Download citation
Download citation
link to html
The mol­ecule of the title compound, C8H7NO2, also known as 6-amino­phthalide, is essentially planar. In the crystal structure, the mol­ecules are connected into supra­molecular double chains via N—H...O hydrogen bonds that participate in eight-membered (...HNH...O)2 synthons.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807035763/hb2488sup1.cif
Contains datablocks global, I

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807035763/hb2488Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

CCDC reference: 657867

Key indicators

  • Single-crystal X-ray study
  • T = 153 K
  • Mean [sigma](C-C) = 0.002 Å
  • R factor = 0.042
  • wR factor = 0.105
  • Data-to-parameter ratio = 13.5

checkCIF/PLATON results

No syntax errors found



Alert level C PLAT152_ALERT_1_C Supplied and Calc Volume s.u. Inconsistent ..... ?
Alert level G PLAT860_ALERT_3_G Note: Number of Least-Squares Restraints ....... 2
0 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem 0 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem 1 ALERT level C = Check and explain 1 ALERT level G = General alerts; check 1 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 0 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 1 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 0 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion 0 ALERT type 5 Informative message, check

Comment top

The title compound (I), Fig. 1, was synthesized as a precursor for the corresponding polyamide. The maximum deviation from the least-squares plane through the 11 non-hydrogen atoms in (I) is 0.020 (1) Å, for the C5 atom. The geometric parameters in (I) match closely those reported for the isomeric 5-aminophthalide compound (Yathirajan et al., 2005). The primary intermolecular interactions in the crystal structure of (I) are of the type N—H···O (Table 1). The presence of eight-membered {···HNH···O}2 synthons leads to the formation of supramolecular double-chains aligned along the a direction (Fig. 2). This arrangement brings π-systems in close proximity and allows for the formation of π···π interactions that provide additional stability to the chains. The closest π···π contact of 3.7360 (15) Å occurs between Cg(O2, C1—C3, C8) and Cg(C3—C8) for symmetry operation: 1 - x, -y, 2 - z. The chains are linked by C—H···O interactions (Table 1) to form layers that stack along the c direction. Contacts between layers are of the type C—H···π so that C4—H4···Cg(C3—C8) = 2.74 Å, C4···Cg(C3—C8) = 3.4663 (18) Å with an angle at H = 134° for symmetry operation: 1/2 - x, -1/2 + y, 3/2 - z.

Related literature top

For related literature, see: Yathirajan et al. (2005).

Experimental top

The reagents were purchased as indicated and used without further purification: phthalide (98%, Alfa Aesar), N-bromosuccinimide (NBS) (99%, Alfa Aesar), 2,2'-Azobis(2-methylpropionitrile) (AIBN) (98%, Aldrich), benzene (99%, EM Science), sulfuric acid (98%, Mallinckrodt), nitric acid (70%, EMD), acetic acid (99.7%, Mallinckrodt), benzylamine (99%, Aldrich), dichloroethane (Aldrich), ethyl acetate (EMD), hexane (EMD), and methanol (Fisher).

The title compound (I) was obtained from two step nitration-reduction sequence. To a 250 ml round bottom flask, fitted with magnetic stirbar and an ice/water cooling bath, phthalide (21.74 g, 162 mmol) was added. An ice-cold mixture of 70% nitric acid and concentrated sulfuric acid were added at such a rate that the temperature remained below 20°C. The reaction mixture was allowed to stand overnight at room temperature. The clear yellow solution was poured into ice-cold water (300 ml). The yellow precipitate was collected and recrystallized from glacial acetic acid to give 6-nitrophthalide (81%). In a 250 round bottom flask equipped with a stirbar, 6-nitrophthalide (4.90 g, 27.4 mmol) was dissolved in ethanol (100 ml) with heating. At the same time, ammonium chloride (14.78 g, 0.276 mol) was completely dissolved in water (40 ml). To an ethanol solution of iron powder (9.26 g, 0.166 mol) was added the 6-nitrophthalide solution, followed immediately by the ammonium chloride solution. This resulted in an exotherm and the reaction turned brown immediately. The reaction mixture was heated under reflux overnight, and cooled to room temperature. Ethyl acetate was then used to extract the product, and the organic extracts were then washed with sodium bicarbonate and water give a white powder as the product (65%). Light-yellow crystals of (I) were obtained by recrystallization from a methanol solution.

TLC Rf = 0.38 (50/50 hexane/ethyl acetate). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ (p.p.m.) 5.23 (s, 2H, α-CH–), 6.99 (dd, 1H, aromatic 7-H, J1 = 1.96 Hz, J2 = 8.30 Hz), 7.14 (d, 1H, aromatic 5-H, J = 2.44 Hz), 7.25 (d, 1H, aromatic 4-H, J = 8.30 Hz). IR (cm-1) 3500 (–NH2), 3300 (–NH2), 1727 (–COO), 1630, 1615, 1505, 1491, 1465, 1329, 1187, 1056, 989.

Refinement top

All the H atoms were included in the riding-model approximation, with C—H = 0.95–0.99 Å, N—H = 0.88 Å, and with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C) and 1.5Ueq(N).

Structure description top

The title compound (I), Fig. 1, was synthesized as a precursor for the corresponding polyamide. The maximum deviation from the least-squares plane through the 11 non-hydrogen atoms in (I) is 0.020 (1) Å, for the C5 atom. The geometric parameters in (I) match closely those reported for the isomeric 5-aminophthalide compound (Yathirajan et al., 2005). The primary intermolecular interactions in the crystal structure of (I) are of the type N—H···O (Table 1). The presence of eight-membered {···HNH···O}2 synthons leads to the formation of supramolecular double-chains aligned along the a direction (Fig. 2). This arrangement brings π-systems in close proximity and allows for the formation of π···π interactions that provide additional stability to the chains. The closest π···π contact of 3.7360 (15) Å occurs between Cg(O2, C1—C3, C8) and Cg(C3—C8) for symmetry operation: 1 - x, -y, 2 - z. The chains are linked by C—H···O interactions (Table 1) to form layers that stack along the c direction. Contacts between layers are of the type C—H···π so that C4—H4···Cg(C3—C8) = 2.74 Å, C4···Cg(C3—C8) = 3.4663 (18) Å with an angle at H = 134° for symmetry operation: 1/2 - x, -1/2 + y, 3/2 - z.

For related literature, see: Yathirajan et al. (2005).

Computing details top

Data collection: CrystalClear (Rigaku/MSC, 2005); cell refinement: CrystalClear; data reduction: CrystalClear; program(s) used to solve structure: SIR92 (Altomare et al., 1994); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: ORTEPII (Johnson, 1976) and DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2006); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. Molecular structure of (I) showing atom-labelling scheme and displacement ellipsoids at the 50% probability level (arbitrary spheres for the H atoms).
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. View of the crystal packing in (I) highlighting the supramolecular double-chains mediated by hydrogen bonds, shown as orange-dashed lines. Colour code: red (oxygen), blue (nitrogen), grey (carbon) and green (hydrogen).
6-Amino-3H-isobenzofuran-1-one top
Crystal data top
C8H7NO2F(000) = 312
Mr = 149.15Dx = 1.424 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71070 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ynCell parameters from 1986 reflections
a = 8.396 (2) Åθ = 2.7–30.2°
b = 5.990 (2) ŵ = 0.10 mm1
c = 14.012 (4) ÅT = 153 K
β = 99.242 (7)°Prism, light yellow
V = 695.5 (4) Å30.40 × 0.20 × 0.10 mm
Z = 4
Data collection top
Rigaku AFC12κ/SATURN724
diffractometer
1370 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tubeRint = 0.020
Graphite monochromatorθmax = 26.5°, θmin = 2.7°
ω scansh = 1010
4579 measured reflectionsk = 76
1436 independent reflectionsl = 1417
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.042Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.105H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.13 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0459P)2 + 0.2023P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1436 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
106 parametersΔρmax = 0.21 e Å3
2 restraintsΔρmin = 0.15 e Å3
Crystal data top
C8H7NO2V = 695.5 (4) Å3
Mr = 149.15Z = 4
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation
a = 8.396 (2) ŵ = 0.10 mm1
b = 5.990 (2) ÅT = 153 K
c = 14.012 (4) Å0.40 × 0.20 × 0.10 mm
β = 99.242 (7)°
Data collection top
Rigaku AFC12κ/SATURN724
diffractometer
1370 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
4579 measured reflectionsRint = 0.020
1436 independent reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0422 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.105H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.13Δρmax = 0.21 e Å3
1436 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.15 e Å3
106 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O10.74553 (11)0.30158 (17)0.91253 (7)0.0408 (3)
O20.71640 (11)0.03455 (17)0.84229 (7)0.0393 (3)
N10.10635 (15)0.3245 (3)0.94360 (11)0.0529 (4)
H1N0.00670.27700.94180.079*
H2N0.13670.44370.97850.079*
C10.65841 (15)0.1465 (2)0.88321 (9)0.0321 (3)
C20.58839 (16)0.1970 (2)0.81381 (11)0.0386 (3)
H2A0.61350.34050.84790.046*
H2B0.57260.22400.74320.046*
C30.44184 (15)0.0911 (2)0.84286 (9)0.0301 (3)
C40.28242 (16)0.1620 (2)0.83663 (9)0.0330 (3)
H40.24940.30280.80910.040*
C50.17340 (15)0.0233 (2)0.87133 (9)0.0337 (3)
H50.06480.07140.86770.040*
C60.21809 (15)0.1874 (2)0.91198 (9)0.0339 (3)
C70.37826 (15)0.2566 (2)0.91822 (9)0.0318 (3)
H70.41250.39720.94550.038*
C80.48546 (14)0.1144 (2)0.88350 (9)0.0285 (3)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0281 (5)0.0427 (6)0.0506 (6)0.0048 (4)0.0037 (4)0.0033 (5)
O20.0287 (5)0.0412 (6)0.0494 (6)0.0035 (4)0.0102 (4)0.0034 (4)
N10.0270 (6)0.0604 (9)0.0721 (9)0.0014 (6)0.0100 (6)0.0306 (7)
C10.0268 (6)0.0359 (7)0.0334 (7)0.0028 (5)0.0044 (5)0.0026 (5)
C20.0338 (7)0.0351 (7)0.0479 (8)0.0029 (5)0.0094 (6)0.0051 (6)
C30.0305 (7)0.0299 (6)0.0301 (6)0.0021 (5)0.0055 (5)0.0010 (5)
C40.0340 (7)0.0307 (6)0.0339 (7)0.0030 (5)0.0037 (5)0.0018 (5)
C50.0264 (6)0.0399 (7)0.0347 (7)0.0031 (5)0.0049 (5)0.0005 (5)
C60.0275 (6)0.0406 (7)0.0331 (7)0.0032 (5)0.0035 (5)0.0053 (5)
C70.0274 (6)0.0339 (7)0.0330 (7)0.0012 (5)0.0018 (5)0.0062 (5)
C80.0259 (6)0.0315 (6)0.0276 (6)0.0006 (5)0.0024 (5)0.0018 (5)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
O1—C11.2123 (16)C3—C81.3808 (18)
O2—C11.3535 (17)C3—C41.3937 (18)
O2—C21.4570 (17)C4—C51.3810 (19)
N1—C61.3726 (18)C4—H40.9500
N1—H1N0.8801C5—C61.4104 (19)
N1—H2N0.8801C5—H50.9500
C1—C81.4654 (17)C6—C71.3965 (18)
C2—C31.4976 (18)C7—C81.3830 (17)
C2—H2A0.9900C7—H70.9500
C2—H2B0.9900
C1—O2—C2110.57 (10)C5—C4—C3118.60 (12)
C6—N1—H1N119.5C5—C4—H4120.7
C6—N1—H2N120.9C3—C4—H4120.7
H1N—N1—H2N118C4—C5—C6122.15 (12)
O1—C1—O2121.26 (12)C4—C5—H5118.9
O1—C1—C8130.08 (12)C6—C5—H5118.9
O2—C1—C8108.67 (11)N1—C6—C7120.22 (13)
O2—C2—C3104.17 (11)N1—C6—C5120.95 (12)
O2—C2—H2A110.9C7—C6—C5118.82 (12)
C3—C2—H2A110.9C8—C7—C6118.02 (12)
O2—C2—H2B110.9C8—C7—H7121.0
C3—C2—H2B110.9C6—C7—H7121.0
H2A—C2—H2B108.9C3—C8—C7123.33 (12)
C8—C3—C4119.09 (12)C3—C8—C1108.25 (11)
C8—C3—C2108.34 (11)C7—C8—C1128.42 (12)
C4—C3—C2132.58 (13)
C2—O2—C1—O1179.64 (12)C5—C6—C7—C80.33 (19)
C2—O2—C1—C80.42 (14)C4—C3—C8—C70.49 (19)
C1—O2—C2—C30.01 (14)C2—C3—C8—C7179.98 (12)
O2—C2—C3—C80.42 (14)C4—C3—C8—C1178.81 (11)
O2—C2—C3—C4178.97 (13)C2—C3—C8—C10.68 (14)
C8—C3—C4—C50.13 (19)C6—C7—C8—C30.26 (19)
C2—C3—C4—C5179.47 (13)C6—C7—C8—C1178.90 (12)
C3—C4—C5—C60.5 (2)O1—C1—C8—C3179.37 (13)
C4—C5—C6—N1178.26 (14)O2—C1—C8—C30.70 (14)
C4—C5—C6—C70.7 (2)O1—C1—C8—C70.1 (2)
N1—C6—C7—C8178.63 (13)O2—C1—C8—C7179.96 (12)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1N···O1i0.882.172.9937 (19)156
N1—H2N···O1ii0.882.273.134 (2)167
C2—H2A···O1iii0.992.513.477 (2)164
Symmetry codes: (i) x1, y, z; (ii) x+1, y+1, z+2; (iii) x, y1, z.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC8H7NO2
Mr149.15
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/n
Temperature (K)153
a, b, c (Å)8.396 (2), 5.990 (2), 14.012 (4)
β (°) 99.242 (7)
V3)695.5 (4)
Z4
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)0.10
Crystal size (mm)0.40 × 0.20 × 0.10
Data collection
DiffractometerRigaku AFC12κ/SATURN724
Absorption correction
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
4579, 1436, 1370
Rint0.020
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.628
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.042, 0.105, 1.13
No. of reflections1436
No. of parameters106
No. of restraints2
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.21, 0.15

Computer programs: CrystalClear (Rigaku/MSC, 2005), CrystalClear, SIR92 (Altomare et al., 1994), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), ORTEPII (Johnson, 1976) and DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2006), SHELXL97.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1N···O1i0.882.172.9937 (19)156
N1—H2N···O1ii0.882.273.134 (2)167
C2—H2A···O1iii0.992.513.477 (2)164
Symmetry codes: (i) x1, y, z; (ii) x+1, y+1, z+2; (iii) x, y1, z.
 

Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds