Download citation
Download citation
link to html
The title mol­ecule, C15H18N2S2, adopts the Z configuration. The dihedral angle between the planes of the phenyl ring and the CH—NH—C=C(C[triple bond]N)—C(=S)—S fragment is 76.10 (5) Å. The mol­ecular structure is stabilized by a weak intra­molecular N—H...S hydrogen bond [H...S = 2.29 (3) Å, N...S = 2.981 (2) Å and N—H...S = 145 (2)°].

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807020429/ci2354sup1.cif
Contains datablocks I, global

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807020429/ci2354Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

CCDC reference: 647714

Key indicators

  • Single-crystal X-ray study
  • T = 298 K
  • Mean [sigma](C-C) = 0.003 Å
  • R factor = 0.043
  • wR factor = 0.122
  • Data-to-parameter ratio = 17.1

checkCIF/PLATON results

No syntax errors found



Alert level C PLAT153_ALERT_1_C The su's on the Cell Axes are Equal (x 100000) . 300 Ang. PLAT371_ALERT_2_C Long C(sp2)-C(sp1) Bond C2 - C5 ... 1.44 Ang.
0 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem 0 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem 2 ALERT level C = Check and explain 0 ALERT level G = General alerts; check 1 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 1 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 0 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 0 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion 0 ALERT type 5 Informative message, check
checkCIF publication errors
Alert level A PUBL024_ALERT_1_A The number of authors is greater than 5. Please specify the role of each of the co-authors for your paper.
Author Response: - Ms Toumi is researcher who does with work. Prof. K. Boujlel and Prof. M. Bordeau are resectively the director and codirector of thesis from the Unversity of Tunis El-Manar and the Unversity of Bordeaux I. Dr. Raouafi is the direct supervisor of Ms Toumi. Prof. Driss and Ms Ben Amor are the crystallographist who solve the strucutre.

1 ALERT level A = Data missing that is essential or data in wrong format 0 ALERT level G = General alerts. Data that may be required is missing

Comment top

Dithiocarboxylic acid and its derivatives are good complexing agents for transition metal elements (Contreras et al., 2004; Jansons, 1976). They exhibit antitumoral actvities (Hou et al., 2006), and are useful in isotope labelling methods with radioactive nuclei (Belhadj-Tahar et al., 1996). More recently, these compounds gained attention in polymer chemistry for their ability to control radical polymerization, especially the RAFT radical polymerization (Laus et al., 2001).

The electolysis of acetonitrile under galvanostatic conditions in the presence of tetrabutylammonium perchlorate as a supporting electrolyte gives the cyanomethyl anion, a strong base, enough to deprotonate primary, secondary amines and amino alcohols to give the corresponding anions, useful intermediates for mild synthesis of alkyl carbamates, and oxazolinones by reaction with carbon dioxide (Feroci et al., 2000; 2003).

Under these conditions, the electrolysis of 1-phenylethylamine followed by the addition of carbon disulfide and ethyliodide yields the title compound, (I). The product formation is a result of autocondensation of acetonitrile followed by removal of ammonia by nucleophilic substitution with 1-phenylethlyamine, finally reaction with CS2 and EtI gives the compound (I). The structure of the N-unsbustituted compound (II) and its carboxylic analogue (III) have been reported (Szulzewsky et al., 1984). Compound (II) was obtained as a by-product during the course of reaction.

The structure determination of (I) was undertaken as a part of our studies on the generation and use of electrogenerated base (EGB) in organic synthesis and their applications in order to access to dithiocarbamates, dithiocarboxylic, trithiocarbonate esters (Toumi et al., 2007).

The molecular structure and labelling scheme are illustrated in Fig. 1. Atoms N1, N2, S1, S2, C1, C2, C3, C5 and C6 are coplanar, with an r.m.s deviation of 0.032 Å. The dihedral angle between the C8—C13 phenyl ring and the N1/N2/S1/S2/C1/C2/C3/C5/C6 plane is 76.10 (5) Å. The molecule adopts the Z configuration. The molecular structure is stabilized by an N2–H2···S1 intramolecular hydrogen bond [H2···S2 2.29 (3) Å, N2···S1 2.981 (2) Å and N2—H2···S1 145 (2)°].

Related literature top

For related literature, see: Belhadj-Tahar et al. (1996); Contreras et al. (2004); Feroci et al. (2000); Feroci et al. (2003); Hou et al. (2006); Jansons (1976); Laus et al. (2001); Szulzewsky et al. (1984); Toumi et al. (2007).

Experimental top

The title compound was obtained from the electrolysis of racemic 1-phenylethylamine (0.5 g, 4.1 mmol) under glavanostatic conditions (I = 80 mA, 6.0 h, Q = 2.0 F/mole) in anhydrous acetonitrile (80 ml) as solvent and reagent in the presence of tetrabutylammonium perchlorate (3.2 g, 8.0 mmol) as supporting electrolyte. At the end of electrolysis, carbon disulfide (0.38 g, 5.0 mmol) was added with stirring for 1 h and then ethyl iodide (0.78 g, 5.0 mmol) was added and the mixture was stirred overnight. After the removal of acetonitrile under reduced pressure, the residue was quenched with water and extracted with diethyl ether. The resulting product was chromatographed on silica gel (mesh 60, ethyl acetate/hexanes 30/70) to afford a pure product (yield: 73%, m.p. 354 K). Crystals suitable for X-ray analysis were grown by slow evaporation of a chloroform solution. The title compound was characterized by 1H, 13C NMR and MS spectra anlysis. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): 1.30 (t, 3J = 7 Hz, 3H); 1.60 (d, 3J = 6 Hz, 3H); 2.36 (s, 3H); 3.20 (q, 3J = 7 Hz, 2H); 5.2 (quint, 3J = 6 Hz, 1H);7.20–7.50 (m, 5H, Har); 14.1 (br, d, 3J = 6 Hz, 1H, intramolecularly bonded NH).13C NMR (CDCl3 + DMSO, 75 MHz): 12.9; 19.2; 23.3; 27.6; 54.6; 93.5; 118.1; 125.9; 127.8; 128.9; 141.3; 167.5; 206.6. MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z (%): 290 (10) (M+); 261 (6) (M - Et)+; 229 (18) (M - SEt)+; 196 (4); 185 (14) (M - CS2Et)+; 125 (13); 105 (100) (PhCHCH3)+; 77 (18) (Ph)+; 42 (4). CI-HRMS (CH4): 291.099 (M+H)+. IR (NaCl): ν = 3150 (m, broad, intramolecularly bonded NH), 2195 (conjugated CN), 1600 (S, conjugated C=C, Car—Car), 1261 (S, conjugated C—N), 1240 (C—N), 1090 (C=S).

Refinement top

The N-bound H atom was located in a difference Fourier map and refined freely. C-bound H atoms were placed in calculated positions and constrained to ride on their carrier atoms, with C—H = 0.95–0.98 Å; the isotropic displacement parameters of the H atoms were refined freely.

Structure description top

Dithiocarboxylic acid and its derivatives are good complexing agents for transition metal elements (Contreras et al., 2004; Jansons, 1976). They exhibit antitumoral actvities (Hou et al., 2006), and are useful in isotope labelling methods with radioactive nuclei (Belhadj-Tahar et al., 1996). More recently, these compounds gained attention in polymer chemistry for their ability to control radical polymerization, especially the RAFT radical polymerization (Laus et al., 2001).

The electolysis of acetonitrile under galvanostatic conditions in the presence of tetrabutylammonium perchlorate as a supporting electrolyte gives the cyanomethyl anion, a strong base, enough to deprotonate primary, secondary amines and amino alcohols to give the corresponding anions, useful intermediates for mild synthesis of alkyl carbamates, and oxazolinones by reaction with carbon dioxide (Feroci et al., 2000; 2003).

Under these conditions, the electrolysis of 1-phenylethylamine followed by the addition of carbon disulfide and ethyliodide yields the title compound, (I). The product formation is a result of autocondensation of acetonitrile followed by removal of ammonia by nucleophilic substitution with 1-phenylethlyamine, finally reaction with CS2 and EtI gives the compound (I). The structure of the N-unsbustituted compound (II) and its carboxylic analogue (III) have been reported (Szulzewsky et al., 1984). Compound (II) was obtained as a by-product during the course of reaction.

The structure determination of (I) was undertaken as a part of our studies on the generation and use of electrogenerated base (EGB) in organic synthesis and their applications in order to access to dithiocarbamates, dithiocarboxylic, trithiocarbonate esters (Toumi et al., 2007).

The molecular structure and labelling scheme are illustrated in Fig. 1. Atoms N1, N2, S1, S2, C1, C2, C3, C5 and C6 are coplanar, with an r.m.s deviation of 0.032 Å. The dihedral angle between the C8—C13 phenyl ring and the N1/N2/S1/S2/C1/C2/C3/C5/C6 plane is 76.10 (5) Å. The molecule adopts the Z configuration. The molecular structure is stabilized by an N2–H2···S1 intramolecular hydrogen bond [H2···S2 2.29 (3) Å, N2···S1 2.981 (2) Å and N2—H2···S1 145 (2)°].

For related literature, see: Belhadj-Tahar et al. (1996); Contreras et al. (2004); Feroci et al. (2000); Feroci et al. (2003); Hou et al. (2006); Jansons (1976); Laus et al. (2001); Szulzewsky et al. (1984); Toumi et al. (2007).

Computing details top

Data collection: CAD-4 EXPRESS (Duisenberg, 1992; Macíček & Yordanov, 1992); cell refinement: CAD-4 EXPRESS; data reduction: MolEN (Fair, 1990); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 1998); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The molecular structure of (I), showing the atom-numbering scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. Compounds (I)–(III).
(Z)-Ethyl 2-cyano-3-(1-phenylethylamino)but-2-enedithioate top
Crystal data top
C15H18N2S2F(000) = 616
Mr = 290.43Dx = 1.243 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 25 reflections
a = 8.997 (3) Åθ = 11.8–14.5°
b = 10.645 (3) ŵ = 0.33 mm1
c = 16.293 (3) ÅT = 298 K
β = 95.97 (2)°Prism, yellow
V = 1552.0 (7) Å30.50 × 0.50 × 0.50 mm
Z = 4
Data collection top
Enraf–Nonius CAD-4
diffractometer
2592 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tubeRint = 0.014
Graphite monochromatorθmax = 27.0°, θmin = 2.3°
ω/2θ scansh = 111
Absorption correction: ψ scan
(North et al., 1968)
k = 113
Tmin = 0.816, Tmax = 0.847l = 2020
4376 measured reflections2 standard reflections every 120 min
3386 independent reflections intensity decay: 4%
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.043Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.122H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.02 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0545P)2 + 0.7692P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
3386 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
198 parametersΔρmax = 0.71 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.47 e Å3
Crystal data top
C15H18N2S2V = 1552.0 (7) Å3
Mr = 290.43Z = 4
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation
a = 8.997 (3) ŵ = 0.33 mm1
b = 10.645 (3) ÅT = 298 K
c = 16.293 (3) Å0.50 × 0.50 × 0.50 mm
β = 95.97 (2)°
Data collection top
Enraf–Nonius CAD-4
diffractometer
2592 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Absorption correction: ψ scan
(North et al., 1968)
Rint = 0.014
Tmin = 0.816, Tmax = 0.8472 standard reflections every 120 min
4376 measured reflections intensity decay: 4%
3386 independent reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0430 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.122H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.02Δρmax = 0.71 e Å3
3386 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.47 e Å3
198 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
S10.15033 (7)0.11219 (5)0.04503 (4)0.0524 (2)
S20.22913 (9)0.36720 (5)0.01435 (4)0.0638 (2)
N10.4329 (3)0.3250 (2)0.1745 (1)0.0734 (6)
N20.2968 (2)0.0649 (2)0.0632 (1)0.0423 (4)
C10.2388 (2)0.2010 (2)0.0191 (1)0.0393 (4)
C20.3250 (2)0.1568 (2)0.0825 (1)0.0378 (4)
C30.3574 (2)0.0289 (2)0.1003 (1)0.0387 (4)
C40.4662 (3)0.0013 (2)0.1614 (1)0.0529 (5)
H140.55810.03550.13230.11 (1)*
H240.48940.07530.19090.09 (1)*
H340.42190.06350.20110.080 (9)*
C50.3862 (3)0.2501 (2)0.1332 (1)0.0483 (5)
C60.3188 (2)0.2004 (2)0.0763 (1)0.0445 (5)
H60.42780.21620.07850.059 (7)*
C70.2692 (3)0.2692 (2)0.0012 (1)0.0608 (7)
H170.32520.23680.04920.067 (7)*
H270.28870.35940.00620.09 (1)*
H370.16210.25560.00140.09 (1)*
C80.2339 (2)0.2475 (2)0.1568 (1)0.0407 (4)
C90.2656 (3)0.3681 (2)0.1843 (1)0.0502 (5)
H90.34020.41730.15380.067 (8)*
C100.1892 (3)0.4165 (2)0.2558 (2)0.0584 (6)
H100.21100.49890.27350.066 (7)*
C110.0822 (3)0.3459 (3)0.3009 (1)0.0610 (6)
H110.03150.37870.35040.084 (9)*
C120.0484 (3)0.2269 (3)0.2742 (1)0.0613 (6)
H120.02620.17820.30520.085 (9)*
C130.1233 (2)0.1782 (2)0.2020 (1)0.0498 (5)
H130.09840.09690.18360.053 (6)*
C140.1419 (3)0.4006 (2)0.0788 (2)0.0622 (6)
H1140.09150.48330.07290.09 (1)*
H2140.06450.33630.08550.073 (8)*
C150.2510 (4)0.4020 (4)0.1541 (2)0.087 (1)
H150.29270.31760.16380.10 (1)*
H250.20020.42810.20170.12 (1)*
H350.33170.46120.14630.12 (1)*
H20.241 (3)0.047 (2)0.030 (2)0.060 (8)*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
S10.0661 (4)0.0413 (3)0.0534 (3)0.0013 (3)0.0239 (3)0.0014 (2)
S20.1007 (5)0.0330 (3)0.0607 (4)0.0001 (3)0.0222 (3)0.0020 (2)
N10.095 (2)0.056 (1)0.074 (1)0.008 (1)0.030 (1)0.016 (1)
N20.048 (1)0.0332 (9)0.047 (1)0.0002 (7)0.0095 (8)0.0036 (7)
C10.046 (1)0.0322 (9)0.038 (1)0.0009 (8)0.0010 (8)0.0012 (8)
C20.041 (1)0.0347 (9)0.0369 (9)0.0035 (8)0.0023 (8)0.0010 (8)
C30.038 (1)0.041 (1)0.0362 (9)0.0017 (8)0.0003 (8)0.0007 (8)
C40.051 (1)0.054 (1)0.055 (1)0.003 (1)0.016 (1)0.003 (1)
C50.056 (1)0.042 (1)0.047 (1)0.001 (1)0.008 (1)0.0033 (9)
C60.047 (1)0.032 (1)0.053 (1)0.0032 (8)0.0013 (9)0.0027 (9)
C70.086 (2)0.042 (1)0.051 (1)0.004 (1)0.009 (1)0.005 (1)
C80.042 (1)0.035 (1)0.046 (1)0.0002 (8)0.0080 (8)0.0019 (8)
C90.048 (1)0.041 (1)0.062 (1)0.004 (1)0.009 (1)0.007 (1)
C100.063 (1)0.049 (1)0.066 (1)0.006 (1)0.018 (1)0.021 (1)
C110.064 (1)0.069 (2)0.050 (1)0.013 (1)0.008 (1)0.015 (1)
C120.060 (1)0.065 (2)0.056 (1)0.003 (1)0.006 (1)0.001 (1)
C130.054 (1)0.042 (1)0.053 (1)0.005 (1)0.002 (1)0.003 (1)
C140.069 (2)0.048 (1)0.070 (2)0.001 (1)0.013 (1)0.015 (1)
C150.090 (2)0.102 (3)0.071 (2)0.012 (2)0.008 (2)0.026 (2)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
S1—C11.671 (2)C7—H370.98
S2—C11.773 (2)C8—C131.388 (3)
S2—C141.815 (3)C8—C91.398 (3)
N1—C51.151 (3)C9—C101.388 (3)
N2—C31.315 (3)C9—H90.95
N2—C61.474 (3)C10—C111.373 (4)
N2—H20.80 (3)C10—H100.95
C1—C21.434 (3)C11—C121.384 (4)
C2—C31.428 (3)C11—H110.95
C2—C51.437 (3)C12—C131.394 (3)
C3—C41.502 (3)C12—H120.95
C4—H140.98C13—H130.95
C4—H240.98C14—C151.489 (4)
C4—H340.98C14—H1140.99
C6—C71.531 (3)C14—H2140.99
C6—C81.532 (3)C15—H150.98
C6—H61.00C15—H250.98
C7—H170.98C15—H350.98
C7—H270.98
C1—S2—C14105.0 (1)H27—C7—H37109.5
C3—N2—C6127.5 (2)C13—C8—C9118.5 (2)
C3—N2—H2117 (2)C13—C8—C6123.11 (18)
C6—N2—H2115 (2)C9—C8—C6118.38 (19)
C2—C1—S1126.4 (1)C10—C9—C8120.7 (2)
C2—C1—S2113.0 (1)C10—C9—H9119.6
S1—C1—S2120.6 (1)C8—C9—H9119.6
C3—C2—C1126.61 (17)C11—C10—C9120.3 (2)
C3—C2—C5116.29 (18)C11—C10—H10119.9
C1—C2—C5117.10 (18)C9—C10—H10119.9
N2—C3—C2121.83 (18)C10—C11—C12119.8 (2)
N2—C3—C4118.16 (19)C10—C11—H11120.1
C2—C3—C4119.99 (18)C12—C11—H11120.1
C3—C4—H14109.5C11—C12—C13120.2 (2)
C3—C4—H24109.5C11—C12—H12119.9
H14—C4—H24109.5C13—C12—H12119.9
C3—C4—H34109.5C8—C13—C12120.5 (2)
H14—C4—H34109.5C8—C13—H13119.8
H24—C4—H34109.5C12—C13—H13119.8
N1—C5—C2178.9 (3)C15—C14—S2112.7 (2)
N2—C6—C7107.36 (18)C15—C14—H114109.1
N2—C6—C8112.45 (17)S2—C14—H114109.1
C7—C6—C8111.51 (18)C15—C14—H214109.1
N2—C6—H6108.5S2—C14—H214109.1
C7—C6—H6108.5H114—C14—H214107.8
C8—C6—H6108.5C14—C15—H15109.5
C6—C7—H17109.5C14—C15—H25109.5
C6—C7—H27109.5H15—C15—H25109.5
H17—C7—H27109.5C14—C15—H35109.5
C6—C7—H37109.5H15—C15—H35109.5
H17—C7—H37109.5H25—C15—H35109.5

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC15H18N2S2
Mr290.43
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/c
Temperature (K)298
a, b, c (Å)8.997 (3), 10.645 (3), 16.293 (3)
β (°) 95.97 (2)
V3)1552.0 (7)
Z4
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)0.33
Crystal size (mm)0.50 × 0.50 × 0.50
Data collection
DiffractometerEnraf–Nonius CAD-4
Absorption correctionψ scan
(North et al., 1968)
Tmin, Tmax0.816, 0.847
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
4376, 3386, 2592
Rint0.014
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.638
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.043, 0.122, 1.02
No. of reflections3386
No. of parameters198
H-atom treatmentH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.71, 0.47

Computer programs: CAD-4 EXPRESS (Duisenberg, 1992; Macíček & Yordanov, 1992), CAD-4 EXPRESS, MolEN (Fair, 1990), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 1998), SHELXL97.

 

Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds