metal-organic compounds\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890

catena-Poly[[di­aqua­zinc(II)]-μ-piper­azine-1,4-di­acetato-κ4N1,O1:N4,O4]

aDeparment of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hefei Normal University, Hefei 230061, People's Republic of China
*Correspondence e-mail: bi010101@126.com

(Received 24 October 2009; accepted 29 October 2009; online 11 November 2009)

The asymmetric unit of the title compound, [Zn(C8H12N2O4)(H2O)2]n, contains a ZnII ion residing on an inversion center, half of a centrosymmetric piperazine-1,4-diacetate ligand (L) and a water mol­ecule. The ZnII ion is trans-coordinated by two N,O-bidentate L ligands and by two water mol­ecules in a distorted octa­hedral geometry. In the crystal structure, inter­molecular O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds link polymeric chains into a three-dimensional supra­molecular structure.

Related literature

For related structures, see: Wu & Mak (1996[Wu, D. D. & Mak, T. C. W. (1996). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 253, m15-m21.]); Zhang & Chen (2003[Zhang, X. M. & Chen, X. M. (2003). Inorg. Chem. Commun. 6, m206-m209.]); Shen et al. (2006[Shen, L., Wang, F.-W., Cheng, A.-B. & Yang, S. (2006). Acta Cryst. E62, o2242-o2244.]); Yang et al. (2008[Yang, J., Lu, N., Zhang, G., Cheng, L. & Gou, S. H. (2008). Polyhedron, 27, m2119-m2126.]); Zhang et al. (2008[Zhang, R. F., Shi, W. & Cheng, P. (2008). Chin. J. Inorg. Chem. 24, m1272-m1277.]).

[Scheme 1]

Experimental

Crystal data
  • [Zn(C8H12N2O4)(H2O)2]

  • Mr = 301.62

  • Monoclinic, P 21 /c

  • a = 6.3670 (1) Å

  • b = 7.3116 (10) Å

  • c = 11.9910 (1) Å

  • β = 101.438 (10)°

  • V = 547.13 (1) Å3

  • Z = 2

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 2.27 mm−1

  • T = 291 K

  • 0.30 × 0.15 × 0.12 mm

Data collection
  • Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2000[Bruker (2000). SADABS, SMART and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]) Tmin = 0.517, Tmax = 0.766

  • 5254 measured reflections

  • 1255 independent reflections

  • 1173 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • Rint = 0.014

Refinement
  • R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.018

  • wR(F2) = 0.050

  • S = 1.07

  • 1255 reflections

  • 87 parameters

  • 2 restraints

  • H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement

  • Δρmax = 0.35 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.17 e Å−3

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O3—H3A⋯O1i 0.813 (19) 2.000 (19) 2.8060 (16) 172.9 (19)
O3—H3B⋯O1ii 0.826 (15) 1.927 (15) 2.7497 (15) 175 (2)
Symmetry codes: (i) [x, -y+{\script{1\over 2}}, z+{\script{1\over 2}}]; (ii) -x+1, -y+1, -z+1.

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2000[Bruker (2000). SADABS, SMART and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2000[Bruker (2000). SADABS, SMART and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL; molecular graphics: SHELXTL; software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL.

Supporting information


Comment top

Researchers have shown their interest in design and synthesis of polydentate flexible ligands, which propagated a family of piperazine-based ligands, because the chair configuration of piperazine can reduce their coordination modes, which makes piperazine or its related species structurally or functionally directing polymeric constructions (Shen et al., 2006; Wu et al., 1996; Yang et al., 2008; Zhang et al., 2008; Zhang et al., 2003). Herein, based on bridging 1,4-piperazinediacetic acid, we report the title compound and present its crystal structure.

The coordination geometry about Zn(II) center is shown in Fig.1. The Zn(II) center adopts an octahedral coordination geometry, in which two N atoms and two O atoms from two ligands are in the equatorial plane while the apical positions are occupied by two O atoms from water molecules. Intermolecular O—H···O hydrogen bonds (Table 1) link polymeric chains into three-dimensional supramolecular structure.

Related literature top

For related structures, see: Wu & Mak (1996); Zhang & Chen (2003); Shen et al. (2006); Yang et al. (2008); Zhang et al. (2008).

Experimental top

All solvents and chemicals were of analytical grade and were used without further purification. A mixture of H2L.2HCl (0.1 mmol), ZnCl2 (0.1 mmol), and water (10 ml) were heated in a 15-ml Teflon-lined vessel at 120 oC for 3 days, followed by slow cooling (5 oC h-1) to room temperature. After filtration and washing with H2O, colorless block crystals were collected and dried in air. Anal. Calcd.for C8H16N2O6Zn: C, 31.86; H, 5.35; N, 9.29. Found: C, 31.88; H,5.39; N, 9.22.

Refinement top

C-bound H atoms weregeometrically positioned (C—H 0.93–0.97 Å) and refined as riding, with Uiso(H)=1.2Ueq(C). Atoms H3A and H3B were located on a difference map, and refined with bond restraint O—H = 0.82 (2) Å as riding, with Uiso(H)=Ueq(O).

Computing details top

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2000); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2000); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2000); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. A portion of the polymeric chain in (I) showing 30% probability displacement ellipsoids and the atomic numbering [symmetry codes: (A) 1 - x, -y, 1 - z; (B) -x, -y, 1 - z].
catena-Poly[[diaquazinc(II)]-µ-piperazine-1,4-diacetato- κ4N1,O1:N4,O4] top
Crystal data top
[Zn(C8H12N2O4)(H2O)2]F(000) = 312.0
Mr = 301.62Dx = 1.831 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 1255 reflections
a = 6.3670 (1) Åθ = 3.3–27.5°
b = 7.3116 (1) ŵ = 2.27 mm1
c = 11.9910 (1) ÅT = 291 K
β = 101.438 (1)°Block, colourless
V = 547.13 (1) Å30.30 × 0.15 × 0.12 mm
Z = 2
Data collection top
Bruker SMART CCD area-detector
diffractometer
1255 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1173 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.014
ϕ and ω scansθmax = 27.5°, θmin = 3.3°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2000)
h = 88
Tmin = 0.517, Tmax = 0.766k = 79
5254 measured reflectionsl = 1512
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.018Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.050H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.07 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0264P)2 + 0.2196P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1255 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
87 parametersΔρmax = 0.35 e Å3
2 restraintsΔρmin = 0.17 e Å3
Crystal data top
[Zn(C8H12N2O4)(H2O)2]V = 547.13 (1) Å3
Mr = 301.62Z = 2
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation
a = 6.3670 (1) ŵ = 2.27 mm1
b = 7.3116 (1) ÅT = 291 K
c = 11.9910 (1) Å0.30 × 0.15 × 0.12 mm
β = 101.438 (1)°
Data collection top
Bruker SMART CCD area-detector
diffractometer
1255 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2000)
1173 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.517, Tmax = 0.766Rint = 0.014
5254 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0182 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.050H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.07Δρmax = 0.35 e Å3
1255 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.17 e Å3
87 parameters
Special details top

Experimental. The structure was solved by direct methods (Bruker, 2000) and successive difference Fourier syntheses.

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.3930 (2)0.34321 (18)0.39316 (11)0.0202 (3)
C20.2110 (2)0.32565 (19)0.45839 (13)0.0246 (3)
H2A0.24840.39360.52900.029*
H2B0.08260.38040.41370.029*
C30.0594 (2)0.1341 (2)0.58516 (12)0.0223 (3)
H3C0.06580.21270.57010.027*
H3D0.15810.18310.65050.027*
C40.0075 (2)0.0568 (2)0.38757 (12)0.0221 (3)
H4A0.07140.05280.32060.026*
H4B0.11790.13500.37090.026*
H3A0.547 (3)0.101 (3)0.7111 (15)0.043 (6)*
H3B0.607 (3)0.255 (2)0.6608 (17)0.042 (6)*
N10.16401 (17)0.13433 (15)0.48462 (10)0.0198 (2)
O10.3977 (2)0.48174 (13)0.33348 (10)0.0299 (2)
O20.53370 (15)0.22018 (14)0.40554 (9)0.0263 (2)
O30.59517 (17)0.14245 (15)0.65815 (9)0.0265 (2)
Zn10.50000.00000.50000.02027 (9)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.0241 (6)0.0172 (6)0.0196 (6)0.0029 (5)0.0052 (5)0.0009 (5)
C20.0228 (6)0.0188 (7)0.0346 (8)0.0020 (5)0.0116 (6)0.0021 (6)
C30.0198 (6)0.0264 (7)0.0224 (7)0.0021 (5)0.0080 (5)0.0027 (5)
C40.0188 (6)0.0276 (7)0.0205 (6)0.0001 (5)0.0054 (5)0.0020 (6)
N10.0185 (5)0.0198 (5)0.0228 (6)0.0020 (4)0.0081 (4)0.0006 (4)
O10.0418 (6)0.0197 (5)0.0307 (6)0.0016 (4)0.0131 (5)0.0068 (4)
O20.0255 (5)0.0224 (5)0.0351 (6)0.0040 (4)0.0162 (4)0.0083 (4)
O30.0328 (5)0.0225 (5)0.0270 (5)0.0011 (4)0.0125 (4)0.0019 (4)
Zn10.02321 (13)0.01652 (13)0.02233 (13)0.00056 (7)0.00751 (9)0.00295 (8)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
C1—O11.2439 (17)C4—C3i1.514 (2)
C1—O21.2575 (16)C4—H4A0.9700
C1—C21.5269 (18)C4—H4B0.9700
C2—N11.4773 (17)N1—Zn12.3278 (11)
C2—H2A0.9700O2—Zn12.0042 (10)
C2—H2B0.9700O3—Zn12.1430 (11)
C3—N11.4884 (16)O3—H3A0.814 (15)
C3—C4i1.514 (2)O3—H3B0.825 (16)
C3—H3C0.9700Zn1—O2ii2.0042 (10)
C3—H3D0.9700Zn1—O3ii2.1430 (11)
C4—N11.4864 (18)Zn1—N1ii2.3278 (11)
O1—C1—O2123.53 (12)C4—N1—C3107.18 (10)
O1—C1—C2118.08 (12)C2—N1—Zn1101.23 (7)
O2—C1—C2118.34 (12)C4—N1—Zn1111.36 (8)
N1—C2—C1113.26 (11)C3—N1—Zn1119.15 (8)
N1—C2—H2A108.9C1—O2—Zn1119.19 (8)
C1—C2—H2A108.9Zn1—O3—H3A115.2 (15)
N1—C2—H2B108.9Zn1—O3—H3B121.7 (14)
C1—C2—H2B108.9H3A—O3—H3B112 (2)
H2A—C2—H2B107.7O2ii—Zn1—O2180.0
N1—C3—C4i111.49 (11)O2ii—Zn1—O386.18 (4)
N1—C3—H3C109.3O2—Zn1—O393.82 (4)
C4i—C3—H3C109.3O2ii—Zn1—O3ii93.82 (4)
N1—C3—H3D109.3O2—Zn1—O3ii86.18 (4)
C4i—C3—H3D109.3O3—Zn1—O3ii180.0
H3C—C3—H3D108.0O2ii—Zn1—N1100.60 (4)
N1—C4—C3i110.87 (11)O2—Zn1—N179.40 (4)
N1—C4—H4A109.5O3—Zn1—N187.66 (4)
C3i—C4—H4A109.5O3ii—Zn1—N192.34 (4)
N1—C4—H4B109.5O2ii—Zn1—N1ii79.40 (4)
C3i—C4—H4B109.5O2—Zn1—N1ii100.60 (4)
H4A—C4—H4B108.1O3—Zn1—N1ii92.34 (4)
C2—N1—C4109.09 (11)O3ii—Zn1—N1ii87.66 (4)
C2—N1—C3108.39 (10)N1—Zn1—N1ii180.00 (6)
Symmetry codes: (i) x, y, z+1; (ii) x+1, y, z+1.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O3—H3A···O1iii0.81 (2)2.00 (2)2.8060 (16)173 (2)
O3—H3B···O1iv0.83 (2)1.93 (2)2.7497 (15)175 (2)
Symmetry codes: (iii) x, y+1/2, z+1/2; (iv) x+1, y+1, z+1.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula[Zn(C8H12N2O4)(H2O)2]
Mr301.62
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/c
Temperature (K)291
a, b, c (Å)6.3670 (1), 7.3116 (1), 11.9910 (1)
β (°) 101.438 (1)
V3)547.13 (1)
Z2
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)2.27
Crystal size (mm)0.30 × 0.15 × 0.12
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker SMART CCD area-detector
diffractometer
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2000)
Tmin, Tmax0.517, 0.766
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
5254, 1255, 1173
Rint0.014
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.649
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.018, 0.050, 1.07
No. of reflections1255
No. of parameters87
No. of restraints2
H-atom treatmentH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.35, 0.17

Computer programs: SMART (Bruker, 2000), SAINT (Bruker, 2000), SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008).

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O3—H3A···O1i0.813 (19)2.000 (19)2.8060 (16)172.9 (19)
O3—H3B···O1ii0.826 (15)1.927 (15)2.7497 (15)175 (2)
Symmetry codes: (i) x, y+1/2, z+1/2; (ii) x+1, y+1, z+1.
 

Acknowledgements

The author is indebted to the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant No. 20871039) for financial support.

References

First citationBruker (2000). SADABS, SMART and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.  Google Scholar
First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationShen, L., Wang, F.-W., Cheng, A.-B. & Yang, S. (2006). Acta Cryst. E62, o2242–o2244.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationWu, D. D. & Mak, T. C. W. (1996). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 253, m15–m21.  CSD CrossRef Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationYang, J., Lu, N., Zhang, G., Cheng, L. & Gou, S. H. (2008). Polyhedron, 27, m2119–m2126.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef Google Scholar
First citationZhang, X. M. & Chen, X. M. (2003). Inorg. Chem. Commun. 6, m206–m209.  CSD CrossRef Google Scholar
First citationZhang, R. F., Shi, W. & Cheng, P. (2008). Chin. J. Inorg. Chem. 24, m1272–m1277.  Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds