Download citation
Download citation
link to html
The title compound, C4H12B2Br4N2, contains an almost square four-membered ring that results from the head-to-tail dimerization of the dimethyl­amino­dibromo­borane. The dimer has almost mmm symmetry and does have 2/m crystallographic symmetry. The crystal structure involves C—H...Br hydrogen bonds.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807052385/br2057sup1.cif
Contains datablocks I, global

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807052385/br2057Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

CCDC reference: 667472

Key indicators

  • Single-crystal X-ray study
  • T = 173 K
  • Mean [sigma](N-B) = 0.005 Å
  • R factor = 0.032
  • wR factor = 0.085
  • Data-to-parameter ratio = 22.6

checkCIF/PLATON results

No syntax errors found



Alert level B ABSTM02_ALERT_3_B The ratio of expected to reported Tmax/Tmin(RR') is < 0.75 Tmin and Tmax reported: 0.210 0.662 Tmin(prime) and Tmax expected: 0.318 0.662 RR(prime) = 0.660 Please check that your absorption correction is appropriate.
Author Response: The faces of the crystal were not clearly defined to allow indexation.
PLAT061_ALERT_3_B Tmax/Tmin Range Test RR' too Large .............       0.61

Alert level C PLAT480_ALERT_4_C Long H...A H-Bond Reported H1A .. BR1 .. 3.02 Ang. PLAT764_ALERT_4_C Overcomplete CIF Bond List Detected (Rep/Expd) . 1.17 Ratio
0 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem 2 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem 2 ALERT level C = Check and explain 0 ALERT level G = General alerts; check 0 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 0 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 2 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 2 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion 0 ALERT type 5 Informative message, check

Comment top

The structure of the title compound is shown in Fig. 1. Head-to-tail dimerization of dimethylaminodibromoborane results in a NBNB four-membered ring only slightly deviating from square geometry. The shortest intermolecular contact between hydrogen and bromine from adjacent molecules is of 3.022 Å.

Related literature top

For related structures featuring an aminodibromoborane skeleton, see: Abu Ali et al. (2001); Klebe et al. (1984); Nie et al. (2005); Nöth et al. (1983). Aminohalogenoboranes are direct precursors for diboranes, see: Ishimaya et al. (2002).

Experimental top

The title compound was prepared by substituent redistribution from tris(dimethylamino)borane and tribromoborane. Suitable crystals were obtained upon allowing the crude reaction mixture to stand at 293 K.

Refinement top

All H atoms attached to C atoms were fixed geometrically and treated as riding with C—H = 0.97 Å and with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C).

Structure description top

The structure of the title compound is shown in Fig. 1. Head-to-tail dimerization of dimethylaminodibromoborane results in a NBNB four-membered ring only slightly deviating from square geometry. The shortest intermolecular contact between hydrogen and bromine from adjacent molecules is of 3.022 Å.

For related structures featuring an aminodibromoborane skeleton, see: Abu Ali et al. (2001); Klebe et al. (1984); Nie et al. (2005); Nöth et al. (1983). Aminohalogenoboranes are direct precursors for diboranes, see: Ishimaya et al. (2002).

Computing details top

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2006); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2006); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2006); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Bruker, 2006); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Bruker, 2006).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The molecular structure of dimethylaminodibromoborane dimer, with the atom-labeling scheme. The B and Br atoms lie in the crystallographic mirror plane and the N atoms lie on the twofold axis. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level. H atoms omitted for clarity. Symmetry codes: (i) -x + 2, y, -z + 1; (ii) -x + 2, -y, -z + 1; (iii) x, -y, z.
2,2,4,4-Tetrabromo-1,1,3,3-tetramethylcyclodiborazane top
Crystal data top
C4H12B2Br4N2F(000) = 400
Mr = 429.42Dx = 2.445 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/mMelting point: 340 K
Hall symbol: -C 2yMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 11.1089 (13) ÅCell parameters from 1609 reflections
b = 8.7842 (10) Åθ = 3.1–28.2°
c = 6.9077 (8) ŵ = 13.75 mm1
β = 120.074 (2)°T = 173 K
V = 583.33 (12) Å3Plate, colourless
Z = 20.08 × 0.08 × 0.03 mm
Data collection top
Bruker APEXII CCD area-detector
diffractometer
769 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube683 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.048
φ and ω scansθmax = 28.2°, θmin = 3.1°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2006)
h = 1414
Tmin = 0.210, Tmax = 0.662k = 1011
2689 measured reflectionsl = 99
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.032Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.085H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.04 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0389P)2 + 1.911P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
769 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
34 parametersΔρmax = 0.74 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 1.42 e Å3
Crystal data top
C4H12B2Br4N2V = 583.33 (12) Å3
Mr = 429.42Z = 2
Monoclinic, C2/mMo Kα radiation
a = 11.1089 (13) ŵ = 13.75 mm1
b = 8.7842 (10) ÅT = 173 K
c = 6.9077 (8) Å0.08 × 0.08 × 0.03 mm
β = 120.074 (2)°
Data collection top
Bruker APEXII CCD area-detector
diffractometer
769 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2006)
683 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.210, Tmax = 0.662Rint = 0.048
2689 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0320 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.085H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.04Δρmax = 0.74 e Å3
769 reflectionsΔρmin = 1.42 e Å3
34 parameters
Special details top

Experimental. The crystal was made of many different layers so it was twinned. To solve this problem, we had to cut a very small plate (we couldn't even see it with the camera). This is why we measured a crystal that we were unable to index correctly for the absorption correction.

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Br11.17185 (5)0.00000.31107 (9)0.03261 (19)
Br21.28193 (6)0.00000.83699 (9)0.0429 (2)
N11.00000.1319 (4)0.50000.0230 (8)
B11.1096 (5)0.00000.5364 (8)0.0205 (9)
C11.0398 (4)0.2347 (5)0.6963 (9)0.0449 (10)
H1A1.11990.29690.72270.067*
H1C1.06440.17310.82930.067*
H1B0.96130.30120.66510.067*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Br10.0359 (3)0.0390 (3)0.0348 (3)0.0000.0266 (2)0.000
Br20.0411 (3)0.0391 (4)0.0231 (3)0.0000.0028 (2)0.000
N10.0233 (18)0.0197 (18)0.0300 (19)0.0000.0164 (16)0.000
B10.018 (2)0.023 (2)0.022 (2)0.0000.0107 (18)0.000
C10.042 (2)0.037 (2)0.069 (3)0.0175 (17)0.037 (2)0.032 (2)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Br1—B11.995 (5)N1—B11.606 (4)
Br2—B11.998 (5)B1—N1ii1.606 (4)
N1—C11.499 (4)C1—H1A0.9800
N1—C1i1.499 (4)C1—H1C0.9800
N1—B1ii1.606 (4)C1—H1B0.9800
C1—N1—C1i106.0 (5)N1ii—B1—Br2114.8 (2)
C1—N1—B1ii115.7 (2)N1—B1—Br2114.8 (2)
C1i—N1—B1ii115.8 (3)Br1—B1—Br2106.5 (2)
C1—N1—B1115.8 (3)N1—C1—H1A109.5
C1i—N1—B1115.7 (2)N1—C1—H1C109.5
B1ii—N1—B187.7 (3)H1A—C1—H1C109.5
N1ii—B1—N192.3 (3)N1—C1—H1B109.5
N1ii—B1—Br1114.2 (2)H1A—C1—H1B109.5
N1—B1—Br1114.2 (2)H1C—C1—H1B109.5
Symmetry codes: (i) x+2, y, z+1; (ii) x+2, y, z+1.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C1—H1A···Br1iii0.983.023.982 (4)167
Symmetry code: (iii) x+5/2, y+1/2, z+1.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC4H12B2Br4N2
Mr429.42
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, C2/m
Temperature (K)173
a, b, c (Å)11.1089 (13), 8.7842 (10), 6.9077 (8)
β (°) 120.074 (2)
V3)583.33 (12)
Z2
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)13.75
Crystal size (mm)0.08 × 0.08 × 0.03
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker APEXII CCD area-detector
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2006)
Tmin, Tmax0.210, 0.662
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
2689, 769, 683
Rint0.048
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.664
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.032, 0.085, 1.04
No. of reflections769
No. of parameters34
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.74, 1.42

Computer programs: SMART (Bruker, 2006), SAINT (Bruker, 2006), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), SHELXTL (Bruker, 2006).

Selected geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Br1—B11.995 (5)N1—C11.499 (4)
Br2—B11.998 (5)N1—B11.606 (4)
C1—N1—C1i106.0 (5)B1ii—N1—B187.7 (3)
C1—N1—B1ii115.7 (2)N1ii—B1—Br1114.2 (2)
Symmetry codes: (i) x+2, y, z+1; (ii) x+2, y, z+1.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C1—H1A···Br1iii0.983.023.982 (4)166.8
Symmetry code: (iii) x+5/2, y+1/2, z+1.
 

Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds