937, Tmax = 0.991 | Rint = 0.044 |
11234 measured reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.044 | 0 restraints |
wR(F2) = 0.125 | H-atom parameters constrained |
S = 1.00 | Δρmax = 0.47 e Å−3 |
1984 reflections | Δρmin = −0.34 e Å−3 |
118 parameters |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
F1 | 0.40753 (7) | 0.35793 (17) | 0.42576 (7) | 0.0374 (3) | |
F2 | 0.47320 (7) | 0.03793 (16) | 0.35519 (7) | 0.0364 (3) | |
F3 | 0.57378 (7) | 0.36128 (17) | 0.36928 (7) | 0.0372 (3) | |
N | 0.34142 (11) | 0.9956 (2) | −0.15647 (10) | 0.0331 (3) | |
C1 | 0.32420 (11) | 0.5166 (2) | 0.03198 (10) | 0.0222 (3) | |
C2 | 0.41226 (11) | 0.6452 (2) | 0.08568 (11) | 0.0254 (3) | |
H2 | 0.4400 | 0.7870 | 0.0530 | 0.030* | |
C3 | 0.46010 (11) | 0.5677 (3) | 0.18710 (11) | 0.0251 (3) | |
H3 | 0.5203 | 0.6564 | 0.2237 | 0.030* | |
C4 | 0.41976 (10) | 0.3612 (2) | 0.23453 (10) | 0.0220 (3) | |
C5 | 0.33092 (11) | 0.2319 (3) | 0.18199 (11) | 0.0253 (3) | |
H5 | 0.3031 | 0.0904 | 0.2149 | 0.030* | |
C6 | 0.28337 (11) | 0.3111 (2) | 0.08131 (11) | 0.0249 (3) | |
H6 | 0.2221 | 0.2241 | 0.0455 | 0.030* | |
C7 | 0.27086 (12) | 0.5867 (3) | −0.08045 (11) | 0.0267 (3) | |
H7A | 0.2855 | 0.4560 | −0.1328 | 0.032* | |
H7B | 0.1883 | 0.5975 | −0.0768 | 0.032* | |
C8 | 0.31094 (11) | 0.8160 (3) | −0.12318 (11) | 0.0249 (3) | |
C9 | 0.46882 (11) | 0.2799 (3) | 0.34483 (11) | 0.0260 (3) |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
F1 | 0.0395 (5) | 0.0510 (6) | 0.0228 (4) | 0.0123 (4) | 0.0095 (4) | −0.0042 (4) |
F2 | 0.0469 (6) | 0.0293 (5) | 0.0322 (5) | 0.0068 (4) | −0.0019 (4) | 0.0014 (4) |
F3 | 0.0271 (5) | 0.0504 (6) | 0.0329 (5) | −0.0021 (4) | −0.0044 (4) | −0.0004 (4) |
N | 0.0391 (7) | 0.0306 (7) | 0.0299 (6) | −0.0019 (5) | 0.0048 (5) | 0.0015 (5) |
C1 | 0.0217 (6) | 0.0230 (7) | 0.0222 (6) | 0.0009 (5) | 0.0049 (5) | −0.0024 (5) |
C2 | 0.0265 (7) | 0.0226 (7) | 0.0275 (7) | −0.0035 (5) | 0.0050 (5) | −0.0013 (5) |
C3 | 0.0223 (6) | 0.0260 (7) | 0.0271 (7) | −0.0027 (5) | 0.0015 (5) | −0.0063 (5) |
C4 | 0.0209 (6) | 0.0247 (7) | 0.0210 (6) | 0.0032 (5) | 0.0054 (5) | −0.0041 (5) |
C5 | 0.0253 (7) | 0.0257 (7) | 0.0256 (7) | −0.0036 (5) | 0.0058 (5) | −0.0004 (5) |
C6 | 0.0229 (7) | 0.0267 (7) | 0.0252 (7) | −0.0053 (5) | 0.0031 (5) | −0.0032 (5) |
C7 | 0.0289 (7) | 0.0275 (7) | 0.0238 (6) | −0.0047 (6) | 0.0017 (5) | −0.0007 (5) |
C8 | 0.0250 (7) | 0.0289 (7) | 0.0211 (6) | 0.0020 (5) | 0.0034 (5) | −0.0022 (5) |
C9 | 0.0247 (7) | 0.0292 (7) | 0.0244 (7) | 0.0026 (5) | 0.0038 (5) | −0.0049 (5) |
F1—C9 | 1.3478 (15) | C4—C9 | 1.4953 (18) |
F2—C9 | 1.3416 (18) | C5—C6 | 1.3842 (19) |
F3—C9 | 1.3388 (16) | C7—C8 | 1.4636 (19) |
N—C8 | 1.1415 (18) | C2—H2 | 0.9500 |
C1—C2 | 1.3865 (18) | C3—H3 | 0.9500 |
C1—C6 | 1.3907 (18) | C5—H5 | 0.9500 |
C1—C7 | 1.5179 (19) | C6—H6 | 0.9500 |
C2—C3 | 1.3902 (19) | C7—H7A | 0.9900 |
C3—C4 | 1.3824 (19) | C7—H7B | 0.9900 |
C4—C5 | 1.3896 (18) | ||
C2—C1—C6 | 119.28 (12) | F2—C9—C4 | 113.15 (11) |
C2—C1—C7 | 122.93 (12) | F3—C9—C4 | 112.96 (12) |
C6—C1—C7 | 117.78 (11) | C6—C5—H5 | 120.3 |
C1—C2—C3 | 120.32 (13) | C4—C5—H5 | 120.3 |
C4—C3—C2 | 119.81 (12) | C5—C6—H6 | 119.6 |
C3—C4—C5 | 120.43 (12) | C1—C6—H6 | 119.6 |
C3—C4—C9 | 120.17 (12) | C1—C2—H2 | 119.8 |
C5—C4—C9 | 119.36 (13) | C3—C2—H2 | 119.8 |
C6—C5—C4 | 119.37 (13) | C4—C3—H3 | 120.1 |
C5—C6—C1 | 120.78 (12) | C2—C3—H3 | 120.1 |
C8—C7—C1 | 114.81 (11) | C8—C7—H7A | 108.6 |
N—C8—C7 | 179.49 (15) | C1—C7—H7A | 108.6 |
F2—C9—F1 | 105.52 (12) | C8—C7—H7B | 108.6 |
F3—C9—F1 | 106.28 (11) | C1—C7—H7B | 108.6 |
F3—C9—F2 | 106.51 (11) | H7A—C7—H7B | 107.5 |
F1—C9—C4 | 111.86 (11) | ||
C6—C1—C2—C3 | 0.8 (2) | C7—C1—C6—C5 | 177.64 (12) |
C7—C1—C2—C3 | −177.94 (12) | C2—C1—C7—C8 | −6.39 (19) |
C1—C2—C3—C4 | 0.1 (2) | C6—C1—C7—C8 | 174.85 (12) |
C2—C3—C4—C5 | −0.7 (2) | C3—C4—C9—F1 | 96.13 (15) |
C2—C3—C4—C9 | −178.51 (12) | C3—C4—C9—F2 | −144.86 (12) |
C3—C4—C5—C6 | 0.3 (2) | C3—C4—C9—F3 | −23.73 (17) |
C9—C4—C5—C6 | 178.17 (12) | C5—C4—C9—F2 | 37.26 (16) |
C4—C5—C6—C1 | 0.6 (2) | C5—C4—C9—F3 | 158.38 (12) |
C2—C1—C6—C5 | −1.2 (2) | C5—C4—C9—F1 | −81.75 (16) |
Experimental details
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | C9H6F3N |
Mr | 185.15 |
Crystal system, space group | Monoclinic, P21/n |
Temperature (K) | 123 |
a, b, c (Å) | 11.9085 (15), 5.5168 (7), 12.2376 (15) |
β (°) | 94.67 (3) |
V (Å3) | 801.30 (17) |
Z | 4 |
Radiation type | Mo Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 0.14 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.55 × 0.12 × 0.10 |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Bruker AXS SMART 2K CCD diffractometer |
Absorption correction | Numerical (SHELXTL/PC; Sheldrick 2001a) |
Tmin, Tmax | 0.937, 0.991 |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections | 11234, 1984, 1541 |
Rint | 0.044 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.667 |
Refinement | |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.044, 0.125, 1.00 |
No. of reflections | 1984 |
No. of parameters | 118 |
H-atom treatment | H-atom parameters constrained |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 0.47, −0.34 |
Computer programs: SMART (Bruker, 1999), SAINT (Bruker, 2001), SAINT, SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1990), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2001b), SHELXTL/PC (Sheldrick, 2001a), SHELXTL/PC and PLATON (Spek, 2001).
F1—C9 | 1.3478 (15) | C2—C3 | 1.3902 (19) |
F2—C9 | 1.3416 (18) | C3—C4 | 1.3824 (19) |
F3—C9 | 1.3388 (16) | C4—C5 | 1.3896 (18) |
N—C8 | 1.1415 (18) | C4—C9 | 1.4953 (18) |
C1—C2 | 1.3865 (18) | C5—C6 | 1.3842 (19) |
C1—C6 | 1.3907 (18) | C7—C8 | 1.4636 (19) |
C1—C7 | 1.5179 (19) | ||
C2—C1—C6 | 119.28 (12) | N—C8—C7 | 179.49 (15) |
C2—C1—C7 | 122.93 (12) | F2—C9—F1 | 105.52 (12) |
C6—C1—C7 | 117.78 (11) | F3—C9—F1 | 106.28 (11) |
C3—C4—C5 | 120.43 (12) | F3—C9—F2 | 106.51 (11) |
C3—C4—C9 | 120.17 (12) | F1—C9—C4 | 111.86 (11) |
C5—C4—C9 | 119.36 (13) | F2—C9—C4 | 113.15 (11) |
C8—C7—C1 | 114.81 (11) | F3—C9—C4 | 112.96 (12) |
C2—C1—C7—C8 | −6.39 (19) | C3—C4—C9—F3 | −23.73 (17) |
C3—C4—C9—F1 | 96.13 (15) | C5—C4—C9—F2 | 37.26 (16) |
C3—C4—C9—F2 | −144.86 (12) |
C—H···A | C—H | H···A | C···A | C—H···A |
C3—H3···Ni | 0.95 | 2.70 | 3.417 (2) | 133 |
C6—H6···F1ii | 0.95 | 2.58 | 3.376 (2) | 141 |
C7—H7A···Niii | 0.99 | 2.65 | 3.512 (2) | 146 |
C7—H7B···F1iv | 0.99 | 2.67 | 3.315 (2) | 123 |
Symmetry codes: (i) 1-x,2-y,-z; (ii) 1/2-x,y-1/2,1/2-z; (iii) x,y-1,z; (iv) 1/2-x,1/2+y,1/2-z. |
The molecular structure of 4-(trifluoromethyl)benzonitrile, (I) (Boitsov et al., 2002), has revealed that the molecules are closely packed due to several intermolecular F···H and N···H contacts. A comparison between the F···H contacts (2.50 Å), the N···H contacts (2.56 and 2.59 Å) and the sum of the van der Waals radii (2.67 Å for F···H and 2.75 Å for N···H) indicated that one of the F atoms, located close to the phenyl-ring plane, could readily compete with the cyano N atoms for the H atoms, even though the N···H distances are shorter than in either benzonitrile (2.67 Å; Fauvet et al., 1978) or 1,4-(dicyano)benzene (2.61 Å; Colapietro et al., 1984). The F···H interactions (Desiraju & Steiner, 1999) in (I), however, were not sufficiently strong to significantly alter any of the structural parameters of the C—CF3 fragment (Schultz et al., 1981; Kovacs et al., 1996) of the molecule but is the probable cause for the fairly high melting point of the compound compared with that of 4-methylbenzonitrile. Furthermore, the close packing of 4-(trifluoromethyl)benzonitrile, (I), gives rise to a relatively high crystal density of 1.550 Mg m-3.
It has been suggested that the strength of F···H interactions may be related to both the acidity of the H atom involved (Thalladi et al., 1998) and the hybridization of the C atom to which it is bonded (Desiraju & Steiner, 1999). We report herein the molecular structure of [4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]acetonitrile, (II), a compound which contains H atoms linked to both sp2– and sp3-hybridized C atoms. This compound melts at 321 K, significantly higher than [4-(methyl)phenyl]acetonitrile (293 K).
It is clear that the packing structure (Fig. 2) does not resemble reported structures of aryl cyanides which are based upon parallel layers linked together by antiparallel contacts between neighbouring cyano groups (Colapietro et al., 1984) nor on CH2···Ar(H···π), CN···Ar (Bond et al., 2001) or Ar···Ar interactions. Molecules of (II) are linked together through four unique contacts (see Table 2) from which three are clearly shorter than the sum of the van der Waals radii (2.67 Å for F···H and 2.75 Å for N···H; Bondi, 1964), F1···H6, N···H7A and N···H3, the fourth F1···H7B being a borderline contact, 2.67 Å. The relatively small intermolecular bond angles, 123–146°, are typical for these types of hydrogen-bond interactions, as presented in scatterplots of H···F distances versus C—H···F angles by Thalladi et al. (1998).
The N···H7A intermolecular contacts connect the molecules into columns along [010] and the N···H3 contacts join two molecules related by an inversion centre. These are further connected via F1···H6 and possibly also F1···H7B contacts into sheets propagating along [101]. As in the structure of 4-(trifluoromethyl)benzonitrile (Boitsov et al., 2002), the N atom participates in bifurcated intermolecular hydrogen-bond interactions. It seems that an F atom (F1) is able to compete with the cyano N atom for the aromatic H atoms but does not favour interactions with the more acidic methylene H atoms (Bordwell, 1988). The shortest distances between the sheets are by F2···H3(x, -1 + y, z) and F3···H6(1/2 + x, 1/2 - y, 1/2 + z) of 2.74 and 2.72 Å, respectively. There are no overlaps between the rings in the crystal and the shortest distance between rings is C5···H5(1/2 - x, 1/2 + y, 1/2 - z) of 2.89 Å [ΣvdW(C+H) is 2.90 Å], with the two rings related by an angle of about 99°, as measured over H5—C5···H5.
All bond lengths and angles listed in Table 1 are in principle as expected. The endo angles C2—C1—C6 and C3—C4—C5 reflect the difference in electron-withdrawing power of the substituents CF3 and CH2CN (Colapietro et al., 1984), cf. the Hammett σp values of -0.54 (CF3) and \sim0.2 (CH2CN), the latter derived from -0.66 (CN) assuming a transmission coefficient of \sim0.3 for a CH2 group (Hine, 1962).
The phenyl ring is planar within experimental error and is otherwise symmetrical with respect to the bond lengths and angles. The C—F1 bond, involved in a weak intermolecular interaction with H6, and possibly also H7B, is slightly longer than F2—C9 and F3—C9; cf. the suggested elongation of one of the C—F bonds in 2-(trifluoromethyl)phenol (Kovacs et al., 1996). Furthermore, the F1—C9—C4 bond angle is smaller than those of F2—C9—C4 and F3—C9—C4. The two exo bond angles around C1 are distinctly different, indicating the effect of the proximity of the CH2CN group to the plane of the ring, the C2—C1—C7—C8 torsion angle is -6.4 (2)°. [The Cambridge Structural Database (Version 5.21; Allen & Kennard, 1993) contains presently some 30 crystal structures of arylacetonitriles; however, no particular range of torsion angles seems to be favoured.] Similarly, the two exo angles around C4 differ, likely due to F3 being closer to the plane of the ring than F2. The distances (Å) of the non-aromatic atoms from the plane of the phenyl ring are: F1 - 1.284 (2), F2 0.686 (2), F3 0.429 (2), C7 0.054 (2), C8 - 0.055 (2), C9 - 0.031 (2) and N -0.150 (3) Å. The pertinent torsion angles are given in Table 1.