Buy article online - an online subscription or single-article purchase is required to access this article.
Download citation
Download citation
link to html
It is shown that when the observed and calculated intensities in a powder diffraction pattern differ because of model errors which affect the calculated integrated intensities, in addition to the random counting errors, Rietveld refinement with weights determined solely by counting statistics yields estimated standard deviations for the crystal structure parameters which tend to be measures of the precision rather than the accuracy of these parameters. Under these conditions, e.s.d.'s calculated by Rietveld refinement may be significantly smaller than those obtained by integrated intensity refinement of the same data set. A method of adjusting Rietveld e.s.d.'s, to provide comparability with integrated intensity refinement, is proposed.

Subscribe to Journal of Applied Crystallography

The full text of this article is available to subscribers to the journal.

If you have already registered and are using a computer listed in your registration details, please email support@iucr.org for assistance.

Buy online

You may purchase this article in PDF and/or HTML formats. For purchasers in the European Community who do not have a VAT number, VAT will be added at the local rate. Payments to the IUCr are handled by WorldPay, who will accept payment by credit card in several currencies. To purchase the article, please complete the form below (fields marked * are required), and then click on `Continue'.
E-mail address* 
Repeat e-mail address* 
(for error checking) 

Format*   PDF (US $40)
In order for VAT to be shown for your country javascript needs to be enabled.

VAT number 
(non-UK EC countries only) 
Country* 
 

Terms and conditions of use
Contact us

Follow J. Appl. Cryst.
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow J. Appl. Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds