Supporting information
Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270101002864/sk1430sup1.cif | |
Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270101002864/sk1430Isup2.hkl |
CCDC reference: 164632
For related literature, see: Assefa et al. (1995); Darensbourg et al. (1994, 1995, 1997); Joó et al. (1996); Otto et al. (1998); Otto, Roodt & Smith (2000); Sheldrick (1997, 1997); Tolman (1977).
cis-[Pt(Cl)2(PTA)2] (7 mg, 0.0121 mmol) was dissolved in water (5 ml) and an aqueous solution (1 ml) of NaI (7 mg, 0.0467 mmol) was added. Slow evaporation of the solvent yielded bright yellow crystals suitable for X-ray analysis in a near quantitative yield.
The data were collected on a Bruker SMART CCD diffractometer. H atoms were introduced at calculated positions and refined using standard SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997) constraints. The maximum residual electron density of 1.730 and -1.591 e Å-3 are located within 1 Å of the platinum atom.
Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 1997); cell refinement: SMART; data reduction: SHELXTL (Bruker, 1997); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 1997); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.
Fig. 1. Structure showing the numbering scheme and displacement ellipsoids (30% probability) for the title compound. Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity. [Symmetry code: (i) -x, -y, -z] |
[PtI2(C6H12N3P)2] | F(000) = 704 |
Mr = 763.20 | Dx = 2.663 Mg m−3 |
Monoclinic, P21/n | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
a = 7.472 (2) Å | Cell parameters from 6552 reflections |
b = 12.141 (4) Å | θ = 2.6–28.3° |
c = 10.537 (3) Å | µ = 10.79 mm−1 |
β = 95.348 (5)° | T = 293 K |
V = 951.7 (5) Å3 | Rectangle, yellow |
Z = 2 | 0.26 × 0.22 × 0.12 mm |
Bruker SMART CCD diffractometer | 2345 independent reflections |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | 1944 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.024 |
ω scans | θmax = 28.3°, θmin = 2.6° |
Absorption correction: empirical (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996) | h = −9→5 |
Tmin = 0.083, Tmax = 0.285 | k = −12→16 |
6552 measured reflections | l = −14→12 |
Refinement on F2 | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
Least-squares matrix: full | Hydrogen site location: riding model |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.022 | H-atom parameters constrained |
wR(F2) = 0.050 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0254P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
S = 0.98 | (Δ/σ)max = 0.001 |
2345 reflections | Δρmax = 1.73 e Å−3 |
108 parameters | Δρmin = −1.59 e Å−3 |
0 restraints | Extinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4 |
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods | Extinction coefficient: 0.0063 (2) |
[PtI2(C6H12N3P)2] | V = 951.7 (5) Å3 |
Mr = 763.20 | Z = 2 |
Monoclinic, P21/n | Mo Kα radiation |
a = 7.472 (2) Å | µ = 10.79 mm−1 |
b = 12.141 (4) Å | T = 293 K |
c = 10.537 (3) Å | 0.26 × 0.22 × 0.12 mm |
β = 95.348 (5)° |
Bruker SMART CCD diffractometer | 2345 independent reflections |
Absorption correction: empirical (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996) | 1944 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Tmin = 0.083, Tmax = 0.285 | Rint = 0.024 |
6552 measured reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.022 | 0 restraints |
wR(F2) = 0.050 | H-atom parameters constrained |
S = 0.98 | Δρmax = 1.73 e Å−3 |
2345 reflections | Δρmin = −1.59 e Å−3 |
108 parameters |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
Pt | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.02579 (8) | |
I | 0.25022 (4) | −0.04039 (3) | −0.14965 (3) | 0.04287 (10) | |
P | 0.12312 (15) | 0.17097 (8) | 0.05070 (10) | 0.0279 (2) | |
N1 | 0.3365 (5) | 0.2837 (3) | 0.2348 (3) | 0.0385 (9) | |
N2 | 0.0959 (5) | 0.3899 (3) | 0.1148 (3) | 0.0386 (9) | |
N3 | 0.3631 (6) | 0.3377 (3) | 0.0102 (4) | 0.0426 (9) | |
C1 | 0.2569 (6) | 0.1748 (3) | 0.2064 (4) | 0.0364 (11) | |
H1A | 0.1807 | 0.1552 | 0.2726 | 0.043 (4)* | |
H1B | 0.3522 | 0.1204 | 0.2072 | 0.043 (4)* | |
C2 | −0.0158 (6) | 0.2943 (4) | 0.0706 (5) | 0.0398 (11) | |
H2A | −0.0828 | 0.3121 | −0.0100 | 0.043 (4)* | |
H2B | −0.1014 | 0.2787 | 0.1320 | 0.043 (4)* | |
C3 | 0.2884 (7) | 0.2341 (4) | −0.0452 (4) | 0.0434 (12) | |
H3A | 0.3858 | 0.1825 | −0.0531 | 0.043 (4)* | |
H3B | 0.2317 | 0.2487 | −0.1301 | 0.043 (4)* | |
C4 | 0.1947 (7) | 0.3668 (4) | 0.2393 (4) | 0.0409 (11) | |
H4A | 0.2483 | 0.4347 | 0.2732 | 0.043 (4)* | |
H4B | 0.1101 | 0.3419 | 0.2975 | 0.043 (4)* | |
C5 | 0.2210 (7) | 0.4200 (4) | 0.0227 (4) | 0.0422 (11) | |
H5A | 0.2767 | 0.4897 | 0.0478 | 0.043 (4)* | |
H5B | 0.1542 | 0.4303 | −0.0599 | 0.043 (4)* | |
C6 | 0.4553 (6) | 0.3167 (4) | 0.1376 (5) | 0.0460 (13) | |
H6A | 0.5439 | 0.2592 | 0.1304 | 0.043 (4)* | |
H6B | 0.5193 | 0.3830 | 0.1665 | 0.043 (4)* |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
Pt | 0.02744 (13) | 0.02412 (12) | 0.02531 (12) | 0.00359 (9) | −0.00027 (8) | −0.00592 (8) |
I | 0.04472 (19) | 0.03609 (18) | 0.05049 (19) | 0.00399 (14) | 0.01865 (15) | −0.01132 (13) |
P | 0.0306 (6) | 0.0246 (5) | 0.0282 (5) | 0.0023 (4) | 0.0009 (4) | −0.0053 (4) |
N1 | 0.048 (2) | 0.0266 (19) | 0.038 (2) | −0.0035 (17) | −0.0127 (18) | −0.0012 (15) |
N2 | 0.043 (2) | 0.0245 (19) | 0.047 (2) | 0.0077 (16) | −0.0024 (18) | −0.0029 (15) |
N3 | 0.050 (3) | 0.031 (2) | 0.048 (2) | −0.0054 (18) | 0.011 (2) | −0.0055 (16) |
C1 | 0.045 (3) | 0.025 (2) | 0.037 (2) | 0.0014 (19) | −0.010 (2) | 0.0012 (17) |
C2 | 0.037 (3) | 0.034 (2) | 0.047 (3) | 0.0103 (19) | −0.003 (2) | −0.0057 (19) |
C3 | 0.054 (3) | 0.036 (3) | 0.042 (3) | −0.005 (2) | 0.016 (2) | −0.009 (2) |
C4 | 0.058 (3) | 0.031 (2) | 0.033 (2) | 0.001 (2) | 0.002 (2) | −0.0094 (18) |
C5 | 0.059 (3) | 0.026 (2) | 0.042 (3) | 0.003 (2) | 0.001 (2) | 0.0026 (18) |
C6 | 0.036 (3) | 0.027 (2) | 0.072 (4) | −0.001 (2) | −0.009 (3) | −0.005 (2) |
Pt—Pi | 2.3128 (12) | N3—C6 | 1.473 (6) |
Pt—P | 2.3128 (12) | N3—C3 | 1.474 (5) |
Pt—Ii | 2.6022 (6) | C1—H1A | 0.9700 |
Pt—I | 2.6022 (6) | C1—H1B | 0.9700 |
P—C3 | 1.835 (5) | C2—H2A | 0.9700 |
P—C1 | 1.841 (4) | C2—H2B | 0.9700 |
P—C2 | 1.845 (4) | C3—H3A | 0.9700 |
N1—C4 | 1.467 (6) | C3—H3B | 0.9700 |
N1—C1 | 1.469 (5) | C4—H4A | 0.9700 |
N1—C6 | 1.473 (6) | C4—H4B | 0.9700 |
N2—C5 | 1.455 (6) | C5—H5A | 0.9700 |
N2—C4 | 1.471 (5) | C5—H5B | 0.9700 |
N2—C2 | 1.480 (6) | C6—H6A | 0.9700 |
N3—C5 | 1.473 (6) | C6—H6B | 0.9700 |
Pi—Pt—P | 180.00 (2) | P—C2—H2A | 109.3 |
Pi—Pt—Ii | 90.94 (3) | N2—C2—H2B | 109.3 |
P—Pt—Ii | 89.06 (3) | P—C2—H2B | 109.3 |
Pi—Pt—I | 89.06 (3) | H2A—C2—H2B | 108.0 |
P—Pt—I | 90.94 (3) | N3—C3—P | 112.8 (3) |
Ii—Pt—I | 180.000 (13) | N3—C3—H3A | 109.0 |
C1—P—C2 | 98.2 (2) | P—C3—H3A | 109.0 |
C1—P—C3 | 98.2 (2) | N3—C3—H3B | 109.0 |
C2—P—C3 | 97.9 (2) | P—C3—H3B | 109.0 |
C1—P—Pt | 113.57 (13) | H3A—C3—H3B | 107.8 |
C2—P—Pt | 122.61 (16) | N1—C4—N2 | 114.0 (3) |
C3—P—Pt | 121.44 (14) | N1—C4—H4A | 108.7 |
C4—N1—C1 | 110.2 (4) | N2—C4—H4A | 108.7 |
C4—N1—C6 | 108.6 (3) | N1—C4—H4B | 108.7 |
C1—N1—C6 | 111.2 (3) | N2—C4—H4B | 108.7 |
C5—N2—C4 | 110.0 (4) | H4A—C4—H4B | 107.6 |
C5—N2—C2 | 111.4 (4) | N2—C5—N3 | 113.8 (3) |
C4—N2—C2 | 110.6 (3) | N2—C5—H5A | 108.8 |
C5—N3—C6 | 108.4 (4) | N3—C5—H5A | 108.8 |
C5—N3—C3 | 111.4 (4) | N2—C5—H5B | 108.8 |
C6—N3—C3 | 109.9 (4) | N3—C5—H5B | 108.8 |
N1—C1—P | 112.3 (3) | H5A—C5—H5B | 107.7 |
N1—C1—H1A | 109.1 | N1—C6—N3 | 114.8 (4) |
P—C1—H1A | 109.1 | N1—C6—H6A | 108.6 |
N1—C1—H1B | 109.1 | N3—C6—H6A | 108.6 |
P—C1—H1B | 109.1 | N1—C6—H6B | 108.6 |
H1A—C1—H1B | 107.9 | N3—C6—H6B | 108.6 |
N2—C2—P | 111.5 (3) | H6A—C6—H6B | 107.5 |
N2—C2—H2A | 109.3 |
Symmetry code: (i) −x, −y, −z. |
Experimental details
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | [PtI2(C6H12N3P)2] |
Mr | 763.20 |
Crystal system, space group | Monoclinic, P21/n |
Temperature (K) | 293 |
a, b, c (Å) | 7.472 (2), 12.141 (4), 10.537 (3) |
β (°) | 95.348 (5) |
V (Å3) | 951.7 (5) |
Z | 2 |
Radiation type | Mo Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 10.79 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.26 × 0.22 × 0.12 |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Bruker SMART CCD diffractometer |
Absorption correction | Empirical (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996) |
Tmin, Tmax | 0.083, 0.285 |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections | 6552, 2345, 1944 |
Rint | 0.024 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.667 |
Refinement | |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.022, 0.050, 0.98 |
No. of reflections | 2345 |
No. of parameters | 108 |
H-atom treatment | H-atom parameters constrained |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 1.73, −1.59 |
Computer programs: SMART (Bruker, 1997), SMART, SHELXTL (Bruker, 1997), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 1997), SHELXL97.
Pt—P | 2.3128 (12) | P—C1 | 1.841 (4) |
Pt—I | 2.6022 (6) | P—C2 | 1.845 (4) |
P—C3 | 1.835 (5) | ||
Pi—Pt—P | 180.00 (2) | C1—P—C3 | 98.2 (2) |
Pi—Pt—I | 89.06 (3) | C2—P—C3 | 97.9 (2) |
P—Pt—I | 90.94 (3) | C1—P—Pt | 113.57 (13) |
Ii—Pt—I | 180.000 (13) | C2—P—Pt | 122.61 (16) |
C1—P—C2 | 98.2 (2) | C3—P—Pt | 121.44 (14) |
Symmetry code: (i) −x, −y, −z. |
Complex | jPt-P (Å) | Pt-X (Å) |
[Pt(I)2(PPh3)2]a | 2.318 (2) | 2.603 (1) |
[Pt(I)2{P(C6F5)3}2]b | 2.292 (6) | 2.626 (2) |
[Pt(I)2{P(o-Tol)3}2]c | 2.348 (2) | 2.622 (1) |
[Pt(I)2(PCy3)2]d | 2.371 (2) | 2.612 (1) |
[Pt(I)2(PMe3)2]e | 2.315 (4) | 2.599 (2) |
[Pt(I)2(PTA)2]f | 2.3128 (12) | 2.6022 (6) |
[Pt(CN)2(PTA)2]g | 2.305 (2) | 1.975 (9) |
[PtCl(PTA)3]Clh | 2.323 (2) | 2.371 (2) |
[Pt(I)2(PTA)3]i | 2.3174 (11) | 2.7192 (3) |
3.2369 (3) |
Notes: (a) Boag et al. (1991); (b) Hunter et al. (1986); (c) P(o-Tol)3 = P(o-CH3-Ph)3, Alyea et al., (1979); (d) Alcock, & Leviston (1971); (e) Hitchcock et al. (1977); (f) This work; (g) Assefa et al. (1995); (h) Muir et al. (1993); (i) Five-coordinate complex, Otto & Roodt (2000); (j) Average of trans P-Pt-P bonds. |
Subscribe to Acta Crystallographica Section C: Structural Chemistry
The full text of this article is available to subscribers to the journal.
- Information on subscribing
- Sample issue
- Purchase subscription
- Reduced-price subscriptions
- If you have already subscribed, you may need to register
The air-stable water-soluble 1,3,5-triaza-7-phosphaadamantane ligand, PTA, is highly versitile as it enables the synthesis of water-soluble complexes without the additional complication of introducing a charged species to the complex. Numerous PTA complexes exhibiting catalytic activity have been reported in the last few years underlining the world-wide interest in its unique characteristics (Darensbourg et al., 1994, 1995; Joó et al., 1996). While platinum(II) and palladium(II) complex containing three or more PTA ligands are fairly soluble in water and even methanol, the bis PTA complexes are only soluble to a limited extent in water and almost insoluble in methanol. No mono PTA complexes of platinum(II) and palladium(II) are reported to date. \sch
In this paper we report the structure of trans-diiodobis(PTA)platinum(II) as part of our systematic investigation to the basic coordination mode and solution properties of these complexes. Only a few platinum(II) bis PTA structures have been reported to date (Assefa et al., 1995; Darensbourg et al., 1997; Otto et al., 1998) and the title compound describes only the second example of such a complex with a trans geometry.
The compound crystallizes on an inversion centre as well defined square planar moieties with the phosphine ligands in a trans orientation. All angles in the coordination polyhedron are very close to the ideal 90° with P—Pt—I 90.94 (3) and Pi—Pt—I 89.06 (3)°, respectively. The P—Pt—Pi and I—Pt—Ii angles are 180° on accord of the symmetry [(i) -x, -y, -z].
All bond distances and angles are within normal ranges and are very similar to those in analogous diiodo bisphosphine complex listed in Table 1. The Pt—I bond distance do not seem to be very sensitive to the phosphine ligand employed in the different structures with the distances ranging between 2.599 (2) and 2.626 (2) Å. Both the Pt—P and Pt—I bond distances of 2.3128 (12) and 2.6022 (6) Å are virtually identical to those found in the analogous PMe3 complex of 2.315 (4) and 2.599 (2), respectively, indicative of the closely resembling characteristics of these two ligand systems. The Pt—P bond distances are comparable with the 2.318 (2) Å found for the corresponding PPh3 complex while they are shorter than those found for the bulkier PCy3 and P(o-Tol)3 complexes. The Pt—P bond distances of the title compound are very similar to those found in other Pt complexes containing two PTA ligands in a trans orientation and even the 2.323 (2) and 2.3174 (11) Å found in the [PtCl(PTA)3]Cl and [Pt(I)2(PTA)3] complexes containing 3 PTA ligands.
The average C—P—Pt and C—P—C angles of 119.21 (16) and 98.1 (2) ° respectively are indicative of the small steric demand of the PTA ligand. In addition to this the effective- and Tolman cone angles for the PTA ligand in the title compound were determined as 117.3 and 118.2°, respectively, using the actual Pt—P bond distance of 2.3128 (11) and a distance of 2.28 Å according to the definition (Tolman, 1977; Otto et al., 2000). These values are in excellent agreement with the 118.3 and 119.5° reported recently (Otto & Roodt, 2001), confirming the rigid character of the ligand.