Download citation
Download citation
link to html
The title compound, C13H6O4S5, possesses crystallographically imposed mirror symmetry, with the atoms of the C=S group lying on the mirror plane. It is an example of the general formula [RCO]2(dmit), where R is a furan ring and dmit is 2-thioxo-1,3-dithiole-4,5-dithiol­ate. The components exhibit some polarization of their mol­ecular–electronic structure. The dmit and furan moieties exhibit a high degree of conjugation, as the introduction of C=O connecting the conjugated furan (donor) and dmit (acceptor) rings forms a good conjugated system with high delocalization. A polar three-dimensional framework is built from a combination of inter­molecular contacts, namely S...S inter­actions and C—H...O hydrogen bonding. The structural characteristics lead to good second-order non-linear optical properties.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270105026053/bm1613sup1.cif
Contains datablocks I, global

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270105026053/bm1613Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

CCDC reference: 288625

Comment top

During the past two decades, organic nonlinear optical (NLO) materials have been the subject of extensive theoretical and experimental investigations, due to their potentially high nonlinearities and rapid electro-optic response compared with their inorganic counterparts (Gunter, 2000). Organic NLO materials play an important role in second-harmonic generation (SHG), frequency mixing, electro-optic modulation, optical parametric oscillation, optical bistability, etc. Many of these materials owe their NLO properties to the possession of delocalized π-electron systems linking donor and acceptor groups which enhance the asymmetric polarizability. Since the NLO effect is electronic in origin at optical frequencies, higher speeds and greater intrinsic nonlinearity are possible with conjugated organic molecules.

Since 1979 (Steimeck & Kirmse, 1979), 1,3-dithiole-2-thione-4,5-dithiolate (dmit) and related ligands have been intensely investigated because they can be used in the assembly of highly electrically conducting radical anion salts and charge-transfer complexes as special π-electron delocalization conjugated systems. They are generally used as important building blocks for organic, organometallic and coordination complexes which act as electrical conductors and superconductors (Svenstrup & Becher, 1995; Cassoux, 1999; Pullen & Olk, 1999; Robertson & Cronin, 2002), especially bis(ethylenedithio)tetrathiafulvalene and its derivatives (Ishiguro et al., 1998).

The π-electron delocalization in these conjugated systems can also contribute to their ultrafast response capability and large optical nonlinearity, just like other organics. Recently, many of these complexes have been reported as possessing good second- (Fang et al., 1994; Zhai et al., 1999) and third-order (Huggard & Blau, 1987; Winter et al., 1992; Zuo et al., 1996; Wang et al., 1999; Bai et al., 1999; Dai et al., 2000; Liu et al., 2002) NLO properties. The title compound, (I), has been prepared as a continuation of this line of research.

Compound (I) has a novel chemical structure with the general formula [RCO]2(dmit). To date, only three crystal structure determinations of compounds with this general formula have been reported. The first is 4,5-di(benzoylthio)-4,5-didehydro-1,3-dithiolane-2-thione, (II) (Solans et al., 1987), the second is 4,5-bis(pivaloylsulfanyl)-1,3-dithiolane-2-thione, (III) (Wang et al., 2005), and the third is a redetermination of (II) at 120 K (Cox & Doidge-Harrison, 1996). Generally speaking, such compounds possess very small third-order NLO properties in the absence of a transition metal ion. Since the dmit moiety has a relatively high degree of conjugation, we can investigate crystals containing it for second-order NLO properties. Both (II) and (III) were found to crystallize in centrosymmetric space groups, which leads to a loss of macroscopic second-order NLO properties. However, we found that (I) crystallizes in a noncentrosymmetric space group, a necessary condition for a material to exhibit a second-order NLO effect.

The molecule of (I) has mirror symmetry (Cs), with atoms C1 and S1 situated on the mirror plane (Fig. 1a). The length of the CS double bond [1.643 (5) Å] lies between those in (II) [1.650 (5) Å; Solans et al., 1987] and (III) [1.627 (6) Å; Wang et al., 2005], and is much longer than the typical CS bond length (1.599 Å; Allen et al., 1987). The other C—S bonds (Table 1) span the range 1.725 (3)–1.751 (3) Å. All of them are shorter than the typical C—S single bond (1.819 Å; Allen et al., 1987) and are essentially single bonds with some double-bond character. The C2C2i bond length [1.362 (6) Å; symmetry code: (i) x, 1 − y, z] is larger than those of (II) (Solans et al., 1987) and (III) (Wang et al., 2005), but all of them are in the range from 1.33 (1) Å (an ethenetetrathiol; Broadhurst et al., 1982) to 1.46 (2) Å (a tetrathiooxalate; Lund et al., 1982). Therefore, the dmit moiety has a rather high degree of conjugation. The three bond lengths in the furan ring, C4—O2, C7—O2 and C5—C6, are very close to the corresponding typical single-bond lengths. However, since the introduction of CO, although one CC double bond in the furan ring [C4C5, 1.345 (6) Å] is normal, the other [C6C7, 1.318 (8) Å] appears shorter than the typical Csp2Csp2 bond length of 1.341 Å (Allen et al., 1987). Moreover, the bond angles in the five-membered rings of the dmit and furan moieties deviate somewhat from those of a regular pentagon (Table 1). The overall molecular conformation of (I) can be defined in terms of the torsion angles. The molecule is significantly non-planar, as shown in Fig. 1(b). The dihedral angle between the dmit ring (C1/S2/C2/C2i/S2i) and furan ring (O2/C4/C5/C6/C7) is 23.4 (3)°. Two torsion angles indicate this non-planarity: C2i—C2—S3—C3 and S2—C2—S3—C3, with values of 151.2 (4) and −38.3 (3)°, respectively.

The packing of the molecules in (I) is shown in Fig. 2. The structure of (I) consists of discrete molecules linked by intermolecular S···S interactions (Spek, 2003) and C—H···O hydrogen bonds. S···S interactions play the major part in controlling the supramolecular assembly of the molecules. The shortest contacts, i.e. the shortest intermolecular distances between non-H atoms, are S1···S3ii 3.5741 (18) Å and S1···S3iii 3.6599 (13) Å [symmetry codes: (ii) 1 + x, y, 1 + z; (iii) 1 + x, y,2 + z]. The O atom of the carbonyl group is involved in an intermolecular hydrogen bond with one CH group of the furan ring (Table 2). The result is a polar three-dimensional framework constructed via several kinds of intermolecular interactions.

Overall, both the dmit and furan moieties exhibit a high degree of conjugation. Additionally, the introduction of CO, which connects the conjugated furan (donor) and dmit (acceptor) rings, forms (I) into a conjugated system with high delocalization. These structural characteristics lead to good second-order NLO properties for (I). The SHG effect of the crystal of (I) was studied by the powder SHG method (Kurtz & Perry, 1968). It was found that the crystal of (I) is superior to crystalline urea in its SHG effect (Data for comparison?).

Experimental top

2-Furoyl chloride (10 ml) was added at room temperature to a solution of (n-Bu4N)2[Zn(dmit)2] (10 mmol, 9.43 g) in acetone (60 ml) and the mixture was stirred for about 1 h. The resulting yellow precipitate was filtered off, and the yellow filtrate was then left to stand for several hours at ca 273 K, after which transparent yellow plate single crystals of (I), suitable for X-ray structure determination, were obtained.

Refinement top

The absolute structure parameter (Flack, 1983) refined to a value of −0.11 (13) with 263 Friedel pairs. As this does not represent a very reliable determination, Friedel pairs were merged in the final cycles of refinement. All H atoms were placed in geometrically calculated positions and refined riding at a distance of 0.93 Å from their parent C atoms and with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C).

Computing details top

Data collection: XSCANS (Bruker, 1996); cell refinement: XSCANS; data reduction: SHELXTL (Bruker, 1997); program(s) used to solve structure: SIR97 (Altomare et al., 1999); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL (Bruker, 1997); molecular graphics: SHELXTL; software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL and PLATON (Spek, 2003).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. (a) The molecular structure of (I), showing 50% probability displacement ellipsoids and the atom-numbering scheme [symmetry code: (i) x, 1 − y, z]. (b) An orthogonal view showing the non-planarity of the molecule.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. The unit cell of (I), viewed along the c axis, showing the intermolecular S···S interactions and C—H···O hydrogen bonds.
4,5-Bis(furoylsulfanyl)-1,3-dithiolane-2-thione top
Crystal data top
C13H6O4S5F(000) = 392
Mr = 386.48Dx = 1.672 Mg m3
Monoclinic, CmMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71069 Å
Hall symbol: C -2yCell parameters from 40 reflections
a = 7.2228 (11) Åθ = 4.8–12.5°
b = 24.518 (3) ŵ = 0.77 mm1
c = 5.0330 (7) ÅT = 293 K
β = 120.521 (10)°Plate, yellow
V = 767.79 (19) Å30.39 × 0.32 × 0.12 mm
Z = 2
Data collection top
Bruker P4
diffractometer
1064 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tubeRint = 0.026
Graphite monochromatorθmax = 31.5°, θmin = 3.3°
ω scansh = 101
Absorption correction: ψ scan
(XSCANS; Bruker, 1996)
k = 361
Tmin = 0.73, Tmax = 0.88l = 67
1644 measured reflections3 standard reflections every 97 reflections
1316 independent reflections intensity decay: none
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
Least-squares matrix: fullH-atom parameters constrained
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.035 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0498P)2 + 0.0399P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
wR(F2) = 0.091(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
S = 1.02Δρmax = 0.39 e Å3
1316 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.33 e Å3
104 parametersExtinction correction: SHELXTL (Bruker, 1997), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
2 restraintsExtinction coefficient: 0.018 (3)
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsAbsolute structure: Flack (1983), with 263 Friedel pairs
Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier mapAbsolute structure parameter: 0.11 (13)
Crystal data top
C13H6O4S5V = 767.79 (19) Å3
Mr = 386.48Z = 2
Monoclinic, CmMo Kα radiation
a = 7.2228 (11) ŵ = 0.77 mm1
b = 24.518 (3) ÅT = 293 K
c = 5.0330 (7) Å0.39 × 0.32 × 0.12 mm
β = 120.521 (10)°
Data collection top
Bruker P4
diffractometer
1064 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Absorption correction: ψ scan
(XSCANS; Bruker, 1996)
Rint = 0.026
Tmin = 0.73, Tmax = 0.883 standard reflections every 97 reflections
1644 measured reflections intensity decay: none
1316 independent reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.035H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.091Δρmax = 0.39 e Å3
S = 1.02Δρmin = 0.33 e Å3
1316 reflectionsAbsolute structure: Flack (1983), with 263 Friedel pairs
104 parametersAbsolute structure parameter: 0.11 (13)
2 restraints
Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.6443 (7)0.50001.2185 (10)0.0333 (9)
C20.3613 (6)0.47223 (11)0.6582 (8)0.0328 (6)
C30.2959 (6)0.37392 (14)0.3505 (8)0.0404 (8)
C40.1674 (6)0.34290 (14)0.0708 (9)0.0423 (8)
C50.0142 (8)0.35422 (17)0.1958 (10)0.0537 (10)
H50.09250.38650.24470.064*
C60.0632 (9)0.3083 (2)0.3863 (12)0.0680 (13)
H60.17910.30400.58560.082*
C70.0889 (10)0.2724 (2)0.2242 (14)0.0745 (16)
H70.09540.23780.29500.089*
O10.4681 (5)0.36068 (11)0.5624 (8)0.0621 (9)
O20.2346 (5)0.29192 (12)0.0575 (8)0.0700 (10)
S10.8280 (2)0.50001.5868 (2)0.0413 (3)
S20.54374 (13)0.44117 (3)1.00423 (16)0.0395 (2)
S30.16122 (14)0.43617 (4)0.34191 (18)0.0444 (3)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.031 (2)0.036 (2)0.031 (2)0.0000.0146 (17)0.000
C20.0277 (13)0.0333 (14)0.0284 (12)0.0001 (14)0.0076 (10)0.0018 (13)
C30.0423 (18)0.0305 (15)0.0424 (18)0.0025 (14)0.0172 (15)0.0017 (13)
C40.048 (2)0.0277 (14)0.0456 (19)0.0000 (14)0.0195 (16)0.0033 (13)
C50.058 (2)0.0393 (19)0.050 (2)0.0024 (18)0.0180 (19)0.0083 (16)
C60.074 (3)0.061 (3)0.056 (3)0.020 (3)0.024 (2)0.024 (2)
C70.086 (4)0.048 (2)0.093 (4)0.014 (2)0.047 (3)0.034 (3)
O10.0512 (16)0.0410 (14)0.0595 (17)0.0130 (13)0.0028 (14)0.0042 (13)
O20.070 (2)0.0380 (14)0.078 (2)0.0118 (14)0.0206 (19)0.0141 (15)
S10.0409 (7)0.0477 (6)0.0255 (5)0.0000.0098 (5)0.000
S20.0387 (5)0.0333 (4)0.0314 (4)0.0005 (3)0.0068 (3)0.0024 (3)
S30.0340 (4)0.0383 (4)0.0402 (4)0.0049 (4)0.0037 (3)0.0107 (4)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
C1—S11.643 (5)C4—C51.345 (6)
C1—S21.725 (3)C4—O21.355 (5)
C2—C2i1.362 (6)C5—C61.403 (6)
C2—S21.737 (3)C5—H50.9300
C2—S31.751 (3)C6—C71.318 (8)
C3—O11.201 (5)C6—H60.9300
C3—C41.447 (5)C7—O21.354 (6)
C3—S31.799 (4)C7—H70.9300
S1—C1—S2123.22 (13)C4—C5—H5126.4
S2—C1—S2i113.5 (3)C6—C5—H5126.4
C2i—C2—S2115.99 (10)C7—C6—C5105.7 (4)
C2i—C2—S3120.31 (10)C7—C6—H6127.1
S2—C2—S3123.07 (17)C5—C6—H6127.1
O1—C3—C4125.8 (3)C6—C7—O2111.8 (4)
O1—C3—S3123.7 (3)C6—C7—H7124.1
C4—C3—S3110.5 (3)O2—C7—H7124.1
C5—C4—O2109.5 (3)C4—O2—C7105.7 (4)
C5—C4—C3132.9 (3)C1—S2—C297.15 (16)
O2—C4—C3117.6 (3)C2—S3—C3102.70 (17)
C4—C5—C6107.2 (4)
O1—C3—C4—C5172.1 (5)C6—C7—O2—C40.4 (6)
S3—C3—C4—C58.3 (6)S1—C1—S2—C2178.5 (3)
O1—C3—C4—O27.3 (7)S2i—C1—S2—C24.7 (3)
S3—C3—C4—O2172.2 (3)C2i—C2—S2—C12.9 (4)
O2—C4—C5—C60.2 (5)S3—C2—S2—C1168.1 (3)
C3—C4—C5—C6179.3 (5)C2i—C2—S3—C3151.2 (4)
C4—C5—C6—C70.4 (6)S2—C2—S3—C338.3 (3)
C5—C6—C7—O20.5 (7)O1—C3—S3—C211.1 (4)
C5—C4—O2—C70.1 (5)C4—C3—S3—C2169.4 (3)
C3—C4—O2—C7179.7 (4)
Symmetry code: (i) x, y+1, z.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C7—H7···O1ii0.932.553.407 (6)153
Symmetry code: (ii) x1/2, y+1/2, z1.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC13H6O4S5
Mr386.48
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, Cm
Temperature (K)293
a, b, c (Å)7.2228 (11), 24.518 (3), 5.0330 (7)
β (°) 120.521 (10)
V3)767.79 (19)
Z2
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)0.77
Crystal size (mm)0.39 × 0.32 × 0.12
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker P4
diffractometer
Absorption correctionψ scan
(XSCANS; Bruker, 1996)
Tmin, Tmax0.73, 0.88
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
1644, 1316, 1064
Rint0.026
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.735
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.035, 0.091, 1.02
No. of reflections1316
No. of parameters104
No. of restraints2
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.39, 0.33
Absolute structureFlack (1983), with 263 Friedel pairs
Absolute structure parameter0.11 (13)

Computer programs: XSCANS (Bruker, 1996), XSCANS, SHELXTL (Bruker, 1997), SIR97 (Altomare et al., 1999), SHELXTL and PLATON (Spek, 2003).

Selected geometric parameters (Å, º) top
C1—S11.643 (5)C3—S31.799 (4)
C1—S21.725 (3)C4—C51.345 (6)
C2—C2i1.362 (6)C4—O21.355 (5)
C2—S21.737 (3)C5—C61.403 (6)
C2—S31.751 (3)C6—C71.318 (8)
C3—O11.201 (5)C7—O21.354 (6)
C3—C41.447 (5)
S1—C1—S2123.22 (13)C5—C4—C3132.9 (3)
S2—C1—S2i113.5 (3)O2—C4—C3117.6 (3)
C2i—C2—S2115.99 (10)C4—C5—C6107.2 (4)
C2i—C2—S3120.31 (10)C7—C6—C5105.7 (4)
S2—C2—S3123.07 (17)C6—C7—O2111.8 (4)
O1—C3—C4125.8 (3)C4—O2—C7105.7 (4)
O1—C3—S3123.7 (3)C1—S2—C297.15 (16)
C4—C3—S3110.5 (3)C2—S3—C3102.70 (17)
C5—C4—O2109.5 (3)
C2i—C2—S3—C3151.2 (4)S2—C2—S3—C338.3 (3)
Symmetry code: (i) x, y+1, z.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C7—H7···O1ii0.932.553.407 (6)153
Symmetry code: (ii) x1/2, y+1/2, z1.
 

Follow Acta Cryst. C
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds