Download citation
Download citation

link to html
(Acetonitrile-1κN)[μ-1H-benzimidazole-2(3H)-thione-1:2κ2S:S][1H-benzimidazole-2(3H)-thione-2κS]bis­(μ-1,1-dioxo-1λ6,2-benzothia­zole-3-thiol­ato)-1:2κ2S3:N;1:2κ2S3:S3-dicopper(I)(CuCu), [Cu2(C7H4NO2S2)2(C7H6N2S)2(CH3CN)] or [Cu2(tsac)2(Sbim)2(CH3CN)] [tsac is thio­saccharinate and Sbim is 1H-benzimidazole-2(3H)-thione], (I), is a new copper(I) compound that consists of a triply bridged dinuclear Cu—Cu unit. In the complex mol­ecule, two tsac anions and one neutral Sbim ligand bind the metals. One anion bridges via the endocyclic N and exocyclic S atoms (μ-S:N). The other anion and one of the mercaptobenzimidazole mol­ecules bridge the metals through their exocyclic S atoms (μ-S:S). The second Sbim ligand coordinates in a monodentate fashion (κS) to one Cu atom, while an acetonitrile mol­ecule coordinates to the other Cu atom. The CuI—CuI distance [2.6286 (6) Å] can be considered a strong `cuprophilic' inter­action. In the case of [μ-1H-benzimidazole-2(3H)-thione-1:2κ2S:S]bis­[1H-benzimidazole-2(3H)-thione]-1κS;2κS-bis­(μ-1,1-dioxo-1λ6,2-benzo­thia­zole-3-thiol­ato)-1:2κ2S3:N;1:2κ2S3:S3-dicopper(I)(CuCu), [Cu2(C7H4NO2S2)2(C7H6N2S)3] or [Cu2(tsac)2(Sbim)3], (II), the acetonitrile mol­ecule is substituted by an additional Sbim ligand, which binds one Cu atom via the exocylic S atom. In this case, the CuI—CuI distance is 2.6068 (11) Å.

Download citation
Download citation

link to html
The triclinic structure of the title compound, cyclo-tetra­kis­(μ-1,1-dioxo-1λ6,2-benzothia­zole-3-thiol­ato-κ2S:S)tetra­kis­[(triphenyl­phosphane-κP)silver(I)], [Ag4(C7H4NO2S2)4(C18H15P)4], is a polymorph of the previously reported monoclinic structure [Dennehy, Mandolesi, Quinzani & Jennings (2007). Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 633, 2746–2752]. In both polymorphs, the complex lies on a crystallographic inversion centre and the bond distances are closely comparable. Some differences can be found in the inter­atomic angles and torsion angles involving the inner Ag4S4 skeleton. The polymorphs contain essentially identical two-dimensional layers, but with different layer stacking arrangements. In the triclinic form, all layers are related by lattice translation, while in the monoclinic form they are arranged around glide planes so that adjacent layers are mirrored with respect to each other.
Follow Acta Cryst. C
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds