Download citation
Download citation
link to html
A generalized approach is proposed for the structure description of the homologous series Ga4Tim-4O2m-2 with crystallographic shear (CS) structures based on that of rutile. A (3 + 1)-dimensional model for an ideal CS structure is built up in connection with the CS operation in three-dimensional space. Its structural parameters are determined by m, the shear plane and the shear vector. The Rietveld fitting of the X-ray diffraction profile of Ga4Ti13O32 (m = 17) was successfully carried out using the ideal CS structure as an initial model, where modulation functions of atomic positions are inherently discontinuous and sawtooth-like. The deviation of a real structure from the ideal one was described by a few additional Fourier terms. This method was confirmed to be efficient for reducing the number of structural parameters required in the refinement in comparison to the conventional three-dimensional description.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S010876810602369X/ck5017sup1.cif
Contains datablocks global, I

rtv

Rietveld powder data file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S010876810602369X/ck5017sup2.rtv
Contains datablock I

Computing details top

Program(s) used to refine structure: (Jana2000; Petricek and Dusek, 2000); software used to prepare material for publication: (Jana2000; Petricek and Dusek, 2000).

Figures top
[Figure 1]
[Figure 2]
[Figure 3]
[Figure 4]
[Figure 5]
(I) top
Crystal data top
Ga0.444O3.556Ti1.444V = 57.64 Å3
Mr = 157Z = 1
Monoclinic, P2/m(α1/2γ)00†F(000) = 74
q = 0.11111a* + -0.05556c*Dx = 4.52 Mg m3
a = 4.0904 ÅSynchrotron radiation, λ = 0.8 Å
b = 2.9755 ÅT = 295 K
c = 4.7359 Å?, ? × ? × ? mm
β = 90.2935°
† Symmetry operations: (1) x1, x2, x3, x4; (2) −x1, x2, −x3, −x4; (3) −x1, −x2, −x3, −x4; (4) x1, −x2, x3, x4; (5) x1, 1/2+x2, x3, 1/2+x4; (6) −x1, 1/2+x2, −x3, 1/2−x4; (7) −x1, 1/2−x2, −x3, 1/2−x4; (8) x1, 1/2−x2, x3, 1/2+x4.

Data collection top
2θmin = 4.004°, 2θmax = 79.994°, 2θstep =
Refinement top
Rp = 0.065Profile function: Pseudo-Voigt
Rwp = 0.09478 parameters
Rexp = 0.023Weighting scheme based on measured s.u.'s
R(F) = 0.041(Δ/σ)max = 9.498
χ2 = NOT FOUNDBackground function: 20 Legendre polynoms
18999 data pointsPreferred orientation correction: March & Dollase
Crystal data top
Ga0.444O3.556Ti1.444β = 90.2935°
Mr = 157V = 57.64 Å3
Monoclinic, P2/m(α1/2γ)00†Z = 1
q = 0.11111a* + -0.05556c*Synchrotron radiation, λ = 0.8 Å
a = 4.0904 ÅT = 295 K
b = 2.9755 Å?, ? × ? × ? mm
c = 4.7359 Å
† Symmetry operations: (1) x1, x2, x3, x4; (2) −x1, x2, −x3, −x4; (3) −x1, −x2, −x3, −x4; (4) x1, −x2, x3, x4; (5) x1, 1/2+x2, x3, 1/2+x4; (6) −x1, 1/2+x2, −x3, 1/2−x4; (7) −x1, 1/2−x2, −x3, 1/2−x4; (8) x1, 1/2−x2, x3, 1/2+x4.

Data collection top
2θmin = 4.004°, 2θmax = 79.994°, 2θstep =
Refinement top
Rp = 0.065χ2 = NOT FOUND
Rwp = 0.09418999 data points
Rexp = 0.02378 parameters
R(F) = 0.041(Δ/σ)max = 9.498
Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/UeqOcc. (<1)
M1a0000.0093 (4)*0.965 (5)
M1'0.1363 (5)00.1050 (4)0.0118 (6)*
M2a0.50.50.50.0095 (4)*0.919 (6)
M2'a0.6738 (6)0.50.5838 (5)0.0045 (7)*0.63 (2)
O10.301 (7)00.311 (5)0.0041 (6)*
O1'0.055 (2)00.267 (2)0.002 (2)*
O1"0.456 (3)00.390 (2)0.013 (3)*
O20.219 (7)0.50.178 (5)0.0080 (7)*
O2'0.003 (3)0.50.291 (2)0.009 (3)*
O2"0.415 (3)0.50.076 (2)0.019 (3)*
Bond lengths (Å) top
AverageMinimumMaximum
M1a—O11.96 (4)1.95 (3)1.98 (3)
M1a—O1i1.96 (4)1.95 (3)1.98 (3)
M1a—O1"1.89 (2)1.89 (2)1.89 (2)
M1a—O1"i1.89 (2)1.89 (2)1.89 (2)
M1a—O2ii1.95 (2)1.92 (2)1.96 (2)
M1a—O21.95 (2)1.92 (2)1.96 (2)
M1a—O2i1.95 (2)1.92 (2)1.96 (2)
M1a—O2iii1.95 (2)1.92 (2)1.96 (2)
M1a—O2"ii1.963 (13)1.963 (13)1.963 (13)
M1a—O2"1.963 (13)1.963 (13)1.963 (13)
M1a—O2"i1.963 (13)1.963 (13)1.963 (13)
M1a—O2"iii1.963 (13)1.963 (13)1.963 (13)
M2a—O11.96 (3)1.94 (3)1.97 (2)
M2a—O1iv1.96 (3)1.94 (3)1.97 (2)
M2a—O1v1.96 (3)1.94 (3)1.97 (2)
M2a—O1vi1.96 (3)1.94 (3)1.97 (2)
M2a—O2vii1.98 (4)1.92 (4)2.02 (4)
M2a—O2viii1.98 (4)1.92 (4)2.02 (4)
M2a—O2'vii2.02 (3)2.02 (3)2.02 (3)
M2a—O2'viii2.02 (3)2.02 (3)2.02 (3)
M2'a—O1'ix2.170 (10)2.170 (10)2.170 (10)
M2'a—O1'v1.985 (7)1.985 (7)1.985 (7)
M2'a—O1'vi1.985 (7)1.985 (7)1.985 (7)
M2'a—O1"1.961 (7)1.961 (7)1.961 (7)
M2'a—O1"iv1.961 (7)1.961 (7)1.961 (7)
M2'a—O2vii1.93 (3)1.93 (3)1.93 (3)
Symmetry codes: (i) x1, x2, x3, x4; (ii) x1, x21, x3, x4; (iii) x1, x2+1, x3, x4; (iv) x1, x2+1, x3, x4; (v) x1+1, x2, x3+1, x4; (vi) x1+1, x2+1, x3+1, x4; (vii) x1, x2, x3+1, x4; (viii) x1+1, x2+1, x3, x4; (ix) x1+1, x2+1/2, x3, x1/2.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaGa0.444O3.556Ti1.444
Mr157
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P2/m(α1/2γ)00†
Temperature (K)295
Wave vectorsq = 0.11111a* + -0.05556c*
a, b, c (Å)4.0904, 2.9755, 4.7359
β (°) 90.2935
V3)57.64
Z1
Radiation typeSynchrotron, λ = 0.8 Å
Specimen shape, size (mm)?, ? × ? × ?
Data collection
Diffractometer?
Specimen mounting?
Data collection mode?
Scan method?
2θ values (°)2θmin = 4.004 2θmax = 79.994 2θstep = 1
Refinement
R factors and goodness of fitRp = 0.065, Rwp = 0.094, Rexp = 0.023, R(F) = 0.041, χ2 = NOT FOUND
No. of data points18999
No. of parameters78
No. of restraints?
(Δ/σ)max9.498

† Symmetry operations: (1) x1, x2, x3, x4; (2) −x1, x2, −x3, −x4; (3) −x1, −x2, −x3, −x4; (4) x1, −x2, x3, x4; (5) x1, 1/2+x2, x3, 1/2+x4; (6) −x1, 1/2+x2, −x3, 1/2−x4; (7) −x1, 1/2−x2, −x3, 1/2−x4; (8) x1, 1/2−x2, x3, 1/2+x4.

Computer programs: (Jana2000; Petricek and Dusek, 2000).

 

Follow Acta Cryst. B
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds