Download citation
Download citation
link to html
The successful attempt to solve the crystal structure of Co(CO3)0.5(OH)·0.11H2O (denoted CCH), based on synchrotron powder diffraction data, leads to a drastic revision of the chemical formula to Co6(CO3)2(OH)8·H2O [hexa­cobalt(II) bis­(carbonate) octa­hydroxide monohydrate] and to a hexa­gonal cell instead of the ortho­rhom­bic cell suggested previously [Porta et al. (1992). J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 88, 311–319]. This results in a new structure-type related to malachite involving infinite chains of [CoO6] octa­hedra sharing edges along a short c axis, delimiting tunnels having a three-branched star section. All reports discussing cobalt hy­droxy­carbonates (CCH) without any structural knowledge and especially its topotactic decomposition into Co3O4 have, as a result, to be reconsidered.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S2053229618017734/sk3716sup1.cif
Contains datablock I

rtv

Rietveld powder data file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S2053229618017734/sk3716Isup2.rtv
Contains datablock I

CCDC reference: 1885213

Computing details top

Program(s) used to solve structure: McMaille (Le Bail, 2004) and ESPOIR (Le Bail, 2001); program(s) used to refine structure: FULLPROF (Rodriguez-Carvajal, 1993); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 1999); software used to prepare material for publication: publCIF (Westrip, 2010).

Hexacobalt(II) bis(carbonate) octahydroxide monohydrate top
Crystal data top
Co6(CO3)2(OH)8·H2ODx = 3.617 Mg m3
Mr = 627.69Synchrotron radiation, λ = 0.807700 Å
Hexagonal, P62mµ = 12.06 mm1
Hall symbol: P -6 -2T = 293 K
a = 10.3236 (4) ÅParticle morphology: powder of nanoneedles
c = 3.12244 (15) Ålight pink
V = 288.20 (2) Å3cylinder, 0.5 × 0.5 mm
Z = 1Specimen preparation: Prepared at 293 K
F(000) = 304
Data collection top
MAR345dif
diffractometer
Data collection mode: transmission
Radiation source: synchrotronScan method: step
Specimen mounting: quartz capillary2θmin = 3.883°, 2θmax = 58.870°, 2θstep = 0.020°
Refinement top
Rp = 3.71450 parameters
Rwp = 4.8270 restraints
Rexp = 2.465H-atom parameters not refined
RBragg = 3.948(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
2805 data points
Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/UeqOcc. (<1)
Co10.42427 (12)0.000000.000000.0180 (4)*
Co20.36174 (19)0.2336 (2)0.500000.0328 (7)*0.500
O10.5360 (4)0.2464 (4)0.000000.0278 (9)*
O20.1908 (5)0.1908 (5)0.000000.0278 (9)*
O30.5545 (6)0.000000.500000.0278 (9)*
O40.2852 (7)0.000000.500000.0278 (9)*
C10.666670.333330.000000.0278 (9)*
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Co1—O12.206 (4)Co2—O1iii2.335 (4)
Co1—O32.060 (4)Co2—O22.229 (4)
Co1—O42.121 (5)Co2—O42.130 (2)
Co1—O3i2.060 (4)Co2—O2iii2.229 (4)
Co1—O4i2.121 (5)Co2—O3iv1.908 (6)
Co1—O1ii2.206 (4)O1—C11.189 (4)
Co2—O12.335 (4)
O1—Co1—O392.01 (8)Co2—O2—Co2i88.9 (2)
O1—Co1—O487.92 (8)Co2—O2—Co2v120.7 (2)
O1—Co1—O3i92.01 (8)Co2—O2—Co2vi61.87 (10)
O1—Co1—O4i87.92 (8)Co2i—O2—Co2v61.87 (10)
O1—Co1—O1ii173.9 (2)Co2i—O2—Co2vi120.7 (2)
O3—Co1—O483.34 (19)Co2v—O2—Co2vi88.94 (17)
O3—Co1—O3i98.53 (19)Co1—O3—Co1iii98.5 (3)
O3—Co1—O4i178.1 (2)Co1—O3—Co2vii121.46 (6)
O1ii—Co1—O392.01 (11)Co1—O3—Co2viii121.46 (6)
O3i—Co1—O4178.1 (2)Co1iii—O3—Co2vii121.46 (6)
O4—Co1—O4i94.8 (2)Co1iii—O3—Co2viii121.46 (6)
O1ii—Co1—O487.92 (12)Co2vii—O3—Co2viii73.8 (3)
O3i—Co1—O4i83.34 (19)Co1—O4—Co297.59 (11)
O1ii—Co1—O3i92.01 (11)Co1—O4—Co1iii94.8 (3)
O1ii—Co1—O4i87.92 (12)Co1—O4—Co2ix97.60 (12)
O2—Co2—O488.10 (19)Co1iii—O4—Co297.59 (11)
O2—Co2—O2iii88.94 (17)Co2—O4—Co2ix157.5 (4)
O2—Co2—O3iv95.0 (2)Co1iii—O4—Co2ix97.60 (12)
O2iii—Co2—O488.10 (19)O1—C1—O1x120.0 (4)
O3iv—Co2—O4175.6 (3)O1—C1—O1vii120.0 (3)
O2iii—Co2—O3iv95.0 (2)O1x—C1—O1vii120.0 (4)
Co1—O1—C1127.7 (3)
O3—Co1—O1—C149.31 (13)O3—Co1—O4—Co298.33 (17)
O4—Co1—O1—C1132.56 (15)O2—Co2—O4—Co187.6 (2)
O1—Co1—O4—Co26.07 (19)
Symmetry codes: (i) x, y, z1; (ii) xy, y, z; (iii) x, y, z+1; (iv) x+y+1, x+1, z+1; (v) y, x, z1; (vi) y, x, z; (vii) y+1, xy, z; (viii) x+1, x+y, z; (ix) xy, y, z+1; (x) x+y+1, x+1, z.
Valence bond analysis according to the empirical expression from Brown and Altermatt [Brown, I. D. and Altermatt, D. (1985). Acta Cryst. B41, 244–247], using parameters for solids from Brese and O'Keeffe [Brese, N. E. and O'Keeffe, M. (1991). Acta Cryst. B47, 192–197]. The valence deficit observed for atoms O2, O3 and O4 is expected to be compensated by hydrogen bonding and the water molecule would be preferentially located on the O2 site. top
O1O2O3O4ΣΣ(expected)
Co10.245 × 20.363 × 20.308 × 21.832
× 2× 2
Co20.173 × 20.230 × 20.5470.3011.652
× 2
C11.721 × 35.164
Σ2.140.461.230.92
Σ(expected)2222

Follow Acta Cryst. C
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds