Download citation
Download citation
link to html
The natural compound dendocarbin A, C15H22O3, is a sesqui­terpene lactone isolated for the first time from Drimys winteri for var chilensis. The compound crystallizes in the ortho­rhom­bic space group P212121 and its X-ray crystal structure confirmed the S/R character of the chiral centres at C-5/C-10 and C-9/C-11, respectively. The α-OH group at C-11 was found to be involved in inter­molecular hydrogen bonding, defining chains along the <100> 21 screw axis.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S205322961402155X/dt3028sup1.cif
Contains datablock I

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S205322961402155X/dt3028Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

CCDC reference: 1026724

Introduction top

Drimys winteri (Winter­aceae) is a native tree of Chile, sacred for the native people (Araucanian) due to its medicinal properties, such us bactericidal, anti­fungal and insecticidal (Kubo et al., 2005; Jansen & de Groot, 2004). The main secondary metabolites in its barks are drimane sesquiterpenoids which have been described by Appel et al. (1963). On the other hand, the main scope of the present report, the natural compound dendocarbin A, (I), even if not novel, has been treated only tangentially in the literature. It had originally been obtained from ethanol extracts of the Japanese udibranch Dendrodoris carbunculosa by Sakio et al. (2001), who found cytotoxic activity in its extracts and molecules. A few years later, Gaspar et al. (2005), reported the first chemical study of the porostome nudibranch Doriopsilla pelseneeri collected off the Portuguese coast, finding in his case the secondary metabolite. Finally, Xu et al. (2009) reported compound (I) as being isolated from the ethyl acetate extract of Warburgia ugandensis (Canellaceae) barks.

The present work is part of a series of structural characterizations of naturally occurring molecules isolated from southern Andean flora (a seemingly inextinguishable source for extractive chemists). We describe herein the crystal structure of (I), isolated for the first time from Drimys winteri var chilensis (Winter­aceae), in order to ascertain unambiguously the relative stereochemistry of the OH group at C-11 and the methyl group at C-15, as well as to confirm the relative configurations of the remaining asymmetric centres.

Experimental top

Synthesis and crystallization top

Compound (I) was isolated from the stem bark of Drimys winteri (Canelo) collected in Concepcion, VIII Region of Chile, in February 2012. The bark (1 kg) was powdered and extracted by maceration with ethanol for 3 d, giving a crude product (20 g) which was further purified by column chromatography. Compound (I) afforded as a white solid from hexane/ethyl acetate (1:1 v/v) and this was recrystallized from methanol producing colourless crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction analysis.

Refinement top

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 1. All H atoms were identified in an inter­mediate difference map, and treated differently in the refinement. H atoms on C atoms were idealized and allowed to ride both in coordinates as in displacement factors, the latter taken as Uiso(H) = xUeq(C), with C—H = 0.93 Å and x = 1.2 for aromatic, C—H = 0.97 Å and x = 1.2 for methyl­ene and C—H = 0.96 Å and x = 1.5 for methyl groups. The hy­droxy H atom was refined freely. The combined effect of weak diffractors and a medium quality data set precluded a trustable determination of the configuration of the chiral centers, even if a weak suggestion for the one herein presented was obatined from refinement [Flack parameters = 0.3 (8) and -0.7 (8) for the reported and inverted configurations, respectively]. The present `handness', however, defined by C5(S), C9(R), C10(S), C11(R), was found to coincide with that reported in (IV), in turn assigned by similarity with related compounds.

Results and discussion top

The molecule of (I) (Fig. 1) is characterized by a rigid backbone made out of three fused rings (see Scheme for labelling), where lateral ring A (atoms C1–C5/C10) has a chair conformation [θ = 6.1 (4)°; cf. θ = 0.00° for an ideal chair (Boeyens, 1978)], central ring B (atoms C5–C10) has a half-chair conformation [θ = 52.8 (3)° and ϕ = 321.5 (5)° = 5 × 60 + 21.5°; cf. θ = 50.8 and ϕ = k × 60 + 30° for an ideal half-chair (Boeyens, 1978)] and five-membered lactone ring C (atoms C8/C9/C11/C12/O3) has an envelope conformation [ϕ = 63.7 (6)° = 2 × 36 - 8.3°; cf. ϕ = k × 36 + 0° for anideal envelope (Cremer & Pople, 1975)], with the carbonyl group at atom C12 conjugated with the C7C8 double bond. It is worth mentioning that this envelope geometry for the lactone ring is favoured by the `outer' position of the double bond; when the location is instead `inner' (C8C9), the group is strictly planar, with mean deviations from planarity smaller than 0.02 Å (see, for example, Nicotra et al., 2006; Qian & Zhao, 2012; von Nussbaum et al., 2012)

A search in the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD, Version 5.34; Allen, 2002) disclosed that the structure is closely related to three analogues, viz. the disteromer lactone drimenin, (II) (CSD refcode DIWSEI; Brito, López-Rodríguez et al., 2008), cinnamolide, (III) (CSD refcode UTONUN; Brito, Cardenas et al. 2008) and 3-hy­droxy-7-drimen-12,11-olide hemihydrate, (IV) (CSD refcode UCOKUT; Zhang et al., 2006) (see Scheme). All four structures are, as expected, quite similar and and Table 2 provides a comparison of corresponding parameters highlighting the most noticeable differences, while Fig. 2 presents, in turn, a superposition of all four molecules, where the almost identical rings A, unaffected by the differing locations of the carbonyl group, have been used for the least-squares fitting.

The most relevant differences regarding bond distances or angles are to be found around the lactone O3 atom, and have to do precisely with the position of the carbonyl group [C12O2 in (I), (III) and (IV), and C11O1 in (II)]. In all cases, the CO presents a clear resonance with the neighbouring C12—O3 (C11—O3) group, which is sensibly shorter than its C11—O3 (C12—O3) neighbour (see Table 2). On the other hand, the identical lactone rings in (III) and (IV) appear rather parallel to each other, even if slightly offset. The inclusion of an O atom at C11, either single bonded as in (I) or double bonded as in (II), tends to twist the group, as shown in Fig. 2 and can be assessed by the difference in the torsion angles presented in Table 2.

Regarding the supra­molecular structure, there are two significant inter­molecular inter­actions in (I) (entries 1 and 2 in Table 3). These hydrogen bonds generate R22(7) loops (for graph-set nomenclature, see Bernstein et al., 1995) connecting neighbouring molecules along the rather short a direction, riding on a twofold screw. This generates a one-dimensional substructure threaded by the symmetry axis (Fig. 3). In these chains, molecules are not stacked alongside, but laterally, for what both inter­actions have extremely short repetition codes, viz. C(6) for the O—H···O and C(3) for the C—H···O hydrogen bonds.

On the other side, these <100> chains are poorly inter­acting, the only mentionable link being an extremely weak C—H···O contact (presented as entry 3 in Table 3 and drawn as dotted lines in Fig. 4), by way of which the parallel chains end up forming a weakly bound three-dimensional structure. By comparison, structures (II) and (III), which do not have any active hydro­hen-bond donor, present absolutely non-inter­acting molecules just sustained by van der Waals forces. Compound (IV), instead, presents a comparable display of inter­molecular inter­actions, through the OH groups in the two independent moieties, as well as an active water solvate, giving rise to tightly bound two-dimensional substructures of justaposed chains. In spite of the obvious differences due to the different OH position and the presence of the water solvate in (IV), the way in which chains are formed is similar, threaded along a 21 axis.

Related literature top

For related literature, see: Allen (2002); Appel et al. (1963); Bernstein et al. (1995); Boeyens (1978); Brito, Cardenas, Zarraga, Paz, Perez & Lopez-Rodrıguez (2008); Brito, López-Rodríguez, Zárraga, Paz & Pérez (2008); Cremer & Pople (1975); Gaspar et al. (2005); Jansen & de Groot (2004); Kubo et al. (2005); Nicotra et al. (2006); Nussbaum et al. (2012); Qian & Zhao (2012); Sakio et al. (2001); Xu et al. (2009); Zhang et al. (2006).

Computing details top

Data collection: CrysAlis PRO (Oxford Diffraction, 2009); cell refinement: CrysAlis PRO (Oxford Diffraction, 2009); data reduction: CrysAlis PRO (Oxford Diffraction, 2009); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL2013 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: XP in SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL2013 (Sheldrick, 2008) and PLATON (Spek, 2009).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. Ellipsoid plot of (I), with displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 30% probability level.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. Superposition of the structures of (I), (II), (III) and (IV).
[Figure 3] Fig. 3. A view of the hydrogen-bonded chain in (I), with the hydrogen bonds drawn as broken lines. Hashes (#) indicate hydrogen bonds included in Table 3. [Symmetry code: (i) x+1/2, -y+3/2, -z+1.]
[Figure 4] Fig. 4. Packing view of (I) along a, the chain direction, showing the latter in projection and in broken/dotted lines the intra/inter chain hydrogen bonds. Hashes (#) indicate hydrogen bonds included in Table 3.
(1R,5aS,9aS,9bR)-5,5a,6,7,8,9,9a,9b-Octahydro-1-hydroxy-6,6,9a-trimethylnaphtho[1,2-c]furan-3(1H)-one top
Crystal data top
C15H22O3Dx = 1.179 Mg m3
Mr = 250.32Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71069 Å
Orthorhombic, P212121Cell parameters from 2073 reflections
a = 6.335 (4) Åθ = 3.9–21.5°
b = 13.399 (5) ŵ = 0.08 mm1
c = 16.613 (5) ÅT = 295 K
V = 1410.2 (11) Å3Block, colourless
Z = 40.35 × 0.25 × 0.20 mm
F(000) = 544
Data collection top
Oxford Diffraction Gemini CCD S Ultra
diffractometer
2059 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
ω scans, thick slicesRint = 0.044
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(CrysAlis PRO; Oxford Diffraction, 2009)
θmax = 29.2°, θmin = 3.8°
Tmin = 0.91, Tmax = 0.94h = 88
12609 measured reflectionsk = 1817
3411 independent reflectionsl = 2218
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Hydrogen site location: mixed
Least-squares matrix: fullH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.055 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0532P)2 + 0.1546P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
wR(F2) = 0.133(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
S = 0.99Δρmax = 0.13 e Å3
3411 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.16 e Å3
170 parametersAbsolute structure: Flack x determined using 627 quotients [(I+)-(I-)]/[(I+)+(I-)] (Parsons & Flack, 2004)
0 restraintsAbsolute structure parameter: 0.3 (8)
Crystal data top
C15H22O3V = 1410.2 (11) Å3
Mr = 250.32Z = 4
Orthorhombic, P212121Mo Kα radiation
a = 6.335 (4) ŵ = 0.08 mm1
b = 13.399 (5) ÅT = 295 K
c = 16.613 (5) Å0.35 × 0.25 × 0.20 mm
Data collection top
Oxford Diffraction Gemini CCD S Ultra
diffractometer
3411 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(CrysAlis PRO; Oxford Diffraction, 2009)
2059 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.91, Tmax = 0.94Rint = 0.044
12609 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.055H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.133Δρmax = 0.13 e Å3
S = 0.99Δρmin = 0.16 e Å3
3411 reflectionsAbsolute structure: Flack x determined using 627 quotients [(I+)-(I-)]/[(I+)+(I-)] (Parsons & Flack, 2004)
170 parametersAbsolute structure parameter: 0.3 (8)
0 restraints
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O10.0934 (4)0.64026 (17)0.40375 (15)0.0712 (7)
H1O0.158 (7)0.616 (3)0.451 (3)0.110 (15)*
O20.1961 (4)0.93607 (18)0.45904 (13)0.0734 (7)
O30.0232 (4)0.79121 (17)0.45638 (11)0.0655 (6)
C10.3357 (7)0.6921 (3)0.2291 (2)0.0815 (11)
H1A0.20050.66370.21410.098*
H1B0.39700.64960.27010.098*
C20.4797 (8)0.6918 (3)0.1556 (2)0.1016 (15)
H2A0.61980.71410.17080.122*
H2B0.49110.62450.13440.122*
C30.3901 (7)0.7605 (3)0.0918 (2)0.0838 (12)
H3A0.25400.73480.07490.101*
H3B0.48290.75920.04530.101*
C40.3626 (5)0.8683 (3)0.11857 (18)0.0576 (8)
C50.2292 (4)0.8690 (2)0.19758 (16)0.0466 (7)
H50.08930.84540.18110.056*
C60.1905 (6)0.9740 (2)0.23063 (19)0.0666 (9)
H6A0.32541.00640.23970.080*
H6B0.11421.01270.19080.080*
C70.0686 (6)0.9739 (3)0.3072 (2)0.0656 (9)
H70.01951.03400.32800.079*
C80.0286 (4)0.8903 (2)0.34624 (17)0.0487 (7)
C90.1088 (4)0.7899 (2)0.32286 (16)0.0443 (7)
H90.00560.75510.29470.053*
C100.2986 (4)0.7955 (2)0.26493 (17)0.0467 (7)
C110.1352 (5)0.7406 (2)0.40490 (17)0.0531 (8)
H110.27770.75260.42570.064*
C120.0772 (5)0.8798 (3)0.42476 (18)0.0557 (8)
C130.5800 (6)0.9193 (4)0.1250 (3)0.0924 (14)
H13A0.64520.92130.07290.139*
H13B0.66790.88230.16150.139*
H13C0.56240.98610.14480.139*
C140.2401 (7)0.9234 (3)0.0522 (2)0.0823 (12)
H14A0.30990.91400.00150.124*
H14B0.23470.99340.06450.124*
H14C0.09910.89740.04910.124*
C150.4940 (5)0.8312 (3)0.3109 (2)0.0809 (12)
H15A0.53420.78170.34970.121*
H15B0.46240.89270.33790.121*
H15C0.60800.84170.27370.121*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0958 (18)0.0539 (15)0.0640 (15)0.0100 (13)0.0033 (13)0.0134 (11)
O20.0826 (16)0.0779 (17)0.0596 (14)0.0063 (14)0.0100 (13)0.0122 (12)
O30.0768 (15)0.0693 (15)0.0505 (11)0.0004 (13)0.0082 (12)0.0064 (11)
C10.109 (3)0.057 (2)0.078 (2)0.025 (2)0.027 (2)0.0098 (19)
C20.138 (4)0.076 (3)0.090 (3)0.042 (3)0.043 (3)0.011 (2)
C30.109 (3)0.079 (3)0.063 (2)0.014 (2)0.026 (2)0.001 (2)
C40.0609 (19)0.062 (2)0.0501 (18)0.0001 (17)0.0052 (15)0.0069 (15)
C50.0444 (15)0.0480 (17)0.0474 (15)0.0025 (13)0.0077 (13)0.0048 (13)
C60.092 (2)0.0468 (19)0.0613 (19)0.0037 (18)0.006 (2)0.0084 (16)
C70.085 (2)0.0519 (19)0.0599 (19)0.0117 (18)0.0048 (19)0.0014 (16)
C80.0470 (15)0.0538 (19)0.0454 (16)0.0022 (14)0.0067 (13)0.0007 (13)
C90.0423 (14)0.0458 (17)0.0447 (15)0.0053 (13)0.0080 (13)0.0007 (12)
C100.0395 (14)0.0495 (17)0.0509 (15)0.0020 (14)0.0041 (13)0.0084 (13)
C110.0567 (18)0.0507 (19)0.0520 (17)0.0047 (15)0.0037 (14)0.0071 (14)
C120.0528 (18)0.063 (2)0.0508 (18)0.0056 (16)0.0020 (15)0.0073 (16)
C130.072 (2)0.120 (4)0.086 (3)0.017 (2)0.015 (2)0.026 (2)
C140.097 (3)0.096 (3)0.053 (2)0.008 (2)0.003 (2)0.0171 (19)
C150.0415 (17)0.126 (3)0.075 (2)0.010 (2)0.0164 (17)0.026 (2)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
O1—C111.370 (4)C6—C71.489 (5)
O1—H1O0.94 (4)C6—H6A0.9700
O2—C121.208 (4)C6—H6B0.9700
O3—C121.343 (4)C7—C81.319 (4)
O3—C111.483 (4)C7—H70.9300
C1—C101.526 (4)C8—C121.473 (4)
C1—C21.524 (5)C8—C91.489 (4)
C1—H1A0.9700C9—C111.524 (4)
C1—H1B0.9700C9—C101.542 (4)
C2—C31.515 (5)C9—H90.9800
C2—H2A0.9700C10—C151.531 (4)
C2—H2B0.9700C11—H110.9800
C3—C41.521 (5)C13—H13A0.9600
C3—H3A0.9700C13—H13B0.9600
C3—H3B0.9700C13—H13C0.9600
C4—C141.538 (5)C14—H14A0.9600
C4—C131.542 (5)C14—H14B0.9600
C4—C51.561 (4)C14—H14C0.9600
C5—C61.530 (4)C15—H15A0.9600
C5—C101.554 (4)C15—H15B0.9600
C5—H50.9800C15—H15C0.9600
C11—O1—H1O104 (3)C7—C8—C9125.0 (3)
C12—O3—C11110.6 (2)C12—C8—C9107.5 (3)
C10—C1—C2114.1 (3)C8—C9—C11101.3 (2)
C10—C1—H1A108.7C8—C9—C10112.6 (2)
C2—C1—H1A108.7C11—C9—C10119.6 (2)
C10—C1—H1B108.7C8—C9—H9107.6
C2—C1—H1B108.7C11—C9—H9107.6
H1A—C1—H1B107.6C10—C9—H9107.6
C3—C2—C1109.6 (3)C1—C10—C15110.7 (3)
C3—C2—H2A109.8C1—C10—C9108.6 (2)
C1—C2—H2A109.8C15—C10—C9109.6 (2)
C3—C2—H2B109.8C1—C10—C5109.8 (2)
C1—C2—H2B109.8C15—C10—C5112.9 (3)
H2A—C2—H2B108.2C9—C10—C5105.0 (2)
C2—C3—C4114.5 (3)O1—C11—O3109.1 (2)
C2—C3—H3A108.6O1—C11—C9113.1 (3)
C4—C3—H3A108.6O3—C11—C9104.1 (2)
C2—C3—H3B108.6O1—C11—H11110.2
C4—C3—H3B108.6O3—C11—H11110.2
H3A—C3—H3B107.6C9—C11—H11110.2
C3—C4—C14107.7 (3)O2—C12—O3121.7 (3)
C3—C4—C13109.8 (3)O2—C12—C8129.9 (3)
C14—C4—C13106.7 (3)O3—C12—C8108.3 (3)
C3—C4—C5108.3 (3)C4—C13—H13A109.5
C14—C4—C5109.1 (3)C4—C13—H13B109.5
C13—C4—C5115.0 (3)H13A—C13—H13B109.5
C6—C5—C10111.7 (2)C4—C13—H13C109.5
C6—C5—C4113.2 (2)H13A—C13—H13C109.5
C10—C5—C4116.6 (2)H13B—C13—H13C109.5
C6—C5—H5104.6C4—C14—H14A109.5
C10—C5—H5104.6C4—C14—H14B109.5
C4—C5—H5104.6H14A—C14—H14B109.5
C7—C6—C5112.9 (3)C4—C14—H14C109.5
C7—C6—H6A109.0H14A—C14—H14C109.5
C5—C6—H6A109.0H14B—C14—H14C109.5
C7—C6—H6B109.0C10—C15—H15A109.5
C5—C6—H6B109.0C10—C15—H15B109.5
H6A—C6—H6B107.8H15A—C15—H15B109.5
C8—C7—C6121.4 (3)C10—C15—H15C109.5
C8—C7—H7119.3H15A—C15—H15C109.5
C6—C7—H7119.3H15B—C15—H15C109.5
C7—C8—C12127.1 (3)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1—H1O···O2i0.94 (4)1.89 (5)2.832 (4)176 (4)
C11—H11···O3i0.982.403.190 (4)137
C6—H6B···O1ii0.972.673.630 (4)172
Symmetry codes: (i) x+1/2, y+3/2, z+1; (ii) x, y+1/2, z+1/2.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC15H22O3
Mr250.32
Crystal system, space groupOrthorhombic, P212121
Temperature (K)295
a, b, c (Å)6.335 (4), 13.399 (5), 16.613 (5)
V3)1410.2 (11)
Z4
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)0.08
Crystal size (mm)0.35 × 0.25 × 0.20
Data collection
DiffractometerOxford Diffraction Gemini CCD S Ultra
diffractometer
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(CrysAlis PRO; Oxford Diffraction, 2009)
Tmin, Tmax0.91, 0.94
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
12609, 3411, 2059
Rint0.044
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.687
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.055, 0.133, 0.99
No. of reflections3411
No. of parameters170
H-atom treatmentH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.13, 0.16
Absolute structureFlack x determined using 627 quotients [(I+)-(I-)]/[(I+)+(I-)] (Parsons & Flack, 2004)
Absolute structure parameter0.3 (8)

Computer programs: CrysAlis PRO (Oxford Diffraction, 2009), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), XP in SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL2013 (Sheldrick, 2008) and PLATON (Spek, 2009).

Comparison of the corresponding parameters in (I), (II), (III) and (IV) (Å, °). top
(I) (This work)(II) (DIWSEI)(III) (UTONUN)(IV) (UCOKUT)
O3—C121.338 (5)1.449 (4)1.345 (5)1.358 (3)
O3—C111.483 (4)1.348 (4)1.453 (5)1.467 (2)
O2—C121.207 (5)1.202 (5)1.204 (2)
O1—C111.370 (4)1.199 (3)
O3—C11—C9104.0 (2)110.3 (2)106.0 (2)105.47 (14)
O3—C12—C8108.4 (3)104.1 (2)108.9 (3)108.44 (16)
O3—C11—O1109.5 (3)120.3 (3)
O1—C11—C9112.0 (3)129.3 (3)
C7—C8—C12—O3-158.6 (3)-150.1 (3)-161.5 (3)-164.7 (2)
C8—C9—C11—O327.9 (3)15.4 (3)22.2 (3)23.8 (2)
C10—C9—C11—O3152.2 (2)140.3 (2)145.3 (3)147.30 (17)
C9—C8—C12—O314.3 (3)23.0 (3)10.0 (4)9.3 (3)
C8—C9—C11—O1146.0 (3)-166.2 (3)
C12—O3—C11—O1-141.2 (3)-179.9 (3)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1—H1O···O2i0.94 (4)1.89 (5)2.832 (4)176 (4)
C11—H11···O3i0.982.403.190 (4)137
C6—H6B···O1ii0.972.673.630 (4)172
Symmetry codes: (i) x+1/2, y+3/2, z+1; (ii) x, y+1/2, z+1/2.
 

Follow Acta Cryst. C
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds