Download citation
Acta Cryst. (2014). A70, C327
Download citation

link to html
Although macromolecular crystallography has been greatly accelerated by the development of automated software for data processing, phasing, and model building, most structures require significant manual intervention to yield a truly final model. In addition to missing individual protein or nucleic residues, this may include the addition of alternate conformations, ligands (both free and covalently bound), elemental ions, or modified amino acids. We have developed a number of tools to streamline several of these steps within the Phenix software suite (Adams et al. 2010): 1) an automated pipeline for the determination of ligand-bound structures by molecular replacement (Echols et al. 2014a); 2) placement of elemental ions during refinement (Echols et al. 2014b), as an extension of solvent placement; 3) fitting of additional conformations of protein residues into difference density. These tools reliably reproduce published structures in a majority of test cases, and in several instances identify details omitted by the original authors. Their low false positive rate makes them suitable for use in high-throughput workflows.

Download citation
Acta Cryst. (2014). A70, C782
Download citation

link to html
Refinement of macromolecular structures against low-resolution crystallographic data is limited by the ability of current methods to arrive at a high-quality structure with realistic geometry. We have developed a new method for crystallographic refinement which combines the Rosetta sampling methodology and all atom energy function with likelihood-based reciprocal space refinement in Phenix, and find, on a test set of difficult low-resolution refinement cases, that models refined with the new method have significantly improved model geometry, and in most cases, lower free R factors and RMS deviation to the final model. Integration of the software packages additionally makes advanced sampling methods used in structure prediction and design available for crystallographic refinement and model-building, and also provides a strategy for improving the Rosetta force field for better agreement with experimental data.

Download citation
Acta Cryst. (2014). A70, C1493
Download citation

link to html
"We present the crystal structure of AcrB in complex with Linezolid[1]. AcrB is an inner-membrane Resistance-Nodulation-Division efflux pump and is part of the AcrAB-TolC multidrug-resistance tripartite efflux system in E. Coli. Crystal structures of AcrB by itself as well as several drug-bound complexes have been structurally characterized. Linezolid is an approved oxazolidinone antibiotic used for the treatment of serious infections caused by Gram-positive bacteria that are resistant to other antibiotics, and has been called a ""reserve antibiotic"", a drug of last resort against potentially intractable infections. This antibiotic inhibits bacterial protein synthesis by specifically binding to the 50S ribosomal subunit. Linezolid has no clinically significant effect on most Gram-negative bacteria. This is thought to be a result of relatively low intracellular concentration of Linezolid due to efflux, but there is no direct evidence yet to support this hypothesis. This membrane protein-drug complex shows that an antibiotic specific to Gram-positive bacteria can also bind an efflux pump from E. coli, a Gram-negative bacterium. The crystal structure of AcrB and Linezolid complex reveals that Linezolid binds to the A385/F386 loops of the symmetric trimers of AcrB in the same fashion as several other antibiotics that are extruded by efflux pumps. A conformational change of a loop in the bottom of the periplasmic cleft is also observed."
Follow Acta Cryst. A
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds