Buy article online - an online subscription or single-article purchase is required to access this article.
The crystal structure of chlorofluoromethane, CH2ClF, has been determined at 100 and 30 K using indexing, packing considerations and Rietveld refinement of neutron powder profiles. There is only one phase, in monoclinic space group P21 and with two molecules in the unit cell occupying general positions. The structure has close packing in several directions and there are weak hydrogen bonds forming zigzag chains.
Supporting information
CCDC reference: 199438
Chlorofluoromethane was obtained from PCR (Gainesville, Florida, USA), and had a
stated purity of better than 99%. It was used as supplied. Polycrystalline
samples were obtained by condensing the gas into a thin-walled vanadium can, 5 mm in diameter by 5 cm in length, immersed in liquid nitrogen. At frequent
intervals during the process, the resulting solid was ground with a sharp rod
into a fine powder. The filled can was mounted in a top loading helium
cryostat and the sample was annealed at 120 K for about 1 h before starting
measurements. Measurements were made at the two wavelengths of 1.32790 (4) and
2.3687 (1) Å. The profile collected with the longer wavelength was used for
indexing purposes only, and in this case the detector was shifted by 0.05° to
give a total of 1600 data points recorded at 30 K and in the range 2θ =
26–106°. The data recorded at 100 K and 30 K with the short wavelength were
in the range 2θ = 5–117°, with a data-point separation of 0.10. Before the
actual runs, the sample can was turned about the vertical axis through 70° in
steps of 10°, and at each step a low-count diffraction pattern was taken. A
comparison of the relative intensities of the peaks in these profiles showed
that the preferred orientation about the cylinder axis was not a problem.
Nevertheless, during the runs, the sample can was rotated continuously about a
vertical axis to minimize any effects of preferred orientation about the
cylinder axis.
Some 20 low-angle lines from the long wavelength profile were used in the
indexing programs contained in the CRYSFIRE system for automatic powder
indexing (Shirley, 1999). The indexing was initially complicated by the
presence of two weak lines in the long-wavelength profile. One of these was
absent in the short-wavelength profile, suggesting that it was probably an
instrumental artifact. The other showed up as a weak peak at the foot of a
strong line and is believed to an impurity. Several unit cells were suggested,
but three of them, all monoclinic, had high figures of merit and were
multiples of each other in volume. The smallest cell, large enough to contain
two molecules, was considered likely, but the number of lines recorded was not
sufficient to indicate the space group clearly. P2, P21, P2/m and
P21/m were possibilities, but only P21 allows an
arrangement of molecules consistent with hydrogen-bonded chains. Packing
considerations also showed that the unit cell was of reasonable dimensions.
Lattice parameters at 30 K are given below. At 100 K, the lattice parameters
are a = 6.8123 (8) Å, b = 4.1963 (4) Å, c = 5.0524 (5) Å, β = 108.106 (8)°
and cell volume = 137.27 (2) Å3. The initial positions and orientations of
the molecules in the unit cell were found using the Williams packing program
(Williams, 1981), with Buckingham potentials as given by Gavezzotti (1983).
The base molecule was given arbitrary orientations and, from these starting
positions, it was shifted through the asymmetric unit until the energy was
minimized with respect to position and orientation. Care was taken to avoid
false minima with unphysical bond lengths. The final solution was tried in the
profile-fitting program GSAS (Larson & Von Dreele, 1989), and it
refined to give structural parameters as listed. Initially, the background,
histogram scale factor, diffractometer zero position and lattice parameters
were varied. Refinements of the molecular translations and rotations were
added later. Refinements of the isotropic displacement parameters, preferred
orientation parameter and peak shape parameter, U, V and W, followed. The peak
shape functions were assumed to be Gaussian. In the final stages, the rigid
body constraints were completely removed, allowing the individual atoms to
vary independently of each other, and isotropic displacement parameters were
introduced.
Data collection: local program; cell refinement: CRYSFIRE (Shirley, 1999); data reduction: GENIE (Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, 1986); program(s) used to solve structure: packing program (Williams, 1981); program(s) used to refine structure: GSAS (Larson & Von Dreele, 1989); molecular graphics: GSAS; software used to prepare material for publication: GSAS.
Crystal data top
CH2ClF | Z = 2 |
Mr = 68.48 | Dx = 1.699 Mg m−3 |
Monoclinic, P21 | Melting point: 140.2 K |
Hall symbol: P 2yb | Neutron radiation, λ = 1.32790(4) Å |
a = 6.7676 (6) Å | T = 30 K |
b = 4.1477 (3) Å | white |
c = 5.0206 (5) Å | cylinder, 50 × 5 mm |
β = 108.205 (7)° | Specimen preparation: Prepared at 77 K |
V = 133.88 (2) Å3 | |
Data collection top
DUALSPEC diffractometer | Data collection mode: transmission |
Radiation source: NRU reactor, neutron | Scan method: step |
Si(531) monochromator | 2θmin = 10.1°, 2θmax = 115.9°, 2θstep = 0.1° |
Specimen mounting: vanadium can | |
Refinement top
Refinement on Inet | Profile function: Gaussian |
Least-squares matrix: full with fixed elements per cycle | 35 parameters |
Rp = 0.013 | H-atom parameters not refined |
Rwp = 0.017 | |
Rexp = 0.010 | (Δ/σ)max = 0.03 |
χ2 = 2.924 | Background function: cosine Fourier series with 6 terms |
1059 data points | |
Crystal data top
CH2ClF | β = 108.205 (7)° |
Mr = 68.48 | V = 133.88 (2) Å3 |
Monoclinic, P21 | Z = 2 |
a = 6.7676 (6) Å | Neutron radiation, λ = 1.32790(4) Å |
b = 4.1477 (3) Å | T = 30 K |
c = 5.0206 (5) Å | cylinder, 50 × 5 mm |
Data collection top
DUALSPEC diffractometer | Scan method: step |
Specimen mounting: vanadium can | 2θmin = 10.1°, 2θmax = 115.9°, 2θstep = 0.1° |
Data collection mode: transmission | |
Refinement top
Rp = 0.013 | 1059 data points |
Rwp = 0.017 | 35 parameters |
Rexp = 0.010 | H-atom parameters not refined |
χ2 = 2.924 | |
Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top | x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | |
C1 | 0.1916 (12) | −0.1398 (13) | 0.3506 (17) | 0.0082 (15)* | |
H2 | 0.150 (3) | −0.3911 (19) | 0.292 (3) | 0.020 (4)* | |
H3 | 0.265 (2) | −0.106 (2) | 0.572 (3) | 0.028 (4)* | |
Cl4 | 0.3661 (7) | −0.0061 (11) | 0.1699 (10) | 0.0077 (11)* | |
F5 | 0.0140 (12) | 0.0425 (17) | 0.2628 (17) | 0.014 (2)* | |
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
C1—H2 | 1.095 (13) | C1—F5 | 1.371 (10) |
C1—H3 | 1.078 (19) | Cl4—Cl4i | 3.526 (8) |
C1—Cl4 | 1.787 (9) | Cl4—Cl4ii | 3.526 (8) |
| | | |
H2—C1—H3 | 113.5 (12) | H3—C1—F5 | 109.6 (5) |
H2—C1—Cl4 | 108.1 (10) | Cl4—C1—F5 | 108.5 (5) |
H2—C1—F5 | 108.3 (11) | C1—Cl4—Cl4i | 125.9 (3) |
H3—C1—Cl4 | 108.6 (9) | C1—Cl4—Cl4ii | 161.7 (3) |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, y−1/2, −z; (ii) −x+1, y+1/2, −z. |
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
C1—H2···F5iii | 1.10 (1) | 2.51 (1) | 3.579 (10) | 165 (1) |
C1—H2···F5iv | 1.10 (1) | 2.67 (2) | 3.237 (11) | 112 (1) |
C1—H3···Cl4v | 1.08 (2) | 2.89 (2) | 3.948 (9) | 168 (1) |
C1—H3···Cl4vi | 1.08 (2) | 2.94 (1) | 3.544 (9) | 116 (1) |
C1—H2···Cl4iii | 1.10 (1) | 3.09 (1) | 3.975 (7) | 138 (1) |
Symmetry codes: (iii) x, y−1, z; (iv) −x, y−1/2, −z; (v) x, y, z+1; (vi) −x+1, y−1/2, −z+1. |
Experimental details
Crystal data |
Chemical formula | CH2ClF |
Mr | 68.48 |
Crystal system, space group | Monoclinic, P21 |
Temperature (K) | 30 |
a, b, c (Å) | 6.7676 (6), 4.1477 (3), 5.0206 (5) |
β (°) | 108.205 (7) |
V (Å3) | 133.88 (2) |
Z | 2 |
Radiation type | Neutron, λ = 1.32790(4) Å |
µ (mm−1) | ? |
Specimen shape, size (mm) | Cylinder, 50 × 5 |
|
Data collection |
Diffractometer | DUALSPEC diffractometer |
Specimen mounting | Vanadium can |
Data collection mode | Transmission |
Scan method | Step |
2θ values (°) | 2θmin = 10.1 2θmax = 115.9 2θstep = 0.1 |
|
Refinement |
R factors and goodness of fit | Rp = 0.013, Rwp = 0.017, Rexp = 0.010, χ2 = 2.924 |
No. of data points | 1059 |
No. of parameters | 35 |
No. of restraints | ? |
H-atom treatment | H-atom parameters not refined |
Selected geometric parameters (Å, º) topC1—H2 | 1.095 (13) | C1—F5 | 1.371 (10) |
C1—H3 | 1.078 (19) | Cl4—Cl4i | 3.526 (8) |
C1—Cl4 | 1.787 (9) | Cl4—Cl4ii | 3.526 (8) |
| | | |
H2—C1—H3 | 113.5 (12) | H3—C1—F5 | 109.6 (5) |
H2—C1—Cl4 | 108.1 (10) | Cl4—C1—F5 | 108.5 (5) |
H2—C1—F5 | 108.3 (11) | C1—Cl4—Cl4i | 125.9 (3) |
H3—C1—Cl4 | 108.6 (9) | C1—Cl4—Cl4ii | 161.7 (3) |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, y−1/2, −z; (ii) −x+1, y+1/2, −z. |
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
C1—H2···F5iii | 1.095 (13) | 2.512 (14) | 3.579 (10) | 164.5 (13) |
C1—H2···F5iv | 1.095 (13) | 2.67 (2) | 3.237 (11) | 111.5 (10) |
C1—H3···Cl4v | 1.078 (19) | 2.891 (16) | 3.948 (9) | 167.5 (5) |
C1—H3···Cl4vi | 1.078 (19) | 2.940 (14) | 3.544 (9) | 115.8 (9) |
C1—H2···Cl4iii | 1.095 (13) | 3.094 (12) | 3.975 (7) | 137.9 (12) |
Symmetry codes: (iii) x, y−1, z; (iv) −x, y−1/2, −z; (v) x, y, z+1; (vi) −x+1, y−1/2, −z+1. |
Subscribe to Acta Crystallographica Section C: Structural Chemistry
The full text of this article is available to subscribers to the journal.
If you have already registered and are using a computer listed in your registration details, please email
support@iucr.org for assistance.
The research described here on chlorofluoromethane forms part of an extensive study of the structures, vibrational properties and intermolecular forces of crystals of the halogenated derivatives of methane (Schleuter et al., 1994; Torrie et al., 1999, and references therein). Chlorofluoromethane, CH2ClF, also known as Freon 31, is a gas under normal atmospheric conditions, and its boiling and melting points are 264.1 K and 140.2 K, respectively. The molecule is a strongly polar asymmetric top described by point group Cs and, in the solid, it is expected that there will be hydrogen bonding involving the F and H atoms in adjacent molecules. There is no report in the literature of the crystal structure of the compound. A recent Raman and IR study (Schleuter et al., 1994) of the solid concluded that there is only one phase with a space group that is likely to be noncentrosymmetric, based on the coincidence of Raman and IR peaks, and that there are at least two molecules, and more likely four, in the unit cell. The purpose of this paper is to report the crystal structure of CH2ClF determined using neutron powder profiles and the Rietveld refinement procedure (Larson & Von Dreele, 1989).
Measured, calculated and difference profiles at 30 K are shown in Fig. 1, and the contents of the unit cell are shown in Fig. 2. The quality of the fit, as indicated by the R factors and the difference curve, is reasonably good in view of the usual problems in obtaining good polycrystalline samples. The errors quoted are the errors produced by the fitting program and, as such, are likely to be underestimates of the true errors by a factor of three (Powell et al., 1982).
Some short non-bonded distances are listed in Tables 1 and 2. These distances are less than or close to the sum of the van der Waals radii. Only one H···F distance is significantly shorter than the sum of the van der Walls radii, indicating the formation of hydrogen-bonded chains. The same H atom is also in close contact with a second F atom. The second H atom is in close contact with two Cl atoms. Each Cl atom in the ac plane makes contact with two Cl atoms in two neighbouring molecules at approximately y = 1/2. The internal structure of the molecule is only slightly distorted from its shape in the gas phase.
It is interesting to look at the sensitivity of the stretching-mode frequencies to the weak bonds formed in this crystal. The main peaks in the C—F stretch region of the Raman and IR spectra are ~4% lower than the gas-phase value. Similarly, the main peaks in the C—Cl stretch region are 2.8% lower than the gas-phase value (Krasnov et al., 1970). Even though only one of the F···H distances and none of the Cl···H distances are significantly shorter than the sum of the van der Waals radii, there is still a pronounced effect on the stretching-mode frequencies for both types of interactions. Since there is close packing of the molecules as a whole, the distances between atoms will be determined by both the direct interactions between the atoms and the steric interference between other atoms in neighbouring molecules. In other words, the shifts in frequency should be a better measure of hydrogen bonding than the distances between the non-bonded halogen and H atoms. Note that, in the solid phase, the frequencies of the stretching modes usually increase with decreasing temperature, so the fact that the frequencies decreased in the referenced measurements at 12 K has added significance.
Finally, a comment about the use of packing programs. We mentioned in an earlier paper (Torrie et al., 1996) that, if the space group is known, the Williams packing program (Williams, 1981) with Buckingham potentials has been found to be very useful in finding the initial position of the molecule for insertion in the GSAS refinement program (Larson & Von Dreele, 1989). However, as in this case when several space groups are initially indicated, the Williams packing program may still give a reasonable minimum energy position for a molecule without it being the correct one. In the current case, a triclinic cell, with a high figure of merit and the same volume as the correct cell, was tried in the packing program and the lattice energy was reasonable, but the refinement using GSAS diverged and the fitting was poor.