Buy article online - an online subscription or single-article purchase is required to access this article.
Download citation
Download citation
link to html
Crystals of the title compound, di­aqua­hexa-[mu]-cyano-ferrate(III)­praseo­dym­ium(III) dihydrate, Pr[Fe(CN)6]·4H2O or [PrFe(CN)6(H2O)2]·2H2O, are twinned with three components. The Pr atom is coordinated by eight atoms, viz. six N and two symmetry-related water O atoms. The Pr polyhedron (Pr has site symmetry m2m, Wyckoff position 4c) is linked to an FeC6 octahedron (Fe located on a site with imposed 2/m symmetry, Wyckoff position 4b) through N atoms, forming an infinite array. The second (symmetry independent) water mol­ecule lies on a mirror plane, is not included in coordination and is weakly hydrogen bonded to N atoms.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S010827010402092X/sk1764sup1.cif
Contains datablocks I, global

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S010827010402092X/sk1764Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

Comment top

The crystal structures of Pr[Fe(CN)6]·5H2O and Nd[Fe(CN)6]·5H2O solved in hexagonal cells (P63/m) have been reported (Wang et al., 1999) to contain a water molecule with C2v symmetry located on a threefold axis. Such an arrangement is rather unusual and implies a disorder of H atoms. A very similar hexagonal structure has been found for a related compound, Pr[Co(CN)6]·5H2O, by Yukawa et al. (1996). For Nd[Co(CN)6]·5H2O, however, the same authors reported the non-centrosymmetric orthorhombic space group C2221, even though the structures were expected to be similar.

In contrast with pentahydrates, the structures of tetrahydrates have usually been described in the orthorhombic space group Cmcm, where no such possible conflict between molecular and crystal symmetry is possible. Such structures are Er[Fe(CN)6]·4H2O (Mullica et al., 1989; Marsh, 1989; Gramlich et al., 1990), Gd[Fe(CN)6]·4H2O (Mullica & Sappenfield, 1991), Nd[Co(CN)6]·4H2O (Mullica et al., 1996), Sm[Fe(CN)6]·4H2O and Sm[Co(CN)6]·4H2O (Mullica & Sappenfield, 1989), and Bi[Fe(CN)6]·4H2O and Bi[Co(CN)6]·4H2O (Petter & Gramlich, 1990). The only exception was the structure of La[Fe(CN)6]·4H2O (Mullica et al., 1980), which was reported, like La[Fe(CN)6]·5H2O (Bailey et al., 1973), to be hexagonal, space group P63/m.

The diffraction data of the title compound were first processed as orthorhombic C-centred, with Rsym = 0.076 before an absorption correction, which is quite acceptable for a crystal containing a heavy atom. However, when evaluating the data, the mean value of Σ(E2-1) was observed to be rather low, 0.539 [expected value 0.968 for centrosymmetric and 0.736 for non-centrosymmetric space groups (Wilson, 1985)]. This is usually an indicator of twinned crystals (Herbst-Irmer & Sheldrick, 1998). In attempting to solve the structure in the orthorhombic system, the best result that could be achieved was in space group Cmc21 (No.36), with R = 0.151 on observed data and large residuals on the difference Fourier synthesis (14 and −17 e Å−3).

As the data indicated a pseudohexagonal symmetry with Rsym = 0.164, an attempt was made to solve the structure in space group P63 (No. 173). The best result achieved gave R = 0.213, and again large residuals were found on the difference Fourier synthesis (6 and −9 e Å−3). Therefore, it was decided to use the hexagonal cell to solve the structure in the monoclinic system, space group P21 (No. 4). Even though the structure could be `seen', the refinement was unsuccessful until the introduction of a twinning law (TWIN 0 0 1 0 1 0 − 1 0 − 1 3) for a twinned crystal with three components. The refinement was than satisfactory, with R = 0.024 and acceptable residuals on the difference Fourier synthesis (0.7 and −1.5 e Å−3). At this stage, the analysis of the resulting structure by PLATON (Spek, 2001) clearly indicated the centrosymmetric space group Cmcm (No. 63). To complete the refinement in the Cmcm space group the twinning law had to be reformulated as TWIN −0.5 0.5 0 − 1.5 − 0.5 0 0 0 1 3. The volume fractions of the twin refined to 0.580 (2), 0.210 (1) and 0.210 (2).

The crystal structure of Pr[Fe(CN)]6·4H2O consists of [Fe(CN)6] octahedra, the N atoms of which also coordinate Pr atoms (Fig. 1). The polyhedron around the Pr atoms is completed by two water molecules (O2). The N atoms formally provide links between these two polyhedra, forming an infinite array (Fig. 2). The second water molecule (O1), as well as bonding to O2, also bonds weakly to three N atoms through hydrogen bonds, with atom H12 forming a symmetrical bifurcated bridge (Fig. 3).

The discrepancy between the expected and observed chemical composition can be best explained by the fact that at least a part of the batch of crystals dehydrated by losing a water molecule, and thus a more stable tetrahydrate was formed. Such a process has also been reported previously for metastable Nd[Co(CN)6]·5H2O and Pr[Co(CN)6]·5H2O (Yukawa et al., 1996).

Experimental top

Potassium hexacyanoferrate(III), K3[Fe(CN)6], was purchased from Waco pure Chemical Ltd., and praseodymium nitrate hexahydrate, Pr(NO3)3·6H2O, from Shin-etu Chemical Co. The complex praseodymium hexacyanoferrate(III) pentahydrate, Pr[Fe(CN)6]·5H2O, was prepared by adding equimolar quantities of an aqueous solution of K3[Fe(CN)6] (0.25 M) to a solution of Pr(NO3)3·6H2O (0.25 M). Single crystals of Pr[Fe(CN)]6·4H2O were obtained from the mixture by keeping it at room temperature for several days. Although the synthesis was conducted to provide the pentahydrate, the analysed crystal turned to be the tetrahydrate.

Refinement top

H atoms were refined isotropically with a common atomic displacement factor of 0.059 (9) and with O—H distances restrained to 0.82 (2) Å. Please check added text.

Computing details top

Data collection: SMART (Siemens, 1995); cell refinement: SAINT (Siemens, 1995); data reduction: SAINT and SADABS (Sheldrick, 2002); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1990); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL (Bruker, 2001); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2001); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL.

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. A view of the structure of Pr[Fe(CN)]6·4H2O, with displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level. [Symmetry codes: (i) −x, y, 1/2 − z; (ii) −x, y, z; (iii) x, y, 1/2 − z; (iv) −x, 1 − y, 1 − z; (v) x, 1 − y, 1 − z; (vi) 1/2 − x, 1/2 − y, 1 − z.]
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. The structure of Pr[Fe(CN)]6·4H2O viewed along the a axis. Large spheres represent Pr atoms coordinated by N atoms and two molecules of water (O2). FeC6 octahedra are pictured as dark.
[Figure 3] Fig. 3. The hydrogen-bonding pattern in Pr[Fe(CN)]6·4H2O (dashed lines). Symmetry codes and further details are given in Table 2.
Diaquahexa-µ-cyano-ferrate(III)praseodymium(III) dihydrate top
Crystal data top
[PrFe(CN)6(H2O)2]·H2OF(000) = 812
Mr = 424.94Dx = 2.113 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, CmcmMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -C 2c 2Cell parameters from 8192 reflections
a = 7.4920 (1) Åθ = 1.5–33.1°
b = 12.9293 (1) ŵ = 4.71 mm1
c = 13.7904 (1) ÅT = 173 K
V = 1335.83 (2) Å3Irregular plate, dark red
Z = 40.05 × 0.04 × 0.02 mm
Data collection top
Siemens SMART 1K CCD area-detector
diffractometer
1408 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1388 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.062
ω scansθmax = 33.1°, θmin = 1.5°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 2002)
h = 1111
Tmin = 0.816, Tmax = 0.929k = 1919
12392 measured reflectionsl = 2020
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.017Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.039Only H-atom coordinates refined
S = 1.02 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0233P)2]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1408 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
61 parametersΔρmax = 0.52 e Å3
3 restraintsΔρmin = 1.30 e Å3
Crystal data top
[PrFe(CN)6(H2O)2]·H2OV = 1335.83 (2) Å3
Mr = 424.94Z = 4
Orthorhombic, CmcmMo Kα radiation
a = 7.4920 (1) ŵ = 4.71 mm1
b = 12.9293 (1) ÅT = 173 K
c = 13.7904 (1) Å0.05 × 0.04 × 0.02 mm
Data collection top
Siemens SMART 1K CCD area-detector
diffractometer
1408 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 2002)
1388 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.816, Tmax = 0.929Rint = 0.062
12392 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0173 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.039Only H-atom coordinates refined
S = 1.02Δρmax = 0.52 e Å3
1408 reflectionsΔρmin = 1.30 e Å3
61 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Pr10.00000.177159 (15)0.25000.00780 (5)
Fe10.00000.50000.50000.00721 (9)
O10.50000.34575 (19)0.39831 (16)0.0226 (4)
O20.2628 (4)0.2885 (2)0.25000.0243 (6)
N10.2034 (3)0.07313 (15)0.36094 (14)0.0188 (4)
N20.00000.2822 (2)0.4084 (2)0.0168 (6)
C10.1840 (3)0.45482 (16)0.58811 (14)0.0119 (4)
C20.00000.3637 (2)0.4434 (2)0.0123 (5)
H110.50000.317 (4)0.452 (2)0.059 (9)*
H120.50000.4093 (16)0.407 (4)0.059 (9)*
H20.321 (5)0.299 (3)0.2992 (19)0.059 (9)*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Pr10.00740 (10)0.00826 (10)0.00773 (7)0.0000.0000.000
Fe10.0069 (2)0.0074 (3)0.00737 (18)0.0000.0000.00050 (17)
O10.0283 (16)0.0215 (13)0.0180 (8)0.0000.0000.0012 (7)
O20.0178 (12)0.0359 (14)0.0193 (11)0.0161 (10)0.0000.000
N10.0182 (10)0.0218 (8)0.0163 (8)0.0049 (7)0.0022 (7)0.0024 (7)
N20.0184 (15)0.0155 (13)0.0165 (13)0.0000.0000.0029 (10)
C10.0132 (9)0.0111 (8)0.0115 (8)0.0005 (7)0.0014 (7)0.0012 (7)
C20.0118 (13)0.0129 (12)0.0121 (12)0.0000.0000.0008 (11)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Pr1—O2i2.439 (2)Fe1—C11.928 (2)
Pr1—O22.439 (2)Fe1—C1iv1.928 (2)
Pr1—N1i2.5438 (18)Fe1—C1v1.928 (2)
Pr1—N1ii2.5438 (18)Fe1—C1ii1.928 (2)
Pr1—N1iii2.5438 (18)O1—H110.834 (19)
Pr1—N12.5438 (18)O1—H120.830 (19)
Pr1—N2iii2.572 (3)O2—H20.817 (18)
Pr1—N22.572 (3)N1—C1vi1.156 (3)
Fe1—C2iv1.928 (3)N2—C21.159 (4)
Fe1—C21.928 (3)C1—N1vi1.156 (3)
O2i—Pr1—O2107.67 (15)N1iii—Pr1—N2142.18 (5)
O2i—Pr1—N1i80.13 (8)N1—Pr1—N276.61 (7)
O2—Pr1—N1i142.71 (4)N2iii—Pr1—N2116.25 (14)
O2i—Pr1—N1ii80.13 (8)C2iv—Fe1—C2180.0
O2—Pr1—N1ii142.71 (4)C2iv—Fe1—C191.25 (9)
N1i—Pr1—N1ii73.95 (8)C2—Fe1—C188.75 (9)
O2i—Pr1—N1iii142.71 (4)C2iv—Fe1—C1iv88.75 (9)
O2—Pr1—N1iii80.13 (8)C2—Fe1—C1iv91.25 (9)
N1i—Pr1—N1iii73.59 (9)C1—Fe1—C1iv180.0
N1ii—Pr1—N1iii116.16 (10)C2iv—Fe1—C1v88.75 (9)
O2i—Pr1—N1142.71 (4)C2—Fe1—C1v91.25 (9)
O2—Pr1—N180.13 (8)C1—Fe1—C1v88.73 (13)
N1i—Pr1—N1116.16 (10)C1iv—Fe1—C1v91.27 (12)
N1ii—Pr1—N173.58 (10)C2iv—Fe1—C1ii91.25 (9)
N1iii—Pr1—N173.95 (8)C2—Fe1—C1ii88.74 (9)
O2i—Pr1—N2iii71.84 (5)C1—Fe1—C1ii91.27 (13)
O2—Pr1—N2iii71.84 (5)C1iv—Fe1—C1ii88.73 (13)
N1i—Pr1—N2iii76.61 (7)C1v—Fe1—C1ii180.0
N1ii—Pr1—N2iii142.18 (5)H11—O1—H12108 (5)
N1iii—Pr1—N2iii76.61 (7)Pr1—O2—H2122 (3)
N1—Pr1—N2iii142.18 (5)C1vi—N1—Pr1165.47 (19)
O2i—Pr1—N271.84 (5)C2—N2—Pr1146.5 (3)
O2—Pr1—N271.84 (5)N1vi—C1—Fe1178.35 (19)
N1i—Pr1—N2142.18 (5)N2—C2—Fe1179.3 (3)
N1ii—Pr1—N276.61 (7)
O2i—Pr1—N1—C1vi91.4 (7)O2i—Pr1—N2—C258.17 (7)
O2—Pr1—N1—C1vi14.8 (7)O2—Pr1—N2—C258.17 (7)
N1i—Pr1—N1—C1vi159.3 (7)N1i—Pr1—N2—C2102.38 (12)
N1ii—Pr1—N1—C1vi138.4 (6)N1ii—Pr1—N2—C2142.00 (5)
N1iii—Pr1—N1—C1vi97.3 (7)N1iii—Pr1—N2—C2102.38 (12)
N2iii—Pr1—N1—C1vi57.1 (7)N1—Pr1—N2—C2142.00 (5)
N2—Pr1—N1—C1vi58.7 (7)N2iii—Pr1—N2—C20.000 (1)
Symmetry codes: (i) x, y, z+1/2; (ii) x, y, z; (iii) x, y, z+1/2; (iv) x, y+1, z+1; (v) x, y+1, z+1; (vi) x+1/2, y+1/2, z+1.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1—H11···N2vii0.83 (3)2.31 (4)3.137 (4)173 (5)
O1—H12···N1viii0.83 (2)2.69 (2)3.351 (3)138 (2)
O2—H2···O10.82 (3)2.01 (3)2.809 (2)166 (3)
Symmetry codes: (vii) x+1/2, y+1/2, z+1; (viii) x+1/2, y+1/2, z.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula[PrFe(CN)6(H2O)2]·H2O
Mr424.94
Crystal system, space groupOrthorhombic, Cmcm
Temperature (K)173
a, b, c (Å)7.4920 (1), 12.9293 (1), 13.7904 (1)
V3)1335.83 (2)
Z4
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)4.71
Crystal size (mm)0.05 × 0.04 × 0.02
Data collection
DiffractometerSiemens SMART 1K CCD area-detector
diffractometer
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 2002)
Tmin, Tmax0.816, 0.929
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
12392, 1408, 1388
Rint0.062
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.769
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.017, 0.039, 1.02
No. of reflections1408
No. of parameters61
No. of restraints3
H-atom treatmentOnly H-atom coordinates refined
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.52, 1.30

Computer programs: SMART (Siemens, 1995), SAINT (Siemens, 1995), SAINT and SADABS (Sheldrick, 2002), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1990), SHELXTL (Bruker, 2001), DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2001), SHELXTL.

Selected bond lengths (Å) top
Pr1—O2i2.439 (2)Fe1—C21.928 (3)
Pr1—O22.439 (2)Fe1—C11.928 (2)
Pr1—N1i2.5438 (18)Fe1—C1iv1.928 (2)
Pr1—N1ii2.5438 (18)Fe1—C1v1.928 (2)
Pr1—N1iii2.5438 (18)Fe1—C1ii1.928 (2)
Pr1—N12.5438 (18)N1—C1vi1.156 (3)
Pr1—N2iii2.572 (3)N2—C21.159 (4)
Pr1—N22.572 (3)C1—N1vi1.156 (3)
Fe1—C2iv1.928 (3)
Symmetry codes: (i) x, y, z+1/2; (ii) x, y, z; (iii) x, y, z+1/2; (iv) x, y+1, z+1; (v) x, y+1, z+1; (vi) x+1/2, y+1/2, z+1.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1—H11···N2vii0.83 (3)2.31 (4)3.137 (4)173 (5)
O1—H12···N1viii0.83 (2)2.69 (2)3.351 (3)138 (2)
O2—H2···O10.82 (3)2.01 (3)2.809 (2)166 (3)
Symmetry codes: (vii) x+1/2, y+1/2, z+1; (viii) x+1/2, y+1/2, z.
 

Subscribe to Acta Crystallographica Section C: Structural Chemistry

The full text of this article is available to subscribers to the journal.

If you have already registered and are using a computer listed in your registration details, please email support@iucr.org for assistance.

Buy online

You may purchase this article in PDF and/or HTML formats. For purchasers in the European Community who do not have a VAT number, VAT will be added at the local rate. Payments to the IUCr are handled by WorldPay, who will accept payment by credit card in several currencies. To purchase the article, please complete the form below (fields marked * are required), and then click on `Continue'.
E-mail address* 
Repeat e-mail address* 
(for error checking) 

Format*   PDF (US $40)
   HTML (US $40)
   PDF+HTML (US $50)
In order for VAT to be shown for your country javascript needs to be enabled.

VAT number 
(non-UK EC countries only) 
Country* 
 

Terms and conditions of use
Contact us

Follow Acta Cryst. C
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds