Download citation
Download citation
link to html
In the title compound, C13H11N3O3, the mol­ecule is essentially planar, the dihedral angle between the benzene rings being 5.31 (10)°. The nitro group meta to the phenyl­hydrazone substituent is almost coplanar with the ring to which it is attached, with a dihedral angle of 3.09 (12)° between the plane of the nitro group and the phenol ring plane. In the crystal structure, inter­molecular N—H...O and C—H...O inter­actions inter­connect the mol­ecules into a three-dimensional framework. In addition, the crystal packing is stabilized by weak π–π inter­actions [centroid–centroid distance = 3.7279 (11) Å].

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S160053680701817X/sj2291sup1.cif
Contains datablocks I, global

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S160053680701817X/sj2291Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

CCDC reference: 647596

Key indicators

  • Single-crystal X-ray study
  • T = 100 K
  • Mean [sigma](C-C)= 0.003 Å
  • R factor = 0.068
  • wR factor = 0.152
  • Data-to-parameter ratio = 19.3

checkCIF/PLATON results

No syntax errors found


No errors found in this datablock

Comment top

Several phenylhydrazone derivatives have been reported and were found to have versatile coordinating abilities towards different metal ions (Raj et al., 2006). Some of these compounds were used as monitors or detectors for formaldehyde (Suliman et al., 2001) and are also used to determine airbone aldehydes and ketones (Vogel et al., 2000). Phenylhydrazone and nitrophenylhydrazone derivatives have also been synthesized in our laboratory in order to investigate their structures and analytical application. The title compound (I) whose structure is reported here, (Fig. 1) is one of the series of related phenylhdrazone derivatives that we have prepared; the X-ray structures of two of this series have been studied previously (Tameem et al., 2006; Tameem et al., 2007).

The bond lengths and angles in (I) have normal values (Allen et al., 1987) and are comparable with those in the related structures (Shan et al., 2003; Shan et al., 2004). The molecule is essentially planar with the dihedral angle between the two benzene rings (C1—C6 and C8—C13) being 5.31 (10)°. The nitro group in the title compound, benzaldehyde 2-nitro-5-hydroxyphenylhydrazone, is attached at C10, meta to the phenylhydrazone substituent in the phenol ring [torsion angle of O2—N3—C10—C11 = -2.7 (3)°]. However, the corresponding nitro group in salicylaldehyde 4-nitrophenylhydrazone (Shan et al., 2003) is attached at C4 in para-position to the hydrazone group [torsion angle of O1—N1—C4—C5 = -6.2 (5)°].

An intramolecular O1—H1B···N2 interaction (Table 1 and Figure 1) generates an S(6) ring motif (Bernstein et al., 1995). In the crystal structure, the molecules are linked by intermolecular N1—H1C···O3i and C9—H9A···O1ii interactions into a three-dimensional framework (Figure 2). In addition, the crystal packing is stabilized by weak intermolecular π···π interactions involving the C8—C13 (Centroid Cg1) benzene ring with a Cg1···Cg1iii distance of 3.7279 (11)Å [symmetry code: (iii) 1 - x, 2 - y, -z].

Related literature top

For related literature on hydrogen-bond motifs, see Bernstein et al. (1995) and on values of bond lengths and angles, see Allen et al. (1987). For related structures, see Shan et al. (2003); Shan et al. (2004); Tameem et al., 2006; Tameem et al., 2007. For related literature, see: Raj & Kurup (2006); Suliman & Soma (2002); Vogel et al. (2000).

Experimental top

The title compound (I) was prepared by the slow addition of phenylhydrazine (350 mg, 3.2 mmol) dissolved in 5 ml concentrated sulfuric acid to a 2-hydroxy-5-nitrobenzaldehyde (540 mg, 3.2 mmol) dissloved in 20 ml of 95% ethanol. The mixture was stirred for 15 min, and then left to stand at room temperature form 30 min. The resulting product was filtered off and washed with 20 ml 95% ethanol and an orange powder product was collected. Crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction analysis were grown by the slow evaporation of a saturated solution of the resultant product in ethanol.

Refinement top

The H atoms on the N and O atoms were located in a difference map and refined isotropically, with N—H = 0.85 (2)Å and O—H = 0.85 (3) Å. The remaining H atoms were positioned geometrically and treated as riding, with C—H = 0.93Å and the Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C).

Structure description top

Several phenylhydrazone derivatives have been reported and were found to have versatile coordinating abilities towards different metal ions (Raj et al., 2006). Some of these compounds were used as monitors or detectors for formaldehyde (Suliman et al., 2001) and are also used to determine airbone aldehydes and ketones (Vogel et al., 2000). Phenylhydrazone and nitrophenylhydrazone derivatives have also been synthesized in our laboratory in order to investigate their structures and analytical application. The title compound (I) whose structure is reported here, (Fig. 1) is one of the series of related phenylhdrazone derivatives that we have prepared; the X-ray structures of two of this series have been studied previously (Tameem et al., 2006; Tameem et al., 2007).

The bond lengths and angles in (I) have normal values (Allen et al., 1987) and are comparable with those in the related structures (Shan et al., 2003; Shan et al., 2004). The molecule is essentially planar with the dihedral angle between the two benzene rings (C1—C6 and C8—C13) being 5.31 (10)°. The nitro group in the title compound, benzaldehyde 2-nitro-5-hydroxyphenylhydrazone, is attached at C10, meta to the phenylhydrazone substituent in the phenol ring [torsion angle of O2—N3—C10—C11 = -2.7 (3)°]. However, the corresponding nitro group in salicylaldehyde 4-nitrophenylhydrazone (Shan et al., 2003) is attached at C4 in para-position to the hydrazone group [torsion angle of O1—N1—C4—C5 = -6.2 (5)°].

An intramolecular O1—H1B···N2 interaction (Table 1 and Figure 1) generates an S(6) ring motif (Bernstein et al., 1995). In the crystal structure, the molecules are linked by intermolecular N1—H1C···O3i and C9—H9A···O1ii interactions into a three-dimensional framework (Figure 2). In addition, the crystal packing is stabilized by weak intermolecular π···π interactions involving the C8—C13 (Centroid Cg1) benzene ring with a Cg1···Cg1iii distance of 3.7279 (11)Å [symmetry code: (iii) 1 - x, 2 - y, -z].

For related literature on hydrogen-bond motifs, see Bernstein et al. (1995) and on values of bond lengths and angles, see Allen et al. (1987). For related structures, see Shan et al. (2003); Shan et al. (2004); Tameem et al., 2006; Tameem et al., 2007. For related literature, see: Raj & Kurup (2006); Suliman & Soma (2002); Vogel et al. (2000).

Computing details top

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2005); cell refinement: APEX2; data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2005); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 1998); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL; molecular graphics: SHELXTL; software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL, PARST (Nardelli, 1995) and PLATON (Spek, 2003).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The molecular structure of (I), showing 50% probability displacement ellipsoids and the atom numbering. A dashed line indicates an intramolecular hydrogen bond.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. The crystal packing of (I), viewed down the c axis. The intermolecular N—H···O and C—H···O hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed lines. H atoms not involved in hydrogen bonding have been omitted.
2-Hydroxy-5-nitrobenzaldehyde phenylhydrazone top
Crystal data top
C13H11N3O3F(000) = 536
Mr = 257.25Dx = 1.441 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 2685 reflections
a = 12.9019 (5) Åθ = 1.7–30.2°
b = 7.9909 (3) ŵ = 0.11 mm1
c = 12.5323 (5) ÅT = 100 K
β = 113.418 (2)°Plate, orange
V = 1185.63 (8) Å30.35 × 0.29 × 0.03 mm
Z = 4
Data collection top
Bruker SMART APEX2 CCD area-detector
diffractometer
3480 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube2265 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.050
Detector resolution: 8.33 pixels mm-1θmax = 30.2°, θmin = 1.7°
ω scansh = 1816
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2005)
k = 911
Tmin = 0.939, Tmax = 0.997l = 1617
12742 measured reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.068Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.152H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.04 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0569P)2 + 0.5968P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
3480 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
180 parametersΔρmax = 0.42 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.24 e Å3
Crystal data top
C13H11N3O3V = 1185.63 (8) Å3
Mr = 257.25Z = 4
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation
a = 12.9019 (5) ŵ = 0.11 mm1
b = 7.9909 (3) ÅT = 100 K
c = 12.5323 (5) Å0.35 × 0.29 × 0.03 mm
β = 113.418 (2)°
Data collection top
Bruker SMART APEX2 CCD area-detector
diffractometer
3480 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2005)
2265 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.939, Tmax = 0.997Rint = 0.050
12742 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0680 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.152H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.04Δρmax = 0.42 e Å3
3480 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.24 e Å3
180 parameters
Special details top

Experimental. The data was collected with the Oxford Cyrosystem Cobra low-temperature attachment.

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O10.48565 (12)0.68203 (19)0.15079 (12)0.0262 (4)
O20.84393 (11)1.10514 (19)0.05297 (12)0.0308 (4)
O30.73542 (12)1.0344 (2)0.12240 (12)0.0387 (4)
N10.25322 (13)0.5634 (2)0.14691 (14)0.0231 (4)
N20.34887 (12)0.6265 (2)0.06494 (13)0.0200 (4)
N30.76112 (13)1.0327 (2)0.01671 (14)0.0236 (4)
C10.18662 (16)0.4549 (3)0.00323 (16)0.0236 (4)
H1A0.24410.50970.05690.028*
C20.10905 (17)0.3587 (3)0.02002 (18)0.0289 (5)
H2A0.11520.34850.09620.035*
C30.02226 (17)0.2773 (3)0.06842 (19)0.0302 (5)
H3A0.02870.21120.05170.036*
C40.01232 (17)0.2953 (3)0.18153 (18)0.0283 (5)
H4A0.04670.24280.24150.034*
C50.08898 (16)0.3903 (2)0.20658 (17)0.0235 (4)
H5A0.08140.40190.28320.028*
C60.17827 (15)0.4695 (2)0.11688 (16)0.0205 (4)
C70.41932 (15)0.7005 (2)0.09859 (15)0.0200 (4)
H7A0.40460.70610.17740.024*
C80.52188 (15)0.7755 (2)0.01390 (15)0.0184 (4)
C90.59248 (15)0.8645 (2)0.05285 (16)0.0197 (4)
H9A0.57490.87410.13210.024*
C100.68939 (15)0.9392 (2)0.02689 (16)0.0194 (4)
C110.71885 (15)0.9287 (2)0.14548 (16)0.0218 (4)
H11A0.78420.97990.19740.026*
C120.64949 (15)0.8409 (3)0.18517 (16)0.0227 (4)
H12A0.66840.83200.26470.027*
C130.55093 (15)0.7649 (2)0.10712 (15)0.0199 (4)
H1C0.2504 (16)0.564 (3)0.2155 (19)0.017 (5)*
H1B0.431 (2)0.649 (3)0.090 (2)0.051 (8)*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0238 (7)0.0336 (9)0.0177 (7)0.0076 (6)0.0046 (6)0.0003 (6)
O20.0240 (7)0.0339 (9)0.0311 (8)0.0097 (6)0.0073 (6)0.0029 (7)
O30.0321 (8)0.0616 (12)0.0211 (7)0.0113 (8)0.0091 (6)0.0048 (7)
N10.0214 (8)0.0300 (10)0.0143 (8)0.0056 (7)0.0033 (6)0.0018 (7)
N20.0170 (7)0.0214 (9)0.0170 (7)0.0004 (6)0.0019 (6)0.0022 (6)
N30.0196 (8)0.0263 (9)0.0234 (8)0.0011 (7)0.0071 (7)0.0024 (7)
C10.0181 (9)0.0245 (11)0.0221 (9)0.0020 (8)0.0016 (7)0.0010 (8)
C20.0258 (10)0.0342 (13)0.0253 (10)0.0001 (9)0.0088 (8)0.0036 (9)
C30.0234 (10)0.0261 (11)0.0386 (12)0.0028 (9)0.0096 (9)0.0031 (9)
C40.0208 (10)0.0227 (11)0.0329 (11)0.0031 (8)0.0017 (8)0.0033 (9)
C50.0223 (9)0.0219 (10)0.0200 (9)0.0002 (8)0.0018 (7)0.0007 (8)
C60.0183 (9)0.0180 (9)0.0217 (9)0.0011 (7)0.0042 (7)0.0002 (8)
C70.0188 (9)0.0231 (10)0.0147 (8)0.0021 (8)0.0030 (7)0.0004 (7)
C80.0176 (8)0.0182 (9)0.0163 (8)0.0033 (7)0.0034 (7)0.0002 (7)
C90.0201 (9)0.0211 (10)0.0168 (8)0.0030 (8)0.0063 (7)0.0004 (7)
C100.0161 (8)0.0199 (10)0.0220 (9)0.0022 (7)0.0072 (7)0.0013 (8)
C110.0170 (9)0.0220 (10)0.0211 (9)0.0007 (8)0.0020 (7)0.0000 (8)
C120.0219 (9)0.0283 (11)0.0135 (8)0.0001 (8)0.0025 (7)0.0004 (8)
C130.0194 (9)0.0206 (10)0.0183 (9)0.0021 (8)0.0062 (7)0.0017 (7)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
O1—C131.347 (2)C4—C51.379 (3)
O1—H1B0.85 (3)C4—H4A0.9300
O2—N31.224 (2)C5—C61.401 (3)
O3—N31.231 (2)C5—H5A0.9300
N1—N21.351 (2)C7—C81.456 (2)
N1—C61.389 (3)C7—H7A0.9300
N1—H1C0.85 (2)C8—C91.389 (3)
N2—C71.288 (2)C8—C131.413 (2)
N3—C101.454 (2)C9—C101.387 (2)
C1—C21.382 (3)C9—H9A0.9300
C1—C61.390 (3)C10—C111.383 (3)
C1—H1A0.9300C11—C121.376 (3)
C2—C31.385 (3)C11—H11A0.9300
C2—H2A0.9300C12—C131.398 (2)
C3—C41.379 (3)C12—H12A0.9300
C3—H3A0.9300
C13—O1—H1B103.0 (19)N1—C6—C5117.75 (17)
N2—N1—C6121.31 (16)C1—C6—C5119.26 (18)
N2—N1—H1C115.4 (14)N2—C7—C8120.37 (17)
C6—N1—H1C121.6 (14)N2—C7—H7A119.8
C7—N2—N1118.22 (16)C8—C7—H7A119.8
O2—N3—O3123.23 (17)C9—C8—C13118.48 (16)
O2—N3—C10118.71 (16)C9—C8—C7119.19 (16)
O3—N3—C10118.06 (15)C13—C8—C7122.30 (17)
C2—C1—C6119.67 (18)C10—C9—C8119.77 (17)
C2—C1—H1A120.2C10—C9—H9A120.1
C6—C1—H1A120.2C8—C9—H9A120.1
C1—C2—C3121.0 (2)C11—C10—C9122.15 (18)
C1—C2—H2A119.5C11—C10—N3119.41 (16)
C3—C2—H2A119.5C9—C10—N3118.44 (17)
C4—C3—C2119.3 (2)C12—C11—C10118.63 (17)
C4—C3—H3A120.4C12—C11—H11A120.7
C2—C3—H3A120.4C10—C11—H11A120.7
C5—C4—C3120.63 (19)C11—C12—C13120.66 (17)
C5—C4—H4A119.7C11—C12—H12A119.7
C3—C4—H4A119.7C13—C12—H12A119.7
C4—C5—C6120.11 (19)O1—C13—C12118.11 (16)
C4—C5—H5A119.9O1—C13—C8121.58 (16)
C6—C5—H5A119.9C12—C13—C8120.31 (18)
N1—C6—C1122.96 (16)
C6—N1—N2—C7174.30 (18)C8—C9—C10—C110.2 (3)
C6—C1—C2—C30.5 (3)C8—C9—C10—N3179.55 (17)
C1—C2—C3—C41.1 (3)O2—N3—C10—C112.7 (3)
C2—C3—C4—C51.3 (3)O3—N3—C10—C11177.10 (18)
C3—C4—C5—C60.2 (3)O2—N3—C10—C9176.73 (17)
N2—N1—C6—C110.0 (3)O3—N3—C10—C93.5 (3)
N2—N1—C6—C5171.80 (18)C9—C10—C11—C120.1 (3)
C2—C1—C6—N1179.80 (19)N3—C10—C11—C12179.47 (17)
C2—C1—C6—C52.0 (3)C10—C11—C12—C130.4 (3)
C4—C5—C6—N1179.86 (18)C11—C12—C13—O1179.33 (18)
C4—C5—C6—C11.8 (3)C11—C12—C13—C80.8 (3)
N1—N2—C7—C8177.97 (17)C9—C8—C13—O1179.28 (17)
N2—C7—C8—C9175.53 (18)C7—C8—C13—O11.1 (3)
N2—C7—C8—C132.7 (3)C9—C8—C13—C120.9 (3)
C13—C8—C9—C100.5 (3)C7—C8—C13—C12179.07 (18)
C7—C8—C9—C10178.80 (18)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1—H1B···N20.85 (2)1.81 (2)2.613 (2)156 (2)
N1—H1C···O3i0.85 (2)2.12 (2)2.961 (2)170 (2)
C9—H9A···O1ii0.932.543.430 (2)161
Symmetry codes: (i) x+1, y1/2, z1/2; (ii) x, y+3/2, z1/2.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC13H11N3O3
Mr257.25
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/c
Temperature (K)100
a, b, c (Å)12.9019 (5), 7.9909 (3), 12.5323 (5)
β (°) 113.418 (2)
V3)1185.63 (8)
Z4
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)0.11
Crystal size (mm)0.35 × 0.29 × 0.03
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker SMART APEX2 CCD area-detector
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2005)
Tmin, Tmax0.939, 0.997
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
12742, 3480, 2265
Rint0.050
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.708
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.068, 0.152, 1.04
No. of reflections3480
No. of parameters180
H-atom treatmentH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.42, 0.24

Computer programs: APEX2 (Bruker, 2005), APEX2, SAINT (Bruker, 2005), SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 1998), SHELXTL, PARST (Nardelli, 1995) and PLATON (Spek, 2003).

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1—H1B···N20.85 (2)1.81 (2)2.613 (2)156 (2)
N1—H1C···O3i0.85 (2)2.12 (2)2.961 (2)170 (2)
C9—H9A···O1ii0.932.543.430 (2)161
Symmetry codes: (i) x+1, y1/2, z1/2; (ii) x, y+3/2, z1/2.
 

Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds