Download citation
Download citation
link to html
The metastable orange crystals of HgI_2 comprise three different crystal structures, all of which are built from corner-linked Hg_4I_{10} supertetrahedra. Two of them are end members with the maximum degree of order (MDO) of a polytypic layer structure; the third shows a three-dimensional linkage. This paper presents the determination from X-ray diffraction data of the tetragonal polytypic structures and their stacking disorder. Diffraction patterns show sharp Bragg reflections and rods of diffuse intensity with pronounced maxima. In a first step, the diffuse intensity was neglected and all maxima were treated as Bragg reflections. The crystal was supposed to be a conglomerate of the two MDO structures diffracting independently, and their parameters and volume ratio were refined against the single data set. The geometries and anisotropic displacement parameters of the layers in the two structures are shown to be nearly identical. Layer contacts in the two stacking modes are identical. The structures are fractal complications of the stable red form of HgI_2. In a second step, the stacking disorder has been quantitatively analyzed with a Markov chain model. Two probabilities describing next-nearest-layer interactions were visually adjusted to observed intensity profiles extracted from image-plate detector data. Results consistently show that the crystal comprises nearly equal volumes of MDO structures with an average domain thickness of about 5 layers or 30 Å.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S010876810201618X/bk0119sup1.cif
Contains datablocks global, I, II

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S010876810201618X/bk0119sup2.hkl
Supplementary material

Computing details top

For both compounds, data collection: Kuma CrysAlis; cell refinement: Kuma CrysAlis; data reduction: Kuma CrysAlis; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1990); program(s) used to refine structure: STACK (Birkedal et al., 1998); molecular graphics: Cerius2; software used to prepare material for publication: Cerius2, Bruker SHELXTL.

Figures top
[Figure 1]
[Figure 2]
[Figure 3]
[Figure 4]
[Figure 5]
[Figure 6]
[Figure 7]
(I) top
Crystal data top
HgI2Melting point: 529 K
Mr = 454.39Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Tetragonal, I41/amdCell parameters from 618 reflections
a = 8.7863 (5) Åθ = 14.3–24.1°
c = 24.667 (3) ŵ = 45.09 mm1
V = 1904.3 (4) Å3T = 200 K
Z = 16Truncated pyramid, orange
F(000) = 29760.10 × 0.10 × 0.02 mm
Dx = 6.340 Mg m3
Data collection top
Kuma CCD
diffractometer
585 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube585 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.073
Detector resolution: 17.07 pixels mm-1θmax = 26.6°, θmin = 3.7°
ω scansh = 07
Absorption correction: analytical
based on the shape of the crystal
k = 010
Tmin = 0.017, Tmax = 0.411l = 030
843 measured reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F0 restraints
Least-squares matrix: fullPrimary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.065Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
wR(F2) = 0.131 w = 1/[σ2(Yo2) + (0.0303P)2 + 4.60896P]
where P = (Yo + 2Yc)/3
S = 1.07(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
585 reflectionsΔρmax = not computed with STACK e Å3
20 parametersΔρmin = not computed with STACK e Å3
Crystal data top
HgI2Z = 16
Mr = 454.39Mo Kα radiation
Tetragonal, I41/amdµ = 45.09 mm1
a = 8.7863 (5) ÅT = 200 K
c = 24.667 (3) Å0.10 × 0.10 × 0.02 mm
V = 1904.3 (4) Å3
Data collection top
Kuma CCD
diffractometer
585 independent reflections
Absorption correction: analytical
based on the shape of the crystal
585 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.017, Tmax = 0.411Rint = 0.073
843 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.06520 parameters
wR(F2) = 0.1310 restraints
S = 1.07Δρmax = not computed with STACK e Å3
585 reflectionsΔρmin = not computed with STACK e Å3
Special details top

Refinement. STACK program allows the refinement of several structures against a single data-set. It has been used for the refinement of two structures that are end-members with maximum degree of order (MDO) of a polytypic layer structure. See the text for more details.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Hg0.74792 (15)0.250.06232 (1)0.0315 (2)
I10.500.750.25752 (9)0.0249 (6)
I20.76416 (14)0.51416 (14)0.1250.0331 (3)
I30.500.250.25758 (12)0.0333 (7)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Hg0.0266 (4)0.0360 (4)0.0318 (2)0.00.0003 (3)0.0
I10.0304 (11)0.0261 (10)0.0182 (9)0.00.00.0
I20.0313 (4)0.0313 (4)0.0364 (6)0.0034 (4)0.0001 (2)0.0001 (2)
I30.0335 (12)0.0355 (12)0.0308 (12)0.00.00.0
(II) top
Crystal data top
HgI2Melting point: 529 K
Mr = 454.39Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Tetragonal, P42/nmcCell parameters from 618 reflections
a = 8.7863 (5) Åθ = 14.3–24.1°
c = 12.334 (3) ŵ = 45.09 mm1
V = 952.2 (2) Å3T = 200 K
Z = 8Truncated pyramid, orange
F(000) = 14880.10 × 0.10 × 0.02 mm
Dx = 6.340 Mg m3
Data collection top
Kuma CCD
diffractometer
570 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube570 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.073
Detector resolution: 17.07 pixels mm-1θmax = 26.6°, θmin = 3.7°
ω scansh = 07
Absorption correction: analytical
based on the shape of the crystal
k = 010
Tmin = 0.017, Tmax = 0.411l = 030
843 measured reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F0 restraints
Least-squares matrix: fullPrimary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.066Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
wR(F2) = 0.133 w = 1/[σ2(Yo2) + (0.0303P)2 + 4.60896P]
where P = (Yo + 2Yc)/3
S = 1.07(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
570 reflectionsΔρmax = not computed with STACK e Å3
20 parametersΔρmin = not computed with STACK e Å3
Crystal data top
HgI2Z = 8
Mr = 454.39Mo Kα radiation
Tetragonal, P42/nmcµ = 45.09 mm1
a = 8.7863 (5) ÅT = 200 K
c = 12.334 (3) Å0.10 × 0.10 × 0.02 mm
V = 952.2 (2) Å3
Data collection top
Kuma CCD
diffractometer
570 independent reflections
Absorption correction: analytical
based on the shape of the crystal
570 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.017, Tmax = 0.411Rint = 0.073
843 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.06620 parameters
wR(F2) = 0.1330 restraints
S = 1.07Δρmax = not computed with STACK e Å3
570 reflectionsΔρmin = not computed with STACK e Å3
Special details top

Refinement. STACK program allows the refinement of several structures against a single data-set. It has been used for the refinement of two structures that are end-members with maximum degree of order (MDO) of a polytypic layer structure. See the text for more details.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Hg0.50043 (19)0.750.12481 (13)0.0399 (5)
I10.250.250.5165 (3)0.0343 (10)
I20.51381 (17)0.01381 (17)0.250.0292 (4)
I30.250.750.5136 (3)0.0316 (9)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Hg0.0367 (7)0.0446 (7)0.0385 (11)0.00.0008 (3)0.0
I10.058 (2)0.0146 (13)0.0301 (14)0.00.00.0
I20.0302 (7)0.0302 (7)0.0272 (8)0.0029 (5)0.0008 (3)0.0008 (3)
I30.0454 (18)0.0282 (16)0.0211 (14)0.00.00.0

Experimental details

(I)(II)
Crystal data
Chemical formulaHgI2HgI2
Mr454.39454.39
Crystal system, space groupTetragonal, I41/amdTetragonal, P42/nmc
Temperature (K)200200
a, c (Å)8.7863 (5), 24.667 (3)8.7863 (5), 12.334 (3)
V3)1904.3 (4)952.2 (2)
Z168
Radiation typeMo KαMo Kα
µ (mm1)45.0945.09
Crystal size (mm)0.10 × 0.10 × 0.020.10 × 0.10 × 0.02
Data collection
DiffractometerKuma CCD
diffractometer
Kuma CCD
diffractometer
Absorption correctionAnalytical
based on the shape of the crystal
Analytical
based on the shape of the crystal
Tmin, Tmax0.017, 0.4110.017, 0.411
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
843, 585, 585 843, 570, 570
Rint0.0730.073
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.6300.630
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.065, 0.131, 1.07 0.066, 0.133, 1.07
No. of reflections585570
No. of parameters2020
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)not computed with STACK, not computed with STACKnot computed with STACK, not computed with STACK

Computer programs: Kuma CrysAlis, SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1990), STACK (Birkedal et al., 1998), Cerius2, Bruker SHELXTL.

 

Follow Acta Cryst. B
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds