Download citation
Download citation
link to html
The crystal structure of the title copper(II) complex, [Cu(C18H36N8O4)]SO4·4.5H2O, formed with the tetra­amide cyclam derivative 2-(4,8,11-triscarbamoyl­methyl-1,4,8,11-tetra­aza­cyclo­tetradec-1-yl)­acet­amide (TETAM), is described. The macrocycle lies on an inversion centre occupied by the hexacoordinated Cu atom. The four macrocyclic tertiary amines form the equatorial plane of an axially Jahn–Teller elongated octahedron. Two O atoms belonging to two diagonally opposite amide groups occupy the apical positions, giving rise to a trans-III stereochemistry, while both the remaining pendant side arms extend outwards from the macrocyclic cavity and are engaged in hydrogen bonds with sulfate anions and co-crystallized water mol­ecules.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270101021060/dn1005sup1.cif
Contains datablocks I, global

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270101021060/dn1005Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

CCDC reference: 171781

Comment top

Owing to their novel physico-chemical and structural properties, substituted tetraaza macrocycles have attracted widespread interest and have provided practical solutions to challenging everyday problems, where selective metal-complex formation plays a key role. For example, lanthanide complexes of N-carbamoyl-substituted cyclen derivatives were found to exhibit interesting chiroptical properties (Parker & Williams, 1996) or to promote RNA cleavage efficiently (Amin et al., 1994). In contrast, the 14-membered cyclam analogues bearing dangling amide groups have been studied much less extensively, while crystallographic data are scarce (Meyer et al., 1998). A monoacetamide cyclam-based copper(II) complex has been structurally characterized by means of infrared and visible absorption spectroscopy (Kaden, 1984); the pH-dependent solution behaviour observed suggested the formation of a square-planar tetracoordinated species below pH 10, while apical ligation of the deprotonated amide N atom at higher pH values afforded a pentacoordinated square-pyramidal species. The crystal structure of the title copper(II) complex of 2-(4,8,11-triscarbamoylmethyl-1,4,8,11-tetraazacyclotetradec-1-yl)-acetamide, (I), is reported herein in order to investigate further the structural features related to the presence of pendant acetamide arms attached to the cyclam scaffold. \sch

Compound (I) crystallizes in the centrosymmetric space group C2/c, with half a molecular unit belonging to the asymmetric unit. The second half unit is generated by an inversion centre at (3/4, 1/4, 1/2), which is occupied by the Cu atom, leading to a planar N4 basal coordination. According to the extended Dale nomenclature developed for heteroatom-containing macrocycles (Meyer et al., 1998), the cyclam fragment exhibits an anangular [3',4',3',4']-C ring conformation with four pseudocorners located at C1, C4, and the symmetry-related atoms C1' and C4', delimiting a parallelogram of 4.98 (C1···C4) by 3.84 Å (C1···C4') with a C4···C1···C4' angle of 99.4°. Starting at τ1, defined as the N1—C1—C2—N2 torsion angle, the following sequence along the cycle is observed: 59.2 (2), -169.6 (1), 175.6 (2), -66.2 (2), 67.3 (2), -174.2 (1) and 157.9 (1)°. It can be easily observed that this macrocyclic conformation forces the amine N atoms to adopt a type-III configuration according to Bosnich's formalism (Bosnich et al., 1965; Frémond et al., 2000), which results in a trans layout of the four acetamide substituents. The five- and six-membered chelate rings have been characterized by puckering analysis (Cremer & Pople, 1975). For both independent five-membered chelate rings (N1—C1—C2—N2—Cu and N2—C21—C22—O22—Cu), the closest pucker descriptor is a half-chair twisted along C1—C2 (Q = 0.465 Å and ϕ = 91.8°) and N2—C21 (Q = 0.238 Å and ϕ = 311.0°), respectively. The six-membered chelate ring (N2—C3—C4—C5—N1'-Cu) exhibits a chair conformation, in agreement with the observed puckering parameters (Q = 0.657 Å, θ = 174.6° and ϕ = 166.0°). The average bond distances [Csp3—Csp3 = 1.520 (5) Å and Csp3—N = 1.493 (5) Å] are typical of tetraaza macrocycles (Meyer et al., 1998).

The coordination sphere around the metal centre exhibits a distorted octahedral geometry. The distances and angles within the basal plane reveal a regular rectangular arrangement of the four N atoms [Cu—N1 = 2.152 (1) Å, Cu—N2 = 2.049 (2) Å and N1—Cu—N2 = 86.24 (5)°]. Two acetamide O atoms complete the octahedron at the apical positions [Cu—O22 = 2.356 (1) Å, N1—Cu—O22 = 85.72 (4)° and N2—Cu—O22 = 78.49 (5)°]. The axial elongation results from the well known Jahn-Teller effect. The acetamide CO groups show a double-bond character whether the carbonyl is coordinated [1.241 (2) Å] or not [1.231 (2) Å]. The calculated N2/C21/C22/(N23,O22) mean plane exhibits a higher r.m.s. deviation (0.1346 Å) than the one corresponding to N1/C11/C12/(N13,O12) (0.0972 Å), due to the Cu—O22 interaction. The angle between these mean planes [88.71 (6)°] is very close to the N1—Cu—N2 coordination angle [86.24 (5)°].

The hydrogen-bonding pattern found in the structure of (I) seems responsible for the above arrangement. In particular, the specific orientation of the uncoordinated acetamide moiety is due to the N13—H131···OW1—HW11···O12 hydrogen bonds, which involve a water molecule as both acceptor and donor in the same asymmetric unit (Table 1). The sulfate anions bridge the complexes and water molecules by means of their O atoms, giving rise to a hydrogen-bond network. Indeed, they act as acceptors in medium strength interactions (H···O 1.783–2.052 Å).

In order to obtain a more accurate description of the amide and water H atoms, their bond distances were restrained to the mean values derived from neutron experiments: N—H = 1.009 Å (Wilson & Prince, 1999) and OW—HW = 0.970 Å (Blessing, 1988). Table 1 shows the dissociation energies (DE) corresponding to the N—H···O and OW—HW···O contacts, which were calculated according to the simple expression obtained for X—H···O (X is C, N or O) closed-shell hydrogen-bond interactions: DE (kJ mol1) = 25000 × exp[-3.6 × d(H···O) (Å)] (Espinosa et al., 1998). At this stage, it has to be noted that weaker C—H···O interactions have not been taken into account. Inspection of the DE values reported in Table 1 leads to an estimated interaction energy between the OW1 water molecule and the C11/C12/(O12,N13) acetamide group of roughly 33 kJ mol1. The interaction energy corresponding to a sulfate anion bridging TETAM and water molecules is approximately 134 kJ mol1. Thus, it might be concluded that the crystal cohesion in (I) is mainly ensured by the hydrogen-bond network involving the sulfate counter-ions.

Experimental top

The free ligand TETAM was prepared according to the method of Guilard et al. (2001). A methanol solution (20 ml) containing CuSO4·5H2O (180 mg, 0.72 mmol) and TETAM (300 mg, 0.70 mmol) was stirred for 30 min at room temperature. Evaporation of the solvent afforded a blue solid, (I), which was recrystallized in a water-methanol mixture (1:1 v/v). X-ray quality crystals of (I) were obtained by slow evaporation of this mixture at room temperature.

Refinement top

All H atoms (except those of the disordered water molecule) were found in the difference Fourier map and refined with a global isotropic displacement parameter of 0.038 (1) Å2. The positions of the H(—N) and HW atoms were constrained using the DFIX and DANG (only for HW atoms) instructions of the SHELXL97 program (Sheldrick, 1997). A disordered water molecule was found in the structure, exhibiting a site occupancy factor of 0.25. The corresponding atom OW3 is located 2.757, 2.868 and 2.969 Å from two equivalent O12 atoms and a symmetry-related OW3 atom, respectively. Since atoms HW31 and HW32 were not found, the corresponding data have not been included in Table 1.

Computing details top

Data collection: KappaCCD Server Software (Nonius, 1997); cell refinement: DENZO (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997); data reduction: DENZO; program(s) used to solve structure: SIR92 (Altomare et al., 1993); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. A view of the cation of (I) showing the atom-numbering scheme and with 50% probability displacement ellipsoids. For sake of clarity, H atoms have been omitted.
[(1,4,8,11-tetraazacyclotetradeca-1,4,8,11-tetrayl)tetraacetamide- κ6N1,N4,N8,N11,O1,O8]copper(II) sulfate 4.5-hydrate top
Crystal data top
[Cu(C18H36N8O4)]SO4·4.5H2OF(000) = 1416
Mr = 669.22Cell parameters refined using SCALEPACK part of DENZO (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997).
Monoclinic, C2/cDx = 1.568 Mg m3
Hall symbol: -C 2ycMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 18.8609 (3) ÅCell parameters from 12370 reflections
b = 15.4691 (4) Åθ = 1.4–27.6°
c = 11.6010 (2) ŵ = 0.92 mm1
β = 123.145 (9)°T = 173 K
V = 2833.99 (10) Å3Prism, dark blue
Z = 40.2 × 0.2 × 0.2 mm
Data collection top
Nonius KappaCCD area-detector
diffractometer
2814 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tubeRint = 0.027
Graphite monochromatorθmax = 27.6°, θmin = 3.4°
ϕ scansh = 024
12370 measured reflectionsk = 019
3235 independent reflectionsl = 1512
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.037H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.113 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0856P)2]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.09(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
3235 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.72 e Å3
260 parametersΔρmin = 0.62 e Å3
10 restraintsExtinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction coefficient: 0.0073 (9)
Crystal data top
[Cu(C18H36N8O4)]SO4·4.5H2OV = 2833.99 (10) Å3
Mr = 669.22Z = 4
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation
a = 18.8609 (3) ŵ = 0.92 mm1
b = 15.4691 (4) ÅT = 173 K
c = 11.6010 (2) Å0.2 × 0.2 × 0.2 mm
β = 123.145 (9)°
Data collection top
Nonius KappaCCD area-detector
diffractometer
2814 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
12370 measured reflectionsRint = 0.027
3235 independent reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.03710 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.113H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.09Δρmax = 0.72 e Å3
3235 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.62 e Å3
260 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/UeqOcc. (<1)
Cu0.75000.25000.50000.02178 (14)
N10.68238 (8)0.12936 (9)0.43164 (14)0.0244 (3)
N20.72349 (10)0.24882 (8)0.64928 (16)0.0228 (3)
C10.63774 (10)0.12574 (11)0.50541 (18)0.0274 (3)
C20.69670 (11)0.15814 (11)0.65100 (18)0.0284 (4)
C30.80044 (11)0.26758 (13)0.78898 (18)0.0290 (4)
C40.84142 (11)0.35537 (12)0.80452 (17)0.0307 (4)
C50.88070 (11)0.36818 (12)0.72099 (17)0.0286 (4)
C110.74237 (10)0.05608 (11)0.47609 (19)0.0266 (3)
C120.70588 (11)0.03519 (11)0.45356 (18)0.0280 (4)
O120.63074 (8)0.05338 (8)0.37207 (16)0.0408 (3)
N130.76542 (10)0.09446 (10)0.52979 (18)0.0321 (3)
C210.65330 (10)0.30842 (11)0.61847 (17)0.0252 (3)
C220.59261 (10)0.32408 (10)0.46578 (17)0.0239 (3)
O220.61532 (7)0.31541 (8)0.38419 (12)0.0261 (3)
N230.51561 (9)0.34921 (11)0.42823 (15)0.0319 (3)
H10.7877 (15)0.0643 (15)0.575 (2)0.0383 (12)*
H20.7676 (13)0.0567 (14)0.423 (2)0.0383 (12)*
H30.6219 (13)0.0671 (14)0.504 (2)0.0383 (12)*
H40.5878 (15)0.1662 (15)0.450 (2)0.0383 (12)*
H50.7491 (14)0.1209 (15)0.700 (2)0.0383 (12)*
H60.6683 (14)0.1563 (15)0.696 (2)0.0383 (12)*
H70.6758 (14)0.3668 (15)0.660 (2)0.0383 (12)*
H80.6230 (14)0.2871 (16)0.656 (2)0.0383 (12)*
H90.8445 (14)0.2231 (16)0.813 (2)0.0383 (12)*
H100.7811 (15)0.2642 (14)0.852 (3)0.0383 (12)*
H110.8878 (14)0.3596 (14)0.900 (2)0.0383 (12)*
H120.8026 (14)0.4059 (16)0.788 (2)0.0383 (12)*
H130.9190 (13)0.3148 (15)0.736 (2)0.0383 (12)*
H140.9171 (13)0.4184 (14)0.751 (2)0.0383 (12)*
H1310.7509 (11)0.1578 (3)0.511 (2)0.0383 (12)*
H1320.8241 (6)0.0716 (14)0.5979 (18)0.0383 (12)*
H2310.4731 (10)0.3669 (14)0.3300 (8)0.0383 (12)*
H2320.5062 (14)0.3625 (14)0.5040 (16)0.0383 (12)*
S1.00000.07390 (4)0.75000.02473 (16)
O10.96754 (8)0.12914 (9)0.62661 (12)0.0325 (3)
O20.93037 (8)0.01978 (9)0.73052 (14)0.0371 (3)
OW10.63414 (10)0.23629 (9)0.37416 (16)0.0365 (3)
HW110.6109 (10)0.1785 (4)0.361 (2)0.0383 (12)*
HW120.5909 (8)0.2781 (8)0.356 (2)0.0383 (12)*
OW20.35575 (8)0.47418 (9)0.36816 (14)0.0351 (3)
HW210.3902 (8)0.4901 (14)0.3330 (16)0.0383 (12)*
HW220.3914 (8)0.4463 (12)0.4569 (10)0.0383 (12)*
OW30.0088 (4)0.4298 (5)0.0952 (6)0.0516 (16)0.25
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cu0.0233 (2)0.02190 (19)0.02179 (19)0.00166 (8)0.01339 (16)0.00045 (8)
N10.0235 (7)0.0244 (7)0.0250 (7)0.0015 (5)0.0130 (6)0.0001 (5)
N20.0231 (8)0.0240 (7)0.0213 (7)0.0029 (4)0.0120 (7)0.0011 (4)
C10.0272 (9)0.0254 (8)0.0333 (9)0.0007 (6)0.0190 (8)0.0004 (6)
C20.0339 (9)0.0264 (8)0.0300 (8)0.0029 (6)0.0207 (8)0.0039 (6)
C30.0285 (10)0.0358 (9)0.0195 (8)0.0037 (7)0.0111 (8)0.0017 (6)
C40.0283 (9)0.0360 (10)0.0236 (8)0.0004 (6)0.0114 (8)0.0046 (6)
C50.0245 (9)0.0308 (8)0.0258 (8)0.0010 (6)0.0107 (7)0.0025 (6)
C110.0247 (9)0.0223 (8)0.0322 (8)0.0008 (5)0.0152 (8)0.0009 (6)
C120.0316 (9)0.0250 (8)0.0323 (9)0.0007 (6)0.0205 (8)0.0020 (6)
O120.0302 (7)0.0301 (7)0.0489 (8)0.0038 (5)0.0133 (7)0.0032 (6)
N130.0325 (7)0.0240 (7)0.0406 (8)0.0019 (6)0.0205 (7)0.0040 (6)
C210.0261 (8)0.0279 (8)0.0251 (7)0.0036 (6)0.0161 (7)0.0014 (6)
C220.0244 (8)0.0218 (7)0.0267 (8)0.0010 (5)0.0148 (7)0.0002 (6)
O220.0269 (6)0.0275 (6)0.0260 (6)0.0038 (4)0.0159 (5)0.0023 (4)
N230.0248 (8)0.0444 (9)0.0272 (7)0.0079 (6)0.0146 (7)0.0020 (6)
S0.0241 (3)0.0270 (3)0.0241 (3)0.0000.0138 (3)0.000
O10.0373 (7)0.0355 (7)0.0287 (6)0.0030 (5)0.0206 (6)0.0055 (5)
O20.0312 (7)0.0422 (8)0.0362 (7)0.0087 (5)0.0173 (6)0.0025 (5)
OW10.0424 (8)0.0294 (6)0.0410 (8)0.0055 (5)0.0250 (7)0.0037 (5)
OW20.0332 (7)0.0390 (7)0.0361 (7)0.0013 (5)0.0208 (6)0.0016 (5)
OW30.031 (3)0.075 (5)0.035 (3)0.002 (3)0.009 (3)0.009 (3)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Cu—N2i2.0484 (15)C5—H131.05 (2)
Cu—N22.0484 (15)C5—H140.97 (2)
Cu—N12.1521 (14)C11—C121.529 (2)
Cu—N1i2.1521 (14)C11—H10.99 (2)
Cu—O22i2.3557 (11)C11—H20.96 (2)
Cu—O222.3557 (11)C12—O121.231 (2)
N1—C111.481 (2)C12—N131.341 (2)
N1—C11.494 (2)N13—H1311.0087 (10)
N1—C5i1.500 (2)N13—H1321.0087 (11)
N2—C211.488 (2)C21—C221.513 (2)
N2—C21.495 (2)C21—H71.00 (2)
N2—C31.498 (2)C21—H80.95 (2)
C1—C21.512 (2)C22—O221.241 (2)
C1—H30.95 (2)C22—N231.326 (2)
C1—H41.02 (2)N23—H2311.0086 (10)
C2—H51.01 (2)N23—H2321.0087 (10)
C2—H60.93 (2)S—O2ii1.4670 (12)
C3—C41.524 (3)S—O21.4670 (12)
C3—H90.99 (2)S—O11.4818 (13)
C3—H100.98 (3)S—O1ii1.4818 (13)
C4—C51.521 (2)OW1—HW110.9697 (10)
C4—H110.97 (2)OW1—HW120.9697 (10)
C4—H121.02 (2)OW2—HW210.9699 (10)
C5—N1i1.500 (2)OW2—HW220.9699 (10)
N2i—Cu—N2180.0C5—C4—C3115.66 (15)
N2i—Cu—N193.76 (5)C5—C4—H11105.6 (13)
N2—Cu—N186.24 (5)C3—C4—H11106.2 (13)
N2i—Cu—N1i86.24 (5)C5—C4—H12109.6 (12)
N2—Cu—N1i93.76 (5)C3—C4—H12113.3 (13)
N1—Cu—N1i180.00 (4)H11—C4—H12105.6 (17)
N2i—Cu—O22i78.49 (5)N1i—C5—C4114.02 (13)
N2—Cu—O22i101.51 (5)N1i—C5—H13104.4 (12)
N1—Cu—O22i94.28 (5)C4—C5—H13108.7 (12)
N1i—Cu—O22i85.72 (5)N1i—C5—H14110.7 (14)
N2i—Cu—O22101.51 (5)C4—C5—H14111.9 (14)
N2—Cu—O2278.49 (5)H13—C5—H14106.6 (17)
N1—Cu—O2285.72 (5)N1—C11—C12117.40 (13)
N1i—Cu—O2294.28 (5)N1—C11—H1108.3 (13)
O22i—Cu—O22180.00 (7)C12—C11—H1109.8 (13)
C11—N1—C1109.54 (13)N1—C11—H2108.8 (13)
C11—N1—C5i113.11 (13)C12—C11—H2103.5 (13)
C1—N1—C5i110.21 (12)H1—C11—H2108.7 (18)
C11—N1—Cu110.45 (10)O12—C12—N13123.19 (16)
C1—N1—Cu103.15 (9)O12—C12—C11124.32 (16)
C5i—N1—Cu109.93 (10)N13—C12—C11112.46 (15)
C21—N2—C2108.77 (14)C12—N13—H131119.4 (11)
C21—N2—C3110.38 (13)C12—N13—H132116.3 (13)
C2—N2—C3107.57 (13)H131—N13—H132124.1 (17)
C21—N2—Cu112.82 (10)N2—C21—C22112.62 (13)
C2—N2—Cu105.08 (10)N2—C21—H7110.8 (13)
C3—N2—Cu111.90 (11)C22—C21—H7105.4 (13)
N1—C1—C2109.08 (13)N2—C21—H8110.8 (14)
N1—C1—H3107.5 (13)C22—C21—H8109.6 (13)
C2—C1—H3111.2 (14)H7—C21—H8107.3 (19)
N1—C1—H4103.3 (13)O22—C22—N23123.62 (15)
C2—C1—H4111.5 (13)O22—C22—C21121.33 (13)
H3—C1—H4113.8 (17)N23—C22—C21115.03 (14)
N2—C2—C1110.10 (14)C22—O22—Cu109.00 (10)
N2—C2—H5107.9 (13)C22—N23—H231120.1 (12)
C1—C2—H5109.4 (13)C22—N23—H232117.2 (13)
N2—C2—H6109.8 (14)H231—N23—H232121.3 (18)
C1—C2—H6108.4 (14)O2ii—S—O2110.41 (12)
H5—C2—H6111.2 (18)O2ii—S—O1109.90 (7)
N2—C3—C4115.42 (14)O2—S—O1108.54 (7)
N2—C3—H9109.7 (14)O2ii—S—O1ii108.54 (7)
C4—C3—H9107.0 (14)O2—S—O1ii109.90 (7)
N2—C3—H10105.1 (14)O1—S—O1ii109.56 (11)
C4—C3—H10109.3 (13)HW11—OW1—HW12109.01 (16)
H9—C3—H10110.3 (18)HW21—OW2—HW22108.95 (16)
N1—C1—C2—N259.12 (17)N1i—C1i—C2i—N2i59.12 (17)
C1—C2—N2—C3162.62 (14)C1i—C2i—N2i—C3i162.62 (13)
C2—N2—C3—C4175.60 (15)C2i—N2i—C3i—C4i175.60 (15)
N2—C3—C4—C566.2 (2)N2i—C3i—C4i—C5i66.2 (2)
C3—C4—C5—N1i67.3 (2)C3i—C4i—C5i—N167.3 (2)
C4—C5—N1i—C1i174.20 (14)C4i—C5i—N1—C1174.20 (14)
C5—N1i—C1i—C2i157.90 (14)C5i—N1—C1—C2157.90 (14)
Symmetry codes: (i) x+3/2, y+1/2, z+1; (ii) x+2, y, z+3/2.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N13—H131···OW11.01 (1)2.24 (1)3.052 (2)137 (1)
N13—H131···OW1iii1.01 (1)2.45 (2)3.062 (2)119 (1)
N13—H132···O21.01 (2)1.91 (2)2.918 (2)175 (2)
N23—H231···O22iv1.01 (1)2.25 (1)3.118 (2)143 (2)
N23—H232···O1v1.01 (2)1.93 (2)2.918 (2)167 (2)
OW1—HW11···O120.97 (1)1.96 (1)2.830 (2)148 (1)
OW1—HW12···O1iii0.97 (2)1.89 (2)2.827 (2)163 (2)
OW2—HW21···O2vi0.97 (2)1.78 (2)2.736 (2)167 (1)
OW2—HW22···O1v0.97 (1)2.05 (1)3.013 (2)171 (2)
Symmetry codes: (iii) x+3/2, y1/2, z+1; (iv) x+1, y, z+1/2; (v) x1/2, y+1/2, z; (vi) x1/2, y+1/2, z1/2.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula[Cu(C18H36N8O4)]SO4·4.5H2O
Mr669.22
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, C2/c
Temperature (K)173
a, b, c (Å)18.8609 (3), 15.4691 (4), 11.6010 (2)
β (°) 123.145 (9)
V3)2833.99 (10)
Z4
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)0.92
Crystal size (mm)0.2 × 0.2 × 0.2
Data collection
DiffractometerNonius KappaCCD area-detector
diffractometer
Absorption correction
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
12370, 3235, 2814
Rint0.027
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.652
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.037, 0.113, 1.09
No. of reflections3235
No. of parameters260
No. of restraints10
H-atom treatmentH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.72, 0.62

Computer programs: KappaCCD Server Software (Nonius, 1997), DENZO (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997), DENZO, SIR92 (Altomare et al., 1993), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997), WinGX (Farrugia, 1999).

Hydrogen bonding geometry (Å,°) and estimated dissociation energies DE (kJmol-1) top
D-H···AD-HH···AD···AD-H···ADE
N13-H131···OW11.009 (7)2.24 (1)3.052 (2)137 (1)7.9
N13-H131···OW1i1.009 (7)2.45 (2)3.062 (2)119 (1)3.7
N13-H132···O21.009 (18)1.912 (18)2.918 (2)175 (2)25.6
N23-H231···O22ii1.009 (10)2.25 (1)3.118 (2)143 (2)7.6
N23-H232···O1iii1.01 (2)1.93 (2)2.918 (2)167 (2)24.0
OW1-HW11···O120.970 (10)1.963 (9)2.830 (2)148 (1)21.3
OW1-HW12···O1i0.969 (17)1.886 (16)2.827 (2)163 (2)28.1
OW2-HW21···O2iv0.969 (18)1.784 (18)2.736 (2)167 (1)40.6
OW2-HW22···O1iii0.970 (12)2.051 (14)3.013 (2)171 (2)15.5
%T {σymcodesfn (i) ${σcriptscriptstyle{3οver 2}}-x, -{σcriptscriptstyle{1οver 2}}-y,1-z$; (ii) $1-x,y, {σcriptscriptstyle{1οver 2}}-z$; (iii) $x-{σcriptscriptstyle{1οver 2}},{σcriptscriptstyle{1οver 2}}+y,z$; (iv) $x-{σcriptscriptstyle{1οver 2}},{σcriptscriptstyle{1οver 2}}-y,z-{σcriptscriptstyle{1οver 2}}$.πar}
 

Follow Acta Cryst. C
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds