Buy article online - an online subscription or single-article purchase is required to access this article.
The crystal structure of 7-nitro-1
H-indazole, C
7H
5N
3O
2, an inhibitor of nitric oxide synthase, shows the existence of an intramolecular hydrogen bond between an O atom of the nitro group and the NH group of the indazole ring. The crystal packing consists of intermolecular hydrogen bonding and indazole
indazole interactions.
Supporting information
CCDC reference: 156182
Compound (I) was synthesized according to the procedure of Bartsch & Yang (1984). The compound is poorly soluble. Suitable crystals were obtained by slow evaporation from methanol at room temperature. The diameter of the collimator used for the data collection was 1.3 mm.
Data collection: CAD-4-PC Software (Enraf-Nonius, 1992); cell refinement: CAD-4-PC Software; data reduction: JANA98 (Petříček & Dušek, 1998); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1990); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.
Crystal data top
C7H5N3O2 | Dx = 1.560 Mg m−3 |
Mr = 163.14 | Melting point: 456 K |
Monoclinic, P21/n | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
a = 5.0186 (5) Å | Cell parameters from 25 reflections |
b = 9.6408 (9) Å | θ = 18–25° |
c = 14.5082 (14) Å | µ = 0.12 mm−1 |
β = 98.21 (1)° | T = 293 K |
V = 694.76 (12) Å3 | Prism, dark yellow |
Z = 4 | 1.0 × 0.4 × 0.1 mm |
F(000) = 336 | |
Data collection top
Enraf-Nonius CAD4 diffractometer | Rint = 0.019 |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | θmax = 30.0°, θmin = 2.5° |
Graphite monochromator | h = −7→6 |
θ/2θ scans | k = 0→13 |
2088 measured reflections | l = 0→20 |
2022 independent reflections | 3 standard reflections every 60 min |
1625 reflections with I > 2σ(I) | intensity decay: 1.8% |
Refinement top
Refinement on F2 | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
Least-squares matrix: full | Hydrogen site location: difference Fourier map |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.046 | All H-atom parameters refined |
wR(F2) = 0.135 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0757P)2 + 0.1137P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
S = 1.06 | (Δ/σ)max = 0.003 |
2022 reflections | Δρmax = 0.38 e Å−3 |
129 parameters | Δρmin = −0.16 e Å−3 |
0 restraints | Extinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997) |
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods | Extinction coefficient: none |
Crystal data top
C7H5N3O2 | V = 694.76 (12) Å3 |
Mr = 163.14 | Z = 4 |
Monoclinic, P21/n | Mo Kα radiation |
a = 5.0186 (5) Å | µ = 0.12 mm−1 |
b = 9.6408 (9) Å | T = 293 K |
c = 14.5082 (14) Å | 1.0 × 0.4 × 0.1 mm |
β = 98.21 (1)° | |
Data collection top
Enraf-Nonius CAD4 diffractometer | Rint = 0.019 |
2088 measured reflections | 3 standard reflections every 60 min |
2022 independent reflections | intensity decay: 1.8% |
1625 reflections with I > 2σ(I) | |
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.046 | 0 restraints |
wR(F2) = 0.135 | All H-atom parameters refined |
S = 1.06 | Δρmax = 0.38 e Å−3 |
2022 reflections | Δρmin = −0.16 e Å−3 |
129 parameters | |
Special details top
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top | x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | |
C1 | −0.0843 (2) | 0.83074 (11) | 0.92647 (8) | 0.0348 (2) | |
N2 | −0.2670 (2) | 0.90809 (11) | 0.96328 (8) | 0.0414 (3) | |
H2 | −0.322 (4) | 0.9023 (19) | 1.0197 (13) | 0.061 (5)* | |
N3 | −0.3765 (2) | 1.00794 (12) | 0.90277 (9) | 0.0478 (3) | |
C4 | −0.2637 (3) | 0.99367 (14) | 0.82698 (10) | 0.0466 (3) | |
H4 | −0.318 (3) | 1.0536 (18) | 0.7718 (12) | 0.056 (4)* | |
C5 | −0.0748 (2) | 0.88331 (13) | 0.83618 (8) | 0.0385 (3) | |
C6 | 0.1000 (2) | 0.82518 (14) | 0.77983 (9) | 0.0435 (3) | |
H6 | 0.102 (3) | 0.8626 (18) | 0.7197 (12) | 0.056 (4)* | |
C7 | 0.2618 (3) | 0.71625 (15) | 0.81404 (9) | 0.0464 (3) | |
H7 | 0.387 (3) | 0.6743 (17) | 0.7755 (11) | 0.055 (4)* | |
C8 | 0.2546 (3) | 0.66365 (14) | 0.90299 (10) | 0.0437 (3) | |
H8 | 0.369 (4) | 0.5920 (19) | 0.9230 (12) | 0.058 (5)* | |
C9 | 0.0825 (2) | 0.71975 (12) | 0.95931 (8) | 0.0374 (3) | |
N10 | 0.0737 (2) | 0.66393 (12) | 1.05110 (8) | 0.0465 (3) | |
O11 | −0.0915 (3) | 0.71310 (13) | 1.09620 (8) | 0.0669 (3) | |
O12 | 0.2288 (2) | 0.56971 (13) | 1.08004 (8) | 0.0642 (3) | |
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top | U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 |
C1 | 0.0280 (5) | 0.0384 (5) | 0.0402 (5) | −0.0036 (4) | 0.0120 (4) | −0.0077 (4) |
N2 | 0.0348 (5) | 0.0456 (6) | 0.0470 (6) | 0.0014 (4) | 0.0168 (4) | −0.0071 (4) |
N3 | 0.0381 (5) | 0.0478 (6) | 0.0594 (7) | 0.0060 (4) | 0.0137 (5) | −0.0041 (5) |
C4 | 0.0394 (6) | 0.0490 (7) | 0.0526 (7) | 0.0042 (5) | 0.0102 (5) | 0.0020 (6) |
C5 | 0.0323 (5) | 0.0434 (6) | 0.0415 (6) | −0.0017 (4) | 0.0110 (4) | −0.0031 (5) |
C6 | 0.0410 (6) | 0.0535 (7) | 0.0391 (6) | −0.0035 (5) | 0.0158 (5) | −0.0044 (5) |
C7 | 0.0396 (6) | 0.0534 (7) | 0.0500 (7) | 0.0006 (5) | 0.0196 (5) | −0.0116 (5) |
C8 | 0.0370 (6) | 0.0436 (6) | 0.0519 (7) | 0.0048 (5) | 0.0111 (5) | −0.0063 (5) |
C9 | 0.0344 (5) | 0.0396 (6) | 0.0394 (5) | −0.0035 (4) | 0.0095 (4) | −0.0034 (4) |
N10 | 0.0497 (6) | 0.0476 (6) | 0.0433 (6) | −0.0042 (5) | 0.0099 (4) | −0.0003 (4) |
O11 | 0.0808 (8) | 0.0740 (8) | 0.0534 (6) | 0.0060 (6) | 0.0352 (5) | 0.0057 (5) |
O12 | 0.0690 (7) | 0.0639 (7) | 0.0574 (6) | 0.0091 (5) | 0.0011 (5) | 0.0112 (5) |
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
C1—N2 | 1.3499 (13) | C6—C7 | 1.376 (2) |
C1—C9 | 1.3994 (16) | C7—C8 | 1.392 (2) |
C1—C5 | 1.4118 (16) | C8—C9 | 1.3815 (16) |
N2—N3 | 1.3643 (16) | C9—N10 | 1.4427 (16) |
N3—C4 | 1.3138 (17) | N10—O11 | 1.2229 (15) |
C4—C5 | 1.4187 (18) | N10—O12 | 1.2306 (16) |
C5—C6 | 1.3989 (15) | | |
| | | |
N2—C1—C9 | 134.01 (11) | C7—C6—C5 | 118.81 (11) |
N2—C1—C5 | 106.47 (10) | C6—C7—C8 | 121.36 (11) |
C9—C1—C5 | 119.52 (10) | C9—C8—C7 | 120.47 (12) |
C1—N2—N3 | 111.67 (10) | C8—C9—C1 | 119.47 (11) |
C4—N3—N2 | 106.42 (10) | C8—C9—N10 | 120.26 (12) |
N3—C4—C5 | 111.21 (12) | C1—C9—N10 | 120.26 (10) |
C6—C5—C1 | 120.36 (11) | O11—N10—O12 | 123.22 (12) |
C6—C5—C4 | 135.40 (12) | O11—N10—C9 | 117.49 (12) |
C1—C5—C4 | 104.23 (10) | O12—N10—C9 | 119.29 (11) |
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
N2—H2···N3i | 0.902 (18) | 2.190 (18) | 2.9369 (14) | 139.8 (16) |
N2—H2···O11 | 0.902 (18) | 2.351 (19) | 2.7465 (16) | 106.5 (13) |
Symmetry code: (i) −x−1, −y+2, −z+2. |
Experimental details
Crystal data |
Chemical formula | C7H5N3O2 |
Mr | 163.14 |
Crystal system, space group | Monoclinic, P21/n |
Temperature (K) | 293 |
a, b, c (Å) | 5.0186 (5), 9.6408 (9), 14.5082 (14) |
β (°) | 98.21 (1) |
V (Å3) | 694.76 (12) |
Z | 4 |
Radiation type | Mo Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 0.12 |
Crystal size (mm) | 1.0 × 0.4 × 0.1 |
|
Data collection |
Diffractometer | Enraf-Nonius CAD4 diffractometer |
Absorption correction | – |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections | 2088, 2022, 1625 |
Rint | 0.019 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.703 |
|
Refinement |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.046, 0.135, 1.06 |
No. of reflections | 2022 |
No. of parameters | 129 |
H-atom treatment | All H-atom parameters refined |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 0.38, −0.16 |
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
N2—H2···N3i | 0.902 (18) | 2.190 (18) | 2.9369 (14) | 139.8 (16) |
N2—H2···O11 | 0.902 (18) | 2.351 (19) | 2.7465 (16) | 106.5 (13) |
Symmetry code: (i) −x−1, −y+2, −z+2. |
Subscribe to Acta Crystallographica Section C: Structural Chemistry
The full text of this article is available to subscribers to the journal.
If you have already registered and are using a computer listed in your registration details, please email
support@iucr.org for assistance.
Nitric oxide (NO) formation by the enzyme nitric oxide synthase (NOS) has been implicated in many neuronal processes, such as regulation of local cerebral blood flow, long-term potentiation, nociception and NMDA receptor-mediated excitotoxicity (Iadecola, 1993; Meller & Gebhart, 1993; Chabrier et al., 1999). The enzyme nitric oxide synthase occurs in three isoforms, an inductible form (iNOS) and two constitutive forms, neuronal (nNOS) and endothelial (eNOS) (Hemmens & Mayer, 1998). All three isoforms catalyse the formation of nitric oxide from L-arginine, O2 and NADPH, with the production of citrulline, nitric oxide and NADP+ (Marletta, 1994). In view of the potential role of NO in various neurological processes, selective inhibitors of nNOS have been used as experimental tools to examine the effect of NO in these systems. Among these compounds, 7-nitro-1H-indazole, (I), has been identified as a potential selective inhibitor of the neuronal NOS activity and is now considered as a very important tool in pharmacological studies. \sch
The affinity of (I) is about 0.9µM for nNOS, about 0.7µM for eNOS and 57µM for iNOS (Moore, Babbedge et al., 1993; Babbedge et al., 1993). However, the precise molecular mechanism of the inhibitory action of (I) remains very unclear. It probably binds to the prosthetic heme moiety, competing with the substrate L-arginine (Moore, Wallace et al., 1993). Therefore, it is most likely that (I) will be bound in the L-arginine binding site, which was identified in the X-ray structure of the complex of iNOS with the L-arginine substrate (Crane et al., 1998). From this structure the important role of Glu 371, close to the heme group, was identified.
In the crystal structure of (I), the O atoms of the nitro group are coplanar with the indazole ring, the angle between the planes of the ring and the nitro group being 3.6 (2)°. This result was expected, but a search of the structures deposited in the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD; release? ref?) indicated that the nitro group attached to the phenyl ring can deviate somewhat from this coplanar arrangement (by as much as 70°; Zinner et al., 1994). Thus one O atom of the nitro group (O11) lies in the proximity of atom H2, which is bound to atom N2 of the indazole ring (Fig. 1). The intramolecular contact distance between O11 and H2 is 2.35 (2) Å, indicating formation of an intramolecular hydrogen bond (Table 1). With this hydrogen bond, the six atoms O11, N10, C9, C1, N2 and H2 form a pseudo-six-membered ring (the r.m.s. deviation of a least-squares plane through these atoms is about 0.021 Å). The observed length of the single bond C9—N10 [1.4427 (16) Å] is shorter than the theoretical length for a Carom—NO2 bond of 1.47 Å (Glusker et al., 1994), which indicates the formation of a weak conjugated π-electron system along this bond.
The crystal packing in (I) consists of indazole base pairs made up of two symmetry-equivalent hydrogen bonds, N2—H2···N3, that form across inversion centres (Fig. 2 and Table 1). The H2 atom is therefore implicated in two hydrogen bonds. The coplanar base-pair dimers stack in parallel planes which form columns, with an interplanar spacing of 3.3 Å between the dimers. Two kinds of these columns of stacked dimers are formed by the crystal packing and the difference between them is given by the dimer orientation. The planes of the dimer indazole rings in neighbouring columns are approximately perpendicular to each other, with the shortest C4—H4···Cg1 distance of 3.12 Å (Cg1 is the centroid of the phenyl ring of the indazole at −1/2 − x, 1/2 + y, 3/2 − z). Theoretical simulations show that such an arrangement results in favourable intermolecular attractive forces (Koch & Egert, 1995).
Modelling studies based on the Protein Data Bank (PDB; release? ref?) structure of iNOS complexed with imidazole (Crane et al., 1997), in which we calculated the probable position of (I) in the heme cavity of iNOS, showed that the nitro group can lie in the proximity of Glu 371 and can interact with it through a solvent molecule. In this model, the N3 of the indazole partially covers the Fe ion of the heme.