research communications\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoSTRUCTURAL BIOLOGY
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2053-230X

Structures of the Plasmodium falciparum heat-shock protein 70-x ATPase domain in complex with chemical fragments identify conserved and unique binding sites

crossmark logo

aDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QU, United Kingdom
*Correspondence e-mail: ioannis.vakonakis@bioch.ox.ac.uk

Edited by S. Sheriff, Bristol-Myers Squibb, USA (Received 1 April 2021; accepted 16 July 2021; online 28 July 2021)

Plasmodium falciparum invades erythrocytes and extensively modifies them in a manner that increases the virulence of this malaria parasite. A single heat-shock 70 kDa-type chaperone, PfHsp70-x, is among the parasite proteins exported to the host cell. PfHsp70-x assists in the formation of a key protein complex that underpins parasite virulence and supports parasite growth during febrile episodes. Previous work resolved the crystallographic structures of the PfHsp70-x ATPase and substrate-binding domains, and showed them to be highly similar to those of their human counterparts. Here, 233 chemical fragments were screened for binding to the PfHsp70-x ATPase domain, resulting in three crystallographic structures of this domain in complex with ligands. Two binding sites were identified, with most ligands binding proximal to the ATPase nucleotide-binding pocket. Although amino acids participating in direct ligand interactions are conserved between the parasite and human erythrocytic chaperones, one nonconserved residue is also present near the ligand. This work suggests that PfHsp70-x features binding sites that may be exploitable by small-molecule ligands towards the specific inhibition of the parasite chaperone.

1. Introduction

Over 400 000 deaths are attributed to malaria each year, primarily in sub-Saharan Africa and among children under the age of five years (World Health Organization, 2019[World Health Organization (2019). Global Tuberculosis Report 2019. Geneva: World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/global-tuberculosis-report-2019.]). Nearly 95% of these deaths are caused by a single parasite species, Plasmodium falciparum. Compared with other human-infective plasmodia, P. falciparum induces a strong virulence phenotype in erythrocytes it invades, which is responsible for severe disease. The parasite exports a complement of nearly 500 proteins to the host cell (Spillman et al., 2015[Spillman, N. J., Beck, J. R. & Goldberg, D. E. (2015). Annu. Rev. Biochem. 84, 813-841.]; Warncke et al., 2016[Warncke, J. D., Vakonakis, I. & Beck, H. P. (2016). Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 80, 905-927.]; Proellocks et al., 2016[Proellocks, N. I., Coppel, R. L., Mohandas, N. & Cooke, B. M. (2016). Adv. Parasitol. 91, 1-86.]; de Koning-Ward et al., 2016[Koning-Ward, T. F. de, Dixon, M. W., Tilley, L. & Gilson, P. R. (2016). Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 14, 494-507.]), among which is the adhesion ligand P. falciparum erythrocyte membrane protein 1 (PfEMP1; Hviid & Jensen, 2015[Hviid, L. & Jensen, A. T. (2015). Adv. Parasitol. 88, 51-84.]). PfEMP1 localizes to the parasitized erythrocyte surface, where it integrates into large `knob'-like complexes (Cutts et al., 2017[Cutts, E. E., Laasch, N., Reiter, D. M., Trenker, R., Slater, L. M., Stansfeld, P. J. & Vakonakis, I. (2017). PLoS Pathog. 13, e1006552.]). The formation of knob-like structures is unique to P. falciparum-infected erythrocytes and leads to parasitized cells adhering to the microvasculature of organs such as the brain and kidneys (`cytoadhesion'), as well as the formation of cell clumps between erythrocytes (`rosetting'). Cytoadhesion and rosetting are beneficial to the parasite as they allow the avoidance of splenic passage, where parasitized erythrocytes may be recognized and destroyed, thereby enhancing parasite growth. However, these properties are deleterious to the host, as they cause blockage of blood vessels, tissue damage from inflammation and oxygen deprivation, and can lead to coma and death (Craig et al., 2012[Craig, A. G., Khairul, M. F. & Patil, P. R. (2012). Malays. J. Med. Sci. 19, 5-18.]; Smith et al., 2013[Smith, J. D., Rowe, J. A., Higgins, M. K. & Lavstsen, T. (2013). Cell. Microbiol. 15, 1976-1983.]).

A single heat-shock 70 kDa-type chaperone, PfHsp70-x (PF3D7_0831700), is present among the parasite proteins exported to the host (Külzer et al., 2012[Külzer, S., Charnaud, S., Dagan, T., Riedel, J., Mandal, P., Pesce, E. R., Blatch, G. L., Crabb, B. S., Gilson, P. R. & Przyborski, J. M. (2012). Cell. Microbiol. 14, 1784-1795.]). Although PfHsp70-x has been shown to be dispensable for parasite viability in cell cultures, removal of this protein reduced the efficiency of PfEMP1 transport to the erythrocyte surface and consequently decreased the cytoadherence of parasitized cells under simulated blood-flow conditions by ∼60% (Charnaud et al., 2017[Charnaud, S. C., Dixon, M. W. A., Nie, C. Q., Chappell, L., Sanders, P. R., Nebl, T., Hanssen, E., Berriman, M., Chan, J. A., Blanch, A. J., Beeson, J. G., Rayner, J. C., Przyborski, J. M., Tilley, L., Crabb, B. S. & Gilson, P. R. (2017). PLoS One, 12, e0181656.]). Further, PfHsp70-x, in concert with Hsp40-type co-chaperones exported by the parasite (Külzer et al., 2012[Külzer, S., Charnaud, S., Dagan, T., Riedel, J., Mandal, P., Pesce, E. R., Blatch, G. L., Crabb, B. S., Gilson, P. R. & Przyborski, J. M. (2012). Cell. Microbiol. 14, 1784-1795.]; Day et al., 2019[Day, J., Passecker, A., Beck, H. P. & Vakonakis, I. (2019). FASEB J. 33, 14611-14624.]; Dutta et al., 2021[Dutta, T., Singh, H., Gestwicki, J. E. & Blatch, G. L. (2021). Cell Stress Chaperones, 26, 355-366.]), is thought to contribute more generally to maintaining homeostasis of proteins exported to the host cell, akin to the general role of Hsp70-type chaperones across the kingdoms of life (Meimaridou et al., 2008[Meimaridou, E., Gooljar, S. B. & Chapple, J. P. (2008). J. Mol. Endocrinol. 42, 1-9.]). The parasite export machinery, comprising a large translocon complex (PTEX; Ho et al., 2018[Ho, C. M., Beck, J. R., Lai, M., Cui, Y., Goldberg, D. E., Egea, P. F. & Zhou, Z. H. (2018). Nature, 561, 70-75.]), may also be assisted by PfHsp70-x as the chaperone has been shown to associate with PTEX in cells (Zhang et al., 2017[Zhang, Q., Ma, C., Oberli, A., Zinz, A., Engels, S. & Przyborski, J. M. (2017). Sci. Rep. 7, 42188.]). Consistent with a broader role for PfHsp70-x in P. falciparum biology, depletion of this chaperone reduced parasite growth by ∼40% during heat-shock conditions that simulated febrile episodes of malaria patients (Day et al., 2019[Day, J., Passecker, A., Beck, H. P. & Vakonakis, I. (2019). FASEB J. 33, 14611-14624.]).

Hsp70 chaperones comprise an N-terminal ATPase domain connected by a short linker to a C-terminal substrate-binding domain (Boorstein et al., 1994[Boorstein, W. R., Ziegelhoffer, T. & Craig, E. A. (1994). J. Mol. Evol. 38, 1-17.]; Meimaridou et al., 2008[Meimaridou, E., Gooljar, S. B. & Chapple, J. P. (2008). J. Mol. Endocrinol. 42, 1-9.]). ATP hydrolysis triggers conformational changes in the chaperone that cause sequential binding, holding and release of exposed hydrophobic segments in target proteins. Crystallographic structures of both the ATPase and substrate-binding domains of PfHsp70-x have been resolved, and showed a very high degree of structural similarity to the equivalent domains of human erythrocytic chaperones (Schmidt & Vakonakis, 2020[Schmidt, J. & Vakonakis, I. (2020). Acta Cryst. F76, 495-500.]; Day et al., 2019[Day, J., Passecker, A., Beck, H. P. & Vakonakis, I. (2019). FASEB J. 33, 14611-14624.]). Despite this similarity, bioinformatics analysis suggested that the PfHsp70-x ATPase domain may possess `druggable' sites for small-molecule interactions that are structurally distinct compared with the equivalent sites in human counterparts (Day et al., 2019[Day, J., Passecker, A., Beck, H. P. & Vakonakis, I. (2019). FASEB J. 33, 14611-14624.]). To test this prediction, we screened chemical fragments for binding to the PfHsp70-x ATPase domain using crystallographic means (Erlanson et al., 2016[Erlanson, D. A., Fesik, S. W., Hubbard, R. E., Jahnke, W. & Jhoti, H. (2016). Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 15, 605-619.]). Here, we report the identification of two small-molecule interaction sites on the ATPase domain of PfHsp70-x and compare these sites across human and parasite Hsp70 chaperones.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Macromolecule production

Production and purification of the PfHsp70-x ATPase domain was performed as described previously (Day et al., 2019[Day, J., Passecker, A., Beck, H. P. & Vakonakis, I. (2019). FASEB J. 33, 14611-14624.]). Briefly, a genetic construct encoding PfHsp70-x residues 29–419 in a pFloat vector (N-terminal His6 tag, HRV 3C protease cleavage site; Rogala et al., 2015[Rogala, K. B., Dynes, N. J., Hatzopoulos, G. N., Yan, J., Pong, S. K., Robinson, C. V., Deane, C. M., Gönczy, P. & Vakonakis, I. (2015). eLife, 4, e07410.]) was transformed into Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) cells (Table 1[link]). The cells were grown in Luria–Bertani medium at 310 K; protein expression was induced using 0.25 mM isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside and was allowed to proceed at 291 K for 18 h. The cells were resuspended in lysis buffer [10 mM Na2HPO4, 2 mM KH2PO4, 2.7 mM KCl, 500 mM NaCl, 0.01%(v/v) Triton X-100, 5 mM ATP, 2 mM MgCl2 pH 7.4] and disrupted by sonication, and the PfHsp70-x ATPase domain was initially purified using a HiTrap TALON metal-affinity column (GE Healthcare Life Sciences). Following cleavage of the His6 tag using HRV 3C protease, further purification was performed by size-exclusion chromatography on a Superdex 75 column (GE Healthcare Life Sciences) equilibrated in crystallographic buffer [20 mM 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazine­ethanesulfonic acid (HEPES) pH 7.4, 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM DTT]. The protein was concentrated by spin ultrafiltration and the concentration was calculated by UV absorption at 280 nm using an extinction coefficient estimated from the amino-acid sequence (Pace et al., 1995[Pace, C. N., Vajdos, F., Fee, L., Grimsley, G. & Gray, T. (1995). Protein Sci. 4, 2411-2423.]).

Table 1
Macromolecule-production information

Source organism Plasmodium falciparum (isolate 3D7)
Gene hsp70-x (PF3D7_0831700, UniProt accession No. K7NTP5)
DNA source Codon-optimized synthetic DNA
Expression vector pFLOAT
Expression host Escherichia coli BL21(DE3)
Complete amino-acid sequence of the construct produced GPAEESEVAIGIDLGTTYSCVGICRNGVVDIIANDQGNRTTPSYVAFTDTERLIGDAAKNQASRNPENTVFDAKRLIGRKFSETTVQSDMKHWPFTVKGGSDGKPMIEVSYQGEKKTFHPEEISSMVLKKMKEVAETYLGKPVKNAVITVPAYFNDSQRQATKDAGAIAGLNVLRIINEPTAAAIAYGLDKKGKGEQNILIFDLGGGTFDVSLLTLEDGIFEVKATSGDTHLGGEDFDNKLVNFCVQDFKKKNGGKDVSKNSKSLRRLRTQCEKAKRVLSSSAQATIEVDSLFDGIDYNVNITRAKFEELCMDQFRNTLIPVEKVLKDAKMDKSQVHEIVLVGGSTRIPKIQQLIKDFFNGKEPCKAINPDEAVAYGAAVQAAILSGDQSSAV

2.2. Crystallization and fragment-screening setup

Diffraction-quality crystals were obtained in large numbers using the sitting-drop vapour-diffusion method (Table 2[link]) in trays set up using a Mosquito robot (TTP Labtech). Crystals appeared in under two days and continued to evolve for a total of 7–10 days.

Table 2
Crystallization

Method Vapour diffusion, sitting drop
Temperature (K) 293
Protein concentration (mg ml−1) 15
Buffer composition of protein solution 20 mM HEPES pH 7.4, 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM DTT, 3.5 mM AMP-PNP
Composition of reservoir solution 24%(w/v) PEG 1500, 20%(v/v) glycerol
Volume and ratio of drop 100 nl, 1:1 protein:reservoir solution
Volume of reservoir (µl) 40

Crystal soaking with solutions of fragments was performed using the integrated pipeline in the XChem laboratory at Diamond Light Source. An initial evaluation showed that the majority of PfHsp70-x ATPase domain crystals retained good diffraction characteristics following the addition of up to 20%(v/v) dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) to the crystallization drop and incubation for up to 3 h. Fragments from the DSI-poised (Cox et al., 2016[Cox, O. B., Krojer, T., Collins, P., Monteiro, O., Talon, R., Bradley, A., Fedorov, O., Amin, J., Marsden, B. D., Spencer, J., von Delft, F. & Brennan, P. E. (2016). Chem. Sci. 7, 2322-2330.]) and FragLite (Wood et al., 2019[Wood, D. J., Lopez-Fernandez, J. D., Knight, L. E., Al-Khawaldeh, I., Gai, C., Lin, S., Martin, M. P., Miller, D. C., Cano, C., Endicott, J. A., Hardcastle, I. R., Noble, M. E. M. & Waring, M. J. (2019). J. Med. Chem. 62, 3741-3752.]) chemical libraries at 500 mM concentration in DMSO were added to the crystallization drops to a final concentration of 50.6 mM [10%(v/v) final DMSO concentration] using an Echo liquid-handling robot (Beckman Coulter). The crystals were incubated with fragments for 2–3 h prior to harvesting and rapid cooling in liquid nitrogen. A list of the fragments tested is given in Supplementary Table S1.

2.3. Data collection and processing

Diffraction data were collected on Diamond Light Source (DLS) beamline I04-1 at 100 K to typical resolutions of 2.0–2.6 Å. The data were processed using xia2 (Winter et al., 2013[Winter, G., Lobley, C. M. C. & Prince, S. M. (2013). Acta Cryst. D69, 1260-1273.]). The space group was determined to be P212121, with two copies of the PfHsp70-x ATPase domain per asymmetric unit. The data sets were analysed using PanDDA (Pearce et al., 2017[Pearce, N. M., Krojer, T., Bradley, A. R., Collins, P., Nowak, R. P., Talon, R., Marsden, B. D., Kelm, S., Shi, J., Deane, C. M. & von Delft, F. (2017). Nat. Commun. 8, 15123.]) for the presence of bound ligands (Supplementary Table S1), using a single copy of the crystallographic structure of the PfHsp70-x ATPase domain (PDB entry 6rzq, chain A; Day et al., 2019[Day, J., Passecker, A., Beck, H. P. & Vakonakis, I. (2019). FASEB J. 33, 14611-14624.]) as a reference and a molecular-replacement model. Molecular replacement and initial evaluation of unmodeled electron density was performed by DIMPLE (Wojdyr et al., 2013[Wojdyr, M., Keegan, R., Winter, G. & Ashton, A. (2013). Acta Cryst. A69, s299.]). Data-set statistics for crystals that were evaluated to have bound ligands are shown in Table 3[link].

Table 3
Data collection and processing

Values in parentheses are for the outer shell.

PDB code 7ooe 7oog 7p31
Fragment code JHJ, Z321318226 HEW, NCL-00023823 PYZ, NCL-00023818
Diffraction source I04-1, DLS I04-1, DLS I04-1, DLS
Wavelength (Å) 0.9159 0.9159 0.9159
Temperature (K) 100 100 100
Detector PILATUS 6M-F, Dectris PILATUS 6M-F, Dectris PILATUS 6M-F, Dectris
Space group P212121 P212121 P212121
a, b, c (Å) 80.21, 102.68, 103.83 80.00, 101.01, 103.18 79.98, 102.57, 103.83
α, β, γ (°) 90, 90, 90 90, 90, 90 90, 90, 90
Resolution range (Å) 80.21–2.37 (2.41–2.37) 101.03–2.42 (2.46–2.42) 79.98–2.36 (2.40–2.36)
Completeness (%) 100 (99.0) 100 (99.9) 100 (100.0)
Multiplicity 6.4 (5.9) 6.4 (6.2) 6.5 (6.0)
I/σ(I)〉 12.9 (0.9) 8.5 (0.9) 8.0 (1.0)
Resolution at which 〈I/σ(I)〉 < 2.0 (Å) 2.6 2.7 2.6
CC1/2 1.0 (0.7) 1.0 (0.6) 1.0 (0.5)
Rr.i.m. 0.082 (1.8) 0.117 (2.1) 0.130 (2.2)

2.4. Structure solution and refinement

Structure refinement was performed using BUSTER (Bricogne et al., 2017[Bricogne, G., Blanc, E., Brandl, M., Flensburg, C., Keller, P., Paciorek, W., Roversi, P., Sharff, A., Smart, O. S., Vonrhein, C. & Womack, T. O. (2017). BUSTER. Cambridge: Global Phasing Ltd.]) starting from the complete crystallo­graphic model of the PfHsp70-x ATPase domain (PDB entry 6rzq; Day et al., 2019[Day, J., Passecker, A., Beck, H. P. & Vakonakis, I. (2019). FASEB J. 33, 14611-14624.]), as the data sets were isomorphous in all cases to this earlier model. Model fitting was performed in Coot (Emsley et al., 2010[Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. (2010). Acta Cryst. D66, 486-501.]). Fractional ligand occupancies were refined automatically in BUSTER. In the structure with PDB code 7p31, the fractional occupancy of the ligand I atom was refined separately from the rest of the fragment. Model validation was performed using MolProbity (Chen et al., 2010[Chen, V. B., Arendall, W. B., Headd, J. J., Keedy, D. A., Immormino, R. M., Kapral, G. J., Murray, L. W., Richardson, J. S. & Richardson, D. C. (2010). Acta Cryst. D66, 12-21.]). Figures were prepared using PyMOL (version 2..3.0; Schrodinger). Structure-refinement statistics are shown in Table 4[link].

Table 4
Structure refinement

PDB code 7ooe 7oog 7p31
Fragment code JHJ, Z321318226 HEW, NCL-00023818 PYZ, NCL-00023818
Resolution range (Å) 73.01–2.369 (2.39–2.37) 72.19–2.42 (2.44–2.42) 72.97–2.36 (2.38–2.36)
Completeness (%) 99.9 100 99.9
No. of reflections, working set 35507 (711) 32572 (652) 35772 (716)
No. of reflections, test set 1761 (26) 1609 (23) 1773 (28)
Final Rcryst 0.204 (0.336) 0.209 (0.344) 0.220 (0.337)
Final Rfree 0.236 (0.410) 0.234 (0.333) 0.236 (0.364)
Cruickshank DPI 0.37 0.45 0.38
No. of non-H atoms
 Protein 5898 5885 5852
 Ions ([{\rm PO}_{4}^{3-}], Cl, I, Mg2+) 13 14 13
 Ligand (AMP-PN) 54 54 54
 Ligand (fragments) 36 16 12
 Other ligands (glycerol, PEG) 109 85 43
 Water 118 141 128
 Total 6203 6183 6109
R.m.s. deviations
 Bonds (Å) 0.008 0.008 0.008
 Angles (°) 0.98 0.98 0.97
Average B factors (Å2)
 Protein 91 85 87
 Ion 131 113 104
 Ligand (AMP-PN) 81 62 66
 Ligand (fragments) 75 98 82
 Other ligands (glycerol, PEG) 102 94 95
 Water 66 65 64
Ramachandran plot
 Most favoured (%) 99 99 99
 Allowed (%) 1 1 1

3. Results and discussion

3.1. Crystallographic fragment screening of the PfHsp70-x ATPase domain

We optimized crystallization conditions for the PfHsp70-x ATPase domain, which allowed us to obtain crystals of this protein that diffracted to ∼2.2 Å resolution or better in approximately half of all drops set up. Using the fragment-screening pipeline established in the XChem laboratory at Diamond Light Source, we incubated these crystals with 233 chemical fragments from the DSI-poised (Cox et al., 2016[Cox, O. B., Krojer, T., Collins, P., Monteiro, O., Talon, R., Bradley, A., Fedorov, O., Amin, J., Marsden, B. D., Spencer, J., von Delft, F. & Brennan, P. E. (2016). Chem. Sci. 7, 2322-2330.]) and FragLite (Wood et al., 2019[Wood, D. J., Lopez-Fernandez, J. D., Knight, L. E., Al-Khawaldeh, I., Gai, C., Lin, S., Martin, M. P., Miller, D. C., Cano, C., Endicott, J. A., Hardcastle, I. R., Noble, M. E. M. & Waring, M. J. (2019). J. Med. Chem. 62, 3741-3752.]) libraries and performed X-ray diffraction experiments (Supplementary Table S1). Automated processing of the X-ray data yielded 166 data sets, with 86% of these at 3 Å resolution or better (the highest resolution data set was at 1.85 Å). The overall ∼40% attrition rate of crystals that did not yield useful data could in large part be attributed to the incubation process itself, which exposes the crystals to DMSO; preliminary experiments had shown that ∼25% of crystals thus handled had worsened diffraction characteristics. The remaining losses may correspond to the fragments directly destabilizing crystal packing, for example through binding near protein contact sites in the crystals. These data suggest that performing fragment-screening assays at a lower ligand concentration or with solvents other than DMSO may reveal additional binding partners for the PfHsp70-x ATPase domain.

Diffraction data-set analysis by PanDDA suggested a number of putative binding events, which we followed up by full structure refinement. Three data sets revealed the unambiguous presence of ligands (six binding events in total) and these are described further in this communication (Table 4[link]; 2FoFc and PanDDA electron density of ligands is shown in Supplementary Fig. S1). Ligands may also have been present in a further four data sets, which have provisionally been deposited in the PDB with accession numbers 7nqr, 7nqs, 7nqu and 7nqz pending further investigation, but are not described here. We noted that although crystallization of the PfHsp70-x ATPase domain was performed in the presence of a non­hydrolysable ATP analogue, AMP-PNP, the resulting crystals trapped a hydrolysed nucleotide plus the leaving phosphate group in complex with the chaperone (Supplementary Fig. S2). Our purification process allowed ample time for the hydrolysis of any ATP molecules bound to PfHsp70-x prior to the addition of AMP-PNP, considering the basal ATPase turnover rate of this enzyme (∼0.04 s−1; Day et al., 2019[Day, J., Passecker, A., Beck, H. P. & Vakonakis, I. (2019). FASEB J. 33, 14611-14624.]). Thus, these data suggest that our crystals trapped AMP-PNP hydrolysis events, which have also been observed previously (for example, Suzuki et al., 1997[Suzuki, Y., Shimizu, T., Morii, H. & Tanokura, M. (1997). FEBS Lett. 409, 29-32.]), although we cannot entirely discount the possibility that some ATP molecules may have remained stably bound to the PfHsp70-x throughout the purification process. Further, the ligand PYZ reported in this study (PDB entry 7p31; ligand codes and chemical representations in Supplementary Table S1) featured weaker iodine electron density than would be anticipated, consistent with partial hydrolysis and/or radiolysis of the compound. To model this effect, we refined the fractional occupancies of the PYZ iodine and pyrazole moieties separately, resulting in iodine occupancy values that were lower by 66% and 33% (in chains A and B, respectively) compared with the pyrazole group.

Four out of six fragment-binding events occurred in PfHsp70-x ATPase chain A in the asymmetric unit of the crystals. Chain B featured two binding events that reproduced interactions already observed in chain A. The higher number of binding events noted in chain A is consistent with the lower average B factor of this chain (for example, B factors of 74 Å2 for chain A protein atoms in PDB entry 7ooe versus 108 Å2 for chain B), suggesting a higher level of crystal disorder and consequently lower map quality in chain B. Most binding events (five out of six) clustered at a site proximal to the nucleotide-binding pocket of the ATPase domain, referred to here as site 1 (Fig. 1[link]a). A further binding event (site 2) occurred on a protein `face' perpendicular to site 1 (Fig. 1[link]b). We proceeded to analyse these binding sites in detail.

[Figure 1]
Figure 1
Overview of ligand binding to the PfHsp70-x ATPase domain. Shown here are the two ligand-interaction sites of the ATPase domain of PfHsp70-x identified by crystallographic fragment screening. (a) and (b) display the domain structure in perpendicular views, with the interaction sites highlighted. The main binding site (site 1) is proximal to the ATPase nucleotide-binding pocket. Ligands and the hydrolysed nucleotide bound to this domain, modelled as AMP-PN plus a leaving phosphate group, are shown as sticks.

3.2. Analysis of interaction sites on the PfHsp70-x ATPase domain: site 1

Interaction site 1 of the PfHsp70-x ATPase domain can be subdivided into two subsites separated by a narrow protein `bridge' (Fig. 2[link]a). Subsite A, explored by the ligand PYZ, comprises a narrow but deep pocket formed by ATPase residues Thr42, Lys100, Arg101, Arg105, Tyr179, Thr234 and Thr256 (Fig. 2[link]b). This pocket offers direct access to the departing phosphate group following ATP hydrolysis, which suggests that small molecules binding to this subsite may be able to interfere with the ATPase catalytic cycle, for example by stabilizing the hydrolysed state observed in the crystals and preventing ADP exchange. We noted that all residues forming this pocket are conserved between PfHsp70-x and the main human erythrocytic chaperones Hsp70 (HSPA1A and HSPA1B) and Hsc70 (HSPA8) (Bryk & Wiśniewski, 2017[Bryk, A. H. & Wiśniewski, J. R. (2017). J. Proteome Res. 16, 2752-2761.]); however, residue Thr111, which is located within 5 Å of the bound fragment, is substituted by valine in the human proteins (Supplementary Fig. S3). Thus, although a challenging proposition for ligand design, exploitation of the Thr111 side-chain hydroxyl group may offer an avenue towards increasing binding specificity to the parasite chaperone.

[Figure 2]
Figure 2
Analysis of interaction site 1. (a) Surface representation of the PfHsp70-x site 1, with ligands binding to this site shown as sticks. Site 1 is subdivided into three areas (subsites A and B and the `bridge'). (bd) Detailed views of the three subsites. In each case the fragment ligand and protein amino acids within 4 Å are shown, with the exception of Thr111 (b), which is located 5 Å from the ligand. Amino-acid residues that differ between PfHsp70-x and the human erythrocytic chaperones are labelled. Yellow dashed lines indicate hydrogen bonds inferred from the structure.

Subsite B of site 1 comprises a large pocket, only a small part of which is explored by the ligand HEW, thereby offering significant scope for ligand growth to enhance the affinity and potentially the specificity. In our structures, direct contacts occurred between the ligand HEW and PfHsp70-x residues Asp98, Arg101, Asp115, His118, Gly233, His257, Leu258, Glu261 and Asp262 (Fig. 2[link]c). All residues within 5 Å distance of the bound ligand in subsite B are strictly conserved between the parasite and human chaperones (Supplementary Fig. S3). Subsites A and B are in close proximity (7 Å), separated by a `bridge' formed by two pairs of PfHsp70-x residues engaged in hydrogen-bonding interactions (Asp115–His257 and Arg101–Thr256), which stabilize the relative position of the ATPase domain lobe IB to the rest of the protein (Day et al., 2019[Day, J., Passecker, A., Beck, H. P. & Vakonakis, I. (2019). FASEB J. 33, 14611-14624.]). We judge that opening up this protein `bridge' to directly engage subsites A and B using a single ligand would incur a large energetic penalty; thus, it may be more efficient to exploit both of these subsites by designing a ligand that connects them over the `bridge' (Fig. 2[link]a). We observed the binding of one ligand (JHJ) in this protein area, interacting with PfHsp70-x residues Asp255–Leu258, Asp339, Gln340 and Asn343 (Fig. 2[link]d). Interestingly, two of these residues (Gln339 and Asn343) in the parasite chaperone differ substantially from those at the same position in the human counterparts (leucine and glycine or serine, respectively; Supplementary Fig. S3), raising the prospect that connecting subsites A and B via this path may also contribute to ligand specificity.

3.3. Analysis of interaction sites on the PfHsp70-x ATPase domain: site 2

Site 2 is defined by the binding of a single ligand residue (JHJ) at this position (Fig. 3[link]a). In contrast to site 1, site 2 is relatively removed from the ATP-binding cleft; thus, it is less likely that ligand interactions there would affect the catalytic activity of PfHsp70-x. Furthermore, the site comprises a shallow surface on the parasite chaperone, which suggests that engineering high-affinity ligands targeting this site may be challenging. PfHsp70-x residues in contact with the ligand JHJ include Lys130, His145, Glu147, Glu48, Asp190, Ala193 and Ile194, all of which are conserved or conservatively substituted in human erythrocytic chaperones (Supplementary Fig. S3). Thus, all evidence suggests that site 2 is less suitable than site 1 for the design of potent and specific ligands of PfHsp70-x.

[Figure 3]
Figure 3
Analysis of interaction site 2. (a) Surface representation of the PfHsp70-x site 2, with the single ligand binding to this site shown as sticks. (b) Detailed view of the ligand bound to site 2 and protein amino acids within 4 Å. Yellow dashed lines indicate hydrogen bonds inferred from the structure.

4. Conclusions

We showed that a relatively limited exploration of chemical space, in the form of 233 fragments, yielded a number of molecules binding to the ATPase domain of PfHsp70-x, a chaperone that contributes to the survival and virulence of the malaria parasite P. falciparum. Fragments bound to this domain defined two interaction sites (Fig. 1[link]), of which site 1 is nearest to the chaperone catalytic cleft, includes a deep ligand-binding pocket and features a residue that is not conserved between human and parasite chaperones (Fig. 2[link]). These results suggest that it may be possible to design small-molecule inhibitors of the PfHsp70-x ATPase domain that would be both potent and specific for the parasite protein.

Footnotes

Current address: Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3RE, United Kingdom.

§Current address: Lonza Biologics, Lonza Ltd, Lonzastrasse, CH-3930 Visp, Switzerland.

Acknowledgements

We thank Edward Lowe for maintenance of the Oxford Biochemistry crystallization facility and assistance with fragment screening. We thank Diamond Light Source for the provision of synchrotron-radiation facilities and the XChem laboratory for use of their hardware and software pipeline for fragment screening. We are grateful to the editor and the reviewers of this manuscript for their helpful comments and suggestions, in particular in relation to ligand refinement. The authors have no competing interests in relation to this study.

Funding information

Funding for this research was provided by: Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (grant No. BB/R021759/1 to Ioannis Vakonakis); EPA Cephalosporin Fund (grant No. CF 329 to Ioannis Vakonakis).

References

First citationBoorstein, W. R., Ziegelhoffer, T. & Craig, E. A. (1994). J. Mol. Evol. 38, 1–17.  CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
First citationBricogne, G., Blanc, E., Brandl, M., Flensburg, C., Keller, P., Paciorek, W., Roversi, P., Sharff, A., Smart, O. S., Vonrhein, C. & Womack, T. O. (2017). BUSTER. Cambridge: Global Phasing Ltd.  Google Scholar
First citationBryk, A. H. & Wiśniewski, J. R. (2017). J. Proteome Res. 16, 2752–2761.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
First citationCharnaud, S. C., Dixon, M. W. A., Nie, C. Q., Chappell, L., Sanders, P. R., Nebl, T., Hanssen, E., Berriman, M., Chan, J. A., Blanch, A. J., Beeson, J. G., Rayner, J. C., Przyborski, J. M., Tilley, L., Crabb, B. S. & Gilson, P. R. (2017). PLoS One, 12, e0181656.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
First citationChen, V. B., Arendall, W. B., Headd, J. J., Keedy, D. A., Immormino, R. M., Kapral, G. J., Murray, L. W., Richardson, J. S. & Richardson, D. C. (2010). Acta Cryst. D66, 12–21.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationCox, O. B., Krojer, T., Collins, P., Monteiro, O., Talon, R., Bradley, A., Fedorov, O., Amin, J., Marsden, B. D., Spencer, J., von Delft, F. & Brennan, P. E. (2016). Chem. Sci. 7, 2322–2330.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
First citationCraig, A. G., Khairul, M. F. & Patil, P. R. (2012). Malays. J. Med. Sci. 19, 5–18.  PubMed Google Scholar
First citationCutts, E. E., Laasch, N., Reiter, D. M., Trenker, R., Slater, L. M., Stansfeld, P. J. & Vakonakis, I. (2017). PLoS Pathog. 13, e1006552.  CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
First citationDay, J., Passecker, A., Beck, H. P. & Vakonakis, I. (2019). FASEB J. 33, 14611–14624.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
First citationDutta, T., Singh, H., Gestwicki, J. E. & Blatch, G. L. (2021). Cell Stress Chaperones, 26, 355–366.  CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
First citationEmsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. (2010). Acta Cryst. D66, 486–501.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationErlanson, D. A., Fesik, S. W., Hubbard, R. E., Jahnke, W. & Jhoti, H. (2016). Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 15, 605–619.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
First citationHo, C. M., Beck, J. R., Lai, M., Cui, Y., Goldberg, D. E., Egea, P. F. & Zhou, Z. H. (2018). Nature, 561, 70–75.  CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
First citationHviid, L. & Jensen, A. T. (2015). Adv. Parasitol. 88, 51–84.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
First citationKoning-Ward, T. F. de, Dixon, M. W., Tilley, L. & Gilson, P. R. (2016). Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 14, 494–507.  Web of Science PubMed Google Scholar
First citationKülzer, S., Charnaud, S., Dagan, T., Riedel, J., Mandal, P., Pesce, E. R., Blatch, G. L., Crabb, B. S., Gilson, P. R. & Przyborski, J. M. (2012). Cell. Microbiol. 14, 1784–1795.  Web of Science PubMed Google Scholar
First citationMeimaridou, E., Gooljar, S. B. & Chapple, J. P. (2008). J. Mol. Endocrinol. 42, 1–9.  CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
First citationPace, C. N., Vajdos, F., Fee, L., Grimsley, G. & Gray, T. (1995). Protein Sci. 4, 2411–2423.  CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationPearce, N. M., Krojer, T., Bradley, A. R., Collins, P., Nowak, R. P., Talon, R., Marsden, B. D., Kelm, S., Shi, J., Deane, C. M. & von Delft, F. (2017). Nat. Commun. 8, 15123.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
First citationProellocks, N. I., Coppel, R. L., Mohandas, N. & Cooke, B. M. (2016). Adv. Parasitol. 91, 1–86.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
First citationRogala, K. B., Dynes, N. J., Hatzopoulos, G. N., Yan, J., Pong, S. K., Robinson, C. V., Deane, C. M., Gönczy, P. & Vakonakis, I. (2015). eLife, 4, e07410.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
First citationSchmidt, J. & Vakonakis, I. (2020). Acta Cryst. F76, 495–500.  CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationSmith, J. D., Rowe, J. A., Higgins, M. K. & Lavstsen, T. (2013). Cell. Microbiol. 15, 1976–1983.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
First citationSpillman, N. J., Beck, J. R. & Goldberg, D. E. (2015). Annu. Rev. Biochem. 84, 813–841.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
First citationSuzuki, Y., Shimizu, T., Morii, H. & Tanokura, M. (1997). FEBS Lett. 409, 29–32.  CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
First citationWarncke, J. D., Vakonakis, I. & Beck, H. P. (2016). Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 80, 905–927.  CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
First citationWinter, G., Lobley, C. M. C. & Prince, S. M. (2013). Acta Cryst. D69, 1260–1273.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationWojdyr, M., Keegan, R., Winter, G. & Ashton, A. (2013). Acta Cryst. A69, s299.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationWood, D. J., Lopez-Fernandez, J. D., Knight, L. E., Al-Khawaldeh, I., Gai, C., Lin, S., Martin, M. P., Miller, D. C., Cano, C., Endicott, J. A., Hardcastle, I. R., Noble, M. E. M. & Waring, M. J. (2019). J. Med. Chem. 62, 3741–3752.  CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
First citationWorld Health Organization (2019). Global Tuberculosis Report 2019. Geneva: World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/global-tuberculosis-report-2019Google Scholar
First citationZhang, Q., Ma, C., Oberli, A., Zinz, A., Engels, S. & Przyborski, J. M. (2017). Sci. Rep. 7, 42188.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoSTRUCTURAL BIOLOGY
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2053-230X
Follow Acta Cryst. F
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds