Download citation
Download citation
link to html
Crystals of the 1-chloro­anthracene photodimer, viz. trans-bi(1-chloro-9,10-di­hydro-9,10-anthracenediyl), C28H18Cl2, were obtained from the solid-state [4+4]-photodimerization of the monomer, C14H9Cl, followed by recrystallization. The symmetry of the product mol­ecules is defined by the orientation of the reactant mol­ecules in the crystal. The mutual orientation parameters calculated for adjacent monomers explain the reactivity of the compound. The mol­ecules in the crystal of the monomer and the recrystallized photodimer pack differently and the photodimer has crystallographically imposed inversion symmetry.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270103026775/sk1681sup1.cif
Contains datablocks I, II, global

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270103026775/sk1681Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270103026775/sk1681IIsup3.hkl
Contains datablock II

CCDC references: 212360; 212361

Comment top

Crystallographic structural studies of [4 + 4] photodimerization in crystals have in most cases been limited to analyses of the crystal structure of the reactant (Bart & Schmidt, 1971; Heller & Schmidt, 1971; Ihmels et al., 1999, 2000; Wang & Jones, 1987, 1994). The structures of the photodimers are also known, but usually the photodimerization was carried out in solution (Abboud et al., 1990; Becker et al., 1988; Langer & Becker, 1993a,b,c,d; Ojima et al., 2000; Peters et al., 2000; Sinha et al., 1991; Sundell & Becker, 1994) and seldom in crystals (Chandross & Ferguson, 1966; Craig & Sarti-Fantoni, 1966; Dougherty et al., 1986; Ehrenberg, 1966, 1968; Harada et al., 1995, 1996; Wada & Tanaka, 1977). [4 + 4] photodimerization of the single-crystal-to-single-crystal type is very rare (Craig & Sarti-Fantoni, 1966; Dougherty et al., 1986; Ehrenberg, 1966, 1968; Harada et al., 1995; Wada & Tanaka, 1977).

Recently, the crystal structure changes monitored step-by-step during [2 + 2] photodimerization (Turowska-Tyrk, 2001, 2003), [4 + 4] photodimerization (Turowska-Tyrk & Trzop, 2003), thermal isomerization (Bogadi et al., 2002), [4 + 2] dimerization (Kim, Hubig et al., 2001; Kim, Lindeman et al., 2001) and polymerization (Foley et al., 1999) have been described. In this part of our series, we will analyze the structures of the reactant, (I), and product, (II), of the [4 + 4] photodimerization of 1-chloroanthracene in crystals. The possibility of such photodimerization in the solid state was stated by Heller & Schmidt (1971). Unfortunately, the reaction cannot be conducted in the single-crystal-to-single-crystal manner. Although we undertook many trials using different wavelengths, always on the monomer low-energy absorption tail (Enkelmann et al., 1993; Novak et al., 1993a,b), the crystals collapsed into microcrystalline material. \sch

Figs. 1 and 2 show views of the molecules and fragments of the crystal lattices for the reactant, (I), and the product, (II), respectively. The product molecule has a characteristic shape of two united butterflies related by an inversion centre. The adjacent reactant molecules have the same orientation in the crystal. The central bonds formed between the two moieties of the dimer are elongated (Table 1), and this is also observed for photoproducts of other anthracenes. It is worth adding that there are known examples of [4 + 4] photodimerization when, although the monomers were situated head-to-head in the crystal, the dimers obtained by single-crystal-to-single-crystal photoreaction had head-to-tail symmetry (Craig & Sarti-Fantoni, 1966; Ehrenberg, 1968; Kaupp, 1993). A very interesting explanation of this phenomenon was given by Kaupp (1993).

The mutual orientation of adjacent monomer molecules in a crystal is one of the factors influencing [4 + 4] photodimerization (Bart & Schmidt, 1971; Heller & Schmidt, 1971; Ihmels et al., 1999, 2000; Wang & Jones, 1987, 1994). This orientation can be described by the following five parameters (Ihmels et al., 2000; Turowska-Tyrk & Trzop, 2003; Wang & Jones, 1994): α, the C9···C10···C9i and C10···C9···C10i angles, τ, the C9···C10···C9i···C10i and C10···C9···C10i···C9i torsion angles, ϕ, the dihedral angle between the cantral rings of adjacent monomers, κ, the angle between the central ring of the parent monomer molecule and the plane formed by the atoms C9, C10, C9i and C10i, and di, the C9···C10i and C10···C9i distances [symmetry code: (i)]. The ideal values for these are 90°, 0°, 0°, 90° and less than 4.2 Å, respectively. The parameters are 98.21 (8), 0, 0 and 67.86 (8)° and 3.760 (3) Å, respectively, for (I), and 108.2, 0, 0 and 74.3° and 3.859 Å for 9-methylanthracene (Turowska-Tyrk & Trzop, 2003). Please make sure the parameters are in the same order as the definitions. These values explain the reactivity of both compounds.

There are also differences between (I) and 9-methylanthracene. The reactant and recrystallized product crystals of the former belong to different space groups, namely P21/c and C2/c, respectively. The a cell constant is doubled in the product. Moreover, comparison of Figs. 1 and 2 shows that, although the orientation of the upper molecules (A and B pairs) is similar, the orientation of the bottom ones (C and D pairs) is very different for the reactant and the product. This might be the reason why the photoreaction is accompanied by crystal disintegration, making the monitoring of structural changes by means of X-ray structure analysis impossible. We succeeded in carrying out such monitoring in the case of 9-methylanthracene, although only to about 30% reaction progress (Turowska-Tyrk & Trzop, 2003). In the case of 9-methylanthracene, the space group was the same (P21/c) and the cell constants and crystal packing more similar for the reactant and the recrystallized photoproduct crystals.

Experimental top

Crystals of 1-chloroathracene monomer, (I), were obtained by crystallization from a mixture of acetone and cyclohexane (Ratio?). Crystals of the photodimer, (II), were obtained by irradiation of the reactant powder with the 430 nm line from a 150 W Xe lamp, followed by recrystallization from a mixture of chloroform and toluene (Ratio?).

Refinement top

Low-angle reflections with θ below 5.8° were not measured. H-atom parameters were freely refined.

Computing details top

For both compounds, data collection: KM-4 CCD Software (Kuma Diffraction, 2000); cell refinement: KM-4 CCD Software; data reduction: KM-4 CCD Software; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1990); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 (Johnson et al., 1997); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. A view of the reactant molecule, (I) (top) and a fragment of the crystal lattice (bottom). Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 25% probability level and H atoms are shown as small spheres of arbitrary radii.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. A view of the product molecule, (II) (top) and a fragment of the crystal lattice (bottom). Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 25% probability level and H atoms are shown as small spheres of arbitrary radii.
(I) 1-chloroanthracene top
Crystal data top
C14H9ClF(000) = 440
Mr = 212.66Dx = 1.366 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 1959 reflections
a = 10.3280 (9) Åθ = 5–26°
b = 12.0802 (11) ŵ = 0.33 mm1
c = 8.4369 (7) ÅT = 293 K
β = 100.673 (8)°Prism, yellow
V = 1034.41 (16) Å30.40 × 0.30 × 0.20 mm
Z = 4
Data collection top
Kuma KM-4 CCD area-detector
diffractometer
1641 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tubeRint = 0.025
Graphite monochromatorθmax = 26.0°, θmin = 5.8°
ω scansh = 1212
4935 measured reflectionsk = 1414
1991 independent reflectionsl = 510
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.057Hydrogen site location: difference Fourier map
wR(F2) = 0.161All H-atom parameters refined
S = 1.07 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0851P)2 + 0.3292P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1991 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
172 parametersΔρmax = 0.37 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.30 e Å3
Crystal data top
C14H9ClV = 1034.41 (16) Å3
Mr = 212.66Z = 4
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation
a = 10.3280 (9) ŵ = 0.33 mm1
b = 12.0802 (11) ÅT = 293 K
c = 8.4369 (7) Å0.40 × 0.30 × 0.20 mm
β = 100.673 (8)°
Data collection top
Kuma KM-4 CCD area-detector
diffractometer
1641 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
4935 measured reflectionsRint = 0.025
1991 independent reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0570 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.161All H-atom parameters refined
S = 1.07Δρmax = 0.37 e Å3
1991 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.30 e Å3
172 parameters
Special details top

Experimental. Intensities of reflections were collected with a CCD camera diffractometer. The general strategy of data collection for area-detector diffractometers was described by Scheidt, W. R. & Turowska-Tyrk, I. (1994). Inorg. Chem. 33, 1314–1318. Low-angle reflections with θ below 5.8° were not measured.

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.2065 (2)0.13424 (18)0.0230 (2)0.0522 (5)
C20.3087 (2)0.0755 (2)0.0574 (3)0.0599 (6)
C30.2842 (3)0.0103 (2)0.1778 (3)0.0682 (7)
C40.1625 (3)0.0308 (2)0.2546 (3)0.0637 (6)
C50.3146 (3)0.0461 (3)0.3448 (3)0.0770 (8)
C60.4159 (3)0.1058 (3)0.3083 (4)0.0867 (10)
C70.3948 (3)0.1884 (3)0.1911 (4)0.0791 (8)
C80.2728 (2)0.2102 (2)0.1097 (3)0.0636 (6)
C90.0341 (2)0.17319 (17)0.0639 (3)0.0481 (5)
C100.0757 (2)0.00846 (19)0.2980 (3)0.0573 (6)
C110.07394 (19)0.11499 (16)0.1001 (2)0.0446 (5)
C120.0512 (2)0.02983 (16)0.2200 (2)0.0495 (5)
C130.1823 (2)0.06662 (18)0.2634 (2)0.0539 (5)
C140.16198 (19)0.15141 (17)0.1440 (2)0.0487 (5)
Cl10.23845 (7)0.23691 (6)0.12162 (9)0.0804 (3)
H20.396 (3)0.087 (3)0.006 (4)0.089 (9)*
H30.359 (4)0.053 (3)0.194 (4)0.107 (10)*
H40.145 (3)0.089 (3)0.339 (4)0.105 (10)*
H50.330 (3)0.011 (2)0.421 (4)0.077 (8)*
H60.494 (4)0.094 (3)0.360 (5)0.128 (13)*
H70.470 (4)0.232 (3)0.173 (5)0.102 (11)*
H80.258 (3)0.269 (3)0.017 (4)0.091 (10)*
H90.028 (3)0.224 (2)0.010 (3)0.059 (7)*
H100.096 (3)0.051 (2)0.379 (4)0.084 (8)*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.0505 (11)0.0549 (11)0.0510 (11)0.0048 (9)0.0089 (8)0.0031 (9)
C20.0477 (12)0.0697 (14)0.0634 (13)0.0026 (11)0.0129 (10)0.0150 (11)
C30.0642 (15)0.0703 (15)0.0767 (16)0.0169 (13)0.0304 (13)0.0176 (13)
C40.0830 (17)0.0546 (13)0.0580 (13)0.0012 (12)0.0251 (12)0.0016 (10)
C50.0719 (18)0.092 (2)0.0611 (14)0.0291 (16)0.0040 (12)0.0069 (14)
C60.0458 (14)0.120 (3)0.088 (2)0.0210 (16)0.0063 (13)0.0263 (19)
C70.0478 (14)0.093 (2)0.097 (2)0.0008 (14)0.0148 (13)0.0290 (17)
C80.0539 (13)0.0654 (14)0.0735 (16)0.0005 (11)0.0173 (11)0.0129 (12)
C90.0518 (11)0.0457 (10)0.0466 (10)0.0068 (9)0.0089 (8)0.0023 (8)
C100.0716 (15)0.0537 (12)0.0463 (11)0.0126 (11)0.0100 (10)0.0039 (9)
C110.0436 (10)0.0473 (10)0.0437 (10)0.0061 (8)0.0098 (7)0.0085 (8)
C120.0627 (12)0.0444 (10)0.0437 (10)0.0044 (9)0.0156 (9)0.0038 (8)
C130.0538 (12)0.0588 (12)0.0473 (11)0.0133 (10)0.0051 (9)0.0080 (9)
C140.0441 (10)0.0515 (11)0.0514 (11)0.0048 (8)0.0115 (8)0.0104 (9)
Cl10.0630 (5)0.0885 (5)0.0848 (5)0.0153 (3)0.0015 (3)0.0278 (3)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
C1—C21.347 (3)C6—H60.85 (4)
C1—C111.422 (3)C7—C81.345 (4)
C1—Cl11.728 (2)C7—H70.97 (4)
C2—C31.440 (4)C8—C141.421 (3)
C2—H20.93 (3)C8—H81.04 (3)
C3—C41.327 (4)C9—C141.393 (3)
C3—H30.96 (4)C9—C111.399 (3)
C4—C121.438 (3)C9—H90.87 (3)
C4—H41.00 (3)C10—C121.378 (3)
C5—C61.353 (5)C10—C131.382 (3)
C5—C131.432 (3)C10—H100.99 (3)
C5—H50.94 (3)C11—C121.431 (3)
C6—C71.393 (5)C13—C141.425 (3)
C2—C1—C11122.8 (2)C7—C8—C14120.8 (3)
C2—C1—Cl1118.37 (18)C7—C8—H8120.4 (19)
C11—C1—Cl1118.85 (16)C14—C8—H8118.7 (18)
C1—C2—C3119.3 (2)C14—C9—C11121.5 (2)
C1—C2—H2123.3 (19)C14—C9—H9114.8 (17)
C3—C2—H2117.4 (19)C11—C9—H9123.7 (17)
C4—C3—C2120.3 (2)C12—C10—C13121.9 (2)
C4—C3—H3123 (2)C12—C10—H10121.6 (17)
C2—C3—H3117 (2)C13—C10—H10116.4 (17)
C3—C4—C12121.8 (2)C9—C11—C1123.82 (19)
C3—C4—H4121 (2)C9—C11—C12118.82 (18)
C12—C4—H4118 (2)C1—C11—C12117.35 (19)
C6—C5—C13120.5 (3)C10—C12—C11119.3 (2)
C6—C5—H5120.8 (18)C10—C12—C4122.2 (2)
C13—C5—H5118.7 (19)C11—C12—C4118.5 (2)
C5—C6—C7121.2 (3)C10—C13—C14119.72 (19)
C5—C6—H6119 (3)C10—C13—C5122.5 (2)
C7—C6—H6119 (3)C14—C13—C5117.8 (2)
C8—C7—C6120.7 (3)C9—C14—C8122.3 (2)
C8—C7—H7121 (2)C9—C14—C13118.77 (19)
C6—C7—H7118 (2)C8—C14—C13119.0 (2)
(II) trans-bi(1-chloro-9,10-dihydro-9,10-anthracenediyl) top
Crystal data top
C28H18Cl2F(000) = 880
Mr = 425.32Dx = 1.416 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -C 2ycCell parameters from 1164 reflections
a = 20.232 (2) Åθ = 5–22°
b = 11.0746 (13) ŵ = 0.34 mm1
c = 9.0872 (11) ÅT = 293 K
β = 101.475 (10)°Plate, colourless
V = 1995.4 (4) Å30.30 × 0.20 × 0.08 mm
Z = 4
Data collection top
Kuma KM-4 CCD area-detector
diffractometer
1545 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tubeRint = 0.030
Graphite monochromatorθmax = 26.0°, θmin = 5.9°
ω scansh = 2124
4922 measured reflectionsk = 1313
1945 independent reflectionsl = 118
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.045Hydrogen site location: difference Fourier map
wR(F2) = 0.119All H-atom parameters refined
S = 1.08 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.06P)2 + 0.9967P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1945 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
172 parametersΔρmax = 0.22 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.26 e Å3
Crystal data top
C28H18Cl2V = 1995.4 (4) Å3
Mr = 425.32Z = 4
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation
a = 20.232 (2) ŵ = 0.34 mm1
b = 11.0746 (13) ÅT = 293 K
c = 9.0872 (11) Å0.30 × 0.20 × 0.08 mm
β = 101.475 (10)°
Data collection top
Kuma KM-4 CCD area-detector
diffractometer
1545 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
4922 measured reflectionsRint = 0.030
1945 independent reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0450 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.119All H-atom parameters refined
S = 1.08Δρmax = 0.22 e Å3
1945 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.26 e Å3
172 parameters
Special details top

Experimental. Intensities of reflections were collected with a CCD camera diffractometer. The general strategy of data collection for area-detector diffractometers was described by Scheidt, W. R. & Turowska-Tyrk, I. (1994). Inorg. Chem. 33, 1314–1318. Low-angle reflections with θ below 5.8° were not measured.

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Cl10.05591 (3)0.79196 (6)0.11803 (7)0.0544 (2)
C10.09676 (10)0.6850 (2)0.0283 (2)0.0360 (5)
C20.05764 (12)0.5988 (2)0.0591 (3)0.0445 (6)
C30.08870 (12)0.5126 (2)0.1304 (3)0.0462 (6)
C40.15778 (12)0.5135 (2)0.1175 (2)0.0394 (5)
C50.36415 (11)0.5823 (2)0.2106 (3)0.0417 (5)
C60.39430 (13)0.6158 (2)0.3550 (3)0.0501 (6)
C70.36493 (13)0.7020 (2)0.4295 (3)0.0486 (6)
C80.30482 (11)0.7551 (2)0.3610 (2)0.0404 (5)
C90.21126 (10)0.78342 (18)0.1312 (2)0.0318 (5)
C100.27151 (10)0.61173 (19)0.0212 (2)0.0321 (5)
C110.16630 (10)0.68827 (18)0.0444 (2)0.0319 (5)
C120.19651 (10)0.60097 (18)0.0316 (2)0.0324 (5)
C130.30484 (10)0.63614 (18)0.1398 (2)0.0331 (5)
C140.27477 (10)0.72307 (18)0.2160 (2)0.0330 (5)
H20.0091 (14)0.600 (2)0.070 (3)0.056 (7)*
H30.0605 (15)0.451 (3)0.186 (3)0.066 (8)*
H40.1779 (10)0.455 (2)0.169 (2)0.031 (5)*
H50.3863 (12)0.525 (2)0.157 (3)0.043 (6)*
H60.4353 (14)0.580 (2)0.399 (3)0.057 (7)*
H70.3871 (14)0.723 (2)0.532 (3)0.061 (8)*
H80.2850 (13)0.814 (2)0.414 (3)0.048 (7)*
H90.1903 (11)0.822 (2)0.200 (3)0.035 (6)*
H100.2890 (11)0.538 (2)0.054 (3)0.042 (6)*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cl10.0368 (3)0.0685 (5)0.0597 (4)0.0046 (3)0.0139 (3)0.0094 (3)
C10.0321 (10)0.0424 (12)0.0341 (11)0.0033 (9)0.0080 (8)0.0046 (9)
C20.0330 (12)0.0498 (14)0.0486 (13)0.0105 (11)0.0031 (10)0.0051 (11)
C30.0411 (13)0.0453 (13)0.0485 (14)0.0151 (11)0.0002 (10)0.0015 (11)
C40.0441 (12)0.0346 (11)0.0380 (12)0.0065 (10)0.0047 (10)0.0014 (9)
C50.0392 (12)0.0403 (12)0.0436 (13)0.0018 (10)0.0037 (10)0.0037 (10)
C60.0402 (13)0.0530 (15)0.0493 (14)0.0005 (12)0.0097 (11)0.0110 (12)
C70.0519 (14)0.0523 (15)0.0354 (13)0.0098 (12)0.0060 (11)0.0040 (11)
C80.0435 (13)0.0440 (12)0.0327 (11)0.0080 (10)0.0052 (10)0.0013 (10)
C90.0302 (10)0.0379 (11)0.0286 (10)0.0011 (9)0.0089 (8)0.0041 (8)
C100.0335 (11)0.0303 (11)0.0320 (10)0.0004 (9)0.0055 (8)0.0022 (9)
C110.0312 (10)0.0357 (11)0.0287 (10)0.0060 (9)0.0060 (8)0.0035 (8)
C120.0338 (11)0.0333 (11)0.0291 (10)0.0044 (9)0.0042 (8)0.0034 (8)
C130.0319 (10)0.0335 (10)0.0329 (10)0.0049 (9)0.0039 (8)0.0032 (8)
C140.0334 (10)0.0370 (11)0.0281 (10)0.0070 (9)0.0050 (8)0.0021 (8)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Cl1—C11.737 (2)C7—C81.382 (3)
C1—C21.385 (3)C7—H70.98 (3)
C1—C111.386 (3)C8—C141.383 (3)
C2—C31.374 (4)C8—H80.95 (3)
C2—H20.97 (3)C9—C111.508 (3)
C3—C41.379 (3)C9—C141.516 (3)
C3—H30.96 (3)C9—C10i1.615 (3)
C4—C121.385 (3)C9—H90.92 (2)
C4—H40.94 (2)C10—C121.506 (3)
C5—C131.379 (3)C10—C131.508 (3)
C5—C61.383 (3)C10—C9i1.615 (3)
C5—H50.96 (2)C10—H100.96 (2)
C6—C71.372 (4)C11—C121.398 (3)
C6—H60.94 (3)C13—C141.394 (3)
C2—C1—C11122.0 (2)C11—C9—C14108.66 (17)
C2—C1—Cl1117.93 (17)C11—C9—C10i111.13 (16)
C11—C1—Cl1120.03 (16)C14—C9—C10i111.49 (16)
C3—C2—C1119.1 (2)C11—C9—H9111.4 (14)
C3—C2—H2120.6 (16)C14—C9—H9108.3 (14)
C1—C2—H2120.2 (16)C10i—C9—H9105.8 (14)
C2—C3—C4120.4 (2)C12—C10—C13109.02 (16)
C2—C3—H3117.3 (17)C12—C10—C9i110.89 (16)
C4—C3—H3122.3 (17)C13—C10—C9i111.20 (16)
C3—C4—C12120.2 (2)C12—C10—H10110.0 (14)
C3—C4—H4119.0 (13)C13—C10—H10109.5 (14)
C12—C4—H4120.7 (13)C9i—C10—H10106.1 (14)
C13—C5—C6120.3 (2)C1—C11—C12117.68 (18)
C13—C5—H5119.8 (14)C1—C11—C9124.56 (19)
C6—C5—H5119.7 (14)C12—C11—C9117.66 (17)
C7—C6—C5120.2 (2)C4—C12—C11120.54 (19)
C7—C6—H6121.3 (16)C4—C12—C10122.76 (19)
C5—C6—H6118.5 (16)C11—C12—C10116.63 (17)
C6—C7—C8120.1 (2)C5—C13—C14119.48 (19)
C6—C7—H7118.4 (16)C5—C13—C10123.67 (19)
C8—C7—H7121.4 (16)C14—C13—C10116.76 (18)
C7—C8—C14120.0 (2)C8—C14—C13119.8 (2)
C7—C8—H8119.2 (15)C8—C14—C9122.6 (2)
C14—C8—H8120.7 (15)C13—C14—C9117.48 (17)
Symmetry code: (i) x+1/2, y+3/2, z.

Experimental details

(I)(II)
Crystal data
Chemical formulaC14H9ClC28H18Cl2
Mr212.66425.32
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/cMonoclinic, C2/c
Temperature (K)293293
a, b, c (Å)10.3280 (9), 12.0802 (11), 8.4369 (7)20.232 (2), 11.0746 (13), 9.0872 (11)
β (°) 100.673 (8) 101.475 (10)
V3)1034.41 (16)1995.4 (4)
Z44
Radiation typeMo KαMo Kα
µ (mm1)0.330.34
Crystal size (mm)0.40 × 0.30 × 0.200.30 × 0.20 × 0.08
Data collection
DiffractometerKuma KM-4 CCD area-detector
diffractometer
Kuma KM-4 CCD area-detector
diffractometer
Absorption correction
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
4935, 1991, 1641 4922, 1945, 1545
Rint0.0250.030
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.6170.617
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.057, 0.161, 1.07 0.045, 0.119, 1.08
No. of reflections19911945
No. of parameters172172
H-atom treatmentAll H-atom parameters refinedAll H-atom parameters refined
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.37, 0.300.22, 0.26

Computer programs: KM-4 CCD Software (Kuma Diffraction, 2000), KM-4 CCD Software, SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1990), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), ORTEP-3 (Johnson et al., 1997), SHELXL97.

Selected bond lengths (Å) for (II) top
C9—C111.508 (3)C10—C131.508 (3)
C9—C141.516 (3)C11—C121.398 (3)
C9—C10i1.615 (3)C13—C141.394 (3)
C10—C121.506 (3)
Symmetry code: (i) x+1/2, y+3/2, z.
 

Follow Acta Cryst. C
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds