Download citation
Download citation

link to html
In the title compound, C18H18F2N2O3S, the piperazine ring adopts a chair conformation. The dihedral angle between the sulfonyl-bound benzene ring and the best fit plane throught the six non-H atoms of the piperazine ring is 69.4 (2)°, while those between the fluoro­benzene and sulfonyl rings and the fluoro­benzene and piperazine rings are 30.97 (2) and 75.98 (2)°, respectively. In the crystal, mol­ecules are connected to form a tetra­meric unit through C—H...O hydrogen bonds. The structure is further stabilized by weak inter­molecular C—H...F inter­actions, generating C(8) and C(7) chains running along [100].

Download citation
Download citation

link to html
In the crystal structure of the title compound, C19H21F3N2O2S, the piperazine ring adopts a chair conformation. The dihedral angles between the mean plane of the piperazine ring and the tosyl and trifluoro­methyl­phenyl rings are 74.52 (3) and 68.30 (2)°, respectively. The sulfonamide N atom deviates from the plane defined by the three attached atoms by 0.327 (1) Å. The crystal structure is stabilized by weak C—H...π inter­actions.

Download citation
Download citation

link to html
In the title compound, C18H20Cl2N2O2S, the piperazine ring adopts a chair conformation. The dihedral angle between the sulfonyl-bound benzene ring and the best-fit plane through the six non-H atoms of the piperazine ring is 72.22 (12)°; those between the di­chloro­benzene ring and the sulfonyl and piperazine rings are 2.44 (13) and 74.16 (2)°, respectively. In the crystal, mol­ecules are connected through weak C—H...O inter­actions into a hexa­meric unit generating a R66(60) motif in the ab plane. The mol­ecules are also connected into C(4) chains through weak C—H...N inter­actions. The solvent used to grow the crystal was a mixture of di­chloro­methane and methanol, but the resulting electron density was uninter­pretable. The solvent contribution to the scattering was removed with the SQUEEZE routine in PLATON [Spek (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148–155]. The formula mass and unit-cell characteristics do not take into account the disordered solvent.

Download citation
Download citation

link to html
In the title compound, C18H20F2N2O2S, the central piperazine ring adopts a chair conformation. The dihedral angle between the two benzene rings is 40.20°, whereas those between the piperazine ring (considering the best fit plane through all the non-H atoms) and the sulfonyl-bound benzene and di­fluoro­benzene rings are 74.96 and 86.16°, respectively. In the crystal, mol­ecules are stacked along the a axis through weak C—H...O and C—H...F inter­actions.

Download citation
Download citation

link to html
In the title compound, C15H15NO4S, the dihedral angle between the benzene rings is 78.62 (16)°. In the crystal, adjacent mol­ecules are linked along the c axis into C(4) chains through strong N—H...O hydrogen bonds. Mol­ecules are further connected through C—H...O hydrogen bonds into a hexa­meric unit generating an R66(66) motif. Another C—H...O inter­action connects the mol­ecules along the c axis, forming C(5) chains. A region of disordered electron density, most probably disordered methanol–water solvent mol­ecules, was treated with the SQUEEZE routine in PLATON [Spek (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148–155]. The formula mass and unit-cell characteristics do not take into account this disordered solvent.

Download citation
Download citation

link to html
The title compound, C14H12ClNO4S, crystallizes with two mol­ecules in the asymmetric unit. The dihedral angles between the benzene rings are 89.68 (1) (mol­ecule 1) and 82.9 (1)° (mol­ecule 2). In each mol­ecule, intra­molecular N—H...O hydrogen bonds between the amide H atom and the meth­oxy O atom generate S(6) loops. In the crystal, mol­ecule 2 is linked into inversion dimers through pairs of C—H...O inter­actions, forming an R22(8) ring motif. Mol­ecules 1 and 2 are further linked along the b-axis direction through C—H...π inter­actions. The crystal structure is further stabilized by several π–π stacking inter­actions [centroid–centroid separations = 3.7793 (1), 3.6697 (1) and 3.6958 (1) Å], thus generating a three-dimensional architecture.
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds