journal menu
inorganic compounds
![[mu]](/logos/entities/mu_rmgif.gif)
2-dicyanamido-dicadmium(II)] dihydrate], {K[Cd2(C2N3)5(H2O)2]·2H2O}n, contains two-dimensional anionic sheets of {[Cd2{N(CN)2}(H2O)2]-}n with a modified (6,3)-net (layer group 
, No. 35). Two sets of equivalent sheets interpenetrate orthogonally to form a tetragonal enmeshed grid.Supporting information
 | Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270107061628/sk3182sup1.cif |
 | Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270107061628/sk3182Isup2.hkl |
For related literature, see: Batten & Murray (2003); Batten & Robson (1998); Biswas et al. (2006); Ding et al. (2006, 2007); Flack (1983); Jürgens et al. (2004); Keler et al. (1974); MacGillivray et al. (1994); Manson (2005); Miller & Manson (2001); Moulton & Zaworotko (2001); Schlueter & Geiser (2007); Sheldrick (2001); Van der Werff et al. (2005); Xu et al. (2004).
KCd2(dca)5(H2O)4 was unexpectedly prepared while following the literature procedure for the synthesis of K4Cd(dca)6 (Keler et al., 1974). Potassium dicyanamide, K(dca), was prepared according to the literature procedure (Van der Werff et al., 2001). Potassium dicyanamide (315 mg, 3 mmol) was then dissolved in methanol (10 ml) and combined with 10 ml of a methanol solution of cadmium nitrate tetrahydrate (154 mg, 0.5 mmol, Acros). The white precipitate of potassium nitrate was removed by filtration and the remaining solution allowed to evaporate slowly until small colorless crystals formed.
The positions of the water H atoms were obtained from a difference map and were refined subject to both an O—H DFIX restraint of 0.82 (3) Å and an H···H DANG restraint of 1.30 Å (SHELXTL; Sheldrick, 2001). All the H-atom Uiso values were constrained to be 1.5 times the Ueq value of the carrier atom. The structure was refined as an inversion twin, where the Flack (1983) parameter corresponds to the volume fraction of one of the twin components.
A growing number of coordination polymers have utilized the dicyanamide pseudohalide anion [N(CN)2-, hereafter abbreviated dca], because its large variety of bonding modes enables the formation of a wide range of structural types (Miller & Manson, 2001; Batten & Murray, 2003; Manson, 2005). The majority of these materials utilize divalent first-row transition elements as the structural nodes that link the dca anion into polymeric motifs. The neutral binary M(dca)2 complexes of the first row elements form rutile-like structures in which dca is coordinated in a µ1,3,5 fashion. Long-range ferromagnetic order is observed in the cobalt, nickel and copper complexes, with antiferromagnetic ordering in the vanadium, chromium, manganese and iron analogs (Manson, 2005).
Among the second-row transition metals, cadmium is the most studied in the area of network polymers. Two polymorphs of the Cd(dca)2 structure are known; the ambient-temperature β-Cd(dca)2 structure transforms into α-Cd(dca)2 at temperatures above 328 K. This α form is isotypic with the rutile-like structures of the first-row transition elements (Jürgens et al., 2004). Novel structural motifs can be achieved through the incorporation of ancillary ligands. For example, the structure of Cd(dca)2(2-aminobenzimidazole) is characterized as a one-dimensional tube-like structure which contains dca anions coordinated in both µ1,3,5 and µ1,5 modes (Ding et al., 2007). Such cadmium-containing compounds have potential application as luminescent materials (Ding et al., 2006, 2007).
More recently, increased emphasis has been placed on the characterization of anionic dca complexes where cation templation enables the assembly of a diverse set of topologies (Schlueter & Geiser, 2007). Through the appropriate choice of cation, one-dimensional chain and ladder-type structures can be assembled. Similarly, square, honeycomb and triangular two-dimensional motifs have been reported. Three-dimensional motifs, including cube, triple rutile and lithium antimonate-types, have been identified. For each of these motifs, the dicyanamide anion is coordinated in a µ1,5 fashion, with the various structural types achieved by varying the ratio and arrangement of single and double dca bridges. Surprisingly, there are no previous structurally characterized examples of anionic dicyanamide coordination polymers that contain alkali metal cations as the charge-compensating and structure-directing entities.
Only two examples of cadmium-based anionic dca structures are known. In the (Et4N)[Cd(dca)3]·0.75H2O structure, two-dimensional sheets with (4,4)-topology are formed. These sheets possess single µ1,5 bridges in one direction and double µ1,5 bridges in the other (Biswas et al., 2006). The [Cp*2Fe][Cd(dca)3] (Cp* is pentamethylcyclopentadienyl) salt contains a three-dimensional cube-type anionic structure with single µ1,5 dca bridges (Van der Werff et al., 2005).
There are no previous examples of published crystal structures that contain both K and dca. Furthermore, although interpenetration is a common phenomenon among coordination polymers (Batten & Robson, 1998), there are also no previous examples of interpenetrated anionic dca lattices. We report that the title compound, KCd2(dca)5(H2O)4, (I), contains orthogonally interpenetrated two-dimensional anionic sheets with a modified (6,3)-net. This new structural motif for anionic dca coordination polymers is perhaps enabled by the templating effects of the octahedrally coordinated potassium cation. The anionic component in the title compound is isotypic with the cationic component of (CuI)2(pyrazine)3(SiF6) (MacGillivray et al., 1994).
The atom-numbering scheme of (I) is illustrated in Fig. 1. The geometry of the dca anions is typical. The nitrile C≡N bond lengths range from 1.127 (4) to 1.145 (2) Å, the amide N—C bond lengths range from 1.277 (3) to 1.298 (2) Å, the C—N—C bond angles are 123.9 (2) and 124.4 (4)°, and the N≡ C—N bond angles range from 171.7 (2) to 174.3 (3)°. The displacement ellipsoids of the amide N atoms are elongated, indicating a rocking thermal motion of the dca anions. The coordination geometry about the CdII center is distorted octahedral (site symmetry m). Within the equatorial plane, the Cd—N bond lengths are 2.339 (2) and 2.355 (2) Å, and the N—Cd—N bond angles range from 89.06 (9) to 91.08 (9)°. A dca anion is also coordinated to the apical position with a slightly shorter Cd—N bond length of 2.221 (2) Å. The sixth coordination site is occupied by a water molecule, with a Cd—O distance of 2.327 (2) Å. This CdII coordination geometry is similar to that observed in Cd(dca)2(bpno)2(H2O) (bpno is 4,4'-bipyridine N,N'-dioxide; Xu et al., 2004). The K+ cation is coordinated by eight dca nitrile N atoms with four K—N1 contacts of 2.978 (2) Å and four K—N2 contacts of 3.077 (2) Å, forming a twisted cube configuration (site symmetry 222).
The CdII cations are joined into polymeric chains through double µ1,5 bridges that lie along the c axis. Along these chains, the Cd.·Cd separation is 7.5856 (3) Å. These bibridged chains are linked into layers through single µ1,5 bridges with Cd···Cd separations of 8.4391 (3) Å. The coordinated water molecule is a terminal ligand and hence, the CdII node is three-connecting. The [Cd2(dca)5(H2O)2]- layers form a (6,3) brick-wall motif (Moulton & Zaworotko, 2001). The Cd···Cd separation through the terminal water molecules is 8.3250 (3) Å, slightly shorter than that through the single dca bridges, resulting in a slight constriction in the center of the bricks. Parallel two-dimensional layers are separated by 8.3822 (1) Å. As illustrated in Fig. 2, equivalent sets of anionic layers lie parallel to both the (110) and the (110) planes, resulting in orthogonal interpenetration. The shortest Cd···Cd separations, 5.8922 (2) and 5.9729 (2) Å, occur between the interpenetrated sheets.
In addition to the water molecule that is coordinated to Cd, a uncoordinated water molecule resides in cavities formed by the interpenetrated structure. Perhaps as a result of a lack of strong hydrogen-bond acceptor sites within this cavity, the uncoordinated water molecule is disordered between two sites. Refinement of the occupancy of these two sites results in an approximately 2:1 preference of the O2 site over O3. Intermolecular hydrogen bonding between water molecules is apparent in the structure. The H1B atomic position on the coordinated water molecule is fully occupied. This H atom forms hydrogen bonds with the O atoms of both locations of the uncoordinated water molecule. By symmetry, atom H1A on the coordinated water molecule is disordered over two sites. This H atom forms a hydrogen bond with the O atom of a structurally equivalent water molecule. The H atoms of the uncoordinated water molecules form additional hydrogen bonds as detailed in Table 2. Impossibly short intermolecular contacts between some of the partially occupied atomic sites imply at least local correlation between disordered components at adjacent sites.
We conclude that alkali metal cations provide a different templating effect for the crystallization of dca-based coordination polymers than has previously been described with organic cations. If similar structures can be crystallized with paramagnetic nodes, a new family of magnetic dca structures may be achieved.
For related literature, see: Batten & Murray (2003); Batten & Robson (1998); Biswas et al. (2006); Ding et al. (2006, 2007); Flack (1983); Jürgens et al. (2004); Keler et al. (1974); MacGillivray et al. (1994); Manson (2005); Miller & Manson (2001); Moulton & Zaworotko (2001); Schlueter & Geiser (2007); Sheldrick (2001); Van der Werff et al. (2005); Xu et al. (2004).
Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 1998); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2001); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2001); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2001); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2001); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2001); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2001) and PLATON (Spek, 2003).
![[Figure 1]](http://journals.iucr.org/c/issues/2008/02/00/sk3182/sk3182fig1thm.gif)
| Fig. 1. The atom-numbering scheme of KCd2(dca)5(H2O)4. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level, and H atoms are shown as small spheres of arbitrary radii. [Symmetry codes: (*) 1 - x, 1 - y, z; (#) y, x, z; (') 1/2 - x, 1/2 - y, 1/2 + z; (") 1/2 - y, 1/2 - x, 1/2 + z; ($) 1/2 - y, -1/2 + x, 1/2 - z; (@) -1/2 + x, 1/2 + y, 1/2 + z.] |
![[Figure 2]](http://journals.iucr.org/c/issues/2008/02/00/sk3182/sk3182fig2thm.gif)
| Fig. 2. Ball-and-stick representation of the orthogonally interpenetrated (6,3)-nets formed by the [Cd2(dca)5(H2O)2]- anions. Two sheets, one parallel to each of the (110) and (110) planes, are illustrated. H atoms have been omitted for clarity. |
| K[Cd2(C2N3)5(H2O)2]·2H2O | Dx = 2.076 Mg m−3 |
| Mr = 666.21 | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
| Tetragonal, I42m | Cell parameters from 1665 reflections |
| Hall symbol: I -4 2 | θ = 3.4–28.3° |
| a = 11.8540 (2) Å | µ = 2.24 mm−1 |
| c = 15.1708 (5) Å | T = 298 K |
| V = 2131.76 (9) Å3 | Block, colorless |
| Z = 4 | 0.42 × 0.40 × 0.22 mm |
| F(000) = 1280 |
| Siemens SMART CCD diffractometer | 1385 independent reflections |
| Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | 1354 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
| Graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.021 |
| area detector ω scans | θmax = 28.3°, θmin = 2.2° |
| Absorption correction: integration (SHELXTL; Sheldrick, 2001) | h = −15→15 |
| Tmin = 0.417, Tmax = 0.624 | k = −15→15 |
| 10190 measured reflections | l = −20→20 |
| Refinement on F2 | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
| Least-squares matrix: full | Only H-atom coordinates refined |
| R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.013 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0131P)2 + 1.3157P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
| wR(F2) = 0.034 | (Δ/σ)max = 0.003 |
| S = 1.12 | Δρmax = 0.31 e Å−3 |
| 1385 reflections | Δρmin = −0.24 e Å−3 |
| 99 parameters | Extinction correction: SHELXL97, Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4 |
| 26 restraints | Extinction coefficient: 0.00718 (16) |
| Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods | Absolute structure: Flack (1983), 588 Friedel pairs |
| Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map | Absolute structure parameter: 0.58 (3) |
| K[Cd2(C2N3)5(H2O)2]·2H2O | Z = 4 |
| Mr = 666.21 | Mo Kα radiation |
| Tetragonal, I42m | µ = 2.24 mm−1 |
| a = 11.8540 (2) Å | T = 298 K |
| c = 15.1708 (5) Å | 0.42 × 0.40 × 0.22 mm |
| V = 2131.76 (9) Å3 |
| Siemens SMART CCD diffractometer | 1385 independent reflections |
| Absorption correction: integration (SHELXTL; Sheldrick, 2001) | 1354 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
| Tmin = 0.417, Tmax = 0.624 | Rint = 0.021 |
| 10190 measured reflections |
| R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.013 | Only H-atom coordinates refined |
| wR(F2) = 0.034 | Δρmax = 0.31 e Å−3 |
| S = 1.12 | Δρmin = −0.24 e Å−3 |
| 1385 reflections | Absolute structure: Flack (1983), 588 Friedel pairs |
| 99 parameters | Absolute structure parameter: 0.58 (3) |
| 26 restraints |
Experimental. The data collection nominally covered over a hemisphere of reciprocal space by a combination of four sets of exposures; each set had a different φ angle for the crystal and each exposure covered 0.3° in ω. The crystal-to-detector distance was 5.037 cm. Coverage of the unique set was 100% complete to at least 26.3° in θ, 98.6% complete to at least 28.2° in θ. |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
| x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | Occ. (<1) | |
| Cd1 | 0.248298 (9) | 0.248298 (9) | 0.508456 (9) | 0.02699 (7) | |
| K1 | 0.5000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.03672 (19) | |
| N1 | 0.37183 (14) | 0.17615 (15) | 0.40227 (11) | 0.0408 (4) | |
| N2 | 0.38654 (14) | 0.18599 (16) | 0.11026 (10) | 0.0427 (4) | |
| N3 | 0.45756 (17) | 0.2127 (2) | 0.25927 (11) | 0.0623 (6) | |
| C1 | 0.40631 (14) | 0.19120 (16) | 0.33274 (11) | 0.0342 (3) | |
| C2 | 0.41333 (14) | 0.19603 (16) | 0.18208 (11) | 0.0344 (4) | |
| N4 | 0.37033 (14) | 0.37033 (14) | 0.56544 (17) | 0.0511 (6) | |
| N5 | 0.5000 | 0.5000 | 0.6327 (3) | 0.107 (3) | |
| C4 | 0.43262 (17) | 0.43262 (17) | 0.59345 (18) | 0.0480 (7) | |
| O1 | 0.11434 (11) | 0.11434 (11) | 0.46825 (13) | 0.0394 (4) | |
| H1A | 0.050 (2) | 0.129 (4) | 0.483 (2) | 0.059* | 0.50 |
| H1B | 0.114 (2) | 0.114 (2) | 0.4152 (12) | 0.059* | |
| O2 | 0.0774 (11) | 0.0774 (11) | 0.3069 (8) | 0.088 (2) | 0.325 (8) |
| H2A | 0.006 (2) | 0.081 (3) | 0.306 (7) | 0.132* | 0.325 (8) |
| O3 | 0.1385 (5) | 0.1385 (5) | 0.2896 (3) | 0.088 (2) | 0.675 (8) |
| H3A | 0.159 (3) | 0.082 (3) | 0.259 (2) | 0.132* | 0.675 (8) |
| U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
| Cd1 | 0.03009 (8) | 0.03009 (8) | 0.02077 (9) | −0.00266 (7) | 0.00116 (4) | 0.00116 (4) |
| K1 | 0.0401 (4) | 0.0375 (4) | 0.0325 (4) | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| N1 | 0.0442 (9) | 0.0501 (10) | 0.0282 (8) | 0.0043 (7) | 0.0066 (7) | 0.0005 (7) |
| N2 | 0.0408 (9) | 0.0587 (10) | 0.0287 (7) | 0.0004 (8) | −0.0057 (6) | 0.0059 (7) |
| N3 | 0.0523 (10) | 0.1107 (17) | 0.0240 (7) | −0.0310 (11) | 0.0004 (7) | 0.0026 (9) |
| C1 | 0.0334 (8) | 0.0412 (9) | 0.0281 (8) | −0.0007 (7) | −0.0016 (7) | −0.0004 (7) |
| C2 | 0.0309 (8) | 0.0436 (9) | 0.0286 (8) | −0.0021 (7) | 0.0019 (6) | 0.0030 (7) |
| N4 | 0.0523 (9) | 0.0523 (9) | 0.0486 (14) | −0.0205 (13) | 0.0003 (7) | 0.0003 (7) |
| N5 | 0.144 (4) | 0.144 (4) | 0.033 (2) | −0.116 (4) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| C4 | 0.0577 (11) | 0.0577 (11) | 0.0286 (12) | −0.0234 (15) | 0.0049 (7) | 0.0049 (7) |
| O1 | 0.0382 (6) | 0.0382 (6) | 0.0416 (10) | −0.0023 (8) | −0.0052 (6) | −0.0052 (6) |
| O2 | 0.108 (3) | 0.108 (3) | 0.047 (2) | 0.058 (3) | −0.029 (3) | −0.029 (3) |
| O3 | 0.108 (3) | 0.108 (3) | 0.047 (2) | 0.058 (3) | −0.029 (3) | −0.029 (3) |
| Cd1—N4 | 2.221 (2) | N3—C1 | 1.295 (2) |
| Cd1—O1 | 2.3270 (19) | N3—C2 | 1.298 (2) |
| Cd1—N1 | 2.3390 (16) | N4—C4 | 1.127 (4) |
| Cd1—N2i | 2.3552 (16) | N5—C4 | 1.277 (3) |
| K1—N1ii | 2.9777 (18) | O1—H1A | 0.810 (18) |
| K1—N2 | 3.0770 (18) | O1—H1B | 0.805 (17) |
| N1—C1 | 1.145 (2) | O2—H2A | 0.85 (2) |
| N2—C2 | 1.141 (2) | O3—H3A | 0.848 (18) |
| N4—Cd1—O1 | 172.29 (8) | N2—K1—N2x | 128.16 (6) |
| N4—Cd1—N1 | 95.65 (7) | C1—N1—Cd1 | 143.21 (16) |
| O1—Cd1—N1 | 89.84 (6) | C1—N1—K1vii | 112.69 (14) |
| O1—Cd1—N2i | 86.24 (6) | Cd1—N1—K1vii | 103.47 (6) |
| N1—Cd1—N1iii | 89.06 (9) | C2—N2—Cd1xi | 141.31 (16) |
| N1—Cd1—N2i | 175.92 (6) | C2—N2—K1 | 118.18 (15) |
| N1—Cd1—N2iv | 89.79 (6) | Cd1xi—N2—K1 | 100.20 (5) |
| N2iv—Cd1—N2i | 91.08 (9) | C1—N3—C2 | 123.86 (18) |
| N4—Cd1—N2i | 88.36 (6) | N1—C1—N3 | 172.3 (2) |
| N1ii—K1—N1v | 90.95 (7) | N2—C2—N3 | 171.7 (2) |
| N1ii—K1—N1vi | 118.64 (7) | C4—N4—Cd1 | 179.2 (3) |
| N1ii—K1—N1vii | 120.27 (6) | C4xii—N5—C4 | 124.4 (4) |
| N1ii—K1—N2viii | 66.33 (4) | N4—C4—N5 | 174.3 (3) |
| N1ii—K1—N2 | 70.74 (5) | Cd1—O1—H1A | 115 (3) |
| N1ii—K1—N2ix | 77.78 (5) | Cd1—O1—H1B | 106 (3) |
| N1ii—K1—N2x | 160.53 (5) | H1A—O1—H1B | 105 (3) |
| N2—K1—N2viii | 88.46 (6) | H2A—O2—H3A | 142 (8) |
| N2—K1—N2ix | 114.14 (6) |
| Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1/2, −y+1/2, z+1/2; (ii) y+1/2, −x+1/2, −z+1/2; (iii) y, x, z; (iv) −y+1/2, −x+1/2, z+1/2; (v) y+1/2, x−1/2, z−1/2; (vi) −y+1/2, −x+1/2, z−1/2; (vii) −y+1/2, x−1/2, −z+1/2; (viii) −x+1, y, −z; (ix) −x+1, −y, z; (x) x, −y, −z; (xi) −x+1/2, −y+1/2, z−1/2; (xii) −x+1, −y+1, z. |
| D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
| O1—H1A···O1xiii | 0.81 (2) | 2.10 (2) | 2.877 (3) | 162 (5) |
| O1—H1B···O2 | 0.81 (2) | 1.76 (2) | 2.526 (10) | 160 (4) |
| O1—H1B···O3 | 0.81 (2) | 1.95 (2) | 2.740 (6) | 168 (4) |
| O2—H2A···O2xiv | 0.85 (2) | 2.12 (5) | 2.59 (4) | 115 (3) |
| O3—H3A···N3vii | 0.85 (2) | 2.14 (2) | 2.875 (2) | 145 (3) |
| Symmetry codes: (vii) −y+1/2, x−1/2, −z+1/2; (xiii) −x, y, −z+1; (xiv) −x, −y, z. |
Experimental details
| Crystal data | |
| Chemical formula | K[Cd2(C2N3)5(H2O)2]·2H2O |
| Mr | 666.21 |
| Crystal system, space group | Tetragonal, I42m |
| Temperature (K) | 298 |
| a, c (Å) | 11.8540 (2), 15.1708 (5) |
| V (Å3) | 2131.76 (9) |
| Z | 4 |
| Radiation type | Mo Kα |
| µ (mm−1) | 2.24 |
| Crystal size (mm) | 0.42 × 0.40 × 0.22 |
| Data collection | |
| Diffractometer | Siemens SMART CCD |
| Absorption correction | Integration (SHELXTL; Sheldrick, 2001) |
| Tmin, Tmax | 0.417, 0.624 |
| No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections | 10190, 1385, 1354 |
| Rint | 0.021 |
| (sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.666 |
| Refinement | |
| R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.013, 0.034, 1.12 |
| No. of reflections | 1385 |
| No. of parameters | 99 |
| No. of restraints | 26 |
| H-atom treatment | Only H-atom coordinates refined |
| Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 0.31, −0.24 |
| Absolute structure | Flack (1983), 588 Friedel pairs |
| Absolute structure parameter | 0.58 (3) |
Computer programs: SMART (Bruker, 1998), SAINT (Bruker, 2001), SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2001) and PLATON (Spek, 2003).
| Cd1—N4 | 2.221 (2) | Cd1—N1 | 2.3390 (16) |
| Cd1—O1 | 2.3270 (19) | Cd1—N2i | 2.3552 (16) |
| N4—Cd1—O1 | 172.29 (8) | N1—Cd1—N2iii | 89.79 (6) |
| N4—Cd1—N1 | 95.65 (7) | N2iii—Cd1—N2i | 91.08 (9) |
| O1—Cd1—N1 | 89.84 (6) | N4—Cd1—N2i | 88.36 (6) |
| O1—Cd1—N2i | 86.24 (6) | C1—N1—Cd1 | 143.21 (16) |
| N1—Cd1—N1ii | 89.06 (9) | C2—N2—Cd1iv | 141.31 (16) |
| N1—Cd1—N2i | 175.92 (6) | C4—N4—Cd1 | 179.2 (3) |
| Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1/2, −y+1/2, z+1/2; (ii) y, x, z; (iii) −y+1/2, −x+1/2, z+1/2; (iv) −x+1/2, −y+1/2, z−1/2. |
| D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
| O1—H1A···O1v | 0.810 (18) | 2.10 (2) | 2.877 (3) | 162 (5) |
| O1—H1B···O2 | 0.805 (17) | 1.76 (2) | 2.526 (10) | 160 (4) |
| O1—H1B···O3 | 0.805 (17) | 1.948 (19) | 2.740 (6) | 168 (4) |
| O2—H2A···O2vi | 0.85 (2) | 2.12 (5) | 2.59 (4) | 115 (3) |
| O3—H3A···N3vii | 0.848 (18) | 2.139 (17) | 2.875 (2) | 145 (3) |
| Symmetry codes: (v) −x, y, −z+1; (vi) −x, −y, z; (vii) −y+1/2, x−1/2, −z+1/2. |
Subscribe to Acta Crystallographica Section C: Structural Chemistry
Subscribe to Acta Crystallographica Section C: Structural ChemistryThe full text of this article is available to subscribers to the journal.
- Information on subscribing
- Sample issue
- Purchase subscription
- Reduced-price subscriptions
- If you have already subscribed, you may need to register
A growing number of coordination polymers have utilized the dicyanamide pseudohalide anion [N(CN)2-, hereafter abbreviated dca], because its large variety of bonding modes enables the formation of a wide range of structural types (Miller & Manson, 2001; Batten & Murray, 2003; Manson, 2005). The majority of these materials utilize divalent first-row transition elements as the structural nodes that link the dca anion into polymeric motifs. The neutral binary M(dca)2 complexes of the first row elements form rutile-like structures in which dca is coordinated in a µ1,3,5 fashion. Long-range ferromagnetic order is observed in the cobalt, nickel and copper complexes, with antiferromagnetic ordering in the vanadium, chromium, manganese and iron analogs (Manson, 2005).
Among the second-row transition metals, cadmium is the most studied in the area of network polymers. Two polymorphs of the Cd(dca)2 structure are known; the ambient-temperature β-Cd(dca)2 structure transforms into α-Cd(dca)2 at temperatures above 328 K. This α form is isotypic with the rutile-like structures of the first-row transition elements (Jürgens et al., 2004). Novel structural motifs can be achieved through the incorporation of ancillary ligands. For example, the structure of Cd(dca)2(2-aminobenzimidazole) is characterized as a one-dimensional tube-like structure which contains dca anions coordinated in both µ1,3,5 and µ1,5 modes (Ding et al., 2007). Such cadmium-containing compounds have potential application as luminescent materials (Ding et al., 2006, 2007).
More recently, increased emphasis has been placed on the characterization of anionic dca complexes where cation templation enables the assembly of a diverse set of topologies (Schlueter & Geiser, 2007). Through the appropriate choice of cation, one-dimensional chain and ladder-type structures can be assembled. Similarly, square, honeycomb and triangular two-dimensional motifs have been reported. Three-dimensional motifs, including cube, triple rutile and lithium antimonate-types, have been identified. For each of these motifs, the dicyanamide anion is coordinated in a µ1,5 fashion, with the various structural types achieved by varying the ratio and arrangement of single and double dca bridges. Surprisingly, there are no previous structurally characterized examples of anionic dicyanamide coordination polymers that contain alkali metal cations as the charge-compensating and structure-directing entities.
Only two examples of cadmium-based anionic dca structures are known. In the (Et4N)[Cd(dca)3]·0.75H2O structure, two-dimensional sheets with (4,4)-topology are formed. These sheets possess single µ1,5 bridges in one direction and double µ1,5 bridges in the other (Biswas et al., 2006). The [Cp*2Fe][Cd(dca)3] (Cp* is pentamethylcyclopentadienyl) salt contains a three-dimensional cube-type anionic structure with single µ1,5 dca bridges (Van der Werff et al., 2005).
There are no previous examples of published crystal structures that contain both K and dca. Furthermore, although interpenetration is a common phenomenon among coordination polymers (Batten & Robson, 1998), there are also no previous examples of interpenetrated anionic dca lattices. We report that the title compound, KCd2(dca)5(H2O)4, (I), contains orthogonally interpenetrated two-dimensional anionic sheets with a modified (6,3)-net. This new structural motif for anionic dca coordination polymers is perhaps enabled by the templating effects of the octahedrally coordinated potassium cation. The anionic component in the title compound is isotypic with the cationic component of (CuI)2(pyrazine)3(SiF6) (MacGillivray et al., 1994).
The atom-numbering scheme of (I) is illustrated in Fig. 1. The geometry of the dca anions is typical. The nitrile C≡N bond lengths range from 1.127 (4) to 1.145 (2) Å, the amide N—C bond lengths range from 1.277 (3) to 1.298 (2) Å, the C—N—C bond angles are 123.9 (2) and 124.4 (4)°, and the N≡ C—N bond angles range from 171.7 (2) to 174.3 (3)°. The displacement ellipsoids of the amide N atoms are elongated, indicating a rocking thermal motion of the dca anions. The coordination geometry about the CdII center is distorted octahedral (site symmetry m). Within the equatorial plane, the Cd—N bond lengths are 2.339 (2) and 2.355 (2) Å, and the N—Cd—N bond angles range from 89.06 (9) to 91.08 (9)°. A dca anion is also coordinated to the apical position with a slightly shorter Cd—N bond length of 2.221 (2) Å. The sixth coordination site is occupied by a water molecule, with a Cd—O distance of 2.327 (2) Å. This CdII coordination geometry is similar to that observed in Cd(dca)2(bpno)2(H2O) (bpno is 4,4'-bipyridine N,N'-dioxide; Xu et al., 2004). The K+ cation is coordinated by eight dca nitrile N atoms with four K—N1 contacts of 2.978 (2) Å and four K—N2 contacts of 3.077 (2) Å, forming a twisted cube configuration (site symmetry 222).
The CdII cations are joined into polymeric chains through double µ1,5 bridges that lie along the c axis. Along these chains, the Cd.·Cd separation is 7.5856 (3) Å. These bibridged chains are linked into layers through single µ1,5 bridges with Cd···Cd separations of 8.4391 (3) Å. The coordinated water molecule is a terminal ligand and hence, the CdII node is three-connecting. The [Cd2(dca)5(H2O)2]- layers form a (6,3) brick-wall motif (Moulton & Zaworotko, 2001). The Cd···Cd separation through the terminal water molecules is 8.3250 (3) Å, slightly shorter than that through the single dca bridges, resulting in a slight constriction in the center of the bricks. Parallel two-dimensional layers are separated by 8.3822 (1) Å. As illustrated in Fig. 2, equivalent sets of anionic layers lie parallel to both the (110) and the (110) planes, resulting in orthogonal interpenetration. The shortest Cd···Cd separations, 5.8922 (2) and 5.9729 (2) Å, occur between the interpenetrated sheets.
In addition to the water molecule that is coordinated to Cd, a uncoordinated water molecule resides in cavities formed by the interpenetrated structure. Perhaps as a result of a lack of strong hydrogen-bond acceptor sites within this cavity, the uncoordinated water molecule is disordered between two sites. Refinement of the occupancy of these two sites results in an approximately 2:1 preference of the O2 site over O3. Intermolecular hydrogen bonding between water molecules is apparent in the structure. The H1B atomic position on the coordinated water molecule is fully occupied. This H atom forms hydrogen bonds with the O atoms of both locations of the uncoordinated water molecule. By symmetry, atom H1A on the coordinated water molecule is disordered over two sites. This H atom forms a hydrogen bond with the O atom of a structurally equivalent water molecule. The H atoms of the uncoordinated water molecules form additional hydrogen bonds as detailed in Table 2. Impossibly short intermolecular contacts between some of the partially occupied atomic sites imply at least local correlation between disordered components at adjacent sites.
We conclude that alkali metal cations provide a different templating effect for the crystallization of dca-based coordination polymers than has previously been described with organic cations. If similar structures can be crystallized with paramagnetic nodes, a new family of magnetic dca structures may be achieved.