Download citation
Download citation
link to html
In each of methyl 2-methyl-5-oxo-2-pyrroline-3-carboxyl­ate, C7H9NO3, and 3-acetyl-2-methyl-2-pyrrolin-5-one, C7H9NO2, the pyrrolinone ring is planar. In each structure, mol­ecules are linked into simple chains by way of a single N—H...O hydrogen bond.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270107038632/gd3127sup1.cif
Contains datablocks I, II, global

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270107038632/gd3127Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270107038632/gd3127IIsup3.hkl
Contains datablock II

CCDC references: 665496; 665497

Comment top

As precursors for the synthesis of pyrrole derivatives, 2-pyrrolin-5-one derivatives have been prepared by the reaction of glyoxal with enaminoesters (San Feliciano et al., 1989). However, pyrrolinones accessible by this method are few in number. We report here the structures of two such compounds, namely 2-methyl-3-methoxycarbonyl-2-pyrrolin-5-one, (I) and 2-methyl-3-acetyl-2-pyrrolin-5-one, (II) (Figs. 1 and 2).

In each molecule, the five-membered ring (N1/C1–C4) is planar, with r.m.s deviations from the mean plane of 0.007 Å for (I) and 0.006 Å for (II). Within the pyrrolinone rings in (I) and (II), the bond distances provide evidence for π-conjugation and are different from those in substituted ethylenedi(2-pyrrolin-5-one) (Zhang et al., 2007). The N1—C2 and N1—C5 bonds [1.391 (2) and 1.359 (2) Å, respectively, for (I), and 1.396 (2) and 1.358 (2) Å, respectively, for (II)] are shorter than the corresponding bonds in ethylenedi(2-pyrrolin-5-one) [1.411 and 1.385 Å, respectively]. Conversely, the C2—C3 bond becomes longer [1.385 and 1.411 Å in (I) and (II), respectively, versus 1.349 Å in ethylenedi(2-pyrrolin-5-one)]. This indicates that the lone pair of electrons on atom N1 and the π electrons of C2C3 in (I) and (II) exhibit significant delocalization compared with ethylenedi(2-pyrrolin-5-one).

In (I), the exocyclic bond angles show some significant variations. The two independent exocyclic angles (Table 1) at atom C2 differ by some 16°, while those at atom C3 differ by more than 10°. The sense of these deviations suggests strongly repulsive interactions between the methyl group on C2 and the methoxycarbonyl group, although there is a moderate intramolecular C—H···O hydrogen bond between them (Table 3). By contrast, the deviations of the angles (Table 4) at atoms C2 and C3 in (II) become larger, where there is no intramolecular interaction between methyl and acetyl groups. The sums of the three angles around atoms C2 and C3 in (I) are 360.00 (2) and 359.95 (2)°, respectively, and the corresponding values in (II) are 359.99 (2) and 359.92 (2)°, respectively.

It was found that the 1H NMR spectrum of compound (II) shows the methylene H atoms of the pyrrolinone ring as a doublet at δ = 3.34 p.p.m., with an identical coupling constant (J = 2 Hz) to the C2—CH3 H atoms. The feature is, however, inconsistent with that in (I), where the methylene H atoms give a quartet with coupling constant J = 2.4 Hz. This suggests that, even in solution, the methyl group bonded to C2 in (II) has a stable conformation with respect to the pyrrolinone ring.

In compound (I), the molecules are linked into zigzag chains by a single N—H···O hydrogen bond (Table 2). Heterocyclic atom N1 in the molecule at (x, y, z) acts as a hydrogen-bond donor to carbonyl atom O1 in the molecule at (2 − x, y − 1/2, 5/2 − z), thus forming a C(4) chain (Bernstein et al., 1995) running along the (1, y, 5/4) direction and generated by a 21 screw axis along (1, y, 5/4) (Fig. 3). Four chains of this type pass through each unit cell; two of these chains, running along the directions (1, y, 1/4) and (0, y, 1/4), are related to one another by translational symmetry operations and are antiparallel to the other two chains, running along the (1, y, 3/4) and (0, y, −1/4) directions. There are no direction-specific interactions between adjacent chains.

In a similar way, the supramolecular structure of compound (II) takes on a simple chain packing. For the sake of simplicity, we shall omit any further consideration of the intermolecular C—H···O interactions involving a C—H bond from a methyl group, which are unlikely to have any structural significance. The molecules of (II) are connected into infinite chains by a single N—H···O hydrogen bond (Table 4). Heterocyclic atom N1 in the molecule at (x, y, z) acts as a hydrogen-bond donor to carbonyl atom O1 in the molecule at (−x, y − 1/2, 3/2 − z), so generating a C(4) chain running along the (0, y, 3/4) direction and generated by a 21 screw axis along (0, y, 3/4) (Fig. 4). Four such chains pass through each unit cell; two of these chains, running along the directions (0, y, 3/4) and (1, y, 1/4), are related to one another by inversion and are hence antiparallel. There are no direction-specific interactions between adjacent chains.

Experimental top

Rather than the published method of San Feliciano et al. (1989), a modification of the synthetic procedure of [Please give reference for unmodified procedure] was used to prepare (I) and (II).

For compound, (I), methyl β-aminocrotonate (23 g) and excess glyoxal (40% in water, 25 ml) were mixed at room temperature in water (80 ml). The mixture was then allowed to stand overnight to give red crystals of (I) (yield 26%). The product was recrystallized from ethyl acetate. 1H NMR (CDCl3, δ, p.p.m.): 7.76 (s, 1H, NH), 3.71 (s, 3H, COOCH3), 3.28 (q, J = 2.4 Hz, 2H, CH2), 2.35 (t, J = 2.4 Hz, 3H, CH3).

For the synthesis of (II), excess aqueous ammonia (17%, 0.22 mol) was introduced into a stirred solution of 2,4-pentanedione (20 g, 0.2 mol) in water (80 ml) at room temperature. After 2 h, excess glyoxal (40% in water, 25 ml) was added with stirring and the mixture was then allowed to stand overnight to give red crystals of (II) (yield 23%). The product was recrystallized from ethyl acetate. 1H NMR (CDCl3, δ, p.p.m.): 7.28 (s, 1H, NH), 3.34 (d, J = 2 Hz, 2H, CH2), 2.38 (t, J = 2 Hz, 3H, CH3), 2.20 (s, 3H, COCH3).

Refinement top

H atoms were placed in idealized positions and allowed to ride on their respective parent atoms, with C—H = 0.98 Å and N—H = 0.86 Å, and with Uiso(H) = kUeq(carrier atom), where k = 1.2 for C—H and N—H, and 1.5 for the methyl groups.

Computing details top

For both compounds, data collection: SMART (Bruker, 1997); cell refinement: SMART; data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 1997); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997a); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997a); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 1997b); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL.

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The molecular structure of (I), showing the atom-labelling scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. The molecular structure of (II), showing the atom-labelling scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level.
[Figure 3] Fig. 3. Part of the crystal structure of (I), showing the formation of a C(4) chain running along the (1, y, 5/4) direction. Atoms marked with an asterisk (*) and or an ampersand (&) are at the symmetry positions (2 − x, y − 1/2, 5/2 − z) and (2 − x, 1/2 + y, 5/2 − z), respectively.
[Figure 4] Fig. 4. Part of the crystal structure of (II), showing the formation of a C(4) chain running along the (0, y, 3/4) direction. For the sake of clarity, H atoms not involved in the motif shown have been omitted. Atoms marked with an asterisk (*) or an ampersand (&) are at the symmetry positions (−x, y − 1/2, 3/2 − z) and (−x, 1/2 + y, 3/2 − z), respectively.
(I) methyl 2-methyl-5-oxo-2-pyrroline-3-carboxylate top
Crystal data top
C7H9NO3Z = 4
Mr = 155.15F(000) = 328
Monoclinic, P21/cDx = 1.398 Mg m3
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 12.377 (3) ŵ = 0.11 mm1
b = 7.562 (2) ÅT = 291 K
c = 7.880 (2) ÅBlock, red
β = 91.509 (3)°0.36 × 0.32 × 0.23 mm
V = 737.4 (3) Å3
Data collection top
Bruker SMART CCD area-detector
diffractometer
1371 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1095 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.045
ϕ and ω scansθmax = 25.5°, θmin = 3.2°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)
h = 1414
Tmin = 0.958, Tmax = 0.975k = 99
5325 measured reflectionsl = 99
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.048Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.142H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.31 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0731P)2]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1371 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
102 parametersΔρmax = 0.24 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.24 e Å3
Crystal data top
C7H9NO3V = 737.4 (3) Å3
Mr = 155.15Z = 4
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation
a = 12.377 (3) ŵ = 0.11 mm1
b = 7.562 (2) ÅT = 291 K
c = 7.880 (2) Å0.36 × 0.32 × 0.23 mm
β = 91.509 (3)°
Data collection top
Bruker SMART CCD area-detector
diffractometer
1371 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)
1095 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.958, Tmax = 0.975Rint = 0.045
5325 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0480 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.142H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.31Δρmax = 0.24 e Å3
1371 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.24 e Å3
102 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O11.02268 (11)0.25843 (17)1.23592 (18)0.0546 (4)
O20.66840 (11)0.49951 (17)0.90559 (17)0.0565 (5)
O30.60684 (10)0.22581 (17)0.85190 (16)0.0476 (4)
N10.89483 (11)0.07468 (18)1.11840 (17)0.0398 (4)
H10.92440.02391.14810.048*
C20.79683 (14)0.0866 (2)1.0285 (2)0.0357 (4)
C30.77377 (13)0.2592 (2)0.99831 (19)0.0352 (5)
C40.86311 (14)0.3709 (2)1.0741 (2)0.0381 (4)
H4A0.83590.45151.15870.046*
H4B0.89890.43850.98730.046*
C50.93881 (14)0.2356 (2)1.1542 (2)0.0393 (5)
C60.68033 (14)0.3413 (2)0.9159 (2)0.0380 (4)
C70.51227 (16)0.3048 (3)0.7723 (3)0.0545 (6)
H7A0.47300.36940.85560.082*
H7B0.46690.21370.72430.082*
H7C0.53390.38390.68420.082*
C10.73973 (16)0.0812 (2)0.9848 (2)0.0484 (5)
H1A0.67640.05560.91630.073*
H1B0.71900.13961.08710.073*
H1C0.78700.15680.92280.073*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0485 (9)0.0394 (8)0.0748 (9)0.0023 (6)0.0211 (7)0.0054 (6)
O20.0561 (9)0.0278 (8)0.0848 (10)0.0039 (6)0.0157 (7)0.0004 (6)
O30.0393 (8)0.0343 (8)0.0685 (9)0.0011 (5)0.0118 (6)0.0007 (5)
N10.0410 (9)0.0248 (8)0.0531 (9)0.0018 (6)0.0069 (7)0.0010 (5)
C20.0335 (9)0.0317 (10)0.0419 (9)0.0007 (6)0.0004 (7)0.0013 (6)
C30.0359 (10)0.0280 (9)0.0416 (9)0.0016 (7)0.0001 (7)0.0020 (6)
C40.0418 (10)0.0282 (9)0.0441 (9)0.0019 (7)0.0021 (8)0.0009 (6)
C50.0388 (10)0.0315 (10)0.0473 (9)0.0008 (7)0.0028 (8)0.0033 (7)
C60.0386 (10)0.0304 (10)0.0449 (9)0.0007 (7)0.0003 (7)0.0005 (6)
C70.0426 (11)0.0469 (11)0.0734 (13)0.0027 (9)0.0143 (9)0.0009 (9)
C10.0476 (12)0.0302 (11)0.0670 (12)0.0065 (8)0.0041 (9)0.0031 (8)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
O1—C51.219 (2)C3—C41.503 (2)
O2—C61.208 (2)C4—C51.514 (2)
O3—C61.349 (2)C4—H4A0.9700
O3—C71.443 (2)C4—H4B0.9700
N1—C51.359 (2)C7—H7A0.9600
N1—C21.391 (2)C7—H7B0.9600
N1—H10.8600C7—H7C0.9600
C2—C31.356 (2)C1—H1A0.9600
C2—C11.489 (2)C1—H1B0.9600
C3—C61.451 (2)C1—H1C0.9600
C6—O3—C7115.19 (14)O1—C5—C4129.27 (15)
C5—N1—C2112.74 (14)N1—C5—C4106.16 (14)
C5—N1—H1123.6O2—C6—O3122.40 (16)
C2—N1—H1123.6O2—C6—C3123.26 (16)
C3—C2—N1109.18 (15)O3—C6—C3114.34 (15)
C3—C2—C1133.14 (17)O3—C7—H7A109.5
N1—C2—C1117.68 (15)O3—C7—H7B109.5
C2—C3—C6130.69 (16)H7A—C7—H7B109.5
C2—C3—C4108.78 (15)O3—C7—H7C109.5
C6—C3—C4120.47 (15)H7A—C7—H7C109.5
C3—C4—C5103.09 (14)H7B—C7—H7C109.5
C3—C4—H4A111.1C2—C1—H1A109.5
C5—C4—H4A111.1C2—C1—H1B109.5
C3—C4—H4B111.1H1A—C1—H1B109.5
C5—C4—H4B111.1C2—C1—H1C109.5
H4A—C4—H4B109.1H1A—C1—H1C109.5
O1—C5—N1124.57 (16)H1B—C1—H1C109.5
C5—N1—C2—C31.4 (2)C2—N1—C5—C41.96 (19)
C5—N1—C2—C1178.83 (15)C3—C4—C5—O1177.99 (18)
N1—C2—C3—C6177.45 (15)C3—C4—C5—N11.74 (16)
C1—C2—C3—C62.8 (3)C7—O3—C6—O20.9 (2)
N1—C2—C3—C40.10 (19)C7—O3—C6—C3178.84 (14)
C1—C2—C3—C4179.87 (18)C2—C3—C6—O2176.11 (17)
C2—C3—C4—C51.00 (16)C4—C3—C6—O21.0 (2)
C6—C3—C4—C5176.66 (14)C2—C3—C6—O33.6 (2)
C2—N1—C5—O1177.78 (16)C4—C3—C6—O3179.34 (14)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1···O1i0.861.992.832 (2)168
Symmetry code: (i) x+2, y1/2, z+5/2.
(II) 3-acetyl-2-methyl-2-pyrrolin-5-one top
Crystal data top
C7H9NO2F(000) = 296
Mr = 139.15Dx = 1.333 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 2403 reflections
a = 12.1211 (18) Åθ = 3.2–27.9°
b = 7.5078 (11) ŵ = 0.10 mm1
c = 7.9542 (12) ÅT = 291 K
β = 106.740 (2)°Block, red
V = 693.18 (18) Å30.47 × 0.29 × 0.24 mm
Z = 4
Data collection top
Bruker SMART CCD area-detector
diffractometer
1289 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1150 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.013
ϕ and ω scansθmax = 25.5°, θmin = 3.2°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)
h = 1414
Tmin = 0.954, Tmax = 0.977k = 99
4420 measured reflectionsl = 99
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.039H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.124 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0671P)2 + 0.1884P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.08(Δ/σ)max = 0.002
1289 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.23 e Å3
94 parametersΔρmin = 0.17 e Å3
0 restraintsExtinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997a), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction coefficient: 0.028 (6)
Crystal data top
C7H9NO2V = 693.18 (18) Å3
Mr = 139.15Z = 4
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation
a = 12.1211 (18) ŵ = 0.10 mm1
b = 7.5078 (11) ÅT = 291 K
c = 7.9542 (12) Å0.47 × 0.29 × 0.24 mm
β = 106.740 (2)°
Data collection top
Bruker SMART CCD area-detector
diffractometer
1289 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)
1150 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.954, Tmax = 0.977Rint = 0.013
4420 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0390 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.124H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.08Δρmax = 0.23 e Å3
1289 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.17 e Å3
94 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O10.02438 (10)0.26227 (16)0.71716 (18)0.0592 (4)
O20.35189 (12)0.50023 (17)0.5789 (2)0.0665 (4)
N10.11219 (10)0.07418 (16)0.67140 (17)0.0413 (4)
H10.08020.02420.68730.050*
C20.21757 (12)0.08393 (19)0.63349 (18)0.0367 (4)
C30.24331 (12)0.25712 (18)0.61258 (18)0.0360 (4)
C40.14733 (13)0.3716 (2)0.63916 (19)0.0396 (4)
H4A0.10990.43840.53370.048*
H4B0.17590.45410.73580.048*
C50.06589 (13)0.2374 (2)0.6804 (2)0.0412 (4)
C10.27636 (16)0.0892 (2)0.6268 (3)0.0529 (5)
H1A0.34990.06750.60790.079*
H1B0.22990.16010.53230.079*
H1C0.28710.15130.73580.079*
C60.34462 (13)0.3380 (2)0.57991 (19)0.0423 (4)
C70.44042 (14)0.2258 (3)0.5512 (2)0.0519 (5)
H7A0.49450.30080.51750.078*
H7B0.40910.14050.46000.078*
H7C0.47880.16430.65790.078*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0502 (7)0.0478 (7)0.0911 (10)0.0036 (5)0.0388 (7)0.0059 (6)
O20.0699 (9)0.0400 (8)0.1009 (11)0.0114 (6)0.0427 (8)0.0001 (6)
N10.0415 (7)0.0302 (7)0.0561 (8)0.0016 (5)0.0203 (6)0.0013 (5)
C20.0359 (7)0.0346 (8)0.0399 (7)0.0025 (6)0.0112 (6)0.0013 (6)
C30.0361 (8)0.0335 (8)0.0389 (8)0.0020 (6)0.0117 (6)0.0003 (5)
C40.0451 (8)0.0303 (7)0.0455 (8)0.0036 (6)0.0164 (7)0.0003 (6)
C50.0399 (8)0.0366 (8)0.0491 (8)0.0030 (6)0.0162 (6)0.0033 (6)
C10.0532 (10)0.0368 (9)0.0721 (11)0.0095 (7)0.0236 (8)0.0013 (7)
C60.0433 (8)0.0418 (9)0.0426 (8)0.0033 (7)0.0137 (6)0.0002 (6)
C70.0403 (9)0.0604 (11)0.0589 (10)0.0007 (7)0.0204 (7)0.0018 (8)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
O1—C51.2255 (18)C4—H4A0.9700
O2—C61.222 (2)C4—H4B0.9700
N1—C51.3583 (19)C1—H1A0.9600
N1—C21.3963 (19)C1—H1B0.9600
N1—H10.8600C1—H1C0.9600
C2—C31.359 (2)C6—C71.504 (2)
C2—C11.490 (2)C7—H7A0.9600
C3—C61.459 (2)C7—H7B0.9600
C3—C41.5097 (19)C7—H7C0.9600
C3—C41.511 (2)
C5—N1—C2112.43 (12)N1—C5—C4106.53 (12)
C5—N1—H1123.8C2—C1—H1A109.5
C2—N1—H1123.8C2—C1—H1B109.5
C3—C2—N1109.47 (12)H1A—C1—H1B109.5
C3—C2—C1134.51 (14)C2—C1—H1C109.5
N1—C2—C1116.02 (13)H1A—C1—H1C109.5
C2—C3—C6130.91 (14)H1B—C1—H1C109.5
C2—C3—C4108.33 (12)O2—C6—C3118.83 (15)
C6—C3—C4120.68 (13)O2—C6—C7119.82 (14)
C3—C4—C5103.21 (12)C3—C6—C7121.35 (14)
C3—C4—H4A111.1C6—C7—H7A109.5
C5—C4—H4A111.1C6—C7—H7B109.5
C3—C4—H4B111.1H7A—C7—H7B109.5
C5—C4—H4B111.1C6—C7—H7C109.5
H4A—C4—H4B109.1H7A—C7—H7C109.5
O1—C5—N1124.12 (14)H7B—C7—H7C109.5
O1—C5—C4129.35 (14)
C5—N1—C2—C31.20 (18)C2—N1—C5—O1177.71 (14)
C5—N1—C2—C1178.13 (13)C2—N1—C5—C41.70 (17)
N1—C2—C3—C6176.86 (14)C3—C4—C5—O1177.87 (16)
C1—C2—C3—C62.3 (3)C3—C4—C5—N11.49 (15)
N1—C2—C3—C40.13 (16)C2—C3—C6—O2174.52 (17)
C1—C2—C3—C4179.03 (17)C4—C3—C6—O21.9 (2)
C2—C3—C4—C50.82 (15)C2—C3—C6—C74.3 (2)
C6—C3—C4—C5176.30 (13)C4—C3—C6—C7179.34 (13)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1···O1i0.861.982.819 (2)166
Symmetry code: (i) x, y1/2, z+3/2.

Experimental details

(I)(II)
Crystal data
Chemical formulaC7H9NO3C7H9NO2
Mr155.15139.15
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/cMonoclinic, P21/c
Temperature (K)291291
a, b, c (Å)12.377 (3), 7.562 (2), 7.880 (2)12.1211 (18), 7.5078 (11), 7.9542 (12)
β (°) 91.509 (3) 106.740 (2)
V3)737.4 (3)693.18 (18)
Z44
Radiation typeMo KαMo Kα
µ (mm1)0.110.10
Crystal size (mm)0.36 × 0.32 × 0.230.47 × 0.29 × 0.24
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker SMART CCD area-detector
diffractometer
Bruker SMART CCD area-detector
diffractometer
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)
Multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)
Tmin, Tmax0.958, 0.9750.954, 0.977
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
5325, 1371, 1095 4420, 1289, 1150
Rint0.0450.013
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.6060.606
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.048, 0.142, 1.31 0.039, 0.124, 1.08
No. of reflections13711289
No. of parameters10294
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrainedH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.24, 0.240.23, 0.17

Computer programs: SMART (Bruker, 1997), SMART, SAINT (Bruker, 1997), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997a), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997a), SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 1997b), SHELXTL.

Selected bond and torsion angles (º) for (I) top
C5—N1—C2112.74 (14)C3—C4—C5103.09 (14)
C3—C2—C1133.14 (17)O1—C5—N1124.57 (16)
N1—C2—C1117.68 (15)O1—C5—C4129.27 (15)
C2—C3—C6130.69 (16)N1—C5—C4106.16 (14)
C6—C3—C4120.47 (15)
C5—N1—C2—C31.4 (2)C3—C4—C5—O1177.99 (18)
C5—N1—C2—C1178.83 (15)C7—O3—C6—O20.9 (2)
N1—C2—C3—C6177.45 (15)C2—C3—C6—O2176.11 (17)
N1—C2—C3—C40.10 (19)C4—C3—C6—O21.0 (2)
C2—C3—C4—C51.00 (16)C4—C3—C6—O3179.34 (14)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) for (I) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1···O1i0.861.992.832 (2)167.6
Symmetry code: (i) x+2, y1/2, z+5/2.
Selected geometric parameters (Å, º) for (II) top
O1—C51.2255 (18)
C5—N1—C2112.43 (12)C6—C3—C4120.68 (13)
C3—C2—C1134.51 (14)C3—C4—C5103.21 (12)
N1—C2—C1116.02 (13)O1—C5—N1124.12 (14)
C2—C3—C6130.91 (14)O1—C5—C4129.35 (14)
C5—N1—C2—C31.20 (18)C2—C3—C4—C50.82 (15)
C5—N1—C2—C1178.13 (13)C3—C4—C5—O1177.87 (16)
N1—C2—C3—C6176.86 (14)C3—C4—C5—N11.49 (15)
N1—C2—C3—C40.13 (16)C2—C3—C6—O2174.52 (17)
C1—C2—C3—C4179.03 (17)C4—C3—C6—C7179.34 (13)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) for (II) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1···O1i0.861.982.819 (2)166.4
Symmetry code: (i) x, y1/2, z+3/2.
 

Follow Acta Cryst. C
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds