Supporting information
Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270199010173/ta1254sup1.cif | |
Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270199010173/ta1254Isup2.hkl |
CCDC reference: 140933
To an aqueous solution (20 ml) containing K3[Fe(CN)]6 (0.281 g, 1.0 mmol) was added CuCl2.2H2O (0.256 g, 1.5 mmol) with stirring at room temperature, followed by the addition of en (0.180 g, 3.0 mmol). After stirring for 10 min, the resulting dark solution was evaporated at room temperature for a week, giving crystalline plates of the title complex in 60% yield. Analysis calculated for C10H16CuFeKN10: C 27.6, H 3.7, N 32.2%; found: C 27.7, H 3.7, N 32.3%.
The H atoms were located in difference maps, though they were later fixed in idealized geometries and allowed to ride. The C1 and C2 atoms are disordered over two positions and were refined with half occupancies.
Data collection: XSCANS (Siemens, 1996); cell refinement: XSCANS; data reduction: XSCANS; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1990); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997a); molecular graphics: SHELXTL/PC (Sheldrick, 1997b); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL/PC.
K[Cu(C2H8N2)2][FeC6N6] | F(000) = 880 |
Mr = 434.82 | Dx = 1.733 Mg m−3 |
Monoclinic, C2/c | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
a = 8.428 (1) Å | Cell parameters from 31 reflections |
b = 16.863 (1) Å | θ = 3.0–16.5° |
c = 11.869 (1) Å | µ = 2.41 mm−1 |
β = 98.86 (1)° | T = 295 K |
V = 1666.7 (3) Å3 | Rectangular, black |
Z = 4 | 0.40 × 0.32 × 0.30 mm |
Siemens P4 diffractometer | 1856 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | Rint = 0.013 |
Graphite monochromator | θmax = 29°, θmin = 3.0° |
ω scans | h = −1→11 |
Absorption correction: ψ scan (North et al., 1968) | k = −1→22 |
Tmin = 0.813, Tmax = 0.921 | l = −16→15 |
2601 measured reflections | 3 standard reflections every 97 reflections |
2206 independent reflections | intensity decay: 2.7% |
Refinement on F2 | Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods |
Least-squares matrix: full | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.027 | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
wR(F2) = 0.068 | H-atom parameters constrained |
S = 0.97 | Calculated w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0423P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
2206 reflections | (Δ/σ)max = 0.001 |
107 parameters | Δρmax = 0.46 e Å−3 |
4 restraints | Δρmin = −0.55 e Å−3 |
K[Cu(C2H8N2)2][FeC6N6] | V = 1666.7 (3) Å3 |
Mr = 434.82 | Z = 4 |
Monoclinic, C2/c | Mo Kα radiation |
a = 8.428 (1) Å | µ = 2.41 mm−1 |
b = 16.863 (1) Å | T = 295 K |
c = 11.869 (1) Å | 0.40 × 0.32 × 0.30 mm |
β = 98.86 (1)° |
Siemens P4 diffractometer | 1856 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Absorption correction: ψ scan (North et al., 1968) | Rint = 0.013 |
Tmin = 0.813, Tmax = 0.921 | 3 standard reflections every 97 reflections |
2601 measured reflections | intensity decay: 2.7% |
2206 independent reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.027 | 4 restraints |
wR(F2) = 0.068 | H-atom parameters constrained |
S = 0.97 | Δρmax = 0.46 e Å−3 |
2206 reflections | Δρmin = −0.55 e Å−3 |
107 parameters |
Experimental. The scan speed was variable in the range 4–60° min−1 in ω. Background measurement used a stationary crystal and stationary counter at the beginning and end of the scan, each for 25% of the total scan time. |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | Occ. (<1) | |
Fe | 0 | 0.384388 (19) | 0.25 | 0.01833 (10) | |
Cu | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0 | 0.03694 (12) | |
K | 0 | 0.35976 (3) | −0.25 | 0.02618 (13) | |
N1 | 0.6159 (2) | 0.41481 (11) | −0.07077 (15) | 0.0383 (4) | |
H1A | 0.5860 | 0.4151 | −0.1469 | 0.046* | |
H1B | 0.7224 | 0.4233 | −0.0557 | 0.046* | |
N2 | 0.3797 (2) | 0.41230 (11) | 0.05942 (18) | 0.0482 (5) | |
H2A | 0.4139 | 0.4058 | 0.1345 | 0.058* | |
H2B | 0.2743 | 0.4240 | 0.0496 | 0.058* | |
C1 | 0.5767 (8) | 0.3370 (4) | −0.0236 (6) | 0.0448 (17) | 0.50 |
H1C | 0.6478 | 0.3269 | 0.0473 | 0.054* | 0.50 |
H1D | 0.5913 | 0.2951 | −0.0769 | 0.054* | 0.50 |
C2 | 0.4058 (7) | 0.3381 (3) | −0.0025 (5) | 0.0424 (13) | 0.50 |
H2C | 0.3334 | 0.3361 | −0.0744 | 0.051* | 0.50 |
H2D | 0.3849 | 0.2924 | 0.0426 | 0.051* | 0.50 |
C1' | 0.5356 (11) | 0.3386 (4) | −0.0632 (6) | 0.060 (3) | 0.50 |
H1'1 | 0.6140 | 0.2961 | −0.0572 | 0.072* | 0.50 |
H1'2 | 0.4584 | 0.3300 | −0.1316 | 0.072* | 0.50 |
C2' | 0.45228 (9) | 0.33810 (4) | 0.03847 (6) | 0.060 (2) | 0.50 |
H2'1 | 0.3699 | 0.2975 | 0.0283 | 0.072* | 0.50 |
H2'2 | 0.5291 | 0.3240 | 0.1050 | 0.072* | 0.50 |
N3 | 0.26267 (9) | 0.25630 (4) | 0.25372 (6) | 0.0498 (5) | |
N4 | −0.00596 (9) | 0.38299 (4) | −0.01138 (6) | 0.0389 (4) | |
N5 | 0.27505 (9) | 0.50785 (4) | 0.29361 (6) | 0.0394 (4) | |
C3 | 0.16565 (9) | 0.30319 (4) | 0.25536 (6) | 0.0287 (4) | |
C4 | −0.00501 (9) | 0.38372 (4) | 0.08530 (6) | 0.0253 (4) | |
C5 | 0.17078 (9) | 0.46323 (4) | 0.27407 (6) | 0.0244 (4) |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
Fe | 0.01747 (18) | 0.02081 (17) | 0.01704 (17) | 0.000 | 0.00366 (12) | 0.000 |
Cu | 0.0302 (2) | 0.0345 (2) | 0.0516 (2) | −0.00179 (14) | 0.02375 (17) | −0.00465 (15) |
K | 0.0278 (3) | 0.0280 (3) | 0.0234 (3) | 0.000 | 0.0059 (2) | 0.000 |
N1 | 0.0316 (9) | 0.0482 (10) | 0.0372 (9) | 0.0079 (8) | 0.0121 (7) | 0.0007 (8) |
N2 | 0.0443 (11) | 0.0513 (12) | 0.0546 (12) | −0.0135 (9) | 0.0251 (9) | −0.0101 (9) |
C1 | 0.057 (4) | 0.039 (3) | 0.039 (4) | 0.004 (3) | 0.006 (3) | −0.007 (3) |
C2 | 0.044 (3) | 0.035 (3) | 0.048 (3) | −0.008 (2) | 0.004 (3) | −0.007 (2) |
C1' | 0.078 (6) | 0.046 (4) | 0.061 (5) | −0.017 (4) | 0.028 (4) | −0.030 (4) |
C2' | 0.063 (5) | 0.048 (3) | 0.073 (5) | 0.012 (3) | 0.021 (4) | 0.026 (3) |
N3 | 0.0509 (13) | 0.0523 (12) | 0.0458 (12) | 0.0251 (11) | 0.0067 (10) | −0.0013 (10) |
N4 | 0.0381 (11) | 0.0557 (12) | 0.0234 (9) | −0.0018 (8) | 0.0057 (7) | −0.0013 (7) |
N5 | 0.0347 (10) | 0.0397 (10) | 0.0446 (11) | −0.0113 (8) | 0.0085 (8) | −0.0067 (8) |
C3 | 0.0296 (10) | 0.0319 (9) | 0.0248 (9) | 0.0048 (8) | 0.0044 (8) | −0.0002 (7) |
C4 | 0.0190 (8) | 0.0310 (9) | 0.0261 (9) | −0.0015 (7) | 0.0040 (7) | 0.0002 (7) |
C5 | 0.0244 (9) | 0.0263 (8) | 0.0231 (8) | 0.0008 (7) | 0.0059 (7) | −0.0002 (6) |
Fe—C3i | 1.9450 (17) | K—N5vii | 3.2002 (18) |
Fe—C3 | 1.9450 (17) | K—C5vi | 3.3054 (17) |
Fe—C5 | 1.9482 (17) | K—C5vii | 3.3054 (17) |
Fe—C5i | 1.9482 (16) | N1—C1' | 1.461 (6) |
Fe—C4 | 1.9485 (16) | N1—C1 | 1.481 (6) |
Fe—C4i | 1.9485 (16) | N2—C2 | 1.450 (5) |
Cu—N2 | 1.9905 (17) | N2—C2' | 1.478 (3) |
Cu—N2ii | 1.9905 (17) | C1—C2 | 1.487 (7) |
Cu—N1 | 1.9943 (15) | C1'—C2' | 1.477 (7) |
Cu—N1ii | 1.9943 (16) | N3—C3 | 1.140 (2) |
K—N3iii | 2.8076 (16) | N3—Kiv | 2.8076 (16) |
K—N3iv | 2.8076 (16) | N4—C4 | 1.147 (2) |
K—N4 | 2.8678 (14) | N5—C5 | 1.154 (2) |
K—N4v | 2.8678 (14) | N5—Kvii | 3.2002 (18) |
K—N5vi | 3.2002 (18) | C5—Kvii | 3.3054 (17) |
C3i—Fe—C3 | 90.93 (11) | N4v—K—N5vii | 82.34 (5) |
C3i—Fe—C5 | 173.45 (6) | N5vi—K—N5vii | 91.66 (6) |
C3—Fe—C5 | 87.99 (7) | N3iii—K—C5vi | 158.57 (5) |
C3i—Fe—C5i | 87.99 (7) | N3iv—K—C5vi | 109.27 (5) |
C3—Fe—C5i | 173.45 (6) | N4—K—C5vi | 82.17 (5) |
C5—Fe—C5i | 93.80 (10) | N4v—K—C5vi | 83.55 (5) |
C3i—Fe—C4 | 93.35 (7) | N5vi—K—C5vi | 20.36 (4) |
C3—Fe—C4 | 86.28 (7) | N5vii—K—C5vi | 71.32 (4) |
C5—Fe—C4 | 93.03 (7) | N3iii—K—C5vii | 109.27 (5) |
C5i—Fe—C4 | 87.33 (7) | N3iv—K—C5vii | 158.57 (5) |
C3i—Fe—C4i | 86.28 (7) | N4—K—C5vii | 83.55 (5) |
C3—Fe—C4i | 93.35 (7) | N4v—K—C5vii | 82.17 (5) |
C5—Fe—C4i | 87.33 (7) | N5vi—K—C5vii | 71.32 (4) |
C5i—Fe—C4i | 93.03 (7) | N5vii—K—C5vii | 20.36 (4) |
C4—Fe—C4i | 179.48 (10) | C5vi—K—C5vii | 50.98 (6) |
N2—Cu—N2ii | 180.0 | C1'—N1—C1 | 20.8 (4) |
N2—Cu—N1 | 84.97 (8) | C1'—N1—Cu | 110.6 (4) |
N2ii—Cu—N1 | 95.03 (8) | C1—N1—Cu | 108.9 (3) |
N2—Cu—N1ii | 95.03 (8) | C2—N2—C2' | 22.2 (3) |
N2ii—Cu—N1ii | 84.97 (8) | C2—N2—Cu | 108.8 (3) |
N1—Cu—N1ii | 180.0 | C2'—N2—Cu | 111.3 (3) |
N3iii—K—N3iv | 91.39 (8) | N1—C1—C2 | 108.3 (5) |
N3iii—K—N4 | 87.65 (5) | N2—C2—C1 | 109.3 (5) |
N3iv—K—N4 | 103.50 (5) | N1—C1'—C2' | 112.4 (6) |
N3iii—K—N4v | 103.50 (5) | C1'—C2'—N2 | 111.0 (6) |
N3iv—K—N4v | 87.65 (5) | C3—N3—Kiv | 179.67 (17) |
N4—K—N4v | 164.17 (8) | C4—N4—K | 172.55 (16) |
N3iii—K—N5vi | 169.85 (5) | C5—N5—Kvii | 84.97 (13) |
N3iv—K—N5vi | 89.37 (5) | N3—C3—Fe | 177.14 (16) |
N4—K—N5vi | 82.34 (5) | N4—C4—Fe | 179.02 (15) |
N4v—K—N5vi | 86.65 (5) | N5—C5—Fe | 176.39 (16) |
N3iii—K—N5vii | 89.37 (5) | N5—C5—Kvii | 74.68 (12) |
N3iv—K—N5vii | 169.85 (5) | Fe—C5—Kvii | 107.61 (6) |
N4—K—N5vii | 86.65 (5) | ||
N2—Cu—N1—C1' | 10.9 (4) | N5vii—K—N4—C4 | 144.8 (10) |
N2ii—Cu—N1—C1' | −169.1 (4) | C5vi—K—N4—C4 | −143.6 (10) |
N1ii—Cu—N1—C1' | 68 (100) | C5vii—K—N4—C4 | 165.0 (10) |
N2—Cu—N1—C1 | −11.2 (3) | Kiv—N3—C3—Fe | −104 (23) |
N2ii—Cu—N1—C1 | 168.8 (3) | C3i—Fe—C3—N3 | 100 (4) |
N1ii—Cu—N1—C1 | 46 (100) | C5—Fe—C3—N3 | −86 (4) |
N2ii—Cu—N2—C2 | −162 (100) | C5i—Fe—C3—N3 | 20 (4) |
N1—Cu—N2—C2 | −15.4 (3) | C4—Fe—C3—N3 | 7 (4) |
N1ii—Cu—N2—C2 | 164.6 (3) | C4i—Fe—C3—N3 | −174 (4) |
N2ii—Cu—N2—C2' | −138 (100) | K—N4—C4—Fe | 59 (9) |
N1—Cu—N2—C2' | 8.0 (3) | C3i—Fe—C4—N4 | −115 (9) |
N1ii—Cu—N2—C2' | −172.0 (3) | C3—Fe—C4—N4 | −25 (9) |
C1'—N1—C1—C2 | −63.4 (16) | C5—Fe—C4—N4 | 63 (9) |
Cu—N1—C1—C2 | 35.0 (5) | C5i—Fe—C4—N4 | 157 (9) |
C2'—N2—C2—C1 | −61.3 (13) | C4i—Fe—C4—N4 | −70 (9) |
Cu—N2—C2—C1 | 39.1 (5) | Kvii—N5—C5—Fe | −130 (2) |
N1—C1—C2—N2 | −49.2 (6) | C3i—Fe—C5—N5 | 23 (3) |
C1—N1—C1'—C2' | 61.1 (14) | C3—Fe—C5—N5 | −57 (2) |
Cu—N1—C1'—C2' | −28.0 (8) | C5i—Fe—C5—N5 | 129 (2) |
N1—C1'—C2'—N2 | 35.0 (10) | C4—Fe—C5—N5 | −144 (2) |
C2—N2—C2'—C1' | 62.5 (12) | C4i—Fe—C5—N5 | 36 (2) |
Cu—N2—C2'—C1' | −25.3 (8) | C3i—Fe—C5—Kvii | −105.7 (6) |
N3iii—K—N4—C4 | 55.3 (10) | C3—Fe—C5—Kvii | 173.69 (6) |
N3iv—K—N4—C4 | −35.5 (11) | C5i—Fe—C5—Kvii | 0.0 |
N4v—K—N4—C4 | −169.3 (10) | C4—Fe—C5—Kvii | 87.52 (6) |
N5vi—K—N4—C4 | −123.0 (10) | C4i—Fe—C5—Kvii | −92.86 (6) |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x, y, −z+1/2; (ii) −x+1, −y+1, −z; (iii) x−1/2, −y+1/2, z−1/2; (iv) −x+1/2, −y+1/2, −z; (v) −x, y, −z−1/2; (vi) x, −y+1, z−1/2; (vii) −x, −y+1, −z. |
Experimental details
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | K[Cu(C2H8N2)2][FeC6N6] |
Mr | 434.82 |
Crystal system, space group | Monoclinic, C2/c |
Temperature (K) | 295 |
a, b, c (Å) | 8.428 (1), 16.863 (1), 11.869 (1) |
β (°) | 98.86 (1) |
V (Å3) | 1666.7 (3) |
Z | 4 |
Radiation type | Mo Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 2.41 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.40 × 0.32 × 0.30 |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Siemens P4 diffractometer |
Absorption correction | ψ scan (North et al., 1968) |
Tmin, Tmax | 0.813, 0.921 |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections | 2601, 2206, 1856 |
Rint | 0.013 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.682 |
Refinement | |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.027, 0.068, 0.97 |
No. of reflections | 2206 |
No. of parameters | 107 |
No. of restraints | 4 |
H-atom treatment | H-atom parameters constrained |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 0.46, −0.55 |
Computer programs: XSCANS (Siemens, 1996), XSCANS, SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1990), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997a), SHELXTL/PC (Sheldrick, 1997b), SHELXTL/PC.
Subscribe to Acta Crystallographica Section C: Structural Chemistry
The full text of this article is available to subscribers to the journal.
- Information on subscribing
- Sample issue
- Purchase subscription
- Reduced-price subscriptions
- If you have already subscribed, you may need to register
The crystal engineering of two- and three-dimensional polymers is of current interest not only from the theoretical aspect related to the topologies of novel networks with inner cavities and channels (Hoskins & Robson, 1990; Carlucci et al., 1995; Yaghi & Li, 1995; Black et al., 1996), but also because of the potential applications of such complexes in catalysis (Fujita et al., 1994), host–guest chemistry (Yaghi et al., 1997) and molecular electronics (Fallah et al., 1996; Miyasaka et al., 1996). One of the most successful strategies leading to extended heterometallic supramolecular architecture is the use of metal cations such as Cu2+ or its coordinated ions to link relatively stable coordination anions such as [Fe(CN)6]3− containing potential bridging units (the cyanide groups). Such synthetic strategy has provided many complexes in the literature with extended networks possessing interesting photochemical, electrochemical and magnetic properties.
Cyanide is an ambidentate ligand capable of simultaneously bridging two metal centers in an asymmetric mode. Although the extended structure of Prussian blue with cyanide C-bonded to low-spin FeII and N-bonded to high-spin FeIII has been known for a long time (Buser et al., 1977), the cyano-bridged polymeric materials have not received much attention until recently. Prussian blue analogues (Miyasaka et al., 1995; Ohba et al., 1994, 1995; Mallah et al., 1995) derived from the assembly of the anionic block [M(CN)6]3− (M = Cr, Fe, Mn etc.) and the cationic fragment (M'Lm)n+ (M' = Cu, Ni, Co, Fe etc.; L is a neutral terminal-N-containing ligand; m,n = 1, 2 or 3) having one to four unsaturated coordination sites, are potential molecular-based magnets, some of which are magnetically ordered at high temperature.
Due to the aforementioned interest, we have reacted [Cu(en)2]2+ with [Fe(CN)6]3− (en is ethylenediamine). However, with a CuCl2:FeIII molar ratio of 1.5:1, in the presence of en, an ionic complex with discrete cations and anions was formed, instead of polymeric coordination complexes with extended networks such as formed with various ratios of CuBr2:FeIII (Zhang, 1999). It is possible that the larger Br− ion assisted in the network formation. This ionic title complex, (I), contains [Cu(en)2]2+ cations and [Fe(CN)6]3− anions with one K+ ion to balance the ionic charge and also template the crystal lattice (Fig. 1). The [Cu(en)2]2+ cation is planar, with Cu2+ chelated by two en ligands with an average Cu—N distance of 1.992 (2) Å and an N—Cu—N bite angle of 84.97 (8)°. The [Fe(CN)6]3− anion is a slightly distorted octahedron with all Fe—C distances nearly equivalent [average 1.947 (2) Å]. However, only one of the trans-C—Fe—C angles is close to 180° [C4—Fe—C4(-x, y 1/2 − z) 179.48 (10)°], while the other two deviate by 6.55 (6)° from linearity (Fig. 2). \sch
Each Fe center in the anions is C-bonded to six cyanide ions, which are weakly bound to five different K+ ions at the N-ends [average K···N 2.84 (3) Å]. The K···N—C—Fe pathways are of two kinds, one is quasi-linear with an average K···N—C angle of 176.1° (Morpurgo et al., 1980, 1981), while the other is non-linear with an average K···N—C angle of 85.2° (Ibrahim et al., 1998). The [Cu(en)2]2+ cations are thus located diagonally within the loose cubic cavities formed by six [Fe(CN)6]3− anions through weak N···K interactions, with a Cu···N(1 − x, y, 1/2 − z) distance of 2.8604 (8) Å.