Supporting information
Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807057911/dn2272sup1.cif | |
Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807057911/dn2272Isup2.hkl |
CCDC reference: 672957
Under nitrogen, a mixture of 2-bromobenzaldehyde (3.7 g, 20 mmol), Na2SO4 (3.0 g) and hydrazine (30% in water, 10 mmol) in absolute ethanol (20 ml) was refluxed for about 12 h to yield a yellow precipitate. The product was collected by vacuum filtration and washed with ethanol. The crude solid was redissolved in CH2Cl2 (100 ml) and washed with water (2*10 ml) and brine (10 ml). After dried over Na2SO4, the solvent was removed under vacuum, and yellow solid was isolated in yield 92% (3.1 g). Colourless single crystals of the compound suitable for X-ray analysis were grown from CH2Cl2 and absolute ethanol (4:1) by slow evaporation of the solvent at room temperature over a period of about two weeks.
All H atoms were placed in calculated positions and treated as riding on their parent atoms with C—H = 0.93 Å and Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C).
The maximum residual peak is located on the C1—Br1 bond, 1.04 Å from Br1.
Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2004); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2004); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2004); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: ORTEPIII (Burnett & Johnson, 1996) and ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997).
C14H10Br2N2 | F(000) = 356 |
Mr = 366.06 | Dx = 1.855 Mg m−3 |
Monoclinic, P21/c | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
Hall symbol: -P 2ybc | Cell parameters from 1131 reflections |
a = 6.8715 (8) Å | θ = 3.0–25.1° |
b = 4.0423 (5) Å | µ = 6.17 mm−1 |
c = 23.602 (3) Å | T = 298 K |
β = 91.058 (2)° | Block, colourless |
V = 655.48 (14) Å3 | 0.26 × 0.22 × 0.16 mm |
Z = 2 |
Bruker APEXII area-detector diffractometer | 1131 independent reflections |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | 979 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.136 |
ϕ and ω scans | θmax = 25.1°, θmin = 3.0° |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2004) | h = −8→7 |
Tmin = 0.218, Tmax = 0.377 | k = −4→4 |
3700 measured reflections | l = −28→28 |
Refinement on F2 | Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods |
Least-squares matrix: full | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.051 | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
wR(F2) = 0.130 | H-atom parameters constrained |
S = 1.04 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0848P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
1131 reflections | (Δ/σ)max = 0.001 |
82 parameters | Δρmax = 1.33 e Å−3 |
0 restraints | Δρmin = −0.82 e Å−3 |
C14H10Br2N2 | V = 655.48 (14) Å3 |
Mr = 366.06 | Z = 2 |
Monoclinic, P21/c | Mo Kα radiation |
a = 6.8715 (8) Å | µ = 6.17 mm−1 |
b = 4.0423 (5) Å | T = 298 K |
c = 23.602 (3) Å | 0.26 × 0.22 × 0.16 mm |
β = 91.058 (2)° |
Bruker APEXII area-detector diffractometer | 1131 independent reflections |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2004) | 979 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Tmin = 0.218, Tmax = 0.377 | Rint = 0.136 |
3700 measured reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.051 | 0 restraints |
wR(F2) = 0.130 | H-atom parameters constrained |
S = 1.04 | Δρmax = 1.33 e Å−3 |
1131 reflections | Δρmin = −0.82 e Å−3 |
82 parameters |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
C1 | 0.8273 (7) | 0.4656 (10) | 0.65065 (17) | 0.0358 (9) | |
C2 | 0.9996 (8) | 0.3733 (11) | 0.67720 (19) | 0.0428 (11) | |
H2 | 1.0185 | 0.4150 | 0.7157 | 0.051* | |
C3 | 1.1421 (7) | 0.2214 (12) | 0.6474 (2) | 0.0480 (12) | |
H3 | 1.2571 | 0.1573 | 0.6657 | 0.058* | |
C4 | 1.1158 (8) | 0.1618 (12) | 0.5895 (2) | 0.0477 (12) | |
H4 | 1.2120 | 0.0562 | 0.5690 | 0.057* | |
C5 | 0.9434 (7) | 0.2629 (13) | 0.56299 (19) | 0.0410 (10) | |
H5 | 0.9275 | 0.2287 | 0.5242 | 0.049* | |
C6 | 0.7955 (7) | 0.4119 (11) | 0.59219 (17) | 0.0345 (9) | |
C7 | 0.6189 (6) | 0.5142 (11) | 0.56233 (17) | 0.0407 (10) | |
H7 | 0.5262 | 0.6384 | 0.5811 | 0.049* | |
Br1 | 0.63312 (7) | 0.66624 (12) | 0.695542 (17) | 0.0464 (3) | |
N1 | 0.5899 (6) | 0.4354 (12) | 0.51072 (16) | 0.0471 (10) |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
C1 | 0.041 (2) | 0.031 (2) | 0.0346 (19) | −0.0041 (19) | −0.0059 (18) | 0.0023 (17) |
C2 | 0.046 (3) | 0.044 (2) | 0.038 (2) | −0.004 (2) | −0.010 (2) | 0.0021 (18) |
C3 | 0.036 (3) | 0.052 (3) | 0.055 (3) | 0.005 (2) | −0.013 (2) | 0.003 (2) |
C4 | 0.038 (3) | 0.054 (3) | 0.052 (3) | 0.007 (2) | 0.002 (2) | 0.000 (2) |
C5 | 0.032 (2) | 0.052 (2) | 0.039 (2) | 0.003 (2) | −0.0008 (19) | −0.001 (2) |
C6 | 0.032 (2) | 0.037 (2) | 0.034 (2) | −0.0035 (18) | −0.0010 (18) | 0.0004 (16) |
C7 | 0.032 (2) | 0.050 (3) | 0.040 (2) | 0.009 (2) | −0.0043 (18) | 0.000 (2) |
Br1 | 0.0442 (4) | 0.0549 (4) | 0.0400 (4) | 0.00242 (19) | 0.0035 (2) | −0.00488 (18) |
N1 | 0.038 (2) | 0.067 (2) | 0.0362 (19) | 0.013 (2) | −0.0067 (16) | −0.0035 (19) |
C1—C2 | 1.381 (7) | C4—H4 | 0.9300 |
C1—C6 | 1.410 (5) | C5—C6 | 1.378 (7) |
C1—Br1 | 1.901 (5) | C5—H5 | 0.9300 |
C2—C3 | 1.362 (8) | C6—C7 | 1.452 (6) |
C2—H2 | 0.9300 | C7—N1 | 1.271 (5) |
C3—C4 | 1.396 (7) | C7—H7 | 0.9300 |
C3—H3 | 0.9300 | N1—N1i | 1.425 (8) |
C4—C5 | 1.391 (7) | ||
C2—C1—C6 | 121.3 (4) | C3—C4—H4 | 120.6 |
C2—C1—Br1 | 117.9 (3) | C6—C5—C4 | 122.3 (4) |
C6—C1—Br1 | 120.9 (3) | C6—C5—H5 | 118.9 |
C3—C2—C1 | 120.4 (4) | C4—C5—H5 | 118.9 |
C3—C2—H2 | 119.8 | C5—C6—C1 | 117.0 (4) |
C1—C2—H2 | 119.8 | C5—C6—C7 | 120.0 (4) |
C2—C3—C4 | 120.1 (5) | C1—C6—C7 | 123.0 (4) |
C2—C3—H3 | 119.9 | N1—C7—C6 | 120.6 (4) |
C4—C3—H3 | 119.9 | N1—C7—H7 | 119.7 |
C5—C4—C3 | 118.9 (5) | C6—C7—H7 | 119.7 |
C5—C4—H4 | 120.6 | C7—N1—N1i | 111.6 (5) |
Symmetry code: (i) −x+1, −y+1, −z+1. |
Experimental details
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | C14H10Br2N2 |
Mr | 366.06 |
Crystal system, space group | Monoclinic, P21/c |
Temperature (K) | 298 |
a, b, c (Å) | 6.8715 (8), 4.0423 (5), 23.602 (3) |
β (°) | 91.058 (2) |
V (Å3) | 655.48 (14) |
Z | 2 |
Radiation type | Mo Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 6.17 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.26 × 0.22 × 0.16 |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Bruker APEXII area-detector diffractometer |
Absorption correction | Multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2004) |
Tmin, Tmax | 0.218, 0.377 |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections | 3700, 1131, 979 |
Rint | 0.136 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.597 |
Refinement | |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.051, 0.130, 1.04 |
No. of reflections | 1131 |
No. of parameters | 82 |
H-atom treatment | H-atom parameters constrained |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 1.33, −0.82 |
Computer programs: APEX2 (Bruker, 2004), SAINT (Bruker, 2004), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), ORTEPIII (Burnett & Johnson, 1996) and ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997).
Schiff base ligands have significant importance in chemistry, especially in the development of Schiff base complexes, (Johnson et al., 1996; Alizadeh et al., 1999; Wang & Zheng, 2007). Schiff bases that have solvent-dependent UV/vis spectra (solvatochromicity) can be suitable NLO (nonlinear optically active) materials (Alemi & Shaabani, 2000). They are also useful in the asymmetric oxidation of methyl phenyl sulfide and give good enantioselectivity (Kim & Shin, 1999). The structure of the title compound (I), has been reported previously (Marignan et al., 1972), but the results of this new study are of higher precision.
The molecular structure of the title compound has crystallographically imposed inversion symmetry located in the middle of the N—N bond (Fig. 1). The molecule is planar with the largest deviation from the mean plane being 0.055 (4) Å at Br1.
There is one intramolecular hydrogen bond (C7—H7···Br1) (Table 1). The C7—N1 are 1.272 (5) Å, indicative of a C═N double bond. The other C—N, C—Br, and C—C distances show no remarkable features (Allen, 2002). It is interesting to note that neighboring molecules are separated by relatively short Br···Br contact with 3.7702 (7) Å. These Br···Br interactions may help to stabilize the packinge.