Buy article online - an online subscription or single-article purchase is required to access this article.
Download citation
Download citation
link to html
The title compound, {[Ag(C13H14N2)](C10H6O6S2)0.5·2H2O}n, (I), features a three-dimensional supra­molecular sandwich architecture that consists of two-dimensional cationic layers composed of polymeric chains of silver(I) ions and 1,3-bis­(4-pyrid­yl)propane (bpp) ligands, linked by Ag...Ag and [pi]-[pi] inter­actions, alternating with anionic layers in which uncoordinated naphthalene-1,5-disulfonate (nds2-) anions and solvent water mol­ecules form a hydrogen-bonded network. The asymmetric unit consists of one AgI cation linearly coordinated by N atoms from two bpp ligands, one bpp ligand, one half of an nds2- anion lying on a centre of inversion and two solvent water mol­ecules. The two-dimensional {[Ag(bpp)]+}n cationic and {[(nds)·2H2O]2-}n anionic layers are assembled into a three-dimensional supra­molecular framework through long secondary coordination Ag...O inter­actions between the sulfonate O atoms and AgI centres and through nonclassical C-H...O hydrogen bonds.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270111032902/sq3295sup1.cif
Contains datablocks I, global

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270111032902/sq3295Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

CCDC reference: 846631

Comment top

The construction of coordination polymers and supramolecular compounds based on multitopic ligands and metal centres represents one of the most rapidly developing fields in current coordination chemistry, owing to their potential as functional materials (Blake et al., 1999, 2000; Kitagawa et al., 2004). In the past few years, supramolecular self-assembly chemistry has developed to allow the rational design and preparation of supramolecular architectures through non-covalent interactions, in which it is crucial to meet both geometric and energetic prerequisties (Pedireddi et al., 1996). The hydrogen bond is undoubtedly the most familiar secondary force in supramolecular assemblies, due to its moderately directional intermolecular interaction which may control molecular packing (Zartilas et al., 2007), and many studies have focused on it (Lough et al., 2000; Massoud & Langer, 2009). Compared with hydrogen bonds, ππ and metal–metal interactions have been somewhat less studied and only limited examples generated by a combination of multi-supramolecular interactions have been reported (Goodgame et al., 2002). The naphthalene-1,5-disulfonate anion (nds2-), which possesses six O atoms, has been employed either as a ligand, with multiple binding sites available to construct coordination polymers with varying dimensionalities (Cai, 2004; Lian et al., 2007), or as a counterion, forming extensive hydrogen-bonding interactions with other species (Sakwa & Wheeler, 2003; Voogt & Blanch, 2005). Recently, we have pursued systematic investigations into the assembly of AgI cations with different angular and linear bipodal N-donor ligands, such as rigid aminopyrimidine (Luo, Huang, Zhang et al., 2008; Luo, Huang, Chen et al., 2008; Luo et al., 2009, 2010) and flexible 1,3-bis(4-pyridyl)propane (bpp) or 1,2-bis(4-pyridyl)ethane (bpe) (Luo, Xiong, Dai et al., 2011; Luo, Xiong, Sun et al., 2011; Xiong et al., 2011), with the principal aim of obtaining supramolecular frameworks or multifunctional coordination polymers. In an attempt to exploit the Ag–disulfonate–bpp system, we successfully obtained the title compound, (I), by the solution-phase ultrasonic synthesis technique, and we report its crystal structure here.

Compound (I) crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P21/n with an asymmetric unit comprising an AgI cation, one half of an nds2- anion situated on a centre of inversion, a bpp ligand and two solvent water molecules (Fig. 1). The AgI centre is linearly coordinated by two symmetry-independent N atoms from two bpp ligands [Ag1—N1 = 2.125 (2), Ag1—N2i = 2.135 (2) Å and N1—Ag1—N2i = 171.16 (7)°; symmetry code: (i) x - 1/2, -y + 3/2, z + 1/2]. The average Ag—N distance is comparable with those in previously reported Ag-based compounds (Hao et al., 2009), where the AgI cations have similar coordination geometries.

Generally, the flexible pyridyl-containing bpp ligand can assume four different conformations (TT, 9.1–10.1 Å; TG, 8.6–9.2 Å; GG, 6.7–8.6 Å; and GG, 3.9 Å, where T = trans, G = gauche, and the expected ranges in N···N separations are shown) with respect to the relative orientations of the methylene groups (Carlucci et al., 2002). In (I), each bpp ligand adopts a TG conformation with an N···N separation of 8.678 (2) Å and bridges two different metal centres, yielding one-dimensional sinusoidal cationic chains with Ag(bpp) repeating units [period 23.439 (6) Å]. Adjacent one-dimensional cationic chains interact with each other through Ag···Ag interactions to generate a two-dimensional cationic undulating brick-wall layer of composition {[Ag(bpp)]+}n approximately in the bc plane (Fig. 2). The Ag···Ag separation of 3.0718 (6) Å in (I) is notably shorter than the sum of the van der Waals radii of two Ag+ ions (3.44 Å; Bondi, 1964), indicating the presence of argentophilic interactions (Pyykkö, 1997).

Among the known structures containing the flexible bpp ligand, similar undulating chains have been found in [Ag(bpp)](CFSO3).EtOH and [Ag(bpp)]NO3 (Carlucci et al., 1997; Bateen et al., 1999), but no metal–metal interactions were found in these compounds, in which the shortest Ag···Ag separations are 4.664 (1) Å in the former and 5.287 (2) Å in the latter. The structure of [Ag(bpp)]PF6 is similar to (I) in that the Ag···Ag contact is 3.0852 (9) Å, but the bpp in [Ag(bpp)]PF6 assumes a TT conformation with an N···N separation of 9.699 (7) Å (Pan et al., 2001). Besides argentophilic interactions, aromatic ππ stacking interactions, with centroid-to-centroid distances ranging from 3.6099 (6) to 3.8345 (6) Å between the pyridyl rings of neighbouring bpp ligands, also exist between the chains in (I), helping to consolidate the resulting two-dimensional layer. Topologically, if we define the bpp ligands as single spacers connecting the silver(I) centres, this type of layer can be classified as an example of a (6,3) net.

The H2nds molecule is completely deprotonated to generate the nds2- anion during the synthesis reaction. Each nds2- anion is positioned on an inversion centre and serves as a counteranion to balance the polymeric host charge, while not participating in primary coordination to any AgI centres, reflecting the fact that the coordination ability of bpp is stronger than that of the nds2- anion in this case. Water dimers composed of molecules O1W and O2W are crosslinked with the nds2- sulfonate groups via strong intermolecular O—H···O hydrogen bonds (Table 1), giving rise to anionic double chains that are interconnected by O2W–H2WA···O1vi [symmetry code: (vi) -x + 1/2, y + 1/2, -z + 1/2] hydrogen bonds to form an ordered two-dimensional water–nds anionic layer, {[(nds).2H2O]2-}n (Fig. 3), parallel to the cationic {[Ag(bpp)]+}n sheet. The hydrogen-bond motif R54(12) (Bernstein et al., 1995), constructed through water molecules and nds2- sulfonate groups, can be found between the double chains.

The two-dimensional cationic and anionic layers in (I) are stacked following an alternating –ABAB– sequence, resulting in a three-dimensional metallo-supramolecular sandwich lamellar network, in which the water–anion layered species occupy the interlayer spacings between the metallo-organic networks (Fig. 4). Weak interactions between the sulfonate O atom and the AgI centre are present in the three-dimensional supramolecular framework. Compared with normal Ag—O coordination bonds in silver sulfonates spanning the range 2.377 (3)-2.574 (4) Å (Gao et al., 2005; Lian et al., 2007), the present Ag···O interactions of 2.7923 (6) Å are a little longer but still fall in the secondary-bonding range (the sum of the van der Waals radii of Ag and O is 3.24 Å; Bondi, 1964). Previously reported Ag(bpp) salts with simple inorganic anions (such as PF6-, ClO4-, NO3- etc.) do not exhibit these alternating cation–anion layers. Other Ag(bpp) salts containing non-coordinated organic carboxylates as counteranions (such as succinate) display similar –ABAB– stacking of cationic and anionic sheets (Luo, Xiong, Sun et al., 2011), but the main difference is that the layers are primarily linked by O—H···O hydrogen bonds between water molecules coordinated to the AgI cations and the carboxylate groups, instead of by long interlayer Ag···O interactions such as those found in (I).

Related literature top

For related literature, see: Bateen et al. (1999); Bernstein et al. (1995); Blake et al. (1999, 2000); Bondi (1964); Cai (2004); Carlucci et al. (1997, 2002); Gao et al. (2005); Goodgame et al. (2002); Hao et al. (2009); Kitagawa et al. (2004); Lian et al. (2007); Lough et al. (2000); Luo et al. (2009, 2010); Luo, Huang, Chen, Lin & Zheng (2008); Luo, Huang, Zhang, Lin & Zheng (2008); Luo, Xiong & Dai (2011); Luo, Xiong, Sun, Wu, Huang & Dai (2011); Massoud & Langer (2009); Pan et al. (2001); Pedireddi et al. (1996); Pyykkö (1997); Sakwa & Wheeler (2003); Voogt & Blanch (2005); Xiong et al. (2011); Zartilas (2007).

Experimental top

A mixture of Ag2O (115 mg, 0.5 mmol), 1,3-bis(4-pyridyl)propane (205 mg, 1 mmol) and 1,5-naphthalenedisulfonic acid (280 mg, 1 mmol) in CH3OH–H2O (10 ml, 1:4 v/v) was subjected to ultrasonic treatment at ambient temperature for 10 min. Aqueous NH3 (25%) was then added dropwise to the mixture to give a clear solution. The resulting solution was protected from light and allowed to evaporate slowly at room temperature. Colourless crystals of (I) were isolated after 6 d (yield 45% based on Ag2O). Analysis, calculated for C18H21AgN2O5S: C 44.55, H 4.36, N 5.77%; found: C 44.36, H 4.41, N 5.81%.

Refinement top

All water H atoms were positioned from difference Fourier maps and included as riding atoms, with O—H = 0.85 Å and Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(O). C-bound H atoms were placed in calculated riding positions, with C—H = 0.95 (aromatic) or 0.99 Å (methyl) and Uiso(H) = 1.2 Ueq(C).

Computing details top

Data collection: CrysAlis CCD (Oxford Diffraction, 2008); cell refinement: CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2008); data reduction: CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2008); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The molecular structure and atom-labelling scheme of (I), showing the coordination environment of the AgI centre. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the ??% probability level. [Please complete] [Symmetry codes: (i) x - 1/2, -y + 3/2, z + 1/2; (iv) -x, -y + 1, -z + 1.]
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. A view of the two-dimensional undulating cationic {[Ag(bpp)]+}n layer, with the interchain Ag···Ag [A = 3.0718 (6) Å] and ππ interactions [B = 3.6099 (6) Å and C = 3.8345 (6) Å] shown as dadshed lines. [Symmetry code: (ii) -x + 1, -y + 1, -z + 1.]
[Figure 3] Fig. 3. A view of the two-dimensional water–nds anionic sheet, {[(nds).2H2O]2-}n, constructed by double anion chains linked by hydrogen bonds (dotted lines). [Symmetry code: (vi) -x + 1/2, y + 1/2, -z + 1/2.]
[Figure 4] Fig. 4. The three-dimensional metallo-supramolecular sandwich-like network of (I) constructed from two-dimensional {[Ag(bpp)]+}n and {[(nds).2H2O]2-}n layers through Ag···O interactions (thick dashed lines).
catena-Poly[[silver(I)-µ-1,3-bis(4-pyridyl)propane] hemi(naphthalene-1,5-disulfonate) dihydrate] top
Crystal data top
[Ag(C13H14N2)](C10H6O6S2)0.5·2H2OF(000) = 984
Mr = 485.30Dx = 1.726 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ynCell parameters from 15345 reflections
a = 10.640 (2) Åθ = 5.5–56.8°
b = 9.2720 (19) ŵ = 1.22 mm1
c = 19.194 (4) ÅT = 173 K
β = 99.55 (3)°Plate, colourless
V = 1867.4 (6) Å30.19 × 0.16 × 0.09 mm
Z = 4
Data collection top
Oxford Gemini S Ultra
diffractometer
3666 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube3398 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.036
ω scansθmax = 26.0°, θmin = 3.0°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(CrysAlis RED; Oxford Diffraction, 2008)
h = 1312
Tmin = 0.801, Tmax = 0.898k = 1011
13094 measured reflectionsl = 2323
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.028H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.068 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0273P)2 + 1.4469P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.07(Δ/σ)max = 0.002
3666 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.55 e Å3
245 parametersΔρmin = 0.94 e Å3
0 restraintsExtinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction coefficient: 0.0091 (5)
Crystal data top
[Ag(C13H14N2)](C10H6O6S2)0.5·2H2OV = 1867.4 (6) Å3
Mr = 485.30Z = 4
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation
a = 10.640 (2) ŵ = 1.22 mm1
b = 9.2720 (19) ÅT = 173 K
c = 19.194 (4) Å0.19 × 0.16 × 0.09 mm
β = 99.55 (3)°
Data collection top
Oxford Gemini S Ultra
diffractometer
3666 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(CrysAlis RED; Oxford Diffraction, 2008)
3398 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.801, Tmax = 0.898Rint = 0.036
13094 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0280 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.068H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.07Δρmax = 0.55 e Å3
3666 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.94 e Å3
245 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2sigma(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Ag10.455371 (19)0.624463 (19)0.542728 (9)0.03071 (9)
N10.50747 (19)0.7807 (2)0.47167 (10)0.0242 (4)
N20.89809 (19)1.0048 (2)0.12405 (10)0.0241 (4)
C60.4456 (2)0.7965 (2)0.40516 (12)0.0244 (5)
H6A0.37390.73690.38930.029*
C70.4822 (2)0.8963 (2)0.35890 (12)0.0239 (5)
H7A0.43540.90460.31240.029*
C80.5874 (2)0.9846 (2)0.38001 (11)0.0219 (5)
C90.6500 (2)0.9683 (2)0.44929 (12)0.0255 (5)
H9A0.72151.02700.46670.031*
C100.6077 (2)0.8666 (2)0.49267 (12)0.0266 (5)
H10A0.65190.85730.53970.032*
C110.6282 (2)1.0906 (3)0.32836 (12)0.0259 (5)
H11A0.56181.16600.31830.031*
H11B0.63171.03920.28350.031*
C120.7561 (2)1.1643 (2)0.35204 (12)0.0249 (5)
H12A0.82211.08980.36600.030*
H12B0.75071.22450.39400.030*
C130.7961 (2)1.2594 (2)0.29392 (12)0.0261 (5)
H13A0.72521.32550.27550.031*
H13B0.87031.31880.31450.031*
C140.8303 (2)1.1719 (2)0.23389 (11)0.0215 (4)
C150.9413 (2)1.0900 (3)0.24266 (12)0.0254 (5)
H15A0.99641.08990.28700.031*
C160.9719 (2)1.0094 (2)0.18824 (12)0.0262 (5)
H16A1.04840.95450.19600.031*
C170.7913 (2)1.0835 (3)0.11507 (12)0.0270 (5)
H17A0.73821.08210.07010.032*
C180.7541 (2)1.1667 (2)0.16777 (12)0.0260 (5)
H18A0.67681.22000.15890.031*
O10.21665 (17)0.25635 (17)0.35755 (8)0.0296 (4)
O20.29815 (15)0.47979 (17)0.41289 (9)0.0282 (4)
O30.11503 (16)0.48200 (17)0.31876 (8)0.0273 (4)
C10.0845 (2)0.3843 (2)0.44168 (10)0.0171 (4)
C20.0555 (2)0.2488 (2)0.46246 (11)0.0206 (4)
H2A0.08690.16660.44120.025*
C30.0212 (2)0.7694 (2)0.48456 (11)0.0218 (5)
H3A0.04110.86390.47060.026*
C40.0668 (2)0.6530 (2)0.45328 (11)0.0201 (4)
H4A0.11800.66710.41780.024*
C50.03842 (19)0.5103 (2)0.47328 (10)0.0161 (4)
S10.18676 (5)0.40246 (5)0.37745 (3)0.01914 (13)
O1W0.16149 (18)0.04413 (18)0.37627 (9)0.0354 (4)
H1WA0.17960.04180.36610.042*
H1WB0.17040.09860.34180.042*
O2W0.1826 (2)0.75097 (18)0.27239 (10)0.0417 (5)
H2WA0.21190.74620.23390.050*
H2WB0.16380.66620.28410.050*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Ag10.04047 (15)0.02924 (13)0.02606 (12)0.00629 (7)0.01622 (9)0.00518 (7)
N10.0274 (11)0.0269 (9)0.0200 (9)0.0060 (8)0.0094 (8)0.0009 (7)
N20.0257 (11)0.0273 (10)0.0206 (9)0.0041 (8)0.0081 (8)0.0002 (7)
C60.0213 (12)0.0253 (11)0.0271 (12)0.0021 (8)0.0057 (9)0.0006 (9)
C70.0220 (12)0.0266 (11)0.0228 (11)0.0028 (9)0.0027 (9)0.0006 (9)
C80.0203 (12)0.0236 (10)0.0227 (11)0.0043 (8)0.0059 (9)0.0013 (8)
C90.0223 (13)0.0288 (11)0.0252 (11)0.0006 (9)0.0032 (9)0.0038 (9)
C100.0300 (14)0.0326 (12)0.0171 (11)0.0060 (10)0.0037 (9)0.0012 (9)
C110.0244 (13)0.0319 (12)0.0216 (11)0.0015 (9)0.0040 (9)0.0025 (9)
C120.0260 (13)0.0289 (11)0.0213 (11)0.0006 (9)0.0078 (9)0.0035 (9)
C130.0267 (13)0.0246 (11)0.0288 (12)0.0017 (9)0.0094 (10)0.0033 (9)
C140.0206 (12)0.0202 (10)0.0252 (11)0.0036 (8)0.0080 (9)0.0023 (8)
C150.0205 (12)0.0348 (12)0.0203 (11)0.0019 (9)0.0009 (9)0.0016 (9)
C160.0207 (13)0.0320 (12)0.0269 (12)0.0047 (9)0.0062 (9)0.0025 (9)
C170.0250 (13)0.0341 (12)0.0208 (11)0.0033 (10)0.0002 (9)0.0019 (9)
C180.0171 (12)0.0303 (11)0.0299 (12)0.0015 (9)0.0016 (9)0.0041 (9)
O10.0412 (11)0.0234 (8)0.0283 (8)0.0031 (7)0.0184 (8)0.0005 (6)
O20.0181 (9)0.0326 (8)0.0355 (9)0.0033 (7)0.0089 (7)0.0012 (7)
O30.0359 (10)0.0301 (8)0.0168 (7)0.0009 (7)0.0068 (7)0.0042 (6)
C10.0144 (11)0.0236 (10)0.0133 (9)0.0001 (8)0.0023 (8)0.0006 (7)
C20.0187 (12)0.0203 (10)0.0232 (11)0.0001 (8)0.0045 (9)0.0027 (8)
C30.0229 (12)0.0185 (10)0.0249 (11)0.0033 (8)0.0063 (9)0.0024 (8)
C40.0174 (11)0.0223 (10)0.0208 (10)0.0030 (8)0.0043 (8)0.0022 (8)
C50.0130 (11)0.0201 (10)0.0144 (9)0.0005 (8)0.0001 (8)0.0005 (7)
S10.0206 (3)0.0208 (3)0.0179 (3)0.00009 (19)0.0087 (2)0.00049 (19)
O1W0.0444 (12)0.0287 (9)0.0362 (10)0.0007 (8)0.0156 (8)0.0007 (7)
O2W0.0702 (15)0.0273 (9)0.0334 (9)0.0045 (9)0.0256 (9)0.0001 (7)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Ag1—N12.1250 (19)C14—C151.391 (3)
Ag1—N2i2.1353 (19)C14—C181.389 (3)
Ag1—Ag1ii3.0718 (6)C15—C161.367 (3)
N1—C101.339 (3)C15—H15A0.9500
N1—C61.344 (3)C16—H16A0.9500
N2—C171.338 (3)C17—C181.381 (3)
N2—C161.348 (3)C17—H17A0.9500
N2—Ag1iii2.1353 (19)C18—H18A0.9500
C6—C71.382 (3)O1—S11.4570 (16)
C6—H6A0.9500O2—S11.4540 (17)
C7—C81.391 (3)O3—S11.4526 (16)
C7—H7A0.9500C1—C21.369 (3)
C8—C91.393 (3)C1—C51.440 (3)
C8—C111.510 (3)C1—S11.782 (2)
C9—C101.382 (3)C2—C3iv1.415 (3)
C9—H9A0.9500C2—H2A0.9500
C10—H10A0.9500C3—C41.364 (3)
C11—C121.523 (3)C3—C2iv1.415 (3)
C11—H11A0.9900C3—H3A0.9500
C11—H11B0.9900C4—C51.423 (3)
C12—C131.537 (3)C4—H4A0.9500
C12—H12A0.9900C5—C5iv1.427 (4)
C12—H12B0.9900O1W—H1WA0.8499
C13—C141.502 (3)O1W—H1WB0.8499
C13—H13A0.9900O2W—H2WA0.8503
C13—H13B0.9900O2W—H2WB0.8501
N1—Ag1—N2i171.16 (7)C12—C13—H13B109.2
N1—Ag1—Ag1ii91.88 (5)H13A—C13—H13B107.9
N2i—Ag1—Ag1ii96.87 (5)C15—C14—C18116.5 (2)
C10—N1—C6117.5 (2)C15—C14—C13120.7 (2)
C10—N1—Ag1119.48 (15)C18—C14—C13122.7 (2)
C6—N1—Ag1123.05 (16)C16—C15—C14120.8 (2)
C17—N2—C16117.0 (2)C16—C15—H15A119.6
C17—N2—Ag1iii123.46 (15)C14—C15—H15A119.6
C16—N2—Ag1iii119.49 (16)N2—C16—C15122.6 (2)
N1—C6—C7122.5 (2)N2—C16—H16A118.7
N1—C6—H6A118.7C15—C16—H16A118.7
C7—C6—H6A118.7N2—C17—C18123.4 (2)
C6—C7—C8120.4 (2)N2—C17—H17A118.3
C6—C7—H7A119.8C18—C17—H17A118.3
C8—C7—H7A119.8C17—C18—C14119.6 (2)
C7—C8—C9116.6 (2)C17—C18—H18A120.2
C7—C8—C11119.8 (2)C14—C18—H18A120.2
C9—C8—C11123.6 (2)C2—C1—C5120.89 (19)
C10—C9—C8119.8 (2)C2—C1—S1118.78 (16)
C10—C9—H9A120.1C5—C1—S1120.26 (15)
C8—C9—H9A120.1C1—C2—C3iv120.23 (19)
N1—C10—C9123.2 (2)C1—C2—H2A119.9
N1—C10—H10A118.4C3iv—C2—H2A119.9
C9—C10—H10A118.4C4—C3—C2iv120.8 (2)
C8—C11—C12115.85 (19)C4—C3—H3A119.6
C8—C11—H11A108.3C2iv—C3—H3A119.6
C12—C11—H11A108.3C3—C4—C5120.7 (2)
C8—C11—H11B108.3C3—C4—H4A119.7
C12—C11—H11B108.3C5—C4—H4A119.7
H11A—C11—H11B107.4C4—C5—C5iv119.4 (2)
C11—C12—C13112.47 (19)C4—C5—C1122.58 (19)
C11—C12—H12A109.1C5iv—C5—C1118.0 (2)
C13—C12—H12A109.1O3—S1—O2113.27 (10)
C11—C12—H12B109.1O3—S1—O1112.23 (10)
C13—C12—H12B109.1O2—S1—O1112.63 (10)
H12A—C12—H12B107.8O3—S1—C1106.37 (10)
C14—C13—C12112.25 (18)O2—S1—C1105.48 (10)
C14—C13—H13A109.2O1—S1—C1106.14 (9)
C12—C13—H13A109.2H1WA—O1W—H1WB108.6
C14—C13—H13B109.2H2WA—O2W—H2WB108.5
Symmetry codes: (i) x1/2, y+3/2, z+1/2; (ii) x+1, y+1, z+1; (iii) x+1/2, y+3/2, z1/2; (iv) x, y+1, z+1.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1W—H1WA···O10.852.042.882 (2)171
O1W—H1WB···O2Wv0.851.952.790 (2)171
O2W—H2WA···O1vi0.852.032.874 (2)174
O2W—H2WB···O30.851.942.782 (2)174
C6—H6A···O20.952.583.344 (3)138
C7—H7A···O3vi0.952.593.487 (3)158
Symmetry codes: (v) x, y1, z; (vi) x+1/2, y+1/2, z+1/2.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula[Ag(C13H14N2)](C10H6O6S2)0.5·2H2O
Mr485.30
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/n
Temperature (K)173
a, b, c (Å)10.640 (2), 9.2720 (19), 19.194 (4)
β (°) 99.55 (3)
V3)1867.4 (6)
Z4
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)1.22
Crystal size (mm)0.19 × 0.16 × 0.09
Data collection
DiffractometerOxford Gemini S Ultra
diffractometer
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(CrysAlis RED; Oxford Diffraction, 2008)
Tmin, Tmax0.801, 0.898
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
13094, 3666, 3398
Rint0.036
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.617
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.028, 0.068, 1.07
No. of reflections3666
No. of parameters245
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.55, 0.94

Computer programs: CrysAlis CCD (Oxford Diffraction, 2008), CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2008), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2008).

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1W—H1WA···O10.852.042.882 (2)170.7
O1W—H1WB···O2Wi0.851.952.790 (2)170.5
O2W—H2WA···O1ii0.852.032.874 (2)174.4
O2W—H2WB···O30.851.942.782 (2)174.2
C6—H6A···O20.952.583.344 (3)137.7
C7—H7A···O3ii0.952.593.487 (3)158.1
Symmetry codes: (i) x, y1, z; (ii) x+1/2, y+1/2, z+1/2.
 

Subscribe to Acta Crystallographica Section C: Structural Chemistry

The full text of this article is available to subscribers to the journal.

If you have already registered and are using a computer listed in your registration details, please email support@iucr.org for assistance.

Buy online

You may purchase this article in PDF and/or HTML formats. For purchasers in the European Community who do not have a VAT number, VAT will be added at the local rate. Payments to the IUCr are handled by WorldPay, who will accept payment by credit card in several currencies. To purchase the article, please complete the form below (fields marked * are required), and then click on `Continue'.
E-mail address* 
Repeat e-mail address* 
(for error checking) 

Format*   PDF (US $40)
   HTML (US $40)
   PDF+HTML (US $50)
In order for VAT to be shown for your country javascript needs to be enabled.

VAT number 
(non-UK EC countries only) 
Country* 
 

Terms and conditions of use
Contact us

Follow Acta Cryst. C
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds