Buy article online - an online subscription or single-article purchase is required to access this article.
Download citation
Download citation
link to html
The 100 K crystal structure of the title compound, [Cu(C3H4NO3)2­(H2O)2], is composed of discrete [Cu(hipa)2(H2O)2] units (hipa = 2-hydroxy­imino­propionate). The CuII atom lies on an inversion centre and exhibits a slightly distorted octa­hedral coordination geometry formed by two chelating bidentate hipa ligands occupying equatorial sites and two water mol­ecules in axial positions. The hipa ligands are bound to the copper centre in a trans fashion, generating a planar {Cu(hipa)2} core with the six-membered chelate rings having Cu—O and Cu—N distances of 1.9421 (13) and 2.0488 (15) Å, respectively, and N—Cu—O bite angles of 80.70 (6)°. The bonding parameters agree with those of the 298 K crystal structure of the title compound, which has been deposited at the Cambridge Structural Database (refcode IGUZAL) [Holt (2002). Private communication to the Cambridge Structural Database. Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, Cambridge, England] but remained unpublished. In the title compound, each water mol­ecule acts as both an inter­molecular hydrogen-bond donor (to the carboxyl­ate O atoms) or acceptor (of hydrogen from the hydroxyl oxygen), thus multiply linking neighbouring mononuclear units and forming polymeric hydrogen-bonded two-dimensional layers. They are further extended by means of weak inter­molecular C—H...O hydrogen bonds between methyl groups and the hydroxyl O atoms of hipa. The shortest Cu...Cu separations within these layers are equal to the unit-cell dimensions. The hipa ligands in the title compound are derived from a copper-promoted fragmentation of N-hydr­oxy-2,2′-imino­dipropionic acid.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S160053680702226X/si2012sup1.cif
Contains datablocks I, global

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S160053680702226X/si2012Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

CCDC reference: 650677

Key indicators

  • Single-crystal X-ray study
  • T = 100 K
  • Mean [sigma](C-C) = 0.003 Å
  • R factor = 0.025
  • wR factor = 0.064
  • Data-to-parameter ratio = 14.2

checkCIF/PLATON results

No syntax errors found



Alert level G PLAT794_ALERT_5_G Check Predicted Bond Valency for Cu1 (2) 2.15
0 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem 0 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem 0 ALERT level C = Check and explain 1 ALERT level G = General alerts; check 0 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 0 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 0 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 0 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion 1 ALERT type 5 Informative message, check
checkCIF publication errors
Alert level A PUBL024_ALERT_1_A The number of authors is greater than 5. Please specify the role of each of the co-authors for your paper.
Author Response: Specification of the role of each of the co-authors: MVK and AMK - preparation and crystallisation of the complex; MH - performance of the X-ray analysis; JALS - supervision of the Ph.D. work of MVK, planning and discussion of the results; JJRFS - planning and discussion of the results; AJLP - supervision of the Ph.D. work of AMK, planning and discussion of the results.

1 ALERT level A = Data missing that is essential or data in wrong format 0 ALERT level G = General alerts. Data that may be required is missing

Comment top

The N-hydroxy-2,2'-iminodipropionic acid (H3hidpa), HON(CH(CH3)COOH2, constitutes, in its basic form hidpa3-, the ligand in Amavadine (Berry et al., 1999), a natural bare vanadium(IV) complex [V(hidpa)2]2- which is present in some Amanita fungi and has been applied as an efficient catalyst in various alkane functionalization reactions (Reis et al., 2005). Hence, in pursuit of these and other studies, namely focusing on the self-assembly synthesis of copper(II) complexes with various N,O-ligands and their application in catalysis (Kirillov et al., 2006; Nesterov et al., 2006), we have attempted the preparation of the copper compound structurally related to Amavadine. However, the reaction of Cu(NO3)2×2.5H2O with H3hidpa in methanol and at room temperature resulted in the formation of the title compound, (I), due to the fragmentation of H3hidpa to give 2-hydroxyiminopropionate, HON=C(CH3)COO- (hipa). Such a type of fragmentation is unusual or even unknown, although other examples of H3hidpa fragmentations promoted by Re or Mo centres have already been described (Harben et al., 1997; Kirillov, Haukka et al., 2005). Herein we report the synthesis of compound (I) and its characterization by IR spectroscopy, elemental and low-temperature (100 K) single-crystal X-ray diffraction analyses.

The crystal structure of (I) (Fig. 1) is composed of discrete monomeric units, with a slightly distorted centrosymmetric octahedral geometry formed by two bidentate hipa ligands occupying equatorial sites and two water molecules in apical positions. Most of the bonding parameters in (I) (Table 1) agree with those of the related copper compounds (Malek et al., 2004; Dobosz et al., 1999) bearing hipa or derived moieties.

In (I), each water oxygen atom (O4) acts as both an intermolecular hydrogen-bond donor (to the carboxylate oxygen atoms O2 and O3) or acceptor (of hydrogen from the hydroxo oxygen O1) (Table 2), thus multiply linking the neighbouring mononuclear units and forming polymeric H-bonded chains (if seen along the a or b axis, Fig. 2a) or two-dimensional layers (if seen along the c axis, Fig. 2 b). These chains and layers are further extended by means of the weak intermolecular C2—H2C···O1 interactions resulting in a three-dimensional hydrogen bonded network.

Related literature top

For general background, see: Berry et al. (1999); Reis et al. (2005); Kirillov et al. (2006); Nesterov et al. (2006). For related structures, see: Malek et al. (2004); Dobosz et al. (1999). For examples of the fragmentation of N-hydroxy-2,2'-iminodipropionic acid, see: Kirillov et al. (2005); Harben et al. (1997). Further details are given as supplementary material (see Comment).

Experimental top

To a methanolic solution (5 ml) of Cu(NO3)2×2.5H2O (58 mg, 0.25 mmol) was added N-hydroxy-2,2'-iminodipropionic acid (44 mg, 0.25 mmol) with continuous stirring at room temperature. The reaction mixture was stirred overnight and then filtered. The filtrate was left in a vial to evaporate in air at ambient temperature. Green X-ray quality crystals were formed in several days and were collected and dried in air (yield 26%, based on copper nitrate). Analysis calculated for C6H12CuN2O8: C 23.73, H 3.98, N 9.22; found: C 23.77, H 4.10, N 8.84%. FT—IR, selected bands, cm-1: 3306 [s,br, ν(H2O)+ν(OH)], 2796 [w, ν(CH)], 1678 [s,br, νas(COO)+ν(C=N)], 1460 and 1361 [s, νs(COO)], 1386 [w, δ(CH3)], 1077 [s, ν(NO)].

Refinement top

The hydrogen atoms H1O, H4A and H4B were located from the difference Fourier map. The H1O atom was refined isotropically and but the H4A and H4B atoms but were constrained to ride on their parent atom, with Uiso = 1.5 Ueq(parent atom). Other H atoms were positioned geometrically and were also constrained to ride on their parent atoms, with C—H = 0.98 Å, and Uiso = 1.5 Ueq(parent atom). The highest peak is located 0.75 Å from atom C1 and the deepest hole is located 0.81 Å from atom Cu1.

Structure description top

The N-hydroxy-2,2'-iminodipropionic acid (H3hidpa), HON(CH(CH3)COOH2, constitutes, in its basic form hidpa3-, the ligand in Amavadine (Berry et al., 1999), a natural bare vanadium(IV) complex [V(hidpa)2]2- which is present in some Amanita fungi and has been applied as an efficient catalyst in various alkane functionalization reactions (Reis et al., 2005). Hence, in pursuit of these and other studies, namely focusing on the self-assembly synthesis of copper(II) complexes with various N,O-ligands and their application in catalysis (Kirillov et al., 2006; Nesterov et al., 2006), we have attempted the preparation of the copper compound structurally related to Amavadine. However, the reaction of Cu(NO3)2×2.5H2O with H3hidpa in methanol and at room temperature resulted in the formation of the title compound, (I), due to the fragmentation of H3hidpa to give 2-hydroxyiminopropionate, HON=C(CH3)COO- (hipa). Such a type of fragmentation is unusual or even unknown, although other examples of H3hidpa fragmentations promoted by Re or Mo centres have already been described (Harben et al., 1997; Kirillov, Haukka et al., 2005). Herein we report the synthesis of compound (I) and its characterization by IR spectroscopy, elemental and low-temperature (100 K) single-crystal X-ray diffraction analyses.

The crystal structure of (I) (Fig. 1) is composed of discrete monomeric units, with a slightly distorted centrosymmetric octahedral geometry formed by two bidentate hipa ligands occupying equatorial sites and two water molecules in apical positions. Most of the bonding parameters in (I) (Table 1) agree with those of the related copper compounds (Malek et al., 2004; Dobosz et al., 1999) bearing hipa or derived moieties.

In (I), each water oxygen atom (O4) acts as both an intermolecular hydrogen-bond donor (to the carboxylate oxygen atoms O2 and O3) or acceptor (of hydrogen from the hydroxo oxygen O1) (Table 2), thus multiply linking the neighbouring mononuclear units and forming polymeric H-bonded chains (if seen along the a or b axis, Fig. 2a) or two-dimensional layers (if seen along the c axis, Fig. 2 b). These chains and layers are further extended by means of the weak intermolecular C2—H2C···O1 interactions resulting in a three-dimensional hydrogen bonded network.

For general background, see: Berry et al. (1999); Reis et al. (2005); Kirillov et al. (2006); Nesterov et al. (2006). For related structures, see: Malek et al. (2004); Dobosz et al. (1999). For examples of the fragmentation of N-hydroxy-2,2'-iminodipropionic acid, see: Kirillov et al. (2005); Harben et al. (1997). Further details are given as supplementary material (see Comment).

Computing details top

Data collection: Collect (Bruker, 2004 or Nonius, 1998?); cell refinement: DENZO/SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997); data reduction: DENZO/SCALEPACK; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2006); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The molecular structure of the title compound, showing the atom-labeling scheme. The suffixes A correspond to the symmetry position (-x, -y, -z). Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level. H atoms are represented by circles of arbitrary radii.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. Ball-and-stick partial representation of the crystal packing of compound (I), viewed down the a (a) and c (b) axis, with hydrogen-bonding network (dashed lines). H atoms are omitted for clarity. Cu, green; N, blue; O, red; C, grey.
Diaquabis(2-hydroxyiminopropionato-κ2N,O)copper(II) top
Crystal data top
[Cu(C3H4NO3)2(H2O)2]Z = 1
Mr = 303.72F(000) = 155
Triclinic, P1Dx = 1.903 Mg m3
Hall symbol: -P 1Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 4.8204 (3) ÅCell parameters from 2320 reflections
b = 6.5447 (4) Åθ = 3.9–27.4°
c = 8.7092 (6) ŵ = 2.10 mm1
α = 87.413 (4)°T = 100 K
β = 88.565 (5)°Plate, pale green
γ = 74.939 (5)°0.37 × 0.14 × 0.07 mm
V = 265.02 (3) Å3
Data collection top
Nonius KappaCCD
diffractometer
1207 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1170 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Horizontally mounted graphite crystal monochromatorRint = 0.015
Detector resolution: 9 pixels mm-1θmax = 27.4°, θmin = 3.9°
φ scans and ω scans with κ offseth = 66
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(XPREP in SHELXTL; Sheldrick, 2001)
k = 88
Tmin = 0.509, Tmax = 0.867l = 1111
2320 measured reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.025Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.064H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.10 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0274P)2 + 0.2627P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1207 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
85 parametersΔρmax = 0.42 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.56 e Å3
Crystal data top
[Cu(C3H4NO3)2(H2O)2]γ = 74.939 (5)°
Mr = 303.72V = 265.02 (3) Å3
Triclinic, P1Z = 1
a = 4.8204 (3) ÅMo Kα radiation
b = 6.5447 (4) ŵ = 2.10 mm1
c = 8.7092 (6) ÅT = 100 K
α = 87.413 (4)°0.37 × 0.14 × 0.07 mm
β = 88.565 (5)°
Data collection top
Nonius KappaCCD
diffractometer
1207 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(XPREP in SHELXTL; Sheldrick, 2001)
1170 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.509, Tmax = 0.867Rint = 0.015
2320 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0250 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.064H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.10Δρmax = 0.42 e Å3
1207 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.56 e Å3
85 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Cu10.00000.00000.00000.01113 (12)
O10.3635 (3)0.0415 (2)0.29803 (15)0.0142 (3)
H1O0.430 (6)0.118 (4)0.235 (3)0.030 (7)*
O20.1815 (3)0.4394 (2)0.24723 (16)0.0161 (3)
O30.1601 (3)0.2297 (2)0.05499 (15)0.0128 (3)
O40.3956 (3)0.2557 (2)0.11946 (15)0.0133 (3)
N10.1846 (3)0.0563 (2)0.21363 (18)0.0106 (3)
C10.1067 (4)0.1993 (3)0.2845 (2)0.0112 (3)
C20.1950 (4)0.2699 (3)0.4424 (2)0.0163 (4)
H2A0.34980.20800.47980.025*
H2B0.26300.42470.44060.025*
H2C0.03020.22350.51090.025*
C30.0944 (4)0.3002 (3)0.1904 (2)0.0112 (3)
H4A0.50750.31290.04720.017*
H4B0.30830.34610.15420.017*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cu10.01162 (18)0.01280 (17)0.01097 (17)0.00651 (12)0.00254 (11)0.00354 (11)
O10.0156 (7)0.0183 (7)0.0128 (6)0.0118 (5)0.0037 (5)0.0022 (5)
O20.0209 (7)0.0152 (7)0.0158 (7)0.0105 (6)0.0016 (5)0.0044 (5)
O30.0136 (7)0.0149 (6)0.0119 (6)0.0072 (5)0.0027 (5)0.0034 (5)
O40.0127 (7)0.0140 (6)0.0148 (6)0.0065 (5)0.0027 (5)0.0019 (5)
N10.0090 (7)0.0126 (7)0.0109 (7)0.0045 (6)0.0013 (5)0.0006 (6)
C10.0102 (9)0.0117 (8)0.0117 (8)0.0028 (7)0.0002 (6)0.0012 (6)
C20.0192 (10)0.0186 (9)0.0129 (9)0.0076 (8)0.0034 (7)0.0054 (7)
C30.0100 (8)0.0108 (8)0.0127 (8)0.0023 (6)0.0003 (6)0.0007 (6)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Cu1—O31.9421 (13)O3—C31.288 (2)
Cu1—O3i1.9421 (13)O4—H4A0.8527
Cu1—N1i2.0487 (15)O4—H4B0.8519
Cu1—N12.0488 (15)N1—C11.282 (2)
Cu1—O4i2.4090 (14)C1—C21.488 (2)
Cu1—O42.4090 (14)C1—C31.514 (2)
O1—N11.3805 (19)C2—H2A0.9800
O1—H1O0.88 (3)C2—H2B0.9800
O2—C31.225 (2)C2—H2C0.9800
O3—Cu1—O3i180Cu1—O4—H4B99.7
O3—Cu1—N1i99.31 (6)H4A—O4—H4B107.3
O3i—Cu1—N1i80.69 (6)C1—N1—O1114.50 (15)
O3—Cu1—N180.69 (6)C1—N1—Cu1114.06 (12)
O3i—Cu1—N199.31 (6)O1—N1—Cu1131.30 (11)
N1i—Cu1—N1180N1—C1—C2126.73 (17)
O3—Cu1—O4i89.28 (5)N1—C1—C3113.30 (15)
O3i—Cu1—O4i90.72 (5)C2—C1—C3119.97 (16)
N1i—Cu1—O4i88.44 (5)C1—C2—H2A109.5
N1—Cu1—O4i91.56 (5)C1—C2—H2B109.5
O3—Cu1—O490.72 (5)H2A—C2—H2B109.5
O3i—Cu1—O489.28 (5)C1—C2—H2C109.5
N1i—Cu1—O491.56 (5)H2A—C2—H2C109.5
N1—Cu1—O488.44 (5)H2B—C2—H2C109.5
O4i—Cu1—O4180O2—C3—O3125.38 (17)
N1—O1—H1O107.5 (19)O2—C3—C1118.66 (16)
C3—O3—Cu1115.88 (11)O3—C3—C1115.96 (15)
Cu1—O4—H4A106.8
Symmetry code: (i) x, y, z.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1—H1O···O4ii0.88 (3)1.74 (3)2.6207 (19)173 (3)
O4—H4A···O3iii0.852.002.6319 (18)130
O4—H4B···O2iv0.851.822.6638 (18)170
C2—H2C···O1v0.982.573.535 (3)169
Symmetry codes: (ii) x1, y, z; (iii) x+1, y, z; (iv) x, y1, z; (v) x, y, z+1.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula[Cu(C3H4NO3)2(H2O)2]
Mr303.72
Crystal system, space groupTriclinic, P1
Temperature (K)100
a, b, c (Å)4.8204 (3), 6.5447 (4), 8.7092 (6)
α, β, γ (°)87.413 (4), 88.565 (5), 74.939 (5)
V3)265.02 (3)
Z1
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)2.10
Crystal size (mm)0.37 × 0.14 × 0.07
Data collection
DiffractometerNonius KappaCCD
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(XPREP in SHELXTL; Sheldrick, 2001)
Tmin, Tmax0.509, 0.867
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
2320, 1207, 1170
Rint0.015
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.648
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.025, 0.064, 1.10
No. of reflections1207
No. of parameters85
H-atom treatmentH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.42, 0.56

Computer programs: Collect (Bruker, 2004 or Nonius, 1998?), DENZO/SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997), DENZO/SCALEPACK, SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2006), SHELXL97.

Selected geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Cu1—O31.9421 (13)Cu1—O42.4090 (14)
Cu1—N12.0488 (15)
O3—Cu1—N180.69 (6)N1—Cu1—O488.44 (5)
O3—Cu1—O490.72 (5)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1—H1O···O4i0.88 (3)1.74 (3)2.6207 (19)173 (3)
O4—H4A···O3ii0.852.002.6319 (18)130
O4—H4B···O2iii0.851.822.6638 (18)170
C2—H2C···O1iv0.982.573.535 (3)169.2
Symmetry codes: (i) x1, y, z; (ii) x+1, y, z; (iii) x, y1, z; (iv) x, y, z+1.
 

Subscribe to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications

The full text of this article is available to subscribers to the journal.

If you have already registered and are using a computer listed in your registration details, please email support@iucr.org for assistance.

Buy online

You may purchase this article in PDF and/or HTML formats. For purchasers in the European Community who do not have a VAT number, VAT will be added at the local rate. Payments to the IUCr are handled by WorldPay, who will accept payment by credit card in several currencies. To purchase the article, please complete the form below (fields marked * are required), and then click on `Continue'.
E-mail address* 
Repeat e-mail address* 
(for error checking) 

Format*   PDF (US $40)
   HTML (US $40)
   PDF+HTML (US $50)
In order for VAT to be shown for your country javascript needs to be enabled.

VAT number 
(non-UK EC countries only) 
Country* 
 

Terms and conditions of use
Contact us

Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds