Download citation
Download citation
link to html
Crystal structures are reported for three isomeric compounds, namely 2-(2-hydroxy­phenyl)-2-oxazoline, (I), 2-(3-hydroxy­phenyl)-2-oxazoline, (II), and 2-(4-hydroxy­phenyl)-2-oxazoline, (III), all C9H9NO2 [systematic names: 2-(4,5-dihydro-1,3-oxazol-2-yl)phenol, (I), 3-(4,5-dihydro-1,3-oxazol-2-yl)phenol, (II), and 4-(4,5-dihydro-1,3-oxazol-2-yl)phenol, (III)]. In these compounds, the deviation from coplanarity of the oxazoline and benzene rings is dependent on the position of the hydroxy group on the benzene ring. The coplanar arrangement in (I) is stabilized by a strong intra­molecular O—H...N hydrogen bond. Surprisingly, the 2-oxazoline ring in mol­ecule B of (II) adopts a 3T4 (C2TC3) conformation, while the 2-oxazoline ring in mol­ecule A, as well as that in (I) and (III), is nearly planar, as expected. Tetra­mers of mol­ecules of (II) are formed and they are bound together via weak C—H...N hydrogen bonds. In (III), strong inter­molecular O—H...N hydrogen bonds and weak intra­molecular C—H...O hydrogen bonds lead to the formation of an infinite chain of mol­ecules perpendicular to the b direction. This paper also reports a theoretical investigation of hydrogen bonds, based on density functional theory (DFT) employing periodic boundary conditions.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270105027812/dn1097sup1.cif
Contains datablocks I, II, III, global

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270105027812/dn1097Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270105027812/dn1097IIsup3.hkl
Contains datablock II

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270105027812/dn1097IIIsup4.hkl
Contains datablock III

CCDC references: 288628; 288629; 288630

Comment top

Cyclic imino ethers, among them 2-oxazolines, are important intermediates in organic synthesis. The title compounds, (I)–(III), were prepared in the course of our research focused on cyclic imino ethers and their utilization in polymer chemistry (Kronek et al., 1998), as hydroxyphenyl-2-oxazolines are known to produce poly(ether-amides) on heating of the monomer (Wörner et al., 1995). Although the syntheses of these compounds have already been reported [for (I), Cwik et al., 2002; Black & Wade, 1972; Peterson et al., 1980; for (II), Kalle, 1969; for (III), Nonnenmacher & Plieninger, 1982], their crystal structures have not been published until now. Among 87 matches from the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD, February 2005 update, version 5.26; Allen, 2002) for (I), only 15 structures were relevant (i.e. having a 4,5-unsubstituted 2-oxazoline ring and a 3',4',5',6'-unsubstituted 2'-hydroxyphenyl moiety), but in all these compounds the [Text missing?]. 2-(2'-Hydroxyphenyl)-2-oxazoline has been reported as a ligand in several complexes with metals such as Fe, Mn, Ni, V, Zn, Al, In and Re (e.g. Qian et al., 2004; Kooijman et al., 2002; Miller et al., 1999; Melchior et al., 1999). For compounds (II) and (III), a CSD search revealed only one and 13 similar structures, respectively, but none of them had a relevant hydroxyl group in the meta or para position of the benzene ring.

Selected geometric parameters for (I), (II) and (III) are listed in Table 1. The numbering schemes, together with the corresponding atomic displacement ellipsoid plots, are shown in Figs. 1–3, respectively. The crystal packings of (I) and (II) are depicted in Figs. 4 and 5, respectively. The hydrogen-bonding schemes for (II) and (III) are shown in Figs. 6 and 7, respectively. The hydrogen-bonding geometries for (I), (II) and (III) are listed in Table 2. The theoretical investigation of hydrogen bonds was performed using the Vienna ab initio simulation package VASP (Kresse & Furthmüller, 1996; Kresse & Hafner, 1993). The calculations were based on density functional theory (DFT) with periodic boundary conditions (Jones & Gunnarsson, 1989).

The 2-oxazoline ring in (I) and (III) is nearly planar. Surprisingly, in the case of compound (II), with two molecules, A and B, in the asymmetric unit, the values of the relevant dihedral angles (Table 1) and puckering parameters (Cremer & Pople, 1975), Q = 0.108 (3) Å and ϕ = 310.3 (17)°, indicate that this ring in molecule B deviates significantly from planarity (twisting about the C3B—C2B bond) and adopts a 3T4 (C2TC3) conformation, while the 2-oxazoline ring in molecule A is again nearly planar. This difference may be due to the arrangement of molecule B in the tetramer, as well as hydrogen bonding.

As seen from the values of the acute angles between the planes of the oxazolinyl and phenyl rings [0.74 (4)° for (I), 4.75 (16) and 3.49 (17)° for molecules A and B of (II), respectively, and 11.22 (6)° for (III)], the mutual position of these rings reflects the location (ortho, meta or para, respectively) of the hydroxyl group on the phenyl ring. In this respect, the coplanarity of both rings in the o-hydroxy derivative, (I) (Fig. 1), and the most evident deviation from coplanarity in the p-hydroxy derivative, (III), is observed. We assume that the coplanar arrangement of the rings and the syn-periplanar orientation of atom O2 (ortho-hydroxyl group) with respect to the C10—N1 bond in (I) is stabilized by the strong intramolecular O2—H2···N1 hydrogen bond (Table 2). In this regard, free rotation about the sp2sp2 C1—C4 bond could be sufficiently restricted, leading to possible atropisomerism, and this is probably responsible for the chirality because, although there is no chiral atom in (I), optical activity of [α]20D = 3.0 (c = 1, CHCl3) was observed for this compound. The syn-periplanar arrangement of atom N1 relative to the C4—C5 bond, with atom N1 directed slightly below the phenyl ring plane, is observed for both molecules A and B of the m-hydroxy derivative, (II) (Fig. 2). In the case of molecule A, similar to the C5—O2 and C1—N1 bonds in (I), the C6—O2 and C1—N1 bonds are oriented cis with respect to the plane perpendicular to the plane of the phenyl and oxazoline rings across the C1—C4 bond. In contrast, the orientation of the C6—O2 and C1—N1 bonds is trans in the case of molecule B. For the p-hydroxy derivative, (III), shown in Fig. 3, the C1—N1 and C4—C5 bonds are oriented antiperiplanar, with atom N1 directed slightly above the plane of the phenyl ring.

The C1—C4 bond in compounds (I)–(III) is significantly shorter than the usual single C—C bond (Table 1; Reference for standard value?), indicating a weak conjugation between the 2-oxazoline ring substituted at the C-2 position (C1) and the phenyl group.

The hydrogen-bonding patterns can be described using graph theory (Bernstein et al., 1995; Grell et al., 1999). For (I), there is just one intramolecular hydrogen bond of the O—H···N type, which is, on the first-level graph-set, described as an S(6) string. For (II), there are two strong hydrogen bonds of the O—H···N type, two weak intramolecular bonds of the C—H···O type and one weak intermolecular interaction of the C—H···N type. On the first-level graph-set, the hydrogen-bonding pattern can be classified as D(2) for hydrogen bonds (IIa) and (IIb), S(5) for (IIc) and (IIe), and as a C(7) chain for hydrogen bond (IId) (Table 2). On the second-level graph-set, the above-mentioned tetramer is described as an R44(28) ring formed by hydrogen bonds (IIa) and (IIb), apart from D33(14) and D23(10) for bonds (IIa) and (IId), and (IIb) and (IId), respectively. The first-level graph-set descriptors for (III) are C(8) for the strong hydrogen bond (IIIa) and S(5) for the weak intramolecular hydrogen bond (IIIb). The molecules thus form an infinite chain perpendicular to the b direction, diagonal in the ab plane. The assignment of graph-set descriptors was performed using PLUTO, as described by Motherwell et al. (1999), and the notation of the hydrogen bonds here is that given in Table 2.

Experimental top

Compound (I) was prepared according to the procedure of Kobayashi et al. (1984). In the first step, 2-hydroxybenzoic acid methyl ester was reacted with an excess of ethanolamine at 413 K to give the corresponding hydroxyamide. This, in the next step upon treatment with thionyl chloride, afforded the required compound, (I). Compounds (II) and (III) were prepared analogously starting from the 3-hydroxy- or 4-hydroxybenzoic acid methyl ester, respectively. The analytical data of all three title compounds were in accordance with those published previously. Colourless single crystals of adequate quality for diffraction analysis [with the exception of (II)] were obtained by slow crystallization from nearly saturated solutions in ethanol under moderate cooling in a refrigerator.

Refinement top

The sample of (II) used for data collection was not a single-crystal. Nevertheless, it was possible to resolve one set of diffractions from one domain. As a result, there were overlapping reflections: 118 reflections were omitted from the data set due to severe Fo/Fc discrepancies (Fo >> Fc). H atoms for all compounds were refined isotropically and constrained to the ideal geometry using an appropriate riding model. For aromatic H atoms, the C—H distance was kept fixed at 0.95 Å, and for secondary H atoms, C—H = 0.99 Å. For the hydroxyl groups, the O—H distances (0.84 Å) and C—O—H angles (109.5°) were kept fixed, while the torsion angles were allowed to refine, with the starting position based on the circular Fourier synthesis.

Computing details top

For all compounds, data collection: SMART (Siemens, 1995); cell refinement: SAINT (Siemens, 1995); data reduction: SAINT and SADABS (Sheldrick, 2002); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Bruker, 2001); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL; molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2005); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL.

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The numbering scheme for (I), with atomic displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. The numbering scheme for (II), with atomic displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level.
[Figure 3] Fig. 3. The numbering scheme for (III), with atomic displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level.
[Figure 4] Fig. 4. The unit-cell contents of (I) in projection along the a axis. H atoms not involved in hydrogen bonding have been omitted for clarity.
[Figure 5] Fig. 5. A projection of the structure of (II) along the a axis. The tetramers are bound together via the weak hydrogen bonds shown as dashed lines. H atoms not involved in hydrogen bonding have been omitted for clarity.
[Figure 6] Fig. 6. A tetramer of molecules of (II) formed via hydrogen bonds shown as dashed lines. H atoms not involved in hydrogen bonding have been omitted for clarity.
[Figure 7] Fig. 7. The hydrogen-bonding pattern in the crystal lattice of (III). H atoms not involved in hydrogen bonding have been omitted for clarity.
(I) 2-(4,5-dihydro-1,3-oxazol-2-yl)phenol top
Crystal data top
C9H9NO2F(000) = 344
Mr = 163.17Dx = 1.394 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ynCell parameters from 8192 reflections
a = 5.7562 (1) Åθ = 2.5–33.0°
b = 11.2464 (1) ŵ = 0.10 mm1
c = 12.1365 (1) ÅT = 173 K
β = 98.162 (1)°Block, colourless
V = 777.72 (2) Å30.80 × 0.42 × 0.40 mm
Z = 4
Data collection top
Siemens SMART CCD area-detector
diffractometer
2785 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube2451 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.026
ω scansθmax = 33.0°, θmin = 2.5°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 2002)
h = 88
Tmin = 0.724, Tmax = 0.961k = 1617
13125 measured reflectionsl = 1817
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.040H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.119 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0707P)2 + 0.1146P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.03(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
2785 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.36 e Å3
120 parametersΔρmin = 0.20 e Å3
0 restraintsExtinction correction: SHELXTL (Bruker, 2001), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction coefficient: 0.051 (7)
Crystal data top
C9H9NO2V = 777.72 (2) Å3
Mr = 163.17Z = 4
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation
a = 5.7562 (1) ŵ = 0.10 mm1
b = 11.2464 (1) ÅT = 173 K
c = 12.1365 (1) Å0.80 × 0.42 × 0.40 mm
β = 98.162 (1)°
Data collection top
Siemens SMART CCD area-detector
diffractometer
2785 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 2002)
2451 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.724, Tmax = 0.961Rint = 0.026
13125 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0400 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.119H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.03Δρmax = 0.36 e Å3
2785 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.20 e Å3
120 parameters
Special details top

Experimental. Data were collected at low temperature using a Siemens SMART CCD diffractometer equiped with an LT-2 device. A full sphere of reciprocal space was scanned by 0.3° steps in ω with a crystal-to-detector distance of 3.97 cm, 10 s per frame. The preliminary orientation matrix was obtained from the first 100 frames using SMART (Siemens, 1995). The collected frames were integrated using the preliminary orientation matrix, which was updated every 100 frames. Final cell parameters were obtained by refinement on the position of 8192 reflections with I > 10σ(I) after integration of all the frames data using SAINT (Siemens, 1995).

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O10.31502 (11)0.53523 (5)0.92298 (5)0.03030 (15)
O20.22761 (12)0.67838 (6)0.76625 (5)0.03624 (17)
H20.13850.62070.74690.067 (5)*
N10.10084 (12)0.51985 (6)0.78128 (5)0.02756 (15)
C10.14136 (12)0.57529 (6)0.86899 (6)0.02236 (15)
C20.26962 (16)0.42099 (7)0.76396 (7)0.03023 (18)
H2A0.18730.34350.76850.030 (3)*
H2B0.36840.42750.69050.041 (3)*
C30.41902 (15)0.43393 (7)0.85872 (7)0.02926 (17)
H3A0.58530.44970.82890.034 (3)*
H3B0.41020.36120.90500.033 (3)*
C40.01057 (12)0.67954 (6)0.91529 (6)0.02151 (15)
C50.17266 (13)0.72529 (7)0.86198 (6)0.02536 (16)
C60.30083 (15)0.82308 (8)0.90818 (7)0.03128 (18)
H60.42650.85350.87360.054 (4)*
C70.24526 (15)0.87594 (8)1.00426 (7)0.03189 (18)
H70.33330.94251.03500.046 (3)*
C80.06187 (15)0.83266 (7)1.05639 (7)0.02959 (17)
H80.02390.86981.12180.045 (3)*
C90.06450 (13)0.73495 (7)1.01192 (6)0.02515 (16)
H90.18940.70511.04740.043 (3)*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0328 (3)0.0291 (3)0.0312 (3)0.0091 (2)0.0123 (2)0.0052 (2)
O20.0395 (3)0.0433 (4)0.0294 (3)0.0078 (3)0.0170 (3)0.0050 (2)
N10.0320 (3)0.0279 (3)0.0231 (3)0.0025 (2)0.0051 (2)0.0019 (2)
C10.0234 (3)0.0224 (3)0.0213 (3)0.0008 (2)0.0031 (2)0.0028 (2)
C20.0388 (4)0.0259 (4)0.0255 (3)0.0045 (3)0.0030 (3)0.0012 (3)
C30.0292 (4)0.0256 (3)0.0328 (4)0.0046 (3)0.0037 (3)0.0020 (3)
C40.0217 (3)0.0219 (3)0.0212 (3)0.0003 (2)0.0039 (2)0.0021 (2)
C50.0256 (3)0.0285 (4)0.0231 (3)0.0005 (3)0.0071 (2)0.0027 (2)
C60.0287 (4)0.0334 (4)0.0331 (4)0.0073 (3)0.0091 (3)0.0021 (3)
C70.0331 (4)0.0289 (4)0.0338 (4)0.0083 (3)0.0054 (3)0.0018 (3)
C80.0336 (4)0.0270 (4)0.0292 (4)0.0034 (3)0.0079 (3)0.0040 (3)
C90.0262 (3)0.0251 (3)0.0254 (3)0.0019 (2)0.0078 (2)0.0010 (2)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
O1—C11.3481 (9)C3—H3B0.9900
O1—C31.4601 (10)C4—C91.4012 (10)
O2—C51.3537 (9)C4—C51.4104 (10)
O2—H20.8400C5—C61.3968 (11)
N1—C11.2832 (10)C6—C71.3861 (12)
N1—C21.4718 (11)C6—H60.9500
C1—C41.4619 (10)C7—C81.3932 (11)
C2—C31.5376 (12)C7—H70.9500
C2—H2A0.9900C8—C91.3843 (11)
C2—H2B0.9900C8—H80.9500
C3—H3A0.9900C9—H90.9500
C1—O1—C3106.10 (6)C9—C4—C5119.38 (7)
C5—O2—H2109.5C9—C4—C1121.01 (6)
C1—N1—C2106.95 (7)C5—C4—C1119.61 (6)
N1—C1—O1118.38 (7)O2—C5—C6118.48 (7)
N1—C1—C4124.35 (7)O2—C5—C4122.18 (7)
O1—C1—C4117.27 (6)C6—C5—C4119.33 (7)
N1—C2—C3104.45 (6)C7—C6—C5120.23 (7)
N1—C2—H2A110.9C7—C6—H6119.9
C3—C2—H2A110.9C5—C6—H6119.9
N1—C2—H2B110.9C6—C7—C8120.82 (7)
C3—C2—H2B110.9C6—C7—H7119.6
H2A—C2—H2B108.9C8—C7—H7119.6
O1—C3—C2104.06 (6)C9—C8—C7119.37 (7)
O1—C3—H3A110.9C9—C8—H8120.3
C2—C3—H3A110.9C7—C8—H8120.3
O1—C3—H3B110.9C8—C9—C4120.84 (7)
C2—C3—H3B110.9C8—C9—H9119.6
H3A—C3—H3B109.0C4—C9—H9119.6
C2—N1—C1—O10.07 (10)C9—C4—C5—O2177.58 (7)
C2—N1—C1—C4179.78 (7)C1—C4—C5—O22.37 (11)
C3—O1—C1—N11.64 (10)C9—C4—C5—C61.65 (11)
C3—O1—C1—C4178.64 (6)C1—C4—C5—C6178.40 (7)
C1—N1—C2—C31.43 (8)O2—C5—C6—C7178.02 (8)
C1—O1—C3—C22.32 (8)C4—C5—C6—C71.24 (12)
N1—C2—C3—O12.27 (8)C5—C6—C7—C80.11 (13)
N1—C1—C4—C9179.65 (7)C6—C7—C8—C90.60 (13)
O1—C1—C4—C90.06 (10)C7—C8—C9—C40.17 (12)
N1—C1—C4—C50.40 (11)C5—C4—C9—C80.96 (11)
O1—C1—C4—C5179.89 (6)C1—C4—C9—C8179.10 (7)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O2—H2···N10.841.882.6238 (9)148
(II) 3-(4,5-dihydro-1,3-oxazol-2-yl)phenol top
Crystal data top
C9H9NO2F(000) = 688
Mr = 163.17Dx = 1.360 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 8192 reflections
a = 11.3650 (2) Åθ = 2.4–25.0°
b = 12.5867 (1) ŵ = 0.10 mm1
c = 11.2966 (2) ÅT = 173 K
β = 99.534 (1)°Needle, colourless
V = 1593.63 (4) Å30.58 × 0.18 × 0.16 mm
Z = 8
Data collection top
Siemens SMART CCD area-detector
diffractometer
2663 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube2167 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.056
ω scansθmax = 25.0°, θmin = 2.4°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 2002)
h = 1313
Tmin = 0.816, Tmax = 0.985k = 1414
14444 measured reflectionsl = 1313
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.068Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.175H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.00 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.079P)2 + 2.9545P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2663 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
237 parametersΔρmax = 0.39 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.22 e Å3
Crystal data top
C9H9NO2V = 1593.63 (4) Å3
Mr = 163.17Z = 8
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation
a = 11.3650 (2) ŵ = 0.10 mm1
b = 12.5867 (1) ÅT = 173 K
c = 11.2966 (2) Å0.58 × 0.18 × 0.16 mm
β = 99.534 (1)°
Data collection top
Siemens SMART CCD area-detector
diffractometer
2663 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 2002)
2167 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.816, Tmax = 0.985Rint = 0.056
14444 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0680 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.175H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.00Δρmax = 0.39 e Å3
2663 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.22 e Å3
237 parameters
Special details top

Experimental. The sample used was not a single-crystal. Nevertheless, it was possible to resolve one set of diffractions from one domain. As a result, there were overlapping reflections; 118 reflections were omitted from the data set due to severe Fo/Fc discrepancies (Fo >> Fc). Data were collected at low temperature using a Siemens SMART CCD diffractometer equiped with an LT-2 device. A full sphere of reciprocal space was scanned by 0.3° steps in ω with a crystal-to-detector distance of 3.97 cm, 30 s per frame. The preliminary orientation matrix was obtained from the first 100 frames using SMART (Siemens, 1995). The collected frames were integrated using the preliminary orientation matrix, which was updated every 100 frames. Final cell parameters were obtained by refinement on the position of 8192 reflections with I > 10σ(I) after integration of all the frames data using SAINT (Siemens, 1995).

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O1A0.40833 (18)0.30148 (17)0.02099 (19)0.0298 (5)
O2A0.6332 (2)0.5838 (2)0.3143 (2)0.0374 (6)
H2A0.70060.56120.28210.10 (2)*
N1A0.6025 (2)0.2864 (2)0.0037 (2)0.0258 (6)
C1A0.5023 (2)0.3329 (2)0.0302 (2)0.0217 (6)
C2A0.5856 (3)0.2091 (3)0.0989 (3)0.0286 (7)
H2A10.63270.23000.17720.041 (10)*
H2A20.60960.13680.07820.028 (8)*
C3A0.4508 (3)0.2139 (3)0.1028 (3)0.0351 (8)
H3A10.41120.14630.07470.043 (10)*
H3A20.43600.22890.18510.046 (11)*
C4A0.4774 (2)0.4158 (2)0.1222 (3)0.0221 (6)
C5A0.5708 (2)0.4592 (2)0.1727 (3)0.0227 (6)
H5A0.65030.43570.14700.031 (9)*
C6A0.5470 (3)0.5371 (2)0.2610 (3)0.0249 (7)
C7A0.4300 (3)0.5723 (3)0.2977 (3)0.0297 (7)
H7A0.41360.62550.35780.041 (10)*
C8A0.3378 (3)0.5294 (3)0.2463 (3)0.0295 (7)
H8A0.25860.55410.27140.037 (9)*
C9A0.3594 (3)0.4516 (2)0.1593 (3)0.0265 (7)
H9A0.29570.42250.12490.053 (11)*
O1B0.94268 (18)0.51245 (18)0.2167 (2)0.0308 (5)
O2B0.79400 (19)0.24456 (19)0.1031 (2)0.0350 (6)
H2B0.74080.26580.06520.040 (11)*
N1B1.1424 (2)0.4989 (2)0.2554 (2)0.0286 (6)
C1B1.0449 (2)0.4678 (2)0.1923 (3)0.0222 (6)
C2B1.1129 (3)0.5829 (3)0.3369 (3)0.0351 (8)
H2B11.14180.65290.31420.024 (8)*
H2B21.14880.56720.42110.037 (9)*
C3B0.9764 (3)0.5809 (3)0.3210 (3)0.0330 (8)
H3B10.94890.55090.39280.031 (9)*
H3B20.94270.65310.30580.050 (11)*
C4B1.0302 (2)0.3875 (2)0.0969 (3)0.0224 (6)
C5B0.9157 (3)0.3550 (2)0.0437 (3)0.0239 (6)
H5B0.84730.38480.06940.028 (8)*
C6B0.9024 (3)0.2791 (2)0.0469 (3)0.0252 (7)
C7B1.0028 (3)0.2351 (3)0.0846 (3)0.0304 (7)
H7B0.99350.18300.14630.031 (9)*
C8B1.1161 (3)0.2675 (3)0.0319 (3)0.0293 (7)
H8B1.18420.23770.05810.020 (8)*
C9B1.1310 (3)0.3435 (2)0.0590 (3)0.0278 (7)
H9B1.20880.36520.09510.040 (10)*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O1A0.0215 (11)0.0321 (12)0.0376 (12)0.0037 (9)0.0100 (9)0.0086 (10)
O2A0.0249 (12)0.0423 (14)0.0463 (14)0.0004 (10)0.0096 (11)0.0148 (12)
N1A0.0220 (13)0.0253 (13)0.0305 (14)0.0023 (10)0.0061 (10)0.0045 (11)
C1A0.0208 (14)0.0209 (15)0.0240 (15)0.0021 (11)0.0058 (12)0.0040 (12)
C2A0.0286 (17)0.0264 (16)0.0320 (17)0.0072 (13)0.0088 (13)0.0053 (13)
C3A0.0320 (18)0.0320 (18)0.043 (2)0.0042 (14)0.0106 (15)0.0159 (15)
C4A0.0220 (15)0.0210 (15)0.0232 (14)0.0010 (11)0.0036 (11)0.0046 (12)
C5A0.0192 (14)0.0242 (15)0.0241 (15)0.0023 (11)0.0018 (12)0.0033 (12)
C6A0.0224 (15)0.0277 (16)0.0253 (15)0.0016 (12)0.0059 (12)0.0030 (13)
C7A0.0304 (17)0.0302 (17)0.0277 (16)0.0037 (13)0.0027 (13)0.0055 (14)
C8A0.0228 (15)0.0318 (17)0.0332 (17)0.0068 (13)0.0028 (13)0.0015 (14)
C9A0.0215 (15)0.0279 (16)0.0302 (16)0.0031 (12)0.0050 (12)0.0023 (13)
O1B0.0184 (10)0.0365 (13)0.0379 (12)0.0007 (9)0.0055 (9)0.0137 (10)
O2B0.0222 (11)0.0422 (14)0.0415 (13)0.0051 (10)0.0077 (10)0.0133 (11)
N1B0.0223 (13)0.0308 (14)0.0334 (14)0.0027 (11)0.0070 (11)0.0039 (12)
C1B0.0172 (14)0.0235 (15)0.0277 (15)0.0000 (11)0.0089 (12)0.0043 (12)
C2B0.0303 (17)0.0389 (19)0.0360 (18)0.0038 (14)0.0047 (14)0.0109 (15)
C3B0.0307 (17)0.0359 (18)0.0340 (17)0.0006 (14)0.0101 (14)0.0132 (15)
C4B0.0209 (14)0.0208 (15)0.0258 (15)0.0007 (12)0.0052 (11)0.0036 (12)
C5B0.0189 (14)0.0257 (15)0.0280 (15)0.0019 (12)0.0063 (12)0.0007 (13)
C6B0.0236 (15)0.0239 (15)0.0288 (16)0.0033 (12)0.0063 (12)0.0010 (13)
C7B0.0360 (18)0.0265 (16)0.0306 (16)0.0007 (13)0.0108 (14)0.0055 (14)
C8B0.0217 (15)0.0324 (17)0.0360 (17)0.0047 (13)0.0113 (13)0.0022 (14)
C9B0.0211 (15)0.0293 (17)0.0340 (17)0.0016 (12)0.0077 (13)0.0028 (13)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
O1A—C1A1.356 (3)O1B—C1B1.359 (3)
O1A—C3A1.468 (4)O1B—C3B1.459 (4)
O2A—C6A1.364 (4)O2B—C6B1.360 (4)
O2A—H2A0.8400O2B—H2B0.8400
N1A—C1A1.281 (4)N1B—C1B1.276 (4)
N1A—C2A1.486 (4)N1B—C2B1.476 (4)
C1A—C4A1.466 (4)C1B—C4B1.467 (4)
C2A—C3A1.540 (4)C2B—C3B1.533 (4)
C2A—H2A10.9900C2B—H2B10.9900
C2A—H2A20.9900C2B—H2B20.9900
C3A—H3A10.9900C3B—H3B10.9900
C3A—H3A20.9900C3B—H3B20.9900
C4A—C9A1.411 (4)C4B—C9B1.402 (4)
C4A—C5A1.398 (4)C4B—C5B1.402 (4)
C5A—C6A1.393 (4)C5B—C6B1.390 (4)
C5A—H5A0.9500C5B—H5B0.9500
C6A—C7A1.398 (4)C6B—C7B1.397 (4)
C7A—C8A1.389 (4)C7B—C8B1.388 (4)
C7A—H7A0.9500C7B—H7B0.9500
C8A—C9A1.380 (4)C8B—C9B1.393 (4)
C8A—H8A0.9500C8B—H8B0.9500
C9A—H9A0.9500C9B—H9B0.9500
C1A—O1A—C3A106.7 (2)C1B—O1B—C3B106.8 (2)
C6A—O2A—H2A109.5C6B—O2B—H2B109.5
C1A—N1A—C2A107.5 (2)C1B—N1B—C2B107.6 (2)
N1A—C1A—O1A117.6 (3)N1B—C1B—O1B116.9 (3)
N1A—C1A—C4A126.5 (3)N1B—C1B—C4B127.2 (3)
O1A—C1A—C4A115.9 (2)O1B—C1B—C4B115.9 (2)
N1A—C2A—C3A104.1 (2)N1B—C2B—C3B104.2 (2)
N1A—C2A—H2A1110.9N1B—C2B—H2B1110.9
C3A—C2A—H2A1110.9C3B—C2B—H2B1110.9
N1A—C2A—H2A2110.9N1B—C2B—H2B2110.9
C3A—C2A—H2A2110.9C3B—C2B—H2B2110.9
H2A1—C2A—H2A2109.0H2B1—C2B—H2B2108.9
O1A—C3A—C2A103.7 (2)O1B—C3B—C2B103.3 (2)
O1A—C3A—H3A1111.0O1B—C3B—H3B1111.1
C2A—C3A—H3A1111.0C2B—C3B—H3B1111.1
O1A—C3A—H3A2111.0O1B—C3B—H3B2111.1
C2A—C3A—H3A2111.0C2B—C3B—H3B2111.1
H3A1—C3A—H3A2109.0H3B1—C3B—H3B2109.1
C9A—C4A—C5A120.2 (3)C9B—C4B—C5B120.1 (3)
C9A—C4A—C1A120.1 (3)C9B—C4B—C1B119.8 (3)
C5A—C4A—C1A119.8 (3)C5B—C4B—C1B120.0 (3)
C6A—C5A—C4A119.9 (3)C6B—C5B—C4B119.7 (3)
C6A—C5A—H5A120.1C6B—C5B—H5B120.1
C4A—C5A—H5A120.1C4B—C5B—H5B120.1
O2A—C6A—C5A123.4 (3)O2B—C6B—C5B122.8 (3)
O2A—C6A—C7A116.8 (3)O2B—C6B—C7B117.0 (3)
C5A—C6A—C7A119.8 (3)C5B—C6B—C7B120.2 (3)
C8A—C7A—C6A120.0 (3)C8B—C7B—C6B120.0 (3)
C8A—C7A—H7A120.0C8B—C7B—H7B120.0
C6A—C7A—H7A120.0C6B—C7B—H7B120.0
C7A—C8A—C9A121.0 (3)C7B—C8B—C9B120.6 (3)
C7A—C8A—H8A119.5C7B—C8B—H8B119.7
C9A—C8A—H8A119.5C9B—C8B—H8B119.7
C4A—C9A—C8A119.1 (3)C8B—C9B—C4B119.4 (3)
C4A—C9A—H9A120.4C8B—C9B—H9B120.3
C8A—C9A—H9A120.4C4B—C9B—H9B120.3
C2A—N1A—C1A—O1A2.1 (4)C2B—N1B—C1B—O1B2.8 (4)
C2A—N1A—C1A—C4A179.6 (3)C2B—N1B—C1B—C4B178.3 (3)
C3A—O1A—C1A—N1A2.4 (4)C3B—O1B—C1B—N1B4.7 (4)
C3A—O1A—C1A—C4A176.0 (2)C3B—O1B—C1B—C4B174.3 (2)
C1A—N1A—C2A—C3A5.5 (3)C1B—N1B—C2B—C3B8.7 (3)
C1A—O1A—C3A—C2A5.6 (3)C1B—O1B—C3B—C2B9.5 (3)
N1A—C2A—C3A—O1A6.6 (3)N1B—C2B—C3B—O1B10.9 (3)
N1A—C1A—C4A—C9A173.1 (3)N1B—C1B—C4B—C9B6.2 (5)
O1A—C1A—C4A—C9A5.2 (4)O1B—C1B—C4B—C9B174.9 (3)
N1A—C1A—C4A—C5A6.9 (4)N1B—C1B—C4B—C5B173.9 (3)
O1A—C1A—C4A—C5A174.8 (2)O1B—C1B—C4B—C5B5.0 (4)
C9A—C4A—C5A—C6A0.7 (4)C9B—C4B—C5B—C6B0.1 (4)
C1A—C4A—C5A—C6A179.3 (3)C1B—C4B—C5B—C6B179.8 (3)
C4A—C5A—C6A—O2A179.6 (3)C4B—C5B—C6B—O2B179.5 (3)
C4A—C5A—C6A—C7A0.7 (4)C4B—C5B—C6B—C7B0.2 (4)
O2A—C6A—C7A—C8A179.2 (3)O2B—C6B—C7B—C8B179.4 (3)
C5A—C6A—C7A—C8A0.1 (5)C5B—C6B—C7B—C8B0.3 (5)
C6A—C7A—C8A—C9A0.4 (5)C6B—C7B—C8B—C9B0.3 (5)
C5A—C4A—C9A—C8A0.3 (4)C7B—C8B—C9B—C4B0.3 (5)
C1A—C4A—C9A—C8A179.7 (3)C5B—C4B—C9B—C8B0.2 (4)
C7A—C8A—C9A—C4A0.3 (5)C1B—C4B—C9B—C8B179.8 (3)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O2A—H2A···N1Bi0.841.922.732 (3)164
O2B—H2B···N1A0.841.882.709 (3)167
C5B—H5B···O1B0.952.432.764 (4)100
C7A—H7A···N1Aii0.952.603.540 (4)171
C9A—H9A···O1A0.952.452.767 (4)100
Symmetry codes: (i) x+2, y+1, z; (ii) x+1, y+1/2, z1/2.
(III) 4-(4,5-dihydro-1,3-oxazol-2-yl)phenol top
Crystal data top
C9H9NO2F(000) = 344
Mr = 163.17Dx = 1.394 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ynCell parameters from 6730 reflections
a = 4.7778 (1) Åθ = 2.3–33.1°
b = 14.9883 (2) ŵ = 0.10 mm1
c = 10.9194 (1) ÅT = 173 K
β = 95.945 (1)°Plate, colourless
V = 777.74 (2) Å30.60 × 0.32 × 0.06 mm
Z = 4
Data collection top
Siemens SMART CCD area-detector
diffractometer
2784 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube2064 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.038
ω scansθmax = 33.1°, θmin = 2.3°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 2002)
h = 77
Tmin = 0.710, Tmax = 0.994k = 2222
13219 measured reflectionsl = 1616
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.047Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.133H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.02 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0613P)2 + 0.2076P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2784 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
119 parametersΔρmax = 0.32 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.21 e Å3
Crystal data top
C9H9NO2V = 777.74 (2) Å3
Mr = 163.17Z = 4
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation
a = 4.7778 (1) ŵ = 0.10 mm1
b = 14.9883 (2) ÅT = 173 K
c = 10.9194 (1) Å0.60 × 0.32 × 0.06 mm
β = 95.945 (1)°
Data collection top
Siemens SMART CCD area-detector
diffractometer
2784 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 2002)
2064 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.710, Tmax = 0.994Rint = 0.038
13219 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0470 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.133H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.02Δρmax = 0.32 e Å3
2784 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.21 e Å3
119 parameters
Special details top

Experimental. Data were collected at low temperature using a Siemens SMART CCD diffractometer equiped with an LT-2 device. A full sphere of reciprocal space was scanned by 0.3° steps in ω with a crystal-to-detector distance of 3.97 cm, 10 s per frame. The preliminary orientation matrix was obtained from the first 100 frames using SMART (Siemens, 1995). The collected frames were integrated using the preliminary orientation matrix, which was updated every 100 frames. Final cell parameters were obtained by refinement on the position of 6730 reflections with I > 10σ(I) after integration of all the frames data using SAINT (Siemens, 1995).

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O10.8194 (2)0.53816 (6)0.60741 (8)0.0375 (2)
O20.04190 (19)0.88041 (6)0.51369 (8)0.0319 (2)
H20.09430.89870.44700.068 (6)*
N10.7108 (2)0.55667 (7)0.80165 (9)0.0294 (2)
C10.6770 (2)0.58270 (7)0.68969 (10)0.0259 (2)
C20.9168 (3)0.48288 (8)0.80957 (12)0.0343 (3)
H2A0.83710.42860.84430.046 (4)*
H2B1.09100.49980.86140.045 (4)*
C30.9756 (3)0.46749 (9)0.67567 (12)0.0348 (3)
H3A1.17940.47220.66720.040 (4)*
H3B0.90810.40800.64640.047 (4)*
C40.5040 (2)0.65798 (7)0.64100 (10)0.0254 (2)
C50.5233 (3)0.68982 (8)0.52173 (10)0.0307 (3)
H50.64360.66060.47050.050 (5)*
C60.3699 (3)0.76319 (8)0.47749 (10)0.0300 (2)
H60.38510.78380.39620.041 (4)*
C70.1922 (2)0.80737 (7)0.55155 (10)0.0253 (2)
C80.1695 (2)0.77513 (8)0.67048 (10)0.0306 (2)
H80.04730.80390.72130.042 (4)*
C90.3237 (2)0.70175 (8)0.71444 (10)0.0292 (2)
H90.30700.68070.79550.038 (4)*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0452 (5)0.0399 (5)0.0288 (4)0.0132 (4)0.0105 (4)0.0020 (4)
O20.0359 (5)0.0342 (5)0.0266 (4)0.0060 (3)0.0090 (3)0.0026 (3)
N10.0328 (5)0.0287 (5)0.0272 (5)0.0015 (4)0.0060 (4)0.0001 (4)
C10.0250 (5)0.0272 (5)0.0259 (5)0.0025 (4)0.0051 (4)0.0042 (4)
C20.0356 (6)0.0322 (6)0.0359 (6)0.0042 (5)0.0070 (5)0.0033 (5)
C30.0356 (6)0.0303 (6)0.0390 (7)0.0050 (5)0.0057 (5)0.0028 (5)
C40.0248 (5)0.0287 (5)0.0233 (5)0.0016 (4)0.0048 (4)0.0024 (4)
C50.0343 (6)0.0363 (6)0.0229 (5)0.0044 (5)0.0091 (4)0.0024 (4)
C60.0346 (6)0.0357 (6)0.0209 (5)0.0023 (5)0.0091 (4)0.0006 (4)
C70.0253 (5)0.0280 (5)0.0229 (5)0.0014 (4)0.0045 (4)0.0015 (4)
C80.0315 (6)0.0381 (6)0.0237 (5)0.0046 (5)0.0102 (4)0.0005 (4)
C90.0309 (6)0.0346 (6)0.0232 (5)0.0021 (4)0.0085 (4)0.0021 (4)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
O1—C11.3575 (13)C3—H3B0.9900
O1—C31.4559 (16)C4—C51.3989 (15)
O2—C71.3505 (14)C4—C91.3998 (15)
O2—H20.8400C5—C61.3809 (17)
N1—C11.2775 (14)C5—H50.9500
N1—C21.4769 (15)C6—C71.3982 (15)
C1—C41.4654 (16)C6—H60.9500
C2—C31.5347 (18)C7—C81.4003 (15)
C2—H2A0.9900C8—C91.3818 (16)
C2—H2B0.9900C8—H80.9500
C3—H3A0.9900C9—H90.9500
C1—O1—C3106.53 (9)C5—C4—C9118.51 (11)
C7—O2—H2109.5C5—C4—C1120.76 (10)
C1—N1—C2107.60 (9)C9—C4—C1120.68 (10)
N1—C1—O1117.43 (10)C6—C5—C4120.91 (10)
N1—C1—C4126.39 (10)C6—C5—H5119.5
O1—C1—C4116.16 (10)C4—C5—H5119.5
N1—C2—C3104.09 (10)C5—C6—C7120.45 (10)
N1—C2—H2A110.9C5—C6—H6119.8
C3—C2—H2A110.9C7—C6—H6119.8
N1—C2—H2B110.9O2—C7—C8118.29 (10)
C3—C2—H2B110.9O2—C7—C6122.83 (10)
H2A—C2—H2B109.0C8—C7—C6118.88 (10)
O1—C3—C2104.10 (9)C9—C8—C7120.47 (10)
O1—C3—H3A110.9C9—C8—H8119.8
C2—C3—H3A110.9C7—C8—H8119.8
O1—C3—H3B110.9C8—C9—C4120.77 (10)
C2—C3—H3B110.9C8—C9—H9119.6
H3A—C3—H3B109.0C4—C9—H9119.6
C2—N1—C1—O12.11 (14)C9—C4—C5—C60.52 (18)
C2—N1—C1—C4176.15 (11)C1—C4—C5—C6177.13 (11)
C3—O1—C1—N11.25 (14)C4—C5—C6—C70.18 (19)
C3—O1—C1—C4179.69 (10)C5—C6—C7—O2178.66 (11)
C1—N1—C2—C34.32 (13)C5—C6—C7—C80.95 (18)
C1—O1—C3—C23.83 (13)O2—C7—C8—C9178.61 (11)
N1—C2—C3—O14.86 (13)C6—C7—C8—C91.02 (18)
N1—C1—C4—C5168.38 (12)C7—C8—C9—C40.32 (18)
O1—C1—C4—C59.90 (16)C5—C4—C9—C80.45 (18)
N1—C1—C4—C99.22 (18)C1—C4—C9—C8177.20 (11)
O1—C1—C4—C9172.50 (11)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O2—H2···N1i0.841.862.6997 (13)178
C5—H5···O10.952.462.7874 (15)100
Symmetry code: (i) x1/2, y+3/2, z1/2.

Experimental details

(I)(II)(III)
Crystal data
Chemical formulaC9H9NO2C9H9NO2C9H9NO2
Mr163.17163.17163.17
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/nMonoclinic, P21/cMonoclinic, P21/n
Temperature (K)173173173
a, b, c (Å)5.7562 (1), 11.2464 (1), 12.1365 (1)11.3650 (2), 12.5867 (1), 11.2966 (2)4.7778 (1), 14.9883 (2), 10.9194 (1)
α, β, γ (°)90, 98.162 (1), 9090, 99.534 (1), 9090, 95.945 (1), 90
V3)777.72 (2)1593.63 (4)777.74 (2)
Z484
Radiation typeMo KαMo KαMo Kα
µ (mm1)0.100.100.10
Crystal size (mm)0.80 × 0.42 × 0.400.58 × 0.18 × 0.160.60 × 0.32 × 0.06
Data collection
DiffractometerSiemens SMART CCD area-detector
diffractometer
Siemens SMART CCD area-detector
diffractometer
Siemens SMART CCD area-detector
diffractometer
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 2002)
Multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 2002)
Multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 2002)
Tmin, Tmax0.724, 0.9610.816, 0.9850.710, 0.994
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
13125, 2785, 2451 14444, 2663, 2167 13219, 2784, 2064
Rint0.0260.0560.038
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.7660.5950.768
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.040, 0.119, 1.03 0.068, 0.175, 1.00 0.047, 0.133, 1.02
No. of reflections278526632784
No. of parameters120237119
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrainedH-atom parameters constrainedH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.36, 0.200.39, 0.220.32, 0.21

Computer programs: SMART (Siemens, 1995), SAINT (Siemens, 1995), SAINT and SADABS (Sheldrick, 2002), SHELXTL (Bruker, 2001), SHELXTL, DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2005).

Selected interatomic parameters (Å, °) for compounds (I)–(III) top
(I)(IIA)(IIB)(III)
C1-C41.4619 (10)1.466 (4)1.467 (4)1.4654 (16)
C1-O11.3481 (9)1.356 (3)1.359 (3)1.3575 (13)
C1-N11.2832 (10)1.281 (4)1.276 (4)1.2775 (14)
C2-N1-C1-O10.07 (10)-2.1 (4)-2.8 (4)2.11 (14)
C3-O1-C1-N1-1.64 (10)-2.4 (4)-4.7 (4)1.25 (14)
C1-N1-C2-C31.43 (8)5.5 (3)8.7 (3)-4.32 (13)
C1-O1-C3-C22.32 (8)5.6 (3)9.5 (3)-3.83 (13)
N1-C2-C3-O1-2.27 (8)-6.6 (3)-10.9 (3)4.86 (13)
N1-C1-C4-C9-179.65 (7)173.1 (3)-6.2 (5)-9.22 (18)
O1-C1-C4-C90.06 (10)-5.2 (4)174.9 (3)172.50 (11)
N1-C1-C4-C50.40 (11)-6.9 (4)173.9 (3)168.38 (12)
O1-C1-C4-C5-179.89 (6)174.8 (2)-5.0 (4)-9.90 (16)
Hydrogen-bonding geometry (Å, °) for compounds (I)–(III) top
NotationD—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
(I)O2—H2···N10.841.882.6238 (9)147.5
DFT calculation1.0521.5132.481150.22
(IIa)O2A—H2A···N1Bi0.841.922.732 (3)163.6
DFT calculation1.0281.6192.637169.2
(IIb)O2B—H2B···N1A0.841.882.709 (3)167.0
DFT calculation1.051.5822.615166.97
(IIc)C5B—H5B···O1B0.952.432.764 (4)100.1
DFT calculation1.0832.3842.76798.9
(IId)C7A—H7A···N1Aii0.952.603.540 (4)171.0
DFT calculation1.0972.3753.467175.94
(IIe)C9A—H9A···O1A0.952.452.767 (4)99.6
DFT calculation1.0832.3882.76998.84
(IIIa)O2—H2···N1iii0.841.862.6997 (13)178.0
DFT calculation1.0431.4802.522177.43
(IIIb)C5—H5···O10.952.462.7874 (15)100.1
DFT calculation1.0322.4742.83099.31
Symmetry codes: (i) 2 − x, 1 − y, − z; (ii) 1 − x, 1/2 + y, − 1/2 − z; (iii) x − 1/2, 3/2 − y, z − 1/2.
 

Follow Acta Cryst. C
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds