Download citation
Download citation
link to html
The X-ray crystal structure and hydrogen-bonding patterns of the title compound, C18H17N3O3·C5H5N, a non-N-alkyl­ated cyclotripeptide containing one α- and two β-amino acids, are reported. The amides in the 11-membered ring have an unprecedented all-transoid configuration. The torsion angles and Dunitz parameters describing non-planarity of the amides contained in the cyclotripeptide are discussed.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270106041242/ga3020sup1.cif
Contains datablocks I, New_Global_Publ_Block

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270106041242/ga3020Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

CCDC reference: 632936

Comment top

N-Alkylated cyclo-tripeptides have often been synthesized as structural models for β- and γ-turn mimetics (Wels et al., 2002; Schumann et al., 2000), interesting antibacterial effects (Hamuro et al., 1999) and for solution versus solid phase comparisons (Bats & Fuess, 1980). Synthesis of non-N-alkylated cyclotripeptides is extremely difficult as the preferred transoid conformation of amide bonds prevents unassisted ring closure. Most reported cyclotripeptides contain proline residues, which lower the energy difference between the cisoid and transoid conformations. Crystallographically characterized examples of cyclotripeptide ten-membered rings (2α and 1β; Cerrini et al., 1988; Rothe et al., 1973; Wels et al., 2002) and 12-membered rings (3β) are all N-alkylated (Ollis & Stoddart, 1984). We are not aware of any reported examples of cyclotripeptide 11-membered rings. Incorporation of α- and β-amino acids into a single medium-sized ring gives unique qualities that may not occur in cyclopeptides containing solely α- or β -amino acids. Syntheses of non-N-alkylated cyclotripeptides have only been reported twice (Imagawa et al., 1987; Villalgordo & Heimgartner, 1997); however, the compounds were never characterized crystallographically. These results do not exclude the possibility that the peptide precursors may have dimerized before cyclization, thus forming cyclohexapeptides (Schröder & Lübke, 1965).

In this communication, we report the first crystal structure determination of a non-N-alkylated cyclotripeptide containing all-transoid amides, (I) (Fig. 1). Two of the amides are significantly non-planar. This contrasts with previously reported crystal structures of N-alkylated cyclotripeptides where at least one of the amides is in a cisoid configuration. The all-transoid configuration in (I) could make it a good candidate for studies in β-turn mimetics (Wels et al., 2002). However, the torsion angles for the α-amino acid (Table 2) are closer to those of an α-helix than a β-sheet on a Ramachandran plot. Hence, this particular transoid cyclotripeptide is not the most suitable candidate for β-turn mimetic studies. The torsion angles (ϕ,ψ) of the β-amino acids (Table 2) do show similarities to the calculated preferred minimum energy conformations for β-peptides in an H12-helix configuration (Günther & Hofmann, 2001). The θ torsion angles for the β-peptides differ from the normally preferred minimums because the aromatic ring constrains this angle to be close to zero (Günther & Hofmann, 2001). The fixed torsion angles inside the 11-membered ring may allow such rings to be used as possible scaffolds in drug development (Ro et al., 2002). This approach has been attempted using other peptide systems whose torsion angles mimic those of bioactive molecules (Ro et al., 2002).

The primary hydrogen-bonding motif (Fig. 2 and Table 1) consists of hydrogen-bonded dimers using the N1—H1···O1 links between adjacent molecules. The N3 hydrogen (H3) is potentially available for an intermolecular hydrogen bond; however, it is not sterically accessible with the geminal dimethyl group and aromatic rings on both macrocycles prohibiting approach from this side of the molecule. It seems possible that the pyridine solvate prevents the formation of a hydrogen-bonded supramolecular structure by binding (Table 1) an H atom (H2) that is internal to the ring. This would not normally be available for hydrogen bonding to another neighbouring ring.

The ω angles (Winkler & Dunitz, 1971; Table 2) of the amide residues show that the H atoms of amides 2 and 3 lie out of their plane. Specifically, atom H2 is 0.229 (1) Å from the N2/C7/O1 plane and atom H3 is 0.207 (1) Å from the N3/C14/O2 plane. Amide non-planarity can arise from one of two possible distortions in the amide bond, which cannot be identified by the ω angle. The first distortion is from pyramidalization of the amide N atom or carbonyl C atom. The second distortion is from a twist of the amide C—N bond. A Dunitz analysis of amide non-planarity (Table 3) relates amide non-planarity to the precise distortion causing the non-planarity [τ is the non-planarity of the amide; for a planar trans-amide this should be close to 180°; χN and χC measure the angular pyramidalization of the amide N atom and carbonyl C atom, respectively]. The values of χN and χC suggest that the observed non-planarity for amide 2 (H2/N2/C7/O1) and amide 3 (H3/N3/C14/O2) is due to a twist in the amide bond, rather than pyramidalization of the N or carbonyl C atoms. Amide 1 (H1/N1/C16/O3) is relatively planar, with atom H1 0.079 (2) Å from the N1/C16/O3 plane.

Modelling (Spartan'04 Mechanics PC/x86 RB3LYP/6–311G*; Hehre, 2003; Kong et al., 2000) does predict that the all-trans system is favoured as the monomer by 22.5 kJ mol−1, and by 93.7 kJ mol−1 in the hydrogen-bonded dimer as the pyridine solvate. In the crystallographically determined hydrogen-bonded dimer (Fig. 2), the rings are equivalent because of a centre of symmetry. In the theoretical model for an isolated pyridine hydrogen-bonded dimer such as the one in Fig. 2, the two tripeptide rings contain different sets of torsion angles and different sources of amide non-planarity (Table 3). Dunitz analysis of the theoretical dimer system predicts amide non-planarity to be a combination of pyramidalization of the atoms and a twist of the amide bonds; this is in contrast to (I), which exhibits almost exclusive twisting of the amide bond. The (solid-state) hydrogen bonding (Table 1) here may also be affecting this distortion from planarity.

Amide non-planarity in (I) must help reduce the strain caused by having three rigorously transoid amides in the medium sized ring. Relieving ring strain through amide non-planarity has been seen in cyclotetrapeptides (with a 12-membered ring) such as dihydrochlamydocin, which also contains an all trans-configuration (Flippen & Karle, 1976). Dunitz analysis of dihydrochlamydocin indicates that there is a significant contribution from pyramidalization of the amide C or N atoms to the non-planarity, as opposed to a twist of the amide bond. To our knowledge, no other cyclotripeptide, containing α-amino acids, exhibits the all-trans configuration reported here. This leads us to believe that further study of this unusual structural type is warranted.

Experimental top

Compound (I) was synthesized using methods carried forward from Ollis & Stoddart (1984) and Imagawa et al. (1987). Dimethyl sulfoxide and dimethylformamide solvent systems were also attempted, but did not yield X-ray quality crystals. 2-[2-(2-Amino-benzoylamino)benzoylamino]-2-methylpropionic acid methyl ester (0.996 g, 0.0028 mol) was dissolved in freshly distilled tetrhydrofuran (THF, 25 ml), and sodium hydride 60% in mineral oil was added. The solution was refluxed for three days and then quenched in 150 ml of ice–cold water. The THF was distilled out of the solution at ambient pressure. The resulting cloudy solution was cooled and filtered. The isolated solid (0.600 g after air drying) is the macrocyclic product with 95–98% purity (crystallization from hot/cold pyridine). For other spectroscopic data, see the CIF.

Refinement top

H atoms were placed in calculated positions and refined using a riding model (C—H = = 0.93 and 0.96 Å, and N—H = 0.86 Å), with Uiso(H) values of 1.2 or 1.5 times Ueq(C,N).

Computing details top

Data collection: SMART (Siemens, 1995); cell refinement: SAINT (Siemens, 1995); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: ORTEPIII (Burnett & Johnson, 1996); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Siemens, 1995).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. ORTEPIII (Burnett & Johnson, 1996) diagram of the X-ray crystal structure of (I). Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level and non-amide H atoms have been omitted for clarity.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. Hydrogen bonding in (I). H atoms have been omitted for clarity. The two halves of the dimer are related by a crystallographic centre of symmetry [symmetry code: (*) 1 − x, 2 − y, −z.]
7,7-dimethyl-7,8-dihydro-5H-dibenzo[e,i][1,4,8] triazacycloundecine-6,9,15(14H)-trione pyridine solvate top
Crystal data top
C18H17N3O3·C5H5NF(000) = 848
Mr = 402.45Dx = 1.373 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 7879 reflections
a = 12.107 (2) Åθ = 1.7–26.4°
b = 11.050 (2) ŵ = 0.09 mm1
c = 14.627 (3) ÅT = 85 K
β = 92.42 (3)°Plate, colourless
V = 1955.1 (7) Å30.28 × 0.24 × 0.20 mm
Z = 4
Data collection top
Siemens SMART CCD area-detector
diffractometer
4001 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube3360 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.023
ω scansθmax = 26.4°, θmin = 1.7°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 1997)
h = 1515
Tmin = 0.757, Tmax = 0.978k = 013
11782 measured reflectionsl = 018
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.039Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.100H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.03 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0409P)2 + 1.2338P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
4001 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
273 parametersΔρmax = 0.53 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.52 e Å3
Crystal data top
C18H17N3O3·C5H5NV = 1955.1 (7) Å3
Mr = 402.45Z = 4
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation
a = 12.107 (2) ŵ = 0.09 mm1
b = 11.050 (2) ÅT = 85 K
c = 14.627 (3) Å0.28 × 0.24 × 0.20 mm
β = 92.42 (3)°
Data collection top
Siemens SMART CCD area-detector
diffractometer
4001 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 1997)
3360 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.757, Tmax = 0.978Rint = 0.023
11782 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0390 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.100H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.03Δρmax = 0.53 e Å3
4001 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.52 e Å3
273 parameters
Special details top

Experimental. 1H (d6dmso) 500 MHz: 9.52(1H, s, amideNH), 8.89(1H,s, amideNH), 8.72(1H, s, amide NH), 7,83(1H, d, ar, J=8.12 Hz), 7.731 (1H, d, ar, J=7.94 Hz), 7.56(1H, d, ar, J=7.55 Hz), 7.51(1H, t, ar, J= 7.44 Hz), 7.48(1H, t, ar, J=8.84 Hz), 7.60(1H, d, ar, J=7.39 Hz), 7.26(2H, q, ar, J=7.56 Hz), 1.53(6H, s, me)

13C{1H} (d6dmso) 500 MHz:172.7, 169.6, 166.3, 134.8, 134.3, 132.7, 130.6, 129.6, 129.3, 128.4, 124.9, 124.5, 124.48, 124.41, 124.2, 58.4, 24.6

HRMS(EI): M+= 323.1263 (2.2ppm), Calculated: 323.13

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O10.53265 (8)1.12612 (9)0.05641 (7)0.0184 (2)
O20.67481 (8)0.70289 (9)0.17448 (7)0.0186 (2)
O30.85282 (8)0.72607 (10)0.00508 (8)0.0223 (2)
N10.71062 (10)0.85908 (11)0.02253 (8)0.0158 (3)
N20.60747 (10)0.96591 (10)0.13562 (8)0.0151 (3)
N30.57187 (10)0.67927 (11)0.04178 (8)0.0152 (3)
N40.83737 (11)0.92499 (12)0.21275 (9)0.0225 (3)
C10.76725 (12)0.97150 (13)0.01692 (9)0.0159 (3)
C20.86623 (12)0.98911 (14)0.06011 (10)0.0190 (3)
C30.91613 (12)1.10250 (14)0.05964 (10)0.0210 (3)
C40.86600 (12)1.20021 (14)0.01859 (10)0.0206 (3)
C50.76625 (12)1.18424 (13)0.02342 (10)0.0183 (3)
C60.71765 (11)1.06969 (13)0.02656 (9)0.0155 (3)
C70.61073 (12)1.05716 (13)0.07404 (9)0.0149 (3)
C80.50821 (12)0.91686 (13)0.16945 (9)0.0149 (3)
C90.42532 (12)0.98943 (13)0.20229 (9)0.0167 (3)
C100.32818 (12)0.93700 (14)0.23067 (10)0.0190 (3)
C110.31384 (12)0.81246 (14)0.22702 (10)0.0213 (3)
C120.39735 (12)0.73920 (14)0.19474 (10)0.0192 (3)
C130.49450 (12)0.79044 (13)0.16592 (9)0.0155 (3)
C140.58844 (12)0.71779 (12)0.12915 (10)0.0149 (3)
C150.66584 (12)0.64399 (13)0.01414 (10)0.0164 (3)
C160.75467 (12)0.74617 (13)0.00838 (9)0.0160 (3)
C170.71618 (13)0.52423 (13)0.01832 (11)0.0205 (3)
C180.62069 (12)0.63123 (13)0.11292 (10)0.0192 (3)
C190.88451 (13)0.82911 (15)0.25446 (11)0.0250 (3)
C200.96838 (14)0.83802 (17)0.32092 (13)0.0328 (4)
C211.00587 (15)0.95127 (19)0.34694 (12)0.0371 (4)
C220.95917 (16)1.05184 (18)0.30446 (13)0.0355 (4)
C230.87673 (14)1.03392 (15)0.23785 (12)0.0289 (4)
H10.64090.86220.03640.019*
H20.66930.93550.15560.018*
H2A0.89920.92470.08950.023*
H30.50560.67520.01830.018*
H3A0.98341.11290.08700.025*
H40.89911.27620.01920.025*
H50.73171.25010.04960.022*
H90.43471.07290.20530.020*
H100.27240.98580.25230.023*
H110.24860.77800.24610.026*
H120.38790.65570.19250.023*
H17A0.74490.53270.08020.031*
H17B0.77500.50220.02040.031*
H17C0.66040.46240.01570.031*
H18A0.56560.56880.11620.029*
H18B0.67990.61040.15160.029*
H18C0.58830.70650.13290.029*
H190.85940.75240.23770.030*
H200.99910.76880.34770.039*
H211.06160.95980.39220.044*
H220.98271.12950.32040.043*
H230.84661.10170.20850.035*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C180.0226 (7)0.0178 (7)0.0173 (7)0.0009 (6)0.0006 (6)0.0031 (6)
O20.0191 (5)0.0174 (5)0.0192 (5)0.0009 (4)0.0018 (4)0.0005 (4)
O10.0174 (5)0.0164 (5)0.0214 (5)0.0031 (4)0.0010 (4)0.0028 (4)
O30.0168 (5)0.0207 (6)0.0294 (6)0.0027 (4)0.0007 (4)0.0001 (4)
N20.0151 (6)0.0140 (6)0.0160 (6)0.0012 (5)0.0003 (4)0.0017 (5)
N30.0139 (6)0.0150 (6)0.0167 (6)0.0008 (4)0.0003 (5)0.0004 (5)
N10.0131 (6)0.0146 (6)0.0198 (6)0.0004 (5)0.0002 (4)0.0009 (5)
C170.0224 (8)0.0150 (7)0.0242 (8)0.0025 (6)0.0016 (6)0.0002 (6)
N40.0204 (6)0.0232 (7)0.0239 (7)0.0031 (5)0.0019 (5)0.0009 (5)
C10.0170 (7)0.0150 (7)0.0154 (7)0.0002 (5)0.0023 (5)0.0028 (5)
C50.0212 (7)0.0145 (7)0.0190 (7)0.0004 (6)0.0004 (6)0.0014 (6)
C40.0207 (7)0.0183 (7)0.0225 (8)0.0049 (6)0.0016 (6)0.0035 (6)
C140.0183 (7)0.0099 (6)0.0166 (7)0.0028 (5)0.0022 (5)0.0022 (5)
C160.0179 (7)0.0168 (7)0.0136 (7)0.0016 (6)0.0027 (5)0.0013 (5)
C90.0207 (7)0.0162 (7)0.0130 (6)0.0010 (6)0.0004 (5)0.0005 (5)
C100.0189 (7)0.0237 (8)0.0146 (7)0.0034 (6)0.0024 (5)0.0011 (6)
C150.0176 (7)0.0148 (7)0.0169 (7)0.0015 (5)0.0020 (5)0.0008 (5)
C130.0187 (7)0.0164 (7)0.0114 (6)0.0010 (5)0.0004 (5)0.0011 (5)
C200.0230 (8)0.0368 (10)0.0381 (10)0.0037 (7)0.0055 (7)0.0165 (8)
C70.0172 (7)0.0133 (7)0.0142 (7)0.0013 (5)0.0010 (5)0.0020 (5)
C60.0150 (7)0.0160 (7)0.0154 (7)0.0001 (5)0.0019 (5)0.0023 (5)
C30.0149 (7)0.0263 (8)0.0219 (7)0.0014 (6)0.0016 (6)0.0045 (6)
C120.0217 (7)0.0171 (7)0.0189 (7)0.0021 (6)0.0014 (6)0.0013 (6)
C110.0186 (7)0.0263 (8)0.0192 (7)0.0034 (6)0.0041 (6)0.0021 (6)
C20.0177 (7)0.0193 (7)0.0201 (7)0.0016 (6)0.0010 (6)0.0017 (6)
C80.0173 (7)0.0166 (7)0.0108 (6)0.0011 (5)0.0008 (5)0.0013 (5)
C220.0388 (10)0.0347 (10)0.0330 (9)0.0095 (8)0.0016 (8)0.0058 (8)
C190.0206 (8)0.0246 (8)0.0296 (8)0.0005 (6)0.0007 (6)0.0053 (7)
C230.0314 (9)0.0237 (8)0.0316 (9)0.0035 (7)0.0016 (7)0.0004 (7)
C210.0291 (9)0.0526 (12)0.0287 (9)0.0146 (8)0.0071 (7)0.0075 (8)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
C18—C151.530 (2)C4—C31.388 (2)
C18—H18A0.9600C4—H40.9300
C18—H18B0.9600C14—C131.510 (2)
C18—H18C0.9600C16—C151.559 (2)
O2—C141.2255 (18)C9—C81.386 (2)
O1—C71.2330 (17)C9—C101.390 (2)
O3—C161.2167 (18)C9—H90.9300
N2—C71.3537 (18)C10—C111.388 (2)
N2—C81.4258 (18)C10—H100.9300
N2—H20.8600C13—C121.387 (2)
N3—C141.3538 (18)C13—C81.407 (2)
N3—C151.4811 (18)C20—C211.379 (3)
N3—H30.8600C20—C191.379 (2)
N1—C161.3691 (19)C20—H200.9300
N1—C11.4196 (18)C7—C61.5011 (19)
N1—H10.8600C3—C21.391 (2)
C17—C151.524 (2)C3—H3A0.9300
C17—H17A0.9600C12—C111.393 (2)
C17—H17B0.9600C12—H120.9300
C17—H17C0.9600C11—H110.9300
N4—C191.338 (2)C2—H2A0.9300
N4—C231.340 (2)C22—C231.379 (3)
C1—C21.392 (2)C22—C211.382 (3)
C1—C61.405 (2)C22—H220.9300
C5—C41.389 (2)C19—H190.9300
C5—C61.397 (2)C23—H230.9300
C5—H50.9300C21—H210.9300
C15—C18—H18A109.5N3—C15—C18107.08 (12)
C15—C18—H18B109.5C17—C15—C18109.66 (12)
H18A—C18—H18B109.5N3—C15—C16108.89 (11)
C15—C18—H18C109.5C17—C15—C16110.24 (12)
H18A—C18—H18C109.5C18—C15—C16109.64 (12)
H18B—C18—H18C109.5C12—C13—C8119.62 (13)
C7—N2—C8124.24 (12)C12—C13—C14123.55 (13)
C7—N2—H2117.9C8—C13—C14116.83 (12)
C8—N2—H2117.9C21—C20—C19118.90 (16)
C14—N3—C15121.15 (12)C21—C20—H20120.6
C14—N3—H3119.4C19—C20—H20120.6
C15—N3—H3119.4O1—C7—N2123.77 (13)
C16—N1—C1127.19 (12)O1—C7—C6120.99 (13)
C16—N1—H1116.4N2—C7—C6115.24 (12)
C1—N1—H1116.4C5—C6—C1119.73 (13)
C15—C17—H17A109.5C5—C6—C7118.12 (13)
C15—C17—H17B109.5C1—C6—C7122.11 (13)
H17A—C17—H17B109.5C4—C3—C2120.35 (14)
C15—C17—H17C109.5C4—C3—H3A119.8
H17A—C17—H17C109.5C2—C3—H3A119.8
H17B—C17—H17C109.5C13—C12—C11120.18 (14)
C19—N4—C23116.50 (14)C13—C12—H12119.9
C2—C1—C6119.35 (13)C11—C12—H12119.9
C2—C1—N1121.27 (13)C10—C11—C12119.86 (14)
C6—C1—N1119.16 (13)C10—C11—H11120.1
C4—C5—C6120.32 (14)C12—C11—H11120.1
C4—C5—H5119.8C3—C2—C1120.39 (14)
C6—C5—H5119.8C3—C2—H2A119.8
C3—C4—C5119.79 (14)C1—C2—H2A119.8
C3—C4—H4120.1C9—C8—C13120.06 (13)
C5—C4—H4120.1C9—C8—N2122.25 (13)
O2—C14—N3123.89 (13)C13—C8—N2117.66 (12)
O2—C14—C13121.14 (13)C23—C22—C21118.17 (17)
N3—C14—C13114.81 (12)C23—C22—H22120.9
O3—C16—N1124.22 (13)C21—C22—H22120.9
O3—C16—C15122.91 (13)N4—C19—C20123.50 (16)
N1—C16—C15112.85 (12)N4—C19—H19118.3
C8—C9—C10119.76 (14)C20—C19—H19118.3
C8—C9—H9120.1N4—C23—C22124.12 (16)
C10—C9—H9120.1N4—C23—H23117.9
C11—C10—C9120.52 (14)C22—C23—H23117.9
C11—C10—H10119.7C20—C21—C22118.80 (16)
C9—C10—H10119.7C20—C21—H21120.6
N3—C15—C17111.27 (12)C22—C21—H21120.6

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC18H17N3O3·C5H5N
Mr402.45
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/c
Temperature (K)85
a, b, c (Å)12.107 (2), 11.050 (2), 14.627 (3)
β (°) 92.42 (3)
V3)1955.1 (7)
Z4
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)0.09
Crystal size (mm)0.28 × 0.24 × 0.20
Data collection
DiffractometerSiemens SMART CCD area-detector
diffractometer
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 1997)
Tmin, Tmax0.757, 0.978
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
11782, 4001, 3360
Rint0.023
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.626
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.039, 0.100, 1.03
No. of reflections4001
No. of parameters273
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.53, 0.52

Computer programs: SMART (Siemens, 1995), SAINT (Siemens, 1995), SAINT, SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), ORTEPIII (Burnett & Johnson, 1996), SHELXTL (Siemens, 1995).

&unitsp; top
Hydrogen-bond geometries (Å, °) for (I). [Symmetry code: (*) 1 − x, 2 − y, −z]
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1···O1*0.862.112.9705 (17)174
N2—H2···N40.862.172.9932 (19)160
&unitsp; top
Torsion angles (°) for amino acids in (I). Angles are as defined by Winkler & Dunitz (1971).
Torsion Anglesϕψθω
β1-137.37 (15)51.62 (19)5.03 (19)-162.12 (12)
β2128.95 (15)-102.10 (15)1.90 (19)159.46 (12)
α1-49.99 (17)-47.82 (16)NA176.19 (13)
&unitsp; top
Dunitz parameters (°) for the amide bonds in (I) and for theoretical calculations (see text). Angles are as defined by Winkler & Dunitz (1971). H atoms are in calculated positions.
Crystal data1Theoretical data2
BondN1N2N3N1aN2aN3aN1bN2bN3b
τ175.3-162.3161.7-170.9174.3178.4-164.0180.2168.4
χN0.00.00.0-15.85.826.08.010.78.7
χC1.70.4-4.5-0.91.55.93.03.9-0.9
1 Both halves of the hydrogen-bonded dimer are crystallographically equivalent. 2 Theory predicts non-equivalent halves of the hydrogen-bonded dimer. These are labelled a and b, respectively.
 

Follow Acta Cryst. C
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds