Supporting information
Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270109030601/sq3206sup1.cif | |
Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270109030601/sq3206Isup2.hkl |
The crystal was cut from a larger one, synthesized using the Czochralski method in the same batch as that previously investigated by Milenov et al. (2007). High-pressure data at 7.30 GPa were collected in a diamond anvil cell of the Boehler–Almax type (Boehler & de Hantsetters, 2004; Boehler, 2006) at room temperature using a Stoe IPDS 2 T diffractometer with Mo Kα radiation. A 0.25 mm hole was drilled into a stainless steel gasket preindented to a thickness of about 0.08 mm. The intensities were indexed and integrated using X-AREA (Stoe & Cie, 1998). Areas of the images shaded by the diamond anvil cell were masked prior to integration. Corrections for the effects of absorption by the diamond anvil and the crystal were made using the programs ABSORB (Angel, 2006) and X-RED (Stoe & Cie, 1998), respectively. The shape of the crystal was approximated by 20 faces using the program X-SHAPE (Stoe & Cie, 1998). The ruby luminescence method (Mao et al., 1986) was used for pressure calibration, and a mixture of methanol and ethanol was used as the pressure medium. The error in the pressure determination was estimated to be 0.02 GPa.
To confirm the absolute structure, the model was refined as an inversion twin. The refined twin fraction corresponds with a Flack parameter of 0.00 (9) (Flack & Bernardinelli, 1999).
Data collection: X-AREA (Stoe & Cie, 1998); cell refinement: X-AREA (Stoe & Cie, 1998); data reduction: JANA2006 (Petříček et al., 2006); program(s) used to solve structure: SIR97 (Altomare et al., 1999); program(s) used to refine structure: JANA2006 (Petříček et al., 2006); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 1999); software used to prepare material for publication: JANA2006 (Petříček et al., 2006).
Bi4Ge3O12 | Dx = 7.868 Mg m−3 |
Mr = 1245.7 | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71069 Å |
Cubic, I43d | Cell parameters from 1616 reflections |
Hall symbol: I -4acd;2ab;3 | θ = 9.8–56.5° |
a = 10.168 (1) Å | µ = 75.24 mm−1 |
V = 1051.25 (18) Å3 | T = 293 K |
Z = 4 | Irregular shape, colourless |
F(000) = 2096 | 0.10 × 0.09 × 0.06 mm |
Stoe IPDS 2T diffractometer | 212 independent reflections |
Radiation source: X-ray tube | 174 reflections with I > 3σ(I) |
Plane graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.085 |
Detector resolution: 6.67 pixels mm-1 | θmax = 28.5°, θmin = 4.9° |
rotation method scans | h = −10→9 |
Absorption correction: numerical (X-RED; Stoe & Cie, 1998) | k = −13→13 |
Tmin = 0.009, Tmax = 0.018 | l = −11→11 |
2935 measured reflections |
Refinement on F | 0 constraints |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.056 | Weighting scheme based on measured s.u.'s w = 1/(σ2(F) + 0.0001F2) |
wR(F2) = 0.056 | (Δ/σ)max = 0.039 |
S = 2.72 | Δρmax = 8.04 (1.58Å from O1) e Å−3 |
212 reflections | Δρmin = −5.36 e Å−3 |
8 parameters | Absolute structure: Flack (1983), inversion twin model tested |
0 restraints | Absolute structure parameter: 0.00 (9) |
Bi4Ge3O12 | Z = 4 |
Mr = 1245.7 | Mo Kα radiation |
Cubic, I43d | µ = 75.24 mm−1 |
a = 10.168 (1) Å | T = 293 K |
V = 1051.25 (18) Å3 | 0.10 × 0.09 × 0.06 mm |
Stoe IPDS 2T diffractometer | 212 independent reflections |
Absorption correction: numerical (X-RED; Stoe & Cie, 1998) | 174 reflections with I > 3σ(I) |
Tmin = 0.009, Tmax = 0.018 | Rint = 0.085 |
2935 measured reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.056 | 0 restraints |
wR(F2) = 0.056 | Δρmax = 8.04 (1.58Å from O1) e Å−3 |
S = 2.72 | Δρmin = −5.36 e Å−3 |
212 reflections | Absolute structure: Flack (1983), inversion twin model tested |
8 parameters | Absolute structure parameter: 0.00 (9) |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
Bi1 | 0.91972 (14) | 0.08028 (14) | 0.58028 (14) | 0.0121 (6)* | |
Ge1 | 0.75 | 0.375 | 0.5 | 0.0100 (16)* | |
O1 | 0.8727 (19) | 0.2881 (19) | 0.578 (2) | 0.012 (5)* |
Bi1—O1 | 2.167 (19) | Bi1—O1v | 2.167 (19) |
Bi1—O1i | 2.499 (19) | Ge1—O1 | 1.72 (2) |
Bi1—O1ii | 2.167 (19) | Ge1—O1vi | 1.72 (2) |
Bi1—O1iii | 2.499 (19) | Ge1—O1vii | 1.72 (2) |
Bi1—O1iv | 2.499 (19) | Ge1—O1viii | 1.72 (2) |
O1—Bi1—O1i | 70.4 (7) | O1ii—Bi1—O1v | 78.3 (8) |
O1—Bi1—O1ii | 78.3 (8) | O1iii—Bi1—O1iv | 116.7 (7) |
O1—Bi1—O1iii | 146.2 (7) | O1iii—Bi1—O1v | 83.2 (8) |
O1—Bi1—O1iv | 83.2 (8) | O1iv—Bi1—O1v | 70.4 (7) |
O1—Bi1—O1v | 78.3 (8) | O1—Ge1—O1vi | 118.3 (9) |
O1i—Bi1—O1ii | 83.2 (8) | O1—Ge1—O1vii | 105.2 (10) |
O1i—Bi1—O1iii | 116.7 (7) | O1—Ge1—O1viii | 105.2 (10) |
O1i—Bi1—O1iv | 116.7 (7) | O1vi—Ge1—O1vii | 105.2 (10) |
O1i—Bi1—O1v | 146.2 (7) | O1vi—Ge1—O1viii | 105.2 (10) |
O1ii—Bi1—O1iii | 70.4 (7) | O1vii—Ge1—O1viii | 118.3 (9) |
O1ii—Bi1—O1iv | 146.2 (7) |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+2, −y+1/2, z; (ii) −z+3/2, −x+1, y+1/2; (iii) −z+3/2, x−1, −y+1; (iv) y+1/2, z−1/2, x−1/2; (v) −y+1, z−1/2, −x+3/2; (vi) −x+3/2, y, −z+1; (vii) z+1/4, −y+3/4, −x+5/4; (viii) −z+5/4, −y+3/4, x−1/4. |
Experimental details
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | Bi4Ge3O12 |
Mr | 1245.7 |
Crystal system, space group | Cubic, I43d |
Temperature (K) | 293 |
a (Å) | 10.168 (1) |
V (Å3) | 1051.25 (18) |
Z | 4 |
Radiation type | Mo Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 75.24 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.10 × 0.09 × 0.06 |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Stoe IPDS 2T diffractometer |
Absorption correction | Numerical (X-RED; Stoe & Cie, 1998) |
Tmin, Tmax | 0.009, 0.018 |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 3σ(I)] reflections | 2935, 212, 174 |
Rint | 0.085 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.671 |
Refinement | |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.056, 0.056, 2.72 |
No. of reflections | 212 |
No. of parameters | 8 |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 8.04 (1.58Å from O1), −5.36 |
Absolute structure | Flack (1983), inversion twin model tested |
Absolute structure parameter | 0.00 (9) |
Computer programs: X-AREA (Stoe & Cie, 1998), JANA2006 (Petříček et al., 2006), SIR97 (Altomare et al., 1999), DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 1999).
Bi1—O1 | 2.167 (19) | Ge1—O1 | 1.72 (2) |
Bi1—O1i | 2.499 (19) | ||
O1—Ge1—O1ii | 118.3 (9) | O1—Ge1—O1iii | 105.2 (10) |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+2, −y+1/2, z; (ii) −x+3/2, y, −z+1; (iii) z+1/4, −y+3/4, −x+5/4. |
Tetrabismuth tris(germanate) Bi4Ge3O12 (BGO) is an important material for scintillation detectors (Milenov et al., 2007) and holographic applications (Marinova et al., 2009). At atmospheric pressure, its crystal structure (I43d, Z = 4) is built up of isolated GeO4 tetrahedra and strongly deformed BiO6 octahedra (Durif & Averbuch-Pouchot, 1982; Fischer & Waldner, 1982; Milenov et al., 2007). The asymmetric coordination sphere around the Bi3+ cations, with three Bi—O distances of 2.16 Å and three others of 2.60 Å (Milenov et al., 2007), is due to the stereoactivity of its non-bonded lone electron pair (Pushkin et al., 2000).
The onset of irreversible pressure-induced amorphization of Bi4Ge3O12 occurs at about 8.0 GPa at room temperature, as evidenced by the decrease of the intensities of the powder X-ray diffraction peaks (Arora et al., 2004), with the process being complete above 12 GPa (Meng et al., 1998; Arora et al., 2004). The compound has a bulk modulus of 48 (2) GPa with a first pressure derivative of 9(1).
At atmospheric pressure, the coordination numbers (CN) of the Bi3+ cations in BiOn polyhedra of crystalline solids vary from 3 to 10 (Pushkin et al., 2000). The volume and activity of the lone pair of electrons (E) diminish when the number of O atoms bonded to the cation increases. The effect of pressure, associated with the increase of CN and with the coordination polyhedra becoming more regular, is similar, and the stereochemical activity of the lone pair is suppressed on compression (Grzechnik, 2007). For instance, α-Bi2O3 (P21/c, Z = 4) has a structure with two non-equivalent Bi atoms in distorted BiO5E and BiO6 octahedral coordinations at ambient conditions (Ivanov et al., 2001). A new polymorph of Bi2O3 synthesized at 6 GPa and 1153 K (Atou et al., 1998) has the structure of the A-type rare earth sesquioxides (P3m1, Z = 1), with the Bi atom coordinated by seven O atoms in a capped octahedron. In this new phase, the stereoactivity of the E pair on the Bi3+ cation is completely suppressed.
The purpose of this study was to determine the crystal structure of Bi4Ge3O12 close to the onset of its pressure-induced amorphization at room temperature. Of special interest was the pressure dependence of the coordination environment around the Bi3+ cation. Intuitively, one could argue that BGO reaches a limit of its stability at about 8.0 GPa because either the CN of the Bi3+ cation has increased or the octahedron around the Bi3+ cation has become regular. To clarify this issue, hydrostatic single-crystal X-ray diffraction measurements were performed in a diamond anvil cell at room temperature.
The indexing of the single-crystal X-ray diffraction data and analysis of the reconstructed reciprocal space at 7.30 GPa indicated that BGO did not undergo any phase transition. This observation supports the previous report that the material is structurally stable up to the onset of pressure-induced amorphization at about 8.0 GPa (Arora et al., 2004).
The refinement of the data based on the structural model obtained using the program SIR97 (Altomare et al., 1999) produced a structure, with GeO4 tetrahedra and distorted BiO6 octahedra (Fig. 1), isotypical with that reported for Bi4Ge3O12 (I43d, Z = 4) under ambient conditions (Durif & Averbuch-Pouchot, 1982; Fischer & Waldner, 1982; Milenov et al., 2007). A comparison of the Ge—O bond distances and O—Ge—O angles in Table 1 with those at atmosperic pressure (1.74 Å, and 105.6 and 117.5°, respectively; Durif & Averbuch-Pouchot, 1982; Fischer & Waldner, 1982; Milenov et al., 2007) shows that the GeO4 tetrahedra are rigid and insensitive to increased pressure. The small bulk modulus of the material can be explained by significant shortening of the three long Bi—O bond distances (2.60 Å at room temperature and ambient pressure) in the octahedral coordination environment around the Bi3+ cation, while the other three shorter Bi—O distances (2.16 Å at room temperature and ambient pressure) do not change on compression (Milenov et al., 2007). On the other hand, increased pressure hardly influences the angular distortion of the BiO6 octahedron (Fig. 2).
The results of this study demonstrate that the structural instability of Bi4Ge3O12 at high pressure is due neither to an increased CN of the Bi3+ cation nor to the octahedron around the Bi3+ cation becoming more regular. However, they do not contradict the argument by Arora et al. (2004) that the pressure-induced amorphization of BGO arises from kinetically hindered decomposition of the material, favourable at all pressures.