Download citation
Download citation
link to html
The Hirshfeld atom-based X-ray constrained wavefunction fitting (HA-XCW) procedure is tested for its reproducibility, and the information content of the fitted wavefunction is critically assessed. Fourteen different α-oxalic acid dihydrate data sets are used for this purpose, and the first joint fitting to 12 of these data sets is reported. There are systematic features in the electron density obtained from all data sets which agree with higher level benchmark calculations, but there are also many other strong systematic features which disagree with the reference calculations, most notably those associated with the electron density near the nuclei. To enhance reproducibility, three new protocols are described and tested to address the halting problem of XCW fitting, namely: an empirical power-function method, which is useful for estimating the accuracy of the structure factor uncertainties; an asymptotic extrapolation method based on ideas from density functional theory; and a `conservative method' whereby the smallest value of the regularization parameter is chosen from a series of data sets, or subsets.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S2052520622004103/so5075sup1.cif
Contains datablock I

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S2052520622004103/so5075Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

pdf

Portable Document Format (PDF) file https://doi.org/10.1107/S2052520622004103/so5075sup3.pdf
Supplementary material

zip

Zip compressed file https://doi.org/10.1107/S2052520622004103/so5075sup4.zip
Other CIF refinements

CCDC reference: 2144303

Computing details top

(I) top
Crystal data top
C2H2O4·2(H2O)c = 11.8409 (7) Å
Mr = 126.07β = 103.842 (2)°
Monoclinic, p121/c1V = 244.63 (3) Å3
Hall symbol: -p 2ybcZ = 2
a = 6.0931 (4) ÅT = 100 K
b = 3.4921 (2) Å
Data collection top
29251 independent reflectionsk =
29251 reflections with F > 0 and F/u(F) > 4.0 and |F_calc| > 103l =
h =
Refinement top
Refinement on F0 constraints
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: HAR
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.018All H-atom parameters refined
wR(F2) = 0.023Weighting scheme based on measured s.u.'s w = 1/σ(F)
S = 1.34(Δ/σ)max = 0.008
29251 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.10 e Å3
75 parametersΔρmin = 0.16 e Å3
0 restraints
Special details top

Refinement. . If constraints were applied they are defined by zero eigenvalues of the least-squares hessian, see the value of _refine_ls_SVD_threshold

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O10.434843 (6)0.444113 (11)0.349875 (3)0.013296 (12)
O20.242444 (6)0.742551 (11)0.463699 (3)0.013083 (12)
C10.403061 (6)0.558829 (11)0.448007 (3)0.009745 (12)
H10.3003 (4)0.5213 (6)0.27715 (18)0.0221 (10)
O50.130058 (6)0.631165 (11)0.178524 (3)0.012943 (12)
H30.1903 (3)0.6987 (6)0.11297 (17)0.0303 (10)
H40.0062 (3)0.4561 (6)0.14983 (16)0.0280 (10)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.012827 (11)0.018637 (14)0.008030 (11)0.004463 (9)0.001718 (8)0.000636 (9)
O20.011235 (11)0.018065 (13)0.009269 (12)0.005241 (9)0.001111 (8)0.000655 (9)
C10.009367 (11)0.011626 (13)0.007895 (12)0.001769 (8)0.001381 (9)0.000076 (9)
H10.0233 (9)0.0277 (11)0.0181 (12)0.0011 (9)0.0105 (8)0.0038 (10)
O50.010789 (11)0.017895 (14)0.009309 (11)0.001605 (9)0.000757 (8)0.000995 (9)
H30.0253 (9)0.0318 (10)0.0324 (11)0.0000 (8)0.0039 (7)0.0058 (9)
H40.0258 (8)0.0304 (10)0.0272 (10)0.0009 (8)0.0052 (7)0.0008 (8)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
O1—C11.2868 (1)O5—H30.964 (2)
O2—C11.2210 (1)O5—H40.9676 (18)
O1—H11.072 (2)
O1—C1—O2126.887 (4)H3—O5—H4106.70 (15)
C1—O1—H1113.32 (10)
O2—C1—O1—H11.02 (13)
 

Follow Acta Cryst. B
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds