Buy article online - an online subscription or single-article purchase is required to access this article.
Download citation
Download citation
link to html
In the structure of the title compound, C12H9NO5S, the phenyl and 4-nitro­phenyl rings are not coplanar, the dihedral angle being 53.91 (4)°. The structure contains weak inter­molecular C—H...O hydrogen bonds and face-to-face π–π inter­actions between symmetry-related phenyl rings (separation 3.664 Å).

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807034381/wn2171sup1.cif
Contains datablocks I, global

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807034381/wn2171Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

CCDC reference: 659090

Key indicators

  • Single-crystal X-ray study
  • T = 120 K
  • Mean [sigma](C-C) = 0.002 Å
  • R factor = 0.034
  • wR factor = 0.093
  • Data-to-parameter ratio = 16.5

checkCIF/PLATON results

No syntax errors found



Alert level C ABSTM02_ALERT_3_C The ratio of expected to reported Tmax/Tmin(RR') is < 0.90 Tmin and Tmax reported: 0.799 1.000 Tmin(prime) and Tmax expected: 0.917 0.945 RR(prime) = 0.823 Please check that your absorption correction is appropriate. PLAT061_ALERT_3_C Tmax/Tmin Range Test RR' too Large ............. 0.82 PLAT062_ALERT_4_C Rescale T(min) & T(max) by ..................... 0.94
Alert level G ABSTM02_ALERT_3_G When printed, the submitted absorption T values will be replaced by the scaled T values. Since the ratio of scaled T's is identical to the ratio of reported T values, the scaling does not imply a change to the absorption corrections used in the study. Ratio of Tmax expected/reported 0.945 Tmax scaled 0.945 Tmin scaled 0.755
0 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem 0 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem 3 ALERT level C = Check and explain 1 ALERT level G = General alerts; check 0 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 0 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 3 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 1 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion 0 ALERT type 5 Informative message, check

Comment top

Aromatic sulfonates are used in monitoring the merging of lipids (Yachi et al., 1989) and in many other fields (Spungin et al., 1992, Tharakan et al.,1992, Alford et al., 1991, Jiang et al., 1990, Narayanan & Krakow, 1983). An X-ray study of the title compound was undertaken in order to determine its crystal and molecular structure owing to the biological importance of its analogues. The molecular structure of the title compound, C12H9NO5S, is shown in Fig. 1 with selected torsion angles provided in Table 1. The S—C, S—O and S=O bond lengths are all comparable to those found in related structures previously reported by our research group (Manivannan et al. 2005 & references cited therein).

A Newman projection along the O10—S1 bond is shown in Fig. 2. Using C11 as a reference point, the orientations of the two sulfonyl oxygen atoms (O8 and O9) and the phenyl carbon (C2) have been deduced from the corresponding torsion angles (C11–O10–S1–O8/O9/C2). Helical nomenclature is followed in assigning + or -synclinal and -antiperiplanar conformations. The C2–S1–O10–C11 torsion angle of 75.2 (1)° corresponds to +synclinal conformation. The dihedral angle between the mean planes of the phenyl and 4-nitrophenyl rings of 53.91 (4)° shows that the two rings are not coplanar. This is similar to the situation reported by us for other aromatic sulfonates (Manivannan et al. 2005 & references cited therein).

The crystal structure of the title compound is stabilized by the presence of weak intermolecular C—H···O (Fig. 3) (Desiraju et al., 1999) (Table 2) and π···π interactions. The symmetry related phenyl rings (C2—C7) [2 - x, 1 - y, -z] interact in a face to face manner with a separation of 3.664 Å.

Related literature top

For a detailed account of the molecular and supramolecular architectures of aromatic sulfonates, see Manivannan et al. (2005) and references cited therein.

For related literature, see: Alford et al. (1991); Desiraju & Steiner (1999); Jiang et al. (1990); Narayanan & Krakow (1983); Spungin et al. (1992); Tharakan et al. (1992); Yachi et al. (1989).

Experimental top

Benzenesulfonyl chloride (10 mmol), dissolved in acetone (10 ml), was added dropwise to 4-nitrophenol (10 mmol) in aqueous NaOH (8 ml, 5%) with constant stirring. The precipitate (6.5 mmol, yield 65%) was filtered and recrystallized from an acetone/ethanol (1:10) mixture.

Refinement top

All H atoms were located in difference maps and their positions and isotropic displacement parameters freely refined. The range of refined C—H distances was 0.91 (2) - 0.99 (2) Å.

Structure description top

Aromatic sulfonates are used in monitoring the merging of lipids (Yachi et al., 1989) and in many other fields (Spungin et al., 1992, Tharakan et al.,1992, Alford et al., 1991, Jiang et al., 1990, Narayanan & Krakow, 1983). An X-ray study of the title compound was undertaken in order to determine its crystal and molecular structure owing to the biological importance of its analogues. The molecular structure of the title compound, C12H9NO5S, is shown in Fig. 1 with selected torsion angles provided in Table 1. The S—C, S—O and S=O bond lengths are all comparable to those found in related structures previously reported by our research group (Manivannan et al. 2005 & references cited therein).

A Newman projection along the O10—S1 bond is shown in Fig. 2. Using C11 as a reference point, the orientations of the two sulfonyl oxygen atoms (O8 and O9) and the phenyl carbon (C2) have been deduced from the corresponding torsion angles (C11–O10–S1–O8/O9/C2). Helical nomenclature is followed in assigning + or -synclinal and -antiperiplanar conformations. The C2–S1–O10–C11 torsion angle of 75.2 (1)° corresponds to +synclinal conformation. The dihedral angle between the mean planes of the phenyl and 4-nitrophenyl rings of 53.91 (4)° shows that the two rings are not coplanar. This is similar to the situation reported by us for other aromatic sulfonates (Manivannan et al. 2005 & references cited therein).

The crystal structure of the title compound is stabilized by the presence of weak intermolecular C—H···O (Fig. 3) (Desiraju et al., 1999) (Table 2) and π···π interactions. The symmetry related phenyl rings (C2—C7) [2 - x, 1 - y, -z] interact in a face to face manner with a separation of 3.664 Å.

For a detailed account of the molecular and supramolecular architectures of aromatic sulfonates, see Manivannan et al. (2005) and references cited therein.

For related literature, see: Alford et al. (1991); Desiraju & Steiner (1999); Jiang et al. (1990); Narayanan & Krakow (1983); Spungin et al. (1992); Tharakan et al. (1992); Yachi et al. (1989).

Computing details top

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 1998); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2003); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997) and PLATON (Spek, 2003); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The molecular structure of the title compound, with the atoms labelled and displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level for all non-H atoms. H-atoms are drawn as spheres of arbitrary radius.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. A Newman projection along the O10—S1 bond with C11 as a reference point, +/-sc = +/-synclinal, -ap = -antiperiplanar.
[Figure 3] Fig. 3. The molecular packing. Dashed lines represent the weak C—H···O interactions.
4-Nitrophenyl benzenesulfonate top
Crystal data top
C12H9NO5SF(000) = 576
Mr = 279.26Dx = 1.529 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMelting point = 340–342 K
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 10.015 (3) ÅCell parameters from 8716 reflections
b = 10.852 (4) Åθ = 2.6–30.0°
c = 11.396 (4) ŵ = 0.28 mm1
β = 101.651 (8)°T = 120 K
V = 1213.0 (7) Å3Block, colourless
Z = 40.30 × 0.24 × 0.20 mm
Data collection top
Bruker SMART CCD 1K area-detector
diffractometer
3437 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube2586 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.036
Detector resolution: 8 pixels mm-1θmax = 30.3°, θmin = 2.1°
ω scansh = 1413
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 1998)
k = 1515
Tmin = 0.799, Tmax = 1.000l = 1515
23602 measured reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.035Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.093All H-atom parameters refined
S = 1.04 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0403P)2 + 0.5272P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
3437 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
208 parametersΔρmax = 0.36 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.38 e Å3
Crystal data top
C12H9NO5SV = 1213.0 (7) Å3
Mr = 279.26Z = 4
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation
a = 10.015 (3) ŵ = 0.28 mm1
b = 10.852 (4) ÅT = 120 K
c = 11.396 (4) Å0.30 × 0.24 × 0.20 mm
β = 101.651 (8)°
Data collection top
Bruker SMART CCD 1K area-detector
diffractometer
3437 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 1998)
2586 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.799, Tmax = 1.000Rint = 0.036
23602 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0350 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.093All H-atom parameters refined
S = 1.04Δρmax = 0.36 e Å3
3437 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.38 e Å3
208 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
S10.88009 (4)0.64514 (3)0.20115 (3)0.02644 (10)
C20.84763 (14)0.53463 (13)0.08707 (13)0.0241 (3)
C30.77611 (15)0.56938 (15)0.02609 (13)0.0270 (3)
C40.75429 (15)0.48225 (16)0.11640 (14)0.0298 (3)
C50.80280 (15)0.36285 (15)0.09411 (14)0.0302 (3)
C60.87286 (16)0.32943 (15)0.01874 (15)0.0312 (3)
C70.89596 (15)0.41514 (14)0.11100 (14)0.0278 (3)
O80.98137 (11)0.59973 (11)0.29756 (9)0.0316 (2)
O90.89369 (13)0.76432 (10)0.15216 (10)0.0361 (3)
O100.73797 (11)0.65581 (10)0.24513 (9)0.0296 (2)
C110.70056 (15)0.56091 (13)0.31653 (13)0.0248 (3)
C120.75723 (16)0.55939 (14)0.43750 (13)0.0270 (3)
C130.71255 (15)0.47233 (14)0.50931 (13)0.0273 (3)
C140.61342 (14)0.38957 (13)0.45633 (13)0.0250 (3)
C150.55842 (15)0.38921 (15)0.33496 (14)0.0278 (3)
C160.60276 (15)0.47702 (15)0.26344 (13)0.0285 (3)
N170.56559 (13)0.29760 (13)0.53293 (12)0.0313 (3)
O180.59839 (14)0.31087 (12)0.64123 (11)0.0432 (3)
O190.49469 (14)0.21269 (13)0.48477 (12)0.0470 (3)
H30.7429 (19)0.6529 (17)0.0389 (16)0.034 (5)*
H40.7063 (19)0.5073 (18)0.1976 (17)0.035 (5)*
H50.7882 (19)0.3017 (17)0.1583 (16)0.035 (5)*
H60.910 (2)0.2527 (19)0.0343 (17)0.040 (5)*
H70.9479 (19)0.3944 (18)0.1900 (17)0.037 (5)*
H120.8242 (18)0.6151 (17)0.4690 (16)0.032 (5)*
H130.7501 (19)0.4703 (17)0.5940 (17)0.037 (5)*
H150.4911 (19)0.3330 (17)0.3031 (16)0.033 (5)*
H160.5667 (19)0.4819 (17)0.1794 (17)0.036 (5)*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
S10.03116 (19)0.02337 (18)0.02263 (18)0.00350 (14)0.00035 (13)0.00245 (14)
C20.0232 (6)0.0247 (7)0.0236 (7)0.0038 (5)0.0031 (5)0.0018 (5)
C30.0258 (7)0.0282 (8)0.0256 (7)0.0013 (6)0.0020 (5)0.0038 (6)
C40.0238 (7)0.0379 (9)0.0262 (7)0.0013 (6)0.0014 (6)0.0000 (6)
C50.0244 (7)0.0327 (8)0.0332 (8)0.0067 (6)0.0053 (6)0.0058 (7)
C60.0285 (7)0.0246 (8)0.0395 (9)0.0027 (6)0.0047 (6)0.0006 (6)
C70.0261 (7)0.0270 (8)0.0287 (7)0.0019 (6)0.0015 (6)0.0054 (6)
O80.0310 (6)0.0351 (6)0.0252 (5)0.0033 (5)0.0024 (4)0.0015 (4)
O90.0514 (7)0.0252 (6)0.0289 (6)0.0094 (5)0.0014 (5)0.0040 (4)
O100.0357 (6)0.0248 (5)0.0275 (5)0.0053 (4)0.0044 (4)0.0047 (4)
C110.0287 (7)0.0218 (7)0.0239 (7)0.0052 (5)0.0052 (5)0.0003 (5)
C120.0315 (7)0.0238 (7)0.0243 (7)0.0010 (6)0.0023 (6)0.0053 (6)
C130.0309 (7)0.0298 (8)0.0202 (7)0.0025 (6)0.0028 (6)0.0033 (6)
C140.0251 (7)0.0245 (7)0.0263 (7)0.0052 (5)0.0073 (5)0.0002 (5)
C150.0237 (7)0.0301 (8)0.0283 (7)0.0002 (6)0.0024 (6)0.0052 (6)
C160.0274 (7)0.0343 (8)0.0217 (7)0.0029 (6)0.0001 (6)0.0024 (6)
N170.0275 (6)0.0331 (7)0.0346 (7)0.0027 (5)0.0093 (5)0.0035 (6)
O180.0566 (8)0.0446 (7)0.0301 (6)0.0018 (6)0.0129 (6)0.0064 (5)
O190.0420 (7)0.0467 (8)0.0516 (8)0.0171 (6)0.0079 (6)0.0026 (6)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
S1—O81.4243 (11)O10—C111.4094 (18)
S1—O91.4262 (12)C11—C121.381 (2)
S1—O101.6057 (12)C11—C161.384 (2)
S1—C21.7503 (15)C12—C131.382 (2)
C2—C71.392 (2)C12—H120.920 (19)
C2—C31.395 (2)C13—C141.384 (2)
C3—C41.382 (2)C13—H130.962 (18)
C3—H30.967 (19)C14—C151.382 (2)
C4—C51.389 (2)C14—N171.469 (2)
C4—H40.991 (19)C15—C161.384 (2)
C5—C61.383 (2)C15—H150.927 (19)
C5—H50.976 (19)C16—H160.954 (19)
C6—C71.388 (2)N17—O181.2198 (18)
C6—H60.91 (2)N17—O191.2236 (19)
C7—H70.971 (19)
O8—S1—O9120.42 (7)C2—C7—H7119.9 (11)
O8—S1—O10108.79 (7)C11—O10—S1118.90 (9)
O9—S1—O10102.56 (7)C12—C11—C16122.72 (14)
O8—S1—C2109.42 (7)C12—C11—O10118.79 (13)
O9—S1—C2110.41 (7)C16—C11—O10118.39 (13)
O10—S1—C2103.76 (6)C11—C12—C13118.84 (14)
C7—C2—C3121.77 (14)C11—C12—H12120.1 (11)
C7—C2—S1119.19 (11)C13—C12—H12121.0 (11)
C3—C2—S1119.02 (12)C12—C13—C14118.35 (14)
C4—C3—C2118.55 (14)C12—C13—H13120.1 (11)
C4—C3—H3122.1 (11)C14—C13—H13121.6 (11)
C2—C3—H3119.4 (11)C15—C14—C13122.99 (14)
C3—C4—C5120.34 (15)C15—C14—N17118.77 (14)
C3—C4—H4118.8 (11)C13—C14—N17118.24 (13)
C5—C4—H4120.9 (11)C14—C15—C16118.50 (14)
C6—C5—C4120.51 (15)C14—C15—H15120.4 (11)
C6—C5—H5119.3 (11)C16—C15—H15121.1 (11)
C4—C5—H5120.2 (11)C11—C16—C15118.58 (14)
C5—C6—C7120.28 (15)C11—C16—H16119.6 (12)
C5—C6—H6122.0 (12)C15—C16—H16121.8 (12)
C7—C6—H6117.6 (12)O18—N17—O19123.79 (14)
C6—C7—C2118.55 (14)O18—N17—C14117.88 (14)
C6—C7—H7121.5 (11)O19—N17—C14118.33 (13)
O8—S1—C2—C713.37 (14)S1—O10—C11—C1279.98 (15)
O9—S1—C2—C7148.12 (12)S1—O10—C11—C16103.52 (14)
O10—S1—C2—C7102.61 (12)C16—C11—C12—C131.5 (2)
O8—S1—C2—C3165.46 (11)O10—C11—C12—C13174.88 (13)
O9—S1—C2—C330.71 (14)C11—C12—C13—C140.5 (2)
O10—S1—C2—C378.56 (12)C12—C13—C14—C150.8 (2)
C7—C2—C3—C40.6 (2)C12—C13—C14—N17179.67 (13)
S1—C2—C3—C4178.25 (11)C13—C14—C15—C161.2 (2)
C2—C3—C4—C50.1 (2)N17—C14—C15—C16179.26 (13)
C3—C4—C5—C60.3 (2)C12—C11—C16—C151.0 (2)
C4—C5—C6—C70.2 (2)O10—C11—C16—C15175.31 (13)
C5—C6—C7—C20.2 (2)C14—C15—C16—C110.3 (2)
C3—C2—C7—C60.6 (2)C15—C14—N17—O18168.62 (14)
S1—C2—C7—C6178.16 (11)C13—C14—N17—O1811.8 (2)
O8—S1—O10—C1141.26 (12)C15—C14—N17—O1910.9 (2)
O9—S1—O10—C11169.86 (10)C13—C14—N17—O19168.63 (14)
C2—S1—O10—C1175.15 (11)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C7—H7···O80.971 (19)2.533 (19)2.921 (2)103.8 (13)
C7—H7···O9i0.971 (19)2.567 (19)3.479 (2)156.5 (15)
C12—H12···O9ii0.920 (19)2.442 (19)3.188 (2)138.2 (14)
Symmetry codes: (i) x+2, y1/2, z+1/2; (ii) x, y+3/2, z+1/2.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC12H9NO5S
Mr279.26
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/c
Temperature (K)120
a, b, c (Å)10.015 (3), 10.852 (4), 11.396 (4)
β (°) 101.651 (8)
V3)1213.0 (7)
Z4
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)0.28
Crystal size (mm)0.30 × 0.24 × 0.20
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker SMART CCD 1K area-detector
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 1998)
Tmin, Tmax0.799, 1.000
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
23602, 3437, 2586
Rint0.036
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.710
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.035, 0.093, 1.04
No. of reflections3437
No. of parameters208
H-atom treatmentAll H-atom parameters refined
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.36, 0.38

Computer programs: SMART (Bruker, 1998), SAINT (Bruker, 2003), SAINT, SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997) and PLATON (Spek, 2003), SHELXL97.

Selected torsion angles (º) top
O8—S1—O10—C1141.26 (12)C2—S1—O10—C1175.15 (11)
O9—S1—O10—C11169.86 (10)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C7—H7···O9i0.971 (19)2.567 (19)3.479 (2)156.5 (15)
C12—H12···O9ii0.920 (19)2.442 (19)3.188 (2)138.2 (14)
Symmetry codes: (i) x+2, y1/2, z+1/2; (ii) x, y+3/2, z+1/2.
 

Subscribe to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications

The full text of this article is available to subscribers to the journal.

If you have already registered and are using a computer listed in your registration details, please email support@iucr.org for assistance.

Buy online

You may purchase this article in PDF and/or HTML formats. For purchasers in the European Community who do not have a VAT number, VAT will be added at the local rate. Payments to the IUCr are handled by WorldPay, who will accept payment by credit card in several currencies. To purchase the article, please complete the form below (fields marked * are required), and then click on `Continue'.
E-mail address* 
Repeat e-mail address* 
(for error checking) 

Format*   PDF (US $40)
   HTML (US $40)
   PDF+HTML (US $50)
In order for VAT to be shown for your country javascript needs to be enabled.

VAT number 
(non-UK EC countries only) 
Country* 
 

Terms and conditions of use
Contact us

Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds